User talk:Alex Tora
Alex K Ostorzhskyi.svg
[edit]Привіт! Прошу власноруч замінити колір гербового поля на червоний. Може тоді зникне це жахливе непорозуміння. --Bulka UA (talk) 16:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Cossack_Hetmanat.png
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Cossack_Hetmanat.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Alex K Herb UNR.svg
[edit]Hey, I fixed this image up for you, hope you don't mind. MediaWiki hates big SVGs. :-) Feel free to contact me, but if you need me to reply urgently, use my enwiki talk, I don't show up here often. --Akhristov 09:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex K Peremyshel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Can you add the name of the other file - thanks. --Deadstar 07:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 05:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
- Corrected--Alex Tora 05:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 05:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
- Corrected--Alex Tora 05:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Гербы
[edit]Предлагаю временно приостановить активность в спорных вопросах и обсудить проблему в User talk:EugeneZelenko#Image:Kiew-oblast-COA.PNG (или можно найти лучшее место). --EugeneZelenko 14:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Пожалуйста, придерживайтесь соглашения о наименованиях изображений флагов. Так будет легче найти нужное изображение другим участникам. --EugeneZelenko 16:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Дякую за пораду, але я сам обираю назви своїхзображень. ПКористувачам полегшує пошук зображень не іх іменування, а категоризація.--Alex Tora 17:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Alex, while I appreciate these images are very similar, we generally try to use the common names of flags. Thus we have Image:Flag of Australia.svg, Image:Flag of Japan.svg, etc, instead of having the image uploader's name in the image. Please do not edit war. Thanks, ~ Riana ⁂ 10:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. As far as I see the Flags' naming convention has no any mark of "convention" and was not adopted by all users. If I have no right to name my images in the way I like to , I would stop uploading my flags to this "commons". Thats would the best resolving of the problem. Bless you.--Alex Tora 11:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Alex, I saw the mini edit war over the name, but it seems that the only control we retain when donating images under free licenses is the ability to have the work credited to us. Your works are obviously appreciated so I hope you keep them coming. I hope the renamed version properly credits you, if you want to retain the image in your personal upload gallery the easiest thing is to re-upload it over top of the existing file. Best wishes for the coming new year. :-) --Tony Wills 22:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not use your IP, 202.249.210.121 (talk · contribs), to try and get around this. It's been blocked for 24 hours. — Giggy 22:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Giggy, Under what reasons did you block my IP? I do usefull work by uploading rare images. I name them as I like to. Thats my rigth as an author. Be so kind to reblok my IP and let me be as I want with my images. --Alex Tora 22:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- As far as I know, you are unable to upload images using an IP. You can upload images with this account if you wish. However, I must echo what Riana and Tony have said above. Please do not attempt to name images with your personal naming preferences. You are welcome to add them to a subpage, and to add your name to the image description page for accreditation - indeed, we encourage you to. I will not unblock your IP (it expires after 24 hours regardless) as you have clearly been using it to try and get around the community consensus, and convention, that has been explained to you. — Giggy 23:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please show me official regulations of commons and meta that prohibits me to use my personal naming in my images. --Alex Tora 23:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's a naming convention at Commons:WikiProject_Flags#Naming_convention. There are no hard rules, we tend to avoid those, but I would like to think that users would act within the realms of established consensus. Check out the naming on all these flags, for instance. — Giggy 23:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you have no strick rules here, what all this talk about. If I want to use my personal naming in my images, I can. Thats my right. Freedom of editing (including freedom of naming) is the rule in wiki and meta. Please elaborete prohibition rules and then claim such nonsence like do not attempt to name images with your personal naming preferences. Naming_convention is not the rule. --Alex Tora 23:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's a naming convention at Commons:WikiProject_Flags#Naming_convention. There are no hard rules, we tend to avoid those, but I would like to think that users would act within the realms of established consensus. Check out the naming on all these flags, for instance. — Giggy 23:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please show me official regulations of commons and meta that prohibits me to use my personal naming in my images. --Alex Tora 23:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- As far as I know, you are unable to upload images using an IP. You can upload images with this account if you wish. However, I must echo what Riana and Tony have said above. Please do not attempt to name images with your personal naming preferences. You are welcome to add them to a subpage, and to add your name to the image description page for accreditation - indeed, we encourage you to. I will not unblock your IP (it expires after 24 hours regardless) as you have clearly been using it to try and get around the community consensus, and convention, that has been explained to you. — Giggy 23:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Giggy, Under what reasons did you block my IP? I do usefull work by uploading rare images. I name them as I like to. Thats my rigth as an author. Be so kind to reblok my IP and let me be as I want with my images. --Alex Tora 22:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please do not use your IP, 202.249.210.121 (talk · contribs), to try and get around this. It's been blocked for 24 hours. — Giggy 22:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Alex, I saw the mini edit war over the name, but it seems that the only control we retain when donating images under free licenses is the ability to have the work credited to us. Your works are obviously appreciated so I hope you keep them coming. I hope the renamed version properly credits you, if you want to retain the image in your personal upload gallery the easiest thing is to re-upload it over top of the existing file. Best wishes for the coming new year. :-) --Tony Wills 22:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- (<--) On the other hand, if you upload your images under a free license, we're able to upload them wherever we want as they are now effectively "our images". I don't want to do that though...— Giggy 23:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- (<--) Hi there Alex, you're quite correct about being entitled to name images as you so desire, however, you're releasing your work under a free licence, and any other user is totally free to upload any of your images provided they follow the licence requirements, it's probably not worth going against the flow on this, the image titles that other users are proposing are far more helpful to casual users looking for an image and as has been mentioned, you're still receiving full attribution, so I'm at a loss as to why your preferred naming convention is necessary. Please don't let this small disagreement spiral out of control with further blocks and sanctions. Cheers, Nick 00:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nick, thank you for advice. I've pasted
![]() |
The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it
for any purpose, provided that original naming wil be preserved.
Usage notes:
|
![]() Please check that the conditions given above are compliant to the Commons licensing policy. Most importantly, derivative work and commercial use must be allowed.
|
to all images I wanted the naming be preserved. But I will stop my colaboration with commons because I have no any methods to preserve my original naming in images that were uploaded with fully free license. I dont want my works be renamed even without any notification of mine, the author. I dont like this commons "communism". Bless you!--Alex Tora 00:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I hate to be a party popper or anything, but you've already licenced your images under the Creative Commons Attribution licence, which is a non revokable licence - you can't change to your new copyright message I'm afraid. This means all your work presently on Commons which was originally licenced as CC-BY can be renamed without impacting on your recent decision, something which can only apply to new uploads. Can I ask though, why is it essential you use a filename which may be unhelpful for users looking for images ? Nick 02:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I paste my nickname into the naming of images which Ive upload under the free license to show that these works were created by me (The images are better to find by catogories not names, so I see no resaon for renaming my files) I find no freedom for artists here nor spirit of cooperation among admins. Its very unpleasnt place. I wont share my works anymore with such stubborn and ungrateful persons! Bye!--Alex Tora 00:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- If sorting out the images that you uploaded are an issue, then once the tool server comes back online, you can use this page to see. I am personally glad you are making the artwork of Japanese flags and Ukrainian coat of arms. I do understand that you want to let people know you made the graphic, which is absolutely fine, but it is just the way you do it now is causing problems. The way you named the photographs you took is absolutely fine and that works for us. If you have any questions, let me know. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 15:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Please correct Image:Kimono-hanmotu1.png
[edit]Hello, and thank your for sharing your Image:Kimono-hanmotu1.png with Commons. Your Image:Kimono-hanmotu1.png incorrectly depict Japanese Tanmono. The cylindrical part of your Image:Kimono-hanmotu1.png is reversed. Please correct the cylindrical part of your Image:Kimono-hanmotu1.png. I am the creator of Image:Kimono nagagi structure stylized tanmono.png. Thank you. --japanese culture soyokaze 09:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
すみません。何が間違っているかよくわかりません。japanese culture soyokazeさんの画像とそっくりです。もう一度説明していただけませんか。--Alex Tora 11:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
re:長崎市の市旗
[edit]はじめまして、Alexさん。コメント有難うございます。ご存知だと思いますが、日本の自治体は市町村章のみをきっちりと制定して、旗は慣習に任せる(de jureではなくde factoである)ということが多いようです。長崎市もその一例だと思います。そういった場合は現実に使われている例を確認するしかないので、Googleでひたすら使用例の画像を検索しました。この画像やこの画像から判断する限り、長崎市の旗は白地に赤と考えて良いのではないかと思います。もっとも、正式な旗はこのデザイン・色とは別に存在するという可能性ももちろん否定はできないので、本当は長崎市に直接問い合わせるべきなのでしょうね。 :) Kzaral 04:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Kyotofu_fusho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Alex_K_Halych-Volynia.svg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Alex_K_Halych-Volynia.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ahonc (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Alex_K_Vijsko_zaporozke.svg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Alex_K_Vijsko_zaporozke.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ahonc (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Hiroshima_kensho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Nagasakiken_kensho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Shigaken_kensho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Nagasaki_shisho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Yamaguchiken_kensho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alex_K_Yamanashiken_kensho.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ahonc (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Coat of arms od Protectorate
[edit]Your coats of arms and flags are great! I understand, taht you are so quite buissy, but mayby you'll have a while to draw coat of arms of Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia (Протекторат Богемії і Моравії). I ask you for it because as you can see the one we have now is looks terrible.
-
old one
-
Modern CoA of Bohemia
-
Modern CoA of Moravia
-
Czechoslovak CoA (apropriate colours, I suppose)
j_a1 (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. I:ll try to fulfill your request next sunday or next week. Bless you!--Alex Tora (talk) 04:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't want to hurry you up, but I am affraid that you forget about my request. If you don't have time or will to do it just say it. j_a1 (talk)
- No I remember it. I just have no enough time and inspiration. The work is not so easy as Ive thought before.--Alex Tora (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks...
- No I remember it. I just have no enough time and inspiration. The work is not so easy as Ive thought before.--Alex Tora (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Zwiad_kozacki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
~/w /Talk 11:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]I have asked for comment at w:Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board#Problems_with_Khmelnytsky_Uprising_category_on_Commons and notified its Ukrainian counterpart.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Niech będzie pochwalony Jezus Chrystus!
- If you see problems in my actions, normaly, you should ask me about them here, at my talk page, not somewhere at wikipedia. So, let me explain you again my vision of the Khmelnytsky Uprising cat here.
1)The cat exists to make the search of all images related to Khmelnytsky Uprising easier. Dont you think so?
2)The participants of Khmelnytsky Uprising have direct and clear relation to the Uprising. It is clear as a sun in the sky.
3) Jan Kazimierz was participant of Khmelnytsky Uprising. He fought at Zborov in 1649 and encouraged troops at Berestechko in 1651. So, your question "should Jan Kazimierz Waza be in this category?" is rather strange.
4)The images of Cossacks and Polish soldiers are necessary to present the image of troops of both sides of that time. As you have noticed "they (images with Cossacks) may be from any period of time in 17th century, plus minus a few decades", therefore they have a relation (not direct probably) to the war in Ukraine.
5)The Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was "overcroweded" by images. Ive thought that it would not be a great harm to delete the cat from images concerning Cossacks. At least now the Category:Cossacks is a part of Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. So I see no problems. --Alex Tora (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Skifska_pecktoral_clear.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Rename requests
[edit]Please, read the rename reguests in File:Herb Moskovia-1 (Alex K).svg and File:Herb Moskovia-2 (Alex K).svg. —Gleb Borisov (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I see no need to change the namig of these images. They are the part of my series of COA of Eastern European countries, like this one File:Herb Lytwa (Alex K).svg or this one File:Herb Polska (Alex K).svg. Also I would ask you not to delete correct information from the images, i've uploaded. Be free to add what you like to, but do not cut the information.--Alex Tora (talk) 06:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have to say that this infomation is incorrect, my friend. This is the coat of arms of the en:Tsardom of Russia, NOT of the en:Grand Duchy of Moscow (=Muscovy, as you've written there). These countries are not the same, they existed in two differnt time periods. Grand Duchy of Moscow is an ancestor of the Tsardom of Russia.
In the case of the English destription of the image (Muscovite Tsardom), SUCH country didn't exist at all.
About the Japanese translation: I deleted it, because I couldn't correct it due to absence of Japanese language skills.
So, I advise you at least to open the Wikipedia articles to make sure that I'm right. And after all this is wiki. You cannot deny anyone of editing. --Gleb Borisov (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC) - I'm waiting for your reply. --Gleb Borisov (talk) 12:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Read this book Вернадский Г.В. Московское царство. в 2-х. тт. Москва: Аграф, 2001. The term Muscovite Tsardom (Московское царство) was coined by russian historians, not me. It always better to read hisriography than wikipediography. Bless you!--Alex Tora (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- One book written by american immigrant in XX century can't create new state "Muscovite Tsardom"
- Read this book Вернадский Г.В. Московское царство. в 2-х. тт. Москва: Аграф, 2001. The term Muscovite Tsardom (Московское царство) was coined by russian historians, not me. It always better to read hisriography than wikipediography. Bless you!--Alex Tora (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have to say that this infomation is incorrect, my friend. This is the coat of arms of the en:Tsardom of Russia, NOT of the en:Grand Duchy of Moscow (=Muscovy, as you've written there). These countries are not the same, they existed in two differnt time periods. Grand Duchy of Moscow is an ancestor of the Tsardom of Russia.
coat of arms of SSR Lithuania and Belarus
[edit]Hello, I am dunkerqueenflandre, could you if you like to realize the coat of arms of the SSR Lithuania and Belarus I puts you the reference of the site thank you very much good evening
[[1]] --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Good evening! Nice to meet you. Unfortunatelly I have no materials on coat of arms of the SSR Lithuania and Belarus. Besides this I'll be busy with my studies for half a year, so I wont devote my time to drawing and wikipedia. Sorry. Maybe, we can talk again in August or Semptember. Bless you!--Alex Tora (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Japanese Flag
[edit]Thank you for creating Japanese flag image, File:Flag of Hiroshima Prefecture.svg, File:Alex K Shigaken kenki.svg, File:Flag of Nagasaki Prefecture.svg and File:Flag of Yamaguchi Prefecture.svg. But this original sources may have copyright. If you think that your flag image is not copyrightable, you can add Template:PD-ineligible at contributor-responsibility. Any untagged images will be deleted.
初めましてKnuaと申します。日本の旗の投稿ありがとうございます。残念ながら貴方が投稿した旗にオリジナルが著作権期間内のものがありました。これらの画像に著作権性が無いと考えるならばTemplate:PD-ineligibleを貼ることが可能です。ライセンスタグの無い画像は削除されます。ご注意ください。--Knua (talk) 18:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Following files is not still modified.
File:Aomori-shiki (Alex K).svg File:Flag of Yamaguchi Prefecture.svg File:Flag of Nagasaki Prefecture.svg File:Flag of Hiroshima Prefecture.svg File:Symbol of Kyoto Prefecture.svg
- Above-mentioned files will be requested deletion soon if not corrected.--Knua (talk) 15:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Please correct Image:Ukraine_census_2001_Ukrainians.svg
[edit]Please correct your map as per discussion. [2] [3] Garik 11 (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- REMINDER. Please pay attention and correct your map. According to the 2001 census, the number of ethnic Ukrainians in Crimea is 24.3%, and not 58.5%! Garik 11 (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Still not fixed
[edit]http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Ukraine_census_2001_Ukrainians.svg I strongly urge you to correct this Ukraine_census_2001_Ukrainians.svg. We strive for correctness and honesty in the representation of the data. Please let me know how to do it if you dont have the ability to correct it your self.
Будь-ласка виправте неточності. Це дуже важливо для репутації вікіпедії.
RonRodex (talk) 21:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed by Drubdia.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Oseledec_TarasBulba.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ferengi (talk) 08:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Kijów Voivodship
[edit]But it is Kijów Voivodship that was the name of the voivodship in that time, neither Kyiv, nor Kiev!
Герби Украiни
[edit]Вiтаю, та дякую за чудовi малюнки! Чи зможеш зробити цi три герби УРСР? Iх у нас ще бракуэ. Успiхiв!--Kwasura (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Ukraine geology.png
[edit]Дякую за гарну роботу, проте кольори не відповідають стандартним, загальноприйнятим у геології і тектоніці. Так, Укр. щит і Воронезький масив - мають бути у червоно-рожевих тонах, Карпатська і Кримська складчасті області - жовто-гарячі (Альпійська складчастість), а ДДЗ і Донбас - сірі і коричневі тони. --Helgi (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Watermarked images
[edit]Hi! I would like to point out that watermarking images is strongly discouraged on Commons (and any other project). Besides, you only lessen the encyclopedic value of your work and the work will have to be attributed to you anyway (by other means) by the licensing requirements. Also, removing existing watermarks from images is perfectly allowable by the licensing terms required at Commons. So, as a result you only deteriorate your image's quality and waste other editors' time – the watermarks will be removed sooner or later by someone anyway. Please do not revert back to watermarked images either. If you really want to help in such situation, then you could upload the clean originals instead. Just like article writers don't add their signatures to the articles, so should not the artists sign their illustrations. I hope you understand and I apologize for this annoying rant. —Quibik (talk) 10:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- "Discouraged" doesnt mean "prohibited"! Bless you!--Alex Tora (talk) 07:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, we don't delete images because of watermarking. Still, in cases where a clean version is available, the clean one is clearly preferable to the watermarked versions and should be used instead. —Quibik (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- As an author I prefer to see my works with watermarks.--Alex Tora (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Since this seems to be going nowhere, I asked for an outside opinion at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Watermarked_images_by_Alex_Tora. —Quibik (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- As an author I prefer to see my works with watermarks.--Alex Tora (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, we don't delete images because of watermarking. Still, in cases where a clean version is available, the clean one is clearly preferable to the watermarked versions and should be used instead. —Quibik (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Uploading images with watermarks is tolerated since other users can remove them (hopefully) prior to the use in the articles. Watermark removal is one of the many maintenance jobs volunteers perform on Commons. Please do not obstruct it. --Jarekt (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Can you explain at last? Are images with watermark prohibited or not? If not, I see no reasonable arguments to follow your claim.--Alex Tora (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- They are not prohibited because we assume that sooner or later someone will come and correct them. The license specifically allows it and the corrected image is more useful for articles. Reverts to the inferior versions can be seen as a form of vandalism. The name of the author is not necessary in the image itself since according to the license he has to be properly attributed, usually in the caption of the image, or as in case of wikipedias in the page devoted to the image accessible after clicking on the image. Watermarking within the EXIF data is also allowed, and encouraged. --Jarekt (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Адміністративний поділ україни 20 століття
[edit]Прошу створити карту, на якій би були одночасно зображені всі регіони України, такі як Волинь, Слобожанщина, Прикарпаття, Закарпаття, Галичина, Буковина, Подніпров'я та інші, бо в інтернеті, на жаль, таку знайти неможливо (щоб вона була у культурному та зручному для сприйняття вигляді). Здогадуюсь, що маєш під рукою літературу, від якої відштовхувався, малюючи всі карти, що знаходяться тут: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_the_Ukrainian_ethnic_regions. Думаю, не лише я відчуваю потребу у цьому матеріалі. Тому потрібна карта з усіма регіонами одночасно, хіба що різнокольоровими. Дякую завчасно, Антон із Сум.
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Kyiv-kozak.svg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Kyiv-cerkva.svg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Halych-Volhyn.svg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Vijsko Zaporozke.svg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I've noted - you've add [4] [5] - can you clarify an scholar source (like this one[6]) which suggest them as OUN-M flags - Also about [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] - per this text [17] - UPA actually does not have officially adopted uniform - and even have no resources to made it - so can you suggest a source which indicate listed above images as an actual uniform whic exist and used by UPA. Or all images it's simply a result of your own imagination - i.e. never actually existed and used? ThanksJo0doe (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your notification. The source is linked to all pictures. Its up to "your own imagination” to trust it or not.--Alex Tora (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your respond - could you clarify -[18] - the mentioned source linked to [19] [20] does not mentioned any OUN-M flags. The same author here [21] does not suggest the existance (nor images) of the unified uniform of the UPA appeared as [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31]. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Kuban 1926.png
[edit]Dear editor I've checked the Statistical geography image [32] created by you and found it's almost completely statistically (factually) inaccurate. Therefore I kindly ask you to delete it or allow me to nominate them for deletion. Thank you P.S. Similar problem exist with [33], [34], [35] [36] [37] [38] Thank you.Jo0doe (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Dear Alex Tora! Can you correct a typo in АзВовске Море? Is it possible add a Bucharest as other ajacent countries have capitals depicted? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. I will correct images and load them in SVG later. Unfortunately, I had no enough time and I do not know how soon I would be able to correct them.--Alex Tora (talk) 06:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- This typo is present at other your maps, I see. So the task is more complex. Merry Xmas and Happy New Year! Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. I will correct images and load them in SVG later. Unfortunately, I had no enough time and I do not know how soon I would be able to correct them.--Alex Tora (talk) 06:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Great work
[edit]Your job on Wikipedia is really good. Best regards!--SeikoEn (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Alex Tora (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Alex K Kingdom of Poland
[edit]Hi. I noticed that You are the author of files: File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland3.svg, File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland.svg, File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland-flag.svg. Could you give any source that source, book, file that those images were based on? Thank You for help and information. JDavid (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Привіт. Я помітив, що Ви є автором файлів: File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland3.svg, File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland.svg, File:Alex K Kingdom of Poland-flag.svg. Не могли б ви дати яку-небудь джерело, джерело, книга, файл, що ці зображення були засновані на? Дякуємо за допомогу та інформацію. JDavid (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Ukrainian — not Ukranian
[edit]Добрий день! Hello, congratulations on your work in creating heraldry! However, in your uploading information, please use the correct spelling — "Ukrainian", rather than "Ukranian". Many thanks! --Very trivial (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ukrainophobia-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blacklake (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ukrainophobia-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blacklake (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Zaporozhian Sich flag.svg та iнши запорiзьки прапори
[edit]На жаль, File:Zaporozhian Sich flag.svg, обгрунтований на вашому джерелi ("Клейноди України. З історії державної і національної символіки: комплект з кольорових художніх листівок" / упор. Ю.Д.Прилюк; худ. О.П.Білецький. — К. : Абрис, 1991.), входить в протирiччя з книжкою Мамчак М. Військово-морська символіка України. Снятин, ПрутПринт, 2009, де сказано (див тут):
- "Перші флотилії козацького флоту з кінця XV століття виходили з Січі в походи Чорним морем під малинового кольору січовою корогвою, на лицьовому боці якої був зображений золотий хрест в оточенні небесних світил, а на зворотному – зображення святого Архангела Михаїла, предводителя і воєводу Небесного Воїнства і покровителя козаків під час морських походів".
Найближча до джерела версiя вже iснує: File:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG. Але, в неї є певнi помилки:
- 1. Колер цього прапору, щось, не малиновий.
- 2. Якщо це один i той же самий прапор (аверс i реверс), то древко винно бути десь з одного боку, а десь з iншого.
Таким чином, i ваш варіант має значні відмінності:
- 1. Щось Михаїл дуже схожий на спішеного Георгiя-Переможця (вбива змiя /хоч і морського/).
- 2. Знов - той самий "не той" колер, як в джерелі.
- 3. Вiльний край прапору "трьозубий" (Це окрема справа, оскiльки крім вже вказанного File:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG iснує ще одне зображення "лицьового боку": див. File:Прапор В.З..png, котре, як ви можете бачити, теж прямокутне. Як це може бути з прапором, який з одного боку прямокутний, а з iншого - "трьозубий"?)
Але й File:Прапор В.З..png (хоч це й "не ваша робота") має певні помилки!:
- 1. Центральний хрест винен бути прямим, а не нагадувати "залізний" німецький хрест (див. старовиннi гравюри, наприклад, тут "Знамёна казаков" © Russian Centre of Vexillology and Heraldry. All rights reserved last modified 8.12.2009).
- 2. Кр. того, згiдно з все тим же джерелом (Мамчак М. "Військово-морська символіка України"), посилаючимся на iсторични згадки, колер цього прапору винен бути малиновим (а менi щось здаеться, що вiн ближчий до алого).
- 3. Вiдсутня зворотна сторона цiєї корогви.
Таким чином: вважаючи ваш значний внесок зображень та досвід графiчної роботи, не могли б ви поправити вказанi помилки згаданих вище запорізьких прапорів (колер, та iн. там, де вам буде краще, а краще - скрiзь). Я був би дуже вам вдячний. Sceptic (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Unification of Ukraine with Russia has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JuTa 19:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Groundless claims
[edit]Hi
Perhaps you would be so kind as to refrain from such claims on my intelligence as to make "groundless claims".
The link was there for you to follow and check the information yourself, I am assuming that you did not click the link - if you had, you would have surely seen that the text was clearly copied from a copyrighted website (©2001 All Rights Reserved. Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies.}. As such, surely it is not hard for you to understand that including copyrighted text and claiming it as your own, let alone using it against copyright, is a clear breach of how things are done around here?
I would say that an apology would go down well, but suspect that you will not be so kind as to make one. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Symbol
[edit]This is not Sunni Islam symbol. File:Muslim-sunni.png Please rename it. Sunni Islam refers to w:Islam.--Officer (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Great work!--93.138.7.50 18:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Herb Kunaskoyi Narodnoyi Respubliky.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 23:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Upa 1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jafeluv (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Location of Cossack Hetmanate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
Дякую за відмінну якість графіки! Sprint2010 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
File:Меморіал пам'яті жертв Батуринської трагедії Цитадель.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 19:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sviatoslav oseledec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hermann von Eichhorn-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cube00 (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ukraine cencus 2001 Ukrainian.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AlwaysUnite (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/WLE_Austria_Logo_%28no_text%29.svg/85px-WLE_Austria_Logo_%28no_text%29.svg.png)
Вітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 03:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
coats of arms
[edit]Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at coadb@mail.com.
![]() |
File:Holodomor icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Poeticbent talk 14:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slavic languages.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slavic languages.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lviv-modern-coat-of-arms2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MarioBolo (talk) 09:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lviv-modern-coat-of-arms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MarioBolo (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-01.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-02.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-03.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-04.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-05.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-06.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-07.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-08.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-09-1.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-09.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-10.svg
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-00.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-02.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-03.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-04.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-05.svg
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-06.svg
Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 13:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:IOJIMA UKR ZENTAI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guanaco (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Iojima US invasion plan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guanaco (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Japonia j Iojima.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guanaco (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Белорусская социал-демократическая партия (Народная Грамада)
[edit]приветствую Вас. я заметил что вы ранее загружали логотип политической партии . не могли бы вы так же загрузить логотип партии Белорусская социал-демократическая партия (Народная Грамада). очень вас прошу. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.72.228.176 (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:USS kokarda.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Poeticbent talk 20:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Alex K Boncza 1 Ross-emper 18-19 c.svg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alex K Boncza 1 Ross-emper 18-19 c.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Coat of Arms of Moravia and related moravian historical flag
[edit]Hi, I would like to ask you this way, if you have some time, for vectorization of the Coat of Arms of Moravia used from 13th century to 1915, after 1918, resp 1920 till now (in the Great Coat of Arms of the Czech republic): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatssymbole_Tschechiens
and the historical flag, please too.
The files to vectorize:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Znak_Moravy.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Historick%C3%A1_moravsk%C3%A1_vlajka.png
The "difference" with the current SVG for Coat of Arms of Moravia (the same original author of the moravian eagle's graphics (heraldist), it was derived from: Jiří Louda: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_Louda)
is in the (this time) exact graphics according to the description in the act
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_symbols_of_the_Czech_Republic (Act No. 3/1993 refers to the national symbols and their usage)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatssymbole_Tschechiens (Gesetz Nr. 3/1993 Sb. über die Staatssymbole der Tschechischen Republik vom 17. Dezember 1992)
The related articles, concerning Moravia, Moravian Eagle, historical forms of the flag etc., where it could be used (infobox etc.):
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravsk%C3%A1_orlice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Moravia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Moravia (https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravsk%C3%A1_vlajka)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravia (https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morava)
Thanks --Pavel Fric (talk) 11:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herb Polska (Alex K).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Aomori-shisho (Alex K).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Xeror (talk) 11:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Attention
[edit]see [39]--Estopedist1 (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi Alex Tora. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ukranian Cossack-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Very trivial (talk) 00:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ivan Briukhovetsky.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Best, IronGargoyle (talk) 14:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hej, it's for you Il vecchio principe (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
File:Bohun yide do Rozlogiw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Seva Seva (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Danylo Apostol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Seva Seva (talk) 10:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nalivayko sever.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |