This image was selected for display on the Main Page as the picture of the day. Click here for more information.

User talk:Shizhao/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Tomchen1989 (talk) 04:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SonyCEO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 12:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you restore this image. We have a borderline OTRS permission but I need to be able to see the image to get a good permission (it's one of several listed on the same webpage). Ticket:2011011010015933.--Chaser (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:P history.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Màñü飆¹5 talk 09:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for opposing[edit]

Please, add reasons when opposing, so we can learn from it. You did not give any reason here, here, here, here, here, here, here, or here. This is a multilingual project, so you can give a reason in Chinese if you like, but please give some reason. Thank you. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I can translate this to Chinese:

请,增加原因,当反对时,因此我们可以从它学会。 这是一个多语种项目,因此您能给一个原因用中文,如果您喜欢,但是请给一些原因。 谢谢。--The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

为什么在上传自己的作品文件是总会出现Internet Explorer[edit]

为什么在上传自己的作品文件是总会出现Internet Explorer 无法显示该网页 的情况,只有少半数能上传成功,有的反复上传数遍还是如此...有解决方案吗?----颐园新居 (talk) 08:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powers (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

该图片的使用情况在维基百科模板中没有相关版权模板。但据中华人民共和国著作权法的规定,得依例在标注原著作组织署名的情况下,进行自由发布。具体条款已在描述中说明。请阁下看下应如何处理。--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 06:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

    • Template:回应,既然属于政府这样一个非营利性机构,应该使用什么版权模板,是那个美国的政府版权模板吗?--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 08:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
      • 但维基百科有一条“合理使用”的规则用于有版权的图片。该图片援引的是《著作权法》的第22条第2款,只是作为一个“为介绍、评论某一作品或者说明某一问题,在作品中适当引用他人已经发表的作品”。况且图片的引用是为了介绍一个事件,图片是符合该段所述事项的,并无不适当引用的问题。所以,现在应该使用何种模板?--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 09:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
        • 那就烦请您将该图片快速删除,我在维基中文里面重新上传下,谢谢--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 07:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
          • 如果上傳到中文維基中,並沒有違反不合理使用也沒有違反相關國家法規,而且該圖片是爲了說明該段關於環保治理中蘇州河的有關工程,且圖片上亦附有正確而且適當的表述,怎麼不能放在中文維基百科中使用?哪裡違反了合理使用這一概念?維基的合理使用條款中并沒有提及“对于条目非常必要”且沒有與之相關的可推理至的該概念的邏輯語句,所以放在共享資源是有問題,但放在中文維基中尚未見到有問題的原因。 此致--Shanghai, the biggest city in CHN 09:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

What is the problem with this image? This picture made by NASA was got from USGS Global Visualization Viewer which distributes NASA imagery. The relevant tag with NASA source was added to the file description. A lot of imagery from this soutcr was stored in WikiMedia Commons as NASA is a legal source. This image is not present online like in WorldView (you see a portion and simply store it), but you need make a spatial selection (in this case - Shanghai) mouse clicking on the destination point, next in the new window select a type of image 'collection' (for this image 'Global Land Survey' where select 'GLS 2005', next yellow rectange will show the image available: if you were missing the tagget just shift the rectangle using arrows in the menu. When you will be targeting properly you will find a n information in the 'Scene Information' field: ID: LE71180382005227EDC00 Date: 2005/8/15. Just press 'Add' button and 'Download'. When you will store the file you need to compose from specrtal bands the RGB image.Bogomolov.PL (talk) 06:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category redirect change proposal[edit]

Please see Commons talk:Only use category redirects where necessary#A solution. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the uploader of this file, I noticed that it was actually uploaded by mistake. Furthermore, something in this file may express some of my private details to the public. As a result, I've uploaded another revision (in order to remove the private information) to replace this version. Would the mistakenly-uploaded file be deleted? --howard61313 (talk) 05:25, February 11 2011 (UTC)


Miklós Horthy[edit]

You deleted the "Horthy_swoon.jpg". Date: 1917 by unknown sailor. The picture is anough old and well known in all Books about Hungarian History. Why did you do that? Please don't be vandal.

經查該文件是中興巴士的日野ERK2JML大客車,而非指南客運所有。車身有「中興巴士」四字為證。阿貴上傳時就已命名錯誤,文件描述也錯誤。我已上傳修正後的版本(File:CSBus 109AB Route 311.jpg),請協助刪除原件。感謝協助。--Solomon203 (talk) 05:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please undelete File:AraWilson.jpg as we have received the OTRS permissions from the owner Ara Wilson. The OTRS TT # is 2011031110000327 --Sreejith K (talk) 06:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Sreejith K (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Benceno.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 23:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benzol2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove a global block?[edit]

Hi, Shizhao. My work computer seems to be connected to Internet via ip 203.116.198.69 You have put a global hard block on the IP as an open proxy. Is it possible to remove the hard block on commons as it makes impossible for me to edit during lunchbreaks, etc. Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2011無綫節目巡禮.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Tryphon 12:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you bother to read the discussion regarding this image? It was nominated for deletion in 2008, but the decision was to keep. It appears the matter is closed, yet you tagged it for possible deletion for the very same reason that it was originally tagged — the site from which the image was originally obtained was redesigned. Just because the site no longer shows the image does not mean that the source information is invalid today. Instead of tagging it and notifying the uploader, who isn't necessarily the same person who originally posted the image to Wikipedia and may not be active on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons anymore, a better approach would be for your to do some research and try to verify the source of the original image.  —Quicksilver@ 20:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File Tagging File:Dependent Of TAIWAN.gif[edit]

Go to zhwiki and search for the deleted version on http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Dependent_Of_TAIWAN.gif&action=edit .--Waihorace (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CD-DVD-Verpackungen.jpg[edit]

Hi, you deleted this File:CD-DVD-Verpackungen.jpg; but there is no copyright violation; the source company granted permission to use this file under a free licence (see OTRS ticket. Could you please restore this file. Thank you. --Wvk (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harikalar Diyarı deletions[edit]

I saw you have deleted File:Harikalar Diyari DulDul 05990 nevit.jpg Please undelete this file and any other file deleted from this category. Please note FOP issues require a full DR, not copyvio, speedy or derivative. See the discussion at: Category_talk:Harikalar_Diyari --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Same Image[edit]

Hi,Shizhao! Pls help me to remove the image "Road-c.jpg" and "S7301671.jpg" because of the problem of vehicle plate number,meanwhile I uploaded a new version instead of them just now.Thanks!JHH755 (talk) 07:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem? Author and source are stated! --Steinbeisser (talk) 08:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holomicek foto Misterka.jpg was uploaded 10 minutes ago and declaration of the author to OTRS volunteers is sended right now. So where is the problem? --Gampe (talk) 09:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loading[edit]

Hello,
If you can leave me two minutes before flagging all my recently loaded pictures, that would give me the time to complete the sources. Regards Moumou82 (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted copyvio[edit]

Hi Shizhao! You acted a speedy I put up for one of User:Deanb's images. I have proposed almost all of his images for deletion because of repeated copyright violations (he has been blocked on English Wikipedia for this). Please take a look. Thanks, Ynhockey (talk) 09:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Réclamation[edit]

Tu viens de supprimer l'affiche dont je suis l'auteur pour violation de copyright !!! Peux-tu la rétablir ? Merci ! Cordialement. Basili (discuter) 12:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

I don't know who the copyright holder is but this logo is Trademarked.--The Tall Man (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please...[edit]

...delete this file! --The Tall Man (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

关于 "File:南无阿弥陀佛.jpg"[edit]

您好, 我姓陈,由于中文程度不好,所以长话短说。 关于有一张图片名为“File:南无阿弥陀佛.jpg”在wikimedia被您删除,由于我不懂得如何鞭策wiki而触犯规则问题,在此向 Shizhao 道歉。 “File:南无阿弥陀佛.jpg”的图片是没有存在任何版权问题, 而我想重新上传图片,不知 Shizhao 可否帮帮忙?帮我上传和鞭策。由于我缺乏知识与经验。谢谢您!等待回复。 功德无量!阿弥陀佛。

Borrado de Gifs tenerife[edit]

Has borrado esta foto File talk:Gifs tenerife.jpg, en su tiempo cambie las categorías alegando, Las imágenes ya están subidas al commons y son de mi autoría, espero haber completado lo que solicitaban y no borren el collage. No sé que realice mal, pero puedo dar fe que el trabajo es propio y que las fotos están todas en commons. Me gustaría lo volvieran a subir para poder añadirlo en su artículo correspondiente. Un saludo--Martely (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missing permission[edit]

Hi, before you speedy delete a file for "missing permission", please check if there is really no permission statement. Files can have a wrong template. For example File:AlYaquob1.jpg had a clearly stated permission and has been restored by me to await the ongoing regular DR. Jcb (talk) 07:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photorespiration3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 09:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Edwards[edit]

The Images where from En.Wikipedia with exactly the same licence. They have been deleted after the files were transferred on commons. Maldebaran (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rr lyrae aavso.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rs oph aavso.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rs oph aavso.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete File:Tigris-arcfestes.jpg[edit]

Source Own work

License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

This was clearly stated at the time of original upload

懇請協助刪除下列文件[edit]

目前我親自上傳至維基共享資源但待刪的文件如下,附上理由:

  1. File:Panasonic 50 inch PDP in THSRC Taipei Station.jpg:命名不夠周延,修正後的版本為File:Panasonic TH-50PH10 in THSRC Taipei Station.jpg
  2. File:CMC Delica 4WD 2500 Diesel right-back.jpg:命名錯誤,本型車車頭商標為三菱汽車商標而非中華汽車工業商標,修正後的版本為File:Mitsubishi Delica 4WD 2500 Diesel in Taiwan right-back.jpg
  3. File:Card case of Fuhobus 1980s back.jpg:命名不夠周延,修正後的版本為File:Card case of Fuhobus Banqiao-Keelung 1980s back.jpg
  4. File:National 6 inch bell.jpg:命名不夠周延,修正後的版本為File:National 6 inch bell EA16028230.jpg
  5. File:National 6 bell EA1602.jpg:命名錯誤,修正後的版本為File:National 6 inch bell EA1602.jpg
  6. File:Ubus Receipt Issuing.jpg:命名不夠周延,修正後的版本為File:Ubus Receipt Issuing 2010-05-02.jpg

懇請協助刪除上列文件。感謝協助。--Solomon203 09:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD June, 10th[edit]

Hi Shizhao, In the last years I have managed to insert as POTD for June 10th a picture related to Portugal, as this is our national day. And so I tried the same this year, with this old Portuguese chart. But it was already done by you! I'm puzzled: where you aware of the fact or was it just a coincidence? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:54, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was helping new user with this file. What is wrong with source? (I suppose he will ask me about that, and I have no idea ;) ) It's author's webpage, file was first published there ([1], [2]). thx, Piastu (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mobile phone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tony Wills (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

幫我刪圖[edit]

File:Dog devouring the remains of killed soldiers, Hankow (18+).jpg--俠刀行 (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for deleting those two duplicates. I created a redirect at the old location of one of them to keep the set complete, but now realise that a file move would have been better. Can you delete the redirect File:'The Carpathian Castle' by Léon Benett 33.jpg again so that we can move and redirect the other file instead. Sorry for any confusion :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 08:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Lulusuke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 03:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Dear Shizhao, I have a problem with the deletion of the files CMCLagerhuelse.jpg, CMC SENB.jpg, CMCDehnungsverlauf.jpg and Logo MT Aerospace.jpg. After the warning I got, I have posted on the discussion page of these files the following statements, which imho should have solved the problem:

This file has been produced by the company MT Aerospace AG in Augsburg, Germany. The Licence has been given by an authority of the company, as can be seen on the file page. The file is on the corresponding article of the German Wikipedia since 2006. Some user has removed the comment photo: MT Aerospace AG from the picture in the article with the argument that this information is given in the file itself, as it is in fact. So please do not delete or give me any information about what else has to be done.

So now I am asking you what´s wrong with the original license, which has been accepted for years in the German articels. Thanks in advance. --Leumar01 (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following advice, the licenses - up to now only presented in the files of the pictures - have been sent to permissions on May 23rd and been confirmed with ticket# 2011052310006377. So could you please restore CMCLagerhuelse.jpg and remove the warning on the others? Thanks in advance. --Leumar01 (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eh?! No it was not a duplicate, the image has obviously been cropped (to remove extraneous elements in the pic). It's specifically labeled a derivative and is currently being used in the English Wikipedia in a taxobox (the exact reason why it was cropped in the first place).

A duplicate is an image which is basically the same as the previous one. A cropped version is a derivative not a duplicate. I seriously hope you're not going around deleting every image which has cropped borders or are zoomed in versions of other files.

Please restore it.--ObsidinSoul 12:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oop. Sorry. >.< My bad, seems like FunkMonk uploaded a cropped version as well and overwrote the original. Should have checked.--ObsidinSoul 13:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah flag[edit]

That "flag" was so small it can't possibly be copy-righted. One could not even recognize the gun or the fist. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Logo_fcforum-nuevo.png"[edit]

Hello, Shizhao

I noticed you deleted this imaged I had uploaded. I took it from http://fcforum.net/es. The CC license is clearly visible in the home page and they even have a link to download the logo. I understand that if the image uses a free license you don't need permission. Could you restore it or at least clarify what's wrong with it? Regards --Pepa gotera (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

China ethnic groups[edit]

Hi Shizhao, the flickr uploader of this set is not the copyright holder, resepectively not the photographer as described in chinatoday. What do you think? --Martin H. (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Hello collegue!

Last year you have transferred this file from zh.wiki to Commons. This file has a broken image description and it has no categories. I tried to fix this file but I failed. Maybe you can help. A better file new would be appreciated as well, I think. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:SKM Estate Block A-D.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SKM Estate Block A-D.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 19:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hello,

You have deleted a file which I uploaded due to Copyright violation.

13:55, 26 May 2011 Shizhao (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Beating marks on the back of Nabeel Rajab after police attacked a peaceful protest on 15 July 2005.jpg" ‎ (Copyright violation: http://www.bahrainrights.org/en/node/371) (global usage; delinker log)

The work owner sent a permission message and got this reply:

Dear , All images listed on the following page have had the necessary modifications to the file page made: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&target=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bahrainrights.org%2F Thank you for providing this to us, and for your contribution to the Wikimedia Commons. Sincerely,

However, the file I'm talking about is still deleted and is not considered to be part of that URL.(Copyright violation: http://www.bahrainrights.org/en/node/371). Now it's clear that this file is within the website which gave to permission for all the pictures to be used. (and in the message it included that it's giving the right to all media within the website). I need help here. Mohamed CJ (talk) 06:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and FPC[edit]

Hi Shizhao!
Thanks for appointments of my photos as picture of the day. Please, made a nominations as Featured pictures candidate of my photos in the Chinese Wikipedia (if it probably by rules). Not all at once, 1-2 per a week. The list of possible candidates in the bottom of the message. All of them are used in the Chinese Wikipedia.
Yours faithfully, George


Здравствуйте, Shizhao!
Спасибо за назначения моих фотографий изображениями дня. Сделайте, пожалуйста, номинации моих фотографий в Китайской Википедии (если это возможно по правилам). Не все сразу, 1-2 в неделю. Список возможных кандидатов внизу сообщения. Все они используются в Китайской Википедии.

С уважением, -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SüleymanShahIIGoldDirham.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 12:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:2 3 Dichloro 5 6 dicyanobenzoquinone.jpg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:2 3 Dichloro 5 6 dicyanobenzoquinone.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 13:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


圖片被user:L4press騎刧,請刪除的user:L4press的上傳--58.176.42.242 00:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

template:technique[edit]

Hello Shizhao, I have seen that you had started a Chinese version of template:technique but did not complete it. We are currently working on a new version of this template, but Chinese does not seem very easy to do. Could you tell me if "drawing on paper" could be translate by "纸面图纸" ?--Zolo (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Shizhao!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You made this entry:

 ?! I just see, the whole template is wrong and gives a wrong date to all images: Template:Potd/2012-07 --Kürschner (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your template said, before I deleted it, it was the picture of the day at 17th July 2012! I promise, it was picture of the day? but when? --Kürschner (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I restored File:Aspire logo.gif, because obviously {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Please be aware of such aspects before you speedy delete a file. Jcb (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STOP[edit]

After my comment above you deleted File:Q-logo.png, which is also an obvious case of PD-textlogo. You *must* stop those deletions now or I will have to take actions against you. Jcb (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Funival-inhaalpunt.jpg[edit]

I saw- a little late as I wasn't online on Commons for a while- that above file has been deleted on 27 May 2011. The reason was Copyrigh violation. This is impossible as I created the drawing from scratch without using any existing data/files/graphs. So please undelete the file and make it available again. Many thanks, Tonkie (talk) 00:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I might mix up two files: although I still think that this file was made by me, it is possible that I do confuse it with Funi3a.PNG but can't confirm it as the file is deleted and although I had configured that I wanted an email when my Talk page was edited I didn't receive any notification (or it was deleted by an anti-spam feature: although I normally do receive mails from Wiki (pedia and commons).

So could you please tell me from which file the copyright violation was done: if I do make a mistake please let me know what was the original file where the 'funival-inhaalpunt.jpg' was copied from. Thanks again. Tonkie (talk) 00:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your behaviour gets too disruptive. You totally seem to ignore any message to your user talk page, something an administrator cannot afford. This is my last warning. If I see anything comparable in the near future I will act accordingly. Jcb (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles_Wesley_Price.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hahaqsngsb.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hahaqsngsb.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Hahaqsngsb.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images without sources[edit]

These reste know. And it is nice to remind them to me. But do not want to slow down? It has a discussion page will be for a while so large that it will not even open;-) For now, I do not display the embedded templates. So I do not know what the link and I have to look at history. Jedudědek (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lettere autografe[edit]

done. Thank you. --Aubrey (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you can not read, or what?[edit]

??

you can not read, or what?[edit]

?? Jedudědek (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

你可以看不懂,还是什么?[edit]

你可以看不懂,还是什么? Jedudědek (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

你可以看不懂,還是什麼?[edit]

你可以看不懂,還是什麼?Jedudědek (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source lacking?[edit]

I got a message about lacking source for the file: File:Lettere autografe Colombo.djvu. It's strange since the source is regularly (I hope) written into Information template of the file, with a running, unbrocken link:

Source=Internet archive

Is it a bot mistake, or is my syntax wrong? Thanks! --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 14:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologyze, now I see that Aubrey fixed the issue today. Thanks again. --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 14:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the message you left on User_talk:BAILLEUL consists of the text "Template:Autotranslate" and nothing else... AnonMoos (talk) 12:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it need a source if the tag saying that Ukrainian governmental emblems and insignia are free from copyright is correct? -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

✓ Done See [3] and [4]. And now? Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Santayana texts[edit]

Help me It seems like File:Egotism in German Philosophy (1916).djvu and File:Reason in Common Sense (1920).djvu have source information—what more is needed? Please respond on my talk. Thanks. Koavf (talk) 17:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Doña Urraca de Zamora.png and File:CONVENTO DE SAN NORBERTO.jpg[edit]

Hello! The first one came from here. It is the digital edition of a spanish newspaper. As it is from quite a long ago, nowadays you just can read the text [5] but the photo itself doesn´t appear yet (it did when I downloaded it to my harddisk years ago). Anyway, as stated there, it is a reproduction of an engraving from 1882 (therefore free of rights) appeared in the magazine "Zamora Ilustrada".

As for the second one, it is a reproduction of another engraving, of unknown author as the first, this one from the book "Historia de la Villa y Corte de Madrid", from 1861, and also free of rights.

I include the information on the respective description pages, and I'm sorry I didn't do it when I uploaded them (I was just a beginner here...) Best regards--Outisnn (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem with this image. Vinogradov died in the 30s (PD old), source is given. sугсго 12:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Watercress Darter.jpg[edit]

I added details on where the image came from, having emailed the Alabama Dept of Natural Resources and Conservation to verify that they got it from the Southeast Division of U.S. Fish and Wildlife. I'll try to track down who took the actual photo but I don't think Fish and Game generally provides attributions to their individual employees. Is this satisfactory? 30 June 2011 Schmiebel (talk)

Stop tagging free files[edit]

The sudden outburst on June 28 and 29 in Category:Media without a source is due to you tagging hundreds of obviously free files. This is silliness and disruption. Please revert. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at a very brief sample to see what was going on, and I have to say that I agree with Pieter that you have been reckless. One example I looked at was File:Blakelock, Ralph Albert - Bloomingdale Road.jpg. You tagged it as lacking author information. Do you really think that the author is not indicated? The name of the notable artist is in both the filename and the categorization. Further the category gives sufficient details about this painter to verify that the artwork is now PD. --99of9 (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you cannot be bothered to respond, eh? So I took it to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Admin Shizhao and his no-source tagging. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Shizhao, I think the fact you never respond to comments at this talk page is something an administrator cannot affort. Your last edit to this page was when you archived it 6 months ago. I think it you don't start responding now, you run the risk of loosing your administrator rights. Jcb (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:構造式_Benzene.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 12:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Struktura_benzenu.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 12:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion warning of deletion of Mollie Sneden house.jpg[edit]

Thank you for giving me time to acquire proper rights for this image. I wanted to let you know the process is taking a little longer than I anticipated. I received a reply to an email request for the rights today, but was advised to contact another party. I have now sent an email to that party and expect to hear back from them very shortly.Hisland7 (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the information today for the file, giving the source and permission. Can you please write me back about permission. I am uneasy about the entry. I confess it is a while since I added a photo, and I don't believe I did it right. Thank you.Hisland7 (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 山水册.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 山水册.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 山水册.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 寄人篱下图.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 寄人篱下图.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 牵马图.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 牵马图.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 牵马图.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 菊花图.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 菊花图.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 菊花图.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 水仙图.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 水仙图.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 水仙图.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:JUHUA.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JUHUA.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:JUHUA.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Homosex.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Homosex.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jinnong 红兰.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Jinnong 寄人篱下图.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jinnong 寄人篱下图.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong tags[edit]

Hello Shizhao, please don't tag files that are obviously {{Textlogo}} with "no permission", as you have done in this and another cases. Regards, -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:43, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have recovered the work File:A BASTOGNE STREET AFTER LUFTWAFFE BOMBARDMENT.jpg which was uploaded in 2006, and then marked just 10 days ago as, without source information. I find that a very quick deletion of a photograph, especially of a 1944 war photo that was clearly linked to a Wikisource work, that was itself a reproduction of a US military work. I would agree that it should have had more detail, I just don't think that the time frame for action was sufficient for a photo that has been on the site for five years. I will now categorise all those photos from that work to assist any further images to be identified.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bugsy Siegel Crypt.jpg[edit]

Can you indicate how you determined that this image was copied to Wikimedia commons, rather than copied from it? You marked it for speedy deletion as a copyvio of this page.[6] The editor who uploaded it say that he or she created it themselves.[7] WN.com copies a lot of material from Wikipedia. Will Beback (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sig_of_SElephant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Santosga (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you have apparently transferred this file from zh.wiki, please examine my CSD request at File:Scipione del Ferro.jpg. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your warning[edit]

I got this message into my discussion talk:

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Lettere autografe Colombo.djvu|base=Image source}} [[User:Shizhao|shizhao]] 
([[User talk:Shizhao|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand: source is clearly stated into Information template. Can you help me? --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 13:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see permission record #2011033110013419, as anounced at the File page. --Gampe (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请求帮助刪除下列文件[edit]

我自己的作品上传到维基共享资源因重复需删除文件:

  1. File:China Railway 25G 20090810 403.jpg:图片上传时因后期处理欠妥,细节损失较多,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways 25G 20090810.jpg
  2. File:China Railway 25G 200908 4131.JPG:图片上传时因后期处理欠妥,细节损失较多,命名不夠周全,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways 25G,Qin huang dao,20090810.jpg
  3. File:Rail transport in the China 25G 200908.JPG:图片上传时因后期欠妥,细节损失较多,命名不夠周全,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways RW25G 553020 20090810.jpg
  4. File:Rail transport in the China YW25G 200908.JPG:图片上传时因后期欠妥,细节损失较多,命名不夠周全,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways YW25G 674351 20090810.jpg
  5. File:Rail transport in the China CA25G 200908.JPG:图片上传时因后期欠妥,细节损失较多,命名不夠周全,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways CA25G 892849 20090810.jpg

恳请协助删除上列文件,感谢帮助。--颐园新居 (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    1. This deletion was completely inappropriate, being abuse of your admin tools. I will restore the files. Jcb (talk) 07:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • 我自己的作品上传到维基共享资源上传时因后期欠妥并重复需要删除有什么不恰当的?这家伙就没看到这些申请删除版本与重新命名上传的版本内容是完全一样的!真不明白为何对我的反复申请置之不理并实施了封禁,就因为我删除了需要删除自己作品的授权协议?--颐园新居 (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请帮助刪除下列文件[edit]

我自己的作品上传到维基共享资源因重复需删除文件:

  1. File:200908 DF4B 670.JPG:图片上传时因后期处理欠妥,细节损失较多,命名不夠周全,重新修正并重新命名的版本为File:China Railways DF4B 2537 Beijing North Railway Station 20090917.jpg

恳请协助删除上列文件,感谢帮助。--颐园新居 (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The file was kept after this DR, you MUST respect that. Your user talk page is not a valid place to request deletion. Jcb (talk) 07:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • 作者有没有权利申请要求删除自己的作品!你没有看到吗?!这是重复上传的、内容一样的作品!!理由我已经写得清清楚楚!--颐园新居 (talk) 10:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • 这家伙为什么不让删除以前的重复版本呢?既然我已经上传了新的版本,由于图片有不同的后期处理,为什么一定要使用{{duplicate|new-file-name}}而不能使用{{speedy|请求删除原因}}呢?----颐园新居 (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sz-iwbot - unfortunately this bot went crazy[edit]

The bot is putting modern people into the Category:Icons of saints. Please stop it.

Regards--Szilas (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

上传有误,请协助删除[edit]

File:HXD20049 200908 402.JPG 这个文件是描述和谐电(HXD)20049号机车,发现图片内容却是在秦皇岛车站内的HXD20045号机车,文件名字是错误的,文件描述的车号也是错误的,这是个疏忽的错误,请协助删除,稍后我会上传正确的文件,感谢帮助。--颐园新居 (talk) 11:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请协助删除文件[edit]

File:China Railways DF4B 2472 20110412.jpg 这个文件名描述是错误的,图片上传时疏忽出错,请协助删除,稍后我会上传正确的文件,感谢帮助。----颐园新居 (talk) 14:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请协助删除文件[edit]

File:DF4C 0018 20100406.JPG 、 File:DF4C 4458 20100406.JPG 、 File:8K 041 20100406.JPG 、 File:8K 143 20100406.JPG 、 File:8K 036 20090405.jpg 、 File:8K 104 20100405.jpg 这几个文件名描述是错误的,图片上传时疏忽出错,请协助删除,稍后我会上传正确的文件,感谢帮助。------颐园新居 (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: Picture of Yuanpao.jpg[edit]

Dear Shizhao We are graphic company from Thailand. We're very interested in your picture name: yuanbao.jpg, we wonder if you have a larger file of this. Kindly contact back at ae@graphic-station.net for further discussion.


Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

Missvain (talk) 14:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gift_of_USSR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClaudeMonet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oceanparkrides.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILYs (TALK) 07:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeanne_d'Arc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HenrikKbh (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Paradejack.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paradejack.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Paradejack.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chromium OS Screnshot.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chromium_OS_Logon_Screen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack[edit]

I'm sorry I made a personal attack on your in the deletion request I made. I was having a bad day (this isn't an excuse; it's just a reason). 18:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ArdashirII.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ArdashirII.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whats happening?[edit]

Please take a look to File:Lettere autografe Colombo.djvu; it had already both source and licence. Why do you send me a message into my talk page? Where am I wrong? I copied pd template into "permission" field too; was this my mistake? Thanks! --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 13:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imide1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Eb02.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eb02.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Eb02.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rastrojo (DES) 01:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]