User talk:SamsonBVB

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Borussia Dortmund 1976 - 1978.png[edit]

File:Logo Borussia Dortmund 1976 - 1978.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Canalettoweg Pirna - Elbradweg (36054097370).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Canalettoweg Pirna - Elbradweg (36054097370).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Canalettoweg Pirna - Elbradweg (36054097370).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Oh no! Probably it was the reason of a wrong copy and paste. Sorry. I added the license into the photos.SamsonBVB (talk) 04:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Postcards[edit]

Hello SamsonBVB, thanks for uploading a lot of postcards. Please don't "marco eliminado". For example in File:Escuela_de_artes_aplicadas_de_dresde.jpg. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. Best regards. -- sk (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

????--SamsonBVB (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SamsonBVB, if you upload a postcard, than don't crop the margin of the postcards. You upload first this image and then crop it to this version. For COM:WPPC it is interesting that the complete postcard is on commons (including the address-side of the postcard). - What is your excellent source with all this old pictures from Dresden? - Can you add the Category:Postcards of Dresden, if the image is a postcard. Thanks. Best regards -- sk (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Es gibt unten die Dateiversionen. Das ist der Grund, warum ich die sinnlosen weißen Rahmen entfernte. Die Dateiversionen zeigen aber den Originalzustand der Postkarte, der somit ja erhalten bleibt. Ok. Aber ich will bei den Portraitaufnahmen hier den Rahmen entfernen, der bleibt aber auch in den Dateiversionen und Quelle erhalten. Der stört aber nur in der Betrachtung, weil immer Dasselbe dort steht. Ja. Category postcards of Dresden. Ja. Ich habe das nicht verheimlicht. https://altesdresden.de/ Das ist die Quelle, aber auch andere Quellen. Ich habe aber mich als Quelle angegeben, weil ich eben die Quelle bin und die Homepage ja wieder irgendwann geschlossen sein kann und auch das Sammeln und Bearbeiten von mir gemacht wird (Kontrast, Farbe, Helligkeit). Ich bin die Einzigste, die hier diese Bilder hochladen tut. Daher ist da Zeitdruck bei mir vorhanden. Sobald ich das nicht schaffe, sind die restlichen Bilder dann auch weg und verloren. Bei den Kategorien gefällt mir nicht, dass ich hier einfach nicht die Namen stehen habe. Beispiel wie es sein sollte: Max Kühn (Phtographer). Aber es steht dann als Beispiel: Postcards published by Kunstverlag Max Kühn. Das ist ein wenig zu umständlich. Kein Mensch gibt bei der Suche Kunstverlag und published ein. Die Namen werden ja auch immer seltener. Also braucht man das nicht so umständlich machen. Die Quelle hat ungefähr ordentlich 10000 Postkarten. Ja, mann kann auch einen Spezialupload machen, aber da habe ich keinen Zugang. Beschriftet sein muss es ja trotzdem. Es fehlen Leute, die hochladen. Problem ist aber, dass hier dann von mir bestimmt doppelt hochgeladen wird, weil die Einen so hochladen und ich wieder in besserer Kontrastqualität hochlade. Die Stadt Dresden hat kein Inderesse an den Postkarten und Portraitaufnahmen von damals, obwohl man so ein Interesse vortäuscht. In Paris sammeln die bei der Stadt im Museum exzessiv danach und horten das. --SamsonBVB (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo SamsonBVB, erstmal vielen Dank, dass du auf deutsch antwortest, das macht die Kommunikation deutlich leichter. Ich war mir nicht sicher ob du nicht eher ein spanischer Wikipedianer bist, weil deine hochgeladenen Bilder immer so spanische Dateinamen und Beschreibungstexte haben. - Mit Jörg Brune dem Betreiber von altesdresden.de, hab ich schon mal vor einiger Zeit gesprochen und wir haben intensiv überlegt, wie wir am besten die Bilder sauber nach Commons hochbekommen. 1. Problem: Er hatte nicht für alle Bilder eine Quelle. 2. Problem: Zahlreiche Bilder kommen von Sammlern, die sie ihm zur Verfügung gestellt haben, die aber nicht die Bilder bei Wikipedia sehen wollten. 3. Problem: Ich wollte gerne bei dem Bild ein Link zurück zu altesdresden setzen, aber da gab es keine eindeutige ID für das Bild/Objekt. - Naja, wie dem auch sei, aus Zeitmangel haben wir das Projekt aktuell nicht weiter verfolgt. - Ich hab im März 2020 das Projekt COM:WPPC angefangen und versuche dort mal bei den Postkarten etwas Ordnung reinzubringen. Das Kategoriensystem hat seine Vor- und Nachteile, aber zum Glück wird ja auf Commons an den Strukturierten Daten gearbeitet, die vielleicht in Zukunft das Kategoriensystem überflüssig machen können. Mal schauen. - Wenn du technische Fragen zu Massenuploads hast, dann kann ich dir gerne weiterhelfen. Beim Projekt Commons:Brück & Sohn/de habe ich in einer Woche 30.000 Bilder hochgeladen. - Das nur du Bilder hochlädst ist nicht ganz korrekt (Siehe: User:Derbrauni/NeuesDresden), aber da hast dir einige sehr schöne Quellen erschlossen. Ich habs bei Stadtmuseum Dresden versucht, aber nach langen Diskussionen dort im Haus, kam man nur auf eine CC-BY-NC-ND-Lizenz bei diesen sehr alten Bildern. Das ist leider nicht kompatibel mit Commons. - Ich weiß nicht ob du in DD ab und an bist, aber vielleicht hast du ja Lust (nach Corona) mal auf einen Stammtischabend vorbei zukommen (de:Wikipedia:Dresden). Aktuell geht aber nur Videokonferenz. Beste Grüße -- sk (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Ich lade aber meist nur Belle Epoque Bilder hoch. Drittes Reich und Weimarer Republik nicht. Erst recht keine DDR Bilder. Ab 1918 oder so, könnte man nicht mehr so einfach pd-old nutzen. Die ganzen Bilder von mir hier vom alten Dresden, sind sehr alt und Public Domain. Die kann ein Museum in Dresden auch horten. Die wollen das aber nicht. Der überwiegende Anteil ist aber public domain. Die Portraitaufnahmen sind auch vorzeigbar und stellen die Personen ja vorbildlich da. Die sind von 1845 bis 1914. Die Seite altesdresden.de, hat aber hier auch die meisten Photos, die wirklich schon public domain sind und hochgeladen werden dürfen. Wenn es ein Foto ist, was ein ehemaliges Haus zeigt, dann ist es so, dass diese Person das nicht verbieten darf es zu zeigen, wenn es schon alt ist. Die Portraitaufnahmen sind so gemacht, dass man eben die Leute sieht und keinen Rahmen, der sehr breit ist. Die Portraitaufnahmen zeigen die Personen von damals. Alle kennen diese vielen Fotos von Dresden, aber nicht die Leute von damals. Viele Eliten (ohne drittes Reich und DDR) von damals, existieren heute nur noch als Nachfahren in der Unterschicht oder deren Linien sind ausgestorben.

Das Stadtmuseum gibt falsche Lizenzen an, bei Bildern, die schon deutlich public domain sind und auch zu den ersten Photographien überhaupt gehören. Wenn es Bilder von später als 1914 bei mir sind, dann sind die doch noch zu frisch für public domain. Ich schätze das aber nur so.--SamsonBVB (talk) 12:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also du würdest mir eine Freude machen, wenn du bei den Postkarten einfach nur als Kategorie "Postcards of Dresden" mit dazu setzt, um den Rest kümmer ich mich dann. Da kannst du dann auch einfach nur den Fotografen kategorisieren und ich räume die dann in die Kategorie "Postcards published by ..." ein. Manchmal erkennt man halt nicht im nachhinein, ob es nur ein Foto oder nur wirklich eine Ansichtkarte ist. Problem sind aber solche Verlage, die nicht nur Postkarten gemacht haben (z.B. Stengel & Co.), deshalb gibt es einmal die Verlagskategorie und dann die Postkarten-Unterkategorie. - Die Sache mit den falschen Lizenzen ist nicht ganz so einfach. Ich hab im Januar einen Vortrag über Wikipedia und Ansichtskarten in Oschatz vor einem Sammlerstammtisch gehalten (Vortragsfolien) Wenn du auf Seite 26 schaust, dann siehst du, das dort viele Rechte haben können an einem Bild. Und gerade mit dem Stadtmuseum wollte ich eine Einigung erzielen. Der Fachbegriff für die falsche Lizenz ist de:Copyfraud, aber auf eine juristische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Museum hab ich keine Lust. Selbst in dem Museum ist man gespaltener Meinung. Die Freunde einer freieren Lizensierung konnten sich diesmal aber noch nicht durchsetzen. Es gibt aber zum Glück für uns Wikipedianer auch so genug zu tun. Z.B. Hat vor einiger Zeit das Rijksmuseum Amsterdam tausende Bilder hochgeladen, viele noch unkategorisiert: Category:Uncategorized images of the Rijksmuseum. Da konnte ich zahlreiche Bilder mit Dresdenbezug entdecken. z.B. Category:Stereo cards of Dresden. --sk (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Klagen können alle aber nicht alle dürfen es. Das Gericht bestimmt, ob die Klage angenommen wird und nicht Unwissende! Es ist so selten so, dass Privatpersonen sagen, dass ein Nachfahre auf dem Bild ist und dann Recht haben darauf, wenn sie es so haben. Das kommt aber so bei mir nie vor. Das ist was eher bei Memes, die im Internet kreiert werden. Oder ich nutze so ein Bild und mache damit Werbung oder ein Firmenlogo und habe dann einen Konzern daraus gemacht. Das wird aber in Dresden heute nicht mehr passieren. Ohne Vermarktung kann man bis zu 20000 € an Strafe bekommen. Wenn man das genau nimmt, ist man bei 1914 im Jaein. An vielen Fotos kann man nur erkennen, dass man anhand der Mode oder der Straßenbahnen die Zeit erkennt. Oder anhand der Vergilbung. Ab Mitte 20er Jahre sieht man schärfere Bilder. Für die Richterin ist es so, dass erst einmal ein Schaden für eine Person erkennbar sein muss. Dann muss sich aber gleichbleibend eine Harmonie anstreben. Sie muss mit den Gesetzen eine Logik und Sinn schützen. DAs aber bei den Gesetzgebung. Das bedeutet nicht seelischen, politischen oder wirtschaftlichen Schutz. Die Leute sind dann im Museum nicht geeignet vom Charakter und haben wahrscheinlich eine narzistische Störung. Zumindest wissen die nicht, was die tun und haben oft Verbindungen zu Auslandsgeheimdiensten, wo man seinen Lohn dann bekommt, wenn man bestimmte Dinge tut. Außerdem glaube ich nicht, dass es nur 2700 Fotos sind, die das Stadtmuseum hat. Das müssen für Dresden viel mehr gewesen sein. Die haben wahrscheinlich für Geld hier alles gemacht und alles weggeschmissen. Es sieht niemand und kann niemand beweisen. Sobald das möglich ist, kommt es bei Vielen zu unmoralischen Handeln und so. Gerade wenn mann dann noch Geld bekommt. Das Stadtmuseum Dresden mit seinen westlich eingestellten Leuten, hat auch nicht einmal das Interesse, digital von Bartko und Reher zu downloaden und zu warten, bis man es theoretisch zeigen kann. Einfach nur herunterladen und kostenlos, ist denen zuviel. Außerdem ist es nicht nachvollziehbar, dass ein Atelier durchschnittlich 10000 bis 30000 Fotos hat und ein Gutes 100000, die ganzen Fotos bei Bartko und Reher landen. Aus allen deutschen Städten. Ich habe gefragt, ob die das abgegeben haben. Gerade in Dresden ist das komplett. Auch immer dieselbe Aufmachung vom Rahmen. Ich selber wurde schon gewarnt wegen den Bildern. Wegen Rechts. Tja. Ich zeige die Bilder und das bedeutet nicht, dass ich die abgebildete Person bin. ... Es gibt in Dresden echt Touristen, die denken, dass die Semperoper vom Hitler gebaut wurde. Weil die Architektur so sei. Stadtmuseum Dresden "Viele Postkarten mit Reichshintergrund oder NS Hintergrund, haben wir verkauft und vergeben.". Tja. Die rund 2700 Bilder sind nur ein Rest. Ich kann es nicht bestätigen, aber dort arbeitet eben der Geheimdienst von Sachsen und die arbeiten mit ihren USA und Briten so gerne zusammen, weil man solche schönen und raren Arbeitsplätze bekommt; als Lohnzusatz. Natürlich Dokumente mit Unterschrift und Stempel habe ich nicht dazu, aber es gibt dafür andere Möglichkeiten, die ich nicht nenne. --- Stammtisch. Ja, kann ich kommen. In der SLUB. Ich kann das wieder vergessen, weil soviele Fotos hochzuladen sind. Spanisch kann man gut hier lernen. Aber Kategorien müssen in Englisch beschriftet sein, wenn es keine Eigennahmen sind. Ich wollte nur mal sagen: Grünes Gewölbe und wie die Angestellten sich für den Schutz dort interressiert haben. SamsonBVB (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die 2700 Bilder sind nur die Porträts dieser einen Sammlung im Stadtmuseum. Klar haben die noch weitere Sammlungen z.B. 15.000 Postkarten. Aber bitte lass die Geheimdienst weg. - Professionelle Ansichtskartenhändler machen das Geschäft gleich zweimal. Erst wird die Ansichtkarte verkauft, und später nochmal das digitalisierte Bild. (Siehe Presse => akpool.de und www.arkivi-bildagentur.de - Deshalb bin ich so interessiert, die Postkarten auf Commons für alle frei verfügbar zu machen und freue mich über deine Engagement. -- sk (talk) 14:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Tja. Ich rede nicht sinnlos und es ist nötig. Außerdem geht es mir um das Ergebnis und nicht um das Gefallen! Das Ergebnis ist für alle Seiten gut. Die Portraits haben die digitalisiert und Downloader dürfen das herunterladen. Die Leute von den Institutionen haben schon lange ihr Gesicht verloren und können nur das anbieten, was vor 120 Jahren erreicht wurde was schön ist. Die können auch reinschreiben, dass die 100000 Post-Fotos angeblich haben. Außerdem war Dresden eine Kammerastadt und da muss es massenweise Fotos geben als Identitätsnachweis. Ich glaube es nicht. Ich habe nie eine Postkartenausstellung die letzten 20 Jahren dort gesehen. SamsonBVB (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas Pirna simple.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escudo de armas Pirna simple.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MaxxL - talk 20:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas de Pirna simple.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escudo de armas de Pirna simple.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MaxxL - talk 20:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#SamsonBVB. puppeteering.

@Stefan Kühn: Kannst Du mal bitte mit abstimmen? Es gibt sonst zu wenige Bilder. Begründung habe ich dort geschrieben. --SamsonBVB (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin kein Admin auf Commons, nur in de.wikipedia.org. Ich kann das hier nicht beurteilen. Vielleicht kann sich User:32X das mal anschauen. -- sk (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Exposición de arte alemán - dama bella época Dresde.jpg

And also:

File:Exposición de arte alemán - hermana de la caridad bella época Dresde.jpg

Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transgender_and_transsexual_women_of_Dresden[edit]

Transgender and transsexual women of Dresden has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 05:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo completo de ciudad Pirna (dibujo).svg[edit]

File:Escudo completo de ciudad Pirna (dibujo).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxxL - talk 19:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MaxxL - talk 12:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg[edit]

File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxxL - talk 12:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saxonian arms[edit]

Hello, can you stop changing the saxionian escutcheon on Belgian arms : the royal decrees setting up Belgian royal heraldry define the saxonian arms as barry of 10, or and sable. Not sable and or. Kathisma (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wettin coat of arms is definied as beginning with black and yellow from above.

No!--SamsonBVB (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand : the Belgian royal house has ruled to use or and sable. It is a sovereign act of law which prevails over any other definition. Kathisma (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have nothing to rule and you are not the Wettin House! You have no official soures but I do! --SamsonBVB (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't rule anything : the arrêté royal (royal dercee) of the 13rd july 1880 says : "Les armes de Notre Royale Maison sont : De sable, au lion d’or, armé et lainpassé de gueules, chargé sur l’épaule d’un écusson burelé d’or et de sable de dix pièces au crancelin ou couronne de rue de sinople, brochant en bande sur le tout." The arrêté royal of 12th July 2019 says "Nos armes sont de sable, au lion d'or, armé et lampassé de gueules, chargé sur l'épaule d'un écusson burelé member d'or et de sable de dix pièces, au crancelin de sinople, brochant en bande sur le tout." Which means that the head and most senior of the House of Wettin in Belgium (the king of the Belgians) has decided to use OR AND SABLE. Kathisma (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kathisma: I have reported that matter here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Coat_of_arms_of_the_Wettin_House_/Saxony_begins_with_black_not_with_yellow_from_above SamsonBVB (talk) 16:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of the Border Troops of East Germany.svg[edit]

File:Emblem of the Border Troops of East Germany.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

If the license of a file is incorrect, please correct it or nominate the file for deletion instead of removing the license template. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: Problem solved.For me it is not the Federal German symbol but in the German reunification contracts is written that the GDR was for a short time the FRG and the coat of arms too. (In the matter of the era of 1990.) --SamsonBVB (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsches Jungvolk Bannfahne 177 Pirna.svg[edit]

File:Deutsches Jungvolk Bannfahne 177 Pirna.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxxL - talk 11:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsches JungVolk FanfarenTuch Pirna.svg[edit]

File:Deutsches JungVolk FanfarenTuch Pirna.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxxL - talk 11:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gnom (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Demolished buildings in Dresden[edit]

Hallo SamsonBVB. Ich wollte kurz fragen nach dem Grund für deine zahlreichen Änderungen wie diese. Hier zum Beispiel geht es ja um die Ratsbaderei, was ja ein zerstörtes Gebäude in Dresden ist. Wenn ich also mal einen Artikel darüber schreiben wollte würde ich durchaus in dieser Kategorie nach Bildern schauen. Wo sonst? Gruß, --Derbrauni (talk) 07:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Derbrauni: Mir gefällt es nicht, wenn ich die Diashow anschalte und dann immer diese Bauzeichnungen (Grobe) angezeigt werden. Die Zeichnungen sind ok, aber die Bauzeichnungen liebe ich nicht. Die kann man doch in der anderen Kategorie lassen. Kann man nicht die Kategorie gleich komplett in die "Demolished" reinnehmen, ohne Bilder, weil es so viele Bilder sind? Die Bilder in der Kategorie sind da drinnen, weil es für die Adresse ja nur ein paar sind und nicht 20 für ein Gebäude. Oder kann man auch eine Kategorie machen, für die Häuser, die das schöne Dresden repräsentieren? Es wäre im Moment so am Besten, wenn man aus Ihrer Kategorie die Außenansichten und Parkzeichnungen in die Demolished Kategorie mit einbezieht und die Kategorie gleich mit, wo diese in der Zeitschrift gescannt wurden. Aber die Gebäudegrundrisse in der Masse, sehen nicht so gut aus und verhindern den tollen Überblick. Oder man macht eine neue Kategorie: "Blueprints of buildings of Dresden before 1945". Das wäre dann auch logisch. Also Respekt habe ich schon, da hier ja keine Bloggerseite ist. Da könnte man zum Beispiel auch Berechnungen für Baustoffe machen und die für die jeweilige Adresse grafisch abbilden und dann auch in die Kategorie bringen. Man kann es eben auch einbringen, aber mir gefallen die Bauzeichnungen nicht. Die Bauzeichnungen gibt es im Stadtarchiv und Bauamt von der Stadt Dresden und in der SLUB teilweise, im Original. Eigentlich gibt es von allen zerbombten Häusern der Belle Epoque hier in Dresden noch Bauzeichnungen im Original und man kann das nachbauen. Auch reicht für einen Architekten das auch aus, wenn der ein paar Fotos sehen würde, solange es keine Frauenkirche ist. Man muss die Kopien von den Originalbauplänen der Häuser aber bezahlen. Die kannst Du hier auch hochladen, in XXL. Wenn es sein muss, muss ich eben die Bauzeichnungen ekzeptieren. Aber Dresden ist auch sehr groß und man kommt ohne viele Kategorien ab 15 Dateien kaum aus.

Bitte schreibe, ob es ok ist, dass die Dateien in einer anderen Kategorie sind oder sonstwas. Wenn nicht, mache ich das wieder rückgängig. Ich würde die in einer Kategorie Blueprints of Buildings before 1945 lieber sehen. Die Außenansichten, mit Skizze wären aber ok. Oder Parks von oben. Manches ist aber nie gebaut worden? Es ist ja ein Gebäude, wenn es als Gebäude zu erkennen ist. Eine Bauzeichnung ist kein Gebäude, wenn ein Gebäude nicht darauf zu erkennen ist. Diese hier, sind grobe Bauzeichnungen, ohne viel dran.

--SamsonBVB (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin SamsonBVB. Danke für deine konstruktive Rückmeldung. Ich muss ja zugeben, dass ich dich verstehe (und eine ähnliche Antwort schon erwartet hatte). Lass uns überlegen, was die beste Lösung ist (evtl. möchten Alte Meister wie Z oder sk noch etwas dazu sagen). Ziele sind m. E.:

Kategorie mit hübschen Bildern alter Gebäude zum Durchklicken
Übersichtlicher Steinbruch für die Neuanlage von Artikeln – auch versteckte Bilder zu einem Gebäude finden
Dazugehörig: Sichere Einordnung unter der Kategorie „Dresden“

Von daher mein Vorschlag: Eine Kategorie „Floor plans of demolished buildings in Dresden“ unter der bereits vorhanden Kategorie und unter „Demolished buildings in Dresden“. Einverstanden? --Derbrauni (talk) 07:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Derbrauni: Ja. Eigentlich müsste man sogar eine Kategorie erschaffen, wo steht, dass es zerstörte Gebäude waren und keine abgerissenen. Wer reißt das ab? Niemand. Oder das ehemalige Dresden vor 1945 in Gebäudeesembles. Zumidnest geht es darum, dass eben Bauzeichnungen oder Formeln nicht mit Fassadenkategorien vermischt sind, damit die Leute in der Welt das schneller einsehen können. SamsonBVB (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Derbrauni: Also aus meiner Sicht ist die Kategorie keine Diashow. Sondern einfach knallhart eine Sammelschachtel, in die alles reinkommt, was da sinnvoll reingehört. Für eine schöne Bildershow kann man sich ja dann im Artikelnamensraum eine Bildergalerie basteln wie bei Frauenkirche (Dresden). Maximal kann man in der Kategorie mit dem Sortierschlüssel z.B. Z wie Zeichnung die "Bauzeichnungen" ganz nach hinten schieben. Was ist mit Bauzeichnungen genau gemeint? Die Zimmergrundrisse einer Etage, finde ich besonders spannend bei Gebäuden. Alternativ die Unterkategorie c:Category:Floor plans of buildings in Dresden um die oben genannte erweitern. Hoffe ich hab die Diskussion ansonsten richtig verstanden. Wie gesagt nach persönlichem Befindlichkeiten geht es in den Categorien einfach nicht. -- sk (talk) 18:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Ja, aber ab 15 Bildern über ein Thema, macht man eigentlich eine eigene Kategorie. An sich werde ich eine Kategorie machen, von Häuersn aus der Belle Epoque in Dresden, die zerstört wurden, kann man eine eigene machen. Außerdem hat hier SK gesagt, dass hier die Leute eigentlich keinen Blog haben, wegen der DIashow. Die Diashow ist aber in einer Kategorie ein Maßstab, dass alle Leute sich das ansehen und nicht aber jede Türklinke 20 mal gezeichnet und gemalt gezeigt wurde oder Bauzeichnungen, die sehr einfach dargestellt sind, dominieren. SamsonBVB (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wo hast du die Zahl 15 her? Ich denke nur mit Graus an die c:Category:Fashion of Dresden. Jedes von dir hochgeladene Foto, das eine bekleidete Person zeigt, kommt da rein. IMHO ist das sinnfrei. Aber das liegt halt immer im Auge des Betrachters. Warum hast du dort keine Unterkategorien für Frauen- oder Kindermode etc. angelegt? Dort sind nahezu 500 Bilder drin. --sk (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Die anderen Leute haben doch auch die Fashion- Kategorie erschaffen. Da beschwerst du dich aber nicht. Und du hast studiert?? Da mach doch die Kategorien selber dazu!! Das ist doch kein Blog. ABer talentiert bist du nicht. Aber studiert haben. SamsonBVB (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte sachlich bleiben. - Welche andere Fashion-Kategorie meinst du genau? Was hat das mit meinem Studium zu tun. Ich hab null Ahnung von Mode. Vielleicht schreibst du einfach oben in die Kategorie mal rein, welche Mode-Bilder da genau reinkommen und welche nicht. Damit das alle Nutzer wissen. - Aber zurück zu Gebäuden. Du magst keine Baupläne in der Category:Demolished buildings in Dresden. Dann leg dort eine Unterkategorie für die Baupläne an, wie oben vorgeschlagen. Aber bitte nicht einfach aus den Bildern die Kategorien entfernen wie bei diesem Bild. Du kannst dir ja mal das Werkzeug Cat-a-lot anschauen. Damit geht es sehr schnell Bilder zu verschieben. --sk (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Du bist jetzt wichtig??? Du hast null Ahnung. Ich habe dich nichts gefragt. Deine Propaganda brauchst du nicht mehr machen aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen. SamsonBVB (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo zusammen. Warum so aggressiv, SamsonBVB? Ich denke, @Stefan Kühn: 's Kritik war durchaus sachlich (387 angezogene Menschen in einer Kategorie „Mode“ sind zumindest fragwürdig). Aber er sagte ja schon selbst, dass das nicht seine Baustelle ist. Meine auch nicht, also zurück zum eigentlichen Thema und der Verbesserung von Commons. Was spricht gegen eine neue Kategorie „Floor plans of demolished buildings in Dresden“. Die dann unter „demolished buildings“ und unter „floorplans“ hängt. Wegen mir mit den Unterkategorien „Floor plans of demolished belle epoque buildings in Dresden“. Das macht das einsortieren nicht einfacher, aber so oft werden solche Pläne ja auch nicht hochgeladen. Ich persönlich mag es auch lieber aufgeräumt mit weniger Bildern pro Kategorie.

Der Gedanke mit den demolished/destroyed ist gut, habe ich noch nicht drüber nachgedacht. Mir fehlt aber auch die Fantasie, wie man aus diesem Dilemma rauskommen will. Ein Kategoriezweig „vor 1945“ wird sofort problematisch, wenn das Gebäude noch steht. Was ich bei einem alten Mietshaus ja im Zweifelsfall garnicht weiß. Auch andere Städte (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Demolished_buildings_in_Cologne Beispiel Köln) scheinen keinen Unterschied zwischen abgerissen und kriegszerstört zu machen (was wäre mit nach dem Krieg abgerissenen Ruinen?). Also lassen wir die Kirche im Dorf, „demolished“ ist aussagekräftig genug.

SamsonBVB, magst du dich um die Umsetzung kümmern? Sei es mit oder ohne Baustil-Unterkategorie?

@Derbrauni: Mann muss sich mal in die Kinder reinversetzen. Die verstehen dann, dass das Gebäude abgerissen wurde. Es wurde aber zerstört. Da lassen wir es beim Abriss. Denn: Ein Abriss erfolgt bei einem Gebäude, wenn es starke Beschädigungen durch Abnutzung oder Witterungseinflüsse oder sogar Bombardierungen oder Feuer ausgesetzt war und so einfach nicht mehr rekonstruierbar wäre. Dann lassen wir das Thema Zerstörung und Abriss. Da aber bei 1945 die Gemäuser teils noch standen und die Gemäuer der Keller auch abgerissen wurden, lassen wir es bei "Demolished buildings of Dresden". In Dresden sind diese Gebäude aber abgerissen worden und durch schlechtere Gebäude ersetzt, was bei Abrissarbeiten nicht der Fall war; im alten Dresden. Da hatte man abgerissen, um was Schöneres zu haben.

Wikimedia Commons schreibt vor, dass man bei ca. 15 Bildern über einen Bereich, Thema oder Ort..., eine Kategorie machen darf. Aber man darf keine Kategorie machen, wenn es dazu nur ein paar Bilder gibt. Also 1 oder 2. Das wären dann zuviele Kategorien, die alle immer angeklickt werden müssten. Daher habe ich die schönen Aufnahmen der abgerissenen Gebäude hier in diese Demolished buildings of Dresden gesetzt. Natürlich könnte man etliche, andere Kategorien bei den Bildern noch addieren, wobei man aber nicht dazu käme als Einzelperson, diese neuen, anderen zu entdecken Fotos und hochzuladen. Die ganzen Elemente eines Hauses kann man auch noch kategorisieren. Das schafft man allein aber nicht, wenn man im Privatleben noch andere Sachen zutun hat.

Wir lassen es bei "Demolished Buildings of Dresden".

Wir machen dann das auch so mit "Floor plans of demolished buildings of Dresden". Daraus aber die Zeichnungen der Fassaden aber bitte in beide Kategorien: "Demolished buildings of Dresden". Da kann man es mit dem Auge schneller finden.

Wir müssten aber beim Anfang mit einer groben Kategorie anfangen: Technische Zeichnungen und dann Bauzeichnungen von Dresden (Line drawings of buildings in Dresden)

Technical drawings of Dresden (Umfasst alle Baukonstruktionszeichnungen von der Logik)

Line drawings of buildings in Dresden

Line drawings of demolished buildings in Dresden

Bei den abgerissenen Gebäuden der Stadt Dresden, kann man noch eine KAtegorie machen: Demolished buildings of Dresden built during the Belle Epoque. Belle Epoque ist ein anerkannter Epochenbegriff und meint auch : Schöne Epoche.

SamsonBVB (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich fange da mal damit an. Ich werde es dann morgen oder so mit ping zeigen. Wenn die Kategorien nicht passen, dann kann man sie auch noch umleiten. SamsonBVB (talk) 22:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Derbrauni: Category:Line drawings of buildings in Dresden Category:Line drawings of demolished monuments in Dresden

Category:Line drawings of demolished buildings in Dresden SamsonBVB (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Was Du hier sagst zum Stefan Kün ist aber nicht real. Das ist ziemlich wirr. Und meine Darstellungen hier sind nicht aggressiv. SamsonBVB (talk) 01:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SVG Check online free link checker - scalable vector grafics bug black boxes text veraltet software[edit]

https://svgcheck.toolforge.org/index.php --SamsonBVB (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vicealmirante infantería de armada Argentina (bandera).svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vicealmirante infantería de armada Argentina (bandera).svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vicealmirante infantería de armada Argentina (bandera).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok , solved |Permission={{PD-Art|PD-AR-Gov}}--SamsonBVB (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PNG Kompressor Compressor Verkleinerung Verkleinerer Kleiner machen[edit]

https://compresspng.com/ --SamsonBVB (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JPG zu PNG Hintergrund entfernen Background[edit]

https://www.apowersoft.de/remove-background-online --SamsonBVB (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gute Scans in SVG umwandeln kostenlos aller paar Tage gute Qualität[edit]

https://www.vectorizer.io/ --SamsonBVB (talk) 18:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera para mejorar[edit]

Hola, SamsonBVB. Será posible mejorar esta bandera: File:Bandera de la Gendarmeria Argentina.svg? Gracias desde ya. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.231.218.23 (talk) 22:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Si. Solo tengo que subir rápidamente otras cosas aquí desde Argentina. Ya lo había notado. Confirmo que me llamó la atención y ya estaba en la lista para mejorarlo. No hay problema. También tengo que hacer las otras cosas. De momento tengo que subir los parches de todo el ejército argentino como PNG. --SamsonBVB (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terminado.¡Tome! File:Insignia de gendarmería laurel argentino.svg --SamsonBVB (talk) 20:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias! --186.139.151.3 04:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Theater (Dresden)[edit]

Hallo SamsonBVB, ich muss mal fragen, was es mit der Category:American Theater (Dresden) auf sich hat. Ich sehe da kein Theater. Einige Bilder sind von Category:Flora Hegner. Hat sie an dem Theater gearbeitet? Und die Kinder-Bilder? Die meisten Bilder sind auch in der Category:Postcards with photographs of persons by Edgar Schmidt. Kannst du mir das mal erklären. Ich vermute einen Copy-Past-Fehler von dir und würde die Kategorie einfach leeren und löschen. Aber vorher wollte ich dich dazu fragen. Beste Grüße -- sk (talk) 04:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Sehr geehrter Herr Kühn. Das heißt erst einmal -bitte erklären-. Das American Theater gab es und die hatten Schauspieler. Die hatten eine Bühne, Maskenbildner, Kostüme und Bühnenbilder und Bühnenkulissen auf der Marschallstraße (Marschall König Johann - So eine Art Generalissimo vom Deutschland). Dort war der Edgar Schmidt mit drin im Haus und das liegt auf der Hand, dass es doch so war, dass der Schauspieler auch fotografierte, für Autogramme oder Andenken. Weil es die Stars waren und geschätzt wurden. Es gehörte zum Anstand, dass man in den Kontakt trat. Das darf man nicht mit heute alles gleichsetzen. Er hat die Bühnenbilder genutzt, um Fotos zu machen und so. Warum soll er denn nicht mit dem American Theater gearbeitet haben? Beide konnten doch profitieren. Das waren doch keine Dummen oder Kaputten. USA- Leute haben in Dresden Fotos gemacht und Studios dafür oder Dresdner für US Amerikaner. Flora Hegner wird nicht nur im Zentraltheater gearbeitet haben, weil es keine Logik ergibt und Schauspieler immer mehrere Theater haben als Arbeitgeber und sie hier als junge Frau fotografiert wurde. Daher habe ich aber trotzdem nie eine Kategorie erstellt. Die Kategorie Category:American Theater (Dresden) habe ich nie erstellt. Also. Der Edgar Schmidt hatte vom Theater hier die Bühnenkulissen genutzt; für seine Fotos. https://www.stadtwikidd.de/wiki/Marschallstra%C3%9Fe Meine spanischen Texte wurden massiv rausgelöscht und in deutsch geschrieben. Die hätte man aber in spanisch und deutsch stehen lassen können. Die Nutzer denken, dass man nur in deutsch beschreiben darf. Von mir aus kann gelöscht werden, solange es nicht diese wertvollen Fotos betrifft. Formell kann ich nicht beweisen, aber man kann sich in die Leute reinversetzen. Wie, sage ich aber nicht. SamsonBVB (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo SamsonBVB, zu erst noch das "bitte". Das ist mir beim ersten Text in der Eile durchgerutscht. Gehört sich aber. Danke für den Hinweis. - Das American Theater war laut Stadtwiki in Nr.18. Der Verlag von Category:Verlag Edgar Schmidt war in Hausnummer 12-14 untergebracht (laut Text in der Category). Ich hab dem Verlag jetzt auch mal die Category:Marschallstraße (Dresden) verpasst. - Aber alle die anderen Infos von dir sind ohne Beleg. Ja es kann so gewesen sein, aber es ist nicht nachweisbar, also eher Vermutungen. Deshalb würde ich vorschlagen die Category:American Theater (Dresden) zu leeren und zu löschen. @32X: Was sagst du dazu? - Das jemand deine spanischen Texten löscht ist nicht schön. Hast du da ein Beispiel-Bild? Da kann man ja schauen wer das genau war. Aber ich persönlich finde, bei den Bildern zu Dresden wäre es viel praktischer wenn der Dateiname auf in deutscher Sprache wäre, denn es sind sicherlich mehr Deutsche Nutzer als Spanier, die sich an der Geschichte Dresdens interessieren. In den Beschreibungstexten kann dann ja alles beides drin stehen. -- sk (talk) 04:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: Wikimedia sperrt mir die Zugangsrechte auf den Server. Ich kann auch nicht einmal die Seiten oder Daten abrufen zum lesen. Seit wann darf ich nicht in Spanisch Überschriften schreiben? Wo steht denn das auf Wikipedia?--SamsonBVB (talk) 22:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was meinst du mit "Zugangsrechten auf den Server"? Sehe da nichts auf auffälliges. Eine Sperre von dir gibt es aktuell nicht. Vielleicht ist dein Internet gerade etwas ruckelig. - Das mit dem Spanisch ist eine persönliches Empfindung meinerseits. Ich kann kein Spanisch und die Mehrzahl der Dresdner auch nicht. Wenn du aber Bilder von Dresden mit spanischen Dateinamen hochlädst, dann hat die Dresdner Community mehr Arbeitsaufwand diese Bilder richtig einzusortieren, weil man erstmal mit einen Übersetzungsseite konsultieren muss. Da du aber auch super Deutsch schreibst, wäre es gegenüber der Dresdner Wikipedia Community sehr aufmerksam, die Bilddateien auch mit deutschen Dateinamen hochzuladen. Abhalten von dein Tun kann dich aber erstmal keiner, weil es dazu keine Regel gibt. --sk (talk) 04:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido[edit]

SamsonBVB, primeramente quiero felicitarte por los escudos que has cargado. En especial, me gustaron mucho las provincias que se consiguieron esa categoría con Juan Domingo Perón y que por ende adoptaron símbolos similares al de su partido (Provincia Eva Perón y Provincia Presiden Perón). Eran difíciles de conseguir en buena calidad. Te escribía por si era posible hacer una versión svg del escudo de la Provincia de Misiones en esa época: este. Creo que los elementos del escudo de la provincia Presidente Perón podrían ser útiles. Desde ya, muchas gracias, y repito mis felicitaciones por lo hasta ahora hecho. Un saludo. --186.139.151.3 20:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@186.139.151.3: #Como puede ver, mi objetivo es crear todos los escudos de armas de muy buena calidad. He subido casi todos los parches de la fuerza Aerea y luego es el turno del ejército. Cuando termine, solo crearé archivos SVG. Desafortunadamente, los argentinos tienen poco dinero y mucho trabajo para crear eso. Por eso estoy haciendo esto.

Planeo crear el escudo de armas de la gendarmería en SVG y luego los otros escudos de armas de las provincias. Tengo que decirte que estoy aprendiendo esto de forma autodidacta. Pero nunca soy el artista de los escudos, sino el restaurador. Es un honor para mí crear este escudo de armas con el propósito de restaurarlo.--SamsonBVB (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias como siempre. --186.139.151.3 03:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

De nada. --SamsonBVB (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:China Space Station Mission Shenzhou 12 Logo.png[edit]

File:China Space Station Mission Shenzhou 12 Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historical Logo SG Dynamo Dresden (1968-90).png[edit]

Hi! Warum hast Du das denn zurückgesetzt? Das hat doch gepasst, auch zeitlich gepasst, siehe hier auf den Fahnen und da auf dem Wimpel? Liebe Grüße, Doc Taxon (talk) 22:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weil das ein Original ist und das andere Logo ja schon als SVG hochgeladen worden ist. SamsonBVB (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logo vom HFO[edit]

Danke für das Erstellen des Logos. Ist es vielleicht möglich, eine Version in Schwarzweiß zu ergänzen (gelb -> weiß, grün -> schwarz, außerhalb des Kreises alles schwarz)? Viele Grüße, Schnurrikowski (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--- Machen Sie was Sie wollen. Mann kann auch einen extra Upload machen. Sie meinten das Halbleiterwerk Frankfurt Oder?--SamsonBVB (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Es lebe das alles erobernde Banner des Leninismus!" Plakat.jpg[edit]

File:"Es lebe das alles erobernde Banner des Leninismus!" Plakat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Do not fall under PD-RU-exempt

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Alex Spade (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ehrenbanner Dynamo Sowjetunion.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder mit KI einfärben[edit]

Hallo SamsonBVB, das Bild File:Főpályaudvar a Bayrische Strasse felől. Fortepan 18171.jpg hab ich auf die Originalversion zurückgesetzt. Ich bitte dich keine Originale mit solchen eingefärbten Bildern zu überschreiben. Mir gefallen die farbigen Bilder ja auch, aber die Farben sind halt nicht echt. Soll heißen, der Computer-Algorithmus nimmt an, dass die Farbe der Bildelemente so sein könnte, weil er ähnliche Bilder so kennt. Es sind aber eben nur Annahmen beruhend auf Wahrscheinlichkeiten. Lies vielleicht mal Künstliches neuronales Netz dazu. Auf jeden Fall sind es nicht die echten Farben und deshalb bitte einfach das Bild unter einem neuen Dateinamen hochladen und sauber kennzeichen. Am Besten Category:Digitally manipulated photographs setzen, was besseres hab ich noch nicht gefunden. So vermeiden wir das irgendwann in der Zukunft jemand das "eingefärbte" Bild für das Original hält. Besten Dank. --sk (talk) 07:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Extinción de incendios con aviones Schmilka 7 2022 o.JPG, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

A.Savin 20:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this kind of "file descriptions" are not accepted, as Commons is not your private weblog. Please edit the descriptions of your recent uploads and add a brief, descriptive caption instead of walls of text with conspiracy theories. Thanks. --A.Savin 20:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Since you have threatened to report the user to CIA, I blocked your account for an indefinite duration. We may consider an unblock if you fully retract the threat. Ymblanter (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I will withdraw User A Savin's report to the CIA. Also, it was never the intention to destroy him or damage his CV negatively or make him unemployed.

At the end I also asked for precise information about passages in the text that I should change. Even after the law and had been waiting for it. Also, I had not previously received a block or warning or temporary ban. I'm not a CIA employee. I also said that I actually allow all changes to the text here. I just wanted to know where I got the law for this, because you can add extra short descriptions under the media. I also wanted to know what should finally be done with the lyrics. My account was not created to bother other users, but to show things that are otherwise forgotten and are important for an identity. Credits were always accurate and images were almost always under free license. The main goal for me is uploading and not insulting, threatening or especially rushing or political manipulation in the background. I only want to use this account. I don't use bots either.

Nor do I have any interest in installing networks with other users on Wikimedia Commons in order to take action against other users or to intimidate or prevent them from making contributions.

I will change the text to a short form text.SamsonBVB (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Decline reason: "This is not adequate. COM:BP asks an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither is on offer here. "I will withdraw User A Savin's report to the CIA"--which one assumes was intended to mean "withdraw [the threat of making] User A Savin's report to the CIA"--does not acknowledge that the comment was unacceptable, why it was unacceptable, or that it or comments like it will not be repeated. You have, in fact, been warned about harassment before and if it is genuinely your contention that a warning was necessary to understand this is not acceptable, you may wish to consider what that may imply about your judgment and ability to contribute. Эlcobbola _talk 15:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Das wird aber nun wirtschaftlich unbegrenzte Konsequenzen haben. Ich habe gegen keine Regeln verstoßen und mann nennt nur welche, aber der Hergang mit Sachverhalt fehlt, wie immer schon. Diese alte Masche. Auch ist der wahre Grund ein unideales Psychogramm bei Russen und Amerikanern. Außerdem kann ich ja selber von der CIA sein und daher ist es keine Grund mich zu sperren. Ich habe niemanden hier belästigt! Eine Belästigung ist in Deutschland eine Straftat. Auch im Internet. Ich darf auch nicht schreiben, dass jemand primitiv sei oder so. In einer Diskussionseite mit einem Link nur mit einem lieben Hund als Spam (werbung) bestraft zu werden ist echt die Härte. Auch ist die Thematik und Region wie immer unideal. Freie Meinung eben, kann man auch nicht bei Wikimedia verbieten.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rudolf-Harbig-Stadion&oldid=860149610 Hier ist eine Umleitung geschehen und kein Löschen, wie behauptet, da das Stadion mit demselben Namen auch in mehreren anderen Städten existiert und ich den Zunahmen Dresden noch hinzufügte. SamsonBVB (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Auch andere "Mängel" meiner Arbeit waren nur Jammmern und Nörgeln aus Neid für die Belohnung, um als schlechte Arbeitskraft ohne TAlent bevorzugt zu werden mit auch oft Familie. Die Behauptungen hier gegen mich werde ich von der Polizei prüfen lassen.SamsonBVB (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ kurdî ∙ la .lojban. ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Yann (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Heimat-Tiergarten Saßnitz Logo 1985.svg

Yours sincerely, --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verfälschte Fotos[edit]

Hallo, SamsonBVB ich habe bemerkt, dass Du im Jahr 2021 mehrere meiner Fotos gegen schlechtere ausgetauscht hast. Insbesondere die Bearbeitungsbemerkungen, dass die Fotos mit einer minderwertigen Digitalkamera aufgenommen seien, entbehren jeder Grundlage. Solche Belehrungen verbitte ich mir! Ein Blick in die Exif-Dateien hätte genügt, um zu erkennen, dass ich mit einer hochwertigen Digitalspiegelreflex arbeite. Es ist eine Unverschämtheit, hochauflösende Fotos in realistischer Qualität mit dilettantischer Software auf fragwürdige Minderqualität downzugraden, nur weil Dir die Originalfarben nicht passen. Deine massenweise unsinnigen und nichtssagenden Radwegfotos sagen ja genug, dass Du von Fotografie null Ahnung hast. Die Sperrung ist absolut gerechtfertigt. VSchagow (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Bandera.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Bandera.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Bandera.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 15:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Logo.svg[edit]

File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.hmc.mil.ar/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Fma12 (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Aeronaval de caza y ataque parche FAA.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aeronaval de caza y ataque parche FAA.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Aeronaval de caza y ataque parche FAA.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Escuela Federal de Suboficiales y Agentes en Argentina (escudo).svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escuela Federal de Suboficiales y Agentes en Argentina (escudo).svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escuela Federal de Suboficiales y Agentes en Argentina (escudo).svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Policía federal Argentina superintendencia de drogas peligrosas.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Policía federal Argentina superintendencia de drogas peligrosas.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Policía federal Argentina superintendencia de drogas peligrosas.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Fma12.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Escuela de Suboficiales de Gendarmería Nacional de Argentina escudo.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escuela de Suboficiales de Gendarmería Nacional de Argentina escudo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escuela de Suboficiales de Gendarmería Nacional de Argentina escudo.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Escuela Superior Gendarmeria Argentina Logo.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escuela Superior Gendarmeria Argentina Logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Fma12 (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo H Grl 602 Logo.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo H Grl 602 Logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo H Grl 602 Logo.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 01:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Río Negro Escudo 1969 - 2009.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Río Negro Escudo 1969 - 2009.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Río Negro Escudo 1969 - 2009.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Fma12.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Aviación Naval Fokker F-28 1979-2016 ARA parche.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aviación Naval Fokker F-28 1979-2016 ARA parche.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Aviación Naval Fokker F-28 1979-2016 ARA parche.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 10:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Comando Conjunto de Ciberdefensa EM Argentina escudo.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Comando Conjunto de Ciberdefensa EM Argentina escudo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Comando Conjunto de Ciberdefensa EM Argentina escudo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Instituto de Inteligencia de las Fuerzas Armadas Argentina escudo.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Instituto de Inteligencia de las Fuerzas Armadas Argentina escudo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Instituto de Inteligencia de las Fuerzas Armadas Argentina escudo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA simple.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA simple.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA simple.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 10:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bandera mando división de tanques de Argentina.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bandera mando división de tanques de Argentina.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera mando división de tanques de Argentina.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bandera directora de la colegio militar de la nación (Argentina).svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bandera directora de la colegio militar de la nación (Argentina).svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera directora de la colegio militar de la nación (Argentina).svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Fma12.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:G5C V Brigada FAA.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:G5C V Brigada FAA.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:G5C V Brigada FAA.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Fma12.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:APBT Buzos Tácticos ARA parche.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:APBT Buzos Tácticos ARA parche.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:APBT Buzos Tácticos ARA parche.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 00:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Orden del Libertador San Martin condecoración.png

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen von Dateien ohne Grund mit sinnloser, einfacher Entfernung von Quellenangaben und Berechtigungen Dritter[edit]

Erst kommen Nutzer an und entfernen als einfache Editoren die Quellenangaben, die in der Historie nachzuverfolgen sind und nicht von Administratoren geprüft werden. Dann kommen die an und meinen, dass ich meine Quellen und Berechtigungen nicht eingetragen habe (Masche von CIA Leuten im Ausland, um al Dumm dargestellt zu werden). Alte Masche. Wegen meiner Herkunft und Ausrichtung sei ich zu dumm hier was hochzuladen. So kommen die immer an. Wikimedia habe ich das geschrieben und haben das zwar bekämpft und wieder vergessen. AUch die Fakekontos von angeblichen Argentiniern. DIe USA Trolls geben sich hier als typische Deutsche, Polen, Russen und Argentinier aus. Englisch zu lernen war ein sehr großer Fehler. Da hätte man doch lieber Spanisch lernen müssen. Aber die Schule zwingt das ja den Kindern auf. --178.5.121.112 22:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Und ich werde weiter dafür sorgen, dass weniger Englisch in der Welt gesprochen wird. --178.5.121.112 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg[edit]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg[edit]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 08:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:SamsonBVB

File:Logo Borussia Dortmund 1976 - 1978.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Canalettoweg Pirna - Elbradweg (36054097370).jpg[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Postcards[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas Pirna simple.png[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas de Pirna simple.svg[edit]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Category:Transgender_and_transsexual_women_of_Dresden[edit]

File:Escudo completo de ciudad Pirna (dibujo).svg[edit]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg[edit]

File:Escudo de armas de Pirna 1245.svg[edit]

Saxonian arms[edit]

File:Emblem of the Border Troops of East Germany.svg[edit]

File:Deutsches Jungvolk Bannfahne 177 Pirna.svg[edit]

File:Deutsches JungVolk FanfarenTuch Pirna.svg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Demolished buildings in Dresden[edit]

SVG Check online free link checker - scalable vector grafics bug black boxes text veraltet software[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vicealmirante infantería de armada Argentina (bandera).svg[edit]

PNG Kompressor Compressor Verkleinerung Verkleinerer Kleiner machen[edit]

JPG zu PNG Hintergrund entfernen Background[edit]

Gute Scans in SVG umwandeln kostenlos aller paar Tage gute Qualität[edit]

Bandera para mejorar[edit]

American Theater (Dresden)[edit]

Pedido[edit]

File:China Space Station Mission Shenzhou 12 Logo.png[edit]

File:Historical Logo SG Dynamo Dresden (1968-90).png[edit]

Logo vom HFO[edit]

File:"Es lebe das alles erobernde Banner des Leninismus!" Plakat.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bilder mit KI einfärben[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

August 2022[edit]

Blocked[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Verfälschte Fotos[edit]

File tagging File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Bandera.svg[edit]

File:Hospital Militar Central Argentina Logo.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Aeronaval de caza y ataque parche FAA.png[edit]

File tagging File:Escuela Federal de Suboficiales y Agentes en Argentina (escudo).svg[edit]

File tagging File:Policía federal Argentina superintendencia de drogas peligrosas.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Escuela de Suboficiales de Gendarmería Nacional de Argentina escudo.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Escuela Superior Gendarmeria Argentina Logo.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo H Grl 602 Logo.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Río Negro Escudo 1969 - 2009.png[edit]

File tagging File:Aviación Naval Fokker F-28 1979-2016 ARA parche.png[edit]

File tagging File:Comando Conjunto de Ciberdefensa EM Argentina escudo.png[edit]

File tagging File:Instituto de Inteligencia de las Fuerzas Armadas Argentina escudo.png[edit]

File tagging File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA simple.png[edit]

File tagging File:Escudo de la ESGCFFAA.png[edit]

File tagging File:Bandera mando división de tanques de Argentina.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Bandera directora de la colegio militar de la nación (Argentina).svg[edit]

File tagging File:G5C V Brigada FAA.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg[edit]

File tagging File:Bandera mando para el grupo tanques Argentina.svg[edit]

File tagging File:APBT Buzos Tácticos ARA parche.png[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Löschen von Dateien ohne Grund mit sinnloser, einfacher Entfernung von Quellenangaben und Berechtigungen Dritter[edit]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg[edit]

File:Akademie-Verlag-Berlin Logo mit Sans Serif.svg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search