User talk:Smiley.toerist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

uit de kroeg

English: Welcome to the Commons, Smiley.toerist!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 11:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)




Contents

Deleted contents[edit]

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Smiley.toerist,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

Image:SNCF ticket for 2 trains.JPG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on the Wikimedia Commons: "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how the Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. abf /talk to me/ 12:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:TER_Rhones-Alpes_Oùra.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:TER_Rhones-Alpes_Oùra.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AVRS (talk) 11:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:TER map Nord-Pas-de-Calais.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:TER map Nord-Pas-de-Calais.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– gpvos (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

SNCF maps[edit]

Considering all the trouble with the maps you uploaded, how about taking the maps at rff.fr and making a free licensed copy with Inkscape? Hope I could be of help, ChrisDHDR 19:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Categories in België[edit]

Dag, ik zie dat je geregeld goed werk verricht hier. Dit berichtje om te melden dat in België, het hoofdcategoriesysteem op twee niveaus werkt: Belgisch en plaatselijk (dat laatste kan een wijk, dorp, gemeente of stad zijn). Er is enkel een hierarchie om de relatie tussen land/provincie/municipaliteiten/woonkernen vast te leggen, maar los daarvan is er voor de categorieën in België geen enkele hierarchie en dus ook geen geographische kennis vereist. Als je daarbij bijvoorbeeld een hierarchie van vb de stations in Liège wenst bij te voegen is dat Ok maar het hoofdcategories systeeem België/lokaal blijft beter gehandhaafd. Bedankt en beste groet. --Foroa (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Category for shares[edit]

I moved your query from Commons:Categories_for_discussion to the Commons:Village_pump as it seemed more use there. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Former vicinal railway lines in Belgium[edit]

I will agree with you, if you will proceed on the same way for the above category.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

The cat. "Former vicinal railway lines in Belgium" has pictures from many places and is a subcategory off the much bigger "NMVB/SNCV" category. Once there are enough pictures I can make a subcategory where I can link directly to the location, but until then I maintain the direct link to the location in the pictures. On having enough pics I can create "Former vicinal railway lines in the province of Hainaut" and link it to the province of Hainaut.
The "Parc de Mariemont" category is different in that all the pictures are taken in Morlanwelz-Mariemont.

Greetings,

Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Charleroi tramway 4juni2006.jpg[edit]

Category:Precise location in Belgium wanted

La photo reprépentre le courrefour entre la rue principale " Chaussée de Brŭelles " et " rue de Namuis / rue de la Broucheterre " au lieu dit " La planche " - La limite de Charleroi et Dampreny - Route en direction de Jumet et vers l'aéroport de Gosselies puis vers Brŭelles - Route avec deŭ voies de tram et vers le dépot à Jumet ( voir dans " Discussion " de File:Charleroi tramway 4juni2006.jpg )
Salut --Bernard Piette (talk) 10:30, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

FEVE Valencia 15.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:FEVE Valencia 15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FEVE Valencia 15.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

FCL Railcar[edit]

Tu on peu voir ici et et ici des autres :-) Au revoir --Pil56 (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Railway station Strasbourg.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Railway station Strasbourg.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 15:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Ligne d'Auteuil[edit]

Bonjour,
un grand merci pour les photos d'éléments "Standards", elles permettent d'illustrer enfin (entres autres) l'article de la ligne d'Auteuil dont le développement n'était pas prévu à court terme faute d'illustrations adaptées. C'est maintenant chose faite, on peut éventuellement envisager un bon article pour l'année 2010. Amicalement. Clin Clicsouris (talk) 03:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lyon_Leslys_construction_9.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lyon_Leslys_construction_9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Lyon_Leslys_construction_8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lyon_Leslys_construction_8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Tram_companies_in_Liege_province.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tram_companies_in_Liege_province.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

fr.wikipedia.org: - used on 1 pages [–]
Tramway de Liège

nl.wikipedia.org: - used on 3 pages [–]
Buurtspoorwegen van de provincie Luik
Musée des Transport en Commun du Pays de Liège
Société régionale wallonne du transport

Where used record. Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Wervik_kus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wervik_kus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Brussel_Zuid.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brussel_Zuid.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Schepdaal_spoor_GEN.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schepdaal_spoor_GEN.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Your vicinal railway maps[edit]

Hi, Smiley.toerist. As you've probably noticed, I looked through you contributions and nominated a few files for deletion because they seem to be photographs of non-free works. However, my real concern was your vicinal railway maps, such as File:Buurtspoorwegen Namen.png and File:Buurtspoorwegen Luik.png. It seems clear from looking at the images and their history that you're making these maps by first scanning in a paper map and then cleaning it up digitally. However, I don't see any mention of how you obtained the original paper maps that you scanned. If those images are based on scans of non-free copyrighted maps, then I suspect that they may constitute non-free derivative works. If you could clarify the source of those maps, and thereby allay may concern, I'd be very thankful. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

(Rely below copied from User talk:Ilmari Karonen.)

I used and combined several sources to draw the maps:

  • The starting point is a partial foto of a 1978 GTF national railmap (black and white). This map is no longer available or sold. The vicinal railway lines on the GTF map are very small dotted lines. However there were many errors, imprecisions and corrections for wich I used a lot of (sometimes conflicting) sources. These where:
  • Michelin road maps
  • Vicinal railmaps of "Rail Atlas vicinal"
  • The vicinal story (light Railways in Belgium)
  • Detailed walking maps
  • Google Earth
  • railway timetable of 1933
  • Tram/railway map of Brussel
  • Personal hikes along the tracks (File:Tunnel spoorlijn 25A onder 25 en 27.JPG, File:Essene-Lombeek oude spoorbrug.JPG
  • Discussions with other wikipedians over the precise route of a line.

When I am ready with a map, there is not single byte left of the original picture. All railway lines/vicinal lines have been redrawn with the hand, using the other sources. (thicker and smaller lines, lines and stations deleted and added, etc) I have added a lot of locations and other details. All text is my own.

There is a discussion as what is an original map. Al maps have to start from somewhere and it is inevitable that as a representation of a reality, al maps wil look similar. These are the same railway lines and information. (content) What ultimately makes the difference is the styling en way of presentation, not the content. (Look for example at roadmaps of the same area) Besides there is a lot of original content. Each map cost me a lot off effort and time. The styling and colours are original and my own. A strongly object to refering the maps as derivative works.

Smiley.toerist (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

If you want I can send the "starting" map if you want to judge for yourself.

Thanks for your speedy reply. If indeed, as you write, the styling and colors of the finished maps are entirely original to you, then I see no problem: I fully agree that the mere geographical placement of towns, borders and routes on a map is abstract factual information which generally cannot be copyrighted. I was only concerned because it seemed, from looking at the images, that you might've been merely recreating the source maps complete with their styling, color and other creative presentation choices. If that's not the case, then I have no further concerns. In any case, I'd like to thank you for contributing so much time and effort to Commons, and I'm sorry for any that I may have needlessly wasted with this query. :-) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

It would be usefull is there are some guidelines in the commons. The derivative explaination section doesnt mention maps and what is posible. It remains a judgement call. If you take a picture of a paris metromap and draw a few lines it is not sufficient.

I find the lack of FOP in Belgium and France for public billboards a bit ridiculous. If a company or project puts up public information on the boards, I cant see any posible reason why they want to copyrigth/protect the information. There would be no legal risk. I can extract a drawing out of File:Lyon Leslys construction 9.jpg but it cost a lot of time for little purpose.Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Tram companies in Liege province.jpg is a combination of two different pictures taken in the trammuseum of Liege. It is very usefull information for several articles. I could try to get permission of the museum. Creating a new diagram is a lot off work. Alternatively I could rework the whole thing and keep the information. Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Some of your fotos[edit]

Hi There!

uoupps, a lot of you images have been deleted. I hope you are not turned off by this because some of you images are really great!! I wanted to say, that on some of you images you have choosen a very strong jpeg compression. I would suggest using a less strong compression. That will make the files larger but the quality will be much better! Thanxs for those great old Railways!! Regards --Amada44 (talk) 12:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Lyon Leslys construction 10.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lyon Leslys construction 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Hektor (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

File:TER Rhones-Alpes 2.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TER Rhones-Alpes 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Otourly (talk) 10:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I have restore it, but I have some questions/for this evening. Otourly (talk) 10:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Avond NMVB tram in Henegouwen.jpg[edit]

Dit is de Rue Gustave Boël in La Louvière.

mvg Wiebevl

File:Stoomtram NMVB Trooz.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no affect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Multiple units of Belgium[edit]

Hello, you put a note on that category page, saying "Subcategory:Classical EMU is also a problem." Could you please explain what sort of problem you see? -- Gürbetaler (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

All the pictures in the category are off Belgian multiple units of the SNCB railway. EMU stands for Electric Multiple Unit. "Classical EMU" is a very broad term and can apply to a lot of old EMU's in any country. Not as a subcategory of Category:Electric multiple units of Belgium. Furthermore the other Belgian EMU categorys all start with "SNCB ..." see: Category_talk:Requested_moves#Category:Classical EMU Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I understand. I will propose a name change.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 12:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Suggestie naar aanleiding van Category:Duisburg Sint-Joris-Weert SNCV[edit]

Dag Smiley.toerist. Ik zag je mooie samenvatting van de foto's in de Category:Duisburg Sint-Joris-Weert SNCV. Het op deze manier presenteren lijkt mij ideaal voor een Gallery. Het voordeel is dat je dan geen "ingewikkelde" verwijzingen als [[Category:Duisburg Sint-Joris-Weert SNCV|23]] nodig hebt. Je kunt zelf bepalen in welke volgorde de foto's komen en een groot voordeel is dat wanneer er een nieuwe foto bijkomt, die in een gallery makkelijk op de juiste plaats is te zetten. Bij een category moet je - als je pech hebt - de verwijzingen van veel andere foto's aanpassen om ze weer in de goede volgorde te krijgen. Een ander voordeel van een gallery is dat je snel kunt zien wanneer iemand iets heeft veranderd, wanneer je de gallery hebt aangeduid met "volgen". Bij een category heb je dat niet; als iemand een foto aan de category toevoegd zie je dat niet. Groeten Wouter (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

De "volgende" en "vorige" werken door de verschillende categorien heen. Als je start met File:Sterrebeek-trambaan 1.jpg in categorie Sterrebeek Vossem SNCV komt je uiteindelijk op File:Sint-Joris-Weert Hamme-Mille 1.jpg twee categorien verder. En ik heb nog beelden verderop File:Beauvechain kruising.jpg en zelf nog beelden in Geldenaken die ik nog niet opgeladen hebt. Uiteindelijk denk ik aan een reuze galerij van Sterrebeek tot Bevekom met een kaart erbij.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Dat lijkt me een heel goed idee! Een pagina op wikipedia-NL met een verhaal en een verwijzing naar de "reuze gallerij" maakt het dan compleet. Wouter (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:De Wand schildering.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:De Wand schildering.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Crossborder buses Belgium Netherland[edit]

Isn't there a better name for this category? I'm guessing you're talking about buses that are in some Belgium-Netherlands cross-border region (I live in the US so I have no idea; at first I thought "Crossborder" may be a brand of buses) or buses that simply cross the Belgium-Netherlands border? Maybe we can call it "Belgium-Netherlands cross-border buses" or "Cross-border buses in Belgium and the Netherlands". BTW, this doesn't work. You can only sort a category one way per category. Rocket000 (talk) 06:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

In Europe there are to kinds of international buses in public transport. There are the long distance buses like Eurolines like Paris Amsterdam wich are run for profit. At a local level there are some bus connections crossing the borders. Local and regional buslines are heavily subsidized and local authorities dont like to spend money outside their area. So local international lines are very haphazard and little known. (also in the travelwebsites). Going back to the issue at hand:

How would you classify all the public transport buses lines crossing the US Canadian border? Do local buses al stop at the border and you have to cross on foot to catch a bus on the other side? Often it is complicated because a busline has to have permission on both sides of the border. Who drives the busses? Are local tarif used on both sides of the borders for local passengers? This is why I consider buslines crossing the border as something special. In Europe there are lots of borders without any barriers. By most borders you dont really notice them.

I would like to have head category regrouping all crossborder buslines; Belgian/Netherlands, France Belgium, France Germany etc. There maybe a better name, but all such categorys should have the same naming convention.Smiley.toerist (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

PS: Is there any article summarising all the ways you can cross the US/Canadian border with public transport? Smiley.toerist (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not saying they shouldn't have a category, I just thought the name could be improved. I couldn't find any article about US-Canada border-crossing public transport, but I do know there are buses, trains, and ferries that do cross the border on a regular basis (some info: [1]). So which one of the names I suggested is best? Or can you think of something better? The current title, at the very least, needs a preposition in it, e.g. "Crossborder buses in Belgium Netherland", and Netherland should be Netherlands. Rocket000 (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
"Crossborder buses between Belgium and the Netherlands" and as head category "Crossborder buses in Europe". The last is maybe not really necessary. (buses in Europe/buses by country) Smiley.toerist (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I moved it to Category:Cross-border buses between Belgium and the Netherlands. I'll leave it up to you to create a parent category if you think it's needed. Rocket000 (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Tramway of Valenciennes[edit]

There will be a new extension to Crespin/Quiévrechain. The terminus of the line will be at the Crespin station Link. Since I have seen on Google Earth that you have put on line some pictures of the facilities there, could it be possible for you to put on Commons some pictures of that area ? Thanks a lot. 195.169.141.54 13:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

It is unclear in the article wat is meant bij station Crespin. There has never been a rail/tram station in Crespin and on the international railway line the station was called Blanc-Misseron but this was some distance away from Crespin. Crespin and Quiévrechain are on the opposite side of the railway and cannot be served by the same line. The busline 15 serving the area form Valenciennes goes to the border and then turns back and then serves either the Crespin or Quiévrechain village. I suspect that the tram wil continue from the railwayline North to Crespin (or South to Quiévrechain, but not both). A connecting busline can be started from the Belgian station connecting with the tram and continuing to the village not served by the tram. But this is pure speculation from my part. I find it strange that there not already a bus connection between the Belgian station and France. They dont need a tram to start a crossborder service. There used to be a direct busservice between Mons and Valenciennes. I have doubts about the international traffic to be generated. Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Charleroi TEPCE.png[edit]

Categorie "Old maps of Charleroi" vervangen door "Maps of Charleroi". "Old maps" is voor kaarten van meer dans 70 jaar oud. mvg. --Jmh2o (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

En wat is de regel met File:Liege.RELSE.TULE.SNCV.png? Het gaat over 1939, maar wel met een moderne kaart achtergrond.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Het regel is : een kaart getekend ten minste 70 jaar terug.
Charleroi plan de 1693.jpg Dit is een oude kaart - getekend in 1693.
Charnoy-1600.svg Deze niet - situatie circa 1600 maar getekend in 2009.
--Jmh2o (talk) 07:54, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Postcard Antwerp[edit]

You are probably right. The date given in the description of File:Antwerpen - Schelde.jpg is the posting date. Xenophon (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2011 ( UTC )

Mulhouse tram and tram-train[edit]

Hello Smile I'm really sorry, I don't know if you prefer french or english to talk, then I'll try english even if i'm a French guy lol. First of all, thank you and congratulations for your pictures of Mulhouse tram and tram-train, it's a very good work. I'm in the way to organize categories there, then if you want to change some of them on your own pictures, it's up to you, I try to have more precise categories now that there is a sufficient number of pictures. I just wanted to ask you about the File:Mulhouse - tramway map.png you recently updated. It's nice but there is a little part of line 1 missing on North, the 3 stops opened in 2009 after Rattachement (Tuilerie, St Nazaire, and Châtaignier). Would it be possible to add them on the schema? It would be very kind! Thanks again, Cheers! Clin Jeriby (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I dont have the precise information on line 1, (where are the points, crossovers and platforms (centre or side)). Futhermore there is not enough drawing space in that direction, but that can be solved by a break with inset.
French is no problem for me, except I dont write it without errors. (fautes d'orthograph) Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
OK thank you very much Smile then I'll go on in french lol malheureusement je n'ai pas d'outil adapté pour faire ce genre de dessin, mais pour avoir la description exacte de la ligne et de ses croisements, je pense qu'il y a moyen de s'inspirer de ceci: [2] jusqu'au trait noir qui marque l'arrêt de la ligne en l'état, au nord de Châtaignier (la suite étant le plan de l'hypothétique extension en direction de Wittenheim). Voilà, si cela peut aider :-) Jeriby (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Buurtspoorwegen_prov_Antwerpen.png[edit]

Hoi, linksboven staat bij de lijn naar Bergen op Zoom "ATB", dit moet volgens mij nl:ABT zijn. 132.229.117.120 10:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Desio tram 2.jpg rename[edit]

OK, you suppose to explain that in the request as you did. Add it to new request and i will move it. --WhiteWriter speaks 11:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Rolling Stock of TER Alsace[edit]

Hey !

Je vois que tu parles français, je suppose donc que je peux m'adresser ainsi. Mais dis le moi, si tu préfères que je parles anglais. Je souhaitais simplement savoir pourquoi tu as retiré la catégorie Rolling stock of TER Alsace sur les photos du tram-train de la Vallée de la Thur. Il s'agit d'un service spécifique pénétrant un réseau urbain mais il s'agit bien d'un service TER, donc je pense qu'il a sa place ici.

Cordialement, Kevin Benoit [Let's talk about it!] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Pas de probleme. La categorie "U 25600" est une souscategorie de "Rolling stock of TER Alsace". De plus la Categorie "Tram-train Mulhouse-Vallée de la Thur" est une souscategorie de "TER Alsace". Encore ajouter une categorie sur les images et de trop. Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Ah, je n'avais pas vu ! Autant pour moi. Parfait, alors. Cordialement, Kevin Benoit [Let's talk about it!] 11:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Mariemont Splitsing.jpg[edit]

Hi Smiley.toerist, in your last comment on VP you suggested to let both "duplicate" images stay. However, shortly thereafter you tagged one of them for dupe-speedy, which I then performed without knowing of your earlier VP comment, which then led to this discussion on my talkpage. Am I correct to assume that your later edit expresses your "final will"? --Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but I had some hesitation because the corrected version (without haze) is so much smaller. The community often prefers to keep the biggest images and edit them themselves. It was my mistake, I didn't realize I had already uploaded the image, otherwise I would have just uploaded the newer version and the old version would stil be available. The commons should signal that there is already a version with capital letter extention. Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
wOUAW Lietta03love (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments on the deletion request, I will try to sort the files:
  • architecture is the main subject
  • architecture is not the main subject,possible COM:DM to discuss
  • COM:DM (basically files I really shouldn't have listed.).
PierreSelim (talk) 17:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

.[edit]

Category:Motorcars of Belgium[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Motorcars of Belgium has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−


Hopefully this shouldn't be a problem - a better name should be Category:Railcars of Belgium. Thanks.Mddkpp (talk) 12:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Bus in Lazio[edit]

I have no idea, maybe you can find it on google maps street view.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

To long a name[edit]

I messed up a file name with an unintended extra (Dutch) description sentence in the name. The rename was refused as no valid reason. Come on! I agree that "To long a Name" is not a valid reason, but junk in the name is.

File:Splitsing spoorlijnen 109 en 111 met wachterhuis in Thuillies. Beide spoorlijnen zijn verbouwd als RAVel fietspad..JPG Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I believe you have incorrectly piped the {{Rename}}. I have corrected it but I think you should still define a better rationale per rename criteria. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 11:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Antwerpen 1930s Boerentoren.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Antwerpen 1930s Boerentoren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.149.75 20:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Correcting perpectives[edit]

Hey, I have answerd you on Villagepump. see here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Correcting_perpectives . Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 08:57, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Backup village pump[edit]

HAL Rotterdam terminal en schip.JPG
HAL Rotterdam terminal en schip1a.JPG

Is there some procedure or tool to correct perspective problems? (leaning towers etc) One example is File:HAL Rotterdam terminal en schip.JPG, where someone corrected the image with File:HAL Rotterdam terminal en schip1a.JPG.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Lens correction tools can do this. See a tutorial at [3]. Dcoetzee (talk) 08:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Gimp, among others, does it. Gimp 2.8: tools/transformation/perspective --Jwh (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
But GIMP does not have the ability to correct barrel/pincushion distortion, does it? /ℇsquilo 12:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
You can find this tool under Filters > Distorts > Lens Distortion... There's a documentation about it on docs.gimp.org. Make sure you've got your GIMP updated to the latest version (although the lense correction feature has been already added in GIMP 2.3.12 beta). Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Cool, thanks! /ℇsquilo 19:37, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks too, Peter! --Jwh (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

There is a dedicated software for this. Its called ViewPoint from DxO. Details are here: http://www.dxo.com/uk/photo/dxo_viewpoint/introduction - Amada44  talk to me 08:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Michelin nr 66, 1940 Belfort.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Michelin nr 66, 1940 Belfort.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Michelin nr 66, 1940 Belfort.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michelin nr 66, 1940 Belfort.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 21:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Metalic_trams[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Metalic_trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- Tuválkin 17:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

New Version[edit]

Do you know the link on file pages saying "Upload a new version of this file"? I think it would be easier for you to upload new versions using this form. --McZusatz (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks: It is a much more logical place.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Er klopt iets niet[edit]

Hi, I'll do this in Dutch.... Over File:Interieur_-_Dordrecht_-_20063247_-_RCE.jpg: de beschrijving lijkt me niet te kloppen met de inhoud. Hoe komt dat? Weet jij dat? En weet je hoe je erachter zou kunnen komen wat het wel is? Groet - Dick Bos (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

De andere beelden kloppen ook niet met de Wijnstraat in het hartje Dordrecht. Ik vrees dat er een administratieve mismatch is geweest. Ik zal even in de kroeg vragen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Handwritten international tickets.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Handwritten international tickets.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Uncorrect date on a postcard[edit]

Hallo, this image cannot be from 1915: the tramcar is clearly a unit of the series 2500, built from 1932.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

The dates on the back are confusing: handwritten is 25 - XII - XV. The stamp is Torino, 18-19, 26 . XII, 36 XV. The poststamp is 20 cent? I have a suspicion that it is year 15 of the election of fascists in the parlement 1921 (1936 - 15 = 1921). This should make it the year 1936. Smiley.toerist (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
The "Fascist Era" (E.F.) started on 28th October 1922. Then XV E.F.: from 28th October 1936 to 27th October 1937. So 25 - XII - XV = 25th December 1936.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Smiley.toerist. You have new messages at Storkk's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Storkk (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Aanleg metrostation Heizel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aanleg metrostation Heizel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:OV-chipkaart promotie in Friesland.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:OV-chipkaart promotie in Friesland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Badner_Bahn_Old_Trams[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Badner_Bahn_Old_Trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

   FDMS  4    08:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Category: Tatranská Štrba (train station)[edit]

Hi, sorry, I cannot understand why you made category Tatranská Štrba (train station). Oficial name of the station is Štrba. Especially when you moved only some photos into that new category. --PetrS. (talk) 06:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

The two categories "Štrba (train station)" and "Tatranská Štrba (train station)" already existed. Tatranská Štrba is used for the meter gauge part of the station while Štrba for the mainline part of the station. However there where also meter gauge pictures in the Štrba category wich I moved. I have made Tatranská Štrba a subcategory of Štrba. It is already a subcategory of "Ozubnicová železnica Štrba - Štrbské Pleso" the small track railway line. To avoid confusion the category "Tatranská Štrba (train station)" should be renamed. I wil make a suggestion.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I created a new Category:Poprad-Tatry railway station (Tatra Electric Railways) for the other joint station.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Sailing ship and lightship.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sailing ship and lightship.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 13:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

ITX-Saemaeul[edit]

According to the source I got from Korea Railway Information Center, highest speed as follows:

  • Highest speed during operation: 150Km/h
  • Highest speed technically: 165Km/h

Hope this helps, — Revi 18:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, 150km/u is not the commercial speed (all in, including stops). I was afraid of that.Smiley.toerist (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

If you need help regarding Korean Raildroad, feel free to ask me on my talk page. :) — Revi 16:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Elmers End station (tram)[edit]

There is no way that a subdivision of the station category like this is warranted - it's not as if the tram part is separate like at Beckenham - it's just another platform. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Any station category can be further subdivided, as an extreme example Category:Antwerp Central Station. These subcategories have to be practical and usefull. In this category there only one picture (File:All change - geograph.org.uk - 225392.jpg) wich is dual tram/train. All the rest have only tram or the rest of the station as subject. I could name the category "tram platform" only this is to specific for some pictures. (File:Tram 2558 at Elmers End.jpg but I classify this one as between tram stops). The big advantage of having this subcategory is that this can be placed under the tram stop categories and other tram categories. There are to many non-tram pictures to classify te whole Elmers End station category as a tram-stop. You can of course classify the pictures individualy as a tram stop but then you mess up the category Tramlink stops where everything is subcategorized by individual tram stops. Eventualy Tramlink stops en trams will have to be categorised by routenumber as most big tramnetworks. For the vehicles I dont suppose you have a problem with "Trains at Elmers End" and "Trams at Elmers End" subcategories. I am aware that the Commons adapts to local taste for categorisations and I respect that. I would like to know how other UK Wikipedians think about these issues. Therefore I would like to discus this in the Village Commons.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Verzoekje[edit]

Beste Smiley.toerist,

Ik kwam een Flickr stream tegen met allemaal foto's van treinen en d8 he, dat zijn leuke bruikbare foto's en heb ze vervolgens overzet naar Commons. Ware het niet dat ik geen flauw benul heb hoe ik sommige moet categoriseren. Heb je misschien zin om me met een paar foto's te helpen? Ze staan in Category:Images uploaded by Natuur12 (clcean up2) en wanneer ze in de juiste cat staan kan de categorie "Category:Images uploaded by Natuur12 (clcean up2)" verwijderd worden. Als je wilt helpen graag want volgens mij zitten er best wat waardevolle foto's tussen. Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

De eerste stap is deze beelden per land en jaartal te klasseren: voorbeeld: 2007 in transport in Belgium.Smiley.toerist (talk) 19:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Ik heb al een flink aantal Belgische opnames verwerkt. Van sommige kan ik de locatie niet achterhalen. Hij is meer "materieel" man dan een station en spoorlijn liefhebber.Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Dank voor de tip en de hulp. Treinen zijn niet mijn ding maar ik geloof wel dat dit soort fotocollecties waardevol zijn voor de toekomst. Natuur12 (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Het is nu gereduceerd tot 336 beelden. Veel beelden zijn van trein excursies naar bijzondere plekken in het Luikse industrie gebied. Kom je dus niet zo vaak tegen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Geweldig :). Dankjewel. Mooi dat er toch wat zeldzame beelden tussen zitten. Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Alle Belgische plaatjes zijn verwerkt en ik ga nu ook die van Nederland doen. Het zijn er niet zoveel.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Alles is nu teruggebracht tot 138 beelden. Ik heb vermoedelijk alle Europese beelden eruit gevist. (misschien nog een paar uit de Baltische staten) Je moet nu nog een Japanner en een Amerikaan vinden om de rest grotendeels weg te werken.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Geweldig!. Heel veel dank. Zelf zou me dat echt nooit gelukt zijn gezien mijn beperkte kennis van treinen enzo. Natuur12 (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Het zou heel veel helpen als Category:Photographs by Peter Van den Bossche in cronologische zit. Want dan zitten alle beelden van dezelfde reis bij elkaar en is het bepalen van de locatie gemakkelijker. Nu is alles door elkaar volgens de alfabetische volgorde. Voor die 3 diesellocomotieven die in 1999 ergens in het oosten zijn.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Ik ben klaar.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Plaza del Caudillo in Valencia.jpg[edit]

Thank you for a couple of postcards of my hometown! But I find some problems with Plaza del Caudillo in Valencia.jpg. That square is the main one in the city and it has had many names. Originally was know as Bajada de San Francisco. Later was renamed Plaza de Emilio Castelar. I think that the name was kept during de Civil War, but when the Francoist troops arrived (April 1939) it was changed to Plaza del Caudillo. About 1979 it was named Plaça del País Valencià and in the 1980s it became Plaça de l'Ajuntament. So in the 1930s it wasn't called del Caudillo, as Franco didn't use that title yet. I think that the picture is from the 1950s as the Ateneo Building, which was built in 1953, can be seen.
The other picture, the trams, is correctly located (that corner still exists and hasn't changed much) and the date could be right or wrong, I don't have a clue. Other user from Valencia could help you with that (Joanbanjo, for instance). B25es (talk) 05:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

The two pictures where joined together so the dating is similar. I based my dating on the cars, but I suppose at that time Spain didn't import many cars, so you could have a Cuba-effect (only old cars in use). The building places the images in the 1950s. These are postcards without any identifying marks so I suppose these where official post office postcards. This classifies them as anonymous but unfortunataly not old enough for the eu-anonymous (70 years) unless Spain has a different PD age. Theoreticaly the tram picture could still be from 1930s as the postcard publication date can be long after the picture is taken. The editors often reuse an old picture collection. User:Smiley.toerist|Smiley.toerist]] (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Spoorzone-project_(rail)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Spoorzone-project_(rail) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Tukka (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

File:FEVE Baskenland Deba 2.jpg[edit]

The description should be changed, too ;-) Wieralee (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Trams in Liege[edit]

The tram network in Liège (1939)

Thank you for your wonderful map of the tramlines in Liege in 1939. It is really hard to find enough information or online sources to make a half way decent attempt at a translation based english language entry on the Liege trams before 1967.

(But yes, that is what I have been trying to do. Bien entendu, suis fou.)

PLEASE can you do something even more and tell me what the colo(u)rs means?

   Black lines = RELSE (?main line trains)
   Blue lines = TULE (?tramlines or ?trolleybus routes)
   Red lines = SNCV electric (
   Green lines = SNCV non-electric

I tried starting to guess but ... no, I think I've been guessing it wrong.

I am sorry I cannot write to you in Dutch. But I can write:

Besten Dank, succes en groetjes Charles01 (talk) 05:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Expanded comments. The full history is even more complicated see File:Tram companies in Liege province.png.Smiley.toerist (talk) 07:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Montpellier trein 2015 Evian.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Montpellier trein 2015 Evian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:EPF conference 2014 II.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EPF conference 2014 II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 05:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)