User talk:Giorces
Thank you for uploading files on Commons.
Please add license tag(s) (see Commons:Copyright tags for more information) and author/source information. If you did it yourself please say this fact explicitly.
Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.
EugeneZelenko 15:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Re: Cancel Image
[edit]Please cancel - Image:Pizzigettone Torre Francesco 001.jpg - because error in name Giorces 23:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Deleted. You could use {{deletebecause|Replaced with XYZ}} for such purposes in future. --EugeneZelenko 05:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for uploading your files to Wikimedia Commons. There seems to be some license information missing regarding this particular file, however. Could you please fix this? Thank you--Orgullomoore 07:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Bourgoin.jpeg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bourgoin.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rocastelo(talk) 22:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Grazie per includere la licenza.--Rocastelo(talk) 10:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Almenno San Salvatore
[edit]Ciao orobico. Una curisità: SAn giorgio in lemine e pieve di lemine attualemente ricadono nel comune di Almenno San Salvatore? ciao e grazie, --mac 16:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Wilmarsh.jpeg
[edit]Pay attention to copyright | Image:Wilmarsh.jpeg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Nanae 18:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
This image is tagged as fairuseunsure in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wilmarsh.JPG --Nanae
Image deletion warning | Image:Papa Giovanni XXIII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Sicherlich Post 20:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC) .
OTRS
[edit]Ho inserito i ticket nelle immagini indicate nella mail. - Laurentius 19:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Full information needed
[edit]Hi, could you please copy all given information when transfering images from any other project. See e.g. here what is wanted and needed. Thanks --Überraschungsbilder 14:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Pontecalusco1.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Pontecalusco1.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 11:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Mars_et_Rhea.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Mars_et_Rhea.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 19:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Suisio1.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Suisio1.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 17:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Gneo Giulio Agricola a Bath.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Gneo Giulio Agricola a Bath.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 15:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Mercenari svizzeri.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Mercenari svizzeri.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 15:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Vari argomenti
[edit]- Innanzi tutto, benvenuto a Milano, dato che stavo stufandomi di essere il solo a caricare immagini sulla mia città. Ho visto oggi il tuo upload relativo alla tomba del Medeghino in Duomo e la cosa mi ha reso contento.
- Ciò detto, volevo però segnalarti che quando modifichi una immagine, non puoi cambiarne i termini della licenza, come hai fatto con questa mia foto di quel monumento. Sia chiaro, non mi faccio illusioni sul fatto che chi lavora fuori da Wikipedia se userà quella foto non rispetterà i termini della licenza che uso, che lo obbligherebbe a specificare sempre il nome dell'autore, e a trasmettere a chi userà la sua foto modificata lo stesso obbligo, ma almeno fra noi wikipediani possiamo esercitare un poco di fair play. Che ne dici? La licenza che uso è "virale", nel senso che "infetta" successivamente tutte le varie versioni delle opere che ne derivano. Tu sei libero di modificare, come hai fatto, ma la licenza di base resta sempre quella che ho scelto io, non puoi modificarla strada facendo. Ok?
- Lo stesso vale per una foto che - se non mi sbaglio a guardare - hai modificato ed hai indicato come tua: questa. Non contesto il tuo diritto di modificare le mie immagini: esso è espressamente previsto dalla licenza che ho scelto, ma daccapo, la "attribution" è obbligatoria. Il fatto che tu abbia modificato l'immagine non la rende tua, la rende una immagine mia e modificata da te. Hai diritto di firmare a tua volta la modifica, ma la licenza che ho scelto ti obbliga a indicare la fonte di partenza.
- Sia chiaro che sono convinto della tua buona fede, altrimenti non saresti su Wikipedia, volevo solo chiartirti un paio di punti.
- Cambiando argomento, desideravo pregarti di aiutarmi nel lavoro che sto facendo, cercando di catalogare e verificare le immagini relative all'Italia presenti su Commons, aggiungendo sempre almeno una categoria quando fai l'upload. In questo modo evitiamo di fare doppio lavoro. Se inserisci immagini e ritratti di personaggi, indica in categoria anche il personaggio stesso: i ritratti sono preziosi e scarsi. Parlo, ad esempio, di Bartolomeo Colleoni, su cui vedo che hai lavorato molto.
- Dai un'occhiata al lavoro che stiamo facendo sulla Nobiltà d'Italia. Se riesci ad aggiungere famiglie e blasoni, è tutto lavoro fatto in piu'. Se vuoi creare una categoria per le famiglie nobili di Bergamo, meglio ancora! Ora come ora non esiste.
- Infine, ti ho segnalato qui sopra due immagini di cui hai dimenticato di indicare la fonte e la provenienza. Dovresti cortesemene completare la didscalia e poi togliere l'avviso che ci ho messo. Grazie. Ciao e buon lavoro. --G.dallorto 18:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Romanico Lombardo
[edit]Il romanico lombardo e quello bergamasco sono ora nella categoria: Category:Romanesque architecture in Lombardy.
Ti risparmio la disquisizione sui pregi rispettivi delle due scelte, ti basti sapere che idealmente ogni immagine su Commons dovrebbe fare parte sia di una galleria sia di una categoria. Le gallerie sono piu' ordinate, ma la manutenzione va fatta a mano, ivi inclusa l'aggiunta di nuove immagini, le categorie sono piu' disordinate, ma sono aggiornate in tempo reale dal software. Quindi non è vero che le gallerie non servono piu', al contrario, sono un lavoro piu' sistematico ed ordinato rispetto al marasma (a volte) delle categorie.
Se vuoi categorizzare le tue immagini di San Giorgio in Lemine, indicami una immagine esemplificativa per te e ti ci creo direttamente lì la didascalia e le categorie che puoi poi copiare-e-incollare per tutte le altre (fatte salve ovviamente le differenze relative alla descrizione della singola immagine in quanto tale). Per me farlo è un piacere perché tu mi daresti un grosso aiuto nel lavoro che sto facendo, se ne facessi una parte tu. Grazie e buon lavoro. --G.dallorto 20:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Tuo messaggio
[edit]Sei salvo, adesso che richiami la mia attenzione, noto anche io che sotto la dida esiste un richiamo. Ma come giornalista ti dico che quel richiamo si percepisce poco, quindi ti suggerisco di aggiungere in calce alla voce anche un richiamo esplicito all'esistenza delle tue schede, con una frase del tipo: "Una presentazione analitica commentata delle opere d'arte presenti in questa chiesa si trova qui"... Visto che il lavoro lo hai fatto, tanto vale valorizzarlo, no?
Per la categorizzazione che ho fatto non preoccuparti: è il lavoro che mi sono auto-assegnato, che è rimettere ordine nelle immagini relative alla storia e all'arte italiana. A poco a poco quel trattamento va riservato a tutte le immagini presenti :-( . Diciamo anzi che la presenza di un vero e proprio ciclo organico d'immagini, come quello che hai caricato tu, rende le cose molto piu' semplici, perché le immagini sono già di fatto ordinate, e non occorre chiedersi come fare a dare loro un ordine categorizzandole. E poi si va avanti a copia-e-incolla.
La categoria "Arte romanica" esiste: Category:Romanesque art. Se clicchi sopra Category:Romanesque frescos in San Giorgio in Lemine e vai in basso alla pagina trovi il link per risalire a quella piu' generale. Piu' precisamente troverai: Category:Romanesque paintings in Italy che appartiene alla categoria Category:Romanesque paintings, che appartiene alla categoria Category:Romanesque art, che appartiene alla categoria Category:Medieval art, che appartiene... e così via. Quindi usando le categorie è facile spostarsi verso settori analoghi e magari ignoti. Il concetto sarebbe questo.
Ciao e grazie per la pazienza. --G.dallorto 13:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Galleria Colleoni
[edit]Ciao, la pagina a cui porta il link alla "Galleria Colleoni" è vuota. Dovresti correggerlo, per cortesia, se vuoi che io la veda.
Guarda che la categorizzazione non l'ho creata io, è una creazione della community, io ho solo adattato le categorie all'area italiana, dato che noi italiani siamo indietrissimo nella catalogazione (come mostra anche il tuo stupore :-) ). Se ti interessa dargli un'occhiata, l'albero delle categorie italiane è qui: Commons:Category scheme Italy. Puoi contribuire anche tu, se vuoi: è una pagina di lavoro e discussione, non è la Bibbia. E non è completa: andrebbe aggiornata a mano, ma si han sempre mille cose per la testa...
Sul prigione, non essere tu a farti male da solo. In Rete, dove si lavora tutti piu' rapidamente, i lapsus sono piu' comuni e quindi piuì veniali. Inoltre, il concetto di Wikipedia è che si mira alla perfezione del lavoro alla FINE del lavoro, non all'inizio. Non è certo per caso se tutti possono mettere mano al lavoro di tutti. E' in questo modo che i lapsus vengono scovati e corretti. Ricordati che non stiamo lavorando alla carta stampata, dove ogni errorino è eterno. Il problema, qui, semmai, è l'opposto: la labilità di tutto. Ou sont allées les nièges d'antan? E la mia correzione di ieri? ;-) Ciao --G.dallorto 13:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
- A mio parere il metodo che segui è adeguato. Al tuo posto creerei però una nuova categoria apposta per raccogliere tutte le gallerie che stai creando, ad esempio: [[Categoria:Gallerie d'arte commentate]] se su it:Wiki, o Category:Art galleries of Italy se qui su Commons. In questo modo sarebbe piu' facile rintracciarle tutte, se si è interessati.
- A latere, penso che tu ti scusi troppo. Temo tu non abbia compreso che Wikipedia si basa su un costante e interminabile lavoro di correzione reciproca. Il fatto che altri facciano cose che a noi non paiono corrette è dato per scontato. E il fatto che gli altri possano trovare sbagliate le nostre correzioni, pure. Il tuo esoso nipote farebbe meglio a sfotterti per non avere capito questo piu' che per altro. Qui TUTTI lavoriamo per tentativi ed errori, mica tu solo. Ripeto: TUTTI. Tanto è vero che quando carichi un file hai una opzione per tenere d'occhio le modifiche alle tue pagine. Se l'hai attivata, vai su "My watchilist", per vedere tutte le modifiche fatte a pagine caricate da te. Se non l'hai attivata, fallo: puoi aggiungere alla lista foto già caricate facendo clic su "Watch" nella loro pagina (tastino in alto, linguetta delle schede).
- Quello che conta è che qui nessuno ti chiede che il tuo lavoro sia perfetto: la solidità dell'impresa si basa non sulla qualità del singolo contributo, ma dalla sovrapposizione su di esso di centinaia e centinaia di controlli. Un errore può sfuggire a una, dieci o cento persone, ma quanto i controllori sono mille, alla fine tutti i lapsus vengono a galla. Quindi puoi rilassarti e lavorare con meno preoccupazioni: nessuno ti rimprovera o rampogna. E siccome tutti sappiamo che quanto scriviamo verrà controllato da tutti (ci sono persone il cui impegno su wikipedia è solo quello: verificare qualsiasi modifica fatta: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Recentchanges ) tutti non ci facciamo caso se ci scappa qualche errore. Quello che conta il risultato complessivo, e non il singolo contributo. Questa è una enciclopedia... Ciao.--G.dallorto 12:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Grgnano8.JPG
[edit]Hi, Can you remember why you wanted Image:Grgnano8.JPG deleted? It is sitting in "incomplete deletion requests" because the template was not fully filled out. Can you provide the rest of the information or take the deletion template off the picture? Thanks and regards, Deadstar 09:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have replaced your deletion template with a {{duplicate}} template, quoting the filename you gave me on my talkpage. Deadstar 07:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Roman sculptures
[edit]Per creare una categoria devi solo metterne il nome in fondo alla pagina così [[Category:Nome categoria]] e poi fare clic sul link rosso e creare la pagina come al solito, scegliendo la categoria "madre" in cui la tua nuova categoria rientra. Prima di farlo, però, fai sempre un controllo! Esiste già infatti Category:Ancient Roman sculpture e così pure Category:Ancient Roman mosaics, quindi avresti creato una categoria che avrebbe dovuto essere cancellata. Qui trovi l'Elenco delle categorie sull'Italia. Bacissimi. --User:G.dallorto 16:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleting pictures
[edit]Hi Giorces, I found a number of photographs tagged with {{deletebecause|there is a duplicate}}. In future, you can use {{badname|name of other file}} when you have uploaded a file under the wrong name & reuploaded it, or otherwise {{duplicate|name of other file}}. The commons deletion process is a bit different from other wikis. Kind regards, Deadstar 10:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:DyvekeSigbritsdochter.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:DyvekeSigbritsdochter.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:GiorcesCostaImagna.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
(fixed your request. However, I voted to keep as the two images are not the same.) --Deadstar 13:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message - I have mentioned the correct file (Image:GiorcesValsecca.JPG) on the request. In future, you can use {{duplicate|name of other file}} for those cases, that works a lot faster. Nice photos by the way :) Deadstar 07:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Lupa romana.jpeg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Lupa romana.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 11:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Zeus.jpeg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Zeus.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Strutturapeptide1.png
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Strutturapeptide1.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Schilpario_01.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Schilpario_01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 21:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Washington Murale su Swiss Inn Htl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Evrik 02:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Battagliatrasimeno.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Battagliatrasimeno.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:DyvekeSigbritsdochter.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:DyvekeSigbritsdochter.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Thuresson (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hatshepsut.jpeg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Hatshepsut.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Tarawneh (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Categorization
[edit]As a general practice, when an image is a category (A), which itself is in another category (B), then the image should not be placed in category B. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have undone your category addition of Category:Bahá'í Faith to File:Seat of the House of Justice.jpg since that file is in the Category:Seat of the Universal House of Justice category which itself is in Category:Bahá'í Arc --> Category:Bahá'í World Centre --> Category:Bahá'í places --> Category:Bahá'í Faith. Files should not be in a subcat and a supercat at the same time as I explained above. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Image:TheGreatestName.jpg is uncategorized since 12 July 2009.
- Image:Bonate Sopra1.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Once upon a time.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Budda Dickwella Sri Lanka.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Shahcheragh.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Could you check under which license this photo was available at the English Wikipedia? Was there a source (a book?) stated and who was the uploader at the English Wikipedia? --ALE! ¿…? 09:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Ciao. Il museo del duomo di Monza ha richiesto la cancellazione delle fotografie che lo riguardano. Nella categoria relativa è presente una tua fotografia (in oggetto). Dato che non è un problema di copyright non c'è l'obbligo per quanto riguarda Commons di cancellare il file; il problema riguarda solo il "contratto" fra te (visitatore del museo) e il museo stesso, quindi c'è bisogno della tua esplicita richiesta per cancellare il file (al fine di evitare problemi legali). Grazie--Trixt (talk) 21:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Done, file cancellato. Grazie--Trixt (talk) 23:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:CornoStella1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
malo (talk) 21:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
AAA Bergamaschi cercasi
[edit]Cioa Giorces, ci sarebbe bisogno di qualcuno vicino Bergamo che potesse fare delle foto dei rilievi alla base della facciata della Cappella Colleoni, a Bergamo Alta.. sono le Storie di Adamo ed Eva dell'Amadeo.. mi servirebbero x una voce su wiki. non è che ti capita di andarci uno di questi giorni? Oppure sapresti indirizzarmi verso qualcuno a cui girare la richiesta?? Sarebbe un bel implemento x la galleria orobica! ;) ciao e grazie --Sailko (talk) 11:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Grazie davvero!! Uno di quei rilievi sarebbe il precdente iconografico della Tempesta di Giorgione... avrei bisogno di vederlo e di aggiungerlo alla voce ;) --Sailko (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mammut2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mammut1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mammutino2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mamutino1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Shahcheragh.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 18:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Photo of King V. Emanualle
[edit]Dear Giorces,
Just want to inform you that I used your beautiful photo in my video/ vlog. You can watch in YouTube at GkJmdx6yrAo Thank you for sharing the photo.
Best Regards S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Basilica Autarena di Fara Gera d'Adda has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |