User talk:OTFW/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by kwjbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Kwj2772) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Kwj2772 14:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by kwjbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Kwj2772) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Kwj2772 14:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Image deletion warning Image:Gedenktafel_Bonner_Str_2_Helene_Jacobs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

axәl (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, OTFW!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


Dank und Hinweis

Hallo OTFW, Deine Galerie Berliner Gedenktafeln ist wunderbar, ich werde sie alle mal durchsehen. Erstaunlich was man alles nicht kennt. Ein Hinweis: am Kudamm gibt es eine Tafel für Robert Musil, siehe http://www.berlin.de/ba-charlottenburg-wilmersdorf/bezirk/gedenktafeln/musil.html - die scheint mir noch zu fehlen. Für den nächsten Ausflug... Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Cholo Aleman, vielen Dank für die netten Worte. Ich habe mich sehr gefreut, dass Du Spaß an meinen Bildern hast. Ich wünsche Dir viel Spaß beim durchstöbern und danke Dir für den Hinweis auf Robert Musil. Solltest Du Fragen haben zu den Bildern versuch ich sie gerne zu beantworten.

Grüße --OTFW (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe Deine Antwort mal hierher verschoben, um es nicht auseinanderzureißen. - Eine Frage noch wegen der möglichst systematischen Erfassungen dieser Sachen: es gibt m.W. eine Reihe von Gedenktafeln z.B. für frühere Synagogen (am Kreuzberger Ufer z.B.) - hast Du die erfasst? Es gibt dazu Literatur der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung und auch in den 80Jahren schon einen Band über NS-Denkmäler und -Tafel in Berlin (vom Berliner Senat denke ich.) ((Kennst du vermutlich alles besser als ich.)) Für München (wo ich gerade lebe) gibt es übrigens noch nichtmal die Commons-Kategorie: "Plaques in Munich" fehlt noch. Werde ich bei Gelegenheit mal anlegen. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC) (siehe : Category:Plaques by city)

Denkmale in Berlin

Hallo OTFW, wie ich sehe, interessierst Du Dich für Berliner Gedenktafeln. Schöne Bilder, übrigens! Vielleicht fällt das ja auch in Dein Interessenbereich: In Category:Denkmal hat jemand, der das Kategoriesystem offensichtlich nicht verstanden hat, Denkmale aus Berlin gesammelt. Die Bilder sind nicht unbedingt schön und zudem durch Datumseinblendungen verunstaltet, können aber vielleicht doch sinnvoll eingeordnet werden. Kannst Du da helfen? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 09:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Gedenkstatur_Adenauerplatz_(Charl)_Konrad_Adenauer.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel_Saarower_Weg_51_(Wilhh)_Clara_Müller-Jahnke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel_Markt_19_(Weimar)_Martin_Walser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.57.68.76 17:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Bildbeschreibung

Hallo OTFW, schau mal bitte meine Änderungen an - mir scheint, du lädst mit Commonist oder so hoch und müsstest mal deinen Hochladetext aktualisieren. Die "ImageUpload"-Vorlage gibt es nicht mehr (und hatte auch nie eine Funktion). Das "own" sollte in geschweifte Klammern - oder meinst du nicht "Own work"? Noch besser wäre in Bezug auf Gedenktafeltfotos übrigens {{Self-photographed}}. Und: bei Fotos von Gedenktafeln füge bitte den FOP-Baustein hinzu, damit klar ist, wieso das Foto erlaubt ist (wegen Panoramafreiheit). Achja, und die Koordinatenangabe reicht doch einmal (die obere), oder nicht? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 12:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

People killed at the Berlin Wall

Hi,

I've noticed you create new categories from names of people killed at the Berlin Wall. It is good to categorize images, but if you create new categories you must also add them to existing categories!

The best existing category is: Category:People killed at the Berlin Wall

Just add the following text without spaces between the double brackets [ and ] to the description of each new category:


[ [ Category:People killed at the Berlin Wall ] ]


It will add them automatically, and users will have a chance to see your images =)

I have fixed 2 categories already. Cheers!

84.97.149.42 04:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

vielleicht interessant für dich

gruß --Z thomas 20:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

respekt, du hast ja heut einen gewaltigen fotorundumschlag hingelegt! mir sind damals nur die drei stolperstein vor die füße gekommen. gruß --Z thomas 18:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Paul Conrad

Hallo OTFW, wäre die Gedenktafel in der Gedenkhalle der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche für Paul Conrad (Theologe) auch etwas für dich? Gruß Dmicha (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW, ich bin gerade über dieses Foto gestolpert. Ist diese Tafel außen am Hotel oder innen vor der zugehörigen Suite angebracht? Wenn letzteres, fällt die Tafel nicht unter die Panoramafreiheit. Da der Text darauf urheberrechtlich geschützt ist, müsste das Bild gelöscht werden. Bevor ich da aber entsprechende Schritte einleite, würde ich deine Antwort abwarten. Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 20:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Ebenfalls: File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Hotel Elephant 4.jpg usw. Wo sind die angebracht? Außem am Hotel hab ich kürzlich nichts gesehen, ich denke, das müsste innen sein. Dann sind das aber alles Urheberrechtsverletzungen. Dito die Gästebucheinträge, soweit sie die nötige Schöpfungshöhe erreichen, was aber m. E. nur bei dem von Murray und dem von Grass der Fall ist. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Al Murray.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Al Murray.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Günter Grass.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Günter Grass.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gedenktafel Samariterplatz (Friedh) Friedliche Revolution3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 10:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gedenktafel Samariterplatz (Friedh) Friedliche Revolution2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 09:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel Onkel-Bräsig-Str 138 (Britz) Heinrich Vogeler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Skulptur Stadtpark Steglitz (Stegl) Erwachsenes Mädchen Julius Limburg 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 09:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW, wenn du Fotos von urheberrechtlich geschützten Werken hochlädst, die letztlich nur unter Panoramafreiheit erlaubt sind, musst du die Vorlage {{FoP-Germany}}, sofern in Deutschland stehend, einfügen und den Künstler nennen (gesetzlich vorgeschrieben). --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW,

diese beiden Dateien scheinen auf den ersten und auch auf den zweiten und dritten Blick identisch zu sein. Die Software weist sie nicht als byteidentisch aus, also scheint irgendwo ein winziger Unterschied zu bestehen, der aber m. E. dennoch nicht dazu führt, dass es sich um zwei wirklich unterschiedliche Bilder handelt.

Gibt es einen Grund dafür, dass du dasselbe Bild zweimal hochgeladen hast? Kann nicht eine der beiden Dateien gelöscht werden? Vielleicht die mit dem Schreibfehler im Namen ("Schutz" statt "Schulz")? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Ja da hast Du recht. Die "Schutze-Boysen" ist mir doppelt untergekommen. Sie kann gelöscht werden. Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. OTFW (talk) 09:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
OK, ich habe die Dublette gelöscht. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Buddy Bears in Berlin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Dingley (talk) 12:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Neue Steine

Huhu OTFW, ich hatte den Hinweis schon mal irgendwo als Editkommentar gebracht, aber das war wohl zu unauffällig. Deshalb nochmal hier: Es wär super, wenn du neue Fotos von Stolpersteinen nicht über die alten drüberladen würdest. Ganz besonders gilt das für Fotos von neu verlegten Steinen (weil da nämlich in der Wikipedia immer, und zwar im Beschreibungstext in den Tabellen, Fotos der alten Steine nochmal separat verlinkt werden, damit der Leser schauen kann, was sich verändert hat, und das geht natürlich am besten, wenn die einen anderen Dateinamen haben). Dank & Gruß, PDD (talk) 13:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich hab dir die drei Traubs aus der Gleditschstraße nochmal unter anderen Namen hochgeladen, ist also schon erledigt. Bester Gruß, PDD (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, ich erneuere den Hinweis nochmal, da du bei File:Stolperstein Manfred-von-Richthofen-Str 221 (Templ) Helmut Klotz.jpg und File:Stolperstein Burgherrenstr 4 (Templ) Erich Kuttner.jpg schon wieder neuverlegte Steine mit anderem Text über die dort vorher liegenden Steine geladen hast. PDD (talk) 13:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Und dasselbe bei File:Stolperstein Ruhlebener Str 155 (Willst) Käthe Goldstein.jpg und File:Stolperstein Ruhlebener Str 155 (Willst) Gertrud Goldstein.jpg. Beide Bilder waren in unserer Liste der Stolpersteine in Berlin-Wilhelmstadt mit der Beschriftung (Foto des alten Stolpersteins) verlinkt... mit anderen Worten, durch dein Drüberladen hast du einen vorher korrekten Artikel in der Wikipedia in einen falschen verwandelt (weil da ja kein Foto des alten Steins mehr ist). Das sollte sich doch wirklich vermeiden lassen? PDD (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC) PS: Keine Sorge, ich reparier das gleich, aber für die Zukunft wärs schon schön, wenn mans nicht immer reparieren müsste...

PS: Es ist schon wieder passiert! Habs repariert, die zwei unterschiedlichen Steine haben jetzt unterschiedliche Namen. PDD (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Danke - Thanks

Besten Dank für die umfangreichen Umkategorisierungen, das habscg vergessen oder ... Wiege sagt: "Jedenfalls besten Dank". --Paul - eine Silbersonne (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW, von welchem Bildhauer ist diese Büste und wo steht sie, Innenraum oder öffentlicher Außenraum? --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Britische Streitkräfte in Deutschland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel Bethlehemkirchplatz (Mitte) Bethlehemkirchplatz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 07:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW! Zu dieser von Dir hochgeladenen Gedenktafel habe ich im Forum eine Frage gestellt. Wäre schon, wenn Du Dir das mal anschauen könntest. Weisst Du noch, wer der Gedenktafel-Aufsteller ist? Gunnex (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel Metzer Str ggü118 (Saarbrücken) Neue Bremm Die Häftlinge3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Tegel

Hallo OTFW, wer ist der Bildhauer und erfüllt dein Standort beim Fotografieren die Bedingungen der dt. Panoramafreiheit?

--Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Bildhauer hätte ich fast vergessen, habe ich aber gerade nachgeholt. Panoramafreiheit denke ich ist gegeben: Öffentlich zugänglicher Raum im Flughafen (Abflughalle). OTFW (talk) 06:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi OTFW, Danke. Aber bzgl. Geltung leider nein, siehe de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium_„öffentlich“. In D. sind Innenräume leider ausgeschlossen. Wenn der Künstler noch lebt, könnte sich eine direkte Anfrage bei ihm lohnen. Damit war ich auch gelegentlich erfolgreich. --Túrelio (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm afraid I shall have to remove File:Gedenktafel Ebertstr ggü 25 (Tierg) Maueropfer.JPG and File:Wandbild Leipziger Str 7 (Mitte) Aufbau der Republik.jpg as they were uploaded before the challenge began, which is against the rules. I hope you can take more images for future challenges. -- Colin (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Verschiebungen und Löschungen

Hallo OTFW, du bist gerade heftig beim Verschieben von Kategorien in Berlin. Dabei ist mir jetzt mehrfach aufgefallen, dass du Kategorieseiten löschen lässt, obwohl sie unter anderem in den deutschen Artikeln als Commonscat verlinkt sind. Du produzierst damit tote Links. Bitte lass das bleiben und lege entweder eine Kategorie-Weiterleitung an oder eine Begriffsklärung. Außerdem passe bitte in anderen Projekten die Links an. Immer vorausgesetzt, dass deine Kategorieverschiebung überhaupt notwendig ist, da habe ich nämlich auch meine Zweifel. de:Reichpietschufer liegt z. B. in Tiergarten und Kreuzberg, du hast alles nach Reichpietschufer (Berlin-Tiergarten) verschoben. Wo ist überhaupt festgelegt, dass der Ortsteilname immer im Lemma sein muss? --Sitacuisses (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Siehe dazu auch Commons:Eine Kategorie umbenennen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 06:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry habe ich nicht gewusst. Reichpietschufer ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Wollte die Straßennamen einheitlich gestallten, so dass die Ortsteilnamen im Straßennamen enthalten sind. OTFW (talk) 06:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Kannst Du mir noch einen Tipp geben, wie ich feststellen kann, ob die Kategorieseiten in den deutschen Artikeln als Commonscat verlinkt sind? OTFW (talk) 06:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Zunächst stellen sich andere Fragen: Ist die Verschiebung überhaupt notwendig? Sollte sie nicht besser von Benutzern mit der Berechtigung zum Verschieben durchgeführt werden, die Seiten ähnlich verschieben können wie Artikel in der de.wp? Wenn du die Richtlinienseite gelesen hast, weißt du, dass verschobene Kategorien nur in absoluten Ausnahmefällen gelöscht werden sollten. Verlinkungen der Kategorien aus anderen Projekten: Zunächst schaust du in de.wp, ob es einen Artikel zu der Straße gibt. Dort suchst du nach einem Commons-Link (steht normalerweise unter Weblinks) und nach Links zu andersprachigen Artikeln. In denen kannst du ebenfalls die Links anpassen. Außerdem müssen auf auf Wikidata der oder die Commons-Links angepasst werden. Und weil das alles extra Aufwand bedeutet, sollten Verschiebungen nur durchgeführt werden, wenn sie einen echten Vorteil bringen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 08:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
O.k. Danke. OTFW (talk) 12:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Nur als Anmerkung: Ich finde die Veschiebung auf eine einheitliche Namensgebung sehr sinnvoll und mache es ebenfalls entsprechend, wenn ich darüber stolpere. In Berlin muss zur Disambiguation teilweise bis auf Ortsteile heruntergebrochen werden. Zum einen, da Straßennamen häufig mehrfach vorkommen (es gibt u.a. acht Kastanienalleen in insgesamt neun Ortsteilen und neun Bahnhofstraßen in zehn Ortsteilen). Zum anderen verhindert das, dass z.B. Gebäude an Straßen indirekt unterhalb von falschen Ortsteilen landen. Zur Zeit besitzen geschätzt 90% der Berliner Straßenkategorien einen Namen der Form "Straßenname (Berlin-Ortsteil)". Die Einheitlichkeit ist äußerst nützlich, da es sie einem erlaubt, den passenden Kategoriennamen "blind" zu erraten, z.B. bei der Kategorisierung, bei der Verlinkung oder beim Aufruf. Jedesmal, wenn der Name nicht dem Schema entspricht, muss ich teilweise ein oder zwei Minuten suchen, bis ich die passende Kategorie gefunden und sichergestellt habe, dass es auch die korrekte Kategorie ist.
Aber natürlich sollte sichergestellt sein, dass die Verlinkungen von anderen Seiten nach wie vor auf die richtige Kategorie zeigen, etwas, was ich zugegebenermaßen auch oft vergesse. Zum Verschieben kann ich empfehlen, einen Antrag auf Commons:Requests for rights auf das filemover-Recht zu stellen. Sehr nützlich. --Sebari (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Fürs Einrichten von Begriffsklärungen gibt es auf Commons übrigens keine Richtlinien, wie es trotzdem gehen kann und häufig gehandhabt wird habe ich eben bei Category:Müllerstraße (Berlin) umgesetzt. --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Bei Straßen, die in Berlin mehrere Bezirke durchlaufen, ansonsten aber eindeutige Namen haben wie Reichstagufer ist keine Begriffsklärung notwendig, sondern Category:Reichstagufer kann schlicht als Überkategorie der Bezirks-Teilkategorien stehen bleiben und muss auch nicht gelöscht werden. --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo OTFW, steht diese Büste wirklich im Freien bzw. wo genau hast du gestanden als du das Foto aufgenommen hast? Und wer ist der Bildhauer? --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Wird noch geklärt OTFW (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Sächsischer Hof

OTFW, bitte nach einer solchen Änderung die Kategorie auch anlegen. Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd, den Verweis gab es schon hier, außerdem könnte man auch Wikipedia:Verlinken#Links auf noch nicht existierende Artikel schauen. Gruß OTFW (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Commons hat andere Regeln als Wikipedia. Außerdem legt man in WP soweit ich weiß auch keine leeren Kategorien an. Und überhaupt, was spricht dagegen Category:Sächsischer Hof (Weimar) einfach passend zu kategorisieren? Ein Text ist gar nicht nötig. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Manfred Bluth

Hallo OTFW, Frau Bluth hat in Wikipedia ein Foto des Grabsteins von Herrn Bluth entdeckt und war sehr erfreut. Sie würde gern mit Ihnen in Kontakt treten. Sie selbst hat kein Internet. Ich würde gern Ihre Kontaktdaten weiterleiten. MfG. vpahlke

Bin leider nur auf diesem Wege zu erreichen, oder siehe linken Rand, "E-Mail an diesen Benutzer". MFG OTFW (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Fotos in Senftenberg

Hallo OTFW, du hast diese plastik in senftenberg fotografiert. dir ist nicht rein zufällig auch eine paar meter entfernte geschützte roteiche [1] vor die linse geraten... :-) die chance ist gering, aber manchmal weiß man ja nicht. viele grüße --Z thomas 14:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Tut mir leid, kann ich leider nicht weiterhelfen. Viele Grüße OTFW (talk) 08:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Gedenktafel Van 't Hoff

Gedenktafel Van 't Hoff in Berlin

Dear OTFW, Your photograph of the plaque in honour of Van 't Hoff in Berlin is used in the book Nobel op de kaart (van Calmthout/Reumer) (p.158), with due ref. to Wikimedia Commons in the photo credits. Vysotsky (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your information. OTFW (talk) 14:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Gedenktafel Schloss Liebenberg (Liebenberg) Libertas Kapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

ehrengräber

Hallo OTFW, ich hab die de:Liste der Ehrengräber in Berlin erstellt und einige deiner Fotos dafür genutzt. hast du vielleicht noch ein paar weitere "rumliegen" oder hab ich noch ein paar ehrengräber übersehen? übrigens manche Ehrengräber fehlen, weil sie ihren Status verloren haben. viele grüße --Z thomas 15:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Leider habe ich keine Fotos mehr rumliegen, aber sicherlich bekommen wir die Seite noch voll. Viele Grüße OTFW (talk) 08:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Grabstätte Trakehner Allee 1 (Westend) Franz Cassirer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

axel (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Grabstätte Trakehner Allee 1 (Westend) Hedwig Cassirer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

axel (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Grabstätte Trakehner Allee 1 (Westend) Hans Maria Wingler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

axel (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Grabstätte Trakehner Allee 1 (Westend) Hedwig Cassirer2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

axel (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Grabstätte Trakehner Allee 1 (Westend) Franz Cassirer2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

axel (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Stolperstein de:Albert Kayser

Hallo, ich suche den Stolperstein in der Groninger Straße 22 un kann ihn nicht finden. Kannst du dich noch erinnern, wo genau du ihn fotografiert hast? LG Queryzo (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Queryzo (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Queryzo,
tut mir leid, ich wüsste nicht mehr, dass der Stein an einen anderen Platz gelegen hat. Ich wünsche Dir viel Erfolg und sonnige Tage OTFW (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Kategorieumbenennungen

Hallo OTFW, ich wollte dir nur für deine unermüdlichen Kategorieumbenennungen danken. Ich mache das zwar auch ab und zu, wenn ich über eine noch nicht umbenannte Kategorie stolpere, aber deine Geduld wünsche ich mir. :) --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Srittau, ja ich staune manchmal auch, aber wir müssen doch mal fertig werden. Hast Du vielleicht eine Idee, was wir mit den alten nicht mehr vorhandenen Straßen machen können. So irgendwie in eine Kategorie "history streets" oder so ähnlich?? Freue mich über Ideen! Grüße OTFW (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
"Former streets in ..." klingt für mich wie ein sinnvoller Name. Ich würde es dann als Unterkategorie der entsprechenden "Streets in ..." anlegen. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo, was soll eigentlich der Sinn sein von so etwas? Alt-Marzahn liegt ausschließlich in Marzahn. Diese Zeitverschwendung muss nicht sein, es gibt hier sinnvollere Aufgaben abzuarbeiten. --A.Savin 16:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Gemäß deiner sehr aufschlussreichen Antwort habe ich's jetzt zurückverschoben. --A.Savin 14:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Selber Hallo, ich dachte Du wolltest sinnvolle Aufgaben abarbeiten, statt dessen gibst Du Dich mit mir ab? Da ja jeder weiß, das "Alt-Marzahn" in "Berlin-Marzahn" liegt, wie die "Marzahner Straße" logischerweise in "Alt-Hohenschönhausen" liegt, kannst Du meine Umbenennung so lassen oder auch nicht, aber wahrscheinlich "leider unvorstellbar in der deutschen Wikipedia, der autorenfeindlichsten und trollfreundlichsten Sprachenwikipedia ever." (Zitat:A.Savin ). Ich jedenfalls versuche es nochmal, damit wir einheitliche Kategorien haben. In diesem Sinne OTFW (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Also noch einmal: was soll der Sinn dieser Umbenennungen sein? Kannst du mir den Mehrwert dieser offensichtlichen Tautologie namens "Alt-Marzahn (Berlin-Marzahn)" erläutern? Und was sollen diese aus dem Kontext gerissenen Zitate? Was hat das alles überhaupt mit der deutscen Wikipedia zu tun? Langsam wird's zu blöd hier... --A.Savin 15:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Blöd finde ich es schon länger.... Der Sinn soll sein, dass zu jeder Straße der richtige Ortsteil angegeben wird, so dass man erkennt, welche Straße zu welchem Ortsteil gehört. Ich weiss nicht warum Du dass so unnütz findest, die Strassen in ein einheitliches Bild zu bringen? OTFW (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.