User talk:Tom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Click here to add a new message, and I will respond soon. You can also send me an e-mail if you would prefer.
I am active on the English Wikipedia as well. Click here to contact me through that site's talk page.


201.221.202.148 07:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit]

hi

¿cual es el nombre de los cinco estados de rolor rojo en el mapa político que publicaste?

)

--201.221.202.148 07:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Tony Blair with Romano Prodi at G8, cropped to Blair.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

William Avery 12:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Tony Blair with Romano Prodi at G8, cropped to Prodi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

William Avery 20:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Jacques Chirac at the G8, 16 July 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

William Avery 20:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National Football League

[edit]

Could you please make me an example of a wrong removing? I'm not sure to have understood. So I can also fix that mistakes. Thank you --Trixt 21:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see now Image:Jerome Bettis at Health event, May 2005, cropped.jpg. It is in Category:Pittsburgh Steelers, that is a subcategory of Category:National Football League, so, why it is not redundant? Thank you --Trixt 21:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Good work --Trixt 00:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Ben_Bernanke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

84.108.245.222 14:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Alan_Greenspan_color_photo_portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

84.108.245.222 14:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:George Tenet portrait headshot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 84.108.245.222 14:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:Image:Chinese embassy.jpg

[edit]

tagging corrected I hope, sorry for that, but to me it was quite obvious that a low res photo taken in a war zone, and uploaded together with a same quality shots of Putin and Ten-Day War is a copyvio. I'll try to improve and give more specific explanations in the future :) --Robek (talk|contribs) 19:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could I ask why you deleted this image? It was an entirely user-made image, in no way related to or being a derivative work of the official logo. Cheers --Pak21 10:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Pak21 14:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic congestion, special lane

[edit]

Hi. Image:Rita evacuees from Houston Texas September 21 2005.jpg seems to show a reserved lane near the median? Any idea what it is? Is that a emergency vehicle specific lane? A HOV lane? Bus lane? Ingolfson 07:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTF

[edit]

Hey tom, Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Fcb981 you going to unclose this or what. Give me a chance to relicense. I just got the message today. respond here. I got it watched.

Well nevermind tommy, looks as if twas only a bot messing up. sorry to bother you. -Fcb981 05:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:DRBot#heheh. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Elizabeth's Hospital, D.C.

[edit]

Hi,

I saw that you posted a picture in 2006 of the old, abandoned St. Elizabeth's hospital in South East Washington D.C., and I'm wondering if you knew the address for it. You see, I wanted to photograph it and I'm not sure exactly where it's located.

Thanks a lot for your consideration, Z. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zkhan4 (talk • contribs) at 03:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying; the map will help. I'm going to try to talk to someone there (rather than sneak around in SouthEast DC by myself; it's scary) and see if it's ok for me to photograph the place before they start building new offices. I think it's worth a try if it still looks anything like the photo you posted. Thanks again for all your help, I really appreciate it! :) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zkhan4 (talk • contribs) at 20:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Dear Tom, thanks for letting me know about the lack of source information. However, I'm wondering why it is not uploading with my images? I am selecting all the drop down boxes for licensing info, I'm filling in all the blanks, and I don't see other images needing repeated edits to add source info, so just curious why it isn't working for me. I have added info to all images I've uploaded. Thanks again, ArielGold 06:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom, as I mentioned, I did update all of the images I've uploaded, using that template, but I thought I'd let you know that that template is not on the upload page, nor does it specify it should be used (I went to another image, and simply copied the template from that). I'd just like to note that for someone unfamiliar with the specifics of Commons policy, that template is not even shown as an option when you're uploading a file. There are three fields it asks you to fill in: File name, Summary, and the drop down to select licensing information. So I'd just like to ask for clarification: Do all users who upload images, then have to go back in and edit them to add that description box, after upload? I did try to add that information to the summary box, but it doesn't appear, it appears in the file's history edit summary field instead. See here for what happened when I added it to the "summary" box during upload. I'd appreciate any insight you can offer for me in the future, thanks! ArielGold 11:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! Yes, that looks more like what I was expecting. It is just that so far, the only images I've uploaded were NASA (or NOAA) and obviously US Gov images, so I always selected that option from the upload screen. Thanks ever so much! ArielGold 14:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(going to speedy this as a copyvio)

[edit]

WOuld you mind to explain this statement in complete english sentences? --212.202.113.214 12:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

[edit]

Hi Tom, I recently created the article William Franklin Draper, and one of his most famous portraits was that of John F. Kennedy, which is on the US Smithsonian's website, here, and larger version here. I'd like to know if this image can be used with Fair Use rationale as a low-resolution {{Non-free 2D art}} in the article. Thanks in advance for answering! ArielGold 23:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Billy_Graham_bw_photo,_April_11,_1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

BenB4 04:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this up. I felt bad about being too lazy to implement it before.--Pharos 22:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bagram Air Base

[edit]

The tanks from the Soviet era are relocated, also, they are not part of Bagram Air Base. Vehicles are usually moved from place to place. Besides, there is a suitable catelog for it (Soviet war in Afghanistan).--Executioner 01:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a free second, this image could use an update; last numbers appear to be from June '07. Thanks, auburnpilot (talk|en.wiki) 15:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:George_W._Bush_public_opinion_polling.png

[edit]

Would it be possible for you to update this image to an svg and include the information until Sept 2007?

--grey1618 17:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony C. Zinni

[edit]

I uploaded the picture because in that picture, he's the CENTCOM commander, and he's got some more decorations, for example the Navy Distinguished Service Medal... That's a reason to upload a more recent photo, isn't it? Just compare the two photos... Plus, on your photo, he's got only three stars, while on the one I uploaded, he's got 4 stars... So, please next time, don't be TOO quick in reverting images... Thanks! Claudevsq 19:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Winston Churchill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 06:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: DRBot deletion backlog

[edit]

Yes, but only once a day, and it only archives if the page has not been touched for 24 hours, so it can take two days before a page is archived. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: POTY on the frontpage

[edit]

It was last year until April. I don't think a banner is a good idea since you don't know the width of the user's monitor, or the image would be really small... But maybe discuss it on Talk:Main page? -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bush Update

[edit]

It's time to update; the latest pool numbers have Mr Bush at 19% (Nixon at 24% when he resigned)...

Aspie

FedEx Field

[edit]

You're absolutely right. Thanks for the correction. Bgag

Memorial_Drive_entering_Arlington_National_Cemetery,_from_above.jpg‎

[edit]

Tom, I wonder if you can identify the source of this image posted on the Commons. I'd be interested in using it for an academic publication if I can verify that it's public domain. Thanks!The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.197.139.184 (talk • contribs) at 03:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image was kept by you at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Hamid Karzai 150.jpg as there was no evidence that it is not a work by VoA. Well, here is evidence that it is not work by VoA. The image was taken from here and modified by someone in which the Afghan men in the background were covered with the 1992 to 1996 Afghan flag. [1] All images at the site http://afghanland.com/ are copyrighted.--Executioner 16:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seth MacFarlane image

[edit]

Hi, I appreciate your work with the Seth MacFarlane image, but for the sake of other users who want to modify the original picture, please upload your version of the file separately from the OTRS confirmed image. Thanks. miranda 17:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image update

[edit]

Here's your requested update reminder. Your Image:George W. Bush public opinion polling.png only goes to Februari. It would be nice if you can make it up to date. 71.231.85.5 06:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Patterson Hall at the University of Maryland

[edit]

Hi,

I work with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. We are preparing an exhibit to commemorate the 200th birthday of Abraham Lincoln to be installed at the Surratt House Museum in Maryland. I would like to use your photograph of Patterson Hall at UMD (seen in the wikipedia article on the University of Maryland)in this exhibit. I see that it has a Creative Commons license. May I have permission to use the photo, and if so, how should it be credited? You can reach me at Janet.Matthews@pgparks.com.

Regards, Janet Matthews


Image deletion warning Image:Cynthia_McKinney_Congressional_photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Nard the Bard 18:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Reed portrait

[edit]

Much more recent high resolution head shots are available for downloading on Senator Reed's official web site: [[2]]


Image deletion warning Image:Ralph_Ellison_photo_portrait_seated.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

65.96.164.13 14:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this right?

[edit]

I've uploaded this image to commons. I mostly upload photos of my own work, so I'm not sure of the legality on this one. I'm not sure that I got the copyright correct. Can you check over it? Thanks!--Sallicio (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've put a notice on my talk page concerning this file. I just transferred it to Commons via CommonsHelper; I've got nothing to do with its sources or anything. Maybe you should take a look at the circumstances under which a picture has been uploaded. I only do the job the people in en-WP are obviously not able to do: transferring the pics to Commons which are needed in any WP project, not only in the english language WP. Don't blame me for missing licences. You should ask the person who uploaded it to en-WP. --Scooter (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Zarqawi dead us govt photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rama (talk) 08:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Not so) Speedy

[edit]

Sorry about this. Seemed odd to "speedy" when the file was four months old. That's not so speedy.  :) Doulos Christos (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nixon

[edit]

I put in an undeletion request for the Nixon portrait, so that it can be discussed. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watt photos

[edit]

Hello Tom

A search of WikiMedia Commons shows that you used the following image

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:School_of_reef_fish_at_Rapture_Reef,_French_Frigate_Shoals.jpg

Please note that this image is the copyright of James D. Watt, a professional photographer. It is not, as stated in WikiMedia, in the public domain. We realize that you were mis-led in this, but would appreciate it if you would confirm that you will discontinue any usage of this image.

We have requested of WikiMedia Commons that they remove this image.


Aloha Christine Sheppard

for Ocean Stock 77-6425 Kuakini Highway, Suites D-201 Kailua Kona HI 96740 www.wattstock.com wattstock@seapics.com 808-329-4253 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.225.211 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting them, Tom - I was just coming over to check them out in response to OTRS #2009040210075884 (a request similar to the one above), and saw that you'd beat me to it :) Cheers, and thanks again, Daniel (meta talk) 23:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD review

[edit]

I came across some of your PD images and invite you to participate in and become a reviewer at Commons:PD filesRlevseTalk 22:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are two thread currently on AN about how we got started. RlevseTalk 22:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Is the link [3] correct? I cannot open it--Александр Мотин (talk) 15:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work improving the image! Hekerui (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genevieve Nnaji's picture

[edit]

Hi. Your assistance is needed in this case here. A few days ago I uploaded this picture to wikimedia commons. I then got the written email permission from the owner of the picture and forwarded the email to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org. After that I contacted someone with an OTRS account, Trixt. Trixt confirmed the permission and fully released the picture under the required license. A few days later Trixt tagged the picture with the "Personality rights warning" tag. I asked Trixt why this is being done. You can read the reply of Trixt here and here on our talk pages. Finally, Trixt wrote me, saying that his english is bad, that I should get in touch with an English admin, that he doesn't know what to do.

I have checked through many wikipedia pages and have taken a close look at the pictures used from wikimedia commons. There are loads of pictures that do not have the "Personality rights warning" tag. Trixt claims that all pictures of living people should have that tag. This claim makes the whole issue suspicious. If all pictures of living people must be tagged with the "Personality rights warning", and the only way to properly upload pictures into wikimedia-commons is to get the approval of someone with an OTRS account, then what happened to all those pictures AFTER they were confirmed by someone with an OTRS account? How come those people with OTRS accounts didn't immediately tag these pictures with the "Personality rights warning" tag, the way Trixt did to the picture I uploaded? This looks like a double standard, and I thusly ask you to look into this and please remove the "Personality rights warning" tag from the picture in question.

The picture in question shows a nigerian actress, Genevieve Nnaji, in 2008 at a public event, the launch of Genevieve's new fashion label. Genevieve Nnaji is one of the top nigerian Nollywood actresses. She is also a model. Her pictures are all over Nigeria and Africa on billboards (she is the Face of Lux 2004), and she has played in over 100 Nollywood movies. Thus Genevieve Nnaji is a "person of contemporary history". She is a public figure. The picture I uploaded was taken by Niyi Tabiti, a nigerian journalist. Mr Tabiti has fully agreed to the full usage of the picture under wikimedia commons license. There are no personality right infringed with the usage of this picture. If wikimedia-commons claims, like Trixt does, that all pictures of living persons SHOULD be tagged, then this rule must apply to all pictures on wikimedia-commons. The fact that wikimedia-commons has thousands of pictures of living persons without the "Personality rights warning" proves that different standards are being applied to different pictures. I thereby ask you to please remove the "Personality rights warning" from this picture. Thank you.
Amsaim (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This request was duplicated across many pages. See User_talk:Amsaim for the consolidated discussion. I also took it to Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#A_situation_to_keep_an_eye_on. ++Lar: t/c 20:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Tom!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well can u send me a message on kekelewis64@yahoo.com please!!!

Headline text

[edit]

FP Nomination

[edit]

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Michael Gernhardt in space during STS-69 in 1995.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Michael Gernhardt in space during STS-69 in 1995.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine

[edit]

Hello, Sorry for spaming your talk page, but this is very important. On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. Also they believe that common's policy is not so clear regarding the issue. And since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A.Talk 14:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Tom. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald_Winter,_official_photo_as_Secretary_of_the_Navy,_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Benchill (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:Ed Case, official photo portrait color.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ed Case, official photo portrait color.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 23:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tucson_shoot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A_young_Marine_private_waits_on_the_beach_during_the_Marine_landing_in_Da_Nang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marco dimmi tutto! 19:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question about process

[edit]

I'm not sure how you usually do things on Commons, but can I go ahead and make the moves requested at Commons:Categories for discussion/2010/12/Category:Delegates to the House of Representatives? No-one has closed the request (a thing I'd usually wait for on en.wiki), but it's been open for a long time and the comments seem to say that the move would be okay. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Tom. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John F. Kennedy, White House color photo portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jfkverite (talk) 03:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HowardCoble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powers (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USSenators has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bill Clinton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.97.3.37 21:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roosevelt20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Khazar2Commons (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Tom. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 08:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
please Chauthuy2013 (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
Hi Tom,

Please let me know how can I get permission to use the Catarina hurricane picture you posted on the Wikimedia?

Thanks. Chauthuy2013 (talk) 04:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
Hi Tom,

Please let me know how can I get permission to use the Catarina hurricane picture you posted on the Wikimedia?

Thanks. Chauthuy2013 (talk) 04:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
Hi Tom,

Please let me know how can I get permission to use the Catarina hurricane picture you posted on the Wikimedia?

Thanks. Chauthuy2013 (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
Hi Tom,

Please let me know how can I get permission to use the Catarina hurricane picture you posted on the Wikimedia?

Thanks. Chauthuy2013 (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aerial view of the port of Mogadishu.JPEG. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

čeština | English | svenska | русский | മലയാളം | 中文 | 中文(简体) | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

xxl

[edit]
xxl
hellooo Vietnamka (talk) 19:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Tom, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Odle, photo portrait, Nixon administration, black and white.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for YOU!!

[edit]
Boooo !!!! We miss you!! We wish you were more active, please log in soon and help us with the backlog!!
Hope to see you around again soon!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:US-DeptOfTheTreasury-Seal.png

[edit]

Hi Tom- I am a graphic designer for the U.S. Department of the Treasury and we are currently trying to ensure correct usage and versions of the Department of the Treasury seal. We have come across the aforementioned in the subject line above, and would like to have it removed for Wikimedia Commons. This version was never approved by the agency and we would like to have it not available for reference. Thank you, Timothy Garner Visual Information Specialist Printing and Graphics Division U.S. Department of the Treasury

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Tom, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Tom, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2017 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 02:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Cantwell official photo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hi Tom help me i was blocked

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iridescent&oldid=prev&diff=899351930&diffmode=source&fbclid=IwAR2erNZv4720XZT0uWV_nucupN9x3qhxrF0fTbAZK1-a4txAf22Z_lg1llM there because iridicent posted a woman of despair figure of a Administrator is that how they look at me after i waste my time and effort just to give them a right tool for their journal and editorial this what i can get in return i was at the www. domain developer programmer of thew software i should gain RESPECT from doing my job as USA computer system Admin

File:Lawrence J Hogan 93rd Congressional Pictorial Directory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--- Coffeeandcrumbs 09:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONDCP-seal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 09:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:James Abram Garfield, photo portrait seated.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:James Abram Garfield, photo portrait seated.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rep Louise Slaughter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]