User talk:Jmh649/2

File:Amyloid fibril formation and classic facial features of AL amyloidosis.jpg[edit]

File:Amyloid fibril formation and classic facial features of AL amyloidosis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Early Dengue Fever Rash 2014.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Early Dengue Fever Rash 2014.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jespinos (talk) 23:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metformin 500mg Tablets.jpg[edit]

File:Metformin 500mg Tablets.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 12:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AneurysmAorta.jpg[edit]

I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to File:AneurysmAorta.jpg. If you would like a cropped version, please either use the CropTool or crop the file yourself and upload the file to a new file on Commons. Please see Commons:CROP for more information. Thanks, $The Haz talk$ 04:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was a very minor edit and removed unneeded material. James Heilman, MD (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Down_risk_by_maternal_age.png[edit]

Hi,

This is my first substantive interaction with Wikipedia, so I apologize if I'm contacting you in the wrong place or breaking some sort of protocol.

You uploaded this plot of Down syndrome risk by maternal age, with a citation to this paper. The plot you produced shows a surprising hump in risk around age 45 while the paper mentions that the age pattern is sigmoidal (and therefore shouldn't have any humps). In fact, I plugged the formula from the paper into Wolfram Alpha and got this plot of the risk function, which subjectively looks a lot more reasonable. Is it possible your plot is wrong?

All the best.

-Jon Jonazose (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take a looked at the observed odds in table 2. This is simply a graph of that data. James Heilman, MD (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Figure 1[edit]

hi, have your checked out the Figure 1 medical imagery sharing site? https://figure1.com/sections/blog/ sounds promising for a mass upload, but don't know about the licensing. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 01:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slowking4 It states here that it is under a closed license [1] I have asked if they are interested in collaborating. James Heilman, MD (talk) 23:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, i later noticed that "all rights reserved" thing. dunno what their profit expectations are. maybe they would be interested in freemium. (seeding low res versions). Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 23:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have emailed them to ask. James Heilman, MD (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are not interested unfortunately. James Heilman, MD (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:James 5 (Final 4)aCrop.png[edit]

File:James 5 (Final 4)aCrop.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Anatoliy (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pick of me by me taken with a tripod. James Heilman, MD (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg[edit]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Graham87 (talk) 08:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes unable to verify either. James Heilman, MD (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg[edit]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue follow-up[edit]

Toilet pictures deletion

Uploader here [2]
Deleting admin User:JuTa
OTRS ticket [Ticket#: 2015080310012117]

Further discussion [3]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:An example of plagarism of a work from Wikipedia.jpg[edit]

Hi, Doc James, this image seems to be a copy from yours, uploaded February 10, 2010 by yourselves. It cites as source: "Nishith Patel". Any idea what this could mean? I'd like to insert the image on the Plagiarism article, hence my question. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is an image of mine, that someone by the name called "Nishith Patel" claimed as their. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Do you think it would be a good example to add to the Plagiarism article, just to show how far plagiarism can reach? Lotje (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup would be happy with that. We do not own the text however just the picture. Maybe we should crop / blur it? What do you think User:Lotje Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. Since the image is yours anyway, you coud easily upload a new version with a blurred text.

Lotje (talk) 13:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:At008g22.jpg[edit]

Hi, Please use the gadget to create DR. See in your preferences. Yours was not properly done. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which gadget is that? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah found it. Great tool. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:RABORAL V-RG® baits.jpg[edit]

File:RABORAL V-RG® baits.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 11:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smooth O I just cropped the picture. I was not the one who uploaded it. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template is automatically added to all file contributors. --Smooth_O (talk) 12:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sounds good. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:James 5 (Final 4)a.png[edit]

Hi. Is this some kind of selfie? --Base (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes a stand and a timer. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

use of an image in an anatomy textbook[edit]

Hello,

Could you please contact me at info@wanderlustphotos.com about the possibility of using this image (see link below) in an anatomy textbook? I know it's in creative commons as being able to be used commercially, but the publisher won't automatically accept the CC-BY-SA license and prefers to get formal permission.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AcetabularfracX.png

Thanks,

Kristin

Sure you may use it User:Wanderlustphotos. Please attribute "James Heilman, MD, Wikipedia" Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SubconjunctivalBleed.JPG[edit]

I categorized your file File:SubconjunctivalBleed.JPG and File:Syndactyly2014.JPG. It is not correct to categorize in a generic Category:Medicine. --Jmarchn (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good User:Jmarchn thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arachnoid cyst.png[edit]

I recategorized your upload file. Please, try to categorize your uploads to more adjusted category.--Jmarchn (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And the Petechia images.--Jmarchn (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Not much experience with the category system. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your change of Jext300-Autoinjektor-02.jpg[edit]

It is a common rule to use "Derivate" or "Extraxt", if you wish to alter a file. And it would be a sign of politeness and good education, to respect the explicit wish of the author, not too touch the original file. Furthermore, as I am an active photographer and hold the RAW material of the file, it is only a small effort to ask me, if I can produce a second view of the photo upon your wishes. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS: There is a smaller file already available under File:Jext300-Autoinjektor-03.jpg --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure happy to upload a new file after cropping off the white space. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The goal was to get it to format the same as the others.[4] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. If you need special formats or crops from other files, you always can message me and I am glad to help. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect thanks User:Cccefalon :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The man[edit]

The man with Jaundice looks like my late father. Why is he here? Did he give permission to use this after his death?

If you email me his name I can send you the consent. But yes the gentleman with jaundice gave consent for the use of his image on Wikipedia. He wanted to help other people who had a similar condition to him. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilliamsSyndrome.jpg[edit]

Hi Doc, I try to be careful with the copyright status of images that I upload. I would like to review the status of the image, but just 48 hours after tagging it has been deleted. I just saw the notification now. Could you provide me with more information? Thank you Wormcast (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no worries User:Wormcast. The journal that it was from was marked as NC thus I nominated it for deletion. They are amazingly fast here on commons. I guess the one thing we did not check was to see if the journal was originally labeled as CC BY SA and than latter changed to CC BY SA NC. Unfortunately I am not an admin here so cannot pull further details easily. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, either way it had to go. A pity, that was a difficult image to find... Thanks for the follow-up -Wormcast (talk) 01:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wormcast I was able to find others under an open license and I have uploaded them[5]

This search engine allows you to search for medical images under a CC BY license[6] It however does occasionally get it wrong so double checking is still required. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consent[edit]

How, Doc, do you give reviewers access to the consent documentation associated with each patient image you upload? That is, beyond the "just trust me" statement that appears on your User page, how is this formally a traceable process that would stand up to a (using American parlance) HIPAA-type audit?

This questioning is part of the broader process through which I am trying to understanding how this image uploading business can possibly can be a sustainable process, workable not just for the reliable physicians involved like yourself, but also for any that might wish to participate, but also excluding any that would seek to misuse or defraud the system.

Apart from demanding from each that submits a validated form of credentials establishing their ability to diagnose and assign the argued pathology, and keeping these on file, alongside permissions and patient consent materials likewise in order, and making these open for review—I cannot see how this is not going to explode at some point. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So when a fellow Wikipedian launched legal attacks against me my college of physicians and surgeons reviewed my consent forms for the images I upload to Wikipedia. This was written about in part in the NYTs[7]. They were happy with what I was doing and I won the case.

My consent forms have the patients name, address, and other details. I keep a copy and put a copy in the persons chart. I am not willing to share these details with anyone other than my college / the patient in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had no doubt/question that you would have available to you, and would avail yourself of the proper forms for your medicolegal context, or—knowing your integrity from your work and interactions here—or that you would apply these in a proper and disciplined way. That is, I, personally feel I have every reason to trust you.

This is a separate, but related matter from whether we should allow pictures at all. (You know I disagree with you on this, unless and until we create a separate category of contributors, who have verified, formal credentials. I believe that such formal credentials are absolutely essential, in the WP:OR that goes on in your evaluating your images, evaluating and keeping the images of others, etc. For that matter, same with me working on chemistry and biochemistry images. This recognition, however, is against the spirit of the place—to formally recognise expertise—and so it is safe to say I will remain in disagreement that we ought allow self-published medical images from editors.)

As I said, I have reason to choose to trust you (because your credentials are present, I have superficially checked them, and because your performance here is consistent with your presenting credentials). But just as the issue of your editing, with, hypothetically (I know you do not do this), an occasional edit left without a source, where I would not worry about the edit, so it is with your images. I trust the intellectual content, because I trust you as a physician and editing WikiProj Med contributor. So the same is true with your addition of images. If you say image X presents condition/symptom X, I am going to believe it.

I do not however extend this trust very far beyond you, in medical edits, unless I see similar reason to trust. This is true in terms of textual content and images, from you, and it is also true with regard to the matter of patient consent.

Returning to that matter. What I am trying to understand/sort: How can what is being done by the best (you, regarding your consent practices), that ought to be done by all, be institutionalised into policy, at WP, where our contributors are not restricted to experts, and where we draw editors from many tens of English-speaking nations, each with their own HIPAA-type legal requirements? How do we hope to allow medical images representing patients, not sifted through automatically by any consent and release process (as would take place if we import images from a published textbook, or other formal source)? What policies guide this now, at WP, and are they sufficient—would our policies have directed you to do what you did, with your consent forms and process, so that it directs others to do the same?

Cheers, let's continue this here, until such time as we move it to a better venue. Le Prof 73.210.155.96 14:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: James, to the extent that the consent forms contain protected information such as patients' real names, they're likely subject to medical confidentiality laws. I hope that you would seek competent legal advice before disclosing the contents of any consent form, especially to Wikimedians (who are highly unlikely to have secure storage facilities for protected information). WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:CCSR2011.jpg[edit]

File:CCSR2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FormAllTheHides (talk) 03:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You could have just used "Upload a new version of this file" User talk:FormAllTheHides. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD accuracy check request[edit]

HEARTBLEND

Hi James, I hope you are well. After a recent small debacle with a MOTD animation which was factually inaccurate (File:Paso_a_paso_de_un_nudo_As_de_guía.ogv), the same group has had another animation promoted, this time medical. While the animations are perhaps beautiful, I'm a little worried now about their educational merit... would you by any chance have a couple minutes to look at File:HEARTBLEND.ogv and just verify that there are at least no glaring inaccuracies? Thanks for your time, Storkk (talk) 10:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Storkk for the ping. The animation is not very good. The whole heart does not "enlarge" (as show by zooming in) and "shrink" (as shown by zooming out) at the same time.

This animation is way better in its accuracy[8]

Other issues: 1) what happened to the inferior vena cava? Why no blue arrow coming out the right main pulomary trunk, why no read arrow coming out of the aorta? Now arrow going in the other two pulmonary veins

Basically it is not accurate enough for us on English WP and we also have images currently showing similar things that are more accurate. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that given it wasn't fantastically wrong, I'll just let my admonishment at User talk:Lorgut stand. MOTD is such an backwater on Commons that there doesn't seem too much point to following it up further. Thanks again for your time, Storkk (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would be good to put in place mechanisms for topic area experts to weigh in on these things before promotions occur. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but as far as I can tell, there is no formal process at all for a file to become MOTD. Very little review goes into it, let alone review by topic area experts. It's very different to POTD, where at least they have been vetted by going through COM:FPC. Storkk (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If there is not enough good media for a "media of the day" maybe it should be changed to "media of the week". We only have Featured Lists on the main page on EN WP once to twice a week rather than daily. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be even better to subsume it into POTD or even do away with it altogether. I don't think it is particularly useful in its current form. I think making it "Media of the week" solves only the secondary problem of having relatively few nominations; from what I can tell the larger problem is that while lots of people like having a featured media item (thus giving rise to inertia against changing the status quo), nobody (modulo one or two) really cares enough to actively nominate, promote and curate it. I may be misjudging the inertia, though... I'll think about creating a proposal to do away with MOTD. Storkk (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Softron Logo.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ 00:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeff G. thanks and have commented. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:A woman diagnosed as suffering from hilarious mania. Colour Wellcome L0026687.jpg[edit]

File:A woman diagnosed as suffering from hilarious mania. Colour Wellcome L0026687.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

CARNATION (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wht u deleted page[edit]

	wht u deleted page
	wht u deleted page ThakurSaabji (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure to what you refer User:ThakurSaabji? Do you own the copyright to this[9] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:SkinInEosinCell.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SkinInEosinCell.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Smooth O (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smooth O please look at the source in question which says "This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited." Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the WMF warring over Flow?[edit]

As you probably know, Commons reached consensus to uninstall Flow.[10] A volunteer developer had already written the patch to complete the Phabricator task, however the WMF halted deployment with no explanation. The WMF has just posted a response refusing to uninstall.[11] Again with no explanation.

I do not understand why the WMF is fighting consensus here, and more importantly I think the only result will be to pointlessly worsen the WMF-community relationship.

While my first preference is of course for the consensus task to be completed, as a Board member I was hoping you would at a minimum take an interest in investigating WHY the WMF feels it is worth fighting the community over this. As I said, the WMF has given no explanation whatsoever. Alsee (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The WMF is responding by building a superprotect for Flow.[12] Alsee (talk) 06:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay will look. Thanks for the heads up. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James I'd like to make a correction. I said no explanation was offered. However the commons post was so upsetting that I missed the asserted rationale. They're citing the log entries for deleted pages. This was not a problem on EnWiki, it was not a problem on Meta, and no one cares about log entries for non-existent Flow pages. And people care even less about logs for Flow-test pages, which is all Commons ever had. Alsee (talk) 08:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alsee Okay so my understanding is that currently Commons does not allow Flow pages. And that currently their are no Flow pages on Commons. While the software may be lingering in the background, if it is unused is that not sufficient? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard there are two Flow pages on Commons. At the moment I can only point to one: Commons_talk:Flow.

Regarding leaving Flow in the background, this is the third time it's being redebated. Here's the meta-discussion:

On EnWiki, the WMF proposed leaving Flow installed in the background. The involved editors and WMF discussed it and came to agreement that would not be sufficient. There was WMF-editor agreement that consensus was sufficiently obvious without need of a formal RFC. Flow was amicably uninstalled.
On Meta: The RFC proposal was "Proposal to remove Flow on Meta-Wiki". I foresaw that the WMF might interpret it as leaving Flow in the background. I opened an RFC subsection Clarification_of_purpose. Among those who supported the RFC, they explicitly and unanimously ruled out leaving Flow in the background. Two of the RFC opponents also commented in that section. One merely reiterated opposition to the RFC as a whole, however the other opponent notably affirmed the RFC intent was explicitly for uninstall and not leaving Flow in the background. I would like to note that the section got hatted, and I'd like to offer an opinion on why. I think people considered it blindingly-obvious that the intent was explicit uninstall. I think some people considered it unnecessary/offensive/bad_faith to question whether leaving Flow in the background would be acceptable. It turns out I was right to open the section. When the Phab task was filed, the WMF did initially interpret it as leaving Flow in the background. I cited the explicit consensus that against that option. That initial misunderstanding was quickly and amicably cleared up. Flow was uninstalled.
On Commons: The proposal was absolutely explicit on uninstall. Many supports were brief, but some support rationales explicitly preclude any interpretation of leaving Flow in the background. The WMF ignored the public discussion, the WMF had their own non-public discussion, the WMF refused repeated requests to shine light on the nature of those internal discussions, then the WMF spent five days building a super protection mode for Flow in secret.[13][14] The WMF plans-or-planned to roll out the undiscussed new Flow feature. When that was announced, a number of people from the RFC began explicitly objecting that it was not an acceptable alternative. I, and I'm sure others, consider it perverse and offensive for the WMF to assert that we were requesting development of a yet another Flow feature.

Given that Flow isn't wanted on Commons, given that the WMF agrees that Flow isn't going to be here in any functional form, is there any credible reason for the WMF to damage relations over this? The WMF is citing Flow logs as a technical-reason not to uninstall. However that rationale makes no sense, and the WMF's insistence on covert discussions compounds questions about the sincerity of that rationale. Instead of wasting time and money developing a Flow-lockdown mode, the WMF could have addressed the log issue instead. That is clearly the correct technical answer, that would clean up any log concern for EnWiki and Meta. I see no good-faith way the WMF can claim the log issue is severe enough to prevent a Commons uninstall while simultaneously prohibiting the logs from being cleaned up for EnWiki and Meta. Alsee (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am with you in not liking flow. IMO we do not need three different way to edit Wikipedia when two is enough. And unfortunately flow has distracted from the development of wanted changes to talk pages. Though developing stuff for communities other than EN WP is something I support.

With respect to "delete and disable" versus "uninstall" both results in the same outward result and thus I am not seeing this as a critical issue. Any return of this software IMO would need a clear super majority. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"flow has distracted from the development of wanted changes to talk pages" - that is passive phrasing. The WMF has been actively rejecting work on Talk pages. Every single time, the WMF politely states they won't do squat for us unless we switch to Flow first. As long as key management are married to the idea that Flow is going to eventually replace all talk pages, they don't want to engage in wasted/counterproductive work improving a system they want to eliminate. It's a slow form of sabotage-by-neglect. By the way, that is one of the reasons people want Flow uninstalled rather than hidden. Maybe we can finally get things like section watchlisting if the WMF accepts that Flow isn't on a slow-roll to replace Talk pages. Alsee (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the last bit you raise is by far more important than the uninstall / disable discussion IMO. If dreams of "flow" are being used to prevent development of the primary talk page system than we need to be discussing that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use image[edit]

Hi James,
Are you willing to share the following images under the CC-BY 4.0 license (without the share-alike necessity), so I can use them on Radlines?
Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mikael Häggström I see a few of my images here already.[15]

Appears they allow CC BY SA Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It did initially allow that, but now all images there should be no more restrictive than CC-BY, so I still need to ask. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I generally like the "SA" part of the license. But sure if you need it for these 4 images I am willing to wave it on these User:Mikael Häggström. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, and Merry Christmas!

Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RettScoliosis.png[edit]

I asked (using template) to clarify to image status as at the source link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2164934/figure/F1/ it is now "For legal reasons, the publisher has withdrawn permission for online, public display of this article". Sorry if some misunderstanding from my side. --NeoLexx (talk) 21:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still published under an open license.

We are not deleting for copyright reasons so moved to here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:24, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Amyloidosis1.webm[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yah the crop video tool is still in development. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic that you uploaded concerning # of COVID-19 specimens tested is out of date by over a week.[edit]

On the page for 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_the_United_States#Additional_information_on_cases), you added a graph on the "Additional information on cases" section concerning the number of specimens tested. The graphic needs updating, but I don't seem to have permissions.

The source material from the CDC is on the page below:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/testing-in-us.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Ftesting-in-us.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oltemative (talk • contribs) 22:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oltemative new version above. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Outbreak-coronavirus-world-large.png[edit]

File:Outbreak-coronavirus-world-large.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	You deserve a gold one 🥇 Vera ^(talk) 17:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions[edit]

File tagging File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

pandakekok9 08:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am against deletion by the way. pandakekok9 08:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

pandakekok9 08:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct InfluenzaCaseMortality.svg[edit]

The graph is off by an order of magnitude in all categories. You need to use Table 1 from the reference. Table 2 has differing definitions of population at risk, shown by the different ratios calculated between tables 1 and 2. —— 2600:1700:4881:CD0:803:22BE:90A2:8826 16:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source is here[16]

What is taking the deaths and dividing it by symptomatic illness? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:39, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mortality is 0.8% in the over 65 group... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reread and recalculated. You were correct. I apologize for the error. The table 2 mortality was overall mortality with and without symptoms for COVID. I misunderstood the publication. Surprisingly high mortality! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kd4ttc (talk • contribs) 03:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Less than 1% in those over 65 is not that high. Expecially when you look at the mortality in COVID19 in that age group. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong graph (wrong numbers and wrong massage)[edit]

Dear James,

in the german and english article “Influenza“ is a graph made by you suggesting the mortality of influenza in the US for the season 2018/2019.

Something went totally wrong with that (or was sabotaged by somebody). The numbers in your graph are all skipped by two digits. In the original source the summ is 100%, not 1%, and the numbers express only the related burden (relative Verteilung) in-between the different age classes, not the absolut number of deaths in percent in a specific age category related to all infected people in the US.

I hope you understand the difference and change that asap.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2018-2019.html

PS, as I see right now, there are also estimates for the total mortality rate of x in 100.000 with a UI95% on the same webpage. But that are completely other numbers than those you (or somebody else) used.

Please check that cause it is a serious mistake.

Best regards,

Andreas Walter. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:908:C60:4460:51F1:CD63:11C5:83F8 (talk) 02:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the issue is. This is a graph of deaths divided by symptomatic illness. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry, my fault. Your numbers are OK. I made the math by myself. I think it has to do with the look, the design of the graph. Would be good to have the percentage over or under every age group since there is no grid. It's also unusual to use 0,25% steps, in my opinion, but people in the US even think in miles and gallons and use a point (dot) where europeans use a comma. The (german?) guy did not adapt the graph in the german article to european standards.

0,007% / 0,003% / 0,021% / 0,062% / 0,831% (since the grid is to corse for the first 4 columns) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:908:C60:4460:E569:9C15:355D:4151 (talk) 04:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree good points. Will try to create a new version. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A small potential improvement[edit]

Hi Doc. I hope you're well. Just saw these because I have your talk on my watchlist. I might suggest something that I think would be an improvement on the second chart: the in-graphic title states just "Fatality Rate", which a layman would almost certainly assume means infection fatality rate. It certainly has a filename and description stating that it is case fatality rate, but I think the in-graphic title has the potential to mislead someone who doesn't know the difference and is trying to figure out what the chances of dying are, given one is infected. AFAIK we don't have good estimates of IFR yet (and I know the graph isn't purporting to show IFR). I know you didn't create this chart, but do you think it would be worthwhile inserting "Case" in the title? I can perform the edit if you think it would be valuable, but I'll rely on your judgment. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 07:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Storkk yes an excellent idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay have adjusted both... Not sure if this addresses the issues. Not able to figure out how to replace "." with ","Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great... Not sure what "." and "," you are referring to. If being picky, I'd replace "8" with "8.0". Storkk (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider the deletion request[edit]

Dear Doc James, you have labeled the picture for deletion referring to possible copyright violation. I would like to let you know that I have taken the picture from the source article where it was published and the whole content of the article including the pictures were labeled under CCA-NC 4.0 license which allowed me to download and share the picture while crediting the authors. You can find it online at: https://www.emjreviews.com/urology/article/efficacy-of-the-artificial-urinary-sphincter-zsi-375-for-treatment-of-post-radical-prostatectomy-incontinence-in-patients-with-intrinsic-sphincter-deficiency-a-preliminary-study/

“Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.”

HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We do not allow none open source licenses. NC is not open source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Noted. Reviewed the policy on freely licensed images. Thank you for the clarification! HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 21:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to Use Images[edit]

Dear Dr. James Heilman, MD,

My name is Kyle and I am creating a website to help medical students learn how to read and interpret x-ray images. I came across several of your x-ray images on Wikimedia Commons and would absolutely love to use them on my membership-based website. Will you allow me to use them and how would you like to be attributed on my site? Also, is there any way to remove arrows or crop images? If so, how would I properly attribute the changes to the image? I am interested in using approximately 30 of your x-ray images. I can shoot you an email if you would like a list of the images I would like to use.

Thank you so much for your consideration and your work. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Kylebarner1 (talk) 20:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are all avaliable under an open license. Simple attribute myself and Wikipedia. I have often uploaded versions with and without an arrow. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Great thanks for your help :-) Sylwia Ufnalska (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sylwia Ufnalska Welcome back. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Hello,

Do you know where I might find freely licensed photos from psych wards? I looked on Commons, but found only a small handful of historical photos.

Thanks for all the work that you do!

Benjamin (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[17] Benjamin Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Are there others? I was specifically hoping for current day photos. Benjamin (talk) 11:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208485/ Benjamin Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tumi[edit]

Hi there I'll momently return TumiMajess (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Narrator[edit]

Hi don't have money TumiMajess (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:MorphineRx.JPG[edit]

File:MorphineRx.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:908:F22:AE40:E0F7:DB7A:1AF6:88E2 09:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:The Old Guitarist (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 03:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:TranscaucasianTrail.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:TranscaucasianTrail.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:TranscaucasianTrail.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evaluation of the GeneXpert for Human Monkeypox Diagnosis.pdf[edit]

File:Evaluation of the GeneXpert for Human Monkeypox Diagnosis.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

StarryGrandma (talk) 14:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undid this and added the PMD link that shows the CC BY 4.0 statement, StarryGrandma (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ColinBlock.jpg[edit]

File:ColinBlock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ColinCreatingAccount.jpg[edit]

File:ColinCreatingAccount.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

186.172.33.119 21:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jmh649/2

File:Amyloid fibril formation and classic facial features of AL amyloidosis.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Early Dengue Fever Rash 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Metformin 500mg Tablets.jpg[edit]

File:AneurysmAorta.jpg[edit]

File:Down_risk_by_maternal_age.png[edit]

Figure 1[edit]

File:James 5 (Final 4)aCrop.png[edit]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg[edit]

File:Variolation vial India.jpg[edit]

Copyright issue follow-up[edit]

File:An example of plagarism of a work from Wikipedia.jpg[edit]

File:At008g22.jpg[edit]

File:RABORAL V-RG® baits.jpg[edit]

File:James 5 (Final 4)a.png[edit]

use of an image in an anatomy textbook[edit]

File:SubconjunctivalBleed.JPG[edit]

Arachnoid cyst.png[edit]

Your change of Jext300-Autoinjektor-02.jpg[edit]

The man[edit]

File:WilliamsSyndrome.jpg[edit]

Consent[edit]

File:CCSR2011.jpg[edit]

MOTD accuracy check request[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:A woman diagnosed as suffering from hilarious mania. Colour Wellcome L0026687.jpg[edit]

wht u deleted page[edit]

File tagging File:SkinInEosinCell.jpg[edit]

Why is the WMF warring over Flow?[edit]

Permission to use image[edit]

File:RettScoliosis.png[edit]

Important message for file movers[edit]

Image without license[edit]

File:Amyloidosis1.webm[edit]

Graphic that you uploaded concerning # of COVID-19 specimens tested is out of date by over a week.[edit]

File:Outbreak-coronavirus-world-large.png[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Deletions[edit]

File tagging File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

File tagging File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-curves-graphic2-stopthespread-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

File:Covid-19-Handshake-Alternatives-v3.gif[edit]

Please correct InfluenzaCaseMortality.svg[edit]

Wrong graph (wrong numbers and wrong massage)[edit]

A small potential improvement[edit]

Please reconsider the deletion request[edit]

Permission to Use Images[edit]

Thanks[edit]

Photos[edit]

Tumi[edit]

Narrator[edit]

File:MorphineRx.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Copyright status: File:TranscaucasianTrail.jpg[edit]

File:Evaluation of the GeneXpert for Human Monkeypox Diagnosis.pdf[edit]

File:ColinBlock.jpg[edit]

File:ColinCreatingAccount.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search