User talk:SKraemer
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 15:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Bourbaki Congress.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Martin H. (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- The reason was: The author is still alive, no reason for pd-old. --Martin H. (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Andre Weil.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Book-Cover
[edit]Why do you delete that book-cover? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Gradshteyn_Ryzhik_5ed.jpg It is not possible to scan a cover for illustrating a page? --Skraemer (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, it's not allowed to upload images of bookcovers, because that would be fair use. As the headlline on COM:FU says: "Material under the fair use clause is not allowed on Commons"
- If you want to illustrate articles in wikipedia projects with fair use pictures you can upload it in that wikipedia project (of course only if it's allowed - as it in on en.wikipedia.org .
- Commons is made only for images wich are totally free (f.e. pictures licenced under GFDL, CC (without cc-by-nc cc-by-nd or mixes with the nc or the nd retriction), CL, PD and other free licences.)
- --D-Kuru (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Das klingt sehr kompliziert und ich kenne mich da überhaupt nicht aus. Ist es also ein Problem des US-Rechts bezüglich commons?
Also kann ich das Bild auf de.wikipedia hochladen?
Das Problem ist sehr sperrig, der Autor des Buches wird das Covers seines Buches kaum selbst hochladen (Eigenwerbung) und auch keine Zeit hat sich hier einzuarbeiten. Wie ist das mit den Covern bei de:Buddenbrooks? --Skraemer (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Es ist nicht speziell ein Problem des US-Rechtes. Hier ein Zitat aus der von der deutschen Wikipediaseite von Fair Use: "Als Fair Use (dt.:„Angemessene Verwendung“) bezeichnet man eine Rechtsdoktrin des anglo-amerikanischen Copyright-Systems, die bestimmte, nicht autorisierte Nutzungen von geschütztem Material zugesteht, sofern sie der öffentlichen Bildung und der Anregung geistiger Produktionen dienen." Meiner Meinung nach schließt diese klausel allerdings eine komerzielle nutzung, bzw. (starke) veränderung des Inhaltes aus (Auf die veränderung des Inhaltes wird ein paar zeielen weoter unten eingegangen). Das was auf in der Hilfeseite von "FAQ zu Bildern" beim Punkt Welche Lizenzen sind frei für die Wikipedia? steht kann man eigentlich fast eins zu eins auf Commons übertragen.
- Der Unterschied zischen deinen Bildern und denen die im Artikel Buddenbrooks zu finden sind ist dieser Brief. Dieser Brief stammt vom S. Fischer Verlag welcher schreibt: "Von unserer Seite besteht kein Einwand gegen eine Abbildung der Erstdruckumschläge in Ihren Wikipedia-Beiträgen". Wenn man genau ist müsste man eigentlich noch einen Brief/Mail schreiben indem nachgefragt wird, ob die Bilder komerziell genutzt und verändert werden dürfen. Wie H.-P.Haack richtig geschrieben hat: "Die Zusage der S. Fischer Verlage betrifft Wikipedia, doch kann stillschweigend unterstellt werden, dass sie auch für das Schwesterprojekt Wikimedia Commons gilt, das als Bild-Archiv für Wikipedia genutzt wird." Ich bin nicht ganz genau der selben Ansicht. Allerdings vermeide ich solche Konfrontationen aus zwei Gründen: Wo kein Kläger da kein Richter (-> Wenn sich niemand aufregt, dass das Bild komerziell genutz wird, bzw. verändert wird ist alles im grünen Bereich) und abgesehen davon hab ich viel mehr zu tun als nur danach zu suchen, dass Buchumschläge richtig lizensiert werden.
- Da der Autor (so scheint mir) seine zustimmung zur veröffentlichung zu den buchcovern nicht geben hat, galube ich nicht, dass es erlaubt ist sie auf de.wikipedia hochzuladen. Du kannst dem Autor (oder besser dem Verlag) einen Brief/Mail schreiben und fragen, ob du die Bilder hochladen kannst. Du solltest aber explizit darauf hinweisen, dass - wenn man die Bilder unter einen freien Lizenz veröffentlicht - man die Bilder dann komerziell nutzen und verändern kann. Damit sich das ganze nicht so drastisch anhört kannst du es mit beispielen abschwächen. Z.B. komerzielle Nutzung heißt auch eine Zusammenfassung in einem Magazin, dass du am Zeitungsstand kaufen kannst, wo dieses Bild drin abgedruckt ist. Verändert wird das Bild auch, wenn man das Bild mit anderen Buchcovern auf eine Seite bzw. zu einem neuen Bild zusammenfügt um etwa das Lebenswerk des Autor chronologisch aufzulisten oder das Buch mit anderen Büchern zu vergleichen.
- Ich hoffe die situation is jetzt etwas klarer für dich, trotz des etwas längeren Textes.
- --D-Kuru (talk) 07:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:R-Lunge.jpg is uncategorized since 4 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Max Koecher Hel Braun.jpeg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Max Koecher 3.jpeg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Max Koecher 2.jpeg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Herste Rommenhoeller Denkmal.jpeg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Höxter Weinbergkapelle 1857.JPG is uncategorized since 8 April 2009.
- Image:Hoelderlin 1792.jpg is uncategorized since 14 April 2009.
- Image:Hoelderlin Grab.jpg is uncategorized since 14 April 2009.
- Image:Ernst Christian Julius Schering.jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009.
- Image:Smirnow WI.jpg is uncategorized since 13 June 2009.
- Image:Martin Wilhelm Kutta.jpg is uncategorized since 29 June 2009.
- Image:Gaussturm01.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
- Image:Gaußturm02.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
- Image:Gaußturm01.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
- Image:Goodall Frederick.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:Karlshafen Batty1 col.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:Goodall Frederick 1880.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
- Image:Weierstrass Voigtlaender.jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:HolmboeBM2.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:CorveyDreizehnlinden2.jpg was uncategorized on 13 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Huinschenburg01.jpg was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Hamm Bergamt 1918.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Hamm Bergamt 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:R-Lunge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:R-Lunge.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
85.177.184.96 06:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Friedrich_Adolf_Willers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Paulae (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden.
|
Vielen Dank, dass du File:Herste Rommenhoeller Denkmal.jpeg hochgeladen hast. Du hast eine Quelle für das Bild angegeben, aber leider fehlt eine Bestätigung, dass der Autor oder Bildrechteinhaber des Bildes der Nutzung unter der angegebenen Lizenz zustimmt.
Bitte gib den Link zu der Webadresse an, die die entsprechenden Lizenzinformationen enthält. Solltest du über eine schriftliche Genehmigung zur Nutzung des Bildes verfügen, sende bitte eine Kopie davon an das Wikimedia-Support-Team, damit die Genehmigung archiviert werden kann. Bitte beachte, dass das Bild ohne die Bestätigung nach einer Woche schnellgelöscht werden kann. Vielen Dank. |
--:bdk: 11:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Kam Solusar (talk) 03:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Smirnow WI.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Smirnow WI.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Smirnow WI.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alex Spade (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:K.Meese Weserbergland.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:K.Meese Weserbergland.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:K.Meese Weserbergland.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Du brauchst die schriftliche Erlaubnis des Malers (oder seiner Nachfahren), da er nicht >70 Jahre tot sein kann. Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ich bin da nicht so sicher. Der Maler hat das Gemälde unzureichend signiert. Der Maler K. Meese (?) ist nirgendwo zu finden. Wenn der Maler Interesse hat auf seinem de:Verwertungsrecht zu bestehen, muß er das Bild ordentlich signieren. Ein Gemäde eines unbekannten Laien(?)-Malers vom Flohmarkt für 20 EUR ist m.E. keiner Diskussion fähig. Auch soll mit der Veröffentlichung dem Maler Gelegenheit gegeben werde sich zu melden. Dies rechtfertigt die Veröffentlichung im Interesse der Kunstgeschichte. --Skraemer (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Blumenthal_Otto.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
77.23.215.24 04:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Heinrich Christian Schumacher 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vsop.de (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:George David Birkhoff 1.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:George David Birkhoff 1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
shizhao (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
File:K.Meese Weserbergland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dehio (talk) 11:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Pont Argenteuil Sisley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 22:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Pont Argenteuil Caillebotte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |