User talk:Bep

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy[edit]

Hei Bep. Malen du bruker på bildene dine kan bli problematisk om disse retningslinjene blir vedtatt. Det kan derfor være fint om du deltar i diskusjonen. Hilsen Kjetil r 02:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Denne diskusjonen er ikkje særleg viktig for meg. Eg forutset derimot at dei set i gang ein robot for å rydde opp i historikken, ei ukritisk sletting av bilete vil vere katastrofal. --Bep (talk) 01:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Ja, dette vil eventuelt bli gjort via robot hvis noen ønsker å gjøre om på malen din. Dette fører på ingen måte til sletting av bilder. --Kjetil_r 02:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NielsF ? (en, nl, fr, it) 23:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wikibar-alpha-8bit.png[edit]

Please tag your images[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 01:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Khimaz.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Khimaz.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I did not upload this picture. --Bep (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Bep!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Alfred nobel statue oslo.jpg[edit]

Hei, denne er det vel Gustav Vigeland som står bak, så da må den slettes. Vi får gjenopprette 1. januar 2014! ;-) Mvh.


User:Bep/license[edit]

Hi Bep, hope you don't mind that I formatted your above template. I wasn't quite sure about how to add {{information}}, but I think it would be helpful to use that one. -- User:Docu at 11:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

This template predates {{information}}, and was created at a time where image description pages had no structure at all. I can't really see how we can add {{information}} to it without breaking it. On the other hand, I notice that Bep doesn't use User:Bep/license for his latest uploads, so perhaps it is time to supersede it? I suggest that we change it to just "© 2005, 2006, 2007 by Bjørn Erik Pedersen" and use it in the "author" field of {{information}}, and use separate license tags. Regards, --Kjetil_r 12:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Something like this version should do, but as his template only mentions ©, I'd prefer that he converts it himself.
I think there is also a bot that can substitute the template on the images afterwards (this would complete migrating "user:bep/license" to {{information}}). -- User:Docu at 14:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
No, that won't do, as {{information}} often is used in combination with User:Bep/license. See this example, we don't want two information templates on the same image page. I think a deprecation of User:Bep/license must be done by hand to catch all the ways it is used. --Kjetil_r 14:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
You just made that one ;). There seems to be some overlap [1], so yes, it needs some work. -- User:Docu at 16:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
I will look into it... I started to use commonist for my uploads some time ago, so I stopped using the templates. --Bep (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Monolith_2_200804.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monolith_2_200804.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 12:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Monolith_1_200804.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monolith_1_200804.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 12:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Bep,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Skreddergården[edit]

Hei! Veldig fine bilder du har tatt av Skreddergården i Akersgata! Jeg hadde tenkt å lage egen kategori for dem, men ble litt usikker da jeg så at du har lagt dem i kategorien for arkitekt Henrik Nissen. I siste Oslo byleksikon side 41 står det at Christian Reuter var arkitekten, det samme står det i artikkelen vår og hos SNL Har du noen opplysninger om Nissen du kan vise til eller er det feil? Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Ser ut til at det er Reuter. Har opprettet kategori. ;-) Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hei, fint du ordner opp. Jeg mener jeg fant arkitekten på en nowiki-artikkel... Men kan ha sett feil. --Bep (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Bep,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Grandiosa pizza.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grandiosa pizza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Bep,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Bep,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Please add sources[edit]

Hi Bep: A while ago you uploaded great photos of the Opera house, however, quite a few of them are missing "source and author"... Could you take a look at this page] start at "Opera" and fix the images for source and author? Thank you so much! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

I will, eventually. They are all mine, so author and source is me. --Bep (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vatnasete i Sogndalsdalen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vatnasete i Sogndalsdalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sogndal helsesenter 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sogndal helsesenter 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Minnestein Hans Paludan Smith Schreuder.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnestein Hans Paludan Smith Schreuder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sau på Hylsete i Sogndal-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sau på Hylsete i Sogndal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eirik Bakke, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eirik Bakke, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ole Amund Sveen scora 2-2-målet mot Bodø-Glimt 24. juli 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ole Amund Sveen scora 2-2-målet mot Bodø-Glimt 24. juli 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boats in Port Vell in Barcelona.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats in Port Vell in Barcelona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nokkanes fyrlykt - Leikanger 2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nokkanes fyrlykt - Leikanger 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nokkanes Leikanger 2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nokkanes Leikanger 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carvings in north wall portal, Urnes Stave Church-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carvings in north wall portal, Urnes Stave Church-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Urnes Stave Church from north.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urnes Stave Church from north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dale kirke i Luster, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dale kirke i Luster, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skjolden bensinstasjon, original bensinpumpe 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjolden bensinstasjon, original bensinpumpe 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skjolden bensinstasjon, 2016, 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjolden bensinstasjon, 2016, 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hopperstad stavkirke, 2016-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopperstad stavkirke, 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baldersteinen, 2016 - 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baldersteinen, 2016 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hove kirke, inngang, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hove kirke, inngang, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hove kirke, 2016-7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hove kirke, 2016-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nes kirke, 2016-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nes kirke, 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leikanger kirke, 2016-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leikanger kirke, 2016-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torre Agbar Barcelona 2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Agbar Barcelona 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Scofield-lovano.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scofield-lovano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul's Cathedral, London, 2016-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Henrik Krohn 1826-1879, gravstein i Sogndal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henrik Krohn 1826-1879, gravstein i Sogndal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lonon Eye at sunrise.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lonon Eye at sunrise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Elisabeth Tower at sunrise, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elisabeth Tower at sunrise, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London Eye, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Eye, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Big Ben at sunrise, 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Ben at sunrise, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sognefjorden sett frå Loftesnes, 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sognefjorden sett frå Loftesnes, 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kvammetunet, Sogn Folkemuseum-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvammetunet, Sogn Folkemuseum-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lerum syltetøyfabrikk i Sogndal, 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lerum syltetøyfabrikk i Sogndal, 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sognefjorden sett frå Skjersnes.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sognefjorden sett frå Skjersnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

A roof of a building at the Grand Palace, Bangkok, sunrise, 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A roof of a building at the Grand Palace, Bangkok, sunrise, 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skilt, taxi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skilt, taxi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Picea abies shoot with buds, Sogndal, Norway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Picea abies shoot with buds, Sogndal, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Espen Næss Lund, Sogndal-Rosenborg 07-15-2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espen Næss Lund, Sogndal-Rosenborg 07-15-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017[edit]

Vinnarbiletet

Hei! Biletet ditt av Fjærland kyrkje vann fyrsteplassen i Wiki Loves Monuments i Noreg i 2017! Gratulerer! Det har naturlegvis difor òg gått vidare til den internasjonale finalen i Wiki Loves Monuments, som eitt av dei ti beste bileta frå Noreg. Takk for bidraget! Astrid Carlsen tek kontakt om premien snart! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 12:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Jippi! --Bep (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Hennes & Mauritz-butikk i Norge.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hennes & Mauritz-butikk i Norge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

W3ird N3rd (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)