User talk:Sanandros/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

File:MG_74_in_an_execise.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MG_74_in_an_execise.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


Kategorie

Hallo!

Kannst du bitte folgendes Bild korrekt kategorisieren: File:Kraka Typ 640.jpg.

Danke im voraus! --High Contrast (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Hoffte eigetnlich, dass irgend wann ein Bot kommen würde, aber wenn es so wichtig ist dann kann ich schon machen--Sanandros (talk) 23:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Optimal wäre es, du würdest deine hochgeladenen Bilder schon während des Upload-Vorgangs mit Kategorien versehen - ohne Bot und Hinweise anderer. Du hast mehrfach gezeigt, dass du es kannst. --High Contrast (talk) 09:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm ja klar, aber darf man nicht auch flegmatisch sein?--Sanandros (talk) 12:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Slovoj.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Slovoj.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:FN_F2000_Slovenian_Soldier.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FN_F2000_Slovenian_Soldier.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:FN_F2000_Slovenian_Soldier.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Fehler

Kannst du bitte alle fehlende Angabe bei dieser Datei nachtragen? Zudem funktioniert die angegebene Quelle nicht. Kurioserweise verweist der Link offenbar auf eine US Marines-Seite, aber der Lizenzbaustein bezieht sich auf die US NAVY - da ist was faul. Bitte alle Mängel beseitigen. --High Contrast (talk) 18:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Eine nicht funktionierende Quelle ist kein Grund für eine Löschung, da du ja wissen solltest, dass das Internet schnelllebig ist, ist es gut möglich das die URL nicht mehr funktioniert. Durch die Militärische nähe der Beiden Teilstreitkräfte ist es auch nicht auszuschliessen, dass die USN als Lizenzträger da steht. Aber du als Admin kannst ja mal herausfinden wie die File ursprünglich hiess, da ich sie per Bad Name 2008 neu auf gesetzt habe. Die Datei habe ich irgend wann 2006 höchgeladen.--Sanandros (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Gemach, gemach. Von einer Löschung war KEINE Rede. Ich habe versucht die Datei ausfindig zu machen, was mir aber leider nicht gelang. Deshalb war es naheliegend den Hochlader - der du ja bist - zu fragen erstens die Mängel zu beseitigen und zweitens eventuelle urheberrechtliche Probleme zu diskutieren. Sowei so gut. Wie soll nun verfahren werden? --High Contrast (talk) 19:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Ja aber dort habe ich die Datei unter dem ursprünglichen Namen hoch geladen und vlt könnte man mit dem Namen nach googlen und vlt doch noch eine funktionierende Quelle finden. defensimagery funktioniert im Moment nicht und so können wir dort nicht suchen. Die Datei war aber mal einer meiner 1. Dateien die ich hoch geladen habe. Fing glaube ich mit eine 0 an. Aber noch eine Frage: Warum hast du die Datei als Quellenlos getagt?--Sanandros (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Crazy Horse Memorial June 2008.JPG

Ist nicht durch COM:FOP#United States abgedeckt, daher nicht ok auf Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 13:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Dann musst du aber auch gegen die anderen Fotos ein LA stellen.--Sanandros (talk) 13:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Muss wohl, hatte nicht gesehen das es davon noch mehr gibt. Stellen muss ich ihn nicht da es ihn bereits gibt, Commons:Deletion requests/Crazy Horse Memorial :( --Martin H. (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Dann ist ja gut.--Sanandros (talk) 21:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:PLA_PAP_Type_07_Woodland_Camouflage.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PLA_PAP_Type_07_Woodland_Camouflage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PLA_PAP_Type_07_Woodland_Camouflage.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Und hier bitte auch erklären--Sanandros (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:PLA_Air_Force_Type_07_Enlisted_Uniform.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PLA_Air_Force_Type_07_Enlisted_Uniform.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PLA_Air_Force_Type_07_Enlisted_Uniform.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Kannst du mir den Umstand erklären?--Sanandros (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Your transfers are incorrectly tagged

Take for example File:Glybbs Paper Plane.jpg. Here you claim to be te author ({{PD-self}}). It should be something like this. Multichill (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Yea that's true but I use CommonsHelper and sometimes there are bugs--Sanandros (talk) 13:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Please don't blame the bot for things a human should have caught. The bot is merely suggesting a description. If you use {{PD-self}} at the source, Commonshelper will change this to the right user (same goes for {{Self|some license}}). Multichill (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Unzulässige_Kategorieverschiebung

Hallo Sanandros!

Ich habe bemerkt, dass du dich in der oben angeführten Diskussion eingebracht hast und den Grundtenor bzw. die Aussage des Aufmerksammachers Roman teilst, in dem du zwei Beispielkategorie aufgeführt hast. Wenn du interesse hast dich weiterhin an dieser Diskussion zu beteiligen, dann kannst du das unter anderem hier tun: Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Category:AMX-32 tanks. Hier wird exemplarisch an einem Beispiel die Vorgehensweise und eine Rück-Umbennenung diskutiert. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 12:40, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Ja nur ist gerade im RL was sehr einschneidendes passiert worauf ich im Moment sehr wenig Zeit hab vlt nächstes WE wenn ihr noch Diskutiert.--Sanandros (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Hoffentlich nichts schlimmes! Nächste Woche wird sicherlich noch diskutiert - mach dir keinen unnötigen Zusatzstress. Ich wünsche dir das Beste. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Ja wir werden ja sehen....--Sanandros (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Type64pistol.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Type64pistol.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Type64pistol.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 18:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm no expert on Chinese issues so delete it or write to the original uploader.--Sanandros (talk) 16:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

re: M14

As the description says, it is an M39 EMR, as opposed to the similar, but distinct, M14 DMR. There is no category, to my knowledge, because there are only two images of it. Bahamut0013 (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The EMR is a replacement for the DMR, not an update. They are both iterations of the old M14, but still quite distinct weapons. The fact that the military has gone through the trouble to create an entirely new nomenclature, instead of appending a subsequent version number, is the most telling evidence of the difference. I could go into the barrel, action, stock, optics, and other accessories if you like. Bahamut0013 (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Well, to put it succinctly, they are all different. Most obvious is that the DMR has a green fiberglass stock that closely resembles the original M14 (except for the pistol grip), wheras the EMR uses an all-metal frame with a collapsable butt and Picatinny rails. The barrels are slightly different lengths with different treatments and manufacturers (and I believe, but not 100% certain, different rifling ratios), and the EMR's is free-floating while the DMR's is fixed. The optics typically issued with the DMR are commercial Leupold or Unertl scopes, while the EMR utilizes the M8541 Scout Sniper Day Scope as part of a standard set; both can use the gamut of military night vision and other specialty optics, or just about anything that will attach to a Picatinny rail. The bipods are essentially the same, but the EMR manual claims it is a nominally improved version of the Harris S-L (I do see a cosmetic difference, but not much in functionality IMO). As the articles I've linked to note, the EMR is noticably heavier by a few pounds without any accessories, and significantly more with all of its associated optics, accessories, and fully loaded. They do use the same ammunition, and I believe the magazines are at least interchangable if not identical, but that's speculation on my part because I haven't been abl to directly compare the magazines. The only images of the EMR I have been able to find online depict the M14 muzzle brake (which the DMRs have as well), but the only EMRs I've personally handled had a modified brake. The EMR uses a modified gas operating system, while the DMR's is not significantly different from the M14's. Additionally, the iron sights on the DMR are essentially unchanged, while the EMR's are improved. The EMR's trigger mechanism is also far more accurized than the DMR's was. I would love to be able to publish the User's and Repair manuals, but the Marine Corps online technical publications library is restricted to those with CAC access, and they are FOUO anyway. You could submit a Freedom of Information Act request for them, if you were so inclined.
I hope that clears the issue up. If you have any more questions, I would be happy to answer them to the best of my ability. If you can dispute any of what I've said, I would love to see your sources. If nothing else, the article on Wikipedia needs more. Bahamut0013 (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Mosul_insurgent_November_11_2004.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mosul_insurgent_November_11_2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

93.211.73.27 07:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Insurgents_in_Mosul.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Insurgents_in_Mosul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

93.211.73.27 07:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Scout_Ranger_group.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Scout_Ranger_group.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.107.239 15:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Sam231.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sam231.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


Copyright violations

Afrikaans | العربية | Azərbaycanca | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Simple English | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Commons-emblem-hand.svg Hello Sanandros.

It has come to our attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 19:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Konrad-Adenauer-Karikatur.jpg

Hallo Sanandros. Bei deinem Transfer ist etwas schiefgegangen. Bitte kontrolliere/ergänze OTRS-Ticket, Beschreibung, ... Danke! --Leyo 12:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Us navy

Hi Sanandros, I see you are currently creating new categories en mass. However you are doing so by adding categories to a redirect. Please change your script or actions to [[Category:United States Navy images by location]] instead of [[categorie:us navy]]. –Krinkletalk 08:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

File mover

The functionality of the template {{rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Turkish_Army_NATO_exercise.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Turkish_Army_NATO_exercise.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 13:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Galerien beobachten

Hi Sanandros! Mit dem Firefox plugin funktioniert das beobachten von Gallerien ziemlich gut. Ich hatte dir hier im Forum geantwortet. LG, Amada44  talk to me 16:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:M27_Infantry_Automatic_Rifle.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:M27_Infantry_Automatic_Rifle.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Leyo 14:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

File:M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M-32_Grenade_Launcher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 08:28, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:Good Morning America

Hallo!

Was war denn da mit dir los? Drei Rechtschreibfehler/Grammatikfehler in einem wenige Wörter umfassenden Satz. Kaputte Tastatur? Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 14:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Nein ich hatte nur die Englische Rechtschreibhilfe drin und so mit die Deutschen Rechtschreibfehler übersehen.--Sanandros (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:Items missing OTRS ticket ID

Hallo Sanandros. Bitte achte auf die Korrektheit des Commons-Transfers. Bei File:Glaeserne Manufaktur Dresden.JPG war dies nicht der Fall (OTRS-Baustein ohne Ticketnummer, no original description, …). --Leyo 23:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

"Keine Quelle"

Derartige Links beweisen nicht, dass ein Bild unter einer freien Lizenz steht. --High Contrast (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Wenn du mir jetzt auch noch den Zusammenhang erklährst...--Sanandros (talk) 13:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Es geht um dieses Bild. Wenn du das Bild auf army.mil findest, dann bitte den html-link einfügen und den Problem-Hinweis entfernen (zur Erinnerung: .jpg-Links werden auch nicht als valide Quellen aufgefasst). Zur Info: Auf http://www.defenseimagery.mil/ konnte ich es nicht finden. --High Contrast (talk) 19:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Done--Sanandros (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Steyr_AUG_Saudi_Marines.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Steyr_AUG_Saudi_Marines.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MilborneOne (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

U.S. Navy geographic photo categories

Could you possibly look in at Commons:Village pump#U.S. Navy geographic photo categories, since you seem to have had your hands on the category in question? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 03:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

File:069 Startbahn West.jpg

069 Startbahn West.jpg

Hi Sanandros,
Noticing the green cast on the image File:069 Startbahn West.jpg, I wanted to ask whether you would mind if I balanced the colours a little?
You're free to revert any changes, of course :-).
Best regards, --
ElHeineken (talk) 19:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

U can do that as i don't change usually levels. Merry Chrismas.--Sanandros (talk) 16:51, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you very much for your answer. If you're unhappy with the results, don't hesitate to contact me or revert the changes. --
sure it was done well thank u--Sanandros (talk) 15:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Kafić

Hi, i answered on your question--Ex13 (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Could you please explain...

Could you please go to the talk page and explain this edit...

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 19:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

This edit is correct per COM:OVERCAT. --High Contrast (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Yep Ouvercat--Sanandros (talk) 06:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Decorative_Pinol_Gourds.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Decorative_Pinol_Gourds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

M16 vs M4

The close rifle is M4, other 2 are M16

Hey, most of the rifles pictured by the IDF Spokeunit are M16, not M4. The main difference in pcitures is the special barrel of the M4, see picture in right for example. regrads, Netanel h (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok i'm semi convinced, cause the barrel looks ok but the handguard is too long for a M4 but too short for a M16. Also the only M16 without A1 or A2 buttstock is the M16A2E2. Can u tell me which version it is or is it a licensed M16?--Sanandros (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
There is a lot of variants of the M16 \ AR-15, and some are short version, which are very popular in the IDF, much more than the long version. there is also a version of old M16A1\M16A2 which were cutted to be a short version, usually in use for soldiers in training. see picture here for the differences between the 3 types: the long rifle is a regular M16, below short M16, and in the bottom 'cut off' M16A1\2. Netanel h (talk) 08:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok and who is producing the shortbarreled M16?--Sanandros (talk) 08:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
I believe shortbarreled M16 is made by the same manufacturers of the long-barreled M16. There are a lot of M-16 variants, some of them are shortbarreled, and it may produced by the same nanufacturers. The 'cut-off' version in the IDF are made by the IDF itself, mainly because it is cheaper to cut old long-barreled M16, than to buy a new one short. Netanel h (talk) 19:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Vektor SS-77

Hallo!

Danke für diese Zusätze - habe ich offenbar total vergessen einzufügen. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Kein ding war nicht so umständlich.--Sanandros (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Stg 58

Hast du vlt ein Bild zur de:Stg 58 oder schaffst du es irgend wie an die Stg 58 ran zu kommen um ein Bild zu machen? thx--Sanandros (talk) 23:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Derzeit eher unwahrscheinlich...
Ich kann aber mal nachfragen was sich da so machen lässt, wird aber sicherlich ein Weilchen dauern. Nachdem das 58er eigentlich mehr oder wenige nur ein FN FAL ist kann mman ja mal ein Bild aus dessen Kategorie mit entsprechendem Hinweis einbinden.
--D-Kuru (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ja ok kann man auch machen. --Sanandros (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

File:James Stavridis visits the ISAF Joint Command at Kabul Afghanistan International Airport -c.jpg

Hi,

There is also a release number on this picture, 100526-A-9209M-52, could you confirm it's a US valid one, and if so, from which force? --Dereckson (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

P.S. I found 10 others John Scott Rafoss pictures, so thank you again for your search and clarification.

Hmm that's a difficult pic the VIRIN indicates that it is an Army pic. Part of that VIRIN is the Vision ID wich indentifies the fotografer, in this case 9209M. But somehow I found two fotographers with that ID: Maria Moy (scroll down) and Michal Mitztka. But I coulnd't fine any other pics of Maria Moy with VIRINs so I think its associated with Michal. As there also exist other pics form Afghanistan with him. But a better proof I couldn't find. And your welcome to help you with the pics of Scott Rafoss.--Sanandros (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
So the best is to keep our PD-USGov-Military-Army template (it's an -A-) and note the two authors as possible ones? --Dereckson (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I'd say it's Michal Mitzka and not Maria Moy who took the pic, cause i found also a pic shot in April 2010 and the pic from up is June. Our questionable pic is May, and Michal Mitzka was in June also there. Addinonaly the ISAF never published a pic of Maria Moy.--Sanandros (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File:BSAG soldiers shoot.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:42, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

RAID pics

May u plz proof the copyright violation? Thx--Sanandros (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The uploader have said that "AFP" is the author of the pictures : "AFP" means Agence France-Presse the main French press agency ;)--Bapti 14:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
May u eventually check if the RAID badge has really a own copyright by the photographer it self? For me this looks like "This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work" and at least on German WP the RAID badge is PD (in France also?) as it is a governmental work which is used mostly in governmental ways. Maybe u could discuss it with other (German) admins.--Sanandros (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
In France, the governmental work is unfortunately under copyright in opposition to the USA for exemple. I don't see why this picture could be under public domain (I have deleted it among other copyvios).--Bapti 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
But we can eventually upload it again on german WP under PD-Govermental Works which includes logos which are mainly for governmental use. As we for example uploaded the logo of the Israeli intelligence service AMAN.--Sanandros (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't know the policies on german WP but this doesn't refer to Wikimedia Commons ;)--Bapti 15:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
That's why i asked u at the beginning to contact a german admin who is able to check that pic so we can eventually upload it at german wp again.--Sanandros (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to do so but I'm not a contributor on german WP.--Bapti 15:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Berichte PUK Vorkomnisse im EMD vom 17 November 1990.pdf

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Seal walking with a tire.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seal walking with a tire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

188.104.98.28 11:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

File:The end of Hell Weekjpg.jpeg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ShabakLogo.gif

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ShabakLogo.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Afghan commandos Image 3 of 5.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


File:Afghan commandos Image 5 of 5.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


File:The Hungarian 34 th Laszlo Bercsenyi Special Forces Battalion - Great Capabilities with Greater Complications .pdf

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


File:9K111 FAGOT 120mm of the 34th Hungarian Special Forces Battalion.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Operation Southern Partner 2.jpg

Hallo!

Bitte füge bei Bildern, die offensichtlich nicht von offiziellen US-(Militär)-Seiten kommen diesen tag: {{Licensereview}} ein. Dies hat mehrere Vorteile: ein anderer User schaut über diese Bilder und bestätigt, dass es sich um die angegebene Lizenz handelt, was sozusagen als "ewige" Versicherung gilt. Oft ist es nämlich so, dass diese nicht offiziellen Webseiten schneller wieder verschwinden, als uns Commonisten Recht ist. Danke und Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Ich habs gleich mal auf alle pics gemacht die ich in dem Zuge hochgeladen habe--Sanandros (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Sanandros, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Armbrust (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Al Jazeera in India : Categorisation

Hi, please use useful categories and don't over-categorize your images, i.e. please do not categorize your uploads (an example of your recent activity):

Category:Politicians of India = {categorise}
Category:Prayers
Category:Religion in India = {categorise}
Category:Kolkata = {categorise}

etc.

You'll help to save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:

Category:Politicians of West Bengal and for example Category:People of Kolkata, Category:Hinduism in stateORterritoy or Category:Puja etc.

Please use as far as possible the 'most fitting"' category(ies). Do not add - in addition - the categories of the "parent category", among them cities, states and countries etc.

For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.

Thank you for your assistance, Roland 18:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

That with Calcutta I could have done (even it's not so common to have a cat for the people of a town), but with the others I was not sure if the Politicians are really West Bengal or coming from all over India and also with the Religion i was not sure if that was really Hindu. And btw the pics are not mine they are done by Al Jazeera English and a lot more of theme need some categorization--Sanandros (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

MyNewsDesk image

I wondered if you read and took into consideration the deletion nomination before deciding on passing this licence review? The licence for this and several other MyNewsDesk images have not been confirmed by Sony BMG Sweden despite several requests for confirmation. Ww2censor (talk) 04:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

OK i took it back--Sanandros (talk) 08:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
For the moment I think that is a better choice. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Exercise Eager Lion 12 - Aqaba Image 4 of 4.jpg

Da haste wohl die falsche Lizenz erwischt, oder? --Quedel (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Da war einer in der Zukunft und hat ein Foto geschossen ist aber in der Vergangenheit gestorben^^ --Sanandros (talk) 22:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Zeitreisen mal rückwärts. Daher haben die Wahrsager also ihr Wissen :) --Quedel (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Iranian soldier.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Iranian soldier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

VSB registration

If you have trouble with the questions, you can e-mail me what username you would like and I'll set you up. --Pcj (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Army of Brazil

Hi, "Army of Brazil" is a main category now, pictures and media files should be moved into the right subcategories. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wagnerlopes (talk • contribs) 16:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Resolved--Sanandros (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Ruth Waterbury

Hello Sanandros, I don't recall uploading a picture of Ruth Waterbury, but her name does appear on many photos I've taken from old Photoplay magazines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfbarlow (talk • contribs)

Yes check.svg Resolved--Sanandros (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Counterterrorismwiki.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Counterterrorismwiki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Resolved--Sanandros (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

IMHO

Hi Sanandros, so im direkten Talk mag "as u r anyway" ja akzeptabel sein, aber in der Adminbewerbung würde ich die Worte doch korrekt ausschreiben, weil einerseits mancher das gar nicht versteht und andererseits solche Amerikanismen zumindest für Engländer etc. vermutlich eine Verachtung ihrer Sprache darstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Wirklich? Ich dachte das wäre dort auch noch aufgeschlossener. Aber nun ja dann werde ich es korrigieren.--Sanandros (talk) 06:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Btw hast du noch Rechtschreibfehler gesehen? Denn selbst mit spellchecker unterlaufen mir so viele Fehler.--Sanandros (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
O.k., ich war mal so frei. Das mit der Dysl. wusste ich garnicht und hab es in all den Jahren auch nie bemerkt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Kein Problem, aber dass dir das nie aufgefallen ist... Es kommt öfters mal irgend wo als Antwort dass man mein Text, weil zu viel Chaos drin, nicht versteht.--Sanandros (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Verschieben von einigen Navy Seals Bildern

Rein fürs Verständnis würde mich interessieren warum du einige Navy Seals Bilder verschoben hast. ([1],[2],[3]) --Slick (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Damit ich sie hinter einander habe, denn ansonsten sind sie quer verteilt und man kann sie nicht richtig kategorisieren bzw man erwischt evlt ein falsches mit Hot Cat wenn man im Hunderter Bereich ist.--Sanandros (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Administrator

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−


Ein Willkommenspräsent für unseren neuen Administrator von deinen Kollegen…

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Sanandros! Du hast jetzt die Rechte eines Administrators auf Commons. Nimm dir bitte einen Moment Zeit, um dir die Seite Commons:Administratoren und die in Verbindung mit der Beobachtungsliste stehenden Seiten durchzulesen (insbesondere Commons:Administrators' noticeboard und Commons:Deletion requests), bevor du damit beginnst, Seitenlöschungen, Accountsperrungen oder Änderungen am Seitenschutzstatus bzw. an den geschützten Seiten selbst durchzuführen. Der Großteil der Bearbeitungen eines Administrators kann durch andere Administratoren wieder rückgängig gemacht werden, mit Ausnahme der Zusammenführung von Versionsgeschichten, die deshalb mit spezieller Obacht behandelt werden muss.

Wir laden dich herzlich ein, mit uns auf IRC Kontakt aufzunehmen: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Es gibt auch einen Channel für Commons-Admins, der für sensiblere Themen sowie zur Koordination unter Admins genutzt werden kann. Du findest zudem in dem Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit vielleicht eine nützliche Lektüre.

Bitte überprüfe, ob du in der Commons:List of administrators und den jeweils nach Datum oder Sprache sortierten Listen eingetragen wurdest und ergänze deine Daten andernfalls.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the team. You may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. Feel free to add to it or edit it. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your trust in me. But James why do u not move your page out of the user namepsace an call it something like "COM:Administrator tools and templates"--Sanandros (talk) 00:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I suggested that a while ago and there was no consensus in favor of it. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Ah i c.--Sanandros (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Welcome, good luck and if you ever have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! Trijnsteltalk 15:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your offer.--Sanandros (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Images from US Navy, location San Diego, California

Hi Sanandros, I noticed your work on military images and would like to ask for your help in Category:Images from US Navy, location San Diego, California. This is a disambiguation category that's filled with images for some months now and should be emptied. Your knowlegde about these contents is much better than mine, so if you find some time it would be great if you find better categories and remove the disambig cat. There's no need to hurry also :) Tx, --Funfood 13:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Yea ok i will c what i can do and how much time i have in the next few days.--Sanandros (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your question

I have answered your question on my user talk page. Thank you! Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 06:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Germany-New Zealand size comparison

File:Germany-New Zealand size comparison.svg

Is this approximately what you need? --Siebengang (talk) 16:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Humorous Phases of Funny Faces.ogg

Hallo Sanandros, kannst Du die erste Version der Datei löschen? Du hast nur wrote on disk und let's c hinzugefügt. Gibt es irgendwelche Gründe gegen eine Löschung? Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 22:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Danke, leider meinte ich hier die Urversion, die gelöscht werden sollte. Diese enthält den modernen Klavier-Track, der „weg“ muss. Kannst Du „meine“ beschnittene Version wiederherstellen und die jetzige löschen? Danke --Ras67 (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
So sollte es in ordung sein--Sanandros (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Alix and Nicky in Russian dress.3.jpg

Kannst Du die letzte (aktuelle) Version von Arachn0 löschen? Für die farbige Variante besteht leider keine Lizenz. Danke. --Ras67 (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Barceloneta Girl.jpg

Hallo Sanandros, könntest Du bitte die ältesten zwei unverpixelten Versionen des Bildes löschen? Vielleicht hat es dann eine Chance, nicht komplett gelöscht zu werden. Danke.--Ras67 (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Mache ich nicht gerne wenn es während eines DRs ist, aber weise doch als Vorschlag deutlich darauf hin die ersten 2 Versionen zu löschen und den Rest zu behalten.--Sanandros (talk) 18:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Anastasia.jpg

Hallo Sanandros, könntest Du bitte diese Version (die zweite von unten) des Bildes löschen? Sie war die Quelle dieses gelöschten Bildes. Danke --Ras67 (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

da hattest du glück, noch vor ein paar Tagen war ich für eine weile weg...--Sanandros (talk) 22:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Shams bahari

Hi Sanandros , Shams bahari is Persian, not Arab. I asked Mardetanhato check it out. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank u very much, I always have problems with farsi and arabic as i can't read that.--Sanandros (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

UserB (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Forward Operating Base Bostick

Hello, I noticed that you removed this category from some photos that mention Forward Operating Base Naray in their descriptions. Forward Operating Base Naray was renamed to Forward Operating Base Bostick. [4] List of photos:

Rybec (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I removed theme because they are for me located accurate enough, soemthing like "south of FOB" could be 20 or 30 km away from the FOB if they are near the FOB then i usually categorize them in the district where the FOB is.--Sanandros (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your assistance please

You recently deleted File:House searches in Parwan -a.jpg in favour of File:Defense.gov News Photo 110221-A-3304L-105 - U.S. Army Sgt. Robert Streeter scans a nearby hilltop during a search of the Qual-e Jala village Parwan province Afghanistan on Feb. 21 2011.jpg. The file you kept was uploaded months after the picture was taken. Can I ask when the image you deleted was uploaded? Geo Swan (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The file u uploaded had approximately 1000px while the Defense.mil version has more than 3000px. I hope you can understand that right now.--Sanandros (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Please appreciate that the project's human contributors are volunteers. Robot uploaders, on the other hand, can't quit, can't have their feelings hurt. I suggest, all other things being equal, it should be the image uploaded by the human volunteer which should be kept. It requires wise human judgment to properly categorize images. Almost no robot uploaded images are well categorized. Many robot uploaded images never get wisely categorized.
You added three categories to a robot uploaded image. Were those the categories that had been added to the human uploaded image by sentient humans? Did you copy over all the categories? What was the original URL of the human uploaded image?
Alternately, you could have added the URL of the robot uploaded image to the {{information}} template of the human uploaded image, uploaded the higher resolution image found by the robot over the smaller human uploaded image, and then deleted the robot uploaded duplicate.
Note, the name of the human uploaded image implies the image was one of a series. So, throwing away the URL used by the human uploader was a mistake as it robs interested parties of a route to find the related images in that series.
Personally, I think this would have been a particularly good choice, if the human uploaded image came first.
So, I am going to repeat the question you did not choose to answer: when was the human uploaded image uploaded.
Let my thanks here be proportional to the effort you make to be helpful. Geo Swan (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry to hurt your feelings but I had also to learn that my pics where deleted cause we've uplod new pics by bots wich r better.--Sanandros (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The versions of images uploaded by robots aren't necessarily "better" images. Many robot uploaded images remain essentially unclassified because the classification used by the robot uploaders are almost worthless and not even one wise and experienced human being has spent any time figuring out what categories the image should really be in. Human uploaded images are much more likely to have been wisely categorized.
No, simply copying over the categories from the human uploaded image, to robot uploaded image, prior to deleting it, is not equivalent to copying the possibly superior robot uploaded image over the human uploaded image, because deleting the human uploaded image deletes its revision history. That revision history may have recorded a useful discussion over which categories the image belonged in. And you lose that when you show preference to the robot image.
"Those who can't remember history are doomed to repeat it." The political scientist who said this was referring to political history. But the aphorism applies equally to revision history. By deleting the history of the human uploaded image you curse us into repeating discussion encoded in the edit summaries of the deleted image's revision history and talk page.
Not all images have interesting revision histories, but, for those that do, I suggest your practice is actually hightly disruptive, due to the potential duplication of effort you curse us to. And I encourage you to reconsider your approach.
I think you will agree, if it you give this issue any serious thought, that having millions of potentially useful images is not what makes the wikimedia commons useful. Rather, what makes it useful, is the tools we provide that help potential users find the images they might find useful. The uploading, whether by human or robot, is only the first step, and not the most important part. Wise and intelligent classification is far more important. Sorry, but your current approach undermines that effort. Geo Swan (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

File:French Marines Afghanistan.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:French Marines Afghanistan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Officer (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Jericho 941 FSL.jpg

Keine Ahnung was dich geritten hat sie wiederherzustellen, aber löschst du dann bitte wieder die Datei File:Jericho 941 FSL.jpg?--D.W. (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Och nee das Kolaorka der das hochgeladen hat... Wenn er es denn irgend wann mal verstanden hätte wie das OTRS geht dann könnten wir die ganzen pics auch behalten. Ne aber was mich da zu bewogen hat das ding wieder her zu stellen war der Löschgrund der davon ausgieng das dies eine völlig unsinnige page ist was es nicht war, weil sie kurz vor her vandaliert wurde. Ich werde ein DR stellen.--Sanandros (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:SIG-SAUER PPNL.jpg

This file is available under the CC0 license and was marked as such, so I think there is no need for deletion.--Francis Flinch (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

justed turned the no licence template into a DR.--Sanandros (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Irish soldier with Steyr AUG.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Irish soldier with Steyr AUG.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

File:GEPM1.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:GEPM1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File:BT MP9 with magazines.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BT MP9 with magazines.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Masur (talk) 19:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Item "Doha" auf Wikidata

Hallo Sanadros, hast Du diese Edits am Item über die Hauptstadt Katars auf Wikidata gemacht? Falls ja, dann würde es mich mal brennend interessieren, was zum Geier das soll.--Kompakt (talk) 12:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Ganz einfach manche Artikel beschreiben die Gemeinde Doha, manche den Ort Doha, manche beides. In der Gemeinde Doha gibt es neben dem Ort Doha noch andere Orte. Ansonsten hättet ihr ja nicht eine Liste von Städten die deutlich länger ist als die Anzahl der Gemeinden in Katar.--Sanandros (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Du bist da völlig auf dem falschen Dampfer, sorry. Der englische Artikel, den Du drin gelassen hast, beschreibt in erster Linie und hauptsächlich die Hauptstadt Katars; gerade wie der deutsche Artikel, den Du rausgenommen hast. Im englischen wird zwar in einem kurzen Abschnitt noch die Gemeinde abgehandelt, trotzdem ist es falsch, das aufzutrennen - und dann noch den englischen Artikel unter der Beschreibung "Gemeinde in Katar" zu führen! Das muss Dir doch einleuchten.
Stattdessen würde man für die Gemeinde ein Item erstellen, und dort alle Gemeinde-Artikel (und zwar nur die, die ausschließlich die Gemeinde abhandeln!) verlinken. Dort könnte man den englischen Redir auf die Gemeinde, en:Ad Dawhah, einbringen, aber natürlich nicht den Artikel selbst, der sich zu 95% um die Hauptstadt dreht.--Kompakt (talk) 07:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Ich habe mich da vorallem auf die Einleitung bezogen und die Kategorien bezogen. Im Engnlischen Artikel ist z.B. die Bevölkerungszahl wohl auf die Gemeinde bezogen und solche Fakten waren für mich entscheidend. Viele andere sachen die nicht direkt Messbar sind und keine deutliche unterschiede zwischen Gemeinde und Ort aufweisen habe ich bei meiner Betrachtung aussen vor gelassen.--Sanandros (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, gut, ich verstehe jetzt, was Du machen wolltest. Es kommt immer wieder vor, dass Sachverhalte in einem Wiki in einem einzigen Artikel behandelt werden, wofür es in einem anderen mehrere gibt, oder nur einen Einzelaspekt abhandelt wird. Letztendlich muss man da eine Abwägung treffen, und die Artikel, die inhaltlich die größten Übereinstimmungen haben (bzw. die offensichtlich dasselbe Hauptthema haben), beisammen lassen. Dabei muss man auch bedenken, dass die Interwikis zerschossen werden, wenn man sie trennt - der Leser kann also nicht mehr, wie zuvor, unkompliziert auf einen anderssprachigen Artikel zugreifen. Trennen sollte man sie nur, wenn es sauber möglich ist, also die Artikel komplett bzw. zum allergrößten Teil unterschiedliche Themen behandeln. Ansonsten hat man mehrere Items, deren verlinkte Wiki-Artikel sich thematisch alle größtenteils überdecken, und nur an verschiedenen Items hängen, weil man sich auf einen Einzelaspekt innerhalb der Artikel konzentriert hat.
Bezogen auf "Doha" ist es also durchaus sinnvoll und richtig, dass es für die Gemeinde und die Stadt zwei verschiedene Items in Wikidata gibt. Nur sollte man nicht bei den Interwikis die Artikel, die offensichtlich das Hauptthema "Doha als Hauptstadt Katars" haben, relativ willkürlich der Gemeinde zuschlagen. Das hilft dann wirklich niemandem etwas. Welcher Wert für die Bevölkerungszahl in der Infobox angezeigt wird - derjenige der Gemeinde, der Stadt, oder beide -, muss dann im lokalen Wiki entschieden werden, sobald es mal soweit ist.--Kompakt (talk) 08:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Dann mach es halt rückgängig, ich persönlich finde zwar immer noch dass wir genau definitionen haben sollten aber da werden sich wohl zahlreiche andere Wikis weigern.--Sanandros (talk) 08:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Deine Uploads mit Template:PD-Switzerland-photo

Hallo Sanandros,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du eine Menge Fotos mit {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} als einzigem Lizenz-Tag hochgeladen hast. Das mag für die Schweiz ausreichend sein, aber auf Commons gilt die Regel, dass auch der Copyright-Status in den USA berücksichtigt werden muss (vgl. Commons:PD#Material_in_the_public_domain). In der Hoffnung irgendwas übersehen zu haben, habe ich erstmal keine Löschanträge gestellt, sondern hier um weiteren Input gebeten – wäre nett wenn du da mal vorbeischauen könntest. Grüße, --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Control copyright icon.svg The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
Thanks for reminding me of the issue. Has been resolved (I HOPE) by referal to OTRS Mvanco (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much sorry that I answer so late but I had lots of stuff to do in my other life.--Sanandros (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

regarding diff Thank ya, I just looked up "Joint Special Operations Command" in hotcat and saw it wasn't there. I didn't think to add "United States" to it since there's nothing else named Joint Special Operations Command. Thanks for correcting that. Dainomite (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

No Problem--Sanandros (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Zurmat district

Hallo!

Bitte besser aufpassen: Bilder nicht in eine Kategorie einfügen, die nur ein Redirect auf eine andere Kategorie darstellt. Danke im voraus. --High Contrast (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Ich kategoriesiere die Zuerst und dann habe ich den redirect gesetzt, wenn er schon gewesen wäre dann hätte wohl cat a lot das automatisch gemacht.--Sanandros (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)