User talk:Holger.Ellgaard/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Copyright status: File:Trädgårdshallen 2000a.jpeg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trädgårdshallen 2000a.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:John Lundqvist Skogskyrkogården.jpg

Hi Holger.Ellgaard, is this sculpture located "at a public place outdoors (på eller vid allmän plats utomhus)", in other words, are the legal terms for Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Sweden really met? --Túrelio (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes!--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Otterblenden Travemünde

Hallo Holger, Dein Foto der Otterblenden im alten Travemünder Turm hat mir gefallen. Von wann ist es denn? Es muss ja schon ein Weilchen her sein...  ;-) Herzl. Grüße ... --OpusNovus (talk) 09:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo! Freut mich! Das Bild ist vom 19. September 2014. Die Lichtanlage im de:Leuchtturm Travemünde ist zwar seit ein paar Jahren ausgeschaltet, aber noch funktionstüchtig, mit Otterblende und allem Drum + Dran (heute Museum). Gruss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alby naturreservat skylt 2013.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alby naturreservat skylt 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Slussen nov 2014g.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Slussen nov 2014g.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hangsna (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sachs byst

Hej Holger!

Noterade att Din bild File:NK Josef Sachs.jpg saknar uppgift om vilken konstnär som gjort bysten. Eftersom denna står inomhus och därmed inte omfattas av panoramafrihet vore det nog bra om den uppgiften kan läggas i så att vi kan vara säkra på att bilden inte omfattas av upphovsrätt (jag hoppas och utgår från att det är en konstnär som dog för mer än 70 år sedan). /FredrikT (talk) 12:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hej, jag vet tyvärr inte vilken konstnär som gjort bysten. Därför är det svårt att veta om han/hon dog för 70 år sedan. Jag kan vid tillfälle kontakta NK och fråga dem. Tills vidare är det kanske lika bra att radera bilden. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jag vet inte heller vem som gjort bysten, men när jag sökte efter information om den på nätet, dök det upp ett foto på en helt annan byst föreställande samma person, se [1]. Denna byst verkar dock finnas på Nordiska museet. Jag vet inte om båda bysterna gjorts av samma skulptör. Om du kontaktar NK, bör du därför vara försiktig så att bysterna inte blandas ihop. Även bysten på Nordiska museet nämner NK i rubriken, men det kanske bara beror på att mannen grundade NK. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jo, jag såg också den på Digitala museet (inte fri bild och ingen uppgift om konstnären). Den av mig fotograferade bysten finns i varuhuset NK på plan 1, ingen risk för hopblandning. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jag väntar på svar från NK. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bysten är skapad av Ivar Johnsson (1885-1970). Jag har anmäld radering för min bild. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I sådana här fall är det en bra idé att kategorisera diskussionen som Category:Undelete in 2041, så kan filen återställas om 27 år. Detta kan visa sig väldigt praktiskt om bysten exempelvis förstörs någon gång före 2041. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stenmosaik detalj 2014.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stenmosaik detalj 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hangsna (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gideon Börje självporträtt 1925.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gideon Börje självporträtt 1925.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Revent (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Slussen Gideon Börje 1918.jpeg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Slussen Gideon Börje 1918.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Revent (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Saltsjöbanan station Slussen 2014b.jpeg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saltsjöbanan station Slussen 2014b.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

1989 17:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hot Dog Dog.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hot Dog Dog.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Geisendorf arbetsplats.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Geisendorf arbetsplats.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file is "CC BY 3.0", the athor is Matti Östling, this information is not missing! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Geisendorf modell 1963.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Geisendorf modell 1963.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file is "CC BY 3.0", the athor is Matti Östling, this information is not missing! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Slussen december 2014 video.webm

Hallo Holger, schönes Video! Aber sind die gezeigten historischen Aufnahmen auch wirklich Copyright frei? Für eine Präsentation auf der Hauptseite sollte das eindeutig klar sein, daher meine Nachfrage. Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 11:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danke! Ja, natürlich, die drei historischen Bilder sind alle vor 1969 gemacht, und ohne Werkshöhe, da greift "PD-Sweden-photo". Die sind auch im Artikel von Slussen. Aber ich kann das auf der Beschreibungsseite verdeutlichen. Gruss aus Stockholm--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 13:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Besten Dank, ist dann Motd am 2015-01-15. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Prima, da freue ich mich. Slussen in Stockholm wird nämlich bald abgerissen und eine vollkommen neue Anlage gebaut. Mein Filmchen ist dann ein historisches Dokument. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tetra pak 2008.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tetra pak 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 07:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deine Motd Nominierungen

Hallo Holger, eine Bitte: kannst du noch die Übersetzungen ins Englische bei den vorgeschlagenen Dateien nachtragen? Von Schwedisch habe ich leider keine Ahnung... Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alles klar, ich habe die Beschreibungsseiten vervollständigt. Tschüss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Guds hand 2007.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Guds hand 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fnielsen (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I thought it was in Denmark. — Fnielsen (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Danish Wikipedia has the article Kunst i Holstebro, where your image is used to illustrate "Guds Hånd" Sculpture in Holstebro, Denmark, see, e.g., Google Streetview. I thought that your photo was a photo of that one. — Fnielsen (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Intressant, jag skall skriva det i artikeln om sv:Guds hand (skulptur). Synd att man inte få ta bilder på konst i Danmark. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Serafimerringningen 11 februari 2015.webm

Hallo Holger, bist du bezüglich der Musik sicher, dass es sich da um Copyright-freies Material handelt? Das müsste ja für den Komponisten und die Ausführenden selbst gelten. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Pristurus, ich bin der Sache nachgegangen. Die Musik gehört zum Psalm Nr. 524 und ist ursprünglich eine alte schwedische Volksweise aus Skåne (Komponist=unbekannt). Die Vorführung in der Kirche unterliegt keinerlei urheberrechtlichen Beschränkungen. Ich habe die Beschreibungsseite dementsprechend vervollständigt. Gruss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Besten Dank für die Klarstellung. Musik im Tonteil kann immer mal wieder eine Quelle von möglichen Urheberrechtsverletzungen sein; bei Dateien für die Hauptseite frage ich dann lieber mal nach. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kälvesta Björnidevägen 2012 01.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kälvesta Björnidevägen 2012 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stjärnhus Gröndal stadplan 1945.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stjärnhus Gröndal stadplan 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    16:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Video från VHS

Hej,

Vill först säga att det är fantastiskt att du laddar upp äldre video hit. Jag har några förslag på hur detta skulle kunna göras ännu bättre.

Just nu verkar det som att du har fört över filmerna genom att rikta en digital videokamera mot en TV-monitor. Det medför att ljudet blir "burkigt" och bildkvaliteten försämras. Om man istället kopplar videobandspelaren direkt in i datorn blir både bild- och ljudkvalitet bästa möjliga. Detta kan göras med ganska enkla sladdar som kan köpas på exempelvis Kjell & Company för några hundringar. På Internet finns flera guider för hur man gör detta, här är en.

Ett annan, mindre sak: Text som placeras ovanpå filmen är problematiskt, främst eftersom det försvårar återanvändning om man skulle vilja använda stillbilder eller göra en ny film. Då kan det vara bättre att istället lägga textskyltarna mot svart bakgrund mellan inslagen så att filmbilderna lämnas intakta.

Väsk (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hej Väsk och tack för tipset. Ja, det stämmer jag filmar av TV:n med en digital videokamera. Jag hade för några år sedan en anordning för "direktöverföring" men den tyckte att mitt eget material hade copyright och vägrade. Men nu finns det kanske bättre och enklare överföringsmöjligheter. Jag skall kolla med Kjell & Company om det finns en enkel USB-anslutning med passande RAC-kontakter. Detta med "program" som måste användas för att spela in video på datorn låter krånglig. Jag tycker själv att mina nuvarande överföringar ger sämre bild + ljud, men som historiska dokument och i det lilla bildformatet på WP kan det vara acceptabelt. I denna video File:Vision 86 Sveriges Television.webm är även originalljudet "burkigt", inspelat på långt håll i en skräning mässhall med dålig akustik. När det gäller infälld (förklarande text) vill jag dock inte ändra mitt nuvarande utförande. Jag vet om problemet och är mycket sparsam med förklarande text, men att lägga den mellan klippen på svart bakgrund skulle förstöra rytmen i filmen. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nu prövade jag två överföringsanordningar och flera olika videobandspelare med tveksamt resultat:
  • Plexgear Moviesaver 220 (Kjell & Company, 299:-): Bra ljud, urdålig bild (svart-vit, fladdrig och förvrängd)
  • Magix Video Saver (Clas Ohlson, 599:-): Bra ljud, dålig bild (störningar, förvrängningar i över- och nederkant, tidvis fladdrig)
Båda lämnade jag tillbaka, facit: tekniken att föra över gamla analoga videofilmer till digitala sådana är fortfarande oacceptabel och att filma av bildskärmen är ett bra och billigt alternativ.
Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Västberga industriområde skylt 2015.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Västberga industriområde skylt 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Holger Ellgaard 1956.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Holger Ellgaard 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Skå Edeby herrgård 1936.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Skå Edeby herrgård 1936.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Karl G.H. Karlsson arkitekt.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Karl G.H. Karlsson arkitekt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cementa bulkbil.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cementa bulkbil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]