User talk:Herbert Ortner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 12:10, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No license images[edit]

Thank you for tagging images without license!

Please notify uploader with {{subst:Image source|Image:<Name>}}. You could also use MediaWiki:Quick-delete.js for simplifying this task.

Thank you!

EugeneZelenko 15:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Bobbio bridge.jpg[edit]

Superb photograph which not only brings out the peculiar quality of that bridge but shows us what Bobbio is like and its topographical context. Beautiful composition. Exquisite tonal values. Congratulations, and thanks for uploading it! —Ian Spackman 08:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image[edit]

Jindrichuv hradec 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jindrichuv hradec 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

--Thermos 16:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:SB108215_back.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SB108215_back.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:SB108215_front.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SB108215_front.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:SB108215_left.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SB108215_left.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Skulpturen[edit]

Bitte verzeih meine Fehleinschätzung zu den Skulpturen. Ich habe ausschließlich von deren Aussehen (hätte mal via Google schauen sollen) auf deren Alter geschlossen und lag da gehörig falsch. Grüße, --Polarlys 22:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Porthmadog6293223.JPG[edit]

Hi. You say this is own work, but list author as one Noel Walley on en.wp, who apparently doesn't exist. Could you please clarify where the photo is from please? Thanks. Oh, and ditto for Image:Porthmadog6293229.JPG-mattbuck (Talk) 11:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, never mind about the original author, I found that it was just linked wrong, but it would help if you could tell me if they were transwikied or what. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
NoelWalley just got back to me. Please do not claim others' images as your own. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This wasn't my intention indeed. Just a little error with transwiki in my earlier times. I copied the information from en without changing. --Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

My photos[edit]

Hi, thanks for uploading some of my photos - I've applied my own user template to the originals, but kept the edited ones licenced merely under BY-SA-2.0 rather than 2.0 and 3.0.

Amazing, no talk page messages for a whole year... -mattbuck (Talk) 23:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Pinzgauer Lokalbahn[edit]

Habe die Ehre,

mit Kollegen leite ich eine Homepage ( www.busbahnbilder.de ) Wir fragen an ob sie uns ein paar Bilder der Pinzgauer Lokalbahn zur Übernahme unter ihrem Namen auf unsere Seite genehmigen.

Wir würden uns freuen.

Mit besten Grüßen

andy

Kein Problem, dazu habe ich sie ja hier hochgeladen. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 14:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Taken picutre[edit]

Hello. One of the most popular sites in Serbia taked your pic. http://www.b92.net/putovanja/destinacije/evropa.php?nav_category=823?yyyy=2009&mm=03&dd=05&nav_id=348336

Cool! I hope the route to Višegrad will open soon! -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 18:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token a7f0749f4107c4d473541d5c6c469480[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Hallo Herbert,
war dir diese lizenzwidrige Nutzung deines Prater-Fotos File talk:Prater vom Riesenrad.jpg bekannt? Von mir nutzen die auch ein Foto lizenzwidrig ohne jeden Bildquellennachweis. Inzwischen habe ich ermittelt, dass sämtliche Bilder in der Spalte "Sehenswürdigkeiten Wien" von Commons stammen und alle lizenzwidrig benutzt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Vor langer Zeit hat mich der Betreiber einer Website angemailt, ob er dieses Bild (und andere) auch unter anderen Bedingungen zeigen dürfte. Ich habe damals mein OK dazu gegeben, daran kann ich mich noch erinnern. Ich habe aber keine Ahnung mehr, ob das diese war, es ist schon eine kleine Ewigkeit her und Mails habe ich dazu heute auch nicht mehr. Was mich betrifft, also im Zweifel für den Angeklagten (auch wenn ich aufgrund der anderen Fälle eigentlich nicht glaube, dass es der gewesen ist). -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Danke für die Rückmeldung. --Túrelio (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank[edit]

Thank of opinion Commons:Deletion requests/File:HPS Bissel Krauss Helmholtz.svg. Add your opinion as to the next Commons:Deletion requests/File:GBT-Faido.png ? Danke --W.Rebel (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Zillertalbahn[edit]

Herbert, auf diesem Bild File:Zillertalbahn VT6 Mayrhofen 2010.jpg würde mich der dritte Wagen im Zug interessieren. Wenn ich das richtig interpretiere, handelt es sich um den ehemaligen B4 35, der zum BD4 umgebaut wurde. Welche Nummer trägt er heute? Auf diesem Foto ist die Nummer leider nicht lesbar. Danke für eine kurze Antwort. Markus -- Gürbetaler (talk) 12:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Laut Auskunft meiner gut informierten Quelle bei der Zillertalbahn wurde 2000 der B4 35 zum BD4 41 und 2003 der B4 34 zum BD4 40 umgebaut. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank!-- Gürbetaler (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright Permissions[edit]

Our non-profit educational resources group would like to use your image of The Odeon (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Messene_02.jpg) in one of our publications. Could you confirm that this image is available for use under the GNU Free Documentation/Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license, and could you indicate how you would like to be credited in the publication? 24.83.213.104 17:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC) Genie MacLeod, The Critical Thinking Consortium

Yes, this is my picture. You may also use it under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. Just place my name and "Creative Commons CC-BY" to the picture or wherever you usually do this in your publication. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Herbert Ortner,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

benutzung bild 2.jpg Jindrichuv Hradec[edit]

Geerter Herr Herbert, Ich bitte um erlaubnis zum benutzen Bildes Jindřichův Hradec im meinen Blog - http://petrhujer.blogspot.com naturlich werde unter dem bild link zum wikipedia und ihr name als autor. mein Deutsch ist leider nicht 100% 
                     Peter Kohlert
Geht in Ordnung! -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

DANKESCHÖN, vielleicht könnten Sie diese Fotos interessant finden: http://petrhujer.blogspot.com/search?q=Zittau (leider nur mit Händy gemacht) Kohlert 19:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[edit]

File:Wien Nord 1670-25 198709.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


File:Murau Kapuzinerkloster 2 2012-08-11.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

CPPbHC|AT[edit]

Hallo Herbert, habe deine Entfernung der Vorlage {{CPPbHC|AT}} bei den 2 Murauer Bildern wieder rückgängig gemacht, die Vorlage dient ja auch dazu, das manchmal schwierig auszumachende Kennzeichen auf dem Bild zu finden (quasi auch als Nachweis des Schutzes nach HC). BTW: wenn du annotationen löschen möchtest, reicht es nicht, den Inhalt auszuräumen, leere Annotationen machen keinen Sinn. Also besser delete statt edit. Aber nicht in diesem konkreten Fall. meint --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Alles klar. Meine Intention war, die redundante Kategorie beim Bild selbst loszuwerden, da ich sie bei der übergeordneten Kategorie (sofern vorhanden) für besser aufgehoben halte. Aber wenn der Hinweis per Baustein in die Annotation eingefügt wird, wird auch die Kat. beim Bild automatisch erstellt. Da kann man wohl derzeit nichts machen. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
die Vorlage stammt von mir und alles ist änderbar. Die Doppelkategorisierung habe ich bisher hingenommen. Da es kein öffentliches Verzeichnis aller Haager Konventionskulturgüter gibt, war meine Intention die Bilder mit Schilder zu sammeln, quasi auch als Nachweis. Man könnte beispielsweise per Zusatzparameter die Auto-Kategorisierung unterdrücken. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Sprachvorlage[edit]

Hallo, danke, dass du einige der TARS631-Bilder besser kategorisierst und eine bessere Beschreibung hinzufügst! Aber gehört die Sprachvorlage nicht eigentlich als "{{de|Text}}" und nicht als "{{de}} Text" gesetzt? Sonst funktioniert ja die Ausblendung mittels CSS nicht. lg darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 21:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Gute Frage, ich habe mich damit eigentlich noch nicht im Detail beschäftigt - auch nicht bei meinen eigenen, weil es dort vom Uploadformular erzeugt wird. Ich kann es natürlich künftig berücksichtigen. Sensationell, was er da alles fotografiert hat. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Da du offenbar teilweise ziemlich massenhaft umkategorisierst (noch einmal danke für deine viele Mühe!): Kennst du Cat-a-lot? Vielleicht kann das deine Arbeit etwas effizienter machen. darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 11:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Sieht interessant aus, werde ich mir genauer ansehen! -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

TUSC token 356aaded22713cad89b2bb2fee8a82b4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Beschreibung dieses Fotos[edit]

Hallo Herbert Ortner, kann das wirklich die Herrengasse in Graz sein? Ich wüßte nicht, wo die so einen Knick macht. Eher die Annenstraße? Gruß --Eweht (talk) 05:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Eweht! Das war, als ich versuchte den Standort zu identifizieren auch mein erster Gedanke. Aber die guten Google-Luftbilder und ein wenig Ortskenntnis führten mich dann doch auf eine andere Spur. Das ist der Blick vom Anfang der Herrengasse in Richtung Hauptplatz. Das rosa Eckhaus mit dem Cafe steht an der Ecke Sporgasse/Sackstraße und ganz im Hintergrund ist das beflaggte Kaufhaus Kastner & Öhler zu erkennen. Das graue Haus hinter der Straßenbahn mit dem Balkon, das ist das Rathaus. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Ja, tatsächlich! Die Doppelhaltestelle am Hauptplatz ist auch erkennbar. Danke. --Eweht (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

User Manuela61[edit]

Du hast recht mit deiner Vermutung, ich möchte nur mehr Fotos in meinem Account haben, die meinen Vorstellungen von Qualität entsprechen. Der Username, den ich will, ist leider schon vergeben. Die paar Bilder könnte ich leicht wieder hochladen, das ist nicht das Problem. Jetzt hoffe ich auf die Globalisierung, Grüße, Manuela (talk) 16:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Sry dich nochmals zu belästigen. Ich hatte inzwischen die Idee, die Bilder, die ich nicht mehr auf meinem "öffentlichen" Account haben möchte, auf einen anderen Account hochzuladen oder zu verschieben und diese unter der Lizenz "Public Domain" freizugeben. Wie mache ich das mit möglichst wenig Aufwand? Danke für deine Unterstützung, Grüße, --Manuela (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kein Problem. Mein kann zwar Dateien auf einen neuen Dateinamen verschieben (lassen) aber nicht den Uploadernamen ändern. Ich würde daher zuerst den neuen Account anmelden, dann alles hochladen und dann die Originale mit dem Vermerk Same picture now uploaded under new username (mit Link dorthin) löschen lassen. Vorher aber prüfen, wo welche Bilder verwendet wurden und dort dann die Verlinkung auf die neue Version umschreiben! Anstatt "Public Domain" empfehle ich allerdings CC-0 (Creative Commons Zero). Das ist in der Anwendung das gleiche, aber rechtssicher formuliert, da es im Urheberrecht europäischer Prägung keine "Public Domain" gibt, bzw. eigentlich die Möglichkeit garnicht vorgesehen ist, seine Werke in die Gemeinfreiheit zu entlassen.-- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Danke für deine Unterstützung, dann werde ich das so machen. Mit "Public Domain" meinte ich eh CC-0. --Manuela (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Baureihe 5047.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Baureihe 5047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 09:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Baureihe 5047.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Baureihe 5047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

92.248.0.232 16:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Baureihe 5047.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Baureihe 5047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thomas.moder (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Herbert Ortner,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiener Straßenbahn: Streckenkategorien[edit]

Hallo! Da du im Bereich der Wiener Straßenbahn mitgearbeitet hast, möchte ich dich einladen, Kommentare zu meinem Vorschlag, die Straßenbahnstrecken (nicht Linien) Wiens zu kategorisieren, abzugeben – etwa ob das so sinnvolle Kategorien sind oder man sie anders aufteilen sollte. Falls dich das nicht interessiert, darfst du diese Nachricht gerne entfernen. darkweasel94 09:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)