User talk:Chongkian

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chongkian!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 01:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Chongkian,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop changing "zh-hant" to "zh"[edit]

Because Chinese can be devided into two version, tradtional and simplified, they should not be used at the same time or in the same template.If you want to type in simplified version, please use the template "{{zh-hans}}". In traditonal version , plaese use the template "{{zh-hant}}". --祥龍 (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Wrong category[edit]

Hello Chongkian, I saw you added a Wiki Loves Monuments category to files. This category should only be used when photos are uploaded in September 2015 and take part in the contest. And they must contain the Wiki Loves Monuments template and not just the category. But the photos should be added to this Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Malaysia. So I moved them there. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Southern Bank (04-MLK/24) and Peranakan Museum (04-MLK/25) as mentioned in the WLM Malaysia list DO EXIST in Malacca![edit]

Hi Chongkian,

Thanks for your message but your statement is INCORRECT, just because you were unable to find it doesn't mean that it does not exist :)

Both Places (Southern Bank (04-MLK/24) and Peranakan Museum (04-MLK/25) as mentioned in the WLM Malaysia list DO EXIST in Malacca.

For this time, I will give you the direction and guide you to the point so that you can reach there easily but for other locations please do a bit of more search as comments like these may discourage others and this is the first time Malaysia is Participating so I hope you agree and keep the comments positive/suportive and appreciate the hard word done for WLM Malaysia  :)


Pasted below are the directions:


For (Southern Bank (04-MLK/24)

This is at the Jalan Bendahara Malacca. Just about 200 m after youu pass city Bayview hotel and renaissance hotel you will see Mercedes Car Centre on the left before the Southern Bank Building. Southern Bank Building is just after the Mercedes Car Showroom, on your left. This is a one way road. I hope now you will find it easily :)


For Peranakan Museum (04-MLK/25)

This is at Jalan tun tan cheng lock. If you go straight along the southern bank road. ( keep right) till u enter the red building of dutch you will end to a small roundabout At the roundabout take right turn and you will cross small bridge at Malacca river. On the bridge you will see Hard Rock cafe on the right. Please take left turn and then you will be on the road "Jalan tun tan cheng lock" "Peranakan Museum" is there and I hope now you will find it easily :)

Please spread the word about WLM Malaysia in your friends and social media circles.

Have a great WLM Malaysia! Thanks. Ammarah Khalid (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Shopping malls in Sabah / Shopping in Sabah[edit]

Good evening, Chongkian. Thanks for reviewing the Sabah categories. However, I want to mention, that "Shopping in Sabah" and "Shopping malls in Sabah" are two different lines of category. While the first is referring to an activity, the second is referring to the building. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I get your point in that. But the broader 'parent' category that exists regarding shopping is towards the "Shopping malls in Malaysia", with its 'children' category dividing in into each state and federal territory in Malaysia. Therefore I created the "Shopping malls in Sabah". Although I agree that shoppings and shopping malls are two different things, I haven't seen the parent category for "Shopping in Sabah" in which it should be "Shopping in Malaysia", as well as its other related categories (e.g. Shopping in Penang, Pahang, Perlis etc), thus making the "Shopping in Sabah" category to be a less well-established category. We can, at this point of time, try to categorize shopping malls in Sabah into "Shopping in Sabah" and "Shopping malls in Sabah" together, but you must do the part for making the "Shopping in Malaysia" as well as its other 'children' category for "Shopping in Penang", "Shopping in Perak", "Shopping in Kedah" etc as well. I'm just trying to make Wikimedia Commons for Malaysia to be equally made for every state, with the same depth and same parallel name of coverage. Not just for one particular state being too deep, while the others are being left out. I'm trying to review the Malaysia category as a whole. Chongkian (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I am well aware, that Sabah is predominant with the amount of images, as I am the main contributor of photos. The other states at this moment do not offer enough images to make a parallel structure necessary. This is not only a matter in Malaysia, but also in other countries, whereas not every category tree can be populated with enough images. I think, it is not really a problem, when Sabah has categories, that are not available for the other states. More important it is, to sort the images in appropriate categories, that do not leave pools with unrelated photos of high level categories. I will establish the overcat Shopping in Malaysia, but not parallel categories for the other states. Cheers and thanks again for working at the MY categories, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
By the way, if you are based in Malaysia or Singapore, maybe you would like to join the Singapore Wikimedian Meetup 8. We are still planning though and getting enough people. This is the Facebook group link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/sgwikimeetup or the wiki link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore_8 Chongkian (talk) 01:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately not. I am a German, based in Cologne, Germany and I am coming one or two times per year to Sabah and Malaysia to pursuit my photo documentary project. The time in between, I try to catch up with postprocessing, but it is a a sisyphean undertaking; I have still tens of thousands photos of the region unprocessed. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

File:SSCC.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SSCC.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

RIP photo ~ T_T Chongkian (talk) 07:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Blanking categories[edit]

Hello, thanks for your edits. Please don't blank categories, if you wish for them to be deleted, tag them with {{speedy}} or {{delete}}. Cheers :) Riley Huntley (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for the info. Yeah, my intention to blank the category of some Common pages previously so that they would be deleted (due to name changes, name convention standardization, regrouping to other categories etc). Btw, thanks again for the info! Chongkian (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Chongkian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Gama Tower.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gama Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Canopus Grandiflora 03:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Kuningan City.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kuningan City.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Canopus Grandiflora 03:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Bank Caotun[edit]

Look at these categories, please:

None of them is working now. Fix it, please. Wieralee (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Done. Chongkian (talk) 09:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Not yet. You can't redirect to redirection: each redirection should lead to the working category. Wieralee (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Taipei City[edit]

The same here:

Bad work, I'm afraid :( Wieralee (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I Understand. I've been trying to standardize the name writing convention, to be: "New Taipei City Library, Banqiao Branch" (before this got Banqiao Branch New Taipei City Library, New Taipei City Library Banqiao Branch, or Banqiao Library etc) .. so i try to standardize every name to be: main entity first, followed by comma, then the branch name (unless there is official full name in English) in their website or outside the building name. Of course there has been some redirections for this various names. I'm gonna fix this now. Chongkian (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Done. Chongkian (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Please be a little bit more sensitive, Chongkian[edit]

If you remove a location category, don't do it without replacing it with another suitable category.

see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3APadang-Mat-Sirat_Langkawi_A-local-cow-01.jpg&type=revision&diff=248451667&oldid=183923719

--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Artha Graha Building.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Artha Graha Building.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--HyperGaruda (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Artha Graha Building.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Artha Graha Building.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sealle (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)