User talk:Motopark/acrhive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Images from the film 'Virus' directed by Kinji Fukasaku

Image:Virus-film80-00.jpg Image:Virus-film80-01.jpg

Hi, Why did you delete these two pictures ? This movie is in public domain.

please read reason from log
  • 20:46, 23 August 2008 Kved (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Virus-film80-01.jpg" ‎ (In category Unknown as of 13 August 2008; no source)
  • 20:46, 23 August 2008 Kved (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Virus-film80-00.jpg" ‎ (In category Unknown as of 13 August 2008; no source)

that's why they was deleted--Motopark (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Motopark.jpg

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 09:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

You can delete this version, it's duplicate --Motopark 16:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


TonyIcKs about Aquilon's band covers

I am a member of the band and all cover copyright are to Aquilon band.. why i can show this pictures?? (scuse me for my bad english, im french ^^)
images are:
Aquilon intramedia.jpg
Aquilon immobile.jpg
Les Ombres De Quatre Murs.jpg

Tonyicks 23:15, 19 March 2008 FRANCE

Please ask more info in Village pump, there you can get more information--Motopark 02:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:1206-03-03mmarkers18.jpg

Hello. First, thanks for warning me. Then please excuse me for my poor english. About this image, in fact I've found it on the english Wikipedia, here. It was apparently licensed under GFDL so I thought I could upload it on commons just like I've already done several times. I used to use this tool to make the upload easier and automatically, there has't been any problem with specifiing the author or other things before. Would you know how I may correct it? Thank you. Xic667 14:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

poster of rahe bipayan

hi, rahe bipayan is a TV Series in iran and I am Producer of this program. and all rights belongs to me. why I cant use this image in wikimedia commons? I must add more information? please help me!I wait for your answer. thanks for your kind azizi 11:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please ask help from Village pump--Motopark 12:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


Eglise de Colleret.JPG

I am the auteur of Eglise de Colleret with my camera but i have a probleme whith commons. can you help me. a french speker!!!! Chatsam le 14 janvier 2008 à 18h10 (cet)

you may found help from [village pump], left navigation--Motopark 17
12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
This may get some help - thanks --Herby talk thyme 18:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
i speak english so a "spanish cow" i dont understand "village pump" sorry ~~Chatsam~~le 16/01/2008 à 13h13 (cet)
on the left you can found it--Motopark 15:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

again

hello, you told me: ask help from Village pump. ّّْْI ask this:

I have uploaded a image poster of rahe bipayan. this image deleted. rahe bipayan is a TV Series in iran and I am Producer of this program. and all rights belongs to me. why I cant use this image in wikimedia commons? I must add more information for reupload it? azizi 09:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

this is answer to my question:

Yes, you should donate the images to have them stay here. But by doing so, you should consider that anyone will have the right to use the images, not only you. --User:G.dallorto 15:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I khow that and I regulations for Copyright use and I have already granted the right for anyone to use the pictures for any purpose. what I should do? please tell me.azizi 05:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Eglise belloy porte sud.JPG

what the probleme with Image Eglise belloy porte sud. i dont can change my page of "discussion" Chatsam le 01/02/2008 à 14h36(cet)

Deleting of own discussion are not allowed--Motopark 15:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Schiavo2.jpg

Hi, I guess it is clear... Otherwise, please help me because I'm new with this. Image:Schiavo2.jpg has the direction where I got this pic. Thanks, --Epiovesan 08:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

See how the information has been created in other pictures--Motopark 15:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Why did you restore my clutter?

I had cleared out some old stuff off my Talk page, all of which involved an old photo licensing issue and a problematic editor, and you put it back -- what's up with that? I just want to clear out that mess. -BC aka Callmebc 21:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

cleaqning of discussion page are not allowed, only archiving are allowed. --Motopark 21:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

RAR files

They have all been deleted and the uploader indefinitely blocked. Thanks for spotting them. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image:ISR-HW99.png

I added source information. Can you check and confirm on my talk page that I did it correctly? Shalom Yechiel 23:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding talk pages, archiving etc

People are allowed to delete warnings from their own user talk page if they really like. I've done this a few times and there is no policy on this at all. Archiving it is a good idea, but it's not mandatory. So I'd suggest not reverting people on that anymore. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

BTW, since you asked the proper way to do it is to use the "Move" function. But I wouldn't concern yourself too much. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

wHY

Hello. I used the image Imagen:ChristinaAguileraAin'tNoOtherManLiveDVD.jpg because it is in wikimedia's archives. The image is called Image:AguileraDublin5.jpg.

You must add source where you have taken the picture and we can check--Motopark 20:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Adeyto pictures licensing

Hi there. You marked all the pictures I uploaded as "copyright violation" which makes me really laugh because if I, the artist, owner and creator of those images can's decide if I license them free, than who can? Isn't it enough to license the images as GFDL? What's the point? Is it necessary to make the images "public domain"? By the way, I already emailed the declaration of consent to the permissions-commons....this said, wikipedia can really be a headache... ARA Laboratories 17:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Commons are not right place to store those pictures, you must store them to local wikipedias where are the articles also--Motopark 18:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Please re-read the above comment closer: the images are hers, and she is licensing them under GFDL, which is free. There is just a lack of proper confirmation that she is the author, which will hopefully be solved soon. --AVRS 18:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
well, I was automatically redirected by Wikipedia itself to Commons, when I uploaded the very first picture. And it looked like Commons is the place where the pictures belong! In order to let the pictures in Commons, do I need to change the license to "public domain"? If so, I don't mind doing it...and I'll uploade future pictures to the local wikipedias then. ARA Laboratories 18:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

There has been some mistake.

Dear Motopark, you have written me that I have removed a problem tag. This is not true. Instead, I have supplied the information needed for these pictures. Please, don't tell me that you've put those poor pictures back on death row... Thanks.

One example--Motopark 15:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

My Image

Please do not revert the modification I made to the page for the image I had uploaded. [1]. I had to add a license. Alan.ca 03:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

?

To which image do you refer to? --mac 15:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

There are plenty of, example this--Motopark 15:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Tagging non commons content

Hi - thanks for picking up some pages that are out of project scope. In general any mainspace page without images or other media content may be tagged for speedy deletion rather than as a licensing issues. Equally a message on the creators page using {{Project scope}} can be used to inform them. Thanks a lot for the work, regards --Herby talk thyme 08:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for info--Motopark 15:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Brenda Song images

Excuse me i do not know why my images are up for speedy deletion when know one even reviewed my work.Can you please tell me what i have done and why is my image up for speedy deletion when know one was bothered to first review my flick'r page and work to decide either the image is my work and is not against wikipedia copyright issues.Thank you.FrogMiller 15:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

And if that is true then howcome all of the images posted on flick'r that are used in wikipedia pages like Image:Miley Cyrus.jpg have @all right reserved and i knwo that you may not know this but that means that the flick'r user has all rights reserved and you can not have it as a candidate for speedy deletion withput reviewing my work and then deciding if it should be deleted.If that is true then post wikipedia common pictures should be deleted including Image:Miley Cyrus.jpg althpugh it has been reviewed.Flick'r does not say all right reserved of you were a user you would know that becuase the other choices are some right reserved to the user and no right reseved to the user.So i suggest that you review my pages and then decide that and i suggest that you stop picking on Brenda Song images and start looking at otehr pages from flick'r that you suppodely claim (flicker says all rights reserved) but it seems like you are letting soem images pass and the Brenda Song images all get deleted without even beig reviewed and i have noticed that emily osment's page has the same thing like miley cyrus's page and raven symone which has a source link that doesnt even show the image or claim anything.Thank You.FrogMiller 15:54 11 March 2008 (UTC)

reason are flicker says all rights reserved, no flicker status checking in history--Motopark 15:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

A couple of comments

The work you are doing is very worthwhile & you are learning much. Looking ahead can I ask you to use the "edit summary" where you can. I realise that sometimes it is not easy but something there can be very helpful to others. I also wonder if you should not put {{babel}} information on your user page? Again it may be helpful to others. Thanks for what you do & if I can help do let me know, --Herby talk thyme 12:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Why do you want to delete the cover of my CD? FYI We have freedom of speech in this country.

Deletion?

Why do you want to delete the cover of my CD? FYI We have freedom of speech in this country. --Czpddz (talk) 19:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

please read here why album covers are not allowed. --Motopark ( ) 19:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

OK - however, I own the original art from Mikee. If necessary I can remove the text that says that is a CD cover.

Image:Nirvana album cover.jpg up for speedy

I came across the image Nirvana album cover.jpg which you tagged with speedy delete because of "fair use" when the image's contents are not eligible for copyright under US copyright law. See en:WP:PD#Fonts. The image was up for deletion, but was kept. Because of the debatability of the image's copyright status, I've removed the speedy tag. You may re-list the image for deletion, however. (Read: This is not an obvious copyright violation). Cheers, Cavenbatalk to me 02:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for information --Motopark ( ) 02:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anarcho Cover.jpg

Why did you delete this image? The permission was given by the label and I send it to permissions-de@wikimedia.org a few months ago. --Lipstar (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Please read here the reason, because different countries will have different laws, you must store album cover to local wikipedias.--Motopark ( ) 16:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Def FX album cover images

Why were these images deleted? I uploaded them so the wikipedia discography could be complete, so how are the circumstances different? Looking at the page again [[2]], I can see that two of the images were released by different publishers compared with extant and apparently allowed images. But the cover for Surge EP was also published by Phantom records, so surely if they have released images for all their other Def FX releases then they would have for this one too?

Also: Does it make any difference that the scans were of personal, autographed copies? They were in faint gold ink in the scans, just visible.

Cheers!

Please read instructions why place of cover pages are not in Commons Commons:Image casebook#Album covers. Please store your album cover to local wikipedia because different countries will have different laws and local wikipedias will have different rules. --Motopark ( ) 14:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

NYGTH.jpg

How do other people put copyrighted material on Wikipedia. How to you get the permission to use logos and pictures? Plus its not an album cover! ( ) 14:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

with OTRS-permission are sometimes possible to store, if you found album cover, please do a delete request--Motopark (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

cd cover

i took the photo, edited the cover; and released it into the public domain here on commons. Is it really that hard to release something into public domain nowadays that people question wether it's actually you?

I do however need some help. Images i uploaded here, here, here, here, here, and here, i want them all deleted, as i have no use for them anymore LukeTheSpook (talk) 22:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Please write to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard this and some administrator can help you, I don't have rights to delete.--Motopark (talk) 03:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mercedes Sosa -La voz de la zafra -1962.jpg

Hi Motopark. I'm writing you, about the image above, because you ask for some kind of statement from the author. That's not right. As it was said in the licence, the picture is in the public domain 25 years after its publication. That's PD-AR.Photo rule. So, what kind of author's agreement are you asking for? When the 25 years passed, automatically the image is in the public domain; the picture was published on 1962, so it is in the public domain since 1987. In the same way, for example for a book, you don't need any agreement of the author's descendants, when 70 years passed from the death of the author. Can you show me what is the rule you are calling here? Kind regards, --Roblespepe (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok to me, thnaks.--Motopark (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Drop Trio album covers

The album covers for the Drop Trio albums were designed, created and published by ME. I own the rights to that artwork both as the visual artist and because when these albums were released I was also the bassist / songwriter in the band and have full rights to the music contained in the albums as well.

I therefore have the right to do what I please with the artwork, as it is my original work. Further, the band is in full agreement of using my artwork at will.

Ninobatista (talk) 21:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: rotating the picture

Hi Motopark,

yes, I saw that the pictures needed to be rotated. Usually I auto rotate them before uploading but it seems that this time the GPS program messed around. Oh!, and thanks for telling :-)

Cheers, --Ogre (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Moved from Image:Drioux Galvan Enter The Dragon Cover.jpg

I could not confirm the fact that this is an album cover. --Kimsə (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

In this side are this picture listed as album--Motopark (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the link, Motopark. Yes, it looks like a CD cover. I googled the name and couldn't find anything, amazon.com doesn't carry their CDs either. So, it was hard to find any info. Thanks --Kimsə (talk) 03:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Album cover

It's not a real album cover - it's a game. Take a look at the rules and you can make your own! Cheers, ˉanetode╦╩ 07:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

About images.

Sorry for the copyrighted picture, I didn't see it on the bottom of the site. What if the site is a free blog, and doesn't contain that 'copyright' bit on the bottom? I found a site like that, seems free to use a picture, but I want to take pre-cautions before jumping the gun and uploading. Should I just upload it anyways with the source and such so you guys can look into it? Thanks for any help.

you can search from Flicker pictures than can upload to Commons. also with search tool you can try to find free picture --Motopark (talk) 17:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

AVRIL

WHY YOU DELETE MY IMAGE I DID ALL RIGHT!!--Vitor mazuco (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok i just put the permission!!--Vitor mazuco (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn, 2007.jpg

I have fully-protected this image for 2 weeks because of upload warring it appears you have participated in. Please discuss on the image talk page any outstanding issues. I will unprotect that image when the dispute is resolved.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

File:That Girl - It (at the time).jpg

Please stop. If you can't piece out why your tag is utterly inappropriate, then your judgment is unfit to apply such tags. Thank you, ˉanetode╦╩ 04:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barbara rush.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Barbara rush.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Barbara rush.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 01:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Motopark!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Fotos

Saludos. Las fotos de Rick Rude y la de Orlando Jordan las subí siendo un trabajo derivado de otras dos fotos, las cuales tenían permiso para que las subiera. únicamente, enlacé a donde ponía subir una nueva versión de la foto y seguí los pasos que me dijeron, misma licencia, nomrbe y demás. Por la foto de la ECW, no sabía que eso se consideraba violación del copyright. Saludos --Techarrow (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand your language, english language please--Motopark (talk) 15:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sobre a imagem UnibutantaLogo.gif

Olá,

Uma imagem postada por mim, File:UnibutantaLogo.gif, foi marcada como infração de direito autoral... Bom, esta imagem estava no Site do Unibutanta, e eu precisava de um logotipo do Universitário para para representar a marca corporativa atual... Alguns artigos escritos por mim dependiam desta imagem... Eu obtive uma autorização verbal para utilizar a imagem, tendo sido aluno de lá. Enfim, como eu procedo agora?

Att. Prppedro (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand your language, english language please--Motopark (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Damage sins of our fathers.jpg

You marked as a "copyright violation" an image, "Damage sins of our fathers.jpg", which I uploaded and to which I own the copyright. I am the artist and have never transferred copyright ownership. You should have tried to contact me first and determined who the copyright holder was before tagging this as a copyright violation. Why didn't you? --Potanka (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:GoosensSidonieandStravinsky.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:GoosensSidonieandStravinsky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GoosensSidonieandStravinsky.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Please replace an image with a better version

I submitted the file http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:AnttiJuhaniKoskinen.jpg and now noticed that it has been taken over to commons to this file http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AnttiJuhaniKoskinen.jpg by you (thank you).

I would mow like to replace the first image with a better version with a higher resolution, which I uploaded here: http://www.iworld.de/~juha_krapinoja/AnttiJuhaniKoskinen.jpg however, as a wikipedia-newbie, I do not have the faintest idea, what I should do in order to get the image replaced. Could you please help me? Should you have any questions, you can find my direct contact data at http://www.iworld.de/~juha_krapinoja/

Thank you. --JuKra59 (talk) 18:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

You must store your new picture with OTRS-permission to new picturename and when it's ready, you change picture name in the articel where you will use this picture--Motopark (talk) 19:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Ribbon2.jpg

This image is one that I created for "Change4Change" use. I am the sole creator and owner and retain the rights to use this image. I chosen to use it in the article for Vicci Laine and to release it Public Domain. Thank you for your help. I would like your permission to remove the box for speedy deleation or if you will please remove it. Thanks again. Baileysmom (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

only text only logos are allowed in commons, you can store perhaps to local wikipedia if their rules accept it.--Motopark (talk) 03:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Standertskjold.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Standertskjold.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Standertskjold.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Cecil (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:JaySook2003.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JaySook2003.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:JaySook2003.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 11:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Päivämäärän muoto

Hei! Kannattaa käyttää päivämäärän merkitsemisessä kansainvälistä ISO 8601 -standardin mukaista VVVV-KK-PP-muotoa. (Esim. 20.6.2009 merkitään 2009-06-20.) Tällöin päivämäärä näkyy aina käyttäjälle aina sillä kielellä, jonka käyttäjä on itselleen valinnut. (Ks. esim. päivämäärä tässä kuvassa suomeksi, englanniksi ja saksaksi.) --Apalsola tc 12:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

kiitoksia infosta--Motopark (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Question

Motopark, In the Wikipedia manual it states one should ask questions to more experinced people, and that's why I ask you - how can I upload book covers without copyright infringement? I mean, I think the authors and wikipedia have a lot to gain from that. user Arte&Ficção

Please ask in COM:VP--Motopark (talk) 00:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Helppoheikki

Hei, kuvasi helppoheikistä vuodelta 1983 oli lisätty artikkeliin Rukkas-Antti. Se poistettiin, koska ei voitu osoittaa, että se ilmeisestä yhteyksistä huolimatta esittäisi Rukkas-Anttia. Mitenkähän on? Jos toimit fi.Wikipediassa, vastaa mieluummin sinne keskustelusivulleni fi:Keskustelu käyttäjästä:Ulrika. --Ufinne (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Milice

Hi,

you deleted two of my images. Could you explain why ? They were self-made and did not violate any rights, as they belonged to a defunct and banned organization. I think this is a mistake and I'll upload them again. thanks JJ Georges (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons--Motopark (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
What is the proper tag for defunct (and banned) paramilitary organisations ? There are plenty of such insignas on commons. Moreover, this is a flag, not a logo. I'll also appreciate to know if any of the images I uploaded pose any kind of problem. JJ Georges (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
there will read File:Gammamilice.gif ‎ ({{Information |Description={{en|1={{Information |Description= Logo of the collaborationist Milice (1943-1944) |Source=I created this work entirely by myself. This version was redrawn and is also now public domain. |Date= |Author=[[User:Wedineinheck|We)

Please ask more infos from COM:VP--Motopark (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

So this is misundestanding (english is not my first language). I actually meant "insignia". JJ Georges (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:D.Bisbal.jpg

Can you give me some extra information about this tool Adobe Photoshop Lightroom? What does it show other image and EXIF viewers not show to me? --Martin H. (talk) 12:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

it show a lot of more information from exif-data than some other my used softwares, irfanview or paint shop pro. Very usefull software in those cases.--Motopark (talk) 13:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Please download and try--Motopark (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Scodanibbio images

Dear Motopark, today I have uploaded six images (one was a mistake: Reily and Scodanibbio.jpg) under permission from the holder of its rights Stefano Scodanibbio himself. I have wrote the article about him and in the same time was writing him, asking for permission to upload the selected images: Sanguineti and Scodanibbio at Monte Conero in 2006.jpg; Riley and Scodanibbio 2006.jpg; Cage and Scodanibbio at Florence in 1992..jpg; Rodrigo Garcia and Stefano Scodanibbio.jpg; Nono & Scodanibbio, Freiburg, 1983.jpg and Stefano Scodanibbio Forli 2007 (1).jpg. The permission was imediatly given in his fist answer, and confirmed in the second, after I clarified the Wikimedia Commons terms.

I have selected the licence that seamed to be the right one regarding Stefanos's permission for the use of his images, but there is the possibility that I did something wrong in the selection of the licence type. I admit that I 'm not used to doing this and may have done something wrong, but the permission for FULL USE is by NO DOUBT given. I have sent an email to OTRS with the transcription of our conversation (except some personal remarks) so that you can see the licence to use these images in Wikimedia Commons was given. I here show you the mail again:

I have wrote to Stefano Scodanibbio, who is the holder of these images rights, asking for permission to use in the portuguese Wikipedia article under the same name: (http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefano_Scodanibbio) The permission was granted by him in his answering emails, a conversation which I will fully transpose here.

First letter from me to Stefano:

" to stefano@stefanoscodanibbio.com date 19 August 2009 06:24 subject Wikipedia mailed-by gmail.com


hide details 19 Aug (5 days ago)


Reply

Follow up message Dear Stefano,

I'm writing in English because it's easier for me to express myself fully without unnecessary delays visiting the dictionary. Actualy I'm portuguese, as you may have noticed by my name, and I have a reasonable degree of understanding of italiano, in answering me you may write in your native language. The reason I'm writing is due to my most reacent article in the portugese Wikipedia about you. I have writen the article but wanted to ad some images of yourself so I could publish it in colors (it's not yet published, it's still in code on my computer). I based my investigation in your webpage and found there some interesting images of you alone and with some other great composers. If you fell curious about me you may look into this article so you know what my style is: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peridéxion

I'm here to ask your permission to use some of these images published in you website. Which of them (the ones with others) can I use? And, if you fell favorable to an article in Wikipedia with your image, I also wanted to ask if you could point me to some recent photographs of you in concert that I could use.

If you accept this and give me permission to use your image in this Wikipedia article (your image isn't in any database related to Wikipedia), I will need some proof that the use of the images was permited. If I can't prove your permission, if you may give it, the images will be taken out of the database. I guess an email from your website allowing me to use your images should be sufficient.

Thank you in advance

Sara "

Stefano's first answer:

" reply-to Stefano Scodanibbio <stefano@stefanoscodanibbio.com> to Sara Soares <saracsoares@gmail.com> date 20 August 2009 11:53 subject Re: Wikipedia


hide details 20 Aug (4 days ago)


Reply

Follow up message Dear Sara, thank you very much for your interest! You can choose the photos you like, just mention the photographer when there is one.

(...)

stefano "

Second letter from me to Stefano:

"

to Stefano Scodanibbio <stefano@stefanoscodanibbio.com> date 21 August 2009 14:54 subject Re: Wikipedia mailed-by gmail.com


hide details 21 Aug (3 days ago)


Reply

Follow up message Dear Stefano,

In order to use the photographs of your self and fellow composers in Wikipedia, it's needed, acording to the policies of Wikimedia, that the rights of these pictures are fully given. This is because the pictures uploaded in Wikimedia Commons are available for any one to use and change. Of corse no one changes pictures unless it's needed or may improve the picture, like the blurring of an offensive area (censorship) and retouching. Any picture that is harmfully altered will eventually be erased and most alterations are fully discussed within the community. Never the less, for a picture to be uploaded there are some points that the uploader has to be able to accept, as you can read in the uploading forms:

"All users of files found on Wikimedia Commons must be given the Four Freedoms:

  1. The freedom to use and perform the work.
  2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information.
  3. The freedom to redistribute copies.
  4. The freedom to create and distribute derivative works. 

Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. In addition, claims of fair use are explicitly NOT and will NEVER be permitted on Commons. Please only upload files that either:

   * are in the public domain in the source country (author died more than 70 years ago) and in the U.S., or that
   * are explicitly covered by a license which grants the Four Freedoms."

(...)

Do you agree?

(...)

Bacci

Sara "

Stefano's second answer:

" stefano@stefanoscodanibbio.com to Sara Soares <saracsoares@gmail.com> date 24 August 2009 13:32 subject Re: Wikipedia


hide details 13:32 (6 hours ago)


Reply

Follow up message

Dear Sara, I agree on everything. Feel free to use the pictures you want without any intervent of mine, please. Thanks for appreciating my music. yours,

stefano "

If this is not enough proof, and you need to confirm it, please write directly to him and ask if he did or did not give me the permission I'm exposing here. You may even forward this mail so he may tell you that it's all true.

Thanks

Sara

Please tell me what is wrong in all this and what I need to do so that the images won't be unjustly deleted. Thanks. SaraCSF (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

You must send OTRS-permission, because google images are not accepted source and I can't find any information about your mentioned permission.--Motopark (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Permission must send permissions-commons@wikimedia.org address--Motopark (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Mashiprcords Picture all deleted

Please do it back .Im from Germany and its my own work. Greetings Smi

Please send OTRS-permission and after then they will restore--Motopark (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Renner Brand Logo.jpg

Passing by just to say Commons accept any logos who are simple enough consisting of simple letter or typeface or simple shapes. See Threshold of originality and Image_casebook Trademarks. That's why we have the Category:Logos, {{PD-text}}, {{PD-textlogo}}, {{PD-shape}} licenses and the {{trademark}} warning. So I'm gonna revert your edition. If you have any complaint about the file, please, open a DR. Best regards Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 04:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Jussikinnunen3.jpg

Hei, Fi.wikipedian ylläpitäjien ilmoitustaululla on kerrottu että kuva esitää Jari Luostarista eikä Jussi Kinnusta. Tekisitkö jotakin. --Ufinne (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Kaverin nimi on ilmeisesti Jari Luostari, ei Jari Luostarinen, eikä ainakaan Jussi Kinnunen. Basisti on vaihtunut jossain välissä. Tässä kuvassa on Jussi Kinnunen (toinen vasemmalta). Vaihdoin kuviin tiedot. On tietysti mahdollista ettei tuo ole Jari Luostarikaan, vaan kyseisellä keikalla on ollut joku vieraileva basisti. Mutta Jussi Kinnunen hän ei missään tapauksessa ole.--Tanár (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
kiitoksia infosta, tehdään muutokset--Motopark (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Help with logos

Hi, I've notice that you kind of have an eye for the trademarked logos. Since I've already uploaded over 500 golf photographs and I think majority of them depicts some kind of trademarked logotypes (just to mention Solheim Cup logos on the players caps, sponsors logos on clothing items, sport equipment, etc) I'd like to ask you for help with tagging those which require speedy removal. They can be found under this category: Category:LPGA photos taken by Wojciech Migda. I'd like to also make sure if I should bother uploading the remaining ones - I guess I'm not halfway there. There are also numerous photographs by Keith Allison, which me and other wikipedians have transfered from flickr (Category:Photos_taken_by_Keith_Allison) - it seems that they need instant review as well. I'll start tagging them asap when I find some spare time. Thanks, Wmigda (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, please ask in COM:AN, perhaps somebody knows--Motopark (talk) 18:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I think you are aware that I have no permissions to post there ? Wmigda (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I found the button, sorry for bothering Wmigda (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

your a fool, if you didnt try to be Mr Big and do fifty thousand things at once and actuality reviewed some of the shit you did, then you would have realized that nominating the picture I uploaded , [that was made by my business], for a speedy deletion was a stupid thing to do.

Re: My uploads

Thanks for the catch. Tad embarrassing given my recent admin work...--Nilfanion (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

File:RNB.jpg

I created this image, because it was erased? Vitorvicentevalente (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Sabine

Picture of Sabine is for fair use.--Gospodar svemira (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Please send OTRS-permission to this picture, because there are so many copies available in internet--Motopark (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Leifwager.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leifwager.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! ¿…? 17:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Out of scope

Hi, first of all thanks for you work marking copyright violation and other problematic images. I have noticed you marked many images uploaded by User:Philip Fikry for speedy deletion with the reason "out of scope". Indeed those images are rather unusable and looks like humoristic interpretation or actual persons, but "out of scope" in not a reason for speedy unless image was uploaded with clear vandalism intentions. In some rare cases after normal deletion discussion "out of scope" image are kept, simply because new facts or possible usage can be found. Please rather requesting for speedy list "out of scope" image as regular DR. Best regards and keep it up --Justass (talk) 17:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I can change reason "no information about 7 days", is it better ?--Motopark (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
No need, already deleted, no sources and no evidence of willingness to provide such by uploader --Justass (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Not sure why images are flagged...

Can you maybe explain to me why my images are being taken down? I am new to this, and apparently don't quite get it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. DFSClaire (talk) 22:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You must send OTRS-permission from those pictures to get them to Commons--Motopark (talk) 03:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PTXMII.jpg =

Sorry but there is an OTRS ticket OTRS Ticket#2006082110002647: I don't understand! :( --Xavier121 08:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
nobody has verified and added the ticket, like in File:Boss der Bosse.jpg this picture, please contact to some OTRS-person to solve the problem example ask in COM:AN.--Motopark (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Help prevent deletion of file

Pleasr refer there and help me better my use of WikiPedia and its Commons.

Thanks 82.166.53.7 (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

send the permission with email to the address that are in talk page--Motopark (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
I did so. Please read further in my support page. I was granted all permission of using the images from their owner - plz help me better my access to image use througout Wikipedia. I have sent email noting my full acknowledgement of (surrendering) rights of use regarding the 2 images relating to the article 951 to which I only wished to add 2 pictures, donated to WikiPedia Project fully by the owners of the images. Ooh (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

It's Raining Mail.

(Halleluja?)
Please see and respond if you can. /Orrling Ooh (talk) 19:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

sorry, I can't help in this case, please ask from Village pump COM:VP, or from admins COM:AN they knows--Motopark (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

===Not sure why images are flagged...and then erased after copyright was submitted ===

Hello, You flagged an image and requested proof of copyright? I emailed proof to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and pic was still deleted. Can you help? Subject was Benjie Bollox Ubastiff (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

When you have sended permission, and it's okay, then administator will return your picture--Motopark (talk) 15:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Disruption

Tagging images with nsd when the source is clearly given is disruptive. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

sometimes this site source links has not been worked, thats why I have added nsd, but now the link work--Motopark (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
It is still very disruptive. Please revert where you added nsd without good reason. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Look here: you even reverted! Really outrageous. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

In order to reduce the patrolling backlog. Regarding the above: someone obviously not searched the deletion archives [3], soone or later all that images will go. However in this case the tag npd is the correct alternative. There is nothing on that site that allows realy free reuse, but thats required. --Martin H. (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks from this feature, I try to study to use it--Motopark (talk) 01:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Victims_of_Circumstance.png

Hey I saw that you removed my album art image for 'Victims of Circumstance'. I did not infringe on a copywrite, I created that image for my band Dark Iris and that is the album art for our debut album. I don't know how you got the idea that I infringed on a copywrite. It doesn't even have a copywrite on it yet, but I will get one on it as soon as the album has been released. I created that myself so your claim is false. If I reupload it, will you leave it be next time? Thank you. --Larry52333 (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Please send OTRS-permission to get the album cover to Commons.--Motopark (talk) 12:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


my bad

yeah that artwork for decade prob was copywrited but i wasnt sure so i said it wasnt. my bad.--Stevedietrich (talk) 21:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

EarthAngels.jpg

Hello Motopark, how are you. Sorry to disturb, but i have just received your warning message about the licensing of this picture. Christian Carrasco, the owner, has licenced it and as far as i know nobody else can edit it but tag it. Underneath the picture it reads "publicado bajo licencia Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0". Christian Carrasco is one of the members of the band. Thanks for your time, greetings. rafax (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

sourcelink don't work, please correct it. Nut if picture are stored to Facebook, facebook owns the picture--Motopark (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
oops, i didnt know about facebook's claiming rights, sorry about that. I'll see what can be done about it, im sure that christian does not know either, i'll email him so they can reconsider uploading more. I dont think its worth fixing the link now, what a shame, i should have known about it 'cos i have uploaded a few of mine as well. Thank you very much indeed, this is very upsetting. Cheers. rafax (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh my, how silly, because the band main page is opened, i got confused with being friends with one of the members, so thats why nobody else can access the pics, i have a mail though 'cos the poor man licensed all the pics he had, so i think i better use OTRS. I have read fb's privacy policy and it say that the uploader is the owner of the material as long as he has the rights. Thanks again, i'll fix it soon. Cheers. rafax (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello again, sorry to disturb, i'm being a pain. Because i dont want to disturb the owner of the pics and theres more i want to upload of this band and because the pics are licenced by him sharealike, i thought in sharing this one with my account which is wide opened and you'd get to see the license tab and the name of the owner. The only thing wrong is that you'd need a facebook account as well to check it and i dont know if it could be possible to do it this way. Thanks for your patience, you're doing a great job. rafax (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
OTRS-permission will sove this problem----
The only thing wrong is that by OTRS you still dont get to see the license tab, the owner and the pics if you dont have a facebook account and the owner does not seem to be interested, wants or does not know how to upload them, its me who's doing the job, and by not being able to check does not mean they are not free to use. The only thing needed is that someone with a fb account checks the license. Another issue is that i dont think that the man will be interested in applying the same permission for his whole account as the OTRS template suggests. Also, i've seen you've edited the pic adding that in face book would be read the copyright symbol, but their privacy policy explains that the rights are granted to the owner of the material uploaded, so the copyright symbol would only apply for the rights of the facebook project. Please, go and check about facebook's privacy policy to avoid this. Sorry for the mess, thank you very much indeed once more. rafax (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
In the end i talked to lobo and added him to my facebook account and shared the pic with him, but we never thought that being christian pics he is obviously the only one allowed to share with others. I have mailed christian with the links and explanations to OTRS so i hope he'll be sending the permission mail soon. I also asked him to move and license the pics in the band's main page which is opened to whoever that has a fb account in case OTRS dont work or doesn't want to release the whole album. Sorry about all the mess, my fault. Did you check about facebook's author rights policy? rafax (talk) 20:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
_Sorru I don't more, please ask from commons coffee room--Motopark (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I do not know how to delete a photo. I uploaded it incorrectly, if you want, you can delete it: theedgeofdiskoveri.jpg .Sorry about the misunderstanding. I'm new to this whole wikipedia thing lol.

My talk page

Hi. Can you please undo the changes you did to my talk page? The page is too long and it takes a while to load in my slow internet connection. I have to fix the rest of the images for which I got notices and its getting difficult to keep track.

I dont see a reason why I should keep the notices for the images which I have fixed the issues and the ones which has been deleted already. Thanks. --Sreejithk2000 (talk) 07:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You can undo yourself, or archive old ones, see how I have archived old ones--Motopark (talk) 07:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Since there are edits after you reverted my edits, I am unable to undo the change you did. If you can do that, I will be grateful. Else it will be tedious task for me. --Sreejithk2000 (talk) 08:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

What did I ever did to you

I'm trying to upload a picture from some time now and is always "copyright violation". I've got the owner to send a mail granting permission - still "copyright violation", i've got the owner to upload the file on flickr under a cc-by-sa license and now i've learned a new word: "flickr washing". You can send a mail to the owner of the site you claim "i've stole" the picture from (joytiz.com) and convince yourself. Thanks and please help me! --Sevi18 (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

You must send OTRS-permission, in your talkpage are instructions--Motopark (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

All of MY images

Hello, all the image I uploaded belong to me, therefore there is not authentication to provide. Can you remove your "SPEEDY DELETION" tags? They are not needed. It is MY property.

cover pictures need OTRS-permission, please send it--Motopark (talk) 07:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Album covers of Aleksander Mežek

Please, stop marking album covers of Aleksander Mežek for speedy deletion. I sent him an e-mail few hours ago. If he agrees with license, I will forward message to OTRS; otherwise I will mark all covers for speedy deletion by my self.

He's a self-promoter. We already had enough problems with him at Slovene Wikipedia. --Domen (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Album covers in Commons need OTRS-permiussion--Motopark (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Motopark!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Question about pictures

I got a message saying that the picture I uploaded was violating copyright. I followed the steps to upload it from Wikipedia since that's where the image is. And by the way, it is impossible to add an image since if you don't know the procedure it's really really difficult to follow all those steps. I tried many times and this is the only one I could upload. When using other files' articles to translate actors, the image can be used. But that doesn't work with the movies. Is there a way? Thanks for this info.

send OTRS-permission from picture--Motopark (talk) 07:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Durian - Sintel Paintover == Copyright violation?

Hi Motopark, why did you marked my upload ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Durian_-_Final_WIP_paintover.jpeg ) as copyright violation? As you can read on the picture it's "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0". And as you can read in the licensing description this means it's free to share. So, where is the problem? Greetings -- Jan Sende (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

It was watermarked, and watermark shall be removed--Motopark (talk) 09:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I can't remove the watermark, because the uploaded file is the original. --Jan Sende (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Re:File Tagging File:Bono as The Fly Cleveland 1992.jpg

I've emailed the author's permission to use the image on Wikimedia projects (CC-BY-SA-3.0) to the OTRS desk. Can I remove the tag that you added to the image yet? Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Please wait that some OTRS-person add permission to picture, it can take some time.--Motopark (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

OK, I just don't want someone to delete the image, since 7 days have passed since the tag was added. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Temascalapa

Why do you say you say Temascalapa is copyrighted?, I did based on the marking in the description.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TEMASCALAPA.svg

Saludos. --Sarumo74 (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Please send OTRS-permission--Motopark (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Temascalapa II

Sorry for my English, but according to the license I choosed, I am the author and I agree with her. It's like if you told me of the following images the author does not authorize its use, or that the architect does not authorize the use of the image of his work, etc. On the other hand this indicates that the article (paragraph)-not as they say in legal English - the Proclamation (law) of Good Government.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Soderlongvik4.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ossiaalto1945.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Syvahuokon_talo.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Kauppainarissa.jpg Taikanturi?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Laulusepot.jpg Suvisalo?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Karhunkaataja.jpg Taken in a place not public.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Heinolantori4.jpg valiojiji???? and Kuva Assa.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Salonki.jpg Taken in a place not public.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Inkerikuoro1.JPG Taken in a place not public.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Etcetera2.jpg Taken in a place not public.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tasapaino_ehto.jpg Are you the author? or Minä92

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Suorituskykypyramidi.png Are you the author? or Seppo Saari

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Saneeraamaton_Dv12.jpg Are you the author? or Oskari89

Etc.

Saludos. --Sarumo74 (talk) 06:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Temascalapa III

On the one hand there wed page that clearly states:

I, holder of the copyright holder of this work, the public in terms of the following licenses:

etc, etc. then mentioned the license. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 does not cover. and links to them.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.es

Salusos. --Sarumo74 (talk) 06:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mattilahde.JPG

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mattilahde.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cecil (talk) 08:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Heikki_Hasu.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Heikki_Hasu.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cecil (talk) 08:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For tagging the promotional ones :) Regards --Herby talk thyme 12:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Este es el fin de la discusión

Manténgase: that is not a sufficient reason to delete an image that has otherwise been properly licensed to the Commons. However, the images should be deleted if it can be shown that the drawing is a derivative work of a copyrighted photograph. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 19:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

La discusión terminó con eso. Lo que dijo el suuario que puso el anuncio fue un absurdo,por favor no afirmes algo que no es válido ;)

Gracias.

Atte.Neo ender (talk) 20:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Info

Here may be of interest. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello

I uploaded a picture I haven taken myself onto Wikimedia Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tamer_Hassan_crop.jpg). I recieved a message from you asking that I send an email with written permission. I have just done this using my hotmail account right now but I'm still not sure if I have done it correctly as I am new to Wikimedia Commons. Will it be possible if you let me know if I have done it correctly? Sandra Ray (talk) 10:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

You can wait and some OTRS-person check sitiuation and add permission, if nothing happened, you can ask help from COM:ON--Motopark (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Frigidaire Tango

I'm dealing with the images. Most of them could be saved, because they sent a mail via OTRS declaring that they renounce to copyright to their images. -- Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

This logo is a text logo. From this link "it is not possible to copyright a new version of a textile design merely because the colors of red and blue appearing in the design have been replaced by green and yellow, respectively. The same is true of a simple combination of a few standard symbols such as a circle, a star, and a triangle, with minor linear or spatial variations." Please see the microsoft logo, or Best Western logo for more details.

The image is not an obvious case of copyright violation either, and so you should not have used Speedy Delete.SexyKick (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Jorge Cafrune.jpg

Hello Motopark,

This image was scanned from the cover of an album released in Argentina in 1976 (See). Photographs taken over 25 years and published for at least 20 are automatically in the public domain, regardless of who was its author, so I think the tag you added is not correct.

Regards, --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I updated source, now it's OK.--Motopark (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Logo coffe cup.JPG

Esa es una foto que YO tome con MI cámara de un restaurante coffe cup, cual es la violación a los derechos de autor???? Es mi imagen.--Stelita (talk) 17:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please send OTRS-permission--Motopark (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

?

You nominated one of my contributions for speedy with the description : "obvious copyvio"; but I think you failed to see it's a wikipedia screenshot, modified to be used on the french wikipedia help page (update from old interface)... As far as I know wiki releases it's work under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license; and the screenshot is my own work; therefore I do not see any problem here (note that previous similar pictures were on the help page of fr.wiki) - CharlieEchoTango (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

There was a map in the picture, it is copyrighted.--Motopark (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, i removed it. - CharlieEchoTango (talk) 16:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:LogoAguilas.jpg

Hola Motopark. Solo hablo español.

Este archivo consiste sólo en letras, y no alcanza el umbral de originalidad para que sea borrado.--Inefable001 (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Time?

You considered admin rights :) --Herby talk thyme 19:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

No thanks--Motopark (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I was about to ask the same. You're (legitimately) flooding CAT:CV. Delete them yourself!  :) Wknight94 talk 12:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Lancer franc groupe open.jpg

Hello, I don't understand why you removed the image Lancer franc groupe open.jpg. I'm the owner of this picture and I'm ok to put it on Commons. What is the problem ? Could you help me, please ?

Thanks.

--CRJO-CRJO (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Sending OTRS-permission will sove the problem.--Motopark (talk) 19:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Perfect. Many thanks. I've sent the mail just now. Could you please re-insert the file, please ? Cheers. --CRJO-CRJO (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Some admin will do that, I don't have rights, please wait.--Motopark (talk) 10:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

=Category:Album_covers_with_OTRS

Category discussion notification Category:Album_covers_with_OTRS has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Prithviraj 2008.jpg

Hi, why do you think the file source is not properly indicated? The image was taken by a user of the ml-wiki. And please don't template me, a note is enough, I have read Commons:Licensing. Regards Hekerui (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Everyone must check source, because original page has been deleted, you must ask admin to check the soiurce to you. I had same situation in my talk page and I must to contact admin to check original source--Motopark (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
The file already had an original upload log as a separate section, you don't need to add it a second time. Hekerui (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

My personal page

Hi, my personal page will be deleted?--IlSistemone (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much. Good night.--IlSistemone (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for this! — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 20:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

--Apalsola tc 15:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Confused

Hi, I am very confused. What is being deleted? LittleFrog (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Your userpage--Motopark (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I want it back to be fair. I was working on something private .. LittleFrog (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Please ask help from COM:AN--Motopark (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
As I said, it was private and you had no right to remove it. I would appreciate it if you got it back ASAP please. Thank you. LittleFrog (talk) 00:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Dear sir

The file is now in the Wikimedia database; I can log in every five minutes and recreate it if you want to waste your time. But I'm sure you don't want to waste your time. If you want to help Wikimedia then worry about the people of Japan or work on one of your own articles in the Wikipedia mainspace. Regards.

File:ༀམཎིཔདྨེཧཱུྃ།_Tibetan_pilgrim_spinning_a_prayer_wheel_(mani_wheel)_at_the_Tibetan_Buddhist_Monastery,Bir,HP,India.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ༀམཎིཔདྨེཧཱུྃ།_Tibetan_pilgrim_spinning_a_prayer_wheel_(mani_wheel)_at_the_Tibetan_Buddhist_Monastery,Bir,HP,India.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MorganKevinJ(talk) 02:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Thunderbike

Hello Motopark, we are trying to optimize our profile. Refering to "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:PSP#Allowable_user_page.2Fgallery.2Fcategory_content" our page should hit the educationally useful aspect at this very special topic. All outside links are removed. If there is any other suggestion, just let me know about it - else you could remove the quick-delete tag, if anything is fine now. Regards -- Thunderbike Customs Germany 07:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Shatilov_Konstantin

I ask you to temporarily suspend the fast removal. I realized my mistake and quickly corrected. Leaving only the pictures and brief explanations. It is necessary to understand the images and the preparation of papers. I have to work with a different address, as access to the old password I can not restore to recover from the loss of postal address - Shatilov_Konstantin

"Please create User:Shatilov_Konstantin/Sandbox and there you can esit web-page--Motopark (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)" User:Konstantin._K --Konstantin. K (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

About "File:Betty milan.jpg"

The permission was send to portuguese team (permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org) at 30 March 2011, just like it's requested in the page of the image. Samaluca (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

DELETE ASAP

File:Revista Ea.png

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Revista Ea.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Revista Ea.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Motopark (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Regards (Wire and Plastic Products (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC))

DELETE THESE 2 ASAP

File:Paradise Art Space.jpg+File:Revista Ea.jpg Thanks again. (Wire and Plastic Products (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC))

For info

This may be of interest. Regards --Herby talk thyme 08:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info--Motopark (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Acerca del enfoque del material

Buenas tardes, usted escribió en mi página indicando que la información subida no entra dentro del enfoque educativo de Wikimedia Commons. Debo discrepar, dado que la información consiste en un manual instructivo y de capacitación sobre el uso adecuado de las tecnologías y de la importancia del Software Libre para las organizaciones y/o redes de derechos humanos en Centroamérica, está basada en la apropiación de las TIC, de forma segura y con un enfoque de educación popular, este manual instructivo tambien contiene las guías metodológicas para la instalación y uso de las herramientas para la seguridad de la información y comunicación. Además, prefiero que un administrador que hable español revise mi caso.

Gracias de antemano. Cuidatuinfo (talk) 22:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

How work OTRS mail?

Hello. I have the mail of author of the bumper stickers "lew (@) lewrockwell.com", OTRS sends a kind of notification? can you help me with that? For the schoolars photos user:DickClarkMises, from Ludwig von Mises Institute, have the autorized free licences.--Sageo (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, you will have instructions in the picture page.--Motopark (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I already send mails to permission.commons. How i can know if Commons already send them? --Sageo (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
You can ask from COM:ON to somebody check--Motopark (talk) 01:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not delete the image "File:Capa livro primeiro 50 p cento.JPG"

Dear Sir: Good day!

I am the author of the book "Géa" and of the image for the cover of the same book. I received an e-mail from you few minutes ago, where the image "File:Capa livro primeiro 50 p cento.JPG" was said as proposed for rapid deletion.

I explained in the PageTalk of that image that I have sent an e-mail to Wikimedia Commons, authorizing the publication of such image with no restrictions, public domain.

I have also followed the instructions to avoid the delection of that image, instructions which were in the rose rectangle in the image page and erased that rectangle.

Please, contact me via ccdb@ccdb.gea.nom.br or via ccdb1@ig.com.br, or by telephone (Brazil) (-------), to confirm that the image will not be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Although the image is the cover of the book "Géa" of my authorship and I am the owner of all copyrights, I do not see any motive to impede its publication in any media - it's free!

Best regards,

Cláudio César Dias Baptista - CCDB www.ccdb.gea.nom.br ccdb@ccdb.gea.nom.br ccdb1@ig.com.br Brazilian telephone: ------------

Cover pictures need OTRS-permission in Commons --Motopark (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

There is the OTRS permission! Please read the e-mail I just have sent to Wikimedia Commons!

To permissions-commonswikimedia.org

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ File:Capa livro primeiro 50 p cento.JPG ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license [ FAL, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY, GFDL].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[ May 21,2011, Cláudio César Dias Baptista, ccdb@ccdb.gea.nom.br, ccdb1@ig.com.br, www.ccdb.gea.nom.br, Brazilian Telephone number: -------]

NOTE: - I am the ONLY OWNER of the copyright and THE PUBLISHER of the above mentioned image, which is the cover of the book "Géa", of my authorship and the image above is ALSO of my authorship. Iam the person who uploaded the file with the image, I cannot violate my own and exclusive copyright! Please, do not delete the image from Wikimedia Commons



Cláudio César Dias Baptista – CCDB - www.ccdb.gea.nom.br

You must send the permission, please check OTSR-instructions. Thats only way--Motopark (talk) 18:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I have already sent the permission

Dear Sir: thank you for answering.

I have already sent the e-mail with the permission: please read the copy of the e-mail below and see if it is correct:

"wikimedia.org

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ File:Capa livro primeiro 50 p cento.JPG ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license [ FAL, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY, GFDL].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[ May 21,2011, Cláudio César Dias Baptista, ccdb@ccdb.gea.nom.br, ccdb1@ig.com.br, www.ccdb.gea.nom.br, Brazilian Telephone number: -------------]

NOTE: - I am the ONLY OWNER of the copyright and THE PUBLISHER of the above mentioned image, which is the cover of the book "Géa", of my authorship and the image above is ALSO of my authorship. Iam the person who uploaded the file with the image, I cannot violate my own and exclusive copyright! Please, do not delete the image from Wikimedia Commons"

You can ask help from COM:ON--Motopark (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I have already asked help to COM:ON

Dear Motopark: thank you for the instruction for ask help to COM:ON. But I already have gone to COM:ON and asked for help - please enter COM:ON to see my asking for help, which I will not reproduce here to avoid excess of text in your talk page. Is there, please, anything else which I have to do to avoid the deletion of the cover's image of the book "Géa"?Cláudio César Dias Baptista (talk) 19:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Please wait some days, some will answer to you--Motopark (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the answering. I will wait some days. Please read the new topic, below. Cláudio César Dias Baptista (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Here is the AUTHORIZATION in the site where the book "Géa" is published

Dear Motopark: here is the URL where, in the top of the page, you may see a rectangle inside of which there is my authorization for publishing all the images present in the books of my authorship, including covers, if mentioned the source, the same site: http://www.ccdb.gea.nom.br/english_pages.htm

Please, do not erase the image of the cover of the book "Géa" and, please, remove any rectangles where are the allerts for deletion of that image.

I fully understand that the procedures you are taking to avoid unauthorized publications are correct and I thank you very much and also to Wikimedia Commons for these procedures. Cláudio César Dias Baptista (talk) 20:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Edward_westermarck.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edward_westermarck.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:A2 TV.jpg

Hi, please don't nominate for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} applies - Jcb (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File: Clio Faces

I don't know what you showed me, that does not mean that it is subject to any copyright of an image, and does not constitute proof that I have violated. I can only tell you that the company that produced the disc, which is not the one you set as link, failed in 1990, so gone are the twenty years under italian law: that's why the use may be now license free. This does not mean that it is a reconstruction with my pixelart. Please inform next time, before flag a copyright violation. Heftiorus 09:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


Calyle Group

Hi, there.

This picture [4] is made with other pictures on GNU licence witch had been found on the website commons.wikipedia.org . You can take a look there :

[5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Best regards


-Fantomas-DM , 11 September 2011
You must add those pictures as source.--Motopark (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Manuel A. Matos.png

Hi, please don't use {{no license}} if a license is present - Jcb (talk) 11:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

File:LogoLSH.jpg

Hi, once again, please don't nominate for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} clearly applies. Jcb (talk) 10:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Sonotech linkedin.png

Hi, again you nominated a logo for speedy deletion while it's clearly too simple to be eligible for copyright. You must stop that. You seem to be just ignoring my comments at your user talk page. Further inappropriate nominations may lead to further actions. Jcb (talk) 10:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm not ignoring your comments, in some bordercases I see logo different than you, that's why in those cases our opinions differs because we don't have enough clear border in logo's.--Motopark (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
If any doubt is possible, please use a regular DR instead. Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Cute grey kitten.jpg

Thanks for marking the copyvio at File:El jardinero fiel-832678055-large.jpg

Neozoon (talk) 19:37, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Essen - Münster ex 01 ies.jpg

Hallo Motopark, @File:Essen - Münster ex 01 ies.jpg and others: User_talk:Ies#File:Essen_-_Burgplatz_02_ies.jpg. You do not need to tag them currently - you are using the wrong tag. Software bug... Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Stephen_Bishop_(1).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stephen_Bishop_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Missvain (talk) 00:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Patroller rights

Hi Motopark. I've just granted you patroller rights so you can (literally) patrol edits and new pages. Please don't mark new pages for "patrolled" when you've added a {{speedydelete}} template on it. I know that's policy at most other wikis, but here most admins patrol Special:Newpages, so it's better if it stays unpatrolled. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info, I'll try to study first--Motopark (talk) 17:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:ICICI Bank Logo.svg

Hi, you are wasting our time with wrong nominations like this, three administrators were busy with it this time. I think I told you sufficient times not to nominate for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} clearly applies. This case is that obvious that there is no space for a different opinion. Jcb (talk) 19:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for info.--Motopark (talk) 19:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Images on my page

Um...Whyy did you mark the images I uploaded for deletion ??? they are properly attributed!PerfectGentleman (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

You can find those pictures from many web-pages. Try with google-images search an example.--Motopark (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
So What should I do exactly to keep the images? thanks for that link btw, but what should I do with it?

PerfectGentleman (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Send OTRS-permission--Motopark (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the quick reply. Mot too familiar with procedure - do you mean I should send an email to square enix asking them for specific permission? and if so, should I do the same with every image I want to upload? Thanks for the help man(I assume)! PerfectGentleman (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi! is there anyway to have the permission without sending email to OTRS? Cause i'm having problems with microsoft office product key...

No, only way are sned email.--Motopark (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

A suggestion: Several Admins regularly go through new gallery pages

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ANewPages&namespace=0&tagfilter=&username=&hidepatrolled=1

so that a new page is almost always seen by an Admin within a few minutes of creation, and never more than a few hours. Most of them are deleted on sight as out of scope. While your looking at new pages and marking them as {{speedy}} where appropriate is certainly not bad, it duplicates work that Turelio, Herby, I, and a few others are doing anyway. You might like to find a better thing do to with your Commons time.

Or, with your numbers and time on Commons, I think you could easily become an Admin and do New Page Patrol with the delete button ready to go.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Best way to solve this are: When new user will create new callery or page, he / she must create a request and some admin or auto comfirmed user creates this page if it are valid. Can we do a midification to system.--Motopark (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't see any real problem with the current system. We're talking about pages that are created by users who do not have auto-patrol. If almost all of them were good, then it would certainly save Admin time if someone else could approve their creation. But the fact is that 90% are out of scope or other mistakes. Approving a good one takes two clicks. Deleting a bad one takes three clicks, unless I have to write a special reason for deletion, which is rare. So it goes just as fast as an uncontested DR. Having some sort of advance approval would still mean that we would have to delete the bad ones.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I would like to focus on Jim's comment about adminship. I have been working in other areas here and see that you have been marking work needing further attention by an admin, and I am not disagreeing with your point of view. How about you let me nominate you for admin so that you can just deal with the issue as it occurs, and it looks as Jim may concur. Many hands make light work.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
No thanks, I'g like my role in Commons--Motopark (talk) 12:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
To note: So do I, and I am not looking to change your role, I am just wishing to give you access to tools to more efficiently do what you are doing. Note that adminship is not about joining the politics, I haven't. To me it is quietly toiling away in an area of comfort. Mine is mopping. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Hannatalikainen16.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hannatalikainen16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Landatte (talk) 02:34, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:AlefBase album cover.jpg

Hi Motopark, you have tagged the file that I uploaded with "speedy deletion" tag. Please, check it now if its ok. And if not, what exactly to do? KremBrule commons (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

In source will be read © 2001-2011 GEVOLT. All Rights Reserved. You must send OTRS.--Motopark (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

help

how to upload a good photo please enlightenment .. thank you ZQheert (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

To take a own photo and upload it with EXIF-data and biggest resolution.--Motopark (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
what if the pictures are already uploaded and then problems such as image maps that i uploaded? please if you can help me to fix the file, thanks ZQheert (talk) 00:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
You must ask OTRS-permission from map's owner and send it. You will get more help to ask in COM:VP.--Motopark (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

[10] Is where I got Ponies mushroom.jpg --Loveboy01 (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for your work. What about the other uploads by User:Gustavoadolfopg? Regards, --Polarlys (talk) 22:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure about other uploads, they are small nice pictures, I will follow what happens.--Motopark (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Raumankanava2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Raumankanava2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.224.66.113 10:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Presunta violazione di copyright inesistente.

Gentilissimo "Motopark", ho letto il suo avviso di violazione di copyright nell'immagine: "File:Camicia grezza MDT.jpg". Non è assolutamente vero, in quanto sono proprio io l'autore dell'immagine e l'ideatore della camicia fatta successivamente realizzare da G&C. Le iniziali sul colletto rappresentano il mio nome e il mio cognome. La invito a fornirmi al più presto le sue motivazioni nel caso di una rimozione dal sito. --Marco Del Torchio 95 (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Licensing

I'm curious about image licensing, which I think I did not entirely understood. I've uploaded several images which now have a warning saying that they could be deleted. I just copied the license from other similar images, so I understand that some of them may be wrong. I think that there may be some kind of trouble with photos (I uploaded some), but there shouldn't be with posters, like the ones used in electoral propaganda, should be? I did read the proper articles regarding licensing and the such, but I still don't fully understand the use of it on the wikipedia. Impru20 (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't anyt information from source about licensing, please put in the pictures page link to licence in sourcepage if it's available--Motopark (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Since I can't find a better license for them right now, please delete them. I'll use modified versions of the previous images for the election articles, though it's a pity I can't find a proper license for electoral posters (mostly because electoral posters and propaganda are meant to be freely distributed once released to the public). I hope we'll be able to use them someday, though. Impru20 (talk) 11:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
They will deleted after 7 days--Motopark (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

A quick question: I saw some interesting images in Flickr that could replace the images that I initially uploaded and that ended up removed. Since I saw several images uploaded whose license gives the understanding that these are allowed because they are from there, my question is: Are images from Flickr allowed to be uploaded? Thank you. Impru20 (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

You can use flicker tool--Motopark (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

cover (plush ape)

Hallo Motopark, just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your tagging and added info. Do you agree? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

+here too. Those files (especially the latter) may be out of scope - but I fail to see that this is a clear copyvio. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Let's keep them as own work--Motopark (talk) 00:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay, fine. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm Not Violating Anyones Copyrights With "MY" Images

Please remove the tag accusing me of copyright violations. First off the site you referenced doesn't own the image nor does its parent company. Here is a copy of the information I added to the file description:

The Venom picture was originally created and copy-written for Marvel Comics. There is a public license agreement stating that as long as the image is "NOT" being used for business advertising to get or potentially get monetary gain it can be recreated for personal non-profit use. The link going to a "copy" of the original picture is on a site called MyComicNetwork.com which is owned by a company named SoEntertain.Me (Copyright MyComicNetwork.com - Daily Comic News. Copyright SoEntertain.Me. All Rights Reserved.)

The Owner and CEO of SoEntertain.Me is Paul Keller. He can be contacted by e-mailing him to this address;

p.keller@soentertain.me

He will verify they do not own or hold copyrights to my image or the original created for Marvel Comics. Please always remember when a version of an image is hosted somewhere that doesn't mean the site or its parent company owns it.

Zeddicus Zorander 88


So again I ask you to remove the tags you placed on my images in error.

"Zeddicus Zorander 88"

Deletion of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Femdom_golden_shower should be rescinded

The file [[11]] uses photo [[12]] That photo is licensed as free license by http://bossy-girls.net/Free-License.html The photo show the URL of that website. Therefore this photo is licensed as free for the purpose deginated at the wiki pages. Therefore neither the file nor its photo should be deleted. They should be included in the Category:femdom


Your copyvio tag on File:Ndidi O - Tamanoir - 9 décembre 2011.JPG

Hello Motopark, thanks for checking our uploads for copyvios. The image seems to be from: http://hetf.blogspot.com/2011/12/ndidi-o-tamanoir-9-decembre-2011.html

All the content on that page is marked as: Pour entrer en contact avec nous, vous pouvez utiliser les formulaires de commentaire des articles. Sauf mention contraire, le contenu de ce blog est sous contrat Creative Commons.

So I will remove the tag and change the license and put a link to that page.

Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help.--Motopark (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi.tif

Thanks for your prompt response.This photo is a portion of a group photo.Please allow it to stay.Highly obliged. Soni Ruchi (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi.tif

This is to inform you that Wikipedia Commons has my express permission to retain and make public this file containing the photograph of Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi, created by Soni Ruchi.I am giving this permission as the eldest son of Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi.As such there is no violation of The Indian Copyright Act,1957. Ravinder Kumar Soni (talk) 09:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Soni Family Jaipur 1930.jpg

This photo is more than 80 years old and has remained with the family since long.It is a rare photo which the family gave to me to be used on Wikimedia Commons. According to the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, the duration of copyright is sixty years, therefore, there is no copyright issue involved.Kindly look into this aspect as well. Thanks and highly obliged. Soni Ruchi (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Soni Family Jaipur 1930.jpg

This is to inform you that Wikipedia Commons has my express permission to retain and make public this file containing the eighty years old Soni Family Jaipur 1930 photograph, created by Soni Ruchi.I am giving this permission as the eldest son of Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi.As such there is no violation of The Indian Copyright Act,1957. Ravinder Kumar Soni (talk) 09:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

if you check from pictures history, I haven't added any information to this picture. Please ask help from COM:KH--Motopark (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


File tagging File:Eric Reed.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eric Reed.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eric Reed.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sreejith K (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Not my picture, right person are Shimunov Rafael, please contact him.--Motopark (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Patroller

As a patroller, please mark pages as patrolled even if you tag them with speedy delete. e.g. Kimba candombe--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Good to know this, thanks.--Motopark (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)