User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Talk archive
Talk archive
Talk archive

Кантакты для дасылання файлаў[edit]

Вітаю! Я Уладзімір Садоўскі і я заўважыў, што вы часта загружаеце на вікіпедыю фоткі ўзятыя з маіх соцсетак. Прашу, дайце мне вашы кантакты ці звяжыцеся са мной праз тэлеграм (нік @yozas_gubka) каб я мог дасылаць вам файлы напрамую і без сціскання якасці, якое адбываецца ў соцсетках, таксама ў мяне ёсць шэраг старых фотаздымкаў, якія я нікуды не выкладаў і гатовы з вамі падзяліцца для вікіпедыі. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozas gubka (talk • contribs) 10:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю, Уладзімер. Вялікі дзякуй за прапанову, гэта было б проста выдатна! Тэлеграм я праглядаю спарадычна і звычайна праз браўзэр, а вось эл. пошту правяраю два разы на дзень (бо туды ідуць паведамленьні з анлайн-аўкцыёнаў), таму гэта быў бы больш зручны для мяне варыянт. Адрас — mrulmrul@yandex.by. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Полацк у 1812 годзе[edit]

[1] --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

І яшчэ графіка Манюшкаў не ўся загружаная. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 07:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Шмат малюнкаў Часлава Манюшкі [2] --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 09:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Роспісы Халоднай сінагогі ў Магілёве [3] --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Некалькі партрэтаў Ваньковічаў [4], можа яшчэ якія знойдзеце --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Можаце загрузіць адсюль здымкі? У нас, здаецца, і паловы здымкаў з гэтых няма, а там дзеячы БЦР, БАПЦ, сядзібы БЦР і Генкамісарыята. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Напраўду, значная частка з гэтай зборкі ўжо ёсьць у Вікісховішчы: гэта найперш здымкі, загружаныя раней нямецкім Бундэсархівам (тыя, што маюць неабрэзанае белае поле ўнізе з подпісамі), частку ўжо пасьпеў загрузіць і я, нямала яшчэ неідэнтыфікаваных мясцовасьцяў (як напрыклад, будынак беларускай паліцыі або электрычны млын), ёсьць яшчэ здымкі з нацыстоўскай сымболікай або партрэтамі Гітлера побач з нацыянальнымі сымбалямі, якія мне, шчыра кажучы, загружаць ня надта хочацца. Магчыма, нейкія здымкі цяжка знайсьці тут праз пакуль што недастаткова дэталёвую катэгарызацыю — я ўсё загружанае помню, без праблем дапамагу знайсьці. У кожным разе, убачыў некалькі здымкаў, якіх яшчэ не загружаў + таксама загружу здымкі беларускіх дзеячоў адпаведнага пэрыяду, дзякуй за спасылкі! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Паўстанцы [5] [6] --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Паглядзіце ўнізе тэксту партрэты, можа якога няма --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Тут у вельмі добрая якасці ёсць выявы з "Жывапіснай Расіі". Мясціны ў нас загружаныя, а вось бытавыя сцэнкі з беларускага жыцця, здаецца, не --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ромераў варта дацягнуць --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Нясвіж на малюнках Ігнацыя Урублеўскага. Увогуле я выпадкова патрапіў, калі шукаў "6 fotograficznych reprodukcji portretów wykonanych przez Wróblewskiego (na odwrocie nazwiska sportretowanych: Alfons Oskierka, Eustachy Dziekoński, gen. Stanisław Bychowiec, z x. Lubeckich Bychowcowa Stanisławowa, Bychowiec - ojciec Stanisława).", якія згадваюцца тут, можа вы здолееце адшукаць гэтыя партрэты 😔 --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Выдатная і вельмі цікавая знаходка, якая цалкам імаверна, магла згубіцца па сканчэньні аўкцыёну (невялікі аўкцыённы дом, брак папулярных ключавых словаў). Дзякуй вялікі! Што датычыцца памянёных партрэтаў, то ў мяне, на жаль, таксама не атрымалася іх знайсьці і выглядае, што наўрад ці яны ёсьць у інтэрнэце: аўкцыённы дом Rara Avis у сваім архіве выкладае толькі каталёгі і пры продажы, здаецца, не дублюе сваіх прапановаў на вялікіх аўкцыённых парталах (а ў яго бягучых прапановах, вядома, ужо нічога няма). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
А фотаздымкі канца 1940-х загружаеце? [7] [8] --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 10:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Некалі мастацкіх твораў, можа чаго няма (Магілёў там не наш, а Падольскі) --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Беларускія вайсковыя часткі ў літоўскай арміі 1918-1923 гг. (на літоўскай мове). Шмат фотаздымкаў і беларускіх архіўных дакументаў. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 22:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Планіроўкі і эскізныя праекты Дома ўрада Лангбарда. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Некалькі гравюр Міхала Падалінскага --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Зірніце, ці ўсе старыя здымкі Бабруйска адсюль у нас ёсць. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1 ня ведаю мясцовасьці + здымак хутчэй за усё паваенны, 2 хутчэй за ўсё позьні паваенны здымак, [9], 3 позьні паваенны здымак, 4 ня ведаю мясцовасьці, можа і не Бабруйск увогуле. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Пару пабудоў з в. Падліпцы (і можа што яшчэ) --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Паўстанец Уладзіслаў Малахоўскі --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 13:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Фотаздымкі Тышкевічаў, Валадковічаў, Забелаў у літ. музеях --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
шмат планаў па беларускіх губернях і беларускіх арэалах. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 16:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Беларускія абразы з НГМРБ --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 09:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Здаецца, у нас не ўвесь Рустэм ёсць --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 09:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

І па Высокім не ўсе інтэр'еры ёсць --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
З гістарычнага архіва --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Станцыя Лоўша, можа яшчэ што там знойдзецца --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ёсць падазрэнне, што гэты партрэт і гэтая магіла - аднаго чалавека. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 07:44, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Адбой, партрэт ужо загружаны.
Так, у 2021 годзе з MNW была масавая загрузка ботам, таму адтуль цяпер хіба толькі нядаўна дададзенае (што праўда нейкі сьпіс абнаўленьняў яны больш, здаецца, не публікуюць). Наконт партрэта: векам (42-гады), здаецца, пасуе, але хіба засмучвае тое, што на надмагільлі не пазначылі другое імя. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Дубнікі --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 07:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Сядзіба ў Дамашэвічах. Ёсць яшчэ Брынёў, Янопаль, але не разумею, ці можна неяк выцянуць у нармальнай якасці. --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Чаховіч Уладзіслаў, выцягнуць у іншай якасьці, здаецца, немагчыма. Зрэшты, Мечыслаў Ялавецкі (1876-1963) нарадзіўся на тэрыторыі Летувы, а гэтыя свае малюнкі стварыў паводле старых фотаздымкаў ужо на эміграцыі ў Вялікабрытаніі, таму наўрад ці можна хоць неяк ужыць {{PD-Belarus}}. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indura, Alaksandraŭskaja. Індура, Аляксандраўская (1881).jpg[edit]

Вітаю, а што азначае слова "Аляксандраўская" ў назве файла. Цікава, для якой царквы ствараўся гэты іканастас, для Траецкай? --Хомелка (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю. Дзеля ляканічнасьці цэрквы звычайна называюць прыметнікамі, утворанымі да імёнаў у поўным тытуле. Аляксандраўская — больш ляканічны варыянт поўнага тытула царквыў імя (Сьвятога) Аляксандра Неўскага. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bienica, Kocieł, Śviran. Беніца, Коцел, Сьвіран (1937).jpg[edit]

File:Bienica, Kocieł, Śviran. Беніца, Коцел, Сьвіран (1937).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любіць Зямлю 2020[edit]

10 красавіка Анастасія Пятрова зь «Вікімэдыі Ўкраіны» напісала мне на электронную пошту пра 8-е міжнароднае фотаспаборніцтва «Вікі любіць Зямлю» ад 1 траўня па 31 ліпеня. Прапаную зладзіць спаборніцтва на краёвым узроўні, бо бачу штодзённы ўнёсак на Вікісховішчы. Змагу дапамагчы пасьля 31 траўня, калі скончу весьці Віківясну-2020. Летась User:Renessaince стварыў па-беларуску старонку ВікіСховішча:Вікі любіць Зямлю-2019, якую можна перарабіць да сёлетняга спаборніцтва. У лісьце Анастасіі таксама згадвалася: «Мы заклікаем Вас зьвярнуцца па імклівы грант (да $2000) ад Фундацыі «Вікімэдыя». Тэрмін бягучага цыклю заявак доўжыцца ад 1 да 15 траўня». «Ёсьць узнагароды на кожную краіну. Мясцовыя каманды могуць мець узнагароды для пераможцаў у мясцовых турах». Па дапамогу заклікала пісаць на wle-team@wikimedia.org.ua.--User:W 11:51, 24 красавіка 2020 (UTC+3)

Калі я разумею правільна, то ўмовай удзелу ў конкурсе ёсьць даданьне здымкаў ахоўных прыродных краявідаў. А за гэтымі здымкамі трэба ехаць наўмысна і нярэдка даволі далёка — у тую ж Белавескую пушчу ці як мінімум у які заказьнік. Т.ё. проста на тэлефон у дарозе на працу нічога вартага не сфатаграфуеш. Тут прынамсі варта сьпярша пераканацца, што ў нас ёсьць група ўдзельнікаў, якія любяць езьдзіць у падобныя мясьціны (або раней езьдзіла і зрабіла шмат здымкаў). Асабіста ў мяне, на жаль, у запасе вартых конкурсу здымкаў няма, а ў найбліжэйшы месяц-два наўрад ці давядзецца патрапіць у якую аходную прыродную зону, каб іх зрабіць. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Правільна, у тым ліку мясцовыя расьлінныя (сады), геалягічныя (валуны) і водныя (крыніцы) помнікі прыроды. Ёсьць 14 удзельніцаў і удзельнікаў, якія зрабілі 7430 здымкаў для «Вікі любіць славутасьці». Сёлета да «Вікі любіць фальклёр» 9 удзельніцаў і ўдзельнікаў стварылі 53 здымкі (Category:Images from Wiki Loves Folklore 2020 in Belarus) : User:Volha Aliakseichyk, Alena Tser, Katydarhel, Maria Romanovskaya, Юлия Губаренко, Dendetlet, Padharyzontam, Mikhail Kapychka і Airevgeny.--User:W 11:38, 26 красавіка 2020 (UTC+3)
Пераклаў даведку прылады фотаацэнкі «Мантаж» (Commons:Montage/be-tarask) пад «Вікі любіць Зямлю» ў Беларусі для аблягчэньня судзейства журы ў ліпені.--User:W 15:29, 25 траўня 2020 (UTC+3)

File:Viciebsk, Teatralnaja. Віцебск, Тэатральная (S. Jurkoŭski, 1900).jpg[edit]

File:Viciebsk, Teatralnaja. Віцебск, Тэатральная (S. Jurkoŭski, 1900).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F7 (file is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 21:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Viciebsk, Trynitarskaja. Віцебск, Трынітарская (1943) (2).jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Postcards[edit]

Hello Kazimier Lachnovič, thanks for uploading postcards to commons. Maybe you are interested in COM:WPPC. Best regards --sk (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kazimier Lachnovič, I moved all postcards from "Polack postcards" to Category:Postcards of Polack. This is the standard of COM:WPPC. Best regards. -- sk (talk) 11:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любіць Зямлю[edit]

Прывітаньне! Прабачце, я пакуль вывучаю беларускую мову, таму пішу яшчэ дрэнна. Шчыра рады, што нарэшце зьявілісь людзі, які ўзяліся за конкурс Вікі любіць Зямлю ў Беларусі. Некалькі гадоў таму я атрымаў сьпіс аб'ектаў прыродна-запаведнага фонду Рэспублікі Беларусь. З дапамогаю беларускіх і ўкраінскіх удзельнікаў зрабілі сьпіс у Вікіпедыі (наркомаўке) (таксама па некалькіх вабласьцях пачаў рабіць пераклад в ўкраінскай Вікіпедыі). Ёсьць неабходнасць далучыць гэтат сьпіс да конкурснай старонкі і таксама зрабіць яго у Вікіпедыі клясычным правапісам. З найлепшымі пажаданьнямі, --Visem (talk) 16:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю. Дзякую за спасылку і ўнёсак на беларускую тэматыку. Дадаў гэтую інфармацыю на be-tarask:Абмеркаваньне Вікіпэдыі:Праект:Вікі любіць Зямлю на разгляд супольнасьці. Сам не магу ўзяцца за пераклад, бо гэта даволі вялікая праца ў пляне набору. Але магчыма, хтосьці возьмецца. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (1914).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (1914).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (1914).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 14:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Horadnia, Nioman. Горадня, Нёман (1915-18) (4).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Horadnia, Nioman. Горадня, Нёман (1915-18) (4).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Horadnia, Nioman. Горадня, Нёман (1915-18) (4).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Adcinak.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adcinak.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alcremie (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radziwill[edit]

Why are only Belarusian names included in images of nobles such as Janusz Radziwiłł? Is this one sided? Oliszydlowski (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Media files can be uploaded with names in any language in any script + Commons is not Wikipedia, and files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view. The Radziviłs, as well as the other nobles of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, are one of the main parts of Belarusian history, so the related files can be named in Belarusian. As an uploader I choose Belarusian names, at the same time another uploaders (related example) choose Polish as well as English, Lithuanian (Lietuvian), Ukrainian or Russian names for files they upload. On the other hand no one can prevent any user from adding a description in another language to the file information. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates[edit]

Hi, with duplicates it is preferred to utilise {{Duplicate}} as it is all set up to do the best review and all the work. This is especially important where the file to be deleted is linked, as it will enable the replacements to take place easily too. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vilnia, Kalvaryja. Вільня, Кальварыя (J. Čachovič, 1873).jpg[edit]

Hello. You had uploaded the print from the National Library of Poland and than you have uploaded its "new version", but in fact it was a different print from another institution (National Museum). I know that the image is almost the same, but theses photographs are different: they have different dimensions, inscriptions etc., so the first one shouldn't have been replaced by the second one, but they should have been uploaded separately, as two different files. Please revert your second upload, so that the File:Vilnia, Kalvaryja. Вільня, Кальварыя (J. Čachovič, 1873).jpg represents the photograph from the National Library. Than upload the photograph from the National Museum as a new file. Best regards, Cancre (talk) 13:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Done as you suggested. Thanks for the advise. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Cancre (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1931).jpg[edit]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1931).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1929).jpg[edit]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1929).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1927).jpg[edit]

File:Piatruś Broŭka. Пятрусь Броўка (1927).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Detail from Battle of Orsha[edit]

OK, do it yourself ;-). I just uploaded a high resolution TIFF file. Regards. Gytha (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (25.03.1946).jpg[edit]

Not sure what's going on with File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (25.03.1946).jpg, but please fix it or nominate it for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (25.03.1946).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (25.03.1946).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Naroŭla, Horvat. Нароўля, Горват (25.03.1946).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 03:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Edit warring, censorship, acts of humiliation by users Kazimier Lachnovič and Лобачев Владимир. Edit warring, censorship, acts of humiliation. 
-- Pofka (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Navahradak, Sabornaja. Наваградак, Саборная (S. Klačynski, 1939).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Navahradak, Sabornaja. Наваградак, Саборная (S. Klačynski, 1939).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Navahradak, Sabornaja. Наваградак, Саборная (S. Klačynski, 1939).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Purposeful edit warring performed by user Kazimier Lachnovič (new incident). For performing purposeful and active edit warring.

-- Pofka (talk) 19:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mindoŭh_Hill,_Navahrudak[edit]

Category discussion warning

Mindoŭh Hill, Navahrudak has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kanstantyn Astroski. Канстантын Астроскі (XVI, XIX).jpg[edit]

File:Kanstantyn Astroski. Канстантын Астроскі (XVI, XIX).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kanstantyn Astroski. Канстантын Астроскі (XVII) (4).jpg[edit]

File:Kanstantyn Astroski. Канстантын Астроскі (XVII) (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mindoŭh. Міндоўг (1255, 1393).jpg[edit]

File:Mindoŭh. Міндоўг (1255, 1393).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

78.56.0.227 20:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason). Disruptive naming of the files on purpose..

Copyright status: File:Chatajevičy, Daminikanski. Хатаевічы, Дамініканскі (1900).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Chatajevičy, Daminikanski. Хатаевічы, Дамініканскі (1900).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chatajevičy, Daminikanski. Хатаевічы, Дамініканскі (1900).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Viciebsk, Sianny, Radzilnia. Віцебск, Сянны, Радзільня (1941).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Viciebsk, Sianny, Radzilnia. Віцебск, Сянны, Радзільня (1941).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Viciebsk, Sianny, Radzilnia. Віцебск, Сянны, Радзільня (1941).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mahiloŭ, Rynak-Vietranaja. Магілёў, Рынак-Ветраная (1916).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Mahiloŭ, Rynak-Vietranaja. Магілёў, Рынак-Ветраная (1916).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mahiloŭ, Rynak-Vietranaja. Магілёў, Рынак-Ветраная (1916).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahiloŭ, Saborny. Магілёў, Саборны (1943).jpg[edit]

File:Mahiloŭ, Saborny. Магілёў, Саборны (1943).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Višnieŭ, Adviedzinaŭ, Brama. Вішнеў, Адведзінаў, Брама (30.06.1941) (2).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Višnieŭ, Adviedzinaŭ, Brama. Вішнеў, Адведзінаў, Брама (30.06.1941) (2).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Višnieŭ, Adviedzinaŭ, Brama. Вішнеў, Адведзінаў, Брама (30.06.1941) (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Viciebsk, Vialikaja. Віцебск, Вялікая (1941-43).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Viciebsk, Vialikaja. Віцебск, Вялікая (1941-43).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Viciebsk, Vialikaja. Віцебск, Вялікая (1941-43).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sienica, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Сеніца, Петрапаўлаўская (1900).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Sienica, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Сеніца, Петрапаўлаўская (1900).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sienica, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Сеніца, Петрапаўлаўская (1900).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rykonty, Trajecki. Рыконты, Траецкі (J. Bułhak, 1939).jpg[edit]

File:Rykonty, Trajecki. Рыконты, Траецкі (J. Bułhak, 1939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ke an (talk) 05:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Widaw in German, Vilna in Italian, Wilenski in Lithuanian (Belarusian), Wilna in Polish, Vilne in French, Vilna in Latin (V. Coronelli, 1690).jpg[edit]

File:Widaw in German, Vilna in Italian, Wilenski in Lithuanian (Belarusian), Wilna in Polish, Vilne in French, Vilna in Latin (V. Coronelli, 1690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ke an (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Widaw in German, Vilna in Italian, Wilenski in Lithuanian (Belarusian), Wilna in Polish, Vilne in French, Vilna in Latin (V. Coronelli, 1690) (2).jpg[edit]

File:Widaw in German, Vilna in Italian, Wilenski in Lithuanian (Belarusian), Wilna in Polish, Vilne in French, Vilna in Latin (V. Coronelli, 1690) (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ke an (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schamaiten (Samogitien) (D. Schäfer, 1916).jpg[edit]

File:Schamaiten (Samogitien) (D. Schäfer, 1916).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ke an (talk) 20:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Littauischen Sprachgebiets (1876).jpg[edit]

File:Littauischen Sprachgebiets (1876).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ke an (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bieraście, Buh. Берасьце, Буг (H. Vogel, 1915).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bieraście, Buh. Берасьце, Буг (H. Vogel, 1915).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bieraście, Buh. Берасьце, Буг (H. Vogel, 1915).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- Pofka (talk) 13:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stay away from Pofka[edit]

Hi, I suggest you stay away from anything related to Pofka (files and board) for sometimes. Yann (talk) 11:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'd like to do so, but Pofka persistently provokes conflicts including placing deliberate misleading renaming requests (which are clearly against Commons:File renaming) and spreading calumny about me, which still leaves unnoticed and unpunished by administrators. By the way, in this recent case Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Fake renaming, return of the original name according to Commons:File renaming administrator reverting action is required (since there was no obvious error in the filename). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of 6 months[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 6 months for the following reason: Long-term abuse.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A.Savin 02:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I've contributed to the Wikimedia Commons for 14 years with more than 48 000 files uploaded, moreover I'm a bureaucrat of my home Belarusian Wikipedia and now I'm blocked here for "trolling"?! And this so called "trolling" were considered my attempts to ask the community to follow Commons:Policies and guidelines. Is it some kind of twisted gratitude? Since I believe that there are some decent administrator who really care about the project and it's reputation, I ask them to revise this whole situation. If there are any questions regarding any false accusations against me, I can clarify any of them. Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 11:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Unblock reason: "In my opinion one month is enough. Happy editing, but try to avoid controversial topics. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
 (Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ suomi ∙ हिन्दी ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

And I should also clarify, that the following statement by Pofka: "who call Lithuanians as rubbish" [10] is a calumny [11] (I have already asked to stop spreading such calumny about me here and here), which is quite clear even from the diffs provided by the user. I should also clarify that the following accusation against me by Pofka "should not be persecuted for taking actions against aggressive Russian/Belarusian trolls (Russia and Belarus are waging aggressive information war against NATO/Western countries and Ukraine)" is ridiculous, since I'm a creator of such articles in the Belarusian Wikipedia like be-tarask:Расейскае ўварваньне ва Ўкраіну (2022) (2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine), be-tarask:Русіфікацыя Беларусі (Russification of Belarus) and many others like these, and I'm not talking about the well-known fact that Belarusian Wikipedia (be-tarask) does not recognize forced Russification of Belarusian language as well as the Russian occupation of Belarus. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I should also notice, that the initiator of my block is a subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban in the English Wikipedia. And now this user continue to spread blatant calumny [12] about me in Commons:Requests for rights##Kazimier_Lachnovič_(request_for_revoking_filemover_rights). User:SHB2000, User:Kadı, have you ever read Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Yann, violation of Commons:File renaming, threatening by block and other issues with abusing the admin rights? Do you see any evidence of "long-term abuse" there? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:GPSLeo "And the currently banned user moved the files from the Russian to the Belarusian transliteration?" [13]. No, I wasn't blocked for that (and I didn't move the files from the Russian to the Belarusian transliteration). I was blocked for reporting the violation of Commons:File renaming (I hope you read this official guideline) by one of the administrator. To make sure about it you can check my talk page, search for my entries on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, or just directly ask your colleagues who blocked me. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think I understand the general problem. One question: How would you act now if an edit like this [14] would happen again? GPSLeo (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:GPSLeo In conflicts like this in every Wikimedia project (including the Belarusian Wikipedia, where I'm an administrator), I always try to start (or join) discussions with expressing my opinion based on reliable sources in order to find a consensus. And that is exactly what I did in the mentioned case [15]. But I need to point out that sometimes such approach, unfortunately, doesn't work in the Wikimedia Commons: i.e. I tried to discuss inappropriate renaming request here (the opponent, who, by the way, is now under indefinite block for nationalist POV-pushing and personal attacks in the English Wikipedia, joined the discussion only after my report), but even providing the scan from the reliable source didn't prevent the renaming [16]. And even my undisputed request to the administrators was just ignored. So what should I have done in that quite obvious case? And what if the case isn't even obvious? Like here? But that time my not not-so-shy request, as well as not-so-shy discussion, finally succeeded [17]. So did I something wrong in that case? I totally understand that administrators in the Wikimedia Commons are not very suitable for resolving such conflicts. But I'm not definitely the one, who regularly starts such conflicts here: I'm not the one who placed inappropriated renaming requests to the files uploaded by other users, I'm not the one who start edit warring by controversial removing the categories, I'm not the one who try to push renaming of files by their deletion request (!), where the only evidence for that is amateurish original research against professional reliable source. So my answer is that I have chosen and I will always continue to choose civilized discussion hoping to find a consensus (like here with Guccee or like here with Super Dromaeosaurus). But what should I do next if such approach doesn't work again with the same interconnected users (Ke an, Pofka, Cukrakalnis)? What should I do with repeating personal attacks (including slander against me)? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the file names are complicated case. As I can not read Cyrillic I do not feel able to resolve the file naming issue in a proper way. Maybe it could have been a solution combining both names with "name A" - "name B". But in the case I linked there would have been a simple solution changing the "fact" to a "statement" by replacing "The seal was proved to be a falsification by Marian Gumowski" with "The seal is probably a falsification by Marian Gumowski" GPSLeo (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:GPSLeo Yes, finding a reasonable consensus is the best way of resolving any conflict. And, if possible, I always try to suggest such a solution (e.g. like here [18]) or accept the one. In case of file names, I have accepted the solution you mentioned many times (e.g. [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]), even if I'm not very happy with the resulting names. But there I find at least some logic (and therefore good faith) in the naming, as well as I'm considering the great contribution by the user in the topic (much bigger then mine was). But this case is about variant (in question of file name language, even though it is clearly stated, that "Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages"), but still correct names. In case of Commons:Deletion requests/Files with clearly misleading names I can not find any logic in pushing renaming with the incorrect name, as well as I can't find there any clear and sound arguments for such renaming against the reliable source. And the mentioned by me case was also about pushing renaming with incorrect name (a name against the reliable source provided). In my opinion, toleration of renaming with incorrect names and file descriptions in the Wikimedia Commons can lead to discrediting the entire project. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me for jumping in but following up on my comment at ANU, how does diffs of other people doing file renames support you "accepting a solution"? There are no edits by you showing actual acceptance. Is the fact that you didn't fight it even more after evidence that you accept things? If you are unblocked, are you still going to be looking for more evidence to bring up the same fight? "I could have kept going after every discussion I lost but I didn't" isn't a good answer. Can you post a list of which discussions you have lost you actually accept now? You are free to keep on disputing them after you are unblocked because no one can hold you to that but it would be nice to know that there has been some resolution in something. I'm not an admin here so it doesn't even matter but I hope my questions are illustrative. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are you trying to make me to stop disputing anything here that are against Commons:Policies and guidelines? In order to "loose" there should be a fair play, i.e. all parties should play by the rules and in case of their clear violation any party should be treated equally. For the record, the situations I fought was not only about filenames, but it was also about descriptions of the files (including the mentioned conflict with Ymblanter as well as the last conflict with Pofka). In any case, if systematic violation of Commons:File renaming is something widely acceptable according to the current practice, it should be stated in Commons:File renaming, otherwise it can be interpreted as a public deception (b.t.w. I noticed that User:Roy17 has faced a similar issue Commons:Village_pump#Pointless_file_renames). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to clarify the statement of Ymblanter [24]. Yes, we had a conflict (and I was not the one who started this conflict) about their file description censorship as well as file renaming (the user believe that the original Belarusian language filename and filedescription are offensive, but according to reliable sources they are not offensive in the Belarusian language), which was discussed widely and the Ymblanter's point of view found no neccessary support. Moreover, they failed with their attempts in the English Wikipedia ("where harassment is not tolerated" in contrast to the Commons community, that is "completely disfunctional as far as anything beyond dealing with the clear-cut violations such as uploading of obviously copyrighted files is concerned" — according to Ymblanter [25]), where the uninvolved administrator characterized their accusation of me as "serious misquote". But it didn't stop them from haunting and slandering me in the Wikidata), where they failed again. But I notice something quite similar in behavior of Ymblanter and Pofka towards me: the first one is slandering me by "who called me "a Nazi" in public" [26] and the second one is slandering me with "who call Lithuanians as rubbish" [27]. And before the "second chance" (and here I for sure agree with Ymblanter that removing the filemover is not a good idea, that just makes my contribution here much less efficient) could be possibly granted to me I'd like to know how can I stop slandering of me here, as well as the proper way to report violation of any official guideline without being called a "troll" and get blocked? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very well, first they insult me by calling a troll, then they block me for reporting abuse, eventually they revoke my filemover rights [28] even until the end of the corresponding discussion. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • About this Ymblanter's comment [29]. Russian and Belarusian contributors are not treated equally here. Actually, those Russians contributors (and user Лобачев Владимир is not one of such Russian contributors), who spread ideas close to what Russian officials are saying now about so called "Ukrainian/Belarusian nationalists" (in order to justify terror of Ukrainians/Belarusians and one element of such terrorism is Russification, i.e. ethnocide of Ukrainians/Belarusians) are quite tolerated here. Let me provide some evidence about Ymblanter: 1) definite prejudge to Belarusian language ("Russian is still the mothertongue of 95% of the population of Belarus" [30] while it is easy to find in w:en:Languages of Belarus that the statement about 95% of the population with the native Russian has nothing in common with the reality); 2) insulting the community of Belarusian Wikipedia (be-tarask is a project usurped by a group of ultra-nationalists [31]); 3) insulting the Belarusian language by comparing with Pidgin as well as Belarusian scientist by comparing them to KKK members ([32]). So, does the community support spreading of Russian propaganda here as well as Russification of Belarusians (in the same way like Russia has been trying to russify Ukrainians)? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just in case if someone doesn't understand what is going about: «[In Soviet Ukraine] first place went to "peaceful" denationalization and Russification, or the policy of ethnocide» (FBIS Report: Soviet Union. 1991. P. 51.), «However, Russification in Belarus (ethnocide) continues» (Historical dictionary of Belarus, a part of Historical Dictionaries series, by Dr. Jan Zaprudnik and Dr. Vitali Silitski. P. XXXI), «In the Russian Empire and then the former Soviet Union , ethnocide took the form of Russification» p. 89 (Ethnic Relations by David Levinson, Ph.D., is a cultural anthropologist and partner in Berkshire Reference Works. Previously, he was vice president for the Human Relations Area Files at Yale University). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вуйвічы, Сербаў, памылка 1912[edit]

Гэты здымак зроблены ў суседняй вёсцы Мясяцiчы, выпраўце, калi ласка, бо я не ведаю, як гэта зрабiць. Магчыма, некаторыя iншыя старыя здымкi Сербава, атрыбутаваныя як Вуйвiчы, таксама тычацца Мясяцiч.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vujvi%C4%8Dy,_Illinskaja._%D0%92%D1%83%D0%B9%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%87%D1%8B,_%D0%86%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_(I._Sierba%C5%AD,_1912).jpg 185.128.201.27 13:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Дзякую, што зьвярнулі ўвагу на памылку (сапраўды, тая ж царква з File:Мясяцічы. Царква (01).jpg). На жаль, на гэты момант мяне тут несправядліва, з поўным парушэньнем усіх дэкляраваных у Вікісховішчы правілаў заблякавалі на паўгода (фактычна за тое, што я беларус і не згаджаюся з тым, што беларусы — гэта расейцы, а Беларусь — гэта Расея), таму не магу выканаць вашу просьбу зараз. Але спадзяюся, што ў мяне атрымаецца дамагчыся справядлівасьці і такая магчымасьць усё ж зьявіцца, тады адразу ж выпраўлю памылку. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Хіба дзіўна, што сам Сербаў пасьлядоўна падпісваў усе тыя здымкі як «Вуйвічы». Можа, раней царква ўсё ж адміністрацыйна належала да Вуйвічаў або прыход называўся Вуйвіцкім, хоць і месьціўся у Мясяцічах? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Яшчэ і Poddębski ў 1936 падпісаў "Вуйвічы" (гл. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vujvi%C4%8Dy._%D0%92%D1%83%D0%B9%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%87%D1%8B_(H._Podd%C4%99bski,_1936)_(3).jpg )
Трэба разбірацца. 185.128.201.27 15:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Магчыма, усё ж такі перабудова ў Вуйвічах. На здымках 1936 г. добра бачныя могілкі, якія ў тым месцы толькі ў Вуйвічах ёсць. Але такая копія царквы ў Мясяцічах, здаецца, не вельмі верагодная...
Будзем разбірацца. Пакуль дакладнага адказу няма. 185.128.201.27 16:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazimier Jan Sapieha. Казімер Ян Сапега (1750).jpg[edit]

File:Kazimier Jan Sapieha. Казімер Ян Сапега (1750).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Seva Seva (talk) 13:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kazimier_Lachnovič&oldid=855384509"