User talk:Thesupermat/Archive1

Image:Eglise_Sainte_Agnes_Maisons-Alfort_France.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't speak english. it's ok ? Thesupermat 22:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eglise_Saint-Thégonnec_par.JPG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 21:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you can delate. Thesupermat 19:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piste de l'lhippodrome de Vincennes2.JPG[edit]

Please tag your images[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

I ask it for the deletion of the image.--ロロ 08:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 09:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

suppression image[edit]

File:Piste de l'lhippodrome de Vincennes2.JPG

Hello, tu peux supprimer cette image ? il y a une faute dans le titre, merci --Thesupermat 09:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done mais tu peux aussi apposer {{bad name|Nom correct du fichier}} sur la page de description de l'image. Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 08:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio ?[edit]

Hello, à ton avis ? Merci --Thesupermat (talk) 14:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

J'ai tout viré.

Merci du signalement et bonne continuation ;) --Bapti ✉ 16:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau du Taureau 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superb composition. The wave draws into Ile Louët, while the château in the backgound balances the picture nicely. Thegreenj 01:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'epoque visages floutés.JPG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Thesupermat!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bois de megaloceros.JPG is uncategorized since 27 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paris le bois de Vincennes sous la neige janvier 2009 018.JPG is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paris le bois de Vincennes sous la neige janvier 2009 007.JPG is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Plante de bord de mer à Carantec.JPG is uncategorized since 1 May 2009.
Image:Couloir d'accès à l'opéra.JPG is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
Image:Île de Sieck - Santec - 011.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Colloque wikimedia décembre 2010 - image d'illustration - 002.JPG was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rétromobile 2011 - Rolls Royce inconnue- 003.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paris - Chapelle des Catéchismes - 29 rue Las Cases - 101.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Paris - Salon de l'éducation 2011 - 010.jpg was uncategorized on 24 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bonhams - The Paris Sale 2012 - Delahaye 135M Cabriolet - 1946 - 004.jpg was uncategorized on 7 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tempete Klaus[edit]

Bonjour, je viens te voir car tu as travaillé ce fichier. Peux-tu en créer un autre du même genre avec le passage de la depression, visible sur cette page. Par avance merci. --Thesupermat (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, si je comprends bien, le problème est surtout que ma carte n'est pas correcte ! Elle est sensée indiquer la trajectoire de la tempête Klaus, or d'après Météo France, elle est passée plus au nord. Il vaudrait mieux que je mette l'actuelle à jour, non ? (à moins que je n'ai pas bien compris) Sémhur (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pas du tout, le passage de la tempête est bien placé, c'est juste que la depression est passée à hauteur de la Rochelle. Nous avons 2 trajectoires parallèles (grosso modo). c'est pour montrer que la tempête n'est pas centrée sur la depression. Suis-je clair ? Merci--Thesupermat (talk) 13:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, je comprends mieux. Dans ce cas, je pense qu'on pourrait avoir les deux trajectoires sur la même carte. Je propose d'ajouter le chemin de la dépression en bleu. Qu'en dis-tu ? Sémhur (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Faut essayer et pis on verra le résultat. --Thesupermat (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voilà ce que ça donne. Sémhur (talk) 12:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

çà fait bizarre de voir la flèche bleu qui ne se prolonge pas comme la rouge, faudrait la faire continuer. --Thesupermat (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...sauf que je ne connais pas le chemin suivi par la dépression après, je ne vais pas l'inventer. Donc on laisse comme ça, ou sinon autre solution, je coupe le trait rouge au même niveau que le bleu (en le faisant terminer par une flèche aussi). Sémhur (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hop ! il y a une image avec la trajectoire de la dépression, juste après le tableau des vitesses du vent, si çà peut aider.--Thesupermat (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, donc le cœur de la dépression passe au nord de la Corse. Mais en regardant les différentes images de ce site, j'ai maintenant l'impression que le chemin indiqué pour la tempête n'est pas le bon sur ma carte ; en Méditerranée elle descend bien plus vers le sud, pour finir par passer sur le nord de la Sardaigne et le sud de la Corse (voir ici), ce qui semble d'ailleurs plus logique par rapport à la position de la dépression ? Sémhur (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Effectivement, l'image est très parlante. --Thesupermat (talk) 11:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'est mis à jour. Je pense qu'on est bon maintenant :) Sémhur (talk) 14:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erreur bis[edit]

Hello, Cette image est mal nommée, il s'agit du lac des Minimes. Merci. --Thesupermat (talk) 07:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Le mieux est que tu re-téléverses l'image sous le bon nom et qu'on supprime la mauvaise. Je dis ça parce que la fonction renommer ne fonctionne pas encore pour les images, et qu'on utilise un bot qui recharge l'image (donc, après la manœuvre, elle n'est plus dans ta galerie et tu n'es plus dans l'historique). Il y a le modèle {{Bad name}} à mettre sur l'image mal nommée. Je ne supprime pas tout de suite, histoire que tu puisse récupérer la description. --Coyau (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le renommage des images a été activé pendant 2 jours, mais il y avait un bug (la page de description ne suivait pas toujours l'image) donc ça a été désactivé. --Coyau (talk) 12:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression faite.
J'en pense quoi ?... C'est une question difficile... Je trouve les ombres un peu bouchées, mais ça marche bien pour détacher l'arrière-plan et j'ai l'impression que les sépales sont un peu surex'. Sinon c'est net, la profondeur de champs marche bien, il n'y a pas de bruit. En fait, j'attends de voir les réactions avec intérêt. --Coyau (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

demande de suppression d'images[edit]

Hello, peux-tu supprimer ces deux images :

Merci, c'estjuste qu'il y a une erreur dans le titre, ce sont les membres postérieurs (j'ai rechargé les images avec le bon nom). Par avance merci. --Thesupermat (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Fait monsieur, mais avec le modèle {{Bad name}}, ça va tout aussi vite ! Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 06:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre Dame de Rocamadour à Camaret.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 11:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magasin à poudre.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commonist licenses[edit]

Dear Thesupermat,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 8000 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Traduction:

Cher Thesupermat,

Comme tu le sais peut-être, Wikimedia est actuellement en cours de migration de la GFDL vers la licence cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons est également en train de migrer vers cette licence, et nous n'en sommes plus qu'à 8000 fichiers à traiter (il y en avait environ 1,8 million au départ). Malheureusement, ce nombre croît toujours, car Commonist contient des modèles de licence obsolètes. Tu sembles utiliser Commonist pour tes imports ; pourrais-tu changer les lignes suivantes dans le fichier license.txt de ton dossier Commonist ?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} devrait être changé en {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} devrait être changé en {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} devrait être changé en {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Peux-tu également m'indiquer si je peux corriger les images que tu as déjà importées, en y ajoutant {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} ?

Merci beaucoup. Multichill (talk)

Traduction par guillom

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île Louët - baie de Morlaix.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Belle photo ! Yann 10:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bois de Vincennes printemps 2009 - 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Belle composition, pourriez-vous ajouter le géocode ? --Ymaup 10:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
fait --Thesupermat 20:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus dans le jardin - 049.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good image. --Cayambe 16:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bob de Groot au Salon du Livre 2010[edit]

Salut,
il semblerait que ce soit un autre personne que tu ais photographié. File_talk:Bob_de_Groot_-_Salon_du_livre_de_Paris_2010_bis.jpg
Esby (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château des Montgommery à Ducey - 010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 22:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
done. ;-) --Berthold Werner 17:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. Pitke 18:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epée de François 1er.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Upper part of the sword of king François 1st of France, ca. 1510, in the Musée de l'Armée in Paris. On the other side one may read the beginning of the verse of the "Magnificat": Fecit potentiam. The end of the verse is visible here: in brachio suo (He hath shewed might in his arm). Good to me. --Jebulon 23:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re painting (copié de ma page)[edit]

Bonjour, je viens de voir que tu avais modifié la description d'une de mes photos. Ce modèle est intéressant et j'aimerai savoir s'il peut être utilisé par commonist sachant que j'aurais des centaines de photos du musée de l'armée à charger. Merci de ta réponse.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, ce modèle me parait également intéressant (il est d'ailleurs en phase de restructuration si tu veux participer). En revanche, je ne sais pas du tout comment commonist fonctionne, désolé.--Zolo (talk) 11:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai posé la question sur Commons talk:Tools/Commonist. Voici la réponse, je ne sais pas si ça te parle, moi pas mais c'est peut-être parce que je n'ai jamais utilisé Commonist:

"it's possible, but not in a very userfriendly way: you'd need to put a copy af the the image_wikimedia_commons.bpp template into the "settings directory" $HOME/.commonist and adapt it to use {{Artwork}} instead of {{Information}} -"

Ah oui au passage le modèle est devenu "artwork"--Zolo (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gilberto Gil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

détourage et Cie[edit]

Bonjour.
En allant sur la page d'Archaeodontosaurus avec qui je corresponds régulièrement, j'ai vu ton message concernant le détourage. J'ai plusieurs infos à te communiquer sur ce sujet.

je débute dans cette technique (avec The GIMP), mais suis plein de bonne volonté. J'ai déjà toutefois eu des photos détourées primées QI , et j'en ai une en FP qui semble devoir réussir son examen aussi. Je suis patient et minutieux. J'ai envie de progresser dans cette technique (et dans d'autres, d'ailleurs !)
je suis parisien
Comment t'y prends-tu pour photographier ? On t'ouvre les vitrines ? Tu t'es annoncé, ou tu prends un ticket comme tout le monde et tu te débrouilles à travers les vitres ?
Je suis fana du Musée de l'Armée, et j'ai quelques petites connaissances dans le domaine (même si je ne suis pas militaire!). Le sujet m'intéresse énormément. Je me demande d'ailleurs si je n'ai pas fait un commentaire sur une de tes photos (l'épée de François 1er ?) proposée en QI il y a quelques temps...
Je te propose de m'envoyer pour commencer un fichier (une photo) à détourer, je te la renverrai une fois le job fait, et tu me diras si ça colle. Il faut juste savoir que c'est un peu long car il faut être très attentif si on veut un bon résultat.

voilà c'est tout simple. Si tu es intéressé n'hésite pas.

Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 08:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. Voici ma production de ce soir. Environ 2 heures de travail. Est-ce que c'est ce genre de chose que tu envisages ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut. Il n'y a pas de secret, si tu veux un bon résultat, il faut être très minutieux. Pour l'épée, j'ai agrandi à 400%, et j'ai fait à la souris tout le tour de l'image (je t'expliquerai plus techniquement si tu veux) de la manière la plus précise possible. C'est vrai que c'est "chronophage" (on va de plus en plus vite avec l'expérience, j'ai l'impression), mais le résultat peut être très joli (je trouve que ton épée y gagne, en l'occurrence, même s'il y a des choses à revoir). A mon avis, il faut choisir avec soin la photo, et il vaut mieux qu'elle soit elle même déjà très réussie (notament au plan de la netteté), pour ne pas perdre son temps à travailler une image qui n'en vaut pas la peine. Ou alors, il faut que le "background" soit vraiment pourri. Peut-être as-tu vu mon buste de Cicéron. Je ne sais pas si la photo est géniale, mais compte tenu de l'arrière plan d'origine, il fallait vraiment faire quelque chose ! Bien à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 09:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ombre portée : je n'ai encore jamais essayé ! Mais j'ai lu quelque part sur Internet un tutoriel sur le sujet. Dès que je le retrouve je te fais signe (pas mal, ton "casque" !)--Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle de la commanderie des Templiers de Villemoison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great encyclopedic photo with very good technical quality.--MrPanyGoff 08:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Mondial de l'automobile 2010 - Volvo S60 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Mondial de l'automobile 2010 - Citroën WRC 2010 - 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --High Contrast 13:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

300SL[edit]

Ta version est d'un beau doré alors que la voiture est argent. Ce changement est facile a opérer mais je ne sais pas avec quel logiciel tu travailles. Sur la courbe RVB tu prend B et du rajoute un peu sur cette voie est le tour est joué en 20 secondes. Je veux bien le faire si tu m'en donnes l'autorisation... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Envoie moi le RAW sur mon Email je la traite cet après-midi on doit aussi pouvoir corriger les aberrations chromatiques (archaeodontosaurusATlive.fr)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Musée de l'armée, rencontre[edit]

Bonsoir
Merci de ton aimbale message.
Je serai ravi de te rencontrer, mais ça me parait difficile à prévoir.
Tu auras sûrement noté que je ne suis pas systématique : je ne vais pas quelque part pour y prendre des photos, mais quand je suis quelque part, j'essaie d'y prendre des photos...L'occasion fait le larron, mais je ne suis (et je tiens à ne rester) qu'un amateur libre de s'intéresser à tout...
Il en fut ainsi pour le musée de l'armée. J'y suis allé au cours d'une promenade en famille, et j'avais mon appareil photo avec moi. D'ailleurs, le musée était fermé (1er nov, et 1er lundi du mois !) et je n'ai pu profiter que de la Cour et des environs, donc.
Si je sors, si je vais voir une expo, j'essaie de l'illustrer pour "vous" sur "Commons", mais là, je ne sais pas si je retournerai aux Invalides ces temps prochains...
Je ne suis en général libre que le week-end, ou sinon "à la volée", de façon imprévisible...
Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrouilleur automatique[edit]

Salut,

Pour information, je t'ai ajouté le statut "patrouilleur automatique" pour que tes modifications soient désormais automatiquement marquées comme surveillées.

Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 16:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama[edit]

Bonjour. Je suis en effet un peu gêné. Ces photos ont été faites avec la fusion en panorama de plusieurs photos, mais elles n'ont pas l'apparence (format étiré) d'un panoramique. J'avais crû au début qu'elles étaient prises en grand angle. Je ne sais pas si on doit les mettre sous Category:Panoramics. Coyau fera sans doute la même réflexion que toi, mais ces photos n'ont vraiment l'apparence que de grand angle. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas trop d'avis. Tu peux les remettre si tu veux dans la catégorie, par souci d'homogénéité avec les autres où j'ai laissé (ex: Category:Panoramics in Aisne). Désolé et bonne journée, Jack ma (talk) 08:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fête de la Musique à Amiens[edit]

Non, il ne s'agit pas de quelqu'un de ma famille. Mais cela ne semble pas poser problème (aucun message reçu ou mail perso à ce jour). Je demande toujours en principe pour des plans rapprochés, soit directement, soit par des gestes très significatifs et en soulevant (et désignant du doigt) très ostensiblement mon appareil pour bien montrer que je vais photographier. J'attends alors l'accord (signe, sourire, etc) ... Dans le cas de l'image que tu cites, le garçon accompagnait (si je me souviens bien) les musiciens qui étaient très heureux que je les prenne en "concert" (j'en avais fait 2 seulement d'eux ... hélas, vues assez nulles pas dignes d'être déposées sur Commons, visages grimaçants + micro devant). Le public autour voyait mon "entreprise" et mes attentes de bons regards, de la bonne position des uns et des autres ...

j'avais manfestement l'accord de plusieurs qui m'observaient parfois plus que les musiciens ... pour preuve au moins les 2 femmes en blanc/gris (moitié droite) sur la vue non "retaillée/croppée" ...File:Amiens (21 juin 2010) Fête de la musique 005.jpg. La jeune fille debout juste derrière le garçon ne voulait manifestement pas être prise de face et a pratiquement "posé" et attendu que j'ai terminé.

Dans la plupart des cas, ce sont aussi les gens qui me demandent de leur communiquer mes photos, me réclament mon adresse @mail, parfois me donnent la leur, et me demandent sur quel site je les mettrai en ligne ... beaucoup pensent immédiatement "Facebook" et je leur fais pour l'occasion de la pub pour WP et Commons. Certains que je revois parfois un an après me disent être déçus que je n'ai "pas encore" mis en ligne celle(s) les montrant. Je n'ai eu pour l'instant qu'une demande de "retrait/floutage" alors qu'à l'origine j'avais eu aussi l'accord, d'autant qu'ils posaient plus ou moins ou s'exhibaient costumés pour une fête médiévale. La femme m'expliqua par mail (et je l'ai par la suite rencontrée lors d'une autre "prestation") que la situation familiale et de couple avait changé ou s'était "tendue" et que le "papa" ne voulait plus que son "ado" soit reconnaissable. J'ai donc repris la photo devenue après coup "litigieuse" et l'ai redéposée floutée. La "maman" m'a exprimé alors sa satisfaction ... voir ci-contre ! Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rencontres Wikimedia - Paris[edit]

Salut ! Dis voir, est-ce toi le photographe qui a pris plein de photos tout au long des rencontres d'il y a 15 jours? Avec son ordinateur pas loin de la "tribune"? Car cette personne m'a prise en photo à un moment ! Alors si c'est toi je veux bien la photo (envoie-moi alors un courriel depuis Wikipédia, je te réponds ensuite pour que t'aies mon adresse et me l'envoyer) et sinon, est-ce-que tu saurais à tout hasard de qui il pouvait s'agir? (tu étais bien là le samedi 4 parce que j'apparais sur une de tes photos (zoom): tout au fond contre le mur ) Merci d'avance, et à bientôt ! --Floflo (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, effectivement, j'ai fait de nombreuses photos lors des rencontres. Par contre, je ne me souviens pas de toi, donc ça va être difficile de te dire si effectivement je t'ai photographié. si tu as une photo de toi à m'envoyer, ça m'aidera. Merci

Ok. Et bien pour une photo de moi, tu peux voir sur le trombinoscope de Wp. Sinon bah j'étais tout à gauche, contre le mur, environ 5ème rang... Merci. --Floflo (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Après vérification, je n'ai pas de photo de toi.

Ok, merci bien. Tu ne connais sinon pas qui était le photographe assis avec son ordinateur pas bien loin de la tribune des intervenants? Merci quand-même, bonne soirée ! --Floflo (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Le photographe qui était installé sur une table face au public à côté de la tribune, c'était moi. Donc peut-être voir avec Pymouss ou Lionel Allorge.

Ah ben je ne me suis pas complètement trompé en pensant à toi

Je me souviens que j'avais levé le pouce juste après la photo un peu pour dire "ouais, merci pour la photo!". Ce doit être Lionel Allorge alors, je connais Pymouss, ce n'était pas lui. Merci encore alors.! --Floflo (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello à nouveau, en tombant sur cette photo, je suis certain d'affirmer que le photographe est la personne assise sur cette photo. Juste par curiosité, c'est toi? --Floflo (talk) 10:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, c'est effectivement moi sur la photo, je regarderai donc sur mon pc portable et chargerai les photos de la salle sur picasa pour que tu puisses voir en espérant que je n'ai pas supprimé la photo car je la trouvai nulle, je te tiens au courant.

Ok ! Bah oui, c'est ce que je me suis dit aussi, que tu l'avais peut-être supprimée. Heureux d'apprendre que je t'ai cotoyé un petit moment alors ^^ Je pensais à vrai dire que tu n'étais pas un Wikipédien mais un professionnel engagé par l'asso ou par l'Assemblée N. De ce que je me souviens pour la photo, c'était donc samedi après-midi, t'étais devant ton ordi contre le mur, on s'est alors tous deux regardés (j'étais en face de toi, contre le mur), t'as alors pointé l'appareil vers moi (j'ai d'ailleurs dû sourire) et après que tu l'aies reposé j'ai levé le pouce un peu pour dire "bien joué" ou "bonne idée" ;) Même si tu n'as plus la photo, ça ne te parle pas? ^^ Bon, en tout cas c'est gentil de vouloir me faire voir les photos, même si je te crois quand tu me dis que tu as déjà tout vérifié. Mais merci bien quand-même. A+ :) --Floflo (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file uploaded by you is under deletion request[edit]

A file (or files) you uploaded from the Remote Sensing Tutorial from NASA Goddard Space Center has been tagged for deletion since that tutorial acknowledges that not all of the used images are actually NASA. (See here the overview of the tutorial). The group deletion request is here. Comments would be welcomed.--Garrondo (talk) 11:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation Wikimedia France[edit]

Bonjour Thesupermat.

Merci de ton message et de ton invitation.

Je ne suis qu'un amateur, un modeste contributeur de "Commons", qui apprécie la liberté qui règne dans cet espace contributif.

Je ne sais pas si je souhaite m'engager plus avant par une adhésion, je n'ai pas beaucoup de temps dans la "vie réelle".

(je n'aime pas cette expression, contribuer aux projets de Wikimédia, c'est "aussi" la vie réelle...)

Je vais continuer à réfléchir, et je conserve ton message avec les liens pour adhérer.

Je te le ferai savoir si je décide quelque chose

Merci encore.

--Jebulon (talk) 11:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re.

Tu es un bon démarcheur, tu dois travailler dans la publicité !!

Sache quand même que j'ai donné lors de l'appel de dons récent.

Oui, je sais, ce n'est pas la même chose, tu me parles de l'association française, mais quand même...

--Jebulon (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival automobile international 2011 - BMW 650i - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Coyau 19:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
QI. --Guzsik Dávid 20:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival automobile international 2011 - Mercedes CLS 350 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quimper - Statue de René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laennec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Rétromobile 2011 - Peugeot 604 GRDT Limousine Heuliez - 1982 - 003.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_020.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.102.172 14:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - giganotosaure - 020.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - giganotosaure - 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Source for the 1609 Quesnel map of Paris[edit]

The link which you provided as the source of File:Plan de Paris en 1609.jpg appears to be incorrect. Is it possible to correct it? (I realize it has been over a year since you uploaded it, but I thought you might still have the correct link somewhere or know where to find it.) Thanks for help. --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ouverture_page_Paris.JPG[edit]

File:Ouverture_page_Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Avron (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blancpain Endurance Series - Ford GT - 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blancpain Endurance Series - Lamborghini Murcielago 670 R-SV 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Lambardo.--PetarM 21:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blancpain Endurance Series - Audi R8 LMS - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of a tight crop at the bottom, but ok. Mattbuck 11:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rétromobile 2011 - Ferrari 275 GTB - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather noisy, but generally ok. --Mattbuck 12:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blancpain Endurance Series - Audi R8 LMS et Corvette Z06 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rétromobile 2011 - Bugatti Type 40 Coupé Fiacre Bourak-de Costier - 1927 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 23:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rétromobile 2011 - Maserati 250F - 1954 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments crop a bit tight left but good--Jebulon 23:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rétromobile 2011 - Mercedes 300 SL - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments crop a bit tight, but ok --Ianare 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blancpain Endurance Series - BMW Z4 - 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 110 ans de l'automobile au Grand Palais - Arrol-Johnston 3 cylindres 20 CV limousine à toit démontable - 1904 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 110 ans de l'automobile au Grand Palais - Panhard et Levassor 7 CV bicylindre Voiturette par Clément-Rothschild - 1902 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 110 ans de l'automobile au Grand Palais - De Dion-Bouton Type G 4,5 CV vis-à-vis - 1900 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --D4m1en 13:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Visite encadrée des Appartements de la Reine[edit]

Bonjour !

Tu as fait part de ton intérêt pour une visite encadrée des Appartements de la Reine, afin de prendre des photos et des notes. Cette opération se déroulerait un mercredi. Je fais le tour des gens intéressés pour voir les dates de disponibilité de chacun.

Es-tu toujours de la partie ? Si oui, merci de me préciser tes disponibilités.

A bientôt, Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 16:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salon du livre de Paris 2011 - Hervé Bourhis - 003.jpg[edit]

Cette photo ne représente pas Hervé Bourhis.

Hervé à la 30 ène alors que la photo représente un vieux d'une 60 ène d'année.

voilà une vrais photo d'hervé bourhis :

http://www.shunrize.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/herve-bourhis-portrait.jpg

merci de supprimer l'image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benlebegue (talk • contribs)

Il semblerait qu'il y ait deux personnes s'appelant par ce nom.

Celui représenté sur la photo serait "Hervé Bourhis" dit Tétève, auteur de Roman Policier [1] [2]

l'article illustré sur Wikipédia ne semble pas être le bon.

Esby (talk) 20:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai renommé l'image en File:Salon du livre de Paris 2011 - Hervé Bourhis (Tétève) - 003.jpg et enlevé l'image sur l'article français associé à l'auteur de BD.

Esby (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris -Musée national du Moyen-âge - Triptyque - Scène de l'enfance et de la Passion du Christ - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good overall quality. --Tomer T 09:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris -Musée national du Moyen-âge - Vierge à l'Enfant - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ian McEwan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris -Musée national du Moyen-âge - Plaque - Saint Paul - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 14:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Plafond du dôme des Invalides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMHO good enough for QI --Berthold Werner 10:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Dôme des Invalides - Tombeau de Napoléon - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good in my opinion. The crop at the bottom had to be a compromise, of course, and perspective effects are unavoidable with this scene. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - enclos paroissial - détail du calvaire - 014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment A picture without a caption, has no interest in our project. We do not know what one looks, neither the place nor the time nor the dimenssions. Shame because the picture is good. --Archaeodontosaurus 08:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The caption is in the image name, but the description could be better indeed. Please add geolocation. Very good image. / Très belle photo. Prière de compléter la description et d'ajouter les coordonnées géographiques (longitude et latitude). -- MJJR 20:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liste de discussion Wikimedia Pays de Brest[edit]

Rejoignez la liste brest@wikimedia.fr. Cette liste permettra de communiquer sur des actions telles que cette collecte, de travailler ensemble sur d’autres projets comme Brest 2012, de proposer des rencontres et de réfléchir aux partenariats possibles avec l'association Wikimedia France. Merci de me faire savoir si vous souhaitez être inscrit, car pour l’instant seuls les abonnés de l’association Wikimedia France peuvent directement s’abonner à la liste.

Source a-brest.net

--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crottins_de_chèvre_-_004.JPG[edit]

File:Crottins_de_chèvre_-_004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Plougoulm_-_Gouel_an_Eost_2011_-_Remplacement_du_fer_d'un_cheval_étape_1.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_microraptor_-_008.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_microraptor_-_008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - Afrocubism en concert le 6 août- 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanvec - ossuaire - 002.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Thesupermat,

L'image susmentionnée est très jolie mais tu as oublié d'insérer la description. Dès que tu auras mis cette description, je voterai pour la promouvoir.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photo - Festival de Cornouaille 2011 - Nolwenn Leroy en concert le 22 juillet - 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - Moriarty le 6 août- 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - I Muvrini en concert le 6 août- 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - Professor en concert le 6 août- 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 18:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - Moussu T e lei Jovents en concert le 6 août- 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 18:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival du bout du Monde 2011 - Bernard Lavilliers en concert le 6 août- 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 18:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanvec - ossuaire - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 10:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - enclos paroissial - l'église - 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. Good, but... CAs on the shades of the roof?--Lmbuga 18:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - enclos paroissial - l'église - 010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Oui.--Jebulon 15:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

chatsam et Wiki loves monument[edit]

coucou,

En fait sur mon mac le lien du wikilove ne fonctionnait pas donc j'ai chargé mes photos sans mettre le modèle. Une fois les 300 images uploadées, je n'ai pas eu envie de me les faire une par une pour mettre le modèle et puis si cela peut éviter de surcharger le jury ce n'est pas plus mal. Si tu en as vue qui te plaise n'hésite pas à mettre le bandeau si tu veux. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

je sais pas si "Jean-Frédéric" est un faux nez ou qq1 avec qui tu parles sur un autre canal

mais si le but est de faire du chiffre pour le wiki loves il a oublié les photos du palais bourbon et celle de Beauvais en début de mois. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

excuse moi j'ai peut être été maladroite en parlant de faux nez (ce n'était pas une accusation), je trouvais bizarre que tu m'en parles et que qq1 d'autre mette justement le bandeau sur toutes les pages de quai d’orsay et de l’eglise de belloy. désolé --Chatsam (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear Thesupermat,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reproduction_d'iguanodon.JPG[edit]

File:Reproduction_d'iguanodon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 09:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dôme des invalides[edit]

Tes photos du dôme des invalides sont superbes. Pour les passer en QI par contre je passerai un coup de correction de perspective, je ai testé sur Paris - Les invalides - Le Dôme - 123-1.jpg et je trouve que cela rend mieux, après c'est toi qui voit ^_^. En tout cas merci encore pour ces jolies photos, ça fait longtemps que j'ai pas été à Paris et ça fait plaisir à regarder. PierreSelim (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Pont Alexandre III - 231.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 10:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Pont Alexandre III - 256.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 10:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Au service des Tsars - Nicolas 1er - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 10:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les invalides - Le Dôme - 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments schön unsymmetrisch --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les invalides - Le Dôme - 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentI fixed the distortion. --PierreSelim 16:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Good quality. --PierreSelim 16:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Hôtel du Châtelet - 127 rue de Grenelle - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 12:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Pharmacie - 151 rue de Grenelle - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 12:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les invalides - Escaliers Est - 141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Althought one blown out window I really like the setting. Mvg, Basvb 08:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Hôtel de Gournay - 1 rue Saint-Dominique - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 22:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tête_de_brachiosaure.JPG[edit]

File:Tête_de_brachiosaure.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_oviraptor_-_012.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_oviraptor_-_012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_carnotaurus_-_017.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_carnotaurus_-_017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_gallimimus_-_011.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_gallimimus_-_011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_019.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_021.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_giganotosaure_-_021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reproduction_d'oviraptor.JPG[edit]

File:Reproduction_d'oviraptor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reproduction_de_velociraptor.JPG[edit]

File:Reproduction_de_velociraptor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église - 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 23:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église - 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also QI for me -- Achim Raschka 10:09, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:POPB 2.jpg

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église - 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 21:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Opéra en plein air - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Dôme des Invalides - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:34, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Versailles - La Clarté - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Collège des Bernanrdins - Statue sans tête - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support il est possible qu'elle n'est pas de bras! --Archaeodontosaurus 10:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint Louis des Invalides - Gisant - 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality to me--Lmbuga 22:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint Louis des Invalides - 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Focus finder 09:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint Louis des Invalides - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No bad but blown out window. --Berthold Werner 18:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint-Louis des Invalides - L'orgue - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is quite well executed. Details are generally good although some colour noise in the shadows. A bit of perspective distortion but it does not detract from the image. Compostion is excellent -- Saffron Blaze 14:22, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint Louis des Invalides - Gisant - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't like the composition, but thats matter of opinion - the quality is impressive! --Haeferl 19:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Saint Louis des Invalides - 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Oui. --Jebulon 22:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_un_stégosaure_-_002.jpg[edit]

File:Paris_porte_de_Versailles_-_Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures_-_un_stégosaure_-_002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bonhams - The Paris Sale 2012 - Delahaye 135M Cabriolet - 1946[edit]

Hello Thesupermat!

Can you write a short description for the categories you have created? According to COM:CAT this is required and in addition it makes it easier for other users to navigate throught categories - especially if they are not experts on some topic. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reproduction d'euoplocephalus.JPG[edit]

File:Reproduction d'euoplocephalus.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - lambéosaure - 013.jpg[edit]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - lambéosaure - 013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonhams - The Paris Sale 2012 - Bentley R-Type Petersen 6½-Litre Supercharged Road Racer - 1953 (2003) - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival automobile international 2012 - Renault Sherpa light Scout - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - Allosaure - 001.jpg[edit]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - Allosaure - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.139.62 19:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Renault Alpine - 025.jpg[edit]

Hello Supermat, first of all thanks for all of the lovely pictures from Rétromobile. A quick question: I believe that the linked file is actually an Alpine A108, but am not certain enough to just move it on my own. Any possibility that you could shed some light upon this? mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 16:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Moteur Renault 9F - cylindres en étoile - 1934 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 10:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Camélia Jordana - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 10:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Bugatti type 57SC Atlantic - 1936 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Hispano-Suiza type H6 C - 1938 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Carschten 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Brabham BMW BT7 - 1965 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - BMW 328 - Modèle réduit - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Sauber Mercedes C9 - 1989 - 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Renault Alpine - 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Renault Alpine - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival automobile international 2012 - Peugeot 508 RHX - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festival automobile international 2012 - Peugeot 508 RHX - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Bentley TT 3 Litres - 1921 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality images[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai remarqué que vous posté quelque chose comme 20 images à la page Qualité Images aujourd'hui. Bien qu'il n'y ait pas de règle explicite contre cela, il est généralement considéré comme une mauvaise forme pour ajouter plus de 4 ou 5 en une seule journée. Merci. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vous pouvez également envisager d'archiver cette page, car il est assez long. S'il vous plaît voir Commons:Bien utiliser les pages de discussion.. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Besançon - 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Besançon - 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and interesting--Jebulon 16:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Besançon - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 16:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Besançon - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unsufficient description. It is not "Besançon", but a model of a church... --Jebulon 10:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Désolé, je ne peux pas être plus précis --Thesupermat 14:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Pas besoin, c'est très bien.--Jebulon 16:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Matthieu Jung - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite good --PierreSelim 16:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tête de tyrannosaure.JPG[edit]

File:Tête de tyrannosaure.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tête de tyranosaure au palais de la découverte.JPG[edit]

File:Tête de tyranosaure au palais de la découverte.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Cherbourg - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Cherbourg - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Briançon - 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Briançon - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le Grand Palais - La France en relief - Briançon - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Philippe Lefait - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition. --Vassil 21:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batterie d'honneur de l'artillerie française - Investiture présidentielle du 15 mai 2012 - 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bat quality (the second bullet is out of focus) --Orikrin1998 09:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - troodons - 016.jpg[edit]

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - troodons - 016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures[edit]

Category:Exposition_le_temps_des_dinosaures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:17, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batterie d'honneur de l'artillerie française - Investiture présidentielle du 15 mai 2012 - 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cool. --Mattbuck 16:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Paul Dubois - Ève naissante - 1873 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Hélène Bertaux - Psyché sous l'empire du mystère - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think, a meaningful English file description is a necessary prerequisite for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Done. Please see file description page.--Jebulon 23:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rétromobile 2011 - Fardier de Cugnot - 001.jpg [edit]

This file has no description, and may be lacking other information. And another files in this category has no description too by the way.

Please provide a meaningful description of this file. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 08:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sous l'égide de Mars - Colletin dit de Louis XIII - 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Paul Dubois - Ève naissante - 1873 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Kenzaburō Ōe - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality. --ArildV 16:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sous l'égide de Mars - Colletin dit de Louis XIII - 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice subject, good capture, but the background needs to be denoised before promotion IMO. Categorization could be better, and caption too.--Jebulon 10:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC) - Done retraité par DxO, sachant que je ne fait aucune compression jpeg à partir de mes RAW, cela peut expliquer la sensation de grain qui n'est en aucun cas du bruit numérique. La description et la catégorisation ont également été précisées. --Thesupermat 08:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC). Wrong caption (corrected, que je sois pendu si Louis XIII ressemblait à ça ! C'est le portrait de son père, Henri IV !), but good for QI.--Jebulon 09:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Jean Carriès - Masques accolés - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest - Fête de la musique 2012 - Goulven Ka - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Saint Jean l'évangéliste - 16ème siècle - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but good--Jebulon 23:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Jean Carriès - Masque d'horreur - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I find this good.--Jebulon 16:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Jean Carriès - Masque d'horreur - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Jean Carriès - Masque de jeune fille - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Petit Palais - Protome de Déméter - IVème siècle avant JC - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilovesmonuments 2012[edit]

Merci pour ton message.

Je compte bien participer à Wikilovesmonuments 2012 mais je trouverai dommage de ne charger des images de M.H. qu'à cette occasion. J'ai déjà participé en 2011, mais je préfère inscrire ma contribution au projet M.H. dans la durée, tout au long de l'année. C'est l'occasion de quelques belles balades, actuellement dans ma région natale où je travaille, mais par toute la France aussi, au gré de ma fantaisie ... et de mes vacances. L'essentiel pour moi n'est pas d'espérer naïvement gagner le concours mais d'y participer et d'être un vecteur parmi tant d'autres d'émulation. Certes, attendre permettrait de gonfler les statistiques françaises ... mais je dois confesser avoir encore pas mal de clichés en réserve ... En tous les cas, je suis très touché de tes encouragements. A bientôt, sur Wikipédia, Commons ou au pied d'un M.H., derrière mon appareil photo ...--GO69 (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Commons Barnstar
		For all the great images you've uploaded. Your contributions are appreciated. INeverCry 21:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taio Cruz on stage.jpg[edit]

File:Taio Cruz on stage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Jean-Paul Krassinsky - 001.jpg[edit]

File:Paris - Salon du livre 2012 - Jean-Paul Krassinsky - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

82.123.154.190 13:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beynac-et-Cazenac - Château de Beynac - PA00082380 - 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice pic of a nice place, in difficult lighting conditions.--Jebulon 09:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Façade du Petit Palais - PA00088878 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality but it needs a more accurate description. --Selbymay 18:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biron - Le château - PA00082386 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - La chapelle Saint Louis - PA00114578 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest - Le Château - PA00089847 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Llorenzi 14:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest - Le Château - PA00089847 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brest - Le Château - PA00089847 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Une Sphinge - PA00114578 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 11:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Château d'Enghien - PA00114578 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Le hameau - PA00114578 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Very nice, but imho needs perspective distortion correction --Iifar 16:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Je m'en occupes dès que j'ai le temps.--Thesupermat 08:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC) Done--Thesupermat 11:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC) Support --Iifar 11:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Proserpine par Chapu - PA00114578 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photo - Festival de Cornouaille 2012 - Graeme Allwright en concert le 28 juillet - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good IMO. --Selbymay 17:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Vestibule d'Honneur - La rambarde - PA00114578 - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 12:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donzy - Eglise Notre-Dame du Pré - PA00112880 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 12:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Vue extérieure - PA00114578 - 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft, but nice picture. It's a copy of Michelangelo's Dying Slave, btw. --Jastrow 07:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernée - Notre Dame de Charne - Vitraux - PA00109503 - 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le calvaire - PA00089998 - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Selbymay 08:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Cour de la Capitainerie - PA00114578 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Le cloître - PA00082415 - 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Le cloître - PA00082415 - 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le calvaire - PA00089998 - 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le calvaire - PA00089998 - 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le calvaire - PA00089998 - 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 11:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Cour de la Capitainerie - PA00114578 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shadow rather disturbing, imo. - A.Savin 17:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Céki ?--Jebulon 10:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Après recherche, c'est Anne d’Autriche (p.10)--Thesupermat 12:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK to me. Mattbuck 23:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chantilly - Cour de la Capitainerie - PA00114578 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Céki ?--Jebulon 10:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Après recherche, c'est Henri II (p.10)--Thesupermat 12:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK to me. Mattbuck 23:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernée - Notre Dame de Charne - Vitraux - PA00109503 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a slight perspective correction IMO--Jebulon 14:49, 15 October 2012 (UTC) Done--Thesupermat 12:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell the cathedral people they need to remove the spider webs. Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernée - Notre Dame de Charne - Vitraux - PA00109503 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernée - Notre Dame de Charne - Vitraux - PA00109503 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Sculpture du cloître - PA00082415 - 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Sculpture du cloître - PA00082415 - 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le portail - Statue du piédroit - PA00089998 - 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimiliau - Enclos paroissial - le portail - Statue du piédroit - PA00089998 - 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Thesupermat,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Halle de Cadouin - PA00082421 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 14:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église Notre-Dame - PA00090020 - 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 19:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Faou - Église Saint-Sauveur - PA00089925 - 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Faou - Église Saint-Sauveur - PA00089925 - 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Sculpture du cloître - PA00082415 - 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing special but good enough. --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Sculpture du cloître - PA00082415 - 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing special but good enough. --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Sculpture du cloître - PA00082415 - 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing special but good enough. --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église Notre-Dame - PA00090020 - 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments St Louis of France.--Jebulon 17:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please try to help reviewers by giving different names to files to be assessed, Thank you.--Jebulon 18:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 en France, « Coup de cœur du jury »[edit]

Tes photos de mascarons des invalides ont été appréciés dans leur ensemble et le jury français te décerne le prix « Coup de cœur du jury » pour cet ensemble de photos. Tu as au passage gagné un ~~T-Shirt~~ chèque cadeau de 100€ pour du matos photos et le droit (et/ou l'obligation) de venir à la cérémonie de remises des prix ^_^

Cordialement (j'en fais pas trop ?), --PierreSelim (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampaul-Guimiliau - Église Notre-Dame - PA00090020 - 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 11:38 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 11:38 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 11:38 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morlaix - Viaduc - PA00090137 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mayenne - Chapelle Saint-Léonard - PA00109560 - PA00088878 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 21:18 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Cathédrale Notre-Dame - Portail de la Vierge - PA00086250 - 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction. Mattbuck 14:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Mattbuck 10:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Je rentre de vacance, je m'en occupe le plus rapidement possible--Thesupermat 15:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Thesupermat 21:04, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still a bit distorted out at the bottom right, but good enough. Mattbuck 03:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Buisson-de-Cadouin - Abbaye de Cadouin - Vitraux de l'église abbatiale - PA00082415 - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Saint Bernard of Clairvaux. Please help for ID and categorization !--Jebulon 17:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A bit too much perspective correction on this one I think - it leans in a bit on the left towards the bottom. Mattbuck 14:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Mattbuck 10:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Je rentre de vacance, je m'en occupe le plus rapidement possible--Thesupermat 15:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Thesupermat 21:04, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 03:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Grand Palais - Statue - PA00088877 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Super !--Jebulon 23:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Intérieur du Petit - PA00088878 - 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Grand Palais - Statue - PA00088877 - 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 19:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Intérieur du Petit - PA00088878 - 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not my taste in painting, but good QI.--Jebulon 17:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Aimé Millet - Cassandre se met sous la protection de Pallas - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Lothar Spurzem 20:40 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Ambrogio Parisi - Jules César - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ave, Caesar, promoturi te salutant.--Jebulon 17:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Antoine André - Flore Farnèse - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel - PA00085992 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 15:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Etienne Jules Ramay - Thésée combattant le Minotaure - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though the sky is a bit noisy. --NorbertNagel 18:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coquille sur le peigne[edit]

Un reste de copier-coller malheureux, merci ^^ Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Julien Toussait Roux - La Comédie - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK (though the sky looks not so good either) - A.Savin 11:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Jean Raon - L'Hiver - PA00085992 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Lorenzo Ottone - Le Nil - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Pavillon de Marsan - PA00085992 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Louis Auguste Lévêque - Nymphe - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Strong noise level on the sky. Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Nicolas Coustou - La Seine et la Marne - PA00085992 - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Henri Vidal - Caïn venant de tuer son frère Abel - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good although a posterized sky. --Selbymay 13:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Comment Sky denoised. --Iifar 18:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurélie Filippetti - Semanticpedia 2012 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good colors, nice bokeh. Possibily the highlights on the skin could be minimized and the brightness of the eyes increased. --Tuxyso 20:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Thesupermat 07:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see not a real improvement. I think you reduced the overall brightness. Eyes are still to dark. I suggest to make selective corrections (s. notes). --Tuxyso 12:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mais pour la couleur des yeux, je n'y arrive pas.--Thesupermat 16:51, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me now. --Tuxyso 08:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Pierre Bourdict - Le Tibre - PA00085992 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 13:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Laurent Honoré Marqueste - Le centaure Nessus enlevant Déjanire - PA00085992 - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Posterization on the sky. - A.Savin 11:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC) Info It looks more like a strong noise, new version uploaded. --Iifar 19:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, the image has a sufficient quality now. - A.Savin 23:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Dôme des Invalides - PA00088714 - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Jardin des Tuileries - Sébastien Slodtz - Hannibal - PA00085992 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 17:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanseverino[edit]

Salut,

Je n’ai pas trop compris ce que tu as essayé de faire sur Sanseverino (blanchiement de la redirection puis catégorisation de la page vide). En attendant, je suis revenu au redirect qui me semble plus logique pour une page vide. Ne pensais-tu pas plutôt à faire une page d’homonymie ? (sauf que je ne me souviens jamais de comment on fait les pages de disambig sur Commons).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:45, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Kadellar 13:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Façade nord - Mascarons - 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Façade nord - Statue de Mars - 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Façade nord - Statue de Minerve - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 10:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 19:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Montreuil - Salon du livre jeunesse 2011 - Lilidoll - 001.jpg[edit]

File:Montreuil - Salon du livre jeunesse 2011 - Lilidoll - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

82.239.70.64 14:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roscoff - Eglise Notre-Dame de Croaz-Batz - PA00090402 - 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me, despite difficult conditions. --JLPC 21:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roscoff - Eglise Notre-Dame de Croaz-Batz - PA00090402 - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quimper - Cathédrale Saint-Corentin - Portail - PA00090326 - 0001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quimper - Cathédrale Saint-Corentin - Portail - Statue du Christ - PA00090326 - 0001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Très bien !--Jebulon 18:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Place de la Concorde - PA00088875 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plouezoc'h - Château du Taureau - PA00090226 - 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Frustrating crop at left, and ugly flags (not your fault), but very good details level. I like very much the different textures of stones.--Jebulon 17:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Façade nord - Statue de Mars - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Façade nord - Statue de Mars - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Le pont Alexandre III - PA00088798 - 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Barely OK to me, although the sharpness could be better here as well. --A.Savin 11:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Père - Église Saint-Pierre-du-Trépas - PA00113011 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 13:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Père - Église Saint-Pierre-du-Trépas - PA00113011 - 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 13:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Père - Église Saint-Pierre-du-Trépas - PA00113011 - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 13:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plougouvelin - Abbaye Saint-Mathieu de Fine-Terre - PA29000050 - 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Vassil 19:52, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Les Invalides - Statue de Jules Hardouin-Mansart - PA00088714 - 0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit unsharp but ok. --Mattbuck 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plouezoc'h - Château du Taureau - PA00090226 - 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Borderline but ok. --Mattbuck 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]