User talk:Trzęsacz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trzęsacz!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 21:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

png <-> jpg are not duplicate[edit]

Just a note to say that different file types of the same image are not considered {{duplicate}} with regard to speedy deletion through deletion policy.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Cranach[edit]

Hello! Huge request to put this image in high resolution.--IgorSokol (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Lucas Cranach the Elder Portrait of King Ferdinand I, 1548 http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A&uid=892&page=4&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A_2013-07_Overall.tif

Can I get a response to the request?--IgorSokol (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Maybe it's possible to see this image?

Steinbrecher oder Die Steinbrecher ?[edit]

Du kennst Dich mit Robert Sterl aus? Weißt Du den genauen Titel des Werkes? Danke --Frze > talk 11:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Die Referenzseite, also die vom Museum, schreibt den Titel so. --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Danke: 1909 oder 1911? LG --Frze > talk 11:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Warum 1911? --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

--Frze > talk 12:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Diese Seite sagt 1911. Diese Kunstpostkartenseite hat zwar nur Miniaturbilder, aber sie ist eine der wenigen Seiten mit den vollständigen Grundinformationen zu den Bildern. --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Dr. Quermann klärt das sicher auf. Schreibst Du ihm? LG --Frze > talk 13:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Trzęsacz, ist diese Version nicht besser, wenn auch etwas kleiner? Und hier leicht beschnitten. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Ja, sieht besser aus. Man könnte versuchen, das „große“ Bild zu bearbeiten. Das Flickr-Bild ist auch gut. Vielleicht will der User Frze das drüberladen? --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Nö, ich nicht, wenn dann bitte extra neue Datei. Kein wirklicher Mehrwert, nur in der Farbe ein kleiner Unterschied, müsste man mit dem Original abgleichen. Das beschnittene gefällt mir überhaupt nicht, ich mag es ja auch nicht, wenn jemand meine Fotos "beschneidet" im schmerzlichen Wortsinn. LG --Frze > talk 05:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC) CC: @Oursana

File:Albrecht Altdorfer - Schlacht bei Issus (Alte Pinakothek, München).jpg[edit]

Hallo Trzęsacz,
soeben habe ich Dein Revert bemerkt. Es ist gute Praxis die Informationen zu einem Kunstwerk und dem dieses abbildenden Photo mit {{Category definition: Object}} und {{Object photo}} zu trennen und erleichtert gerade bei Kunstwerken wie der Alexanderschlacht die Wartung ungemein, alles in allem hat sie wohl gegenüber dem Speichern der Informationen je Datei große Vorteile. Der Beschreibung zur betroffenen Datei wurden so schon kleinere Korrekturen zuteil und ich kann auf diese Weise die kleine Angabe zur Entstehungsgeschichte, die zumindest fragwürdig ist, demnächst, wenn ich Zeit dazu finde, einfach abändern, ohne in 71 Dateien editieren zu müssen. Deshalb würde ich die vorherige Fassung gern wiederherstellen, wenn Du nichts dagegen hast!?
Beste Grüße und vielen Dank, --Marsupium (talk) 02:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Nein. Meine Bilder sind immer gut und ausreichend beschrieben. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
{{Object photo}} gibt es grade nicht deshalb, damit Deine Bilder „gut und ausreichend beschrieben“ sind, sondern damit die die Objekte gut, ausreichend und einheitlich beschrieben sind und sich bei Bedarf korrigieren lassen, dafür sind Partikularlösungen recht hinderlich. --Marsupium (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Es gibt genug unbeschriebene Bilder wo Du Dich engagieren könntest. --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Das ist unsachlich. --Marsupium (talk) 04:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Sterlbilder[edit]

Hallo Trzęsacz, kannst Du bitte mal schauen? Danke --Flag of Switzerland.svg Frze > talk 09:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Angelus(talk) 22:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I have fixed the link of the source. Kind regards. --Angelus(talk) 22:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked 1 day
The reason for the block is Attacks on other people like this and this are not done. Time to cool down a bit. I understand that you are angry but making comments like this and calling other people's work vandalisme is not okey. I hope you understand that and that you can start fresh tomorrow when you are hopefully cooled down. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | Català | Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

bruun rasmussen[edit]

HELLO! Please provide this image in high resolution. 853/334: George Dawe, style of, first half 19th century: Portrait of Tsar Alexander I of Russia [1] 853/121: Karel van Mander (III), attributed to, 17. century: Portrait of King Christian IV. [2]

After . --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Maybe now, November 28th, you can place these images?

here and here --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks/

File:The Hunted Slaves by Richard Ansdell 1861.jpg[edit]

Hello Trzęsacz. Would you not agree that the above file is a duplicate of File:Richard Ansdell - The Hunted Slaves - Google Art Project.jpg? Green Giant (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Green Giant, the color of both files is many differend. The Google Art Project-file has not nice colours ( its to red). --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Then perhaps redirect the Google one to your upload? Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
How and why? --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I don't see much point having different versions unless the artist painted two versions. Since the difference is more down to software than anything else I think we should only keep the one that is closest to the actual painting. I was intially thinking COM:DUPE might apply but the colours are different so it would probably be a regular deletion under COM:D#Redundant/bad quality. Green Giant (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
There are paintings in much double and multiple copies at Commons. But this is not a problem. Who knows exactly how the paintings look like in real life? --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough, as long as it is just two copies. However, i would appreciate it if you could put a note to link the two files so people will know that they are of the same painiting at least. Green Giant (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
My uploaded image has a link. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Ah I must have missed that, thank you anyway. Green Giant (talk) 21:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Leonardo da Vinci Virgin of the Rocks (National Gallery London).jpg[edit]

Habe mich hier über Dein danken gefreut und Du hast Post. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

{{category redirect}}[edit]

For longer existing categories, we would generally use the template {{category redirect}} rather than delete them. This allows the cats to be found in lookups.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I know. However, there are at least three artists with this name. Of these, two at Commons; David Cox the elder and David Cox (Junior). Therefore, the category name David Cox (artist) is non-specific. --Trzęsacz (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Bonhams & dezoomify[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you uploaded some images of paintings from the Bonhams site recently. I am wondering, did you use dezoomify on these and if so, what is the base url for the images? I can't get dezoomify to work with Bonhams. Or is there another way to access the full-resolution image? Thank you for all of your uploads, they are wonderful contributions! Thanks for any help! Laura1822 (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Laura1822, Bonhams files are not with dezoomify or other zoom-functions. You must cut the stert from the Image-Url.
example:

http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/18783/lot/119/
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg&width=640&height=480&halign=l0&valign=t0&autosizefit=0
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg

much fun and greetings, --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I never thought it could be so simply! obviously I forgot to look at the url! Sorry for not responding sooner, haven't been on Commons in a few days. Laura1822 (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Trzęsacz[edit]

File:Caspar David Friedrich - Fenster mit Blick auf den Park (ca.1810-11).jpg s. File:Window-Looking-over-the-Park.jpg 🍷🌙 --Oursana (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt sind sie nicht mehr gleich hier. Die Eremitage hat eine neue Webseite und stellt die Bilder jetzt größer ein. Ist aber - glaube ich - noch nicht fertig. Leider verlinken jetzt alle alten Referenzlinks ins Nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Du hast schneller repariert als ich den nächsten aufschreiben konnte.--Oursana (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Es sind jetzt schon erheblich mehr Bilder online als letztens. Das da oben verlinkte Bild ist von hier. So groß findet man sonst nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
smb.museum auf Erwachsene.., bisschen zu spät. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
click 🎅; ich hab Dir gemailt.--Oursana (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Guck mal morgen. Hab ihn schon gesehen und empfehle ihn Dir sehr. In B läuft er bestimmt auch. Er gefiel mir viel besser als zum KHM. Ist OmU. Du hörst wirklich gute Bildbesprechungen. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Danke. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
und.. ich schreib Dir noch, kann aber Abend werden. --Oursana (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Anton Goubau[edit]

Thanks for pointing me to these additional sources. I am still trying to figure out how to make the zoom-thing work. FRAYK (talk) 10:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Here is a beautiful page for many zoom functions for Wikicommons. Maybe you can translate from German. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Kassel[edit]

Hello, Trzęsacz! Prompt loading mechanism high resolution pictures from the site http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de. Thank you very much for your help.

File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PatHadley (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rosa Bonheur - Lion (The lock out).jpg[edit]

Hi, Trzęsacz, what is the exact description to this file? A lock out it can hardly be, I suggest meant is a Lookout Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, thanks for the note. I've corrected the title in „Lion (The look out)“, according to Sotheby's. --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Joachim Patinier[edit]

Hi Trzęsacz, I have created this subcategory with the real name of the artist (Joachim Patinier) to put together works rightly attributed to Joachim Patinier himself. A lot of works in category Patinir are not from him. It's the reason why a have created also subcategories Attribuée à Joachim Patinier (wrong or dubious attribution), Atelier de Joachim Patinier (Joachim Patinier workshop), and Disciple de Joachim Patinier (Follower of Joachim Patinier).

NB : Joachim Patinir is in fact the bad mame : it is the flemish prononciation of Patinier (« fabriquant de patins » in Wallonie).

TG 642 (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi TG 642, the right name is Patinir, see Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp nl, fr, en. So please revert your edits and if you have any references you could use Commons:Categories for discussion--Oursana (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Trzęsacz, Well, this is a controversy : see Base de données BALaT (Belgian Art Links and Tools) : Dominique Allart, Patinier, Joachim, in Dictionnaire des peintres belges.. Also, two important works of this painter (Le baptême du Christ of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Wien, inv. 981 and Les tentations de saint Antoine of Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, inv. P 1615.) are signed : « IOACHIM / D. / PATINIER ».

As I told you before Patinir is the flemish (dutch) pronunciation of the wallon (french) word Patinier (maker of "patin"). Your reference in Koninklijk Museum vor Schone Kunsten is Patinir is because Antwerpen (Anvers) is a flemish city. Many referencies of this artist is Patinier : see for exemple Kunsthistorisches Museum of Wien. In fact, countries keep the easiest form of the name to use it easily with the current language they use: Patinir in UK and Spain ; Patinier in France (a widespread family name in northern part of France and in Belgium), Belgium, Austria...

This controversy is not very important (Quentin Metsys in France become Quinten Massys, Metsys, Matsijs or Massijs somewhere else); the big point here was to create a subcategory to put together media of the works realy made by Patinier/Patinir. So, if you don't like subcategory:Joachim Patinier you can change the name of it to Œuvres de l'artiste, or something like this, but please don't remove it. Thank you.

--TG 642 (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Different notations can be found at many old masters. But here at Commons there must be only one category. Category:Joachim Patinier is not a sub cat of Category:Joachim Patinir. It is a duplicate wit a other notation. You can rename or move categories to a other name and one is than a rederict for the other. What to whom I do not care. Maybe Commons:Categories for discussion is the right way. --Trzęsacz (talk) 09:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Vincent Willem van Gogh 036.jpg[edit]

Hi !

First of all, please be kinder in your comments. Yes I'm sick, I have a bronchitis, thanks for asking, but I will not delete my account for this :)

I think it is better, when we have multiple pictures of the same painting, to have a category for the painting, put all categories such as Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum or Category:Vineyards in art put on the category (since they apply to the object), and on the file, just put the category of the object and categories relevant to the file, such as Category:Google Art Project works by Vincent van Gogh (not applicable in that case).

The advantages I see :

  1. in Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum for instance, the painting appears only once and not four times. It means that when you add sub-categories and files of Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum, you have exactly the number of paintings in Commons.
  2. if someone find a new category applicable to the painting, they have to add it once, in Category:The_Red_Vineyard, and not in every file of Commons about the painting.

Have a nice day :) Léna (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Apologies, but Category:The Red Vineyard is not a categorie name, it is mess. Get well soon. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)