User talk:AlMare/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Heinz Klein-Arendt-07 retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Z.Zt. wohl noch copyvio da keine OTRS-permission. Jocian kümmert sich drum.--Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Danke, ich weiß. --AM (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Regards
Happy new year to you too --Carlomorino (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Disturbing foreground
Hi AlMare, sowas muss doch nicht unbedingt sein ... -- Gruß, aka 10:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mag ja sein, aber der Typ kotzt mich an. Nichts für ungut, Gruß --AM (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Noch mehr heißes Wasser draufkippen kühlt den Streß aber auch nicht ab. Tässken Tee und Plätzchen? :-) -- smial (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Werden sehen, ich geh' jetzt erst mal ins Thermalbad. :-) Tee und Plätzchen dann hinterher, danke gerne. Ich steuer dann noch etwas Rum bei. (minus 5 hier und 20 cm Neuschnee in der Nacht -->Schneeschippen) Schönen Gruß und nachträglich gute Wünsche für das Neue Jahr! --AM (talk) 09:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Noch mehr heißes Wasser draufkippen kühlt den Streß aber auch nicht ab. Tässken Tee und Plätzchen? :-) -- smial (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- No idea about both. I' m working on retouching and enhancing photos. --AM (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hallo!
Bist du Christos Vittoratos? Wenn nicht, so musst du von dieser Person die Erlaubnis einholen die besagte Datei unter der angegebenen Lizenz zu veröffentlichen. Hierbei ist ein sog. OTRS-Ticket notwendig: alles wichtige hier: Commons:OTRS. --High Contrast (talk) 00:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Was kann AlMare dafür, daß der GFDL-Baustein diese alberne "Ich, der Nutzungsinhaber...."-Formulierung enthält? Im Beschreibungstext steht eindeutig drin, daß das eine bearbeitete Version von File:Max-bill junghans.jpg ist, und da ist Christos Vittoratos der Uploader. @AlMare: Ich baller bei sowas übrigens immer den Fotowerkstatt-Baustein rein, auch wenn die Überarbeitung gar nicht im Rahmen der Fotowerkstatt, sondern auf eigene Initiative hin erfolgt ist. Hat sich noch nie jemand drüber beschwert, und der leuchtet dann auch schön auffällig. -- smial (talk) 09:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Ps.: Ich hätte in dem Fall (nur aufgerichtet/gedreht) einfach das Original überschrieben...... Pps.: Ich sehe, gerade erst, ist ja sogar aus der Fotowerkstatt........
- Danke smial ;-) Ich habe dem nichts mehr hinzuzufügen. --AM (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ppps: Wo ich das schiefe Bild gefunden habe, hab ich's gegen die gerade Version ausgetauscht. -- smial (talk) 16:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Danke smial ;-) Ich habe dem nichts mehr hinzuzufügen. --AM (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- License added. --AM (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 22:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I've only retouched this pic, original uploader was Neozoon. You'd better ask him. Regards, --AM (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Mycenae_plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
38.111.13.130 13:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Auditorio de Tenerife Pano
Hallo, wegen [1] und [2] bitte ich dich noch einmal eindringlich, auf sowas zu verzichten. Commons:Image annotations nennt solche Kommentare ausdrücklich als unsachgemäße Anwendung dieser Anmerkungsfunktion. -- aka 14:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Katakomben Fresko
Hallo AlMare. Habe dein schönes Fresko Bild auf Italienisch und Deutsch beschrieben. Könnte ich dich bitten der Deutsche Text zu korrigieren (oder wie du willst auch zu ändern), und wenn möglich ihn ins Englische zu übersetzen? Ich währe dir sehr dankbahr! Saluti italiani --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für die Blumen :-) , aber die Bildqualität ist leider nicht so gut. Ich habe die deutsche Beschreibung etwas angepaßt. Ach ja, englisch fehlt ja auch noch, das mach ich jetzt noch schnell. Viele Grüße zurück nach Bella Italia! --AM (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Danke dir für die Korrekturen und die gute englische Uebersetzung! Saluti, --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Karte korrigieren
Hallo AlMare. Darf ich dich wieder mal stören, und bitten / beauftragen diese Karte zu korrigieren? (Tuscony --> Tuscany) Nur wenn du Zeit und Lust hast, of course... Alles Gute, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Erledigt, ciao, --AM (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Mille grazie! --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Please give images good descriptions
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!
--Santosga (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Koms-vestib_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fernrohr (talk) 23:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
4028mdk09 (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Pancevgoldenkopacka_retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've just retouched the original pic - no idea about the license, --AM (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Bruxelles_Juste_Lipse_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.170.180 12:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Alexander Binder retouched.jpg wurde zur Schnelllöschung vorgeschlagen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Alexander_Binder_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FASTILY (TALK) 09:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Grabmal_1_psycho.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Avron (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Biennale di Venezia 2001 Hard Smoked Sausage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Biennale di Venezia 2001 Hard Smoked Sausage.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Jesko Friedrich 3 retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
mabdul 07:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Maximilian Emanuel von Washington retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 17:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
File:L-Westreich 1908 retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 17:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Oberlin Smith 1888a retouched.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Oberlin Smith 1888a retouched.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Saibo (Δ) 17:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ich habe es in die deWP unter gleichem Namen verschoben (wo auch die anderen Bearbeitungen und das Original sind). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
I've made an edit, thats it. --AM (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook
I would like to include your picture of the dolia at Villa Rustica in Boscoreale http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Boscoreale_Villa_Rustica_Dolia.jpg in an architecture textbook translation I am working on. This would show at about 1/15 of a page in an illustrations appendix I am adding.
I wanted to check that would be OK with you, and ask about additional information (real name, perhaps location) that I could add to the credits, which would show in the legend immediately below the picture. [Just in case, I can be contacted at thechabon ATT!! hotmail DOTT!! com.]
Iiiiaaaa (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, you can use the picture. Quotation with my commons-nick is enough. The location is inside the "Villa Regina", a partly reconstructed roman villa rustica besides the Museum (See here). There was a wine press in this house and the dolia probably contained the wine. Maybe you send me a copy when it is printed? If yes, I will email you my adress. Ciao, --AM (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Questions about the Tomb of the Leopards image
Hello,
I am working on a two-part paper for an online magazine and have a few questions about the Tomb of the Leopards image you have posted here. Part 1 identifies the various kinds of contextual information people have noted as being useful for digital preservation (technical details, intellectual meaning of the object, copyright, etc.) and Part 2 shows how the framework I developed can be applied in practice using several examples. There are a few questions requiring your input since you are the creator of the image. Hopefully the questions aren't too onerous. :-)
Questions:
Did you create the image with a camera while within the tomb, or was this image created by scanning a previously published image?
Can you tell me what equipment was used in creating the digital image?
If the image was scanned, do you know the title (and other pertinent details) of the publication?
If you took the image in the tomb, do you happen to remember if there were any copyright restrictions placed on images taken of the tomb? (I remember hearing several years ago that the Italian gov wanted to copyright the Italian landscape and so I am curious about whether or not this ever came to pass.)
Are there any restrictions on how the digital image you created can be accessed, used or exchanged?
After you created the image did you upload the file to a computer, an external drive or other device before uploading it to Wikimedia? (This question gets to the issue of authenticity and integrity of the file.)
Many thanks for answering my questions.
JEB
PS. If you want to learn more about the kind of work I do: http://slis.wayne.edu/faculty/bio.php?id=61932
Hi JEB,
I took this photo within the tomb on 16th of june 2001.
Camera was a (that time brandnew) Canon Digital IXUS 300 (US: Powershot S300).
There were no restictions and I took several photos (like I did at numerous other italian archeologic sites).
I uploaded (as I regularly do) the photo to a harddrive in my computer.
I hope this helps you.
Regards, AM (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Biennale Di Venezia Pavillon Of Sweden And Norway 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
124.149.151.113 14:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Fixed now! --AM (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Fixed now! --AM (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Licence
Hi, I work for the german "Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie" which organizes a congress in Munich in the next year (7.-11.10.2013). We would like to use your photo of the tomb of the diver (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paestum_Tuffatore.jpg#filelinks) on our brochures and other materials. Under which conditions is that possible? Thank you! - D90
- Hi D90, just a quote of my commons user name and specimen copy. Please send me an email: hsapiens@cooltoad.com Regards, --AM (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Biennale di Venezia 2009 Chen Zhen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bob247 (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
License:Canosa_Ponte_Romano.jpg
Dear AlMare, I would like to use your photography of this Roman bridge on the cover of a book, memories of a friend o mine that are dealing a lot with journeys: "Weite Wege - Zwischen muslimischen Engeln und teuflischen Diplomaten" (Far Ways - Between Muslim angels and satanic diplomates). This book is going to be printed soon (400 copies). To be sure that I am allowed this, I would ask for your permission. I would also like to learn if you prefer to be referred as "AlMare" or with another name or organisation. Then, I need an adress of you for sending a couple of copies of the book. Thank you very much for your attention. Tevfik Turan, Verlag auf dem Ruffel (ruffel.de) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canosa_Ponte_Romano.jpg
- Hallo Tevfik Turan, Sie können das Bild gerne verwenden. Bitte kontaktieren Sie mich unter: hsapiens@cooltoad.com Ciao, --AM (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Biennale di Venezia 2009 Caféteria by Tobias Rehberger.jpg
- File:Biennale di Venezia 2009 Danish&Nordic Pavilion.jpg
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft+flipped.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft+flipped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 18:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 18:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Amaro Lucano Bottle.jpg
- File:Anisetta Meletti.jpg
- File:Arrack Mendis Bottle.jpg
- File:Blue Curaçao Bottle.jpg
- File:Cognac Hennessy Very Special.jpg
- File:Fernet-Branca Bottle 1Liter.jpg
- File:Grand Marnier Bottle.jpg
- File:Grappa Storica Nera Bottle.jpg
- File:Ouzo Sans Rival Bottle.jpg
- File:Pastis Ricard Bottle.jpg
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2003-1128-500, Münchener Abkommen, Unterschrift Benito Mussolini retouched.jpg Ralf Roleček 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Napoli-museogabinettosegreto01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jebulon (talk) 16:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Venezia Giardini pianta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
czar 15:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
czar 18:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Robert von Erdberg modified.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Robert von Erdberg modified.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Robert von Erdberg modified.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Plan Of Ancient Herculaneum.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
KDS4444 (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You seem to have a habit of uploading images to Commons that you should not. This one, though you may have taken the photograph, has an underlying work owned by the Italian Ministry which created it. If you can show that they have freely licensed it, then it can stay. Otherwise, this is another copyright violation. KDS4444 (talk) 06:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, (t) Josve05a (c) 18:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear AlMare,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Castel Del Monte Throne Room.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Sailko (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
File:BW Barettabzeichen KSK retouched.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnar (💬) 14:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Loutraki Water Bottle 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Diamante Murales fasan-98.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Diamante Murales fasan-2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
File:BW Barettabzeichen KSK retouched.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnar (💬) 11:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Altarino maradona modified.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Durruti-militia retouched small.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
czar 16:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion for File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg
Picture of Diane de Poitiers
I was writing a post on Chenonceau and noticed your picture of Diane des Poitiers is not correct. In fact, I think it is Gabrielle d'Estrées as the huntress Diana by Ambroise Dubois. The actual painting by Francesco Primaticcio, Le Primatice, from 1556 is shown in my post on the interior of Chenonceau (sorry, can't figure out how to include the picture). I think you should replace the picture. Thanks
Kurt Buzard MD FACS www.traveltoeat.com kurtab@cox.net
Copyright violations
Hello AlMare.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)