User talk:Henxter

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Henxter!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 14:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Henxter!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Florent de Ligne.jpg was uncategorized on 20 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Albert Henri prince de Ligne.jpg was uncategorized on 1 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Georges de Baillet Latour.jpg was uncategorized on 13 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Henxter, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Jan de Lichte D'Haese 02.JPG

File:Jan de Lichte D'Haese 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.244.109.14 15:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Jan de Lichte D'Haese 01.JPG

File:Jan de Lichte D'Haese 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.244.109.14 15:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Goed bezig

Dag. Het is zeldzaam dat er iemand zo snel productief wordt, het categorie systeem goed begrijpt en goed zijn weg vindt in Brussel. Bedankt. Misschien toch alle Brusselse straten in "streets in Brussels" laten omdat weinig of geen mensen de grenzen kennen van het Brusselse lappendeken (of een "Streets in Brussels by name" aanmaken). Zie Category talk:Belgium. Ik hoop dat je erbij bent wanneer er een nieuwe ronde van Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Belgium & Luxembourg losbarst. --Foroa (talk) 09:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Henxter, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Henxter, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you

Thanks for this edit! As a Czech wikipedian living in Brussels (not speaking Dutch or French), I have to say that these contributions make my day! I take a lot of pictures around pretty much everywhere... so I am happy to see as many languages around as possible. --Aktron (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Own work by original uploader

Hello. Please take care to remove this template when uploading images which weren't created by the original uploader at the local project. I believe the tool gives instructions to that effect. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Henxter⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Henxter,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium 2014 needing check

Hallo Henxter, Ik zie dat je een aantal keer de Category:Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium 2014 needing check weggehaald hebt. Waarom haal je deze categorie weg en waarop heb je gecontroleerd? Romaine (talk) 22:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• Is het verder goed gecategorizeerd, met name: staat het in de meest specifieke categorie(ën), zo mogelijk een categorie specifiek voor het object, en is het monument-ID wel juist. Als je liever hebt dat ik daar mee wacht tot de campagne afgesloten is, doe ik wel voort met 2012 en 2013. Henxter (talk) 08:13, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Ik was vooral benieuwd waarop er gecheckt is. Je noemt twee belangrijke dingen, ben ik erg blij mee. Een derde aspect bij het checken is te kijken of het monument op de foto in de lijst al een foto heeft, en zo niet dat die dan wordt toegevoegd. Dank voor de kwaliteitscheck! Romaine (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

File:La bibliothèque - Pierre Willy De Muylder.jpg

Bonjour, J'ai pensé que c'était la source de la photo qui était demandée et non celle du tableau. Comme cette photo est reprise dans un site, je mettrai le lien vers le site. Cela convient-il ? Cordialement, Trelam

Même si la source est ainsi clarifiée, je crains que l'image ne soit pas acceptable sur Commons: seulement des images libres y sont acceptées. Pour la reproduction d'une image 2-dimensionnelle, cela entre dans le domaine public dans les 70 ans après le décès de l'artiste. L'alternative est que l'artiste donne lui-même son autorisation explicite. Or, s'il est mort depuis janvier 2013 (d'après l'article sur le wiki français) je crains qu'il ne puisse donner cette autorisation. bàv Henxter (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Jozef_De_Beenhouwer&oldid=147808823&diff=prev

Hi, Henxter, thank you for your edit. Do I take it right, there is the 'Belgian sort order' and the 'Netherlands sort order' to be respected on commons? Lotje (talk) 13:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Heads-up

Hi, as an active colleague on upload projects, I thought I'd drop you a personal heads-up for my request for adminship, today being the last day for views. RFA's tend to only have a small proportion of the community taking part, so it can be difficult to judge if this is representative. --Fæ (talk) 13:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Categorieën

Hallo Henxter,
Als vraag bij het artikel hier bovenaan ( Orden uw bestanden... )  : Wat is er mis met het vermelden als categorie óók de stad waar het object, monument enz. zich bevindt (daar begin ik meestal met zoeken). Is dat overcategorisatie ? De ettelijke teksten over het onderwerp categorieën - waar u wel uw weg zult in vinden, maar ik niet - bewijzen volgens mij dat Wiki. het zichzelf ingewikkeld maakt. Wat zou kunnen helpen voor de gebruiker : meer grafische voorstellingen (die met de bollen en pijlen) maar met echte voorbeelden en/of namen van categorieën erbij. Ik ging er van uit : beter eentje meer dan eentje minder - met des te meer kans om gevonden te worden. Categorieën zijn ten slotte door Wikipedia en Wikimedia Commons ter beschikking gesteld van de gebruikers van dit medium. Slechts één categorie overhouden vind ik maar verarmend.
Met vriendelijke groeten, Hubert DENIES (talk) 19:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

V.Putin in photo File:Colours to dye cloth.JPG

Hi, in this photo you can finde V.P. in the journal, see note, thx. --Vikoula5 (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Vladimir Putin and Alexis Tsipras 01.jpg

You've an eye for the little details. I've added a tag for Tsipras as well. As there are plenty of photographs of Putin available on Commons, and even the original of this one, it is a bit redundant to place it in a category or subcategory for Putin. Regards, Henxter (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Feliz año! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Feliz Año 2016 ! * * *
		* Feliz Año Nuevor! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! Deseo que este nuevo año venga cargado de bienaventuranza para ti y para los tuyos. Un año nuevo lleno de muchos nuevos retos que yo estoy seguro conseguirás superar. Te he dejado este video, con un mensaje positivo, lleno de esperanza y amor. De mi, un Venezolano que te aprecia. Saludos --The Photographer (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hernoemen van files

Hallo Henxter, deze afbeelding zou ik graag hernoemen. straat lijkt nogal verwarrend. Ik zag dat je de beschrijving reeds vervolledigde. Wanneer je een suggestie hebt hoor ik het graag. Lotje (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Place de Brouckère by night.jpg ? Henxter (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)  Done

FoP

Thanks for all the work! In the past days I have followed the log for the restoring of files. This monitoring I now will end. I have created an overview of all the restored images. This overview can be found at: User:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium. If you restore more images, or if you see someone restoring images because there is now Freedom of Panorama in Belgium, please add the images to this overview or let me know. Thanks!! Romaine (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

PS: On User talk:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium I collected some anomalies, including files of what the actual file is missing... Romaine (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Deze file svp deleten - please delete this file.jpg

Heb je dit bestand per ongeluk opgeladen of wat was de bedoeling? Henxter (Overleg) 09:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Ik heb dit bestand inderdaad per ongeluk opgeladen en het mag van mij verwijderd worden. Dit bestand had ik namelijk reeds eerder geüpload File:Opoeteren, de Sint Donatuskapel oeg72350 foto2 2015-06-10 14.21.jpg en ik kreeg bij de tweede upload geen foutmelding omdat het een iets andere versie betrof; ik heb het maar op deze manier aangegeven. Groeten --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

Hallo Henxter,

In 2014 nam je deel aan de fotowedstrijd Wiki Loves Monuments. In België en Luxemburg wordt deze fotowedstrijd ook in 2016 gehouden. Wees welkom!

• Website van Wiki Loves Monuments in België & Luxemburg
• Website van Wiki Loves Monuments internationaal (andere landen)

We organiseren ook vier fototochten in Gent, Mechelen, Antwerpen en Luik. Zie: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/nl&setlang=nl

We zien graag je foto's van monumenten verschijnen. Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, please see my counterproposal here, do you agree? --FocalPoint (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

That makes a long filename, but it contains less ambiguity. Go ahead. Look also for the other two files in the same category. Henxter (talk) 07:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Anthony Luzzato Gardner

Category:Anthony Luzzato Gardner has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LIVE NIEUWS (talk • contribs) 08:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Note to self: Category:Anthony Luzzatto Gardner Henxter (talk)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Henxter, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Spelling

Hallo, Henxter, je maakte Category:Één aan, maar gezien Eén meen ik dat het voor de televisiezender beter een Category:Eén wordt. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Blijkbaar is daar al jaren geleden op nlwiki al over gediscussieerd. Ik zal het veranderen maar de redirect houden. bedankt Henxter (talk) 07:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Geen café?

Hoi Henxter,

Ik vroeg me toch af waarom je bij de bestanden Molenstraat 2 en ‎Molenstraat 4 uit Baarle-Hertog de categorie café in Antwerpen hebt verwijderd. Wat ik vorig jaar heb gezien was toch echt een café. Vriendelijke groet, Dqfn13 (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo @Dqfn13: . "Cafés in Antwerp" slaat op cafés in de stad (Groot-)Antwerpen. Baarle-Hertog maakt daar tot nader order geen deel van uit. Ik heb er nu de categorie "Cafés in Belgium" toegevoegd om je tegemoet te komen. Groet, Henxter (talk) 12:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Hoi Henxter, dank. Ik dacht dat die categorie voor de hele provincie gold en niet alleen voor de stad. Bedankt voor het toevoegen van een nieuwe categorie. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Excuseer dat ik zo binnenval, maar met Groot-Antwerpen wordt daarmee Antwerpen (stad) bedoeld? Lotje (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

koppeling File Brussel Hubertusgalerij en File Brussels Royal galeries

Dag Henxter,

Ik begrijp de koppeling niet goed. Het gaat om 2 gelijkende maar verschillende foto's, genomen met een interval van een paar seconden.  File: Brussels Royal Galeries was al geplaatst in juni en kwam daardoor niet meer in aanmerking voor deelname aan de wedstrijd WIKI Loves Public Space 2017 in Belgium. Daarom heb ik de 2de foto geplaatst als File:Brussel Sint Hubertusgalerij. Neemt door deze koppeling mijn foto nu nog deel aan de wedstrijd? Sally V (talk) 00:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo @Sally V: , ik dacht eerst dat ik de foto eerder had gezien, maar toen ik hem terugvond, zag ik toch subtiele verschillen. Ik heb dan de link gelegd om de verwantschap tussen beide te tonen, maar het is wel degelijk een andere foto. (Er is geen exacte policy voor "otherversions": soms is het bijvoorbeeld dezelfde afbeelding onder een andere bestandsformaaat, de andere keer een compleet andere foto, maar van hetzelfde onderwerp.) Je eerste foto opgeladen in juni deed als ik het goed begrijp mee voor een challenge inzake perspectief, de tweede doet mijns inziens probleemloos mee voor voor "loves public space". mvg Henxter (talk) 07:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rob Favier2.jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Favier2.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rob Favier2.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth O (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:VanderGhinste oud bruin.JPG

File:VanderGhinste oud bruin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^☎ 08:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Löschung von Kategorien

Hallo Henxter,

Du hast vor einigen Tagen bei 11 meiner Bilddateien, einen Teil der Kategorisierung gelöscht. Ich hätte gerne den Grund hierfür erfahren, die Löschung ist mir unverständlich. Die Bilder zeigen Gebäudeaufnahmen aus Brügge und waren unter anderem mit "World Heritage Sides ..." kategorisiert, eben diese Kategorie hast Du gelöscht. Das Historische Zentrum von Brügge, in dem sich auch die abgebildeten Gebäude befinden, zählt zum UNESCO-Welterbe, somit meines Erachtens auch die abgebildeten Gebäude.

Ich darf einen kurzen Auszug aus der Veröffentlichung des World Heritage Centers (http://whc.unesco.org/) zu der Stadt Brügge aufführen:

Brief synthesis:

"The Historic Centre of Brugge is an outstanding example of an architectural ensemble, illustrating significant stages in the commercial and cultural fields in medieval Europe." ...

Ich denke, zu einem Ensemble, so wie es hier sehr schön beschrieben ist, gehört jedes einzelne herausragende Teil (Bauwerk); entferne oder verberge ich eines dieser Teile, oder unterschlage ich es bei der Auflistung, (zer)störe ich damit das Ensemble.

Meiner Meinung nach ist es deshalb vollkommen angebracht, bei jedem abgelichteten Bauwerk auf seine Zugehörigkeit zum "gesamten Ensemble" hinzuweisen.

Ich halte die Löschung der zugeordneten Kategorie bei den Fotografien deshalb für absolut falsch.

Deine Meinung hierzu würde mich interessieren.

Mit besten Grüßen

Horst70 (talk) 17:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

You should not categorize images directly in "World Heritage Sites in Belgium". There are subcategories for the different WHIB. Henxter (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Dein letzter Vermerk an mich ...

Hallo Henxter, zu Deinen Einwänden: die ersten beiden Änderungen bzw. "Rückgängigmachungen" kann ich noch nachvollziehen und akzeptieren. Die folgende Änderung meiner Eingaben jedoch, sind für mich vollkommen unverständlich, und ich werde diese nicht akzeptieren. Eine hochgeladene Datei von meiner Kategorie "Photographs by Horst J. Meuter/Belgium" einfach in die Kategorie "Horst J. Meuter" zu verschieben, und damit in eine Kategorie, die mit der hochgeladenen Fotografie nichts zu tun hat und von mir für vollkommen andere Inhalte konzipiert wurde, ohne meine Vorgaben (also die Vorgaben des Autors) zu beachten, halte ich für unverschämt und absolut unakzeptabel. Der Gipfel ist für mich, diesen Schritt mit der Begründung "Unterschied zwischen den Versionen" zu rechtfertigen. Es handelt sich bei den beiden hochgeladenen Fotografien um zwei ähnliche, aber im dargestellten Inhalt eindeutig und vollkommen klar zu unterscheidende Fotoaufnahmen im Wald von Brüssel, die zudem unterschiedlich nummeriert sind. Hier ist es vollkommener Unsinn, einen Unterschied zwischen den Versionen darstellen zu müssen, indem man eine der Fotografien in eine andere Kategorie verschiebt, die vom Autor absolut nicht dazu vorgesehen war. Mein Fazit zu Schluss: Ich denke, wenn so wie Du es tust, das Niveau von WIKI-Commens dargestellt wird, dann sollte man als User ans Aufhören denken! Goodbye, Mister Henxter

horst70 (Dikussion) 19:45 25.08.2018 (UTC)

Categoriseren

Hoi Henxter, doe jij het categoriseren van mijn foto's? Indien ja, laat ik het helemaal aan jou over. Groet Paul Hermans (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Ik moet toegeven dat ik juist categoriseren een leuke bezigheid vind. :) Henxter (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

OK, voor mij een last van mijn schouders :) Paul Hermans (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Mega-size user gallery

Hi Henxter - your user gallery User:Henxter/volglijst 9-9-17 causes serious problems for other users because of its massive size. Please break it up into about 100 smaller galleries. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

It's empty now Henxter (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Florent de Ligne.jpg

File:Florent de Ligne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Henxter,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Henxter,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Henxter,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Bad replacement

Hello! You've replaced a template by a bad description text like in [1]. The template is OK. You should fix the template for using in files, not replaced by a non description text. Please repair all the file descriptions. --XRay ^talk 23:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

BTW: All other templates for heritage monuments can be used for files. IMO it's useful. Why shouldn't only this one not to be used? --XRay ^talk 23:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

BTW 2: The template is easy to fix. Just remove the categorization for files. I just checked it. --XRay ^talk 23:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

BTW 3: Checked again. The template is made for files and categories. So it can be used for files. If you think, files shouldn't be be categorized, change the template. It's better to use this way. I'll revert your changes. If you need help improving the template, just ask. I think I'll can help. --XRay ^talk 04:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

@XRay: , as you suggested earlier, I marked the template in June last year as to be used for categories only. I don't master the programming language, that's why it took so long. It has come now under my attention you changed this only 9 days later back to be used for Files. Please don't do this. Individual files should use the Onroerend erfgoed template, which is the reference for ErfgoedBot. Henxter (talk) 14:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Paul Maeyaert

Beste Henxter, Ondanks mijn verzoeken, en ook Lotje, blijkt deze medewerker toch hardleers, en "dumpt" grote hoeveelheden foto's op commons, zonder daarbij zich aan de richtlijnen te houden, of te reageren bij vragen. Hoe ver laten we deze man zich bedienen van commons, voor zijn eigen publiciteit?--Carolus (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Subdivisions PMR

Dear Henxter, Could you please wait a few months with subdividing PMR in new subcategories? I have been working for more than a year to better categorize and de-duplicate the photos, and have worked through 20,000 files already, but I need a few months more to tackle them all. Your new subdivisions will make it much more difficult for me to fulfil the job, as I use the current categories to trace photos. Vysotsky (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

OK it seemed a good idea at first, but it seems a lot of work. I will place them back (which is a lot less difficult). Henxter (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Dank

Mijn dank voor je uitstekend werk op commons! Groet Paul Hermans (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMissing_image_text.png&oldid=prev&diff=750980543&diffmode=source : can't figure out where that one came from nor what for (???). Thanks for having removed it. Pueblo89 (talk) 15:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gérard - portrait du peintre Redouté - MRBAB inv 1303.jpg

Copyright status: File:Gérard - portrait du peintre Redouté - MRBAB inv 1303.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gérard - portrait du peintre Redouté - MRBAB inv 1303.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)