User talk:Szilas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Szilas!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Contents

Image:Copper_object.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 18:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Please use the information template[edit]

Hi, please use the template {{information}} for the the maps that you recently uploaded. You have provided insufficient information to establish PD-old quickly and without doubt at the moment and you can be sure that some of the uploaded images will be nld-ed. Please document all your uploads as complete as possible as it adds tremendous value to your work. Thanks and I wish you a lot of fun here, Siebrand 10:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


Dear Siebrand,

the informations for the map sheets are mostly the same: 3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austria-Hungary - and the name of a characteristic place on the map sheet. The number of the sheet is in the title.

My source is also included into the article.

In my source I have also the name of the responsible officer(s) for the mapping of the individual sheets, but I don't think that they should be taken as the author. In principle, it is also possible that this person died later than 70 years ago. But in such an official mapping, I don't think that individual authors can be identified.

What is your view about this? What is the absolute minimum I have to do to safeguard the uploads?

I don't want to start the work all over again, of course.--Szilas 13:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Try to look at it from the point of view where you provide some textual information about the image: what is it, where does it come from, when was it created and by whom. This will allow more hits on a full text search and ultimately contribute to a more complete and useful media repository. Unfortunately you/we cannot be busy uploading images all the time. Take the beating now and do better next time :-) I see that you are already well on your way. Thanks and have fun. Cheers! Siebrand 18:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok.


For your information: You can also use {{badname|Image:name of other file}} if it is a badly named upload, otherwise you can use {{duplicate|image:name of other file}} for duplicates :) Deadstar 12:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Mondriaan[edit]

I had to delete the picture of the painting. Mondrian died in 1944, so it will PD only on 1 Jan 2015. If copyrightholders complain, in the end you will be responsible for such copyright violations. Please make sure that a picture is in the Public Domain _before_ you upload it to the Commons. --AndreasPraefcke 18:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

FPC[edit]

Hi. When nominating for FP, don't forget to add the image: tag before your image name. Thanks Lycaon 06:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

No trouble  ;-) Lycaon 07:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sculpture of official Bes.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture of official Bes.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Basilica of Tongeren[edit]

Hi! I improved your picture Image:Basilica of Tongeren, detail.JPG, I think it been much better, so I think no need to upload it as another version - if you agree I upload it as a new version of original file (may you have the original on your pc if you want undid it). I think this version may have better possibilities to be an QI. Best wishes --Beyond silence 02:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Kedves Beyond Silence!

Köszi szépen a segítséget, meg az előző képnél is a támogatást. Látom a magyar user lapodon, hogy azt pártolod, ha egy helyen vannak az eszemecserék, ezért ide írok.

Bár egész életemben sokat fényképeztem, de ez a szint még magas nekem. Van egy jó gépem - a 60. szülinapomra leptem meg magam vele (a life long learning erős híve vagyok :-)) - de még nem tudom kihasználni igazán a lehetőségeit. Különösen érdekelne, hogy miként lehet csökkenteni a zajszintet. Ha tudsz ajánlani erre vonatkozóan irodalmat a neten - angolul, magyarul, németül - nagyon örülnék neki.

Kösz még egyszer.--Szilas 07:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Csak mert egyszer akinek magyarul írtam visszaírt hogy angolul szokás, bár tényleg az az angol Wikipédia volt - na mindegy, jó lesz magyarul. Hát vérprofi én sem vagyok, de azthiszem a zajszint csökkentésére kontrétan az ISO alacsonyabbra vétele segít (ez az érzékenység). Jó lehet ha még növeled az expoziciót, ha nincs elég világos... Irodalmat netről még nem nagyon néztem a témába, keresőbe beírod talán találsz valamit. De a zaj szint csökkentésére a leghatásosabb módszer ha Photoshop nevű programot használód utómunkának - én is ezt használom, egész jól lehet vele zajt csökkenteni! Akkor felül írhatóm a képed? Minden jót --Beyond silence 12:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Persze, légyszi írd felül, csak jobb lehet.--Szilas 13:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Megtörtént.--Beyond silence 14:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Signac - La Calanque.jpg[edit]

I think that your newer upload on Image:Signac - La Calanque.jpg went a little too far; the contrast boost blew the whites a good portion of the picture. Keep in mind that when adding contrast, you stretch a thinner range of input over a larger range of output, so if you go too far, you will clip some of the detail off. I uploaded a slightly more conservative edit Image:Signac - La Calanque edit.jpg here. Thegreenj 22:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

  • OK, I added the edit at QI, with you as the photographer on the image page. Thegreenj 19:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Kösz[edit]

Köszi szépen a reviewot a képemhez! Minden jót --Beyond silence 15:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Signac - La Calanque edit.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Signac - La Calanque edit.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


Image:Signac_-_La_Calanque.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Signac_-_La_Calanque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Szilas 04:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Siipikarja,

thanks for your help with my Lissabon picture. If you like it now, you can easily promote it also :-).--Szilas 16:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


Hi Szilas,

for some reason your picture is not visible right now at Commons:Quality_images_candidates so I could one more take a look at it. Meanwhile, I translated your quality image descriptions to Finnish at User:Szilas. From your profile I learn that you can speak many languages very well:

  • hu
  • en-3
  • de-3
  • fr-3
  • ru-3

Could you do me a favor, and translate the description of the following photo taken by me to those languages? I promise I'll promote your picture as a QI, when it becomes visible again. :) --Siipikarja 00:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Kowloon Clock Tower June 18 2007.jpg

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rossio - Praca Dom Pedro IV.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rossio - Praca Dom Pedro IV.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rua Da Santa Justa, Baixa, Lisbon.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rua Da Santa Justa, Baixa, Lisbon.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Julia Domna - Cologne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Julia Domna - Cologne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Commodus - Cologne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commodus - Cologne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Duplicate images[edit]

Hi, for the images you mention for deletion on User talk:Marcelloo, can you please give the name of the duplicate file? In the future, you can also use the {{duplicate|name of other file}} template for these cases, it is faster :). Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 08:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austria-Hungary[edit]

The maps in Category:3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austria-Hungary are quite interesting, thanks for uploading. I've added some categories. Is there an overview index file available? Alphabetic ordering is of little help when looking for a specific area without knowing what the map is named after. --Matthead 11:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:3rd Military Mapping Survey of Austria-Hungary[edit]

These maps are fantastic- thanks for your effort in uploading them! I was wondering if you knew of any similar maps that cover areas to the east- particularly Anatolia. Any resources you know would be outstanding, thanks!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St Anne in Budapest I. district.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Anne in Budapest I. district.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Azamara Journey closing in to dock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Azamara Journey closing in to dock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View over the Botanical Garden in Brussels.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View over the Botanical Garden in Brussels.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued image promotion[edit]

Helsinki demonstration against the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.jpg
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A protest against the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 .

Dear Szilas, congratz with your first VI. I find it very interesting and sorry for being so suspicious. -- Slaunger 20:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Ingelborchtoren.jpg[edit]

Hi, I uploaded a noise reduced version of your nice image. However, Adobe colour space was in the process converted to RGB colour space. Please revert if you don't like it. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ingelborchtoren.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingelborchtoren.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brooklyn Bridge - detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge - detail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Island section from below.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Island section from below.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Freedom of Panorama[edit]

Hello: I saw your deleted comment on my talk page. It's a difficult subject for many people. Can I help, or do you understand it now?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reaction.

I think I understand, but it is extremely difficult to accept that I can't upload a picture about a building in a city.

What about people in the street? I met a week ago a Dutch royalty in the Netherlands in the street in civil, she smiled, I made a couple of photos, her bodyguard did not protest. May I upload it some time later?--Szilas (talk) 08:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it will help if you think about it this way -- you certainly know that you cannot make and sell copies of a recent book or a recent painting -- the whole point of copyright is to protect the creator from copying so that he or she can make money from his or her work. It gets a little harder to understand that you cannot make a photograph of a 3D sculpture -- after all, a flat photograph is not really a copy of a sculpture, but the same rule applies, except in FOP countries. Then, even harder to understand, is the fact that a photograph of a building is an infringement on the architect's copyright, but that is the law, except in FOP countries. The FOP rules are actually fairly complex, see COM:FOP
As a general rule, in most countries, people in the street are not a problem. Public figures -- including royalty -- are generally even less of a problem than ordinary people. In some countries, you have to be careful if the person is doing something that might expose him to shame -- something stupid, or illegal, for example. For more on this, see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
And, I should add, thank you for your effort and your work at understanding. Remember too, that photographs of older buildings are OK -- the rule in most countries is 70 years after the death of the architect.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank for your explanations; I'm getting more and more clever all the time :-))))--Szilas (talk) 06:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Landschaap bij Heemstede.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Atrium.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atrium.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.186.139 19:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Open_day_2007.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Open_day_2007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.186.139 19:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


I am writing to ask about the 16th century Antwerpen Passion of Christ altarpiece, of which you have put up a photo. Where is the altarpiece located?

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Köszönet a kiváló képekért. Tamba52 (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 35451007c711a9e4f16f8b574cb4402b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token b3d6f874f1639d79c29b82f5aa52874f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Congratulations, you are now a verified TUSC user! Weep tears of joy, or something.

File:Members of the Venice Commission.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Lucas Van Valckenborgh (circle of) - The Kitchen Maid.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rodin - Head of Pierre de Wissant.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rodin - Head of Pierre de Wissant.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Copyright status: File:Rua Da Santa Justa, Baixa, Lisbon.JPG[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rua Da Santa Justa, Baixa, Lisbon.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, for fixing this problem. --Jarekt (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Copyright status: File:Bright Days Festival, Mátészalka.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bright Days Festival, Mátészalka.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 16:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Basilica of Koekelberg.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Basilica of Koekelberg.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 05:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aanschouwing.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aanschouwing.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 21:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Schengen - text of memorial in Luxembourgish.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schengen - text of memorial in Luxembourgish.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 09:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Szilas. You have new messages at Eleassar's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

vandalism[edit]

What are you doing? Removing 8 or 9 categories per photos at a time? I restored all of your deleted categories on the photos I've seen you remove. You gave no explanation of the removal of the categories. --Mjrmtg (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Just because you think a category is meaningless Category:Libraries in the United States photographed in 2012, there is no reason for you to remove the category from the photos. You brought the category up for discussion but didn't discuss it with anyone. You cannot blank a category Category:Libraries photographed in 2012 just because you do not like it. Please stop this vandalism. --Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Please tell me why you removed each of these 8 categories with this edit https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AOdum_Library_3.jpg&diff=107109518&oldid=104913331 All of these categories are fine, they don't need to be checked. --Mjrmtg (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Removing the template from this category is Vandalism! Stop! Category:Libraries in the United States photographed in 2012 --Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Please tell me why you removed each of these 8 categories with this edit https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AOdum_Library_3.jpg&diff=107109518&oldid=104913331 All of these categories are fine, they don't need to be checked. You have no explanation for why you removed each of these 8 categories? Just stop removing categories. Vandal. --Mjrmtg (talk)


Copyright status: File:Rodin - Head of Pierre de Wissant.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rodin - Head of Pierre de Wissant.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

--Eleassar (t/p) 12:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear Eleassar,

I find it very strange that you always find me with your deletion ambitions. You do not read, only throw around stamps. This photo was obviously marked as my own (photo by Szilas in the Museum voor Schone Kunsten, Gent). Besides it is one of mine Quality Images. There are so many other important problems on the Commons which need your energy.

By the way, what is your opinion on the tsunami of such categories: "Category:Libraries in the United States photographed in 2012" and the kind? The date of a photo should not be a reason for a category in case of a building. and there are so many such meaningless categories with dates! I think they are very much wrong. Is there any discussion on this subject? I would appreciate your opinion on this.--Szilas (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I have not dealt with these categories, but in general I have no problem with them if there are plenty of files that need to be dispersed. If there are only two or three files in each such category, this is redundant. Otherwise, as the photo has been clearly marked as your own, you won't have a problem adding a copyright tag such as {{PD-self}} or {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}. That's all that is needed, but a copyright tag must be cited at all image description pages. Currently there is no such template, so the copyright status of the photograph remains unknown, which prevents its further reusage. I can't choose the license instead of you, even though I see that you have created the image, because I'm not the copyright holder. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for having added the missing template. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

My problem is that during the years I've uploaded many hundreds of such images: photos of artworks from many museums around the world, mostly paintings, but a lot of photos from sculptures, too. Is it really necessary to double all the copyright tags in case of the sculptures? (I hope that in case of two-dimensional objects it is really not necessary.)--Szilas (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

In general, we do not use doubled licenses for photographs of works that are in the public domain; it's enough to state that the author died 70 or so years ago (or that the work was created in 19th century or before), to prove that the original work is free. The derived photograph's license, however, must be stated in all cases for images to be freely available for reusage and thus eligible for Commons. I'd suggest that you go through your uploads (use Special:MyUploads) and provide the license for the photographs where it is missing. As they're valuable, this will be highly appreciated and will prevent them from being unnecessarily deleted. See the above image for how it has been done. Photographs of public domain 2D works don't need a license of the photographer, but you have to know that coins and bas reliefs are not considered 2D works. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your informative message.--Szilas (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

sculptures by Imre Varga[edit]

Hi Szilas, thanks for your photos of sculptures by Imre Varga. However, as these sculptures are still copyrighted, which also includes any depictions of them, you need to put the country of location into the description. In case sculpture are located in Hungary, you should also add {{FoP-Hungary}} below the license template. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright request[edit]

Dear Szilas,

First of all, I just wanted to say thank you for your work in making pictures available on Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to use one of your photos in a publication I am working on at the moment, and since it will be produced by a charity organization my royalties are not large (and would quickly be swallowed up if I had to pay for images).

My publisher, however, has requested that I confirm with you that you are willing to give me permission to use the following:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haystacks_%28Effects_of_Snow_and_Sun%29.JPG

Are you fine with this? If so, could you please email me at achalmers@adelaide.tabor.edu.au

Once again, thanks for your work and I look forward to hearing back from you.

All the best,

Dr Aaron Chalmers