User talk:Dinkum

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dinkum!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Dinkum!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Please be more careful when categorising your uploads[edit]

Please read COM:OVERCAT to find out how to categorise your uploads. Please also verify that you are using the correct categories. I removed redundant categories from one of your uploads and also recategorised it as it was put in to either very unspecific categories or in to completely incorrect categories. You can see the changes I made to the categories here. I have had to do the same to many of your uploads: recategorising them and/or removing redundant categories. - Takeaway (talk) 10:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Dinkum. Pour rebondir sur la remarque ci dessus, faîtes bien attention à ne téléverser que des images où fichiers qui sont susceptibles d'avoir un quelconque intérêt encyclopédique. Et veillez surtout à bien placer les fichiers dans la catégorie la plus précise qui existe ou bien de placer dans la description des informations permettant à un contributeur plus averti de mieux catégoriser le fichier. Exemple pour File:Porte d'entrée Paris.jpg , il eut été intéressant d'indiquer l'adresse de la porte. De même pour ce fichier File:Quartier Latin.jpg. Pour d'autres images, comme celles des fleurs File:Cosse de plantes en WA.JPG il faut mieux éviter de les téléverser si vous n'avez aucune idée que l’espèce ou de la famille. En restant à votre disposition pour de plus amples précisions. Benchaum (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour Dinkum. J'ai l'impression d'avoir écrit dans le vide le message ci-dessus comme en témoigne un téléversement de ce jour File:Fleur mauve.jpg où vous n'avez pas été capable d'indiquer que la fleur est un lys... Lorsque les fichiers sont mal catégorisés, ils très difficilement exploitables. Benchaum (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Pflanzenfotos[edit]

Hallo Dinkum, danke für die vielen hübschen Pflanzenfotos aus aller Welt. Die meisten davon habe ich mit Category:Unidentified plants versehen, so dass unsere Botaniker sie finden und ggf. bestimmen können. Grüße --:bdk: 00:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank für Dein motivierendes „Dankeschön“ :-)
Ich habe gesehen, dass Du Dich mittlerweile schon besser zurecht findest. Wenn Du mal Fragen zu Commons haben solltest, dann frag mich ruhig auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Und ansonsten lass Dich bitte nicht von den diversen voll- oder halbautomatisch erstellten Beiträgen auf Deiner Diskussionsseite irritieren. Sie helfen uns, die große Bilderflut und gewisse formale Dinge (komplett unkategorisierte Dateien, fehlende Freigaben/Lizenzen, Urheberrechtsverstöße u.v.m.) halbwegs zu bewältigen. Zwar führt das manchmal zum Eindruck, Commons wäre ein sehr unpersönliches Projekt mit wenig kommunikativen Nutzern, aber glücklicherweise tummeln sich hier genug freundliche Menschen, die sich gegenseitig helfen – man muss sie nur finden oder selbst gefunden werden ;-) wobei letzteres insbesondere über Special:NewFiles geschieht (so wie's bei mir hier war). Viele Grüße nochmal --:bdk: 04:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Fleurs jaunes inconnues.jpg[edit]

Fleurs jaunes inconnues.jpg how do you know now what species it is? Primula -Species and -Cultivar look often quit the same. Where a sign at the Plant when you take the Photo. please give only such a exact name if you are really sure. do it not with "oh there is a pic that looks nearly the same". same for lot of your other pics. the quality of some of them is to bad for find out what it really is exactly. Greetings --BotBln (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Insect on Leaf[edit]

Insecte sur une feuille Is a Colorado Beetle [1] Very nice photo. Regards Notafly (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Uploads[edit]

I think that there is a problem with the upload wizard.Some of my photos were not licensed either. After you upload check that the following information is there using Edit (at the top of the page)

Licensing[edit]

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
  • share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

[[Category:]] Type or paste in the Category here after the : [[Category:]] Type or paste in a second Category here If you have another problem send me a link to the file and I will see if I can fix it. Good luck annd let me know what happens Notafly (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


One step at a time[edit]

Hello Dinkum [2] Here I added the Category:Unidentified plants using the edit facility then saving the page. Do this for a few of your unidentified plants. But first you should add to the description where the plant was found, the date and when possible also the habitat. This will aid the identifier as well as making your photo much more useful.The changed category will not fully show for a few days while the server catches up. But send me a list of those you have fixed.Answer me below this on your this your talk page.If you send me a message on mine sign it with four of these ~ Which I have done here Notafly (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Robert

French Site for Plant id[edit]

I think I see how this works. Once we have the locality details for your pics we can try the site. It looks as though you speak French. Am I right? Talk to you soon Notafly (talk) 19:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Joyeux Noel[edit]

Open here [3] I retired from the museum and pick up my mail once a month so this is delayed.Thankyou for your letter and the all important ticket.My e-mail is robertnash1945@yahoo.co.uk.Send me a message Very best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 17:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Catégorisation[edit]

Bonjour Dinkum,

Pouvez vous être plus précis dans la catégorisation et la description des fichiers qui vous importez ? Par exemple en indiquant l’adresse exacte des sites photographiés. Je pense aujourd'hui aux trois photos : File:Bas-relief,_Paris_2.JPG File:Porte d'entrée d'une salle d'escrime, quartier Latin.JPG & File:Bas-relief, Paris.JPG qui bien qu'étant de qualité, sont actuellement très mal catégorisées faute d'information précise dans leur description (et donc inexploitables par d'autres utilisateurs du wiki). Elles se retrouvent dans une catégorie mère qui ne devrait contenir directement aucun fichier. Benchaum (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue devant le Sénat.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Statue devant le Sénat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

86.217.4.186 14:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Sculpture Maillol Jardin des Tuileris.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sculpture Maillol Jardin des Tuileris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

hi, nice photo. the french seem to have the most restrictive copyright wrt FoP. there is another copy at the Kröller-Müller Museum. see the article here: [4]. i would suggest parking these at flikr, or upload US ones as PD no notice. Slowking4 (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Art_Project see google's faq where copyright remains in effect.[5] (i.e. there are questions of copyright) normally 70 years after the artist's death, it should be pubic domain, (or if they worked for the government (WPA)), but the galleries have a way of putting restriction on their high res scans, i.e. NC ND.
i only learned this confusing copyright stuff by hard knocks at the knee of user:Missvain (public art). the "PD no notice" is little understood, and lots of tags are wrong. since this is a us website, we could ram it to the French, but we act with a due regard for local copyright law. <shrug>. an attempt to have FoP failed in the Assemblée Nationale. [6] you could try uploading in english wikipedia as "fair use" "- ("non-free 3D art") but it's a struggle. Slowking4 (talk) 12:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Le mamouth du jardin des plantes.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le mamouth du jardin des plantes.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Mammouth du Jardin des Plantes.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mammouth du Jardin des Plantes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sitta-carolinensis-001.jpg[edit]

Hallo Dinkum, in case you did not notice - File:Sitta-carolinensis-001.jpg is correct with the bird below the wood. "This image is not upside-down." Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistake of the bird upside down. Hallo Saibo,
Es tut mir wirklich leid dass ich solch eine Dummheit gemacht habe. Aber es war aus versehen. Ich fand eigentlich das Foto ganz gut. Entschuldige bitte. : MFG Dinkum (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Dinkum, ist doch kein Problem. Sowas passiert immer mal - ich wollte es dir nur sagen, damit du überhaupt weißt, dass da was schief lief. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Boulevard des Batignolles Bonnard.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Your are right. The licence is not OK as there are five more years to go before 70 years elapsed since the artist's death. Too bad, we will have to wait.
I proposed the image for deletion.

Dinkum (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Seeds in WA[edit]

Your picture above is of Casuarina sp. empty mature seedpods--philmarin (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

File:High building.jpg[edit]

Do you have any more information about this building by any chance? Like which city, or at least which country it's in? Its title/description doesn't say much. Ghouston (talk) 05:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Yes, I took this photo in Perth, Western Australia. But I don't recall where exactly. Probably more or less in the center. Dinkum (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Perhaps now that it's in the Perth category somebody will identify it some day. It looks like it may be an apartment building or Hotel. Ghouston (talk) 22:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Couldn't resist searching for it myself. It's the Condor Tower [7]. Ghouston (talk) 22:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I am impressed. Thank you very much also for the interesting document. Regards. Dinkum (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Dinkum - do you have a photo location for File:Mother and child.JPG, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Yes, sorry I did not put the information before: it is the "Romantic Garden" in the Parc de Bercy in Paris. There is an artificial pond there. Regards. Dinkum (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque François Mitterrand - vue générale.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bibliothèque François Mitterrand - vue générale.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

194.199.4.202 08:18, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

La pierre de Pontijou[edit]

Bonjour ! J'ai pris récemment la photo de pierres dont on m'a expliqué qu'elles servaient à la construction et qu'elles s'appelaient "pierres de Pontijou". Pontijou (41500) dans le Loir et Cher a des carrières de pierres. J'ai cherché à mettre ma photo File:Pierre de Pontijou.JPG dans la bonne catégorie mais je trouve cela très difficile. J'ai lu que cette pierre était un calcaire dur, un calcaire siliceux. Je pense donc "Limestone"... Pourrais-tu m'aider pour la catégorie ? Merci par avance. Dinkum (talk) 15:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Dinkum,
Je ne connaissais pas cette pierre. Apparemment, il s'agit d'une sorte particulière de calcaire. Dans ce cas, je te propose de créer une catégorie Pontijou limestone, que tu inclueras dans la catégorie Limestones.
Mais comment faire pour créer une catégorie, me demanderas-tu ? C'est très simple : dans ton image, tu mets la catégorie [[Category:Pontijou limestone]]. Quand tu valideras la page, elle apparaîtra en rouge. Normal, puisqu'elle n'existe pas encore. CLique simplement sur ce lien rouge, pour arriver dans la catégorie, et écris le nom de la catégorie mère à laquelle tu veux la rattacher. Ici, [[Category:Limestones]]. Valide la page, et ça y est, elle est créée ! (et contient une image, la tienne). Tu peux peut-être la rattacher à Category:Maves, puisque Pontijou est un hameau de cette commune. Tu peux aussi mettre une description de la catégorie ; regarde par exemple Category:Caen stone.
Pour ta photo, si elle a été prise dans une carrière, tu peux la catégorier dans Category:Limestone quarries (en précisant le nom de la carrière dans la description de l'image).
Sémhur (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Précisions : tu peux enlever la catégorie Stone que tu as mises, car elle est trop générale. Pontijou limestone sera beaucoup plus précis. Quant à Category:Limestone quarries, c'est une bonne idée ; je la mettrai plutôt au niveau de la catégorie Pontijou limestone, car toutes les pierres de Pontijou sont des matériaux de construction. Sémhur (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


Cher Sémhur,

Ta réponse va bien au-delà de mes espérances ! Un grand merci. Je vais m'atteler à la tâche. Dinkum (talk) 13:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Problem[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bush_in_Western_Australia.jpg is quite an anomaly - it is near coastal sandune (ocean is in background) and the dead tree in view is not an indigenous plant - so the whole landscape is in no way representative of any of the average landscape units that could be identified (the grass in foregound looks exotic as well) - can you remember where you photographed it? locality might be the only redeemoing feature - it in no way is representative of anything traditionally understood as 'bush in western australia' - cheers SatuSuro (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi SatuSuro!
I took this photo in Western Australia on the road between Kalbarri and Cervantes: George Grey Drive, Port Gregory Road, North West Coastal Highway and Indian Ocean Drive. Unfortunately I don't remember where I took the photo (probably between Kalbarri and the Pink Lake). I shouldn't have titled this photo "Bush in Western Australia" it is misleading. I took a photo of a different kind of vegetation (maybe it is not called "bush" that I don't know) which is not representative of any average landscape in WA. Now, it is true that the typical representation of the bush in Australia is most of the time something like this File:Anne Beadell Highway 2006.jpg with the red earth, the shrubs and a few gum trees. After reading your message I made a virtual trip on (parts) of the same road (Kalbarri-Cervantes) with Google Street to try to find the place where I took this photo. I didn't find the exact spot. But I saw that on this road you have the view of your typical Australian bush, but you also have the yellow grass and the dead trees as shown on my picture. And you can see that kind of landscape for kilometers. I don't know the name of the black dead trees or of the yellow grass in foreground but I can assure you there are hundreds of trees and grass spots like this to be seen on this road. If they are indeed no indigenous plants, it would be very interesting to know what they are and how come they are to be found in this part of Australia. - Regards Dinkum (talk) 13:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for responding - your memory is helpful. I travelled through eastern europe in 2009 and I start looking at photos 3 years later and for some photos I cannot place them - whether rumania, hungary or somewhere else... Fortunately I have not uploaded them onto the internet though.

The number of landscape types in western australia and consequently the variation of shrubs/grasses is quite complex and not easy to explain here - but your memory is very helpful - we can put an area name rather than 'western australia' as a category - which is what I was trying to clean out.. cheers thanks SatuSuro (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 5.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 3.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bercy - Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Geranium pratense 2.JPG[edit]

Hallo Dinkum, ich habe File:Geranium pratense 2.JPG in Category:Unidentified Ranunculaceae geschoben und die Beschreibung entsprechend angepasst, weil es sich hier auf keinen Fall um Geranium pratense handeln kann, die Blätter aber ähnlich aussehen wie bei den Gattungen Thalictrum und Aquilegia. Ich kann nicht ganz ausschließen, dass auch die neue Kategorie falsch ist, aber die vorherige war sicher falsch. Nur zum Vergleich: File:GeraniumPratense-plant1.jpg zeigt Geranium pratense mit Blättern. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Statue de Komitas, buste..JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Statue de Komitas, buste..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I need help[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:MyGallery&withJS=MediaWiki:JSONListUploads.js {{helpme}} When I want to see my gallery I get a message like this:

Database Error: User 'daniel_www' has exceeded the 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 15) on sql-s4/commonswiki_p

Fatal error: Call to a member function addQuotes() on a non-object in /home/daniel/public_html/WikiSense-live/web/common/WikiQuery.php on line 940

Could someone tell me what I should do to get it fixed? Thank you for your help

Thank you for your help Dinkum (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Replied at COM:HD#Problem with my gallery. -- Rillke(q?) 16:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rillke! Was für eine angenehme Überraschung! Vielen Dank, es funktioniert wunderbar. Grüsse. Dinkum (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grue en vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grue en vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Greetings[edit]

Greeting Dinkum and congratulations on so many photos an especially this marvellous photo of Boulevard Saint-Germain [8] How are you? Robert aka Notafly (talk) 15:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Paris[edit]

Perhaps I will return to Paris next year (I know Paris well, mostly from the 1960s and 1970s but I have worked in the city on many occasions leaving time for some further exploration). This year I will be in my second favourite city Rome and perhaps Greece.Have you been to Deyrolles in Rue du Bac [9]? They allow photography to judge from flickr and there is a short Wiki page.I will make a list of desired photos when I get back from Italy (maybe July). Warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC) PS. I see you too have problems with FOP All my commons photos of modern Rome are now deleted even Termini station.Also several Paris pics notably a large playful ceramic cat in Montparnasse cemetery.[10] La vie?

FP Promotion[edit]

Grue en vol.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Grue en vol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grue en vol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Le coucou, réponse[edit]

Bonsoir Dinkum, ravi de faire ta connaissance.

Je "fais don", en effet, de mes propres images au Domaine Public. On dit "tomber" dans le Domaine Public, moi je crois au contraire que ça les élève, au lieu de les faire "tomber".
C'est un choix "philosophique", en quelque sorte (Allons-y pour les grands mots !). Je ne suis pas libertaire, ni anarchiste, ni même communiste, ni quoi que ce soit de ce genre, mais j'estime que la seule licence qui vaille, pour "Commons", c'est bien la CC0. ça me parait consubstantiel à l'idée que je me fais de cette collection.
Si je voulais autre chose, j'irais ailleurs, il y a plein de sites pour héberger des images.
Mais moi, ce qui m'intéresse, c'est que mon "travail" (mon loisir !) puisse profiter librement à tous, sans contrainte, et au bénéfice de la généralisation de la connaissance.
Je laisse ensuite à chacun la liberté de faire de mes images l'usage qu'il veut, et donc, je sais que certains peuvent être indélicats. Je l'assume, je m'en accommode, et je considère même que c'est une preuve de succès, finalement !
Quelqu'un a essayé (j'ai oublié qui) de me convaincre que non, CC0, ce n'était pas "bon". Mais je n'ai rien compris à ses arguments, et donc je m'en tiens là.
Comme tu peux le voir si tu fais un peu d'histoire dans mes fichiers, au début, j'utilisais la licence "conseillée", puis j'ai changé. C'est bien délibérément que j'ai fait ce choix.
Que dire d'autre ? Je comprends ta gêne ou ton malaise, mais, comme dit l'autre, c'est le risque du métier !
En ce moment, je fouine dans les antiquités, et je "retravaille" des images anciennes, c'est passionnant. Et là, pas de question: elles sont déjà dans le Domaine Public, et mon travail ne génère pas de droits nouveaux, donc...
Bonne fin de soirée, et à bientôt j'espère.--Jebulon (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Bonsoir Dinkum, ta réponse aussi me fait plaisir.
Oui c'est bien ce qui est extraordinaire dans le monde de "Wikimedia", surtout à "Commons" qui est international.
Honnêtement, quand tu y réfléchis, ça ne devrait pas marcher. Et pourtant, ça fonctionne !! Depuis des années maintenant, et le phénomène s'amplifie ! Il y a des hauts et des bas, des gens qui claquent la porte, d'autres qui t'agacent, des divergences dans les jugements, mais ça marche dans le monde entier !
Connais-tu une autre structure de ce genre, sur Internet ou ailleurs ? Pas moi.
J'ai vu que tu avais photographié un oiseau qui avait fait sensation. Je t'en félicite. Je t'engage et te conseille vivement de participer aux "labels" (QI, VI, et FP). Non pas pour la gloriole d'en avoir tant et tant (en ce qui me concerne, ça va, merci ! Face-smile.svg), mais pour soumettre tes productions à nos collègues du monde entier, et recueillir leurs observations, afin de progresser. De même, il faut aussi ne pas craindre de "juger" les productions des autres, ça aussi ça permet de progresser. Enfin, ça permet des rencontres, qui vont parfois jusqu'à des rencontres "pour de vrai", et la naissance de réelles amitiés, pas seulement virtuelles. C'est ainsi que je connais "pour de vrai" une bonne dizaine de participants, même étrangers, et que nous avons développé des contacts bien au delà de la photo.
Ce que tu me dis de nos "croisements" dans les rues de Paris m'est déja arrivé, et nous avons, nous les Parisiens, de fréquents contacts désormais. Ainsi avions nous décidé d'une sortie à trois (Myrabella que j'ai déjà rencontrée, Moonik et moi) autour du bassin de la Villette le 12 juillet dernier, mais j'ai malheureusement dû me décommander. Tu peux toutefois en ce moment profiter des belles photos de Myrabella. J'ai regretté d'avoir fait faux-bond, mais je sais que d'autre occasions se reproduiront.
Adhères-tu à "Wikimedia France" ? Si non, tu devrais. Là aussi se nouent des contacts intéressants.
N'hésite pas à me réécrire ! Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Immeuble dégoulinant de peinture rouge - Paris - Les Quais.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Immeuble dégoulinant de peinture rouge - Paris - Les Quais.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.44.1.62 10:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Dinkum,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Peinture murale angle avenue de Choisy et rue des Malmaisons - Paris 13ème.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peinture murale angle avenue de Choisy et rue des Malmaisons - Paris 13ème.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Peinture murale vue de l'avenue de Choisy - Paris 13ème.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peinture murale vue de l'avenue de Choisy - Paris 13ème.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Trompe l'oeil au Marais.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trompe l'oeil au Marais.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Wall painting rue Gassendi in Paris.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wall painting rue Gassendi in Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Salsifis ?[edit]

Bonjour,

Il ne me semble pas que cela soient des salsifis mais plutôt des panais. Petro [pronto?] 15:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Palais Royal -Bangkok 2.JPG[edit]

Ich erlaube mir darauf hinzuweisen, daß ich besagtes Photo aus commons in meinem Buch: "Buddhistische Tempelanlagen in Thailand" (Buddhist Temples of Thailand) ISBN 978-3-7357-3903-2 verwendet habe. --Zenwort (talk) 08:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Demande de renommage[edit]

Bonjour,

Tu as récemment demandé le renommage de ton compte sur fr:WP:DRCU. Je peux tenter de faire le renommage, par contre il te faudra abandonner le compte utilisateur « Baningh-nga » que tu as sur enwiki, enwiktionary, enwikivoyage et commonswiki. Ces 4 comptes présents dans cette liste seront alors détachés de ton compte global et ceux-ci seront attachés après l'unification de tes comptes. Es-tu d'accord ? Elfix 09:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Merci Elfix de me venir en aide. Oui, je suis tout à fait d'accord. Dinkum (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Alors, voici quelques détails (je me suis frotté à quelques soucis techniques en essayant de renommer ton compte) : il y aura bientôt un outil de fusion de contributions te permettant de rassembler sous un seul nom tes contributions faites avec ton ancien et ton nouveau nom. Il n'est donc pas possible de faire le renommage de suite. En attendant, j'ai libéré le nom « Dinkum » sur les autres wikis qui l'utilisaient (à savoir tawiki, enwiki, enwiktionary, enwikivoyage, commonswiki). Je te suggère de :
  • Créer ton compte global à l'aide de Special:MergeAccount, tu pourras ainsi naviguer sur tous les projets Wikimedia à l'aide de ton nom « Dinkum »
  • Re-former le compte global de ton ancien compte « Baningh-nga » en t'y connectant et en allant sur fr:Special:MergeAccount
  • N'utiliser que ton compte « Dinkum » dans le futur, même si tes précédentes contributions sur Wikipédia sont toujours attachées ton ancien compte.
Dès que la fonctionnalité de fusion de contributions sera disponibles, je ferai le renommage proprement. Si tu as besoin d'aide, je reste à ta disposition. Elfix 11:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 16:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Héron cendré dans le parc de Bercy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron cendré dans le parc de Bercy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Deux étourneaux en hiver.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deux étourneaux en hiver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Crocus du Jardin des Plantes mi-février.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus du Jardin des Plantes mi-février.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Bibliothèque François Mitterrand - sur l'esplanade.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bibliothèque François Mitterrand - sur l'esplanade.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Piscine Joséphine Baker - vue de loin.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Piscine Joséphine Baker - vue de loin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Piscine Joséphine Baker sur la Seine.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Piscine Joséphine Baker sur la Seine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grue cendrée en vol - Maldives.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grue cendrée en vol - Maldives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wuzur 03:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Portrait de grue du Japon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait de grue du Japon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Les oiseaux, la liberté, peinture de rue à Paris.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Les oiseaux, la liberté, peinture de rue à Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.2.99.87 15:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cricket à Hyde Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cricket à Hyde Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hyacinthus orientalis et apis melifera.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyacinthus orientalis et apis melifera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anemone nemorosa - pistils.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone nemorosa - pistils.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Apis mellifera en vol et scilla luciliae.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apis mellifera en vol et scilla luciliae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Southwark Bridge à Londres.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwark Bridge à Londres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vanessa cardui - Jardin d'Agronomie Tropicale.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vanessa cardui - Jardin d'Agronomie Tropicale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish 📥 09:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish 📥 09:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Eupeodes luniger[edit]

Message on my page Notafly (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Scorpiurus vermiculatus - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scorpiurus vermiculatus in Jardin des Plantes de Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

VI[edit]

Bienvenue en VI. Il faut aussi une légende en anglais pour le concours. Soigne les légendes; se sont souvent elles qui feront que ton image aura une belle vie... Face-smile.svg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

J’ai corrigé la légende. Regarde les modifications et n’hésite pas à poser des questions. Les noms en latin des espèces et de genres doivent être en italique. Si, dans la légende, tu utilise un nom dans une autre langue il doit être en italique. Close up pour les insectes ne s’applique que pour les images où la bestiole n’est pas vue en totalité ; une patte ou la tête. Bonne Journée.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Cette image file:Muehlenbeckia astonii.jpg est la meilleure pour cette espèce. La tienne est meilleure pour le « feuillage ». Il faut réduire le scope à Leaf ou foliage. N’oublie pas Paris dans la légende pour plus de clarté.
Pour Dichelostemma ida-maia tu ne montre pas la plante mais une inflorescence. Il faut réduire la scope à inflorescence. On ne met jamais les synonymes, certaine espèce ont plusieurs dizaine des synonymes. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Clarkia pulchella - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clarkia pulchella (Pinkfairies, ragged robin or deerhorn clarkia), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tettigonia viridissima female - Jardin d'Agronomie Tropicale.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Animal camouflage Tettigonia viridissima (Great Green Bush-Cricket) female .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Muehlenbeckia astonii - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muehlenbeckia astonii (Shrubby tororaro) foliage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Dichelostemma ida-maia - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dichelostemma ida-maia (Firecracker flower) inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Dichelostemma congestum - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dichelostemma congestum (Ookow or fork-toothed ookow) inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Persicaria tinctoria - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Persicaria tinctoria (Chinese indigo) inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Iberis pinnata - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iberis pinnata inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Herniaria ciliolata - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herniaria ciliolata (Fringed rupturewort) foliage .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Ziziphora capitata - Jardin des Plantes.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziziphora capitata (Field basil) Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tyrimnus leucographus.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tyrimnus leucographus inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Difficultés ?[edit]

Bonjour Dinkum,

J'ai lu sur la page de l'ami @Archaeodontosaurus: (là, avec le "ping" représenté par un "@", je lui signale que je t'écris, il verra qu'on parle de lui) le récit de tes difficultés à pénétrer le monde magique de la syntaxe de "Commons", je te dis, comme lui, de ne pas t'inquiéter, et de persévérer. C'est bien vrai, moi comme toi j'ai ramé et pesté au début, ne comprenant pas pourquoi il fallait mettre des "{{" ou des ":" à tout bout de champ. j'ai vu des catastrophes naître sous mon clavier, simplement nées de l'oubli d'une accolade ou d'un double point...

Je me tiens à ta disposition si tu as besoin d'aide. Par la même occasion, je me suis permis de corriger ta page d'utilisateur, tu y répètes ce qui est déjà automatiquement contenu dans la "boîte" linguistique (dite "Babel"). Tu verras, à la longue, ces trucs entre guillemets dont tu parles (du genre:✓ Done) sont bien pratiques, et en plus, ils sont internationaux ! Quelqu'un qui a paramétré sa page en anglais lira "done", même si tu as écrit "fait", entre guillemets.

Bref, n'hésite pas à poser des questions, continue à importer de belles photos, mais si j'en crois cette page, fais aussi attention au "copyright" et autres "droits d'auteurs", c'est le pire ennemi de nous autres, pauvres contributeurs volontaires.

Bon courage !--Jebulon (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Neviusa alabamensis.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neviusia alabamensis (Alabama snow-wreath).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tiarella wherryi.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tiarella wherryi (Foam flower).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tulipa subpraestans.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tulipa subpraestans in Kew Gardens - United Kingdom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Diascia vigilis inflorescence.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diascia vigilis (Twinspur) inflorescence and buds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Le Palais de Justice vu du Pont Saint-Michel.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le Palais de Justice vu du Pont Saint-Michel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Photo-phylles 2017[edit]

Hi Dinkum,

I just found some interesting pictures on your pages.

Probably you don't know what is Photo-phylles. It's both an international competition and a pedagogical exhibition organized by the Botanical Garden of Bordeaux, France, and the Association of botanists OÏKOS. The selected photos are shown for more than 4 months in various places and receive each year more than 5,000 visitors, for a half young people coming with their schoolmasters or teachers.

I suggest you have a look to this website http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

We would be honoured if you accept to participate! It's completely free.

Best regards Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 15:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC) (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC) (administrator of the french Wikibooks)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)