User talk:Pko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Note: If you want me answer quickly, better contact me in English by my discussion page on Polish Wikipedia: pl:Dyskusja Wikipedysty:Pko.

Thanks a lot for helping to index the Russian Empire pictures.--Eloquence

Image:Gdansk sztych ok 1628.jpg[edit]

Hi, you wrote that this is an etching. Are you quite certain it is not an engraving? Thuresson 06:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. I assume that the german word "stich" has something to do with Kupferstich which is the same as Miedzioryt. Hence this is not an etching but an engraving. Thuresson 23:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:P2280181.JPG[edit]

Nice pictures! But I think this one is a duplicate.

When you mark duplicate for deletion, please give a link to the other image. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

kościół mariacki[edit]

Nie ma za co, staram się w miarę regularnie przeglądać kategorię:Kraków. A co do tytułu artykułu, to osobiście byłabym za St. Mary church in Krakow, a tu: Kościół Mariacki w Krakowie stworzyć redirect. Cancre 18:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Przeniosłam do St. Mary's church in Kraków (zadecydowała większa liczba trafień w googlach, czyli ta forma jest popularniejsza :-), zrobiłam też redirect (Kościół Mariacki w Krakowie). Pzdr Cancre 18:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Kategoryzacja zdjęć zwierząt[edit]

Jeśli nie zauważyłeś zdjęcia zwierząt są umieszczane w galeriach i to te galerie sa kategoryzowane. Po kiego grzyba dodałeś kategorie do grafiki Image:Craesus septentrionalis1.jpg (o utworzeniu kategorii dublującej galerię nie wspomne) Nemo5576 18:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, ale robisz bałagan, i nie wiem czemu to ma słuzyć. Nemo5576 19:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Właśnie doczytałem. Na Commons jest koszmarny bałagan. Z jednej strony na Commons:Pierwsze kroki piszą uwaga: kategoria powinna być dodana do artykułu, nie do strony pliku, a tu wymagają żeby kategoryzować pliki :( W category:Firearms mam ten sam problem. Co pousuwam kategorie plikom umieszczonym w galeriach to zaraz jakiś bystrzak mnie rewertuje i ciągle mam bałagan. Zainteresowany jestem, ale moja znajomość angielskiego jest delikatnie mówiąc nędzna i w dyskusjach na commons nie uczestnicze. Moim zdaniem galerie i kategorie powinny być traktowane co najmniej równorzędnie (tzn. grafika musi być albo w galerii albo w kategorii) Nemo5576 19:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Tyle tylko ze w galerie moge sobie podzielić na kilka części (np. tak jak w M16 czy M60) czy dodać opisy pod grafikami. W kategorii najczęściej jest bałagan bo grafiki ułozone są alfabetycznie. Nie mówie juz o takim drobiazgu że zmiany w kilkudziesięciu galeriach w jednej kategorii moge sprawdzić jednym kliknieciem, a zmiany w kilkudziesięciu podkategoriach kilkudziesięcioma (a sprwdzać trzeba bo ludzie potrafią różne cuda robić [1]). Galerie mają jedną wade. Faktycznie trzeba o nie dbać. Nemo5576 20:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
No i "aktualność" zaleceń, oraz "łatwość" z jaką porozumiewa się róznojęzyczny tłum na Commons powoduje ze ja uprawiam swoją partyzantkę po cichu i bez ogladania się na innych :) Może to i egoistyczne, ale jak na razie nikt mi zbytnio nie przeszkadza. Nemo5576 21:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Quality images promotion[edit]

Hi, thank you for your good work on Quality images. However, I noticed that you've just moved pictures that I reviewed more than two days agor from Commons:Quality images candidates to Commons:Quality images. I think you should allow at least 2 day after the review of an image before either promote it or discard it. This is because in some cases, there is a need for consensual review. This shouldn't be too much of an issue on the images you've just promoted, but please make sure to observe this grace period next time.

But again, thank you for your very good work! CyrilB 16:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for kind words. I recognize the possibility of consensual review and didn't intend to move the pictures before 2 days passed from review. According to the guidelines, grace period is 2 days (48 hours), and the last picture I moved was reviewed at 29 Sep, 13:57 by Gnangarra [2], which means that 48-hour period had passed (admittedly only less than hour, but still). Or maybe different time zones have some meaning here, what should be taken into consideration. Anyway, believe me that I wanted to do everything according to rules. Pko 17:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I should have given more details. Actually, it appears that you have added Image:Papilio demoleus butterfly.jpg to Commons:Quality images (this is why i originally sent you this message, as I reviewed this image today), but you haven't removed it from Commons:Quality images candidates (I suppose this is an error). I have nothing to say about the other images, and I won't bother you for 1 hour out of 48! CyrilB 18:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image[edit]

Castle on an island, Tropea, Italy, Sep 2005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle on an island, Tropea, Italy, Sep 2005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

-- Alvesgaspar 11:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality image[edit]

Szydlowiec church town hall edited.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szydlowiec church town hall edited.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Alvesgaspar 08:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image[edit]

Torun SS Johns Mary Magdalene.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torun SS Johns Mary Magdalene.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Alvesgaspar 11:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:466px-Stanisław_Kostka_Potocki_-_grobowiec.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:466px-Stanisław_Kostka_Potocki_-_grobowiec.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Grudziadz kosciol pojezuicki wn.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Torun herb SP1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Torun Baszta Wartownia.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torun clinic at Uniwersytecka Str (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torun clinic at Uniwersytecka Str (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wloclawek katedra 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wloclawek katedra 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torun Dwor Mieszczanski 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torun Dwor Mieszczanski 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

CC-BY-2.5,2.0,1.0[edit]

Hi Pko, I see a lot of your images in Category:CC-BY-2.5,2.0,1.0 (for example File:Torun dw wschodni.jpg). Would you be willing to change the license from {{Cc-by-2.5,2.0,1.0}} to {{Cc-by-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}? My bot can do that for you, Multichill (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please change the licence where needed. Thanks. Pko (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok. Great. I'll update your images. Multichill (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Zdjecie lodowiska w Toruniu[edit]

Czesc, widzę że wykonywałeś zdjęcia w Toruniu. Czy dałbyś rade wykonać zdjęcie lodowiska w Toruniu, gdyż brakuje w commons? Znajduje się przy ul. św. Józefa 26. --Lowdown (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Zapewne masz rację. Ale chodzi mi tu o walor dokumentacyjny. Dotyczy to choćby artykułu o aktualnym sezonie Polskiej Ligi Hokejowej. W artykule na Wikipedii http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekstraliga_polska_w_hokeju_na_lodzie_(2011/2012) brak jest trzech widoków lodowisk klubów, w tym z Torunia. Z tego względu zasugerowałem Abyś wykonał takie zdjęcia. Jeśli nie jest to duży problem to prosiłbym o wykonanie. Pozdrawiam --Lowdown (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Aha, w takim razie zaszło chyba nieporozumienie. Jakiś czas temu napisałeś o jakimś lodowisku, zrozumiałem, że chodzi o Tor-Tor i dzisiaj wykonałem odpowiednie zdjęcia. Potem jeszcze raz przeczytałem Twoją wiadomość, w której właściwie była mowa lodowisku na Św. Józefa (tak naprawdę przy Szosie Chełmińskiej), które jest czysto rekreacyjne i nie ma większego znaczenia. Teraz widzę, że w artykule, na który się powołujesz, jest wymienione tylko lodowisko Tor-Tor, przy ul. Bema, czyli w sumie dobrze zrozumiałem. Trochę to zagmatwane, w każdym razie zdjęcie już umieściłem na Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Torun,_Poland,_Tor-Tor_skating_rink.jpg Pko (talk) 15:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Pko!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. odder (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Dzień dobry, Chciałam się zapytać, czy mogę użyć Twojego zdjęcia panorama Torunia jako tło na profil ogłoszeniowy na koncie Google+ i FB? Wiem, że licencja Wikipedii zezwala na uzycie, ale chciałam być fair wobec Ciebie. Czekam na odpowiedź - kapusta.ag@gmail.com Aknieszkaa (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)