User talk:Torsade de Pointes/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Ik kan me niet goed meer herinneren wat daar verkeerd is gelopen. Wellicht heb ik vergeten te vermelden dat het een 'eigen foto' is (het was namelijk het eerste plaatje dat ik ooit op commons heb gezet). Vermoedelijk heb ik er toen niets beter op gevonden dan dezelfde foto nogmaals te uploaden onder een andere bestandsnaam: Geboortehuis Conscience.JPG. Het plaatje staat onder die nieuwe naam in fr.wikipedia en nl.wikipedia. Het bestand met naam Maison_natale_Conscience_Anvers.JPG kan dan gerust gewist worden. Mijn excuses! -- Torsade de Pointes (talk) 19:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
categorieën
Hallo, kan je in het vervolg ook de gepaste categorieën toevoegen aan je uploads? Zo is het ook mogelijk voor anderen om je foto's terug te vinden. Groeten --LimoWreck (talk) 21:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
OK, ik ga proberen erachter te komen hoe dat moet.-- Torsade de Pointes (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Wannes Beeld Elcker-Ik1.JPG is uncategorized since 21 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Musée Magritte1.JPG is uncategorized since 4 April 2009.
- Image:Chalencon (Haute-Loire) Château chapelle1.JPG was uncategorized on 26 October 2009.
D'accord et merci ! Je vais en tenir compte. Torsade de Pointes (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Hommage Wannes.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--BrokenSphere 00:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Altenwerder Plan1975.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--NNW (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Categorisering
Hallo, Torsade de Pointes, je leert al snel je mooie foto's te categoriseren, merk ik. Je moet nog wel leren category redundancy te vermijden.
Bijvoorbeeld, als de serie Files kerk van Polignac in de Categorie:Church of Polignac staan, en deze kategorie staat in Category:Polignac, dan krijgen de Files zelf niet meer de category:Polignac. Zie bijgaand plaatje.
Dan nog dit: als je meerdere foto's van een object maakt, is het handig om een aparte categorie aan te maken. Ik heb als voorbeeld voor je aangemaakt Category:Château de Rochebaron met drie bovenliggende categorieën. Heb je in de toekomst nog vragen, stel ze me gerust.
Prettige feestdagen. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Brrr, klinkt een beetje moeilijk.
Heb uw commentaar 2 of 3 maal moeten lezen, maar ik snap het nu wel, denk ik. Bedankt voor uw aanwijzingen.Torsade de Pointes (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Dear Commons user,
We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français ! In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français. We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
File:Timmermans Volders.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sorry, but Belgium has no FOP. You might ask the sculptor (born 1960) for a permission. Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Hamme_Monument_De_Pillecyn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ComMonster (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the new category! :)
Thanks for the new category, I saw you already using it! That helps a lot! I love the pictures!! :) --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Wannes Beeld Elcker-Ik1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Alfred Ost Paarden.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Laatste Avondmaal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Loteling.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Vluchtelingen2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Vluchtelingen1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Vluchtelingen3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Ost Watersnood.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.120.34.180 17:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Montpeyroux Plan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Pour info
Bonjour,
Un auteur américain cite votre photo sur sa page facebook (car le château a inspiré le décor d'épisodes de ses livres) lien.
Bonne journée, Cédric Boissière (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Majas Composition.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Majas Composition.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 21:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Besse Lac Pavin8.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
150.135.173.143 23:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Lodewijk Van Berckenlaan n°144 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Karel Coggestraat n°45 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Karel Coggestraat n°45 (2) .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Strijdhoflaan n°55 (1).psd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Strijdhoflaan n°55 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Berchem Strijdhoflaan n°91.psd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Borgerhout Sterrenborgstraat n°6.JPG
- File:Borgerhout Van Hersteenstraat n°12 .JPG
- File:Borgerhout Vosstraat n°8.JPG
- File:Deurne Boekenberglei n°265.JPG
- File:Deurne Gemeentehuis1.JPG
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk10.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk11.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk12.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk13.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk14.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk15.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk16.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk17.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk18.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk19.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk2.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk20.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk21.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk22.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk23.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk24.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk25.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk26.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk28.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk29.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk3.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk30.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk31.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk32.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk33.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk34.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk35.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk36.JPG
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Borgerhout Wolfjagerslei n°18 (2).JPG
- File:Borgerhout Wolfjagerslei n°18 (3).JPG
- File:Borgerhout Wolfjagerslei n°18 (4).JPG
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege11.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege12.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege13.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege14.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege15.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege16.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege17.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege18.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege19.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege2.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege20.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege21.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege22.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege23.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege24.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege25.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege26.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege27.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege28.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege29.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege3.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege30.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege31.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege32.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege33.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege34.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege35.JPG
- File:Ost Xaveriuscollege36.JPG
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 5.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 5.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 6.JPG
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 7.JPG
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 8.JPG
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Pacto de San José sello 1959.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 5.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 5.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 6.JPG
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 7.JPG
- File:Massignieu-de-Rives Sillins 8.JPG
No required license templates were detected at this file page. You need to add a license template (like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} or {{PD-self}}). Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page or ask for help on Commons:Bistro. --Jarekt (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Guillermo Furlong sello.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk38.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk39.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk4.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk40.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk41.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk42.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk43.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk44.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk45.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk46.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk47.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk48.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk5.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk6.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk7.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk8.JPG
- File:Deurne Unitaswijk9.JPG
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)