User talk:Vassil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Vassil!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)





QI Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

grendel|khan 03:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Petting: yes; pets: no[edit]

Hi. Thanks for adding categories to the images I uploaded. I regret to inform you, however, that in the interest of accuracy, you will probably need to recategorize most of them. Those are not pets, they are wild animals who converge on my backyard and while, indeed, I have been privileged enough to be able to pet some of them, their home in the forest, and unlike Kitty, they do not depend on me for food and shelter. Also, I feel I should point out that the creature in this and many other similar images is not a squirrel, but rather, a chipmunk (much smaller, timid). See this image, for example, as a frame of reference to compare between the two. Many thanks. Best, ElC 15:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again and thanks for the prompt response. I replied on my talk page. Best, ElC 20:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]



Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale d'Auch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Mars 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cornély 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Antique dolls.[edit]

But don't you know which country's doll are these? It is can be a help for viewers. --Beyond silence 04:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Well, I took the picture in a stand during an exhibition.It was in France, but it doesn't mean that the dolls are French, and I didn't want to bore the antiquarian with questions, just because she authorized me to take pictures. But I am sure that these dolls are old, I suppose they are from the second half of the 19th century. Vassil 12:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]



Can you help on overexpod parts? Otherwise I can promote it. --Beyond silence 00:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great! My plesure. --Beyond silence 03:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND Amiens gargouilles 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agate de l'Esterel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitraux Cathédrale d'Auch 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND de Tronoën Portail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Finistère .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}



Image:Notre-Dame-de-Roscudon 060706.jpg[edit]

Please can you write an English Description? Thanks --Beyond silence 03:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC) It's done (for other pics of this church too). Thank you for rewiewing my pictures. Vassil 17:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siamang 140804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grues couronnées 140808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abreuvoir 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-de-Roscudon 060706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suricate 140803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mara Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gnou Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodochrosite 2581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Servals Thoiry 19801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Framboise Margy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danburite 2581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gibbon Amiens 26873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg[edit]

Can you see new edit of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg? Do you see marks on the sky? Thank you very much --Beyond silence 08:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't you like vote? --Beyond silence 19:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Hôtel de Ville 24972 C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheval de bois 281072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion (23)[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Génie de la Liberté 971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}







Could you please give further indication on the location of this chapelle or its name? There are probably hundreds of them in Finistère, so the image is unlikely to be used in an encyclopedical article without this info... Thanks, --Jul 16:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC) It's done. Vassil 13:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gargouille Saint-Urbain Troyes 110208 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

-- kind of a sad way to be stuck for eternity.... carol 10:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Vassil!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Siebrand 20:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens[edit]

Permets-moi de te féliciter pour tes nombreuses photos et notamment celles de la cathédrale d'Amiens. J'ai remarqué que tu en avais publié de nouvelles ce 15 juin. Etant donné que je termine l'article en français concernant cette cathédrale, j'en ai déjà incorporé quelques-unes qui manquaient cruellement. Une question : tu as fait la photo d'une "Vierge à l'enfant" repertoriée Vierge Cathédrale d'Amiens 090608.jpg. Puis-je te demander où elle se situe dans la cathédrale, car je n'arrive pas à la retrouver dans ma documentation? Merci.

Encore une chose : d'après le nombre de tes photos d'Amiens, j'en déduis, peut-être erronément, que tu habites la région ou que tu y passes régulièrement. Si tu y repasses, serait-il possible de prendre une ou deux photos de la façade sud du transept et de l'intérieur de celui-ci (surtout la chapelle saint Sébastien, à l'angle du transept nord et du déambulatoire du choeur). Commons ne possède quasi rien sur ce transept, à part la rosace nord et la Vierge Dorée du portail sud. Excuses-moi de te déranger avec ça, mais je n'habite pas tout près (Bruxelles) et je suis handicapé des deux jambes, ce qui m'empêche totalement de marcher. A plus, j'espère.

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone.

91.177.141.125 13:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens (II)[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci beaucoup pour ta réponse à ma demande et à mon message. J'ai déjà incorporé certaines de tes nouvelles et très intéressantes photos (chapelle de S. Sébastien et monument J. de Sachy). Excuses-moi de t'avoir pris pour un habitant de la Somme. Puisque le transept sud de la cathédrale est en restauration, et que tu habites Reims, je me sens gêné de t'avoir sollicité . Excuses-moi encore. Ce que tu as fait est déjà formidable. Cependant si un jour, plus tard, tu passes par là, une bonne photo de cette façade sera toujours bienvenue. Encore merci,

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone.

91.176.129.73 07:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos de cathédrales[edit]

Rebonjour,

Merci pour tes derniers messages. Tu l'as peut-être constaté, tes dernières photos sont déjà intégrées dans l'article, qui commence à prendre ainsi une belle allure. Si j'ai un peu tardé à te répondre, c'est que j'ai beaucoup réfléchi à ta proposition de réaliser de nouvelles photos sur un autre site. Alors, disons que j'accepte avec enthousiasme. Mon problème est que je ne possède pas toujours de documentation suffisante pour écrire un article complet et valable. C'est le cas pour les cathédrales de Laon, Beauvais, Troyes, et surtout Reims, que j'aimerais un peu travailler.

Pour le moment, je me permets de te proposer une excursion à la Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Meaux, ville historiquement champenoise et non pas francilienne comme on le prétend actuellement, pour laquelle je possède une documentation valable, mais dont "Commons" ne possède que ... deux malheureuses photos. Un vrai désert pour lequel tout est à faire, tant l'intérieur que l'extérieur. J'avais commencé à étoffer l'article il y a peu, mais face à la pénurie de photos, j'avais suspendu ce projet. Comme cela correspond à ton rayon d'action, ce serait gentil d'y faire un petit tour quand tu en as le temps. C'est non seulement une superbe (petite) cathédrale gothique, mais aussi l'ancien évêché de Bossuet. Merci beaucoup d'avance et à plus,

Jdresse de Wikipédia francophone. 91.176.34.220 16:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens (III)[edit]

Bonjour, j'espère que tu vas bien,

Merci beaucoup pour ton message, et surtout félicitations pour la qualité des photos qui m'ont presque coupé le souffle...Je vais bientôt les introduire dans l'article qui, grâce à toi, est devenu un "must" pour ce qui concerne l'art baroque français. Et puis, merci pour les notices que tu as ajoutées aux photos ; elles me seront fort précieuses pour compléter les paragraphes concernant les diverses chapelles, car je compte remanier l'article, au vu de l'abondance de détails que tu me fournis. Il y a certains détails que je ne trouvais pas dans ma documentation et que tu explicites fort bien. Merci aussi d'avance pour Meaux. Je constate que tu es pleine de ressources, alors puisque tu es Rémoise, puis-je te demander, si un jour tu te promènes dans la campagne environnante (ou à Reims), de prendre une ou deux belles photos de la Vesle et de l'Ardre, son affluent (ou de n'importe quelle rivière de la région d'ailleurs). Il se fait que j'ai aussi écrit une série d'articles sur les rivières de Champagne (et d'un peu toute la France), mais ça manque cruellement de photos. Si ça ne te dis rien de le faire, ou si tu n'aimes pas prendre des photos de paysages, je ne serai pas vexé. J'espère ne pas t'ennuyer avec mes demandes. Surtout ne te déplaces pas rien que pour me faire plaisir. A bientôt j'espère.

jdresse 91.176.139.35 18:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée de Charles de Vitry Amiens 110608 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. -- א 13:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolée de Charles de Vitry Amiens 110608 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Très bien! (Well done!) --א 13:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Joseph Saint Luc Amiens 110608 01B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments meets QI requirements --Mbdortmund 01:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cathédrale de Meaux[edit]

Chère Vassil,

J'ai bien reçu ton message concernant ta visite à Meaux, et je t'en remercie. Ravi aussi d'apprendre que l'excursion t'a plu, et soulagé, car c'est épatant de pouvoir joindre l'utile à l'agréable. Tes photos sont superbes. Elles m'ont appris qu'il existait des gargouilles mâles et ce sont les premières photos de celles-ci que je découvre. Félicitations aussi pour tes photos primées de la cathédrale d'Amiens. Je vais, bien sûr, les intégrer toutes dans l'article. Il me faut d'abord terminer un travail engagé fin juin et concernant les cours d'eau français et wallons, et dès ce week-end, je reprendrai les articles sur les cathédrales.

A bientôt j'espère,

Jdresse 91.177.136.124 12:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS : Sans vouloir t'importuner, quelques photos des portails et chapelles de Notre-Dame de Laon seraient aussi les bienvenues... C'est un article auquel je réfléchis depuis deux trois mois, et puisque c'est assez proche de Reims, je me permets de t'en faire part. En fait, je vise toutes les cathédrales de la moitié nord de la France (surtout les gothiques), mais c'est un travail extrêmement long et complexe. Ainsi, j'ai travaillé plus de 400 heures rien que sur Amiens, et autant pour Notre-Dame de Paris...et ce n'est pas terminé. Bonne journée

Vézelay[edit]

Rebonjour,

J'ai oublié de te parler de Vézelay. D'abord, mes félicitations pour les fort belles photos que tu y a prises. A part la rubrique historique, l'article est très sommaire et nécessite un "lifting" très important. C'est malheureusement le cas de quantité d'articles sur les édifices religieux (et pas seulement dans la wikipédia francophone...). Je vais me réserver quelques heures ou quelques jours dans les prochaines semaines pour tenter d'améliorer cela, d'autant plus que ça me fait plaisir que tu t'adresses à moi pour le faire. Ça me permet de te faire plaisir à mon tour. Et puis un monument aussi superbe que la Basilique de Vézelay mérite bien un peu d'attention. Mon problème est que je m'y connais moins bien en art roman. Mais heureusement j'ai un peu de documentation sur les principales églises bourguignonnes. J'ai d'ailleurs travaillé sur les cathédrales de Sens et d'Auxerre (qui elles manquent cruellement de photos...). Bref, à plus,

Jdresse 91.176.35.188 08:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re-Vézelay, Ardre et Notre-Dame d'Amiens[edit]

Bonjour, j'espère que tes vacances se passent bien (si tu es en vacances),

J'ai analysé à fond le cas Vézelay et décider de développer cet article prioritairement, étant donnée la quantité énorme de photos qui dorment dans commons (dont 75 sont tiennes), et l'absence totale de développement de cet article depuis un an ou deux. Si tu y jettes un coup d'oeil, tu verras que j'ai déja intégré une série de tes photos, au niveau des portails du narthex notamment. Mais ce n'est qu'un début, car je vais bientôt aborder les chapiteaux. Tes chapit~eaux sont superbes et très intéressants, alors j'ai décidé de foncer...

Concernant l'Ardre, j'ai épluché les libellés comme tu me l'avais demandé. Il y a, à mon avis, une erreur de localisation du pont qui fait la limite entre les sections de première et de deuxième catégorie, car l'Ardre ne passe pas à Méry-Prémécy, mais à Faverolles-Coëmy. Un arrêté préfectoral de la Marne que j'ai trouvé sur internet précise de fait que cette limite se trouve au pont de Faverolles. Et cela correpond bien à ce qui est dessiné sur la carte Michelin. Peux-tu rectifier la légende? Il y aurait dès lors le même problème au niveau de la station d'épuration.

Enfin pour Amiens, je t'avais posé la question concernant l'endroit où se trouve la Vierge Vierge Cathédrale d'Amiens 090608.jpg. Je pense qu'elle est située au niveau inférieur du puissant contrefort nord ou gauche édifié fin du XIVe siècle, sous le règne de Charles V, pour éviter l'écroulement de la tour nord. Penses-tu que c'est juste ? Merci de rassembler tes souvenirs.
De plus, en relisant un ancien message, j'ai lu que tu retournerais à Amiens cet été. Si c'est le cas, puis-je te demander de prendre une ou deux photos de cet énorme contrefort très orné, paraît-il, et qui comporte outre la Vierge et deux saints, les statues du roi Charles V (très rare) et de ses deux fils, dont le dauphin, futur Charles VI. Ce serait génial d'avoir une photo de ces deux rois. Ils se situent au dessus du niveau de la Vierge c'est-à-dire au deuxième niveau. Je n'ai trouvé nulle part la moindre photo de ce coin là.

Merci d'avance et encore tous mes compliments pour les photos de Vézelay et d'ailleurs,

Signé Jdresse - 91.176.34.39 09:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale de Meaux Vitrail Marie 290708 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Berthold Werner 15:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale de Meaux Vitrail Marie 290708 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Berthold Werner 15:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vierge à l'Enfant Laon 150808 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice looking with no flaws! Mrmariokartguy 23:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Façade Cathédrale de Laon Hippopotame 14 09 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good picture . interesting motive --Mbdortmund 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orgue Cathédrale de Laon 140908 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC) "Good" is not a proper review. Mrmariokartguy 14:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Still better than your discuss reason. Changed back to Promotion. --Dschwen 17:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 190908 Passerelle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture, but could you perhaps add a geocoding? -- MJJR 19:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC) It's done. Vassil 22:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 230908 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, subject well valued.--B.navez 21:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Pierre l'Ermite Amiens 190908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortillonnages d'Amiens 230908 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too dark at first sight, but actually very good work! -- MJJR 20:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dynasty Fismes 270908 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sépulcre Arc-en-Barrois 111008 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail Arc-en-Barrois 121008 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Lycaon 13:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sépulcre Joinville 200908 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent -- Albertus teolog 10:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enfant Jésus de Prague Joinville 200908 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's OK. --Lestath 21:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail Vierge Arc-en-Barrois 281008 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail for a picture of this kind. --Eusebius 08:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Amiens Cathédrale Spectacle 190908 01.jpg[edit]

Bonjour.

En cherchant à illustrer l'article "son et lumière" de fr.wp, je suis tombée sur vos photos de la cathédrale d'Amiens. Et je me suis posé des questions : que voulez-vous dire par "Façade de la cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens pendant le son et lumière. Ce spectacle gratuit (...) reconstitue la polychromie des statues par projection lumineuse, réalisée par la société Skertzo (à contacter pour une utilisation des photos)." : l'éclairage est-il copyrighté ou non ? S'il l'est, alors la photo ne doit pas être sur Commons.

J'ai parlé de mon interrogation sur le Bistro : Commons:Bistro#Photo qui ne devrait pas être ici ?. Jastrow m'a conseillé de vous poser la question... Merci d'avance de vos réponses (peut-être directement sur la discussion du Bistro ?). --Edhral (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo Musée G[edit]

Bonjour, Je suis tombé par hazard sur une de tes photos du musée Guillemet. Sais tu si une photo prise dans ce musée est vraiment publiable? Est-ce autorisé par le musée? En te remerciant de l'info. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gorgoroth pictures[edit]

Hi, please do not remove description or categories from images, even if they are nominated for deletion. If they are kept eventually, it creates extra-work to restore these informations, and it can be misleading for people who review the images to comment on the DR. Thanks. –Tryphon 21:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Snow Leopard Clearance[edit]

Hi, I am interested in using your photo of a snow leopard turned away from the camera with his tail in the foreground in a book I am writing. While I realize you have released this photo into the public domain, my publisher is insisting I make sure you are the photographer and owner of the rights to the photo. Would you be willing to help me out by signing a permission form? If you could email me at matteier@gmail.com, I could give you the form I would need signed, and you could email it back to me. I would give you credit in the book, and I could also pay you a small sum if you are interested. Thank you.

réponse Florac[edit]

Bonjour, et tout d'abord jolies photos, le projet Lozère & Gévaudan est toujours preneur de photos de cette qualité pour ses articles ;). En ce qui concerne Urbain V, rien de bien compliqué quand même. Dès qu'il y a un pape dans une église lozérienne, sauf cas particulier, il s'agit de Guillaume de Grimoard. D'autant plus si proche de son lieu de naissance. Bonne continuation, Sanguinez (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Vassil!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Next time[edit]

Thanky for your edit in de:wikipedia, next time you can also add the image directly to "Bild" which means picture in German. Greetings --hroest 18:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND de Fourvière Intérieur 250709 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Image dates[edit]

Hi, I looked at several metal images you took and I want to ask you to please use the date of creation as the photo date - the line is not meant for the date of upload (which is clearly visible in the log anyway). Could you please also use the ISO-format YYYY-MM-DD, so the date is displayed right for all languages? Thank you! 18:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Cambrai 221109 Carpeaux La Jeune Fille 6.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done.Vassil (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolichotis patagonum (Patagonian Mara).

Dear Vassil, I just changed the ID of your image File:Liseron Amiens.jpg from Convolvulus arvensis to Calystegia sepium. There might be Calystegia silvatica in parts of France (see http://www.tela-botanica.org/eflore/BDNFF/4.02/nn/12348 ), which might look very similar. Convolvulus arvensis has got different leaves which are not as wide relative to their length and not as deeply heart-shaped at the base. Nevertheless I got some advice from de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung (see the Commons page with your image for the actual link!) before reassigning the image to Calystegia sepium. Best regards -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I just saw your two pictures and added the category "Cynocephali" to it, because I think this gargouille is a "dog-head" and not a werewolf.--Inugami-bargho (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gibbon Amiens 26873.jpg[edit]

We wanted to let you know that we've used another of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/6915717177/lit-journal-of-voyages-by-jacob-dunham-pic

Here is the other picture that we've used of yours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/843277257/lit-the-rustlers-of-pecos-county-by-zane-grey

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsblog@gmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Permission[edit]

Hello.

I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your picture that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo in my book. Below are the animal that will represents your photo. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements.

I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.

Photographer: Vassil. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coccinelle_sur_une_fleur.jpg Ladybug.

Thank you very much. Louise - zandtree@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Throne of Katarsis Speyer 19 02 2011 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Will pass IMO --Ximonic 10:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Setherial Igel Rock 12 09 2010 1 NB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Barely a good photogrpah. Like it that you decided to take it in black and white --A.Ceta 09:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mosquée_de_Tarbes_191007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Galmier Eglise 07 2011 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urgehal Metal Mean Festival 20 08 2011 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 17:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Place_Stanislas_Opéra_211207.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

QIC Decline[edit]

For some reason you have declined this image which I nominated in QIC with the reason "crop at the top". I didn't crop this picture and all of the Alpaca except for the end of a few hairs at the top which doesn't really disturb the image in my opinion. The quality of the image is also good. I've commented on the image's nomination 2 days ago and you don't seem to respond there--Someone35 (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I meant to view only the face of the alpaca, I have other pictures of alpacas which have all of their body visible, also how am I supposed to take a picture with both ears of the alpaca?--Someone35 (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will it be better if I crop the right part of the image?--Someone35 (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Cropped the image, please take a look at it again--Someone35 (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
k thanks--Someone35 (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keep of Kalessin Metal Mean 20 08 2011 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urgehal Metal Mean Festival 20 08 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège Eglise saint-Jacques 23 08 2009 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and propotion but the lighting is problematic, but it's good enough for QIC in my opinion --Someone35 15:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège Eglise saint-Jacques Vitrail 23 08 2009 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hylas Saint-Romain-en Gal 07 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée GR de Saint-Romain-en-Gal 27 07 2011 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais du Tau Statues originales 17062011 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but try not to have objects in the background of your pictures next time --Someone35 15:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwiefalten 28 04 2011 Angels 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vishnou Gujarat Bruxelles 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 08:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahavira Bruxelles 02 10 2011 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiva Nataraja Tanjore Bruxelles 02 10 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 06:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodhisattva Jin Shanxi Bruxelles 02 10 2011 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Pauluskerk Antwerpen 21 08 2010 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Pauluskerk Antwerpen 21 08 2010 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keep of Kalessin Metal Mean 20 08 2011 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments excellent --Ralf Roletschek 18:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Vassil, could you please date (approximately) the original art work shown in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles Divinite farouche Tibet 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine des Quatre-Parties-du-Monde 20 11 2010 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dark Fortress Metal Mean 20 08 2011 10 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles Cheval Tang 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpeaux Valenciennes 080810 36 Amour blessé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Comment Anomaly on the background see note. --Archaeodontosaurus 13:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Thanks, I fixed the anomaly. --Vassil 18:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC) k, promoted--Someone35 08:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artedia squamata new versions[edit]

Hi. There is a little problem. You have upload a new verision of File:Artedia squamata 1 edit.jpg, but also i made it File:Artedia squamata 1.jpg. What need to do? Sorry for my english. --T137(talk) 13:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, but now we have 2 identical phots. Is it fine? thanks anyway. --T137(talk) 16:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chene Fau Verzy 23 10 2011 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trou maçonnique[edit]

Salut !

Conformément à ta demande, le "trou" maçonnique a désormais perdu sa feuille...--Jebulon (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fau de la Demoiselle Verzy 23 10 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles Disque jade Xuanji 02 10 2011 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fau de Verzy 23 10 2011 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 14:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mur Païen 01 11 2011 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a little bit dark but QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Saint-Odile 1 11 2011 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice colors! --Ralf Roletschek 19:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles Zodiaque Boeuf Shanxi 02 10 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helfaut Interieur 28 10 2011 03 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Léna 01:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helfaut Interieur 28 10 2011 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Léna 01:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helfaut Generatrice 28 10 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments little "tilt" ccw, non ? Otherwise very good.--Jebulon 15:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Merci, j'espère avoir corrigé le problème. --Vassil 12:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC)oui.--Jebulon 10:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Loup de l'Arctique 14082.jpg[edit]

We wanted to let you know that we've used another one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/12898836074/lit-murphy-by-ernest-gambier-parry-pic-vassil

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsblog@gmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Name for a photo[edit]

Hello! I needed some photos for a book that I'm doing at the work, and I chose on of yours (this one). It could be possible to know your real name to put it in the attributions' page? (it's a kind of book where it looks far better a complete name&surname than an user name). Thank you anyway, -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Please credit to Vassil Asjac.

Thanks a lot! :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 13:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Salut, Je m'interroge sur la description de ce coeur. Je ne vois rien de catholique là-dedans, mais j'y reconnais bien, en revanche, le monogramme de la reine Marie-Antoinette, ce qui le daterait plutôt de la fin du XVIIIème siècle. As-tu d'autres lumières sur le sujet ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merci de ta réponse. Avoue qu'on pourrait s'y tromper. Je vais creuser la question. Merci en tous cas pour une belle photo d'un bel objet, avec un peu de mystère...--Jebulon (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Ex-voto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very nice --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Coussin 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée Boyadjian MRAH 20 11 2011 Coussin 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 07 Roemer XIX 20 12 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The blurring of the background is not perfect, but the main subject is very good and sharp--Jebulon 16:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 3 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and interesting, with very good EV. I'm not a fan of the white background in this case and the "cut-off" is a bit harsh IMO, but it is a QI, because the main subject is very good and sharp.--Jebulon 16:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Thanks. But I didn't remove the background, the faces are set on a white lighting glass. --Vassil 19:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 4 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Same comments as for the "Jean de Louvain" 's one.--Jebulon 16:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail Jean Hack 2 1542 MRAH 20 11 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As Jean de Louvain's comments.--Jebulon 16:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 01 Fiole Egypte 20 12 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI, even if I'm not sure with the DoF.--Jebulon 02:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinant Collegiale 270510 Vitrail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aleks G 23:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH 271211 6 Dieu et la Vierge XVI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilt ccw ? --Jebulon 17:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Exact, merci. Est-ce mieux maintenant ? Le fauteuil de la Vierge n'est pas d'équerre, c'est d'origine. --Vassil 17:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)C'est très beau et très bien photographié. QI--Jebulon 23:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Merci :) --Vassil 10:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH 271211 2 Seigneur et dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and interesting--Jebulon 16:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Aquamanile Aristote et Phyllis 261211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments hoi! fine picture! --Mbdortmund 00:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)...and nice object too. But I'm not sure with the background, the thing seems "floating"...--Jebulon 01:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)C'est vrai...je voulais changer du fond noir, que j'ai mis aussi. --Vassil 12:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 271211 03 Ducdalf FN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI (maybe maybe a little unsharp at the bottom, but otherwise very good).--ArildV 22:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 271211 02 Bocal XVI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 22:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MAP Expo Armure Clan Ikeda Dragon 30 12 2011 2.jpg[edit]

Bonne année! Ceci dit il est très bien ton dragon en QI, mais il penche un peu si tu le redresse se serait parfait...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Masque de Samouraï[edit]

Il est splendide ce masque, le pb c'est l'éclairage, mais tu n'y es pour rien. Par contre sous les parties sombres tu as toutes les informations. Avec photoshop, j'ai vérifié, tu peux les faire réapparaître (tons clairs/tons sombres)... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image guidelines - downsampling[edit]

Hello. There have been many inconsistencies regarding the evaluation of images in Commons, mainly on the issue of resolution and sharpness. I think we should agree upon a uniform policy, and try to reach a consensus. I started a new discussion on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Thank you. Gidip (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Armure Clan Ikeda Dragon 30 12 2011 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Somen Muneakira 02 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 13:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Nanban kabuto 05 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Empereur Ojin Poupée 03 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, and Nice eyebrows ;).--Jebulon 15:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Map Expo Zunari kabuto 03 01 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, and Nice ear ;) --Jebulon 16:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Sujibachi kabuto Menpo 06 01 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, and Nice mustache ;)--Jebulon 16:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hameçon 13012012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 04:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Epingle 30 12 2011 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hei tiki 15 01 2012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The light could be a little bit more diffuse, but still QI I think. Also interesting valuable Motif. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Expo Maori Hei tiki 15 01 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The light could be a little bit more diffuse, but still QI I think. Also interesting valuable Motif. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 23012012 Aiguiere 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --99of9 09:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 23012012 Flute 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 17:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vierge à Cordoue[edit]

Bonjour Vassil.

J'ai tenté de prendre en compte ta remarque sur le caractère jaunasse de "ma" statue de la vierge dans la Cathédrale de Cordoue. Je te remercie de ton coup d'oeil, car je crois en effet que tu as raison. J'ai tenté d'améliorer la chose. Ces chapelles sont bien sombres, et l'omniprésence des dorures baroques est encore amplifiée par l'éclairage, effectivement. Je sais que tu n'ignores pas à quel point ce genre d'images est difficile à faire ! Peux-tu à nouveau jeter un regard, s'il te plaît, et me dire ce que tu en penses ? Merci --Jebulon (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Chipotons, chipotons, il en reste toujours quelque chose !! Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Remi Reims Rose Façade 05 02 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Super. Digne des trois labels à mon avis. Tente une proposition en FP.--Jebulon 00:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PBAL Rodin L'Ange déchu 28012012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PBAL Deplechin Amphitrite 28012012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Vitraux[edit]

Bonjour,

Je crois que tu pourrais proposer quelques-uns de tes vitraux comme images remarquables. Nous avons peu d'images de vitraux de cette qualité. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons Sainte Waudru Vitrail 12 02 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons Sainte Waudru Vitrail 12 02 2012 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Yann 05:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for editing the picture Psyche_Leptosia_nina_by_kadavoor.JPG; I know little editing. Thanks, Jee - Jkadavoor (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 20022012 Coupe XVII 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and High EV--Jebulon 23:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MRAH Verre 20022012 Calice XVII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice ! --Jebulon 23:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remarque sur le détourage de photos[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci pour vos remarques. Je ne fais jamais de sélection automatique, je procède par sélections multiple en faisant des sélection par contour, par couleurs, par contraste, et en faisant les finitions à la main (ce qui prends beaucoup de temps, mais j'essaie d'être parfait). Ici, il semble effectivement qu'il y a ait un léger soucis pour le nez de l'ange (pourtant je l'ai recommencé 2 fois). Pour ce qui est de Hercule, je crois simplement que c'est un problème d'adoucissement de la sélection qui cause cet effet. La jambe est correctement découpée mais un peu crénelée. Et pour le buste d'André Lens, je pense que c'est le marbre lui-même qui est cassé, je vérifierai sur la photo originale.

Merci pour votre vigilance. --M0tty (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambrai SPAD VII 221109 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambrai SPAD VII 221109 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 14:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienne Saint Maurice 28 07 2011 07 Voussures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helrunar Metal Mean 20 08 2011 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's good, albeit somewhat high ISO, but I'm not convinced by the composition - bit tight at the top. Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Now I've uploaded the original shot without crop, is it better ?. --Vassil 19:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, as are the colours. Mattbuck 16:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Paris Fibules 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAP Paris Bracelet Siwa 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienne Saint Maurice 28 07 2011 02 Feuille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Pendentif turkmene 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 08:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Robe Pakistan 04032012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Coupe-noix d'arec Inde 04032012 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be sharper for parts, but good and interesting--Jebulon 23:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Pectoral 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and useful. --NorbertNagel 21:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Karahut 04032012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and useful. --NorbertNagel 21:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée du Quai Branly Papouasie Statuette 04032012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]