User talk:William Ellison

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, William Ellison!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear William Ellison,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello William Ellison.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

--Krd 19:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modillons (corbels)[edit]

Bonjour. Merci de ne pas ajouter de catégorie liée aux seuls modillons à l'ensemble d'une église, comme dans Category:Église Saint-Pierre de Messeix. La Category:Romanesque corbels in Puy-de-Dôme concerne seulement deux photos de cette église. Père Igor (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Campagne L'été des villes[edit]

Bonjour, je vous invite de participer à la campagne L'été des villes en France. Des photo's télechargées entre le 21 juillet au 21 septembre peut-on marquer avec la ligne

{{L'été des villes}} [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]]    

ainsi elles compteront pour la campagne et seront montrées ICI . On peut également utilizer la uploadwizard de la campagne. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Absidiole Sud de l'eglise Saint-Sauveur de Saint-Macaire[edit]

If the problem with this category is that the files in it are misnamed then individual deletion requests should be made, however if this is the only problem and you intend to upload the files again with correct names. then asking for them to be renamed is probably the best option.--∼∼∼∼

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Asques (Gironde) Limite communale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JuTa, The problem was spelling mistake in the licence template. It has now been corrected and the correct licence is visible.William Ellison (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coubeyrac Limite communale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magog the Ogre (talk), my silly copy/paste error has now been corrected. Yours sincerly William Ellison
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Les Billaux Limite communale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BadJPEG for OpenStreetMap images[edit]

I have answered on my talk page, please read. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 02:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Réponse à ta remarque sur File:Charles Bénard cropped.jpg[edit]

Bonjour William, Terpereau peut avoir pris la photo avant sa mort et l'agence de presse l'avoir édité en 1908. La notice Gallica et la photo originale semble bien indiquer que le cliché est de Terpereau. Je ne vois pas dans le modèle comment faire le distinguo sur les deux dates et un {{other date|before|1897}} correspondrait plus à Terpereau. Ancalagon (talk) 05:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Église Saint-Martin de Mazerat[edit]

T'es sûr que ce n'est pas la même église ?

Pyb (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Pyb, La photo 2166 est effectivement l'église St Martin de Mazerat.
La photo2167 n'est pas le portail
La photo 2167 n'est pas l'intérieur de St M de M (fenêtres gothiques dans l'abside est)
La photo 2168 n'est pas une église ! Il s'agit des murs d'enceinte de St Emilion (près de l'ancienne porte St Martin)
Merci pour la pique ! Ca m'a incité de chercher en détail.
Peux-tu t'occuper des renommages et categorys ? William Ellison (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
oh merci, super boulot. Je renomme tout ça prochainement. Pyb (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drawings of Hermann van der Hem[edit]

Bonjour, Si vous importez des images de Gallica, merci de le faire complètement et correctement. Exemple : File:Bordeaux, Tombeau de Mgr François de Foix, comte de Candale, btv1b7741956g.jpg. Ici la source et la description étaient incomplète, le code langue de la description était faux, le nom inapproprié, la licence inexacte, et la résolution trop petite. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guignard Gaston - Troupeau à l'abreuvoire (1894).gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

F (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gouts, limite communale[edit]

Bonjour, Je voudrais vous signaler que, sur votre dessin, la "pastille GOUTS" symbolisant le coeur du village vous a été dictée par la localisation de l'église. Cette localisation complètement excentrée n'est pas du tout le coeur du village. Gouts est un village dont les maisons sont dispersées sur plusieurs kilomètres dans la campagne sans réelle agglomération villageoise. En tout cas ce n'est pas dans le secteur de l'église que se situe vraiment le coeur du village, mais là où se trouve la mairie actuelle. Je vous invite à voir les coordonnées GPS du véritable centre de village dans l'article de Wikipedia concernant Gouts. Cordialement--Tyerabla (talk) 18:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langon - Place de l'église 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Philh-591 (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ce document extraordinaire ! Cdlt, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jacques Chaban-Delmas et Antoine Priore le 21 novembre 1972.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jacques Chaban-Delmas et Antoine Priore le 21 novembre 1972.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dr Fournie - Dr Berlureau - Commissaire Durand - Antoine Priore c 1964.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dr Fournie - Dr Berlureau - Commissaire Durand - Antoine Priore c 1964.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick Rogel Thanks for the message. Getting written confirmation for the usage of these photos will take much more than 7 days. I will ask for their immediate suppression now and reload them in a couple of months, Yours sincerely William Ellison (talk) 04:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, AntonierCH (d) 06:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:CFP-2 Millerand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cheep (talk) 20:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Collection Félix Potin[edit]

Félicitations pour avoir scanné les collections Félix Potin. Mais Pourquoi les avoir scanné à une résolution aussi faible ? Beaucoup ne font que 200 ou 300 pixels de large, et il est parfois impossible de lire le nom du photographe sur l'image, ce qui est pourtant fondamental pour attribuer l'auteur et déterminer si la photo est dans le domaine public en Europe. Il aurait fallu les scanner à 300 ppp, voire 400. --Trouverunpseudoesttropdifficlesurcesite (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Description de l'Egypte - cabinet (famille Delavau).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Description de l'Egypte - cabinet (famille Delavau).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Émile-Alexandre_Taskin photo Felix Potin[edit]

Hello,

I found the original photo of Taskin that figured on the postcard used by Felix Potin shops. It was a photo taken by Nadar that I uploaded in a better quality to replace the former one.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CFP_Taskin.jpg

I haven't changed the name without exchanging with you.What about changing the name of the photo in TaskinNadar.jpg?

Best regards,

Noyeux (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Noyeux, Thank you for the information concerning the origin of the photograph of Taskin which was used in "La Collection Félix Potin". Unfortunately you replaced the image of a card from the Félix Potin Collection (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Collection_Félix_Potin for a couple of thousand other cards in the collection) by the Nadar photograph which was used to make the card. The two images are distinct and should be kept distinct. I will revert https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CFP_Taskin.jpg back to the oringinal image and téléverse the Nadar photo, with the name
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nadar_-_Émile-Alexandre_Taskin_(1893).jpg
into the https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nadar - Émile-Alexandre Taskin (1893) where it has its place.
En ce qui concerne downloads from Gallica : If you simply use the method proposed by Gallica you get the relatively low resolution image (174 ko). However, there exists a plug-in for Firefox and Chrome which allows you to download with the MAXIMUM resolution.
For the Taskin photo the image I downloaded is 2.1 Mo.
You can find the plug-in here : http://www.geobib.fr/tool/iiif/ (you can upload images in JPG or TIFF formats). You might find it useful for other photos by Nadar in Gallica. Best regards William Ellison (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello William Ellison. Sorry for having changed the image from the Félix Potin collection : I didn't think it could be important for you. Félix Potin was a French businessman who creates shops in France so it will probably never be the photograph of this collection. The last shops closed in 1996. Thanks for the plug-in that I din't know for the quality of the photos. I just download it and I will use it for my next downloads. All the best. Noyeux (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te[edit]

Wikimedia Italia
Wikimedia Italia

Gentile William Ellison,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché una tua foto è usata in una voce di Wikipedia o altro progetto Wikimedia.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Postcard of Lormont[edit]

Hello William, thanks for your uploads of postcards in the Category:Lormont on post-cards. Maybe you are interested in the Commons:WikiProject Postcards. It is ok, if I change the name of the category to Category:Postcards of Lormont. This is more the standard name for this category. See Category:Postcards of Paris or Category:Postcards of Berlin. Best regards -- sk (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sk, No problem about changing the category name. It comes at auseful time as I will be adding a hundred or so new postcards of Lormont. Thanks also for the link to the postcards projet. Best regards William Ellison (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello William, now I see the categories in Category:Postcards of Gironde. Wow! But can we change the names to "Postcards of ...". This is more the international standard. So we can prevent double categories like Category:Postcards of Lacanau and Category:Lacanau on post-cards. I will help by change this names. -- sk (talk) 05:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello sk , Ok. I will start, but is there some way of automatically changing the category of a file when the name of the category changes ? There are hundreds of files to change : William Ellison (talk) 05:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. But you can use the tool Cat-a-lot. -- sk (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I start at Z an go to A. -- sk (talk) 08:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks William! The first part is done. It was many work. Now there are only some Subcategories. With this Petscan-Search we find the last categories with "post-cards". We should also rename all of this categories. --sk (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stefan, It was a pleasure to learn more about the inner workings of Wikipedia ! I will start renaming the sub-categories from the letter A this morming and, if necessary, tomorrow morning.William Ellison (talk) 02:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work and all uploaded postcards. Can you help to translate the first section of Commons:WikiProject Postcards in French? Like I do it for German. The project is realy new. And I wait for more participants. It would nice if we have a french welcome page under Commons:WikiProject_Postcards/fr. If you have some question, you can ask me. Best regards -- sk (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stefan, Ok for the translation, I will do it tomorrow. I had a quick look at the Cateory:Postcards. There's a lot of cleaning up to do ! I will help a bit, but my major interest in Wikipedia is to contribute to writing articles. As far as postcards are concerned, they are very useful to illustrate articles on sujects dated around 1900. For example the page w:fr:Crime de Langon is illustrated entirely with postcards. Whenever I am looking for postcards to illustrate a page I usually look at the web-site Delcampe, they are about 60 million postcards visible. If I found what I want, I then download the image, put it into shape with a simple image treatment programme and the load it to Commons. The resolution is not high (usually about 400 ko, but is sufficient for an image in an article. Best regars William Ellison (talk) 16:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stefan, I have translated the first paragraph into french. I think it would be a good idea if the introductory paragraph, in the three languages, are all on the project page. It avoids jumping back and forth between pages, which could be a discouragement for many. I have added my name to the list of participants, but I want to make it clear that I am not very interested in carrying out organisational tasks, except to correct my own stupidities ! However I will follow all the recommendations when I add new postcards to the collection. To give the project some publicité I will post a message on the list of wikinautes around Bordeaux and on the list of members of Wikimédia-France. It might bring in some participants. Best wishes William Ellison (talk) 07:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello William, thanks for your translation. As participant you have no responsibilities. It shows only that you are interested in this project. It is all free. Some week I do for the project many things and in another week I have no time. This project try to join people whit interests in postcards. - When I look at your uploaded postcards I found often the signature M.D. or LL. or AH. Last week I learned that M.D. are the signature of Marcel Delboy. LL stands for Léon & Lévy. If you see postcards with this signatures, please set also the category for this publisher. I don't know yet the name of AH (. You collect all signatures here: Logos_of_postcard_publishers#Signaturs. - If you have postcards of animals like File:Lugos - carte publicitaire.jpg set Category:Postcards of pigs or in this postcard File:Bordeaux - Maison Purrey.jpg you can set Category:Postcards of transport. Thanks for all your fine work. -- sk (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Stefan, I am interested in using Pattypan to upload lots of postcards. I have tried som experimental test, which work fine, but I have a couple of questions :

  • How do I indicate that the file is to be in several categories (For example : Category:Postcards of Lormont and Categoru:Postcards published by Marcel Delboy ?
  • Can I use wikicode such as {{Creator:Marcel Delboy}} for the author ?

Once I get to understand how to use Pattypan I couls write « How to use the programme for idiots » text. Best wishes William Ellison (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello William,
  • two or more categories must separated by an semicolon and you need no word "Category:". For Example: "Postcards of Lormont;Postcards published by Marcel Delboy".
  • Yes this work. I do this with Pattypan for all postcards in Category:Postcards by Erwin Spindler.
If you send me an email, then I can send you my table-file of Erwin Spindler. -- sk (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Léon & Lévy[edit]

For nearly all LL postcards, the pictures are taken by unknown local photografers, unless signed. As a general rule I only consider that the publisher and author are the same, for postcards of small local publishers who publish their own work. Travelling extensively to take local pictures at that time was expensive and time consuming, and left little time for the the publishing and running a business. So I reversed your modification for File:Arcachon postcard.jpgSmiley.toerist (talk) 09:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I use the the broader PD-France license instead of the frequently used EU-Anonymous template for old French postcards.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Smiley.toerist, thanks for the information. I did have some doubts. William Ellison (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why the reversal without explanation?Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Smiley.toerist, very sorry, I must have spent to much time correcting others errors and I got very tired ! William Ellison (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We are human and make mistakes. Wikimedia work tends to all absorbing and sometimes a break is needed. The world will keep turning whatever we do. I did a Google search on 'Camaïeu' postcards. (from File:Bordeaux tram 1905.jpg). It gets confusing as it is also a printing techniek and a clothing shop. search: 'Camaïeu cartes postales' FR Wikipedia However there are also postcards of Angers and Lyon, so I suspect the postcard editor is not local. I dont see many Camaïeu postcards so I suspect it is a small publisher. Not a big name such a Levy or Nels, but needing a nummering system for ordering. So I am hesitating if it is unknown author or not.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Postcards_NEEDING_CATEGORIES has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Leyo 10:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files with no license[edit]

Hi!

These files have no license:

  1. File:Arcachon_-_boulevard_de_la_Plage_5.jpg
  2. File:Arcachon_-_la_Jetée_12.jpg
  3. File:Arcachon_-_la_Jetée_13.jpg
  4. File:Arcachon_-_la_Jetée_4.jpg
  5. File:Arcachon_-_la_Jetée_de_la_chapelle_9.jpg
  6. File:Arcachon_-_monument_aux_morts_(14-18)_1.jpg
  7. File:Arcachon_-_villa_l'Ensoleillée.jpg
  8. File:Arcachon_-_Ville_d'Autonne_1b.jpg
  9. File:Asques_-_vue_générale_1.jpg
  10. File:Beaulac-Bernos_-_avenue_de_la_Poste.jpg
  11. File:Blaye_-_Port_7.jpg
  12. File:Blaye_-_usine_à_pétrole_1.jpg
  13. File:Bourg_-_Porte_du_port_(2).jpg
  14. File:Braud-et-Saint-Louis_-_bourg_1.jpg
  15. File:Camp_de_Saint-Médard_-_barraquements_1.jpg
  16. File:Camp_de_Saint-Médard_-_jour_de_fête.jpg
  17. File:Castillon_-_avenue_de_la_Gare_1.jpg
  18. File:Castillon_-_monument_de_la_bataille_(1453)_3b.jpg
  19. File:Cérons_-_château_de_l'Epinay_1.jpg
  20. File:Coutras_-_pont_sur_l'Isle_4.jpg
  21. File:Croix_d'Hins_-_Delagrange_1.jpg
  22. File:Cussac-Fort-Médoc_-_église_1.jpg
  23. File:Escaudes_-_pont_sur_le_ruisseau.jpg
  24. File:Fargues_(Gironde)_-_château_Peyron_3.jpg
  25. File:Gensac_-_allées_de_la_République.jpg
  26. File:Gradignan_-_château_Laburthe.jpg
  27. File:La_Brède_-_château_de_Montesquieu_1.jpg
  28. File:La_Réole_-_Pont_suspendu_13.jpg
  29. File:Langon_-_allées_Maubec_7.jpg
  30. File:Langon_-_château_des_Sables_2.jpg
  31. File:Le_Bouscat_-_bourg_2.jpg
  32. File:Léognan_-_château_de_Léognan_2.jpg
  33. File:Lesparre_-_pont_de_Lervaux_4.jpg
  34. File:Lèves_-_bourg_5.jpg
  35. File:Lignan_-_bourg_1.jpg
  36. File:Lormont-la-gare-vue-sur-les-voies.jpg
  37. File:Martignas_-_Lagrave_1.jpg
  38. File:Martignas_-_vallée_de_la_Jalle.jpg
  39. File:Mérignac_-_château_Foucastel_2.jpg
  40. File:Mios_-_La_Leyre_3.jpg
  41. File:Montagne_-_château_des_Tours_14.jpg
  42. File:Périssac_-_bourg_3.jpg
  43. File:Périssac_-_Gare_1.jpg
  44. File:Peujard_-_château_de_Lascazes_5.jpg
  45. File:Prignac-et-Marcamps_-_château_de_Grissac.jpg
  46. File:Saint-André-de-Cubzac_-_rue_Nationale_4.jpg
  47. File:Saint-André-du-Bois_-_bourg_5.jpg
  48. File:Souges-camp-le-commandement-au-pavillon-mangin.jpg

Could you have a look and fix it? --MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MGA73, thanks for the information. I have corrected all my typing errors. I obviously was tired ! William Ellison (talk) 04:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Yes that sometimes happen. I was tired too. If I had noticed that only a "}" was missing I would have added it :-) --MGA73 (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vignonet - Mairie et écoles.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vignonet - Mairie et écoles.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello William Ellison, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) Ychoux - Gare 1.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Language templates with no text displayed. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hi, I made translation, and this draft is for this English article, and this draft is for this French article, but I can't do myself because I don't have established account. Can you do it for me by replacing the text source of each article with the appropriate draft, by doing selecting, copying and pasting. Thank you again!✋😀--103.38.215.158 07:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you can make any changes in Wikipedia, even if you are not a registered user. Howver it is much better if you create an account (very easy to do) and make your contribution to both the english and french wikipedia. Best wishes William Ellison (talk) 08:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Double upload[edit]

Hello William,

here did you one postcard twice uploading to commons. -- sk (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stefan, Oops ! I will delete one of them. William Ellison (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong artist File:Dax (Landes) - Fontaine chaude 30.jpg IMHO: LL not Marcel Delboy. --sk (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops again ; error corrected William Ellison (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Langoiran - ruines de l'ancien château 2.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Langoiran - ruines de l'ancien château 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EugeneZelenko All the files are subject to the licence {{PD-old-70-1923}}. I have made the corrections in each file. No doubt the original error was caused by an unfortunate Copy/Paste operation ! Yours sincerely William Ellison (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please fix remaining File:Bordeaux - Quai de Paludate.jpg. I removed {{No license since}} from rest of files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, EugeneZelenko, it's done William Ellison (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done my part. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Avit-Saint-Nazaire - bourg 3.jpg[edit]

Hello,

I think your file File:Saint-Avit-Saint-Nazaire - bourg 3.jpg is misnamed. You probably meant "Captieux - Place principale 3" because it's the same postcard as File:Captieux - Place principale 2.jpg with the addition of a big red postage stamp. I don't know what's happened to Saint-Avit.

Philh-591 (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ː Hello Philh-591, you are quite correct ǃ I don't know what happened , probably a copy/cpaste error with pattypan. I will ask for the file to be deleted, Thanks William Ellison

I thought rename ("Captieux - Place principale 3") rather than delete. Even though it's the same postcard as Place principale 2, some people find postcards with stamps on them interesting. But whichever you wish. Philh-591 (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maîtres de l'affiche V 1 - Pl 19 - Ferdinand Bac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pessac - Villa Bonton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Symac (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salut William, j'ai vu ta carte après avoir uploadé ma copie, reprise depuis le site des archives dans une meilleure résolution, il vaut mieux supprimer cette première version je pense (je suis en train de travailler sur un brouillon sur le propriétaire de la villa et je creuse donc pas mal sur le sujet ! À bientôt, Symac (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Symac , Merci, tu as raison ; il faut supprimer ce fichier. Cordialement William Ellison (talk) 07:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:FR-ABM243300316 BORDEAUX 0015 C 0025 001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: French painter Domergue died 1962, thereby PD-old will apply as of 1 Jan 2033.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 10:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a painting you uploaded[edit]

This painting . My question is "do you know if it is in the forest of Meudon as mentioned in the article Louis Tauzin. Thanks for your help if you know. --90.90.233.169 21:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bordeaux - Place de la Bourse 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jjjiijjj (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Illustration - Noël 1913 p 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly The Angel (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]