User talk:Ulflarsen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.

EugeneZelenko 02:43, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Ulf, I would appreciate if you would contact me regarding the images Image:LTTE_Black_Tiger_Picture_Gallery_2004.jpg and Image:LTTE_Black_Tiger_Commemoration_Nelliady_2004.jpg I need to know if I have interpreted your copyright notice correctly. Please check this page: http://www.war-memorial.net/mem_det.asp?ID=184 my email address is [1]

Brunberg

Red Cross images[edit]

You tagged a number of images with "Courtesy Swedish Red Cross". Does that mean that somebody at the Red Cross gave permission to publish the photos? Regards, Thuresson 20:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an email to the Swedish Red Cross and got the pictures by mail, and we are able to use them. I have used several in the Norwegian article about the "White buses" operation, and will translate the same article to English and use them there as well. Hope this answers your question. Ulflarsen 15:16, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VTS Horten Norway 2006.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 22:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atomium[edit]

Hi. Saw your message at Lviatour's page. Pictures of the Atomium are currently not available due to Belgian copyright issues. Sorry -- Lycaon 13:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have the authorization to publish two images, but the rights are too restrictive to publish on Wikipédia! --Luc Viatour 12:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Tall_ship_Christian_Radich_under_sail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

le Korrigan bla 20:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I did not mean any offence by putting the image on the deletion request, and I'm sorry you saw it this way ; it is commonplace to do this if there is a doubt on the image license. In this case, nothing could prove that there was a permission, hence my deletion proposal (which is merely a call for proofs).
As I mentioned on the discussion page, could you please copy this permission, so that we can be sure that everything is granted (in particular commercial use and modification) ? Thanks a lot, and sorry for the trouble. Regards, le Korrigan bla 08:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, will dig it up and copy it there. Ulflarsen 10:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 16:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

I really dont know why this pic came up without a license, I have uploaded quite a few others, without problems, and I am quite sure I selected license when I did the upload. Anyway, it is fixed now, and if there should be any questions regarding my pics I may as well be contacted by mail or to my user account on Norwegian Bokmål/Riksmål. Ulflarsen 12:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:German_WW2_Tanker_Altmark_in_Norway.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 01:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you just as well delete it. I got the picture from the Norwegian War Museum, from the lead librarian there, but I am not sure that he really knows what it means to hand over a picture to us, so the correct must - alas, be to delete it. Ulflarsen 05:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Advarsel
Denne filen kan bli slettet.
Takk for at du lastet opp Image:Svedish_Red_Cross_buses_in_Germany_WW2,_possibly_near_Friedrichsruh.jpg. Denne filen mangler informasjon om tillatelsen. Det er angitt kilde, men det finnes ikke dokumentasjon på at opphavsperson/rettighetshaver har frigitt filen under lisensen som er angitt. Vennligst oppgi lenke til en nettside hvor lisensen er angitt, eller send en epost med kopi av skriftlig tillatelse fra opphavsperson/rettighetshaver til OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Dersom tillatelsen ikke dokumenteres kan filen bli hurtigslettet etter syv dager. På forhånd takk.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Advarsel
Denne filen kan bli slettet.
Takk for at du lastet opp Image:Swedish_Red_Cross_men_outside_their_buses.jpg. Denne filen mangler informasjon om tillatelsen. Det er angitt kilde, men det finnes ikke dokumentasjon på at opphavsperson/rettighetshaver har frigitt filen under lisensen som er angitt. Vennligst oppgi lenke til en nettside hvor lisensen er angitt, eller send en epost med kopi av skriftlig tillatelse fra opphavsperson/rettighetshaver til OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Dersom tillatelsen ikke dokumenteres kan filen bli hurtigslettet etter syv dager. På forhånd takk.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have forwarded the permission from the Swedish Red Cross to OTRS, hope this solves the case so the pictures will not be deleted. Ulflarsen (talk) 07:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What were you doing that far out into the Atlantic? -- Denelson83 (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The position is north and east, not north and west, so it's safely in the Oslo fjord. Ulflarsen (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ulflarsen!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bild uppladdad av dig i tidning[edit]

Se här. /Haxpett (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Your dupe-taggings[edit]

Hi Ulflarsen, this " A much better scan of the same motive has been uploaded, no use of having this inferior scan" is not sufficient for tagging duplicates, as you leave the unnecessary work of searching which might be the other image you are refering to, to the admin. Please put the full filename of the better image into the message. --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They can just be deleted, no need for more tagging, better versions has been uploaded and can be found here. Ulflarsen (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but no. It is my and any admins duty to really check and compare both versions of a "duplicate" speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok - no problem for me, keep the files if you feel for it. Ulflarsen (talk) 13:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Front page of the Norwegian magazine Folk er Folk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jespinos (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to add coordinates to pics[edit]

This is a short overview of how to add coordinates to image files for dummies and/or 50+:

  • Put in raw coordinates while uploading, that is latitude/longitude
  • Finish the upload
  • Find the place in Wikipedia
  • Go to the coordinates page Geohack where you find lat/long in decimal
  • Copy the approximate lat/long to the fields in the picture you have uploaded

It is not perfect, you don't get the excact position, but its better than nothing and as no help seems to be readily available I guess it is the easiest way to do it. Ulflarsen (talk) 14:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TrendsGlobalEmissions.png[edit]

Hi Ulf

No problem. I am a little bit busy at the moment with my day work, but I will have a look and create a Norwegian version with your text. I will let you know once I upload it so you can check if you are happy with it. Regards --Basquetteur (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Best regards, Ulflarsen (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulf

As discussed, I have made the graph. It is now uploaded here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TrendsGlobalEmissions-no.png. I hope it is as you expected and is correct. If there is anything you would like to further edit, please tell me. Regards, --Basquetteur (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I have replaced the English language version with the one in Norwegian! :-) Best regards, Ulflarsen (talk) 11:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Movies from south, yearly event in Oslo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ulflarsen has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LuiCJ (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hungarian girls porn[edit]

Ulf, the two Hungarian girls you were making out with are very hot. It would be nice if you could possibly post pictures of you fucking the dark skin one. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8807:6400:6A7:B83F:8126:E734:15FD (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen with two girls 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

217.55.231.239 19:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veroforus (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user was featured in an online gallery space[edit]

This user's photo Ulf Larsen and teen 01 was featured in the online gallery space Meditations on Pornography.

I'm making a note of this here because although this user's contributions are pornographic in nature, they hold cultural relevance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwonRael (talk • contribs) 09:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing me. Ulflarsen (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ulf Larsen and ex-girlfriend 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ulf Larsen and ex-girlfriend 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Matthias Winkelmann.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, FredWalsh (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migebert (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.249.122.242 15:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Dear Ulf, according to our correspondence in OTRS ticket#2020102510004811, I issued a delete request. Mussklprozz (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To user Mussklprozz: Okey Dokey. I have started a thread about it on the Village pump. Any discussion about it should be taken there. Ulflarsen (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File talk:German invasion of Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and France in May 1940. The planned positions of the Allied Armies. Norwegian version.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dymetrios (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kjetil Wiedsvang 02.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kjetil Wiedsvang 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]