User talk:Ralf Roletschek/Archive/2015

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-12-helsinki-RalfR-N3S 0340-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Ralf Roletschek/common.js

Hi Ralf Roletschek, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Ralf Roletschek/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 11:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-02-27-Flug-Berlin-Düsseldorf-RalfR-DSCF2427b-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed we have back light here, but amazing deep dimension and a good cityscape view. --Taxiarchos228 21:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-13-silja-baltic-princess-RalfR-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 17:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-brno-RalfR-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-brno-RalfR-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 17:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, yet still rotated cw. Also the crop with the fence is unfortunate but can be healed easily, see note --Cccefalon 16:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Good quality, well done. --Cccefalon 18:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

wird wirklich Zeit

dass du dir dir File-Mover-Rechte holst. BTW: ein Mail wg wikiversity ist noch offen. Wg. Mentoring.--Hubertl (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Jaaaa. Ich arbeite. Melde mich. --Ralf Roleček 10:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Sonnenfinsternis

Danke für das Bild aus Berlin, auch wenn es etwas den Regeln widerspricht, bei Wikinews nachträglich etwas zu ändern. --House1630 (talk) 13:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Davon habe ich keine Ahnung. Gilt denn nicht "its a wiki"? --Ralf Roleček 13:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Souvenirs shop in London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Ok now. --Hubertl 20:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

File:2010-04-13-hoecker-by-RalfR-01-cropped.jpg

File:2010-04-13-hoecker-by-RalfR-01-cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- M\A 15:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Deine Mail

Moin Ralf, Deine Mail will nicht, ich versuche Dir eine Nachricht zu senden. Stichwort; FWS Förderantrag Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 19:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Köthke

Hallo Ralf, ich habe Fotos von meine Schätzchen hochgeladen. Kannst Du bitte mal wegen der Kategorisierung schauen, vor allem wusste ich nicht, wie ich diese Schaltung kategorisieren soll, zumal es sich um eine Egg-Schaltung handelt. Deshalb sollte man diese Fotos imo in einer Kategorie zusammenfassen. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Ist das nicht Campa? Du darfst mich nie nach Kategorien fragen, sowas kann ich nicht und ich halte sie auch für komplett überflüssig ;) Ich gucke mir das mal näher an. --Ralf Roleček 09:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Auf einer Ausstellung mit historischen Rädern vor einigen Jahren wurde mir gesagt, das sei Egg, und zwar von mehreren Leuten, die alle Experten für historische Rennräder sind. Aber ok, dann muss ich mich da selbst durchwurschteln :) --Nicola (talk) 09:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Kategorien und Ralf ist inkompatibel. Totoal! --Ralf Roleček 09:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:EP logo mute RGB.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:EP logo mute RGB.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-18-Schloß-Schönbrunn-Großer-Saal-DSCF3688-RalfR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-18-Wien-Maserati-Quattroporte-M156-DSCF3615-RalfR-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-02-Reiserad-beladen-RalfR-dscf4852-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5188-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5089-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and QI -- Spurzem 21:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5191-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5162-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might need a small perspective correction since the walls seem to be leaning. Also, on the right there are some black spots. Dust spots? The light is very nice. --Ximonic 21:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Thanks! --Ximonic 23:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5143-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dust spots here too. --Ximonic 21:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)  Support --Ximonic 23:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schön und QI. -- Spurzem 15:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC) There is a bunch of dust spots Poco a poco 18:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)  Done que embarazoso --Ralf Roletschek 18:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Better, thanks Poco a poco 21:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Informative and good quality -- Spurzem 15:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-09-Biosphärenreservat-Schorfheide-Chorin-RalfR-DSCF5493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-09-Biosphärenreservat-Schorfheide-Chorin-Totoalreservat-Plagefenn-DSCF5538-RalfR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-09-Biosphärenreservat-Schorfheide-Chorin-Totoalreservat-Plagefenn-DSCF5571-RalfR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:04, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5191-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-05-05-Schloß-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5191-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-09-Biosphärenreservat-Schorfheide-Chorin-Totalreservat-Plagefenn-DSCF5562-RalfR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-25-Goldener-Saal-Zeppelintribüne-Nürnberg-RalfR-DSCF4517 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-03-03-Fahrradreparatur-RalfR-DSCF2634-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 00:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thibaut120094 23:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-brno-RalfR-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-25-Goldener-Saal-Zeppelintribüne-Nürnberg-RalfR-DSCF4463 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good photograph, but the sky is laced with dust spots. Please do remove them first. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you. QI now..--Johann Jaritz 09:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-05-Schwerin-RalfR-DSCF5115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-01-24-перейти в Пальма-де-Майорка-RalfR-DSCN1124-066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)*  Support Ok now for me. --Hubertl 09:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Gilt

das für alle unsere Lieblingslizenzen (cc-by-sa, artlibre, GFDL)? Gilt das auch für Twitter und andere Dienste? -- Smial (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Wenn man Facebook ein Foto überläßt, gibt man Rechte daran an Facebook. Dies ist inkompatibel zu allen freien Lizenzen. Man selbst kann das machen, ein Nachnutzer jedoch nicht. Wie es bei Twitter & Co. aussieht, weiß ich nicht. --Ralf Roleček 21:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a bit underexposed, but good for QI IMO.--Jebulon 11:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-09-Biosphärenreservat-Schorfheide-Chorin-Totalreservat-Plagefenn-DSCF5532-RalfR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 07:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Aquädukt

Hallo Ralf, Dein File:14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-043.jpg gefällt mir sehr gut. Trotzdem die Frage: Hängt das Aquädukt wirklich so schief, wie es auf dem Bild aussieht? Der Baum im Hintergrund lässt es zwar vermuten, aber wenn, dann müsste es doch fallen. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Das Ding ist total schief und man hat keinen Anhaltspunkt beim Fotografieren. Schau mal auf die anderen Bilder der Kat, besonders mein 20 Jahre altes File:Aquaedukt-cerdanyola.jpg, der erste Bogen neigt sich nach links, der übernächste nach rechts. Ich kann nicht ausschließen, daß das Bild schief ist, ich weiß es einfach nicht. --Ralf Roleček 21:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-praha-strahov-RalfR-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --PetarM 21:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-05-24-wien-RalfR-052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-04-barcelona-RalfR-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-barcelona-RalfR-053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-barcelona-RalfR-064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Romantic and good quality -- Spurzem 22:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Du hast Post

siehe E-Mail. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-21-landtag-mainz-RalfR-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-19-Julia-Klöckner-RalfR-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:33, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-03-seifhennersdorf-RalfR-22 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-03-seifhennersdorf-RalfR-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-03-seifhennersdorf-RalfR-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-03-seifhennersdorf-RalfR-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-03-seifhennersdorf-RalfR-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-30-colmar-by-RalfR-103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Финитор 11:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and excellent subject. --Slaunger 20:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-05-23-Berlin-Sachsendamm-Tesla-RalfR-N3S 7354.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Foto von dir beim Postillion

Hey Ralf, haste gesehen? Der Postillion hat ein Foto von dir drin? http://www.der-postillon.com/2010/09/neuer-trend-organtatowierungen-immer.html Gruß --Pankoken (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Und das schöne daran: Der Postillon macht es seit Jahren richtig. -- Smial (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC) (ok, sie verlinken nicht direkt die GFDL, aber bei all dem sonstigen Bilderklau ohne jede Quellenangabe wollen wir mal nicht so pingelig sein)

Postillon nimmt gern meine Bilder. Und die Lizenzierung ist wirklich nahezu beispielhaft. --Ralf Roleček 17:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe mich damit abgefunden, auch wenn es nicht ganz 100%ig sauber ist. Wenn Name und Lizenz genannt sind und die Bildbeschreibungsseite verlinkt ist (über die man dann an die Lizenztexte kommt), ist das immerhin mehr, als die Wikipedia macht und gegenüber vielen fast allen anderen Nachnutzungen tatsächlich schon vorbildlich. Ich freue mich inzwischen schon dann, wenn Autor und Lizenz lesbar sind, aber sonst nichts verlinkt ist. Dann kann der Leser immerhin noch googlen. --Smial (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7406 7 8-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7417 8 9-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7429 30 31 32-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7434 5 6-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7474 5 6 7-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Rolf H. 03:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7447 8 9-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 23:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-12-Himmelsstürmer-Kassel-N3S 7924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-12-Himmelsstürmer-Kassel-N3S 7927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7426 7 8-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done verzerrt --Ralf Roletschek 11:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Good quality. Motz nicht ;-) --Hubertl 11:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7423 4 5-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective need a small adjustment but OK --Livioandronico2013 20:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7462-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7442-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-06-06-Schloßkirche-Schwerin-RalfR-N3S 7444-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-06-12-Himmelsstürmer-Kassel-N3S 7924.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-06-12-Himmelsstürmer-Kassel-N3S 7924.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Neuzer-bike-hu-logo.png

File:Neuzer-bike-hu-logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BelCorvus (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo Ralf Roletschek,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Sei net so kindisch!

wennst bis jetzt nicht die Filemover-Berechtigung hast, dann hol sie dir. In WP kannst ja auch Dateien verschieben. Das sind so typische Aktionen, die echt niemandem etwas bringen, aber mit ein paar Handgriffen aus dem Weg geschaffen sind. Du solltest dir mal die Lightroom-Organisation etwas besser anschaun, dann wirst merken, dass man damit die Bilder total easy benennen kann. Ich glaub dir einfach nicht, dass es dir tatsächlich um Dateinamen geht. Dafür kenn ich dich doch zu gut. Der X-Ray ist ein Netter, glaubs mir. --Hubertl (talk) 20:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Mir gehts um die typisch deutsche Vorschreibere und Gleichschalterei. Meine Dateinamen gehen niemanden was an. Wenn ich sie einfach nur durchnummeriere, ist das Bild genauso und wird über andere Mechanismen auch gefunden. nNur ich kann meine umbenannten Dateien nicht mehr finden, z. B. über 200 Bilder von London, die jetzt alle englisch benamst sind. Ich habe keine einzige Datei mehr gefunden, also habe ich alle nochmal hochgeladen. Das ist absolut unfreundlich zum Uploader. Die Bilder von der Veranstaltung hier bekommen kyrillische Dateinamen, die von der Freizeit lade ich in mein eigenes Wiki, unter ND - daß der Dateiname bleibt. Das ist hier zwar von der Lizenz abgesegnet aber so, als wenn man einem Fremden wild im Bild herumeditiert und es dann drüberspeichert. Sollte man auch nur gaaaanz behutsam in Ausnahmefällen machen. Stinksauer. --Ralf Roleček 20:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Ralf_Roletschek&ilshowall=1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-N3S 9228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-WMA 0616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-WMA 0721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-WMA 0203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009-04-19-noerdlingen-eisenbahnmuseum-rr-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ralf, your verticals make me happy :) ... Please remove one dust spot (see note) --Cccefalon 05:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, Ralf Roletschek! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-WMA 0974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Muy bien, señor. Buena cualidad. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please rename the file. It's not a meaningful file name.--XRay 10:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Pickerl-finnland.jpg

Hi! This image also needs additional license tag under which you publish your work. 90.191.109.9 17:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 04:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Suchoj-Superjet-100-RalfR-WMA 0558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail --Daniel Case 04:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 23:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition for me and good quality -- Spurzem 16:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Mexico-D-F-del-Norte-a-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Mexico-D-F-del-Norte-a-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 15:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacán-RalfR-DSCF6626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 07:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacán-RalfR-DSCF6630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Flug-MEX-CDG-RalfR-N3S 9821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image for dust spots. Im put a note to your image. May be it's not the only one.--XRay 08:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 08:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. Thank you. --XRay 09:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-22-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 9890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 08:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-17-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-WMA 1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 14:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 14:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-30-Rohloff-Speedhub-FocusStacking-RalfR-N3S 0102 3 4 5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Mexico-D-F-del-Norte-a-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image for CAs. See my note.--XRay 08:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thanks. --XRay 16:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:18, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:04, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.wennst jetzt noch einen netten Dateinamen vergibst, dann hab ich dich gaaaanz lieb! --Hubertl 10:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.wennst jetzt noch einen netten Dateinamen vergibst, dann hab ich dich gaaaanz lieb! --Hubertl 10:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 10:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Can you remove the CA, especially visible on the statue on the left? --Tsungam 10:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Fine now. --Tsungam 12:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, DoF is just ok --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 22:29, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 22:29, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Papperlapap 10:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Papperlapap 09:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-17-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-WMA 1270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-17-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-WMA 1278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 19:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basics of photography – how you learn to shoot better photos.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basics of photography – how you learn to shoot better photos.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 14:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good to see the police so careful ... and a taxy passing unmarked ... excellent. It seems the Italian police. --Livioandronico2013 09:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC) * Comment this is not the common Police, but the Policia Auxiliar, assisting forces which only serve to guard special objects. Denis Barthel 12:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:12-10-13-kongreszhalle-nuernberg-by-RalfR-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:12-10-13-kongreszhalle-nuernberg-by-RalfR-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP

Herzlichen Dank Ralf für Deine Begeisterung, könntest du bitte bei diesem Kandidaten vorbeischauen? LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Klar doch, schon erledigt. FPC ist oft unberechnebar, da habe ich schon seltsame Überraschungen erlebt, in beide Richtungen. Ich habe zwei Fremdnominierungen bisher, sind beide anstandslos "durchgegangen" - und ich hätte die nie nominiert. Umgekehrt wurden Bilder abgeschmettert, die ich für gut halte. --Ralf Roleček 17:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Einmischung: Es ist schlimm, was bei FPC im Moment abgeht, fast noch absurder als bei Wikipedia KEB, wo sich inzwischen kaum noch jemand beteiligt. Offensichtlich wollen einige Leute, die zugegebenermaßen selbst hervorragend fotografieren, ihre unübertrefflichen Kenntnisse präsentieren, indem sie die Arbeit anderer herabwürdigen. Beste Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressiv and good quality -- Spurzem 11:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --XanonymusX 12:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-11-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 8864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-11-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 8840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-11-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 8811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support illustrative and good.--Jebulon 22:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Where was it taken ?--Jebulon 22:34, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Geocoordinates are added. --Ralf Roletschek 22:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good lighting on the body, nice composition.--Jebulon 22:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-16-Straszenszenen-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments COuld probably have cropped in a bit more but car is sharp --Daniel Case 15:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Polizei-in-Mexico-DSCF6531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Demonstration-in-Mexico-WMA 1336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But what track is it? -- Spurzem 09:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Demonstration-in-Mexico-WMA 1329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Demonstration-in-Mexico-WMA 1338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 11:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Demonstration-in-Mexico-WMA 1325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done right. --Ralf Roletschek 21:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Comment I'm afraid it's not enough, the structures on the left are still leaning --Moroder 09:54, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Der Lampenmast ist schief. --Ralf Roletschek 06:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC) Good quality, QI for me. --Hubertl 18:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacan-by-RalfR-N3S 9414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacan-by-RalfR-N3S 9407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:12, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Torre-Latino-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 1360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Denis Barthel 17:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-19-Fahrradcorso-RalfR-DSCF6581 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment das ist ein bißchen schief ... kannste das drehen? Denis Barthel 17:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)  Done stimmt, das war schief. --Ralf Roletschek 18:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Good quality now. Denis Barthel 19:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Polizei-in-Mexico-DSCF6535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Polizei-in-Mexico-DSCF6537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 14:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-19-Fahrradcorso-RalfR-DSCF6576 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-19-Fahrradcorso-RalfR-DSCF6586 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Souvenierladen-in-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 14:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Straßenszene-Mexico-RalfR-DSCF6594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Straßenszene-Mexico-RalfR-DSCF6591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-17-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-WMA 1273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please, remove the dust spots (I marked 3) --Poco a poco 09:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Polizei-in-Mexico-DSCF6534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting scene --Isiwal 19:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacán-RalfR-DSCF6629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacán-RalfR-DSCF6609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Pudelek 09:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Souvenierladen-in-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 15:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Straßenszene-Mexico-DSCF6527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Remember Don Juan Matus. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Demonstration-in-Mexico-WMA 1326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Hubertl 14:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Ecobico-en-Mexico-DSCF6546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exemplary ecobici. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 06:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-21-Mexico-Stadtzentrum-RalfR-N3S 9655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 12:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-19-Fahrradcorso-RalfR-DSCF6566-72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for me. --C messier 21:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Seelow

Hallo Ralf, das war's auch schon meiner Seite :-). Wenn du in der Gegend um Seelow unterwegs bist, kannst du ja mal die fiesen Gipshäuser in Wulkow fotografieren. Die hatte ich bei meinem Aufenthalt im Juli nicht als Denkmäler wahrgenommen... --Magnus (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Meine Güte, das ist ja am Arsch der Welt, nie gehört. Ich war vor einem halben Jahr in Seelow, das Mahnmal knipsen. Habs nur noch nicht hochgeladen. --Ralf Roleček 10:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; sehr gute und schöne Detailaufnahmen -- Spurzem 10:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Probably tilted, but above all, strong chromatic aberrations to be corrected, please (nice place, however)--Jebulon 09:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC) right, new version uploaded. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC) Ok for me. --Hubertl 13:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Einstein2 12:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacan-by-RalfR-N3S 9468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK IMHO. --C messier 21:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1623 4 5 6 7 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Durcheinander

Bitte entschuldige das Durcheinander/Hin und Her auf deiner Beo, aber ich habs so langsam... LG Anika (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Das ist überhaupt kein Problem, mach dir keine Gedanken. --Ralf Roleček 10:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank (Tack)!

Ihre erhebende Worte haben mich neuen Mut gegeben! Ich werde noch einmal versuchen. Mein Deutsch ist nicht existent, so nachsichtig zu sein! :) C T Johansson (talk) 18:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Yucatan-Ölfelder-RalfR-WMA 0484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 17:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Yucatan-Ölfelder-RalfR-WMA 0487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult to make, but really interesting and useful. QI for me. --Hubertl 18:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Yucatan-Ölfelder-RalfR-WMA 0480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Yucatan-Ölfelder-RalfR-WMA 0481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacan-by-RalfR-N3S 9429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1459-65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Luftbild-RalfR-WMA 0528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Landschaft-zwischen-Mexico-und-Golfküste-RalfR-WMA 0450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Luftbild-RalfR-WMA 0513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Flugplatz-MEX-RalfR-WMA 0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A lot of dust in the background ... --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Teotihuacán-RalfR-DSCF6608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment At least three visible dustspots, maybe more. Please check (before nominating next time, if possible...--Jebulon 21:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Support Daddy says that crop at right is unfortunate, but the pic is good enough for QI.--Jebulon 21:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-17-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-WMA 1272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Suchoj-Superjet-100-RalfR-WMA 0555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1471-75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vengolis 03:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche Cristo Negro Señor de San Román-RalfR-WMA 0776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche Cristo Negro Señor de San Román-RalfR-WMA 0778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 05:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Шухрат Саъдиев 05:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 05:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Need for fixing image

Hi, can you please fix transparency of this image? --Martinligabue (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

What is there to fix? --Ralf Roleček 17:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0807-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. There is at least one dust spot (see my note).--XRay 07:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)oops, sorry.  Done --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 07:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please provide the name of the church. --C messier 11:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:15-07-14-Suchoj-Superjet-100-RalfR-WMA 0558.jpg

Hi, what airport did you take File:15-07-14-Suchoj-Superjet-100-RalfR-WMA 0558.jpg at? Feel free to reply here. Thanks N712T (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

It's the Airport Campeche. --Ralf Roleček 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-04-pramen-nysa-RalfR-DSC 1037-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-brno-RalfR-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-30-brno-RalfR-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Shared Copyright

Hallo Ralf, bei einer Aktion wie eben der in Hamburg - gratuliere zu dieser Organisation! - haben die Bilder ein shared Copyright zu haben.

Siehe hier. Nicht der, welcher auf den Auslöser drückt, ist alleine der Copyrightinhaber. Das Bild selbst, welches durch die Kamera erzeugt hat, ist der geringste Teil einer solchen Aktion. Jeder, welcher creativ am Ablauf dabei war (ob es der Aufbau des Settings war, der Drink selbst, die gemeinsame Überlegung, wie das Glas am besten hingestellt wird etc.) ist Teil des Gestaltungsprozesses. Ich selbst halt das Drücken auf den Auslöser für den geringsten Teil des Gestaltungsprozesses. Da spielt es keine Rolle, ob der Fotograf derjenige ist, der die Blende und die Zeitvorgabe macht. Das ist Handwerk, aber nicht der genuine, alleinige schöpferische Prozess. Sollte auch als Anreiz dienen für zukünftige Projekte und Leute, die an solchen Aktionen teilnehmen, wenn man eben über diese Sache vielleicht die ersten QIs oder FPs bekommt. --Hubertl 06:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Stimmt, daran habe ich nicht gedacht. --Ralf Roleček 06:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Aber wenn ich länger drüber nachdenke, nein. Die "Mixer" haben keine Kunst sondern Handwerk gemacht. Bilder, die ich ästhetisch ansprechend fand, wollten sie wieder löschen, weil da aus Versehen eine falsche Frucht drin lag. Durch das Herumtragen war Sahne am Glasrand, ich habe etwas nachgießen lassen, das sollte aber auch gelöscht werden, weil das Verhältnis nicht mehr stimmt. Mir gefiel die kräftig grüne Limettenschale innen ma Glas, sie wollten das andersrum, weil man dann sieht, daß der Kern der Limette geschnitten wurde. Da wurde von A bis Z streng nach Rezeptbuch gearbeitet, das läßt kaum Raum für Gestaltung. Im Gegenteil, sie haben alles abgelehnt, was von der Linie abweicht und vielleicht etwas besser aussieht. --Ralf Roleček 07:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Wir haben das gerade besprochen. Die Barkeeper meinen, daß das, was sie gemacht haben, Handwerk war. Ich habe es nicht suggeriert, das kam von ihnen. Sie wehren sich auch dagegen, daß Cocktails geschützt sein können oder auch nur das Aussehen eines Cocktails. --Ralf Roleček 08:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Dieses "shared copyright" ist der größte Lizenzblödsinn, der mir auf commons jemals unterkam. Ist das überhaupt mit CC 4 vereinbar? Nachnutzerverwirrung. -- Smial (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Was macht dich zum Kenner des Urheberrechts, Smial? Dein Studium der Rechte? CC klärt nur die Frage der Nutzung, nicht das Urheberrecht selbst, weil es das gar nicht berühren bzw. regeln kann. Urheberrecht entsteht eo ipso aus dem schöpferischen Akt heraus, erst danach kommt die Klärung der Lizenz, sprich Nutzung. Aber vielleicht ist das ja neu für dich. Bei gemeinsamer Artikelarbeit ist es selbstverständlich, da unterscheiden wir nur zwischen Haupt- und Nebenautor, aber CC-BY fordert die Angabe aller Beteiligten (weil der jeweilige Anteil schwer herausrechenbar ist, um es handhabbar zu machen). Und so nebenbei sehe ich in der Gestaltung der Cocktails mehr schöpferische Arbeit als im fotografischen Erfassen. Will man es ganz genau, so ist sogar der Erfinder eines ganz bestimmten Cocktails noch im Urheberbereich enthalten, soferne in der Nachgestaltung die sogenannte sklavische Nachahmung vermutet werden kann - und diese Kombination einen Namen hat und dieser Name auch - wie in eurem Fall - verwendet wird. Dass dem nicht so ist, liegt offensichtlich im angelsächsischen Recht begründet, wo Fair Use angewendet werden kann. Wo liegt im Abdrücken des Auslösers bei einem vorgefertigten einfachen Setting wie in diesem Fall der höhere schöpferische Wert? Falls es interessiert, wie wir das in Graz gemacht haben - wenn du schon die Frage der Nachnutzerverwirrung ansprichst, dann kann man es ja dort nachlesen. Das ist die Lösung des Dilemmas, indem einfach - und auch das erfolgt automatisch wie die Frage der Urheberschaft auch - im Zuge einer Gesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts das Urheberrecht eben geteilt wird. Lies einfach im UrG nach. Eine GbR ist nicht einmal anmeldepflichtig, sie wird aber erst schlagend, wenn es eine gemeinsame Verwertung gibt. Diese GbR entsteht ebenso aus sich heraus, wenn zwei oder mehrere Personen etwas gemeinsam machen und es gemeinsam als ihr Werk verstehen. Ein im Übrigen völlig normaler Vorgang, man findet das in ähnlicher Form auch im Patentrecht. Nicht schwierig zu verstehen, etwas unüblich für uns weil offensichtlich neu, aber effizient und brauchbar. Einmal über den eigenen Tellerrand schauen eröffnet neue Perspektiven! Nützlich ist es auch, das Persönliche in solchen Fragen außen vor zu lassen, Smial, mit welchem du - speziell mit mir - ganz offenbar ein Problem hast seit der Nominierung des Bildes von Raymond im Winter. --Hubertl 23:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Welches Problem mit dir? Und welches Bild von @Raymond: im Winter? Dugutegüte, ich erinnere mich überhaupt nicht. Meine einfache Frage, ob das mit CC4 funktioniert, hast du nun mit vielen unfreundlichen Anmerkungen irgendwie beantwortet, das scheint also zu gehen. Offensichtlich hast du mehr Rechte studiert als ich, gute Sache das. Aber zur Verdeutlichung mal eine Frage aus der Sicht eines Nachnutzers: Wen muß ich fragen, wenn ich eins der Bilder abweichend von der gegebenen Lizenz nutzen will? Einen aus der erst noch zu suchenden Liste der Beteiligten? Alle Beteiligten? Dich als Initiator? Was den "Blödsinn" angeht: Wenn Du mal über den Tellerrand schaust, dann kannst du außerhalb von Commons und Wikipedia an unglaublich vielen Stellen Unwissen und Unklarheiten finden bei Leuten, die unsere Inhalte nutzen wollen oder bereits mehr oder minder lizenzkonform nutzen. Wenn du mal über den Tellerrand schaust, wirst du sehr, sehr häufig lesen und hören, daß potentielle Nachnutzer sich von dem Gedanken, unsere Inhalte zu nutzen, verabschieden, weil ihnen "das alles viel zu kompliziert ist mit den Lizenzen und so". Und genau deshalb halte ich solche einen Gemsinschaftsaccount für ausgemachten Blödsinn, denn er ist zum einen völlig unnötig und zum anderen trägt er massiv zur weiteren Nachnutzerverwirrung bei. Ein Foto - ein Ansprechpartner, so sollte das nach Möglichkeit sein. --Smial (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Zum Thema Schutz des Cocktails: Das kann ich nachvollziehen, dass es Unsinn ist, eine neue Kombination ähnlicher Getränke als nicht schützenswert zu deklarieren. Problematisch wird es aber dann, wenn der "Erfinder" einer bestimmten Kombination einen Namen gegeben hat und dieser Name dann - in eben unmittelbarer Nachahmung - auch dafür verwendet wird. Dann sind wir nämlich wieder beim Erfinder. Aber wie gesagt, das ist nicht der Kern der Sache. Der liegt in unserem Fall bei der - aus meiner Sicht durchaus schöpferischen Gestaltung des Produkts selbst - es ist sehr höflich von ihnen aber mit Sicherheit falsch, der Photografie einen höheren schöpferischen Stellenwert einzuräumen, der aus meiner Sicht nicht wirklich vorhanden ist. Ein gutes von einem schlechten Bild zu trennen ist zuwenig. Aber das ist eure Fotoaktion, nicht meine. Wenn ich so etwas mache, sind alle, die bei diesem schöpferischen Akt beteiligt sind, auch Urheber. Und so nebenbei: es fällt niemanden eine Perle aus der Krone, wenn man auch anderen etwas zugesteht und den Wert seiner Leistung auch anerkennt. Speziell dann, wenn im Zuge so einer Aktion doch deutlich mehr Aufwand und Genauigkeit aufgewendet wird, um so ein Produkt dann fotografierbar zu machen. Der wahre Mit-Urheber ist wahrscheinlich sogar anhand der gut sichtbaren Fingerabdrücke bei einem der bisher nominierten Bilder zu eruieren. . Mich würde aber interessieren, was Kollege Code dazu meint. --Hubertl 00:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Tatsächlich kann es bei Lichtbildern - genauso wie bei Lichtbildwerken - zumindest nach deutschem Recht ein sozusagen gemeinsames Urheberrecht geben (§ 8 UrhG für Lichtbildwerke, für Lichtbilder Verweis aus § 72 Abs. 1 UrhG). Voraussetzung ist, dass mehrere das Werk gemeinsam geschaffen haben und sich ihre Anteile nicht getrennt verwerten lassen. Problematisch ist allerdings, dass jeder einzelne Beitrag seinerseits urheberrechtlich schutzfähig sein muss. Wer lediglich Hilfsaufgaben wahrnimmt, ohne dabei einen eigenen Gestaltungsspielraum zu haben, wird nicht Miturheber. Inwieweit die Herstellung der Cocktails urheberrechtlich schutzfähig sein kann, ist natürlich eine interessante Frage. Ich denke, das wird man eher selten annehmen können. Hier kann man allenfalls von Werken der angewandten Kunst ausgehen. Selbst nach der Geburtstagszug-Entscheidung des BGH ist aber nicht jedes handwerklich einwandfreie Schaffen Kunst im Sinne des Urheberrechts. Da müsste das Cocktail schon besondere Qualitäten aufweisen. Wenn jemand aber selbstständig die Ausleuchtung des Bildes plant, die Farbe des Hintergrunds passend zum Cocktail aussucht und dergleichen mehr, dann kann dieser Beitrag schon eigenständig urheberrechtlichen Schutz genießen, so dass derjenige Miturheber wird. Ich würde allerdings annehmen, dass eine Miturheberschaft im rechtlichen Sinn bei Fotografien nur selten in Betracht kommt. In der Praxis ist mir das noch nie untergekommen. Natürlich schadet es aus Gründen der Rechtssicherheit nicht, wenn auch der Mixer des Cocktails sein Einverständnis gibt, das Bild unter CC zu lizenzieren. Ob es allerdings wirklich nötig ist, da habe ich meine Zweifel. Eine Gesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts entsteht dabei übrigens nicht, sondern eine Rechtsgemeinschaft sui generis, die sich nach den Regeln der Gesamthandsgemeinschaft richtet. Natürlich kann man darüber hinaus auch - ausdrücklich oder stillschweigend - eine GbR gründen, die die Verwertung der Nutzungsrechte übernimmt, das wird man im Fall des Kameraprojekts Graz vielleicht annehmen können. Der gesetzliche Regelfall ist das aber nicht. --Code (talk) 10:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Die Barkeeper haben ausdrücklich eine Miturheberschaft abgelehnt. Einer von ihnen ist nicht unbekannt, er hat ein Standardwerk geschrieben, was in etwa das Lexikon der modernen Cocktails ist. Ich habe den Eindruck, daß das in der Szene nicht erwünscht ist, da man auch Cocktails seiner "Konkurrenten" benutzen möchte. Anders sieht es aus, wenn ein Foto gestaltet wird. Einer streut Zucker auf den Spiegel, verteilt Kunstblut darauf, platziert einzelne Zuckerkörnchen mit der Pinzette, arrangiert Früchte und Flaschen usw. Ein anderer kümmert sich um Gegen- Flut- und Hauptlicht, der Dritte fotografiert. Das werden dann Stilleben, die von sich aus ein Kunstwerk darstellen, selbst wenn kein Cocktail dabeisteht. Derartige Bilder werden sie dann mit einem Sammelaccount oder der Nennung der Mitarbeiter hochladen. Meine Aufgabe war es ausdrücklich, "sehr nüchterne Sachaufnahmen" zu machen, die Drinks sollten vollkommen nach dem Lehrbuch ohne jede eigene Kreation sein - quasi der Standard. Hier kommt ein bekannter Vergleich zum Tragen: Wenn 10 Barkeeper so mixen sollen, sieht er dann 10 mal gleich aus oder jedes Mal anders? Ziel war Ersteres. In einem hat Hubertl natürlich Recht. Daran hätte ich früher denken müssen. Ein Vorschlag: im Baustein zum Projekt wird vermerkt, daß es ein Gemeinschaftswerk ist. --Ralf Roleček 17:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

In Graz war es so - und wird auch in Köln beim Workshop so sein - dass wir die Kamera nur als Vermittler eingesetzt haben, das Vorabergebnis wurde über Tablet bzw. Großbildschirm als Live View gemeinsam diskutiert. Der Einsatz der Softboxen, die Menge des zugeschaltenen Lichts, die Spiegelungseffekte, all das wurde gemeinsam bei jedem Objekt diskutiert und dann beschlossen. Der technische Abschluss, nämlich das Focusbracketing, war dann in Folge nur ein Knopfdruck am Tablet. Ebenso wurden Ergebnisse zeitnah am Großbildschirm gemeinsam diskutiert und im Zweifel dann wiederholt. Dasselbe galt auch bei der Drehbühne mit den Videoaufnahmen. Auch wenn die einzelnen Teilnehmer unterschiedliche Aufgaben übernommen haben - und diese dann in Folge ständig wechselten -, so waren doch alle bei der kreativen Umsetzung beteiligt. Für mich ist es schlichtweg ein Teil des Gesamtprozesses, dass jeder erkennt, wo er bei solchen Veranstaltungen auch Verantwortung übernehmen kann und soll. Und als Motivation auch das Ergebnis seiner Beteiligung zuordnet und damit sein eigenes Zutun aktiv wahrnimmt. Wir wollen doch, dass unser Wissensvorsprung schrumpft, oder? Wenn wir, die wir ja so supertoll sind in ein paar wenigen Sachen, diesen Abstand behalten wollen, dann müssen wir genausoviel dazulernen, wie wir anderen dann in Folge weitergeben.--Hubertl 05:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Hinweis: Da nicht nur für Ralf und mich, sondern auch für die weiteren Fotografen und Projektbeteiligte sowie ggf. für zukünftige Aktionen von Interesse, habe ich diese Disk sowie die auf meiner BS auf die Projektdisk zu Wiki Loves Cocktails (de:Portal_Diskussion:Essen und Trinken/Wiki Loves Cocktails#Shared Copyright) übertragen. Wäre schön, wenn ihr sie dort fortführen würdet. --Mangomix 🍸 16:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Weltkulturerbe Schwerin

Moin, danke für deine schönen Bilder aus Schwerin! Bevor ich etwas falsch mache: Gibt es einen Grund, dass du die nur in die Kategorie Weltkulturerbe Schwerin eingeordnet hast, nicht aber in die Objektkategorien der einzelen Bauwerke etc.? Gruss --Concord (talk) 22:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Nee, gibt keinen Grund und Danke für die Kopien. Ich möchte die Objekte des Weltkulturerbes separat erreichbar haben, nichts weiter. Das Kategoriensystem ist mir sowieso ein Rätsel ;) Ich hab auch die WLM-Cat MV vergessen, das hat Brücke ergänzt. --Ralf Roleček 22:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --ArildV 08:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Niabot-zeigt-inkscape-3.jpg

File:Niabot-zeigt-inkscape-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 deerstop. 16:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-10-05-praha-metro-RalfR-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice ! --Jebulon 20:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-12-23-bahnhof-salzburg-by-RalfR-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK to me Dllu 23:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-05-04-Střední-Smržovka v Jizerské hory-RalfR-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would brighten it a bit. At least the shadow parts. Otherwise OK for me. --Hockei 19:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-11-04-weiszensee-ard-RalfR-N3S 3800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please remove dust spot before promotion --Cccefalon 06:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)  Done right, this and the others are corrected --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)@Ralf Roletschek: There is another dustspot from your lens at the lower border of all the series !!!!--Jebulon 20:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please remove dust spot before promotion --Cccefalon 06:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please remove dust spot before promotion --Cccefalon 06:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good picture --Elrond 22:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please remove dust spots before promotion --Cccefalon 06:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 20:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please remove dust spot before promotion --Cccefalon 06:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Luftbild-RalfR-WMA 0506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf

könntest du mich vielleicht bei

file:Entwicklungserwartungen von russisch-deutschen und deutschen Müttern von vierjährigen Kindern.pdf

unterstützen, die Abschaltung der Hochladefunktion bei Wikiversity war ja nicht so gedacht, dass man jetzt hier, bei Sachen, die dort klar in der Projektreichweite sind, hier ewige Diskussionen führt. Schöne Grüße, und deine Fotos sind wirklich gut--Bocardodarapti (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Das ist eine Krux hier auf Commons. In de.WP gibts keine Relevanzkriterien aber hier wird immer wieder mit Scope argumentiert. Bisher hat es ganz gut geklappt, wenn ich {{Wikiversity learning material}} eingebaut habe, selbst bei so schlechten Bildern wie diesem. Schließlich erläutere ich auf WV, wie man aus dem schlechten ein besseres Foto machen kann. Ich war ja immer gegen die Abschaltung... ;) --Ralf Roleček 16:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for FP nomination of my picture.
Sincerely,
Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 22:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-18-Straßenszene-Mexico-DSCF6510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Souvenierladen-in-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Mexico-D-F-del-Norte-a-Teotihuacan-RalfR-N3S 9084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please correct the severe chromatic aberrations. Dllu 08:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me. I'm not sure if it's tilted slightly clockwise but it's not a big deal. Dllu 08:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Die Mole von Vorupør (Dänemark).jpg in der Diskussion QI-Kandidaten

Hallo Ralf,

danke für Deine lobenden Worte zu dem oben genannten Bild. Nun bin ich so gar kein Profi im Bearbeiten von Bildern und habe momentan sehr wenig Zeit dazu, zudem besitzte ich nur Photoshop Element 8 und kann selbst damit kaum umgehen ;-) Am Wochenende kann ich mich ev. dransetzen und etwas dran arbeiten. Was ich machen wollte ist: Den Horizont in die Waage bringen, links die Fahne rausschneiden und die Staubflecken entfernen. Wobei ich bei letzterem schon an die Grenze dessen komme, was ich an Kenntnissen habe.

Daher meine Bitte, kannst Du mir Ratschläge geben, wie ich die Entfernung dieses Flecks bewerkstelligen kann (mit oben genanntem Programm wenn möglich) Und was bitte meint Smial mit 'CA'? Bin mit diesen Abkürzungen leider nicht besonders vertraut (ein Glosar irgendwo auf der Seite wäre m.E. nicht nur schlecht um Neulingen diese Abkürzungen zu erklären) --Elrond (talk) 10:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, noch eine Anmerkung. Das Bild ist nur eine Ausschnittvergrößerung, ansonsten in keiner Weise bearbeitet, weder gefiltert, geschärft oder sonstewas. Die geringen Kontraste stammen wohl daher, daß die Luft sehr gischtig war, Sturm am Meer eben. Das irgendwie zu bearbeiten würde das Bild aber m.E. nicht besser machen. Sollte das denn ein Ausschlusskriterium sein, dann ist es eben so. --Elrond (talk) 11:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Wenn es dir Recht ist, würde ich dein Foto als ein Beispiel für komplexe Bildbearbeitung in Wikiversity nehmen, darin würde ich auch jeden der Schritte beschreiben? Idealerweise wäre die RAW (Rohdatendate) aus der Kamera. Die kannst du mir an ralf@roletschek.de schicken. --Ralf Roleček 12:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Ein Beispiel: https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Kurs:Photoshop_Einzell%C3%B6sungen/Fahrzeuge_fotografieren

Danke für das Angebot, aber leider hab ich kein RAW von diesem Bild, nur das JPEG. Wenn das reicht, schicke ich es Dir gerne, oder Du nimmst, wenn es reicht, das Bild in Commons. --Elrond (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Mir wäre das am liebsten, an dem absolut nichts gearbeitet wurde. --Ralf Roleček 14:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, schicke ich Dir heute abend, gleich muss ich noch ein paar Studenten ärgern ;-) --Elrond (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-11-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 8803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Landschaft-zwischen-Mexico-und-Golfküste-RalfR-WMA 0456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Edzna-Campeche-Mexico-RalfR-WMA 0683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 13:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Akt-landschaft-2007-02.jpg

File:Akt-landschaft-2007-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality en nice.--Famberhorst 18:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-08-09-peak-by-RalfR-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-RalfR-WMA 0261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-07-straszburg-RalfR-56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wenn du noch die Linien links geradeziehst, dann erst recht. --Hubertl 21:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 21:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-03-17-aktstudien-nuernberg-by-RalfR-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-31-metro-praha-by-RalfR-074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality despite the outblown neon lamps. --Hubertl 20:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks to you...

Thanks to you the photo File:Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië). Bomen langs bergpad in dichte mist 04.jpg receive one star.
Again thanks a lot.
Sincerely,
--Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Do you come to Erasmusprijs_2015? I'm there. --Ralf Roleček 21:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-07-straszburg-RalfR-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:14-02-06-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-003.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-06-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-06-hiltrud-breyer-RalfR-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-12-Helsinki-Fahrrad-Tunturi-RalfR-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now! --Hubertl 08:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 8957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Aeropuerto-Internacional-Ing-Alberto-Acuña-Ongay-RalfR-WMA 0902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacán-RalfR-N3S 9205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Bus in Mexico DF-RalfR-N3S 9608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-13-Teotihuacan-La-Ciudadela-RalfR-WMA 0151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but isn't it armoured truck as opposed to armed truck? Although the people inside may be armed. Dllu 11:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nobel-medizin-forssmann.jpg

Hatte es aus Category:Werner Forßmann rausgenommen, da es ja in der Category:Werner-Forßmann-Krankenhaus auch vorhanden ist, ist doch doppelt gemoppelt, oder? OTFW (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Ok, dann hast du natürlich Recht. Sorry. --Ralf Roleček 13:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-02-04-Parlement-européen-Strasbourg-RalfR-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-01-10-tbh-015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Suchoj-Superjet-100-RalfR-WMA 0556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-01-10-tbh-261-dieter-kuerten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ausgezeichnet! --Ermell 08:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Ciclistas-en-Mexico-RalfR-N3S 9000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 13:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:13-08-31-Kochtreffen-Wien-RalfR-N3S 7849-024.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-08-31-Kochtreffen-Wien-RalfR-N3S 7849-024.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Kathedrale-RalfR-WMA 0843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition made my eyes very happy. Someone might think this is not QI, however, as the pinacles are soft. -- RaboKarbakian 00:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Bad proposal, it's not the city, perhaps somethig of the city. In this case I think that is a good picture. Ugly subject IMO--Lmbuga 22:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Campeche-Straßenszene-RalfR-WMA 0882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-12-Mexico-D-F-RalfR-N3S 9027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Supporting as good enough, but someone else might oppose for the CA in the trees on left. Those girls must be sisters, eh? -- RaboKarbakian 08:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-15-Centro histórico de San Francisco de Campeche-RalfR-WMA 0789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 14:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Cs for Czech language

Cs (not Cz) used for Czech language in POTD templates. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Right, sorry. I'm already confused because i think, CeskoSlowenskia is CS an Czekia CZ... --Ralf Roleček 11:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, you can make it even better, if you raise the dark areas. --Hubertl 17:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Nutzungserlaubnis von einem Foto

Hi Ralf,

ich wollte ein Foto von dir in einem Artikel in deWP einbinden, bin aber aufgrund der umfangreichen und mit einem Warnhinweis versehenen Lizenzhinweise unsicher. Kannst du mir sagen, ob das Bild in der deWP eingesetzt werden kann? --Jensbest (talk) 22:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Na klar darfst du. Nur ist einigen Benutzern mit Freibiermentaslität frei nicht frei genug. --Ralf Roleček 04:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA 3302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tmp-scr.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tmp-scr.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Els Quatre Gats-RalfR-WMA 2729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the tree, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-02-23-fotoflugkurs-cux-by-RalfR-015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo, great composition. --ArildV 13:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-06-barcelona-RalfR-314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA 3322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 11:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA 3299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 11:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA 3289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA 3288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail, if a little underexposed --Daniel Case 05:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Mirador desde Park Guell-WMA 2914 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Sagrada Familia-WMA 3127-3136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (obwohl man evtl. mit einer Anpassung vom Ratio, sprich Länge/Breite Verhältnis evtl. ein besseres Ergebnis bekommt). --Poco a poco 00:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-25-SXF Atlasglobal A321-231 TC-ETF-WMA 2092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, despite the lady is wearing nothing --Hubertl 16:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Ripollet-RalfR-WMA 3008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 13:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-01-Schweriner See-RalfR-WMA 3263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3105.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3105.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-12-helsinki-RalfR-N3S 0810-391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-01-18-Lounge-Berlin-RalfR-DSCF1202-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-N3S 1244a-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice picture, nicely framed. Wonderful colors, sharpness is just so-so (diffraction kicking in at f/10?) Mid-day light causes harsh contrasts.--Hendric Stattmann 18:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image needs perspective correction and please remove the dust spot --Rolf H. 13:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Dust removed. Perspective is correct, this is 310mm! The buildigs are tiltet. --Ralf Roletschek 10:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Now, good quality. --Rolf H. 03:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Mirador desde Park Guell-WMA 2913 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments see marks - some faded areas, a lot of dust spots --Rolf H. 13:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Done new version --Ralf Roletschek 13:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)  Support now --Rolf H. 17:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:2010-04-25-breda-by-RalfR-01.jpg

Hallo, Ich arbeitete ein wenig das Bild, um die chromatische Aberration zu entfernen. Ich lasse Sie die Version finden Sie hier: fr:Fichier:Medium69 - Image de travail.jpg Wenn Sie zustimmen, lade ich auf dem Bild.

Hello, I worked a little bit your image to remove chromatic aberration. I let you see the version here: (file) If you agree, I upload on your image. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 02:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Of course you can edit the photo. The CA is too harsh and i don't have a RAW :-( --Ralf Roleček 04:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ok I'm doing this. It is true that shoot in RAW helps tremendously. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Wow! Great, thank you. --Ralf Roleček 13:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-06-20-shimano-600-RalfR-N3S 7903-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful sharpness, Nice close-up framing. Could you possibly do something about the blown-out metallic reflections? --Hendric Stattmann 18:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Done new version. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-04-25-breda-by-RalfR-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Cerdanyola del Vallès-WMA 2980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-04-25-breda-by-RalfR-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Chromatic aberration : see notes --Medium69 13:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC) right. --Ralf Roletschek 13:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC) @Ralf Roletschek: you can not the corrected? --Medium69 02:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC) CA corrected in agreement with the author. --Medium69 10:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Cerdanyola del Vallès-WMA 3158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Cerdanyola del Vallès-WMA 2993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now --Hubertl 15:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sherlock Holmes Museum in Baker St 221b 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What we need to see is in focus --Daniel Case 06:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Enough in focus for QI --Daniel Case 06:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-31-Juliana-WMA 3213a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:13-04-13-st-poelten-rathausplatz-704.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-04-13-st-poelten-rathausplatz-704.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speedhub 500-14 vs. Shimano Alfine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-09-29-Hörumer Odde-RalfR-N3S 9146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Cerdanyola del Vallès-WMA 3048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Cerdanyola del Vallès-WMA 2994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-oder-sw-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Insufficient quality. --Medium69 15:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC) It's a ISO 400 bw film, the grain is normal. --Ralf Roletschek 12:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC) ok no problem. --Medium69 15:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Maribor-RalfR-WMA 4234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail --Daniel Case 15:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent detail --Daniel Case 15:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another tasty-looking drink. Are you tending bar on the side? --Daniel Case 15:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-04-13-st-poelten-pathausplatz-714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --Jacek79 20:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot on the left Livioandronico2013 15:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 17:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-26-RalfR-WLC-0090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted/layout

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4301.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A.Savin 23:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4300.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A.Savin 23:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4180.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A.Savin 23:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4177.jpg

Template:Autotranslate A.Savin 23:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Machst du

jetzt den Sack mit den VI zu? ;-) --Geiserich77 ([[User talk:Geiserich77|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Irgendwie muß ich dir ja in den Nacken kriechen ;) --Ralf Roleček 20:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Puh, ich glaub da hast du mich schneller überholt als du glaubst. Gegen so viele Nominierungen bei VIC komm ich glaub ich (hauptsächlich) schreibend nicht an.--Geiserich77 ([[User talk:Geiserich77|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Naja, ich muß mich auch ganz schön strecken, anders als in den ersten 3 Runden. Sooo viele Reserven habe ich auch nicht mehr. Vielleicht wird es ja ein Patt? --Ralf Roleček 20:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Darüber können wir noch reden ;-) --Geiserich77 ([[User talk:Geiserich77|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4302.jpg

Template:Autotranslate — Yerpo ^Eh? 18:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

File:15-11-25-Maribor Innenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4285.jpg

Template:Autotranslate — Yerpo ^Eh? 07:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:11-09-04-iaa-by-RalfR-103.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Use of image outside Wikimedia world

[1], publish about photo of the day, attributed as requested in the description. -- RTA 13:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist ([[User talk:Tremonist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Sehr geehrter Herr Roletschek

Da Sie mit Ihren Fotos in der Wikipedia nahezu omnipräsent sind, habe ich Verständnis dafür, dass Sie die Übersicht über eventuelle nicht-linzenzkonforme Nutzung nicht selbst haben können und diese einem Anwalt überlassen.

Kein Verständnis habe ich allerdings dafür, dass dieser Anwalt von einem minderjährigen Schüler, der ein Referat mit einem Ihrer Fotos illustriert, dieses Referat auf seine private Homepage hochgeladen und aus Unkenntnis die Lizenzbestimmungen verletzt hat, 500 € verlangt. Ein Hinweis hätte genügt, und der gutwillige Schüler, der bis dahin sehr dankbar war, ein so gutes Bild gefunden zu haben, hätte die Namensnennung gemäß der Bestimmungen ergänzen können.

Die entsprechende Seite ist längst gelöscht, der Vorfall ist auch schon ein wenig her und die Eltern des Schülers haben die Abmahnung ignoriert. Aber das Vertrauen in die Redlichkeit von Wikipedia-Autoren ist bei dem jungen Menschen und seiner Umgebung unwiderruflich zerstört.

Ein sehr enttäuschter Lehrer Template:Unsigned

Es liegt mir fern, einen Schüler und private Homepages abzumahnen. Was ich gesehen habe, war Werbung für eine Musikgruppe und Konzerte. Hätten sich die Eltern beim Anwalt gemeldet und die Sache klargestellt, wäre das Ganze längst aus der Welt. Das betroffene Foto (darum geht es doch?) kann wie alle meine Fotos für Bildungszwecke jederzeit auch ohne Einhaltung irgendwelcher Lizenzen frei verwendet werden. Das habe ich immer so gehandhabt und daran wird sich auch nichts ändern. Ich habe in der Homepage wie gesagt Werbung für eine Musikgruppe gesehen, mit Live-Viedos von Konzerten usw.

Mir bleibt nur, mich zu entschuldigen, ich habe das falsch eingeschätzt. Die ganze Sache ist hiermit erledigt. Woher sollte ich wissen, daß es sich um einen Schüler handelt (und ein Schulreferat), wenn die Homepage eine Band bewirbt? --Ralf Roleček 20:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Ping Geschätzter, sehr enttäuschter Lehrer! Da sie sich zwar angemeldet haben, aber ganz offensichtlich es verhindern wollen dass man sie per Mail kontaktiert (was schon etwas eigenartig anmutet), schreibe ich das nun hier öffentlicht.

Ich bin zwar auch nicht begeistert, wenn immer sofort ein Anwalt eingeschalten wird, wenn es um Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Zusammenhang mit Wikipediainhalten geht, kann aber die Argumente von Herrn Roletschek wie dargelegt nachvollziehen. Allerdings bin ich schon etwas verblüfft, dass sie die Schuld an der ganzen Sache beim bösen Wikipedianer suchen und nicht bei sich selbst. Ja, bei sich, nicht bei Herrn Roletschek und nicht beim Schüler. Sie als Lehrer sollten inzwischen schon mitbekommen haben, dass heute zu einem großen Teil das Internet die Quelle für Referate von Schülern ist. Dass damit verbunden es auch immer wieder Konflikte gibt, das ist ihnen selbstverständlich bekannt. Das Drücken auf die Tränendrüse, der arme minderjährige Schüler wird von einem Anwalt angeschrieben, geht definitiv ins Leere, meiner Meinung nach. Nichts sieht ein Lehrer im Grunde genommen weniger gern, als dass sich die Schüler das erarbeiten von Inhalten ersparen und einfach mit Copy/Paste eine Arbeit hinrotzt. Dasselbe gilt natürlich für Bilder. Man muss nicht mehr die Füße in die Hand nehmen und selbst auf Motivsuche gehen, man ergoogelt sich einfach ein Bild und schon hat man das beste Bildmaterial.

Sie waren es, der dieses Referat gelesen und beurteilt hat. Niemand anderer. Ist ihnen nicht in den Sinn gekommen, bei ihrem nachzufragen, von wo er das Bild hat? Ob es sein eigenes ist (was schwerlich sein kann, denn die Qualität ist mit einer einfachen Kamera alleine nicht zu erreichen), oder ob er es von wo hergeholt hat. Das hätte automatisch zu der Urheberrechtsüberlegung geführt. Aber sie lesen das durch als ob sie das als Lehrer nichts angeht.

Wenn sie als Lehrer nicht hergehen, und genau darüber mit den Schülern sprechen, wer sonst? Ich weigere mich zu glauben, dass Wikimedia und überhaupt das Internet Neuland ist für Sie. Seit vielen Jahren läuft die Diskussion über Urheberrechtsverletzungen. Aber was machen sie? Sie ignorieren das - auf ziemlich unglaubwürdige Art - und reden von einem armen minderjährigen, fast schon von einem Anwalt geschändeten Schüler. Ich kann darauf nur antworten, dass es in Ihrer Verantwortung liegt, ihren Schülern ein Grundmaß an Medienkompetenz zu vermitteln. Und dazu gehören eben auch die Grundlagen des Urheberrechts. Und dass es Unterschiede gibt zwischen Freiem Bildmaterial, Bildmaterial, welches frei verwendet werden kann, aber nur unter bestimmten Bedingungen und dass es Bildmaterial gibt, welches nur verwendet werden kann, wenn man es kauft.

Ich bin seit Jahren aktiv in der Schulung von Schülern und Lehrern, ebenso als Vortragender an der Universität Wien. Und zwar genau zu diesem Thema und weiß genau, wie das läuft. Mein dringlicher Rat an Sie: Bringen sie sich die Grundlagen selbst bei, das ist zumutbar, und vermitteln sie das auch an Schüler. Damit können sie verhindern dass es zu solchen unliebsamen Zwischenfällen kommt.

Wenn sie das nicht machen, dann machen sie sich als Lehrer selbst unglaubwürdig. Wir sind am Sprung ins Jahr 2016.

Mit besten Grüßen aus Wien --Hubertl 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC) PS: Sie dürfen mir gerne auch ein Mail per Wikipedia-Mailfunktion schicken.

Hallo Herr Tarys, nehmen sie die Schelte locker! 99% der Fotoeinsteller sind sozusagen tolerante, die nicht gleich mit Abmahnungen daherkommen, weil die Lizensbestimmungen nicht auf Punkt und Beistrich eingehalten wurden. Sozusagen sind das Wikipedianer, die mit Herz und Leib im eigentlichen Wikipediasinn werken und nicht um Einkommensverhältnisse aufzubessern. Mir z.B. reicht die Namensnennung und wenn nicht, dann denke ich mir: OK, sollte nicht sein, aber was soll's. Gruß Bwag ([[User talk:Bwag|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:29, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Mir reicht die Namensnennung auch vollkommen. Im Bereich Bildung verzichte ich darauf. Aber der hiesige Fall lag anders. Die Homepage bewarb eine Band mit Konzerten usw. Es war nicht ersichtlich, daß es sich dabei um einen Schüler handelt. Am Foto stand Nichts, weder Urheber noch Lizenz. Aber das ist jetzt erledigt, ich mahne keine Schüler ab. Wenn ich es nur weiß. Hätten die Eltern aufs Anwaltsschreiben reagiert, wäre das längst aus der Welt. --Ralf Roleček 21:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Sehr geehrter Herren,

leider bellen Sie den falschen Baum an. Das genannte Referat hatte ich damals nicht gelesen, da die Erstellung vor meiner Unterrichtszeit in diesem Kurs lag. Die Geschichte erzählte mir der Schüler, als ich in Vorbereitung eines Projektes explizit und sehr ausführlich auf die nicht nur hiesigen Lizenzregeln hingewiesen und diese hauptsächlich mit der Fairness gegenüber den Erstellern von Werken egal welcher Art begründet habe. Leider hat der junge Mann von dem, wie gesagt, schon etwas länger zurückliegenden Vorfall einen Eindruck zurückbehalten, den ich hier besser nicht wiedergebe.

Ansonsten handelte es sich nicht um ein Bandfoto, sondern um ein technisches Bild, das der Schüler nicht hätte selbstständig erstellen können.

Meine Enttäuschung bezieht sich ausdrücklich auf die Tatsache, dass sofort mit einer Abmahnung gekommen wurde. Vielleicht wäre vor der Geldforderung eine Nachfrage zielführender gewesen.

In Anbetracht Ihrer Antworten glaube ich nicht, dass sich meine Hoffnung auf ein weniger schnelles Handeln in solchen Fällen erfüllen kann.

Mit freundlichen Grüße Tarys Template:Unsigned

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

File:15-11-25-Maribor Innenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4287.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)