User talk:Fizped
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Fényvisszaverődés.jpg was uncategorized on 17 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Válasz
[edit]Leveled van a vitalapomon. --grin ✎ 21:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Rename
[edit]Hi. If you upload an image under the wrong at Commons, you can use the {{Rename}} template to request a file to be moved. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Van De Graaff gen 04.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Van De Graaff gen 04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 18:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK Pótoltam az engedélyt. / I added license. Fizped (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Fizped, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Fizped, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
File:Trafo 1.jpg etc
[edit]thanx for pictures. now the are used in german wiki. -- Summer ... hier! (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Frakno 01.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Frakno 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Frakno 02.jpg
- File:Frakno 03.jpg
- File:Frakno 04.jpg
- File:Frakno 05.jpg
- File:Frakno 06.jpg
- File:Frakno 07.jpg
- File:Frakno 08.jpg
- File:Frakno 09.jpg
- File:Frakno 10.jpg
- File:Frakno 11.jpg
- File:Frakno 12.jpg
- File:Frakno 13.jpg
- File:Frakno 14.jpg
- File:Frakno 15.jpg
- File:Frakno 16.jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre:
- Thank you for the warning. I added the licenses. -- Fizped (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Forgokondenzator rajz de.svg
[edit]Hallo Fizped, ich überarbeite gerade den Artikel "Variabler Kondensator" in der deutschen Wikipedia, siehe Benutzer:Elcap/Spielwiese, Dabei fällt mir dein Bild des Prinzips des Drehkondensators auf: , dass ich gern weiterverwenden möchte. Leider ist ein Begriff darin nicht richtig: Der Rotor sitzt auf einer Welle, nicht auf einer Achse. Könntest du bitte das Bild korrigieren, da ich mich mit dem Format "svg" nicht auskenne. Danke im Voraus, --Elcap (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elcap: Ich korrigierte es. Fizped (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Fizped, danke für dein Mail und deine Hillfe. Auch in der englischen Sprache gibt es den Unterscheid zwischen Welle und Achse: Welle (Mechanik) = Shaft (mechanical engineering) und Achse (Technik) = Axle. Grüße --Elcap (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elcap: Ich korrigierte english Version auch. Fizped (talk) 10:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Fizped, danke für dein Mail und deine Hillfe. Auch in der englischen Sprache gibt es den Unterscheid zwischen Welle und Achse: Welle (Mechanik) = Shaft (mechanical engineering) und Achse (Technik) = Axle. Grüße --Elcap (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Windings of Trafo?
[edit]Hello Fizped!
Thank you for your nice picture of the trafo! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trafo_4.jpg Can you please add a note how many windings the coils have?
Greetings, Panoga (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Panoga:
- This transformer is part of a kit. There are 6 coils in this kit. The windings of the coils are 14, 70, 140, 280, 560, 560. I can send pictures of the complete set in e-mail. If necessary, upload them to Wikimedia Commons. On photo are windings of coils 560 (left), 280. (right). Fizped (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Fizped:
- Thank you for your information. I added a note to the picture.--Panoga (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Apaczai dij.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Apaczai dij.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Apaczai dij.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kiss Nagy András szerzői jogi örökösének az írásos engedélyére volna szükség. Regasterios (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bár furcsának találom, hogy a saját tulajdonomban lévő műtárgyról nem hozhatok nyilvánosságra egy általam készített fotót, de a jog szerint igazad van. Azonnali törlést kértem és ugyanígy fogok eljárni a többi hasonló képemnél is. Előtte azonban mindenhonnan eltávolítom ezeket a képeket, és csak úgy kérem a törlést. Fizped (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
File:ELFT erem 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Rátz Tanár Úr Díj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ferromagneses penzermek 1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ferromagneses penzermek 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ferromagneses penzermek 1.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)