User talk:Caspiax

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Cathy Freeman[edit]

Thanks for uploading this image.

It seems to be a copyrights problems, because cathy freeman's web page doesn't clears the copyrights matter. So it can't be included in commons.

--Sgiraldoa 03:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Cathy Freeman[edit]

Jag väntar på tillstånd från Cathy Freeman, vad gäller hennes personliga och hennes firmas bilder. Det brukar gå, men tyvärr är väntetiden alltid lång. Synd, eftersom fler känner denna friidrottare till utseendet än till namnet. /Caspiax 2007-01-25 05:49:36


Image Tagging Image:Religions-schema_3_former.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Religions-schema_3_former.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I HAVE created this media myself, and it's not a copy of any existing diagram. --Caspiax 08:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kent_Lundholm.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kent_Lundholm.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 09:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Why can't you send this kind of information to my e-mail adress. It's not possible to keep in mind all images one has uploaded. This photo of Kent Lundholm was owned by Kent Lundholm, and he has given free permission for the human kind to do what ever they want with the photo. His e-mail is kent(at)kentlundholm.com. Please, upload the image again. --Caspiax 06:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Shoghi_Effendi_in_Oxford.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shoghi_Effendi_in_Oxford.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 09:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted contents[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Caspiax,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore had to be deleted:

Non-commercial images

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on the Wikimedia Commons: "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how the Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. / Fred J 14:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

This photo is very old (1910 - 1918) and nobody owns it. It has been published in several books, but the books don't point out a licence holder or copyright. --Caspiax 14:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bahíyyih Khánum-1.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bahíyyih Khánum-1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jeff3000 21:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


Image:Shoghi Effendi in Oxford.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Shoghi Effendi in Oxford.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jeff3000 21:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Michael.Piller,jpg.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


Image:Marleymuseum.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Pictures that are in a category X which itself is a subcategory of Y, should not be placed in category Y. The Category:Bahá'u'lláh category is already part of the Category:Bahá'í category, and so images that are in the Category:Bahá'u'lláh category should not also be placed in the top level category. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Draxing by Báb.gif[edit]

In the form contained in that image, the diagram seems more likely to come from a work of early 20th-century esoteric Christian-influenced mysticism or Theosophy, than to be drawn by the Báb (who died in 1850 without any special knowledge of English, and who does not seem to have been heavily influenced by specifically Christian beliefs and terminology). The only Bahai influence I can detect in the diagram is the nine-pointed star... AnonMoos (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gene Roddenberry2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Bilder på Höga kusten[edit]

Hej, bilderna du laddat upp av Höga kusten är med all sannolikhet inte tillåtna att ha här. Visst står det att bilderna "får användas fritt". Det innebär dock oftast att de får användas i pressen, och aldrig kommersiellt. Du bör maila de som ligger bakom sidan och kontrollera så att "fritt" även gäller kommersiellt. Om detta inte görs kommer bilderna förmodligen att raderas. Jag kommer anmäla dem till radering, om svar inte dyker upp. /grillo (talk) 19:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Hejsan, jag har lite frågor angående dina bilder från Höga kusten, alltså highcoast.net. Det står att Bilderna ovan är skyddade av upphovsrätten.. Därifrån har du tagit Image:Höga kusten4.jpeg, som alltså är upphovsrättsskyddad. Antar att de bilder som du syftar på är fria är de som finns här? Det finns vissa svagheter i fotografens formulering vad gäller att bilderna får användas fria, eftersom ingen licens används. Men jag tänker inte anmäla dem som ofria, men bilden jag länkar till ovan bör nog raderas, tror jag. //moralist (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Jag har funderat en hel del på detta med bilder på Wikipedia. Dels borde vi dra igång en egen fotokampanj, mer omfattande än dem som genomförts tidigare. Vidare borde vi se till att samma publiceringsregler gäller inom EU-området; att få sådana friheter som wikipedisterna i USA har kan vi nog bara drömma om. Dessutom undrar jag lite kring svårigheterna med att få sina egna bilder godkända för Wikipedia. Nu har jag i ett flertal fall fått bilder som jag själv producerat (fotograferat eller tecknat) borttagna. Om jag inte är inne på Wiki på ett tag kan detta hända, och så vitt jag kan förstå hänger det ihop med att jag, liksom de flesta, skriver och fotograferar under pseudonym.
Det kan finnas starka skäl till att en wikipedist inte vill avslöja vem som döljer sig bakom aliaset, men hur gör man då om man är en etablerad illustratör och har framställt en fri bild för Wikipedia? Måste den som exempelvis har aliaset "Wikihappyone" – som i själva verket är en professionell illustratör vid namn Jenny Waahl som har copyright på en bild trots att den publicerats i några tidningar – låtsas som att hon fått bilden av sig själv genom att skicka en kopia på ett brev från Jenny Waal till Wikihappyone, genom vilket hon överlåter bilden för fri publicering på Wikipedia?
Jag har vänner som förutom att vara yrkesfotografer, f.d. journalister eller proffessionella illustratörer även är flyktingar från bl.a. Iran, och som i vissa fall konverterat från islam. Jag tror inte att någon som inte sett dem i en hotfull situation kan förstå hur rädda de är för att agenter från Iran ska få tag i dem eller deras familjer. Den vanlige svensken läser ibland om vad som har hänt utan att förstå vad som har hänt eftersom rapporteringen i våra tidningar inskränker sig till texter som: "Man knivmördad i gångtunnel", "Styckad kropp funnen", "16-åriga Mona bortförd till Iran. Föräldrarna vägrar (dvs vågar inte) uppge var hon är och varför". Att kunna skriva och illustrera under pseudonym är en nödvändighet för dessa människor. --Caspiax (talk) 10:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Hej, jag förstår absolut vad du menar. Men om du publicerar bilder på andra webbplatser under ditt riktiga namn måste du nog skriva att du har tagit bilderna och att du publicerar dem i en fri licens (gärna på båda platserna) för att få använda dem på wikipedia. Jag är dock inte så jätteinsatt i hur sånt här fungerar, är inte på långa vägar proffesionell bildkonstnär. Men jag ber folk som vet mer kolla på ditt inlägg. Med vänliga hälsningar, moralist (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Om bilden har publicerats utanför Wikipedia först utan en fri licens måste ett "permission" finnas med bilden när den laddas upp på Commons. Om det är din egen bild men du inte vill länka den till ditt namn finns det två saker du kan göra. Det ena är att du sätter en fri licens på bilden på källsidan (t.ex. cc-by-sa) då kan du sedan ladda upp den här utan problem. alternativ två är att du skriver ett mail som förklarar situationen till "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org". Information som du inte vill göra allmän kommer då bara att vara tillgänglig för de få som har tillgång till OTRS verksamheten.
Vad gäller standardisering av upphovsrätt etc. har det både sina för och nackdelar. "sådana friheter som wikipedisterna i USA har" är inget som är värt att eftersträva, statens bilder är visserligen fria men allt annat är nu skyddat i 95år vilket är 25 år längre än i Europa (skyller på Disney). Även inom EU-området har en sådan standardisering. Som kan läsas på Template talk:PD-Sweden-photo har Sverige redan gått med på ett EU direktiv om en sådan standardisering. Det skulle betyda att alla bilder som i dagsläget är fria p.g.a. Template:PD-Sweden-photo skulle bli retroaktivt ofria igen. Som "tur" är så är Eu-direktiv inte lagstadgande i sig utan kräver att medlemsländerna skapar egna lagar som lever upp till det som gåtts med på. I dagsläget har Sverige (vad jag vet) inte gjort något sådant.
För att återgå till bilderna från www.highcoast.net måste du skicka dem ett e-mail där du ber dem klargöra vad de menar med "fritt användande" specifikt måste de godkänna att de tillåter att "vem som helst får använda bilderna för vad som helst inklusive för kommersiell ändamål samt för att skapa härledda verk" När du får ett svar som styrker detta måste du vidarebefordra det till "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" samt nämna vilka bilder det gäller. Om ett sådant klargörande inte inkommer kan bilderna tyvärr inte användas. / Lokal_Profil 17:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Jag har nu märkt upp bilderna (File:Höga_kusten4.jpeg, File:Höga_kusten_vy.jpeg, File:World_heritage_Höga_kusten2.jpg) med "tillstånd saknas"-mallen så att ärendet inte glöms bort. Så fort ett e-mail har skickats till OTRS kan bilderna märkas om med {{OTRS pending}}. /Lokal_Profil 17:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Jag har återgått din tillägg av Bahá'í byggnader kategori till många sidor. A "Bahá'í byggnader" kategorin är ganska vag, och alla sidor som du lagt till den kategori som redan hade mer specifika kategorier som Category:Seat of the Universal House of Justice. Kategoriindelning bör vara specifika, och bilder i vissa kategorier bör inte placeras i kategorier som de själva innehålla underkategorier. Till exempel en bild av en kyrka bör inte placeras i en av "Bahá'í byggnader" kategorin eftersom det är själva i Category:Bahá'í House of Worship, som själv är i Category:Bahá'í places kategori som är som Bahá'í byggnader kategori. Om du vill kan du placera andra kategorier i en Bahá'í byggnader kategori. Hälsningar,

I have reverted your addition of the Baha'i buildings category to many pages. A "Baha'i buildings" category is pretty vague, and all of the pages you added the category to already had more specific categories such as Category:Seat of the Universal House of Justice. Categorization should be specific, and images in specific categories should not be placed in categories which they themselves include the subcategories. For example a picture of a House of Worship should not be placed in a the "Baha'i buildings" category because it is itself in the Category:Bahá'í House of Worship which is itself in Category:Bahá'í places category which is like the Baha'i buildings category. If you wish you can place other categories in a Baha'i buildings category. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC) ---

Bilder rörande bahá'í är ändå ganska få till antalet. Jag tyckte det var anmärkningsvärt att jag inte kom upp i 90 ens. En anledning till att jag testade att lägga bilderna i en gemensam kategori var tidigare bökigheter med att hitta bilder att illustrera med. Men jag har fortfarande svårt för kategorisökningen, som den funkar nu. Jag har för mig att det fanns en massa listor på Wikipedia förr, men många av dessa har raderats. Om jag bara minns förnamnet på en amerikansk skådelspelare så kan jag numera inte hitta personen (eller vet inte hur jag ska göra för att hitta personen). Bahá'í-byggnaderna är få, och rent teologiskt så tror jag att de alla betraktas som "Tillbedjans Hus", även om vissa är gravmonument och pilgrimsmål. Några kyrkor, tempel eller moskéer finns ju inte. I grunden är varenda byggnad öppen för varende människa på jorden att komma in i och be på vilket språk de vill utifrån vilken religion de har. Dessa Tillbedjans hus tillåter t.o.m. ateister att gifta sig där. Även bibliotek, undervisningscenter och Universella rättvisans hus är byggnader som är "Tillbedjans hus", men det kan av praktiska skäl vara olämpligt att hålla ett bröllop i ett forskningsbibliotek. Med Vänliga Hälsningar --Caspiax (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


Om ni läser http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Categories ni se att filer ska placeras i den mest specifika kategorin: "The general rule is always place an image in the most specific categories, and not in the levels above those" Observera att formuleringen anger "mest specifika kategorin. Eftersom kategorierna finns redan inom andra kategorier, användare kan alltid hitta sidor genom att gå via kategori träd och bilder bör inte alla placeras i en högre kategori. Hälsningar -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


Åh vad jag önskar att jag finge åka på en weekendkurs angående detta och alla andra problem med illustrationer på Wikipedia/media. Hur söker jag Clark Gable respektive Cary Grant om jag har svårt att skilja mellan de två och inte minns hur de stavas, inte minns när och var de är födda, inte minns vilka filmer de varit med i? Och var finns den där kategorisökningsroboten som skulle införas? Med Vänliga Hälsningar --Caspiax (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


Det är acutally helt enkelt. När du skriver ut "Clark Gabl" i Commons sökadressen det ger dig förslag rätt som du skriver det, så du behöver inte rätt stavning. Även om du inte välja förslag och stava det fel, det ger dig aa förslaget efter det faktum som i http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=clark+gabl&go=Go
När det gäller Bahá'í kategorier, det finns massor av omdirigeringar finns att leda dig till första sidan (så att stavningen är inte en fråga) som leder till alla relevanta kategorier, och det är mycket enkelt och intuitivt att gå igenom kategorin träd som står på Category:Bahá'í_Faith, och det är mycket mer intuitivt att ha en hel hög med bilder som inte är förknippade med en enorm kategori. Det är vad Commons politiska sidan stater och det är definitivt det lättaste sättet att hitta bilder.
Om du vill ha en Bahá'í byggnader kategori, det rätta sättet är att lägga till andra underkategorier till det, inte lägga hundratals bilder till det individuellt. Hälsningar -- Jeff3000 (talk) 00:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:RastaAfricaPic.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RastaAfricaPic.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:RastaAfricaPic.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Sizzla[edit]

Please remove the picture immediately. You dont habve the rights on this picture! It is not taken by you.


File:PeterTosh78Cambridge.jpg[edit]

Hi, this file is a derivative of another work, and is not used anywhere. It is also inaccurately named. It was taken in Cardiff, not Cambridge.

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PeterTosh78Cambridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--timd (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

If it's not Cambridge, I think it must be Leeds, but I can't remember. I was 15 that year, and Tosh wasn't particularly well known in Scandinavia. We was there for football (soccer), and my older brother wanted desperately to see a show with the new band Steel Pulse from Birmingham. So you are right, it can't be Cambridge. The trip to England for six nights and entrance to two soccer matches was the first prize in a football knowledge competition arranged by the Saturday afternoon television soccer show sv:Tipsextra for soccer lovers and people who uses to play football coupon. The image is a derivate of course, an it's from my brothers camera. He and the older fellows were too drunken to use the camera, and I think that Steel Pulse may have been pre-concert band. This was 30 years ago. I got the analog tape and some others at home, and I am willing to send the one with Tosh to Wikimedia Commons for an analyze. Which is the right address for a package and what must I do to prevent stealing? Does Commons have an insurance for this or must I get one? --Caspiax (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
No, it was Cardiff. I took the photo myself. See File:PeterToshWithRobbieShakespeare1978.jpg -- timd (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:PeterTosh83Amsterdam.jpg[edit]

Sorry, but an image derived from a video is still copyright, not your own work. See the guidance on the upload page:

* Works which contain other copyrighted works (derivative works) - these are not permitted, so don't upload them!
  eg: Screenshots of TV shows, movies, DVDs, and software. 


Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PeterTosh83Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--timd (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


File:URH08 - Farzam Arbab, Kiser Barnes, Peter Khan, Hooper Dunbar, Firaydoun Javaheri, Paul Lample, Payman Mohajer, Shahriar Razavi, and Gustavo Correa.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:URH08 - Farzam Arbab, Kiser Barnes, Peter Khan, Hooper Dunbar, Firaydoun Javaheri, Paul Lample, Payman Mohajer, Shahriar Razavi, and Gustavo Correa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Not free enough. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marley Grona Lund 1978.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marley Grona Lund 1978.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marley Grona Lund 1978.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 08:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Marley at Gröna Lund[edit]

Hi there! I saw you have uploaded material of Bob Marley's performances at Stockholm's Gröna Lund in 1977 and 1978. Is there any possibility for you to send me some of the photos (or even of the video clips by Lasse Lysberg)? Would be great to see them! Thanks in advance & greetings! - CdaMVvWgS (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Caspiax!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Visst ligger den under bahá'í-litteratur? Men jag minns inte om det var jag som lade den där. Fick tidigare kritik för att jag skapade för många kategorier :-) nu för få ... finns det någon tumregel? Detta med bilder är det absolut svåraste som finns i hela wiki-världen. För det första är det svårt rent tekniskt att ladda upp en bild. För det andra är instruktionerna om licenser och liknande skrivna på ett tekniskt språk som bara en bråkdel av användarna förstår. Som jag ser det är det ett sätt att utestänga människor, och jag förstår inte varför inte varför sådana metoder är tillåtna här, där andemeningen är eller bör vara det motsatta. För det tredje stjäl vissa bilder av mig (och säkert av andra) genom att hoppa fram och påstå att det är de som tagit bilden som jag alltså tagit. Detta är samma slags människor som skriver s.k. "Nigeriabrev" eller skickar bluffakturor till kommuner och småföretag. Det är skrattretande ibland, men djupt tragiskt. Jag tog en bild av en kompis som är en halvkänd författare för några år sedan. Sedan avsade jag mig alla rättigheter, lämnade licensen fri, och laddade upp bilden på Wimimedia commons. Genast tycks det ha dykt upp en jeppe som hävdade att han tagit bilden. Och det räcker. Några veckor senare var den bild jag tagit och laddat upp borttagen. Det gick snabbt, jag missade en diskussion som inte var någon diskussion, och sedan ägde jeppen bilden som jag släppt fri. Är det så att man ska ge upp sin anonymitet och lägga in sitt riktiga namn när man laddar upp bilder? Jag har många kilometer band med film, tagna innan den digitala tekniken kom, på olika monument, världsartister som Ultravox, The Police, Elvis Costello, Jokkmokks-Jocke, Manfred Mann, Gary Glitter, The Osmonds, Rolling Stones, Mirjam Makeba, Peter Tosh, Ronnie Pettersson, Ricky Brusch m.fl. Det tar en hel helg att skapa några vettiga bilder (materialet är gammalt). Sedan går det några veckor, och så påstår nån att jag inte har tagit bilden. Oftast missar jag det, ibland ser jag det först ett år senare att bilden är bortplockad. I en diskussion som jag deltog i 2006 nånting så hävdade någon wikipedia-administratör att jag inte har några rättigheter alls eftersom wikipedia inte har några regler. Det är... ja, vad ska man säga? Många bryr sig nog inte om att ladda upp bilder, och jag förstår varför? --Caspiax (talk) 03:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC) ... Zappa också, jag har mycket film på Frank Zappa. Det är sånt som kommer att kastas när jag dör. Vilket slöseri.

File:Bahaullah BlackWhite.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahaullah BlackWhite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláh 1868.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláh 1868.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tomajok (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Port Arthur Norberg.jpg[edit]

Hej. Filen File:Port Arthur Norberg.jpg som du laddade upp som en del av Wiki Loves Monuments saknar ett giltigt id-numer samt verkar inte överensstämma med något av objekten på listan. Av denna anledning har jag plockat bort bilden från tävlingen. OM du har några frågor/kommentarer så ställ dem antingen här eller på min diskussionssida. /Lokal_Profil 22:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Det samam verkar vara sant för File:Timladan i Norberg.jpg. Var såg du att denna fanns med i bebyggelseregistret? /Lokal_Profil 22:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Caspiax,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Bonjour, Caspiax,

i' m writing a book (160 pages, 300 pictures) in France about hemp agriculture…(alimentation, paper, textile, ropes, bio-dièsel, construction, isolation, médecine, religion, etc...) Is it possible to illustrate it with the picture of Bob Marley, i've found it on the page http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Bob_Marley_emancipated_from_mental_slavery_1.jpg

Is this picture in the public domain ? Or can i have your authorisation to use it…  Have you maybe an high résolution version ? (i will thanks you under this photo) Thank you for your help…  ----- (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


Selamta! Yes, it's in the public domain, you can use it free. It's a derivation from my old film camera, so I don't have any higher resolutions. Good luck with your book about ganja farmers. Anything about cannabis as medicine and the actual research about medical use? --85.226.106.239 10:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Caspiax,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Maria Valtorta B.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maria Valtorta B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled[edit]

{{Helpme}} to get forms ov government in Swedish and how it should be published on the wikipedia site. I don't inderstan! --Caspiax (talk) 09:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Any questions about Wikipedia should be should be asked there. Alan Liefting (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bob Marley's autograph on LP Rastaman Vibration 1978.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bob Marley's autograph on LP Rastaman Vibration 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Masem (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bahaullah BlackWhite.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahaullah BlackWhite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.13.123.70 19:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláhs anlete by Nahib.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.13.123.70 19:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláhs ca 1868.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláhs ca 1868.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.13.123.70 19:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahá'u'lláh 1863 photo2rework.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.13.123.70 19:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)