User talk:Editor at Large

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to my talk page!
Archive


If you have a request you can leave it here. Please use this format:
===Request for (type of request) on [[:Image:Example.jpg]]===


I will respond to your message on your talk page, unless you request otherwise.

Long conversations with multiple people may be cross-posted to talk pages of the involved persons.

Hello, Editor at Large. You have new messages at Dereckson's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Making Friends[edit]

Hello! Thank you for contacting me and giving me guidance. I am thrilled to have interacted with an administrator, especially one that has appreciated my contributions to Wikimedia and I can have as a Wiki-friend. Having looked at talk pages of articles, especially things that have to do with maps, I have noticed a lot of hostility between users and I am happy my first acquaintance has been friendly.

My goal in Wikimedia is to help where help is needed. I have noticed excess files that are duplicated, inaccurate and/or meaningless on the commons and thought it would be a good idea to clean it up. I am doing this to help, not to cause ‘vandalism’. I think, if people were to think about it, for example, how many images of the global version of the Spanish Empire do we really need? That particular collection of files had over 100 redundant, inaccurate or otherwise ridiculous files.

How do you become an administrator? I have been slightly interested in these ‘special accounts’ and wondered how they are claimed. As I said before, my intention is to help and not make matters worse and administrators have ‘higher power’. I probably never will “need” an administrator account and just have you as an administrator-ally. 99.226.115.81 00:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heloo again! I see you havn't responded to my first comment yet but that's fine, no rush. I went to what i thought was the talk page you had left feedback and put something there. it wasn't the right one. it was my talk page on Wikipedia which i would likew to keep untouched. Could you please delete the page. just type in or copy this into your WIKIPEDIA search bar to get to the page I would like deleted: User Talk:99.226.11581. Thanks. 99.226.115.81 02:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get Well Soon![edit]

As the title says. ;)

BTW There are disscusions about wiki - podcasting again, perhaps you could quell peoples ambition a bit? ShakespeareFan00 17:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I don't believe in healthy things to get better, so have some homemade cookies :) Patrícia msg 12:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see your name in the log - hope you are making progress. Take care --Herby talk thyme 08:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Solid wood what!? :X --Buickid 10:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D--Buickid 08:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

international language support via special:Gadgets[edit]

Dear Editor at Large! Please copy

  1. w:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-BiDiEditing to MediaWiki:Gadget-BiDiEditing
  2. w:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-BiDiEditing.js to MediaWiki:Gadget-BiDiEditing.js
  3. w:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-ShortLink MediaWiki:Gadget-ShortLink
  4. w:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-ShortLink.js to MediaWiki:Gadget-ShortLink.js
  5. m:wikt:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-EoMagicalConversion to MediaWiki:Gadget-EoMagicalConversion
  6. m:wikt:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-EoMagicalConversion.js to MediaWiki:Gadget-EoMagicalConversion.js
  7. w:yi:MediaWiki:Gadget-section-LanguageSupport to MediaWiki:Gadget-section-LanguageSupport

Please add the folowing lines to MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition

==LanguageSupport==
* BiDiEditing|BiDiEditing.js
* ShortLink|ShortLink.js
* EoMagicalConversion|EoMagicalConversion.js

between the « Categories » and « Admins » sections. Thanks for all your efforts in advance! Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor at Large thank you very much for the implementation! Greatings from Munich
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 01:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Protests (March 15)[edit]

Hi,
I noticed you attended the previous “anonymous” protests for Wikinews. Will you be able to cover the March 15 protests? Please be aware that preparation for the March 10 protest is being coordinated at this page. If you think you could report on the article for Wikinews add your name to the list.
82.33.114.90 18:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please get well soon[edit]

Dear Ayelie, I've returned from my break and there is more about it in your e-mail. Please get well soon! Love, Kyoko 21:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 21:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to inform you that I have redrawn this picture. I hope you'll get well soon also. Otourly 20:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you cropped images from Koeh series, like Image:Koeh-022.jpg. I think that is great, but you should have included those captions in the image description. --Jarekt 15:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might I ask you for help?[edit]

Hi. I recently tried to convert a bitmap (.png) graphic (a chemical structural formula) into a vectorised graphic (.svg), using InkScape... It didn't work out as it should; I've read the guidelines for vectorisation of bitmap images, but my skills are apparently too poor to accomplish this yet. Could you please help me..? The .png image I wanted to convert into .svg is this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Methyldopa.png ... I'll be thankful, if you could vectorise it and/or explain me how to do it myself. Thank you in advance;) Cheers, --Spiperon (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you;)--Spiperon (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much;) Now I'm almost done with the graphic thanks to your tutorial... Just one question: I've made an image that consists now of ~30 objects and paths; how do I "bind" them together and vectorize finally? Thank you again... --Spiperon (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I made 2 more tries, it works in my browser, however, it doesn't appear as an image in the file here on Commons... So I hope I made it right, if not, I'll look up tommorow. Thank you very much;). --Spiperon (talk) 02:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC) (P.S.: Hope you get well soon).[reply]
Yay, I did it! :D MethyldopaFinal.svg did work out as it should. Could you please delete following images:
Methyldopa2.svg
Methyldopa3.svg
MethyldopaVect.svg
MethyldopaExplicitChirality.svg
MethyldopaVectorized.svg ? I uploaded these trying to get the one .svg working and as it finally got like I supposed, these are superfluous... Thank you so much once again;) --Spiperon (talk) 17:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this Correct[edit]

I just uploaded Image:Carnival miracle.jpg, and I'm not sure if I did the licensing correctly. Sorry if it is not free. By the way, are there any images on PhotoBucket that are free? Goodvac (talk) 19:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found article without an image[edit]

I'm without the status to replace the "non-picture" therefore I'm hoping to just state the article that lacks its photo: the article can be found by looking up George Hearn and there isn't a picture there and I have found one from google: http://www.timeout.com/chicago/export_images/125/125.x190.theat.georgehearn.jpg. That's about it really =) but i'll post more if i find any...

Image Compression[edit]

I notice that you are an admin on the wikimedia commons and that you clean up images. Come see the current disccussion regarding compressed images at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Smaller_Wikipedia_Logo_files (I have compressed and created a smaller wikipedia header file for www.wikipedia.org)Smallman12q (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for answering so soon. I'd rather to erase this image 'cause I need to change the name of the file and some other information in it, as well as some things of the image itself. Thank you so much again. --Maulucioni (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Comitium[edit]

I am going to check. I am uplaoding a different file to replace another image similar for now and will check my svg file! Thanks. --Amadscientist (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ayelie. If the IP is right, it might be better to delete the image. I got it from her (she is a tourist guide in the national park) and thought, she was the photographer. In articles, the image could be replaced with this one. --Leyo 06:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC) PS. Please reply here, thanks.[reply]

If you still have her email address, you can get her to send you a statement along the lines of "I verify that I am the photographer and copyright holder of this image, and I give permission for it to be uploaded to the Commons as {{licenseofchoice}}. Then you just have to forward the email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and you're all set :) See COM:OTRS. If you can't get in touch with her or don't think she'll reply I can do as you suggested and replace use of that image with yours and delete her version. Let me know if you need it replaced & deleted and I'll take care of it! -- Editor at Largetalk 06:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I do not have the original e-mail with the image anymore. Do you think, the replacement image should be cropped first? The problem is that the leaves are sharp, but not the animals. --Leyo 06:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should, yes - are you proficient at editing photos or would you like me to try? I know some tricks for sharpening things up a bit that might help. -- Editor at Largetalk 06:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious how well your tricks will work. :-) --Leyo 06:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go :) Not perfect, but a slight improvement over the original. I'll replace the other photographer's image with this one and then delete it. -- Editor at Largetalk 06:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All done, globally replaced and deleted. And please feel free to replace my upload if you can do a better job, my tricks are by no means the best ones :P -- Editor at Largetalk 07:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Leyo 07:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's good[edit]

To see you around more again :) Hope all is ok & take care --Herby talk thyme 07:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Goodricke[edit]

I notice you removed the request for deletion from the John Goodricke page. Please don't. This image is not in the public domain and has been the subject of a complaint by the Royal Astronomical Society to Wikipedia. The original uploader scanned a copyright image from Sky & Telescope without an acknowledgement to the source. The original art, the reproduction from which it was scanned, and the image rights are all unambiguously owned by the Royal Astronomical Society, on whose behalf I am attempting to have the image removed. RoyalAstronomicalSociety (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Favour[edit]

I left him a message. Unfortunately, I doubt he will even bother. If he was willing to talk he would probably already have done so already. I've done this a few times already and it never worked. But hey, we never know :) Cheers, and keep up the good work! Waldir talk 11:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about frame removal[edit]

Hi Ayelie, thanks for your recent work on frame removal - I had a question though with regard to File:Henry VIII (reigned 1509-1547) by English School.jpg. In this case it appears that the frame is a faux-frame that was part of the original painting - so we probably want to have both versions around (the cropped version is better for showing the subject, but the uncropped version is better for showing the complete painting). Is it okay with you if I upload the new version under a new name? Thanks. Dcoetzee (talk) 21:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I'll double check with Berger about the frame. Dcoetzee (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Woops, I checked with Berger and it turns out "[t]he frame on our portrait of Henry VIII is an actual three-dimensional frame". My apologies for the error - I'll go ahead and delete the old revision. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: User:Nwtxqt[edit]

Nope, go right ahead. I was going to do another round of image sleuthing, but batch deletion seems to be the more efficient way to go about it. Thanks! --Ytoyoda (talk) 06:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for your help on flickr reviewing the pictures. Cheers from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: If you can help, please try to mark these 3 images. The WEF image is especially critical as it has President Mahinda Rajapaksa in it just 3 days before the LTTE chief Prabhakaran was killed by the Sri Lankan army. It was uploaded by Admin Lupo...but an Admin cannot mark his own images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sotomayor[edit]

It was my intent to replace the current image with an official USG portrait, or a better one of her. I uploaded the second image to the crop version. Hope that's okay. Evrik (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Over zealous vandalism protection :-)[edit]

I think your deletion of page User:Rastaman3000 was an over zealous vandalism protection. It appears to me that User:Orbah1 just greeted Rastaman3000 with "WAZAPMAN?!--Orbah1 (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)", probably translatable into English as "What's up man?!" and signature. A perfectly reasonable edit :-). --Tony Wills (talk) 22:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I didn't notice it was his user-page rather than talk-page, but still not quite vandalism! The deletion log comment wasn't quite appropriate, and it was something the users could have sorted out quite happily by themselves :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Did I get it right this time?[edit]

Thanks for your feedback. I've uploaded some more pictures. Please review File:Parrot (PSF).png and let me know if I did this correctly this time. Please respond at my talk page. And please delete File:Iguana 2 (PSF).png

The above IP address is used in a school, and I was using it when I got an warning from you for vandalizing, which obviously meant that someone else had vandalized, as I had not. Should there be a notice on the talk page telling people that this IP address is in a school? I know they have it on Wikipedia, but I wasn't sure about Wikimedia so I just thought I'd tell you... 66.17.183.2 15:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The toy soilder pic[edit]

Could I use the toy soilder pic that you made in a barnstar. I'm Abce2 on Wikipedia, so could you please answer there? Abce2 (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with an SVG image[edit]

Hello. I'm very sorry to bother you, but I am having a problem with a SVG image I uploaded: File:Soyuz Diagram.svg. I'm not only new here (the commons), but this is the first SVG I have ever made, so bare with me! The text on the image, despite being fine in my graphics program, runs together in the render. I cannot work out the problem.
I made the image in CorelDRAW X3, and the font in meant to be in Times New Roman (the font on the orginal gif). When exporting the image it gave me the option of rendering the text as curves, but I left it as text. I admit I don't really know what that meant, so it could be the problem.
Any help you give would be much appricated. Once again, sorry to bother you. Thanks, --EightyOne (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@ "Test" sent to my own IP for a photo comment-- No worries, I'm not a vandal... I suppose I just really liked the picture, but it's not "Testing", and it's not a vandal issue.

Hi. Your assistance is needed in this case here. A few days ago I uploaded this picture to wikimedia commons. I then got the written email permission from the owner of the picture and forwarded the email to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org. After that I contacted someone with an OTRS account, Trixt. Trixt confirmed the permission and fully released the picture under the required license. A few days later Trixt tagged the picture with the "Personality rights warning" tag. I asked Trixt why this is being done. You can read the reply of Trixt here and here on our talk pages. Finally, Trixt wrote me, saying that his english is bad, that I should get in touch with an English admin, that he doesn't know what to do.

I have checked through many wikipedia pages and have taken a close look at the pictures used from wikimedia commons. There are loads of pictures that do not have the "Personality rights warning" tag. Trixt claims that all pictures of living people should have that tag. This claim makes the whole issue suspicious. If all pictures of living people must be tagged with the "Personality rights warning", and the only way to properly upload pictures into wikimedia-commons is to get the approval of someone with an OTRS account, then what happened to all those pictures AFTER they were confirmed by someone with an OTRS account? How come those people with OTRS accounts didn't immediately tag these pictures with the "Personality rights warning" tag, the way Trixt did to the picture I uploaded? This looks like a double standard, and I thusly ask you to look into this and please remove the "Personality rights warning" tag from the picture in question.

The picture in question shows a nigerian actress, Genevieve Nnaji, in 2008 at a public event, the launch of Genevieve's new fashion label. Genevieve Nnaji is one of the top nigerian Nollywood actresses. She is also a model. Her pictures are all over Nigeria and Africa on billboards (she is the Face of Lux 2004), and she has played in over 100 Nollywood movies. Thus Genevieve Nnaji is a "person of contemporary history". She is a public figure. The picture I uploaded was taken by Niyi Tabiti, a nigerian journalist. Mr Tabiti has fully agreed to the full usage of the picture under wikimedia commons license. There are no personality right infringed with the usage of this picture. If wikimedia-commons claims, like Trixt does, that all pictures of living persons SHOULD be tagged, then this rule must apply to all pictures on wikimedia-commons. The fact that wikimedia-commons has loads of pictures of living persons without the "Personality rights warning" proves that different standards are being applied to different pictures. I thereby ask you to please remove the "Personality rights warning" from this picture. Thank you.
Amsaim (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This request was duplicated across many pages. See User_talk:Amsaim for the consolidated discussion. I also took it to Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#A_situation_to_keep_an_eye_on. ++Lar: t/c 20:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shaduf[edit]

I created Category:Shaduf and added some pictures. I created a redirect called Shadoof. When I use the search box Shaduf doesn't work but Shaduf does. Did I do something wrong? Thanks. oksmith (talk) 01:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In common colloquial English usage, "Don't miss..." can cover both of those subtle shades of meaning. I changed "Do not overlook" because it was very uncolloquial for the context of a political slogan... AnonMoos (talk) 18:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I included the picture into de:Zangenamperemeter. There are funny effects with the rotation: omitting the parameter upright or setting upright=1 leads to a distorted picture (the picture rotates 90° inside the upright frame). Setting upright=0.9 or 1.1 is OK. I have never seen this bevor. Is it somehow a consequence of your picture rotation? --Harke (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

considered here that problem behind kaput and reserved --Fredy.00 (talk) 15:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday[edit]

Happy Birthday to you! Vatsan34 (talk) 04:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated template for deletion[edit]

Template:Cleanup (PSF) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--billinghurst sDrewth 09:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine[edit]

Hello, Sorry for spaming your talk page, but this is very important. On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. Also they believe that common's policy is not so clear regarding the issue. And since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A.Talk 14:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that this should be PD? It is a DW of a copyrighted image File:Commons-logo.svg. --MGA73 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor at Large. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Request for removing frames/cropping at File:Elizabeth and Leicester miniature pair Hilliard.jpg[edit]

I wasn't aware of the frame problem when I uploaded this, so I put a tag on it afterwards. I would be very grateful if you could have a look at it, to see if removal is feasible. Thank you! Buchraeumer (talk) 16:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your response! It would be great if you could try removing the frames, as you said. If you have time, that is; there is no hurry of course. Thanks again. Buchraeumer (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your pains! The file is great as it is! It does a good job on the "Elizabeth I of England" page on en.wikipedia, a somewhat dated FA. Buchraeumer (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about deletion[edit]

Hi, I have been working on Wikimedia Commons for quite some time now, mainly specializing in cleaning it up by organizing and nominating unnecessary files for deletion. Most of my work has been widely accepted by the community and I have two very steady supporters here on the commons which is always very welcome.

I am contacting you because I have some questions to ask and can’t find the answers to them and since you are an administrator I thought you might be able to answer them:

  • When a file I have nominated is deleted is it really deleted or does it just become ‘hidden’?
  • Do people perform ‘undeletion’ often?
  • Whether they do or don’t, how long does it take for undeletion to be unavailable for an item deleted a certain amount of time ago?

I hope I was clear in my questions. (Please respond of my talk page) Maps & Lucy (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! (Any comments please leave here) Maps & Lucy (talk) 00:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Editor at Large. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong with my upload[edit]

Hi, I need help with an upload I did mere minutes ago. can you fix it for me?

I fixed the boarder of the Baltic Sea on Weimar Germany on this map and it is not showing as you can see. Please fix this for me and restore its resolution to 841x732, (I think the image shrunk too). Maps & Lucy (talk) 01:37, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Italiano: (missing text)

Mi scuso per il disturbo. Potrei avere un tuo parere in questa discussione [1] ?

I apologize for the inconvenience. May I have your opinion in this debate [2] ?

--Ligabo (talk) 09:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PICT4581levels.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin inactivity[edit]

Hi Editor at Large. I am sad to tell you that your adminship has been removed in acordeance with our inactivity policy. If you'd like to be a sysop again, I'd kindly ask you to request so at COM:RfA. Sorry to tell you this bad news, abf «Cabale!» 15:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ayelie, I know you're not on Commons much these days, but if you do need any administrative action performed please feel free to drop a note on my talk page, or if I'm not around on Commons:Administrator noticeboard. I'm always glad to help out. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorize image[edit]

Can you use Inkscape to vectorize File:Angelina Jolie by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg? Mopper (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:North_Korea_coa.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ただいま。[edit]

O hai there. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 05:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Statue_of_Asai_Chū_(浅井忠),_Sakura,_Chiba,_Japan_-_20070211.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 17:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CentaurusA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:LVTA4-amp31.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:LVTA4-amp31.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Steve Wozniak oval.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danish_municipalities_1970-2006.svg[edit]

I have been on the lookout for shapefiles of Denmark with the danish municipialities before 2007 (where a major revision occured). I can see you have uploaded an .svg file displaying the boundraies here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Danish_municipalities_1970-2006.svg Do you have the original data available? (If in shapefile that would be great, but any format will do). I would be very appreciative of any help.

A message from A Certain White Cat[edit]

Hello Aylie!

I have been back on commons for about a year now and I quickly noticed you were missing. I honestly missed your company on the wiki and to be honest this was one of the reasons why I decided to cut my 2 year wiki break to an end.

Do you remember m:All the world's a wiki? Oh, the fun times! I miss such pure silliness that had brightened up my mood on days which were most stressful to me.

Or how about these: . These simple shapes had been very useful to me even though you probably didn't use a fraction of your awesome talent on them.

I realize you may have your reasons to cease contributing to commons and I do not want to intrude on your decision but should you ever consider returning, please do. :)

I do not know if you are ever looking at this talk page but should you notice this please at least let me know if you are doing fine. I realize I am being selfish in asking this but it would at least put my mind at ease to know that you are OK.

-- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 01:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DSC 5208-MR-NotreDameDeLaGarde.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Bapti 13:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ballet Nacional de Cuba pas de deux.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BluesyPete (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArezzoIMG 0377.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 22:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5 years later[edit]

eh?Philipp Michel Reichold (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April - National Contribution Month[edit]

Good day Editor at Large,

During the month of April, Wikimedia Canada is preparing the National Contribution Month, and we are looking for experienced contributors to organize a contribution day (or half-day) in their region.

Contribution days are activities where Wikipedia's contributors, students, or anybody interested in contributing to Wikipedia meets together to collectively improve a predetermined theme. This meetings generally take place in library where references are easy of access, but can be organized in any communal room. Beside improving articles, a goal of this participatory workshops is to initiate neophyte in the cooperative contribution of Wikipedia.

If you are interested in organizing or participating in a contribution day in your region, communicate witht he national team on the project's talk page. The exact agenda of each local event is left to the discretion of the organizer. Help is available for the organization from contributors who already organized these type of days, so don't be worried. If you have any questions or want more information, don't hesitate to contact us.

Amqui (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:M. Dealporte.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:M. Dealporte.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:M. Dealporte.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dervis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 09:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I´m asking for a permission to use this image in my book about Pasta. Thank you and best regards.

File:Hanuta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:1st Marquess of Dorchester.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 16:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 13:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melaleuca images[edit]

Hello Ayelie,

I have been working on the genus Melaleuca in Wikipedia for a few months now and today have spent some time on the main page. Unfortunately, I went a bit like a bull at a gate and deleted some images that others had added to that page. I felt that some of them were rather "random", including an image of melaleucas after dark! One was yours (Melaleuca leucadendra - Köhler–s Medizinal-Pflanzen-092.jpg). I hope you will not mind if I have moved it to the Melaleuca leucadendra page. I think it looks much better there. Please let me know if that's a problem for you and I will move it back.

Having treated you so badly, now I'm asking for help! For the life of me, I can't figure out how to organise subcategories in Wikimedia Commons. I've tried Hot Cat and Cat-a-lot without success. The subcategories are there but not organised alphabeticlly. This is the problem page: [[3]]. I know it's not a huge deal but I like things to look good. Any help would be much appreciated.

Gderrin (talk) 03:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moses Mendelssohn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 10:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Alabama (BB-8) 1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 00:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 04:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 05:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 07:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 01:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 01:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 04:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 08:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 16:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 16:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 04:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 07:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 11:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 11:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 21:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 10:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 21:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 21:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 16:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 18:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Reventtalk 09:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Reventtalk 15:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Reventtalk 15:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Ellet (DD-398).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Reventtalk 02:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use Of Image Of Qin Stone Slab[edit]

Hello,

I am writing from DK, a London based publishing house. We are a part of the Penguin Random House group. My Email is aditya.katyal@dk.com.

One of the books that we are currently creating for children is the First reference History.

We would possibly like your image on wikipedia:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CMOC_Treasures_of_Ancient_China_exhibit_-_stone_slab_with_twelve_small_seal_characters.jpg

Hope you are fine with it.

By agreeing to let us use this image we understand we have your consent to use this image in all editions in all forms of the work (including digital products based on First reference History) in all languages throughout the world.

DK is an award-winning global publisher of distinctive, highly visual products for adults and children. Founded in London in 1974, we are enormously proud to be the worlds leading illustrated reference publisher. You can view our books at: http://www.dk.com

We look forward to hearing from you and would be happy to answer any queries you might have regarding this request or publication.

Best Aditya Katyal Picture Researcher, Tel: 91-120-4689600

DK 3rd Floor, Mindmill Corporate Tower, Plot 24A, Sector 16A, Film City, Noida, India, 201301 www.dk.com DKinVideo

New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada[edit]

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [4]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nero Azzurro Croce Sangiorgio.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Busan tower by night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Image editing programs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:15 anniversary of Image Comics.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The photographer is not the copyright holder of the posters that form the majority of the photo, and consequently cannot license this photo without cropping them out.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 22:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]