User talk:Sbb1413/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sbb1413!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Emha (talk) 10:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Soumya-8974: , could you please leave a note about the permission? Thanks a lot, --Emha (talk) 07:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:ElgooG.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ElgooG.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dionysius Exiguus.jpg

Copyright status: File:Dionysius Exiguus.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dionysius Exiguus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 04:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Caption copyright violation

Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (ALSJ), although hosted on a NASA site, is an independent venture that copyrights the descriptions and captions for the photos they upload. Therefore the captions such as the one you uploaded at File:AS11-40-5869-edit1.jpg are a copyright violation and need to be deleted (and rewritten in your own words). Also, you uploaded the third and fourth versions of one of the images, not sure if we need them? File:AS11-40-5869.jpg, File:AS11-40-5869 (21648755432).jpg, File:AS11-40-5869 (22056325122).jpg, File:AS11-40-5869-edit1.jpg (I see the one is rotated, one is poor quality, but I think the two remaining are duplicates). To find those, I just put the ID number into the search bar. Kees08 (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, I have fixed the Copyright! I want to debunk the "rotated crosshair" conspiracy.

Soumya-8974 (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

File:OmegA.jpg

File:OmegA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © 2019 Northrop Grumman Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, but can you tell me how to license the files by any aerospace company (in this case, Northrop Grumman)? There has no option like this!

Soumya-8974 (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Starhopper liftoff.jpg

File:Starhopper liftoff.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: SpaceX releases CC0 files on Flickr. The description on space.com doesn't state that this is a CC0 file.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Msaynevirta (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Falcon 1 Rocket Family.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Falcon 1 Rocket Family.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Falcon 1 Rocket Family.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

SpaceX Raptor

Why was SpaceX Raptor moved from its previous category name? It breaks the naming convention used by nearly all engine categories in Rocket engines of the United States, and all other SpaceX engine cats. Is this part of a broader renaming strategy? If so, that likely should be discussed more broadly. I'm not necessarily opposed, I just like consistency. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:SpaceX Demo-2

May I ask where it says in the Wikimedia Commons policies and/or guidelines that the category name has to be the same name as their associated English Wikipedia article? – PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

It is an ad hoc practice that the category name has to be the same name as their associated English Wikipedia article. Also look at the above discussion. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- We are not beholden to the naming conventions of the English Wikipedia. Please do not change a category's name simply because they decide to make a change. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I was about to say, you didn't even bother to reply to Huntster, so telling me to "look at the above discussion" is not helpful at all. It was less a discussion and more an editor expressing similar grievances. It being an "an ad hoc practice" is an exceptionally poor excuse, since it can be used to excuse basically anything without having to prove anything, really. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 08:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:LOP-G insignia.jpg

File:LOP-G insignia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 12:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of Kashmir.svg

Copyright status: File:Flag of Kashmir.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Kashmir.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

ছবি

শুভেচ্ছা, শুরুতে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় অবদান রাখার আহ্বান জানাতে চাই। অল্প কিছু বাঙালি এতে অবদান রাখে, অন্যদিকে কোন অবাঙালি এতে কাজ করবেন না কোনদিন, একজন বাঙালি হিসেবে আপনার থেকেও সাহায্য কাম্য।

আপনি কিছু বাংলা svg আপলোড করেছেন। অনুগ্রহ করে লোহিত বাংলা ফন্ট ব্যবহার করে আপলোড করবেন। অন্য ফন্ট মিডিয়াউইকি রেন্ডার করতে পারে না (উদা: File:Indian states and union territories-bn.svg-এর লেখা দেখতে খারাপ দেখাচ্ছে)। লোহিত বাংলার পরিবর্তে যদি অন্য ফন্ট ব্যবহার করেন তবে তা path-এ রূপান্তর করে দিবেন, তাহলে তা সঠিকভাবে আসবে। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Illegal occupancy of Kashmir

Namaste, I have read about your current requests for renaming. They are all about Jammu & Kashmir. During rename requests you have mentioned them as 'Azad J&K'. I object your this word. Please remember that this part of J&K was illegally occupied by Pakistan in 1948. So, as Indians we can't use the word "Azad". Therefore I have declined your request for renaming. Vande Mataram --Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 14:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Bombay_1956-1960.svg

Hello Soumya-8974,
please don't overwrite files in another language. You could have uploaded the English file as a separate file (Bombay_1956-1960 en.svg). The German-language file is the original and the English file is the derivative, not the other way round. Renaming the original does not make sense. --Furfur^{⁂ Diskussion} 17:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rajouri Airport.svg

Copyright status: File:Rajouri Airport.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rajouri Airport.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

File:101100-style air data boom.jpg

File:101100-style air data boom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

File:2020 India map blank.png

File:2020 India map blank.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2405:201:A:EBA7:69C4:152C:B313:7103 05:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Axiom Space logo.webp

File:Axiom Space logo.webp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

72.20.137.10 21:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Regarding [1] your edit summary is inaccurate. It was very frequently referred to as such, and that was its full name. It's also how the majority of scholars refer to it. The title you changed it to is really quite rare, now, and especially at the time. I advise you self-revert. GPinkerton (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Comm indep states ref 00.jpg

Copyright status: File:Comm indep states ref 00.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Comm indep states ref 00.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg

And also:

File:Dubai street view (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elly (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Reentry vehicles

Hi, here at Commons we try to work by some approximation of group consensus. So opening a discussion about a category, renaming it anyway, then closing the discussion just seven minutes later is hardly "consensus", is it? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

I didn't rename the category Reentry vehicles to Reentry modules after a CfD. Instead, I boldly redirected the former to the latter. I can restore the category if necessary. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Boe-CFT insignia unofficial.png

Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 12:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

TransHab

I'm not sure I understand this edit. Full scale prototypes were built prior to its cancellation, so it squarely fits the criteria of Category:Cancelled NASA programs. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't realise this. Thank you. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 08:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Cleanup Schriever Space Force Base

Recently, I am trying to reorganize most of the categories related to the US Space Force. However, when I renamed the Schriever Air Force Base category to Schriever Space Force Base and tried to move all the files, I found that the files moved to a maintenance category instead, and when I tried to move all those files in the maintenance categories back to SSFB, I found that several images unrelated to the base (or any kind of military in particular) are also categorized. So I need expert editors to cleanup the category. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 11:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Why remove category

Why remove the category of Cape Caveral LC-26 from the photo of the LC-26 blockhouse( File:LC-26 blockhouse.jpg? Bubba73 (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Actually, there is a museum at the location of former LC-26 called Air Force Space and Missile Museum. So when I categorized this under LC-26, I found that it causes a problem of overcategorization. So I removed the LC-26 blockhouse from the category. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

OK. Bubba73 (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Apollo_Lunar_Modules_by_name

Apollo Lunar Modules by name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Special:Diff/615261599

I'm sorry to inform you that your edit has turned all "China photographs taken on" categories into redirects, causing mass maintenance problems.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 15:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artist's rending of Mars Climate Orbiter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Two issues with recent activity

Hi Soumya. First, why are you moving elements of the Japanese Experiment Module from their official names to nicknames? Please stop this.

Second, why did you copy multiple images from SpaceX CRS-22 to Cargo Dragon C209? This is very unnecessary, as CRS-22 is a subcat of C209, and goes against standard Commons practice. The spacecraft is part of the mission from integration to a point past unloading, not just while it is launching or in space.

Thanks! — Huntster (t @ c) 18:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

I have reverted my Cargo Dragon edits. In the case of the JEM, the module was known in its official name when the categories were created. When the whole module got the nickname "Kibo", the name is used in virtually everywhere, even in the present day (the abbreviation JEM is also used, but never its full form). So it is unlikely people will type "Japanese Experiment Module" while looking for Kibo. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Kibo has never been its official name. It is its nickname. See https://iss.jaxa.jp/en/kibo/, for example. Kibo is used as a simpler, easier to remember and use term, but Japanese Experiment Module was and remains the official title. If you're concerned about searchability, then create category redirects to the proper name. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

I know, "Kibo" has never been the official name, but the official name "Japanese Experiment Module" is less common in formal publications since the adoption of the nickname. As I said before, it is unlikely for people to type the official name in the search bar for the module primarily known in its nickname, although node modules might be exceptions, where official names are also common (the Harmony module is also known as "Node 2" in general public). Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

As I said, create redirects rather than renaming and moving everything. It'll save you time and maintain correct information. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

As I noticed that a lot of ISS module names are in their nicknames, I thought the JEM and the PMM should too for the sake of consistency in category naming. I would do the opposite if the ISS module names were in their official names (like renaming "Kibo" to "Japanese Experiment Module", "Harmony" to "Node 2", "Destiny" to "US Laboratory Module" etc.). Anyway, thank you and happy editing. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Ah, that's where you have to be especially careful. The nodes, for example, were officially renamed. They started life as Nodes, but were renamed through internal efforts and public competitions. See [2] and [3] as example sources. Things aren't always so simple. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

As a separate observation, I note you changed "Satellite trails" to Satellite flares. While some changes needed to happen there, Satellite flares are a subtype of Satellite trails. Flares are brief flashes of reflected light (i.e., Iridium), where trails are consistent tracks in the sky (like what the ISS would present). — Huntster (t @ c) 18:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 05:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quick note about some language quirks: "in" and "at" are used in weird ways, and for specific locations like KSC and CCSFS, "at" would be most appropriate. See https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/vs/using-at-vs-in-for-place-and-time-correctly.html for a more in-depth explanation. Additionally, in normal use, Kennedy Space Center (or CCSFS for that matter) should not have a "the" preceding it in prepositional phrases. Strangely enough though, in common usage, similar locations like "Kennedy Space Center Visitor's Center" do prepend "the". English makes no sense sometimes, because it's such a mutt of a language. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out, as English is not my first language and I will be more careful on creating categories. However, in Commons, categories related to the Kennedy Space Center always have a definite article before the name of the spaceport, so I can't fix that thing at all. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

It's all good. I didn't mean for you to have to change anything, just wanted it to be a note for the future. I know, painfully, just how obtuse English can be when it's a second or third language. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Stripping out categories (yet again)

Why are you bulk depopulating valid cats Category:Kennedy Space Center in 1968 ?

See [4] and many others. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Actually I had conflicting ideas on what to include or whatnot to avoid overcat issues. I previously categorised whole missions into the category, later only its launch categories. Now I am quite firm in my opinion that only the launch categories should be categorised if available. So I am partially reverting the mass depopulation as a result of this. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

You seem to do this an awful lot: implementing badly thought out changes, then sometimes reverting them wholesale (or just leaving them broken, like calling reentry vehicles "modules", even when they're the entire vessel). How about if you just stop making any of these bulk changes whenever the whimsy takes you, but you instead try discussing them beforehand and seeing what other editors think? – just as how we're supposed to work here. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm seems to be a good option. However, unlike Wikipedia, Commons does not have a centralised area to discuss such things. This is why I have to do these boldly. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Also, I will stop the non-trivial mergings of categories to minimise disruptions. I am also reverting my merge of reentry vehicles. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

But you're not are you? You haven't "reverted" this, you've just changed it again, to the even more nonsensical "reentry capsules". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Uh, I have indeed reverted my merge of Reentry vehicles to Reentry modules, see the categories. I have renamed the Reentry modules category to Reentry capsules as part of an attempt to rescope the category. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

In what world is a nuclear missile RV (or at least, a prototype for one) File:Black Knight Gamma 201 engine and re-entry head.jpg a "reentry capsule" ? If you rescope the category, what about the RVs in it which are similarly not any sort of capsule? Or are you just going to create yet more sub-divided categories to no purpose, simply to make navigation unworkable. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing me that the file was in the wrong category. Happy editing. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 14:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

And please, please, please do not bite me just because I have done anything suspicious. You can warn me if I have done anything wrong, but please don't create hostility here. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 14:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

File:KSC-20210401-PH-CNS01 0001 - Artist's rendring of launch of Artemis 1.jpg

Hi Soumya-8974, if a rename request is declined please discuss the issue first before requesting it again. Thank you --Isderion (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

I was not re-requesting the rename. Instead, I was requesting a more minimal renaming than the earlier one. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 05:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

But are you aware of criterion 4, esp this:

Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.

How does this apply? --Isderion (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The first scenario applies for the rendering, that it is a NASA image and images from NASA should follow the naming convention of "Image name (ID)" convention. I upload most images from NASA in this convention. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 05:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Where was the naming convention agreed upon? Which complex template requires the NASA images to be in the mentioned convention? --Isderion (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't want to comment further on this as I have resoluted not to re-request any declined move request. Instead, I will create redirects for them. Soumya-8974 (he) (talk • contribs) 05:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080034).jpg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080034).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photographs attributed to Thomas Pesquet are copyrighted as he is an ESA astronaut, not NASA. Works of ESA employees must be explicitly released under a free license, and there is no indicated that is the case with this image. Merely being published on a NASA website is not sufficient.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 17:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080166).jpg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080166).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photographs attributed to Thomas Pesquet are copyrighted as he is an ESA astronaut, not NASA. Works of ESA employees must be explicitly released under a free license, and there is no indicated that is the case with this image. Merely being published on a NASA website is not sufficient.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 17:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:South Asia (orthographic projection) without national boundaries.svg

File:South Asia (orthographic projection) without national boundaries.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

183.83.46.212 07:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e079170).jpg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e079170).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Sbb1413/Archive 1

Contents

Welcome

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:ElgooG.png

Copyright status: File:Dionysius Exiguus.jpg

Caption copyright violation

File:OmegA.jpg

File:Starhopper liftoff.jpg

File tagging File:Falcon 1 Rocket Family.jpg

SpaceX Raptor

Category:SpaceX Demo-2

File:LOP-G insignia.jpg

Copyright status: File:Flag of Kashmir.svg

ছবি

Illegal occupancy of Kashmir

File:Bombay_1956-1960.svg

Copyright status: File:Rajouri Airport.svg

File:101100-style air data boom.jpg

File:2020 India map blank.png

File:Axiom Space logo.webp

We need your feedback!

Copyright status: File:Comm indep states ref 00.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Category:Reentry vehicles

Notification about possible deletion

TransHab

Cleanup Schriever Space Force Base

Why remove category

Category:Apollo_Lunar_Modules_by_name

Special:Diff/615261599

Valued Image Promoted

Two issues with recent activity

Stripping out categories (yet again)

File:KSC-20210401-PH-CNS01 0001 - Artist's rendring of launch of Artemis 1.jpg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080034).jpg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e080166).jpg

File:South Asia (orthographic projection) without national boundaries.svg

File:ISS from the SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor during Flyaround (Iss066e079170).jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Sbb1413/Archive 1

Welcome

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:ElgooG.png

Copyright status: File:Dionysius Exiguus.jpg

Caption copyright violation

File tagging File:Falcon 1 Rocket Family.jpg

SpaceX Raptor

Copyright status: File:Flag of Kashmir.svg

ছবি

Illegal occupancy of Kashmir

Copyright status: File:Rajouri Airport.svg

We need your feedback!

Copyright status: File:Comm indep states ref 00.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

TransHab

Cleanup Schriever Space Force Base

Why remove category

Valued Image Promoted

Two issues with recent activity

Stripping out categories (yet again)

Navigation menu

Search