User talk:Kelson

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.


It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 16:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Photo avec bordure et information meta

Salut !

Je suis partout ... le titre est de sinistre mémoire, mais j'essaie !

D'habitude je télécharge des photos sans marges. Celles-ci sont un peu particulières, il se trouve que je participe à beaucoup de concours photo, en particulier dans les domaines liés à la nature, et les images encadrées sont connues hors de WP ou WL. L'araignée dans le gazania, par exemple, a collectionné pas mal de prix au niveau national et au niveau international et elle figure dans divers ouvrages et sur des sites Internet. Naturellement si l'on trouve que le cadre est gênant je l'enlèverai.

Ceci dit, tu l'auras sans doute compris, j'essaie de ne fournir que des documents d'une qualité irréprochable.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques

Désolé pour la collision historique, je n'avais même pas réalisé,... un peu trop jeune, un peu trop con.. peut-être ;-). Pour les bordures, oui, c'est inutile... et puis l'on voit moins bien finalement le coeur de la photo, ce qui est vraiment dommage dans ton cas. Encore bravo. Kelson 09:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Category:People

stp, dis-moi, poukoi tu as donné (par exxample) Jules Favre à la categorie People? Schaengel89 @me 08:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tout simplement parceque j'ai parceque c'est la seule que je connaisse par coeur pour les personnes ; et que je trouve les catégories pas terribles et en anglais... ;-) Kelson 13:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Mais pour la future, donne tes noveuaux articles dans autre categories, d'accord? Schaengel89 @me 17:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oui. Kelson 19:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jose Maria Heredia.jpg

Hello, Kelson;

C'est pas possible pour supprimer cette image pourqoui il y'a sur les autre projêts (en:, et autres.) S'il vous plait, expliquez en français pourquoi vous souhaitez qu'il ait enlevé. Merci. Bas parler voir 00:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

 :Bonjour, ce n'est pas le bon (le célèbre) Jose Maria Heredia. Kelson 20:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nico.JPG

Hi, you nominated this photo for deletion but did not give a reason, why? Thuresson 22:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

ok, done. Kelson 11:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Jeremy bentham.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
Ce média risque d'être supprimé.

Merci d'avoir téléchargé Image:Jeremy bentham.jpg. Je remarque que la page « image » n'indique pas à l'heure actuelle qui a créé le contenu, donc son statut eu égard aux droits d'auteurs n'est pas clair. Si vous n'avez pas créé ce contenu vous-même, vous devez indiquer les arguments qui expliquent pourquoi l'utilisation sur Wikimedia Commons est licite (voir ci-dessous). Si vous n'avez pas créé le média vous-même, vous devez aussi spécifier où vous l'avez trouvé, par exemple il s'agira bien souvent du site internet d'où vous l'avez prélevé, et les conditions d'utilisation qui sont indiquées sur ce site.

Si le média n'a pas non plus de message indiquant sa licence, vous devez en ajouter un. Si vous avez vous-même pris la photo, enregistré le contenu sonore, le contenu vidéo, vous pouvez utiliser {{GFDL-self}} pour le distribuer sous licence GFDL. Voyez Commons:Messages de statut des images pour consulter la liste complète des messages de statut juridique que vous pouvez utiliser.

Veuillez noter que tout contenu non sourcé et non accompagné de message de statut juridique sera supprimé une semaine après leur téléchargement, comme indiqué dans le Guide de suppression. Si vous avez téléchargé d'autres médias, veuillez vérifier que vous avez pour chacun d'eux spécifié la source et le statut juridique. Vous pouvez retrouver tous vos téléchargements en utilisant cet outil. Merci.
AlNo (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Marieantoinette.jpg listed for deletion

[edit] Image:Marieantoinette.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Marieantoinette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

howcheng {chat} 17:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tag integration

Hello. You've been around a lot longer than I, but I reverted your change to Image:Sitta europaea wildlife 3.jpg anyway. The discussion at Template talk:Information#Copyright tags in permission field suggests that copyright templates should not be included in the {{Information}} template. I think it's rather important for us to use a standard layout on description pages, especially on featured file or files of the day. What do you think? ~MDD4696 17:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your created gallery pages

Thanks for creating so many gallery pages of people. Please, categorize this pages, it will help other users to find them. Thank you. --GeorgHH 20:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Category:Dirk Bach

Les fichiers média sont classés sur la base de leur catégorisation, et celle-ci ne dépend aucunement de l'usage plus ou moins important des fichiers. L'ensemble des catégories d'un même fichier font partie des propriétés de ce fichier et ne doit pas être altéré, sauf s'il est initialement inadéquat, ou dans le cadre de l'évolution normale du système de classement.

Par exemple: DirkvdM irazu 4.jpg Je vais prochainement ajouter la catégorie Category:Irazú Volcano à cette image, ce qui permettra de supprimer les catégories Category:Costa Rica et Category:Volcanoes.

La préservation des catégories d'un fichier (même quand utilisé dans une gallerie) est la politique actuelle de Commons. --Juiced lemon 08:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

C'est marqué où qu'il faut créer une catégorie pour chaque personne en double de sa page dédiée ? Kelson 08:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Les pages dédiées sont les catégories en anglais. Les autres pages sont pour la plupart inutiles, en particulier les articles qui ne comportent qu'un faible nombre d'images ni classées, ni commentées avec un titre qui peut être dans n'importe quelle langue, ceci comprenant les langues n'utilisant pas de caractères latins. La préservation de la catégorisation des fichiers a fait l'objet de discussions récentes dans Village pump. --Juiced lemon 08:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
L'existence d'un article ET d'une catégorie sur le même sujet n'est jamais dommageable. Contrairement à l'article, la catégorie est indispensable : cela ne me dérangerait aucunement si Иосиф Виссарионович Сталин était supprimé ; par contre, nous avons besoin de Category:Stalin (actuellement mal nommée).
L'expérience montre également que les téléchargeurs d'images ont beaucoup de mal à classer correctement leurs images, tout particulièrement lorsque les catégories appropriées n'existent pas.
La catégorisation d'un article n'est pas en double de celle de sa catégorie, puisque l'article doit se rattacher à cette catégorie et ne doit pas comporter d'autre catégorisation. --Juiced lemon 09:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
L'existence d'un article ET d'une catégorie sur le même sujet n'est jamais dommageable. Contrairement à l'article, la catégorie est indispensable : argumente ?! La redondance est le souvent dommageable, nies-tu cela ? n'importe qu'elle tâche d'organisation cherche à tuer la redondance. Pourquoi la catégorie est indispensable ? Ne parlons pas des noms russes, c'est un tout autre problème, c'est clair que l'article/catégorie doit s'appeller "stalin" ; mais je vois pas le rapport avec notre problème. Revient please à Dirk Bach et explique moi pourquoi ce que tu veux faire est mieux. où sont les avantages. Kelson 09:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas une redondance, car articles et catégories ont des caractéristiques techniques différentes et leur utilité n'est pas vraiment comparable. La catégorie est supérieure à l'article puisqu'elle possède des caractéristiques supplémentaires, au seul désavantage de ne pas conserver l'historique en cas de renommage.
Et quoi concrètement comme caractéristique supplémentaire dans pour notre exemple ?
La catégorie est nécessaire à la gestion car elle permet de comptabiliser les fichiers média pour un même critère de classement (la catégorie). L'examen visuel de la page de catégorie permet de détecter les erreurs de classement, sauf lorsque le nombre de fichiers média est trop élevé. Par exemple, la catégorie Category:Volcanoes contient environ 200 images, ce qui est jugé excessif par la plupart des utilisateurs ; dans un tel cas, il est donc nécessaire de recatégoriser les images vers des catégories plus précises. Ce travail ordinaire de gestion serait devenu pratiquement irréalisable si ces images avaient été retirées de leur catégorie parce que présentes dans une ou plusieurs galleries.
Honmêtement savoir que l'on a 200 images de Volcans, ont s'en fout ; je peut d'ailleurs te rétorquer que tu ne sais pas combien de volcans différents sont représentés..... ce qui au font n'est pas important non plus. Je ne vois pas en quoi recategoriser 100 articles (avec 2 images par article) est plus difficile que de recategoriser 200 images... il faut que tu m'expliques. Je ne souhaite pas supprimer toutes les catégories si une image est dans une gallerie, je souhaite supprimer la catégorie correspondante à l'article dans lequel l'image est introduite dans le cas où l'article lui-même est dans la catégorie (redondance).
Il faut noter que la perte de la catégorisation d'un fichier média met fin au suivi de ce fichier. En cas d'erreur, ou si le fichier est ultérieurement supprimé de la gallerie où il se trouvait, celui-ci est perdu dans la base de données. Si le fichier n'a plus de catégories, il revient encombrer la liste des fichiers non catégorisés, jusqu'à ce qu'un utilisateur courageux vienne le remettre dans le circuit.
Mais pourquoi on le virerai l'image de Bach de la gallerie ? exactement pour les même raisons que on le virerait de sa catégorie ? C'est exactement pareil... et puis les images sont pas perdus, il a un moteur de recherche qui travaille sur la description de l'image... je comprends rien. Moi quand je cherche, j'utilise le moteur de recherche, c'est un click et plus rapide que de se promener dans les catégories. Tu crois honnêtement que les gens se baladent dans les catégories pour trouver un truc ? Ils tape se qu'ils recherchent dans la searchbox et si ils ont de la chance tombent sur la page.
De plus, pour le cas particulier des personnes, il faut rappeler que tous les noms doivent normalement être indexés dans Category:People by alphabet. Cette catégorie comporte deux listes séparées : celles des articles, et celles des sous-catégories. Étant donné que l'unicité de la langue est garantie pour les seules catégories (un article pouvant être rédigé dans n'importe quelle langue : voir ประเทศโปแลนด์ et deviner le sujet de l'article), il semblerait logique de fondre les deux listes pour n'avoir que des sous-catégories. En pratique, cela consiste à créer systématiquement une catégorie pour une personne, et à ne catégoriser que cette catégorie en fonction des données concernant la personne (dates, occupation, nationalité, etc.). Si un article existe pour cette même personne, il doit être rattaché à la catégorie correspondante, et à aucune autre. --Juiced lemon 19:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
En quoi l'unicité de la langue est garantie pour les seules catégories ? Je peux tout à fait faire des catégories en russe. Kelson 20:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
La règle est que les catégories sont en anglais. Je compte la faire respecter (avec l'aide des administrateurs et autres utilisateurs), ce qui n'est pas tout à fait le cas actuellement. Ce qui signifie que si tu crées des catégories en russe, elles devraient être supprimées. Du moins, tant qu'un espace spécial n'aura pas été prévu pour des catégories en russe. --Juiced lemon 20:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Je ne suis pas convaincu, la pluspart des arguments donnés ne tiennent pas comme :

  • c'est une règle défini : tu ne m'a pas montré où c´est marqué - au contaire j'ai trouvé un passage ou c'est écrit que chacun fait comme il veut.
  • un poblème de langue : il n'y a aucun problème particulier aux gallery, juste que tu surveilles le cas sur les category
  • la recategorisation serait plus compliquée - alors que au contraire ayant plusieurs images par article, cela devrait aller plus vite.
  • la catégorie garantierai de ne pas perdre une image : comme ci c'était plus difficile de virer une catégorie d'une image, que une image d'une gallery
  • la catégorie est indispensable pour localiser une image : personne ne cherche une image par les catégorie, mais par le moteur de recherche. Si cela n'était pas le cas, cela ferait longtemps que yahoo serait le maitre de la recherche sur le web, et pas google.

D'un autre coté les avantages des galleries sont nombreux et connu, cf la page de vote.

Pour toutes ces raisons, je continuerai de virer les catégories qui me sembleront représenter un doublon. Kelson 21:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Palestrina.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Palestrina.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] languages for categories?

hello there, you had a question once on the usage of local language over English in categories. I have started a discussion page on this topic, maybe you want to drop by and give your thoughts? Commons:Language for categories. sincerely Gryffindor 12:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Salut Emmanuel :-)

Je viens de trouver cette image, qui est manifestement un copyvio (le site source est affublé d'un gros copyright et ne cite pas lui-même ses sources et surtout, je doute que cette photo soit dans le domaine public). Si tu as plus d'infos, merci de rajouter, sinon merci d'apposer le tag {{delete}} afin qu'on puisse faire le ménage. A+ ! notafish }<';> 09:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Salut Delphine. L'illustration vient de "Bourgogne", ouvrage collectif, éditeur MSM à Vic en Bigorre. Je n'ai toujours pas la certitude que c'est dans le PD, mais au-moins, on a une ref ;-). Kelson 08:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Galleries

Hello Kelson, when creating a gallery (e.g. Bung Hatta or Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès), please add it to appropriate categories. It will help to find the galleries. Thank you. --GeorgHH 21:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Georg, That is the second time you warn ne on this topic. After the last warning, I had have made efforts to do it correctly but relatively fast have had a conflict with an other contributor. In fact, I feel the category politics inadapted, incomplete. My opinion is that categories not very essential are : I never use them for example. So, I have decided not doing anything with categories, to keep my tranquility. Kelson 09:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Bonjour Kelson,
Il ne faut pas croire que "catégoriser" soit compliqué. Voici comment je travaille : trouve par exemple l'article correspondant aux oiseaux Ailuroedus sur wikipedia francophone (dans Google, tape : site:wikipedia.org Ailuroedus crassirostris).
Ensuite, tu regardes comment le contributeur a listé cet article qui dépend de la famille des Ptilonorhynchidae : c'est sous la [[Category:Ptilonorhynchidae]]. Donc il n'y a plus qu'à copier et coller la catégorie dans la page de wikicommons.
Il se peut que cette catégorie apparaisse en rouge après sauvegarde de la page. Donc rebelote : tu remonte d'u cran dans wikipedia et tu regardes la catégorie... que tu recopies/colles dans wikicommons et ainsi de suite.
Bon courage. N'hésite pas à poser des questions dans le bistro pour que les réponses soient profitables aux autres.--Patricia.fidi 13:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Claude Lévi-Strauss

Alors, cher ami, il est très utile signer ses interventions dans Wikipedia. D'accord? Franchement parler je ne me rapelle plus de l'histoir de cet image, donc le sujet était Claude Lévi-Strauss. Il faut l'enlever, c'est si simple, et dommage fait pour Wikipedia, c'est nul! --Alexius Manfelt 10:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] about Liv tyler

Hi, I notice to had submitted liv tyler image [[1]] for delete, but as you can see the image is under CC license at flicker site. Why do you think there is a problem? Assafn 14:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

We don't have more informations about the photo. : the date, the location. Liv Tyler has a costume like in LOTR. I think this picture is extracted from a DVD or something like that. Another point : the quality is very good, but the other pictures of this guy are (bad) tourist pictures... He has no idea about the copyirght laws IMHO, that's the reason he has put CC as license. Kelson 14:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Jakob henle.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jakob henle.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

Same for Image:Mueller.Joh..jpg --|EPO| 12:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Please note that stating Wikipedia as the source is not good enough. It must be stated where the image origins from so it's copyright status can be verified. If you are unable to provide source then you should not upload. --|EPO| 13:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] problème de license

merci, j'y travail en ce moment car des utilisateurs sur wikipédia France me l'ont déjà fait remarquer. Nous essayons de trouver une solution --Jmr 22:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Ac papyrus.png

Pay attention to copyright Image:Ac papyrus.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

gildemax 16:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove such warnings from the image pages. If you disagree use the talk page or contact the user who tagged it. Removing such tags without any discussion is considered vandalism and will get you blocked pretty fast! --|EPO| 13:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Versac

The contents on http://vanb.typepad.com/versac/ is not released under GFDL. It is released under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 France License. As Commons requires images to be used commercially and modified this license is not allowed on Commons.

Due to the above I will not delete these images and review all your other uploads. If I find more copyright violations I will delete them immediately.

Read the rules very carefully or you wil be blocked! --|EPO| 13:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

oups, it will add the OTRS permission. Kelson 13:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:James Dean stamp.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:James Dean stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Davepape 03:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sarkozy

Merci :) Effectivement, 70mm c'est court, d'ailleurs j'ai acheté aujourd'hui un 70-300 qui, je l'espère, me facilitera la vie :) guillom 11:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Tim berners-lee.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Tim berners-lee.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Note the Flickr licence allows non commercial use only. Adambro 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Avrillavignex.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Avrillavignex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Cary Bass demandez 13:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Old map-Flatonia-1881.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Old map-Flatonia-1881.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

(An old request you made) --Deadstar 10:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:P agriculture.png

I have restored the older version, but this one does neither specify a source. I have therefore tagged it {{nsd}}, and it will be deleted if no source can be found within 7 days. In case you want to change the picture to another picture that is sourced and freely licensed, please do so, and leave me a note so that I can delete the old versions. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

(fixed your request) --Deadstar 08:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Larry wall.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Larry wall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 14:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Zürich-drapeau.svg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zürich-drapeau.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 15:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gorky image

I notice you uploaded Image:Maxim Gorky authographed portrait 1.jpg, using a tag that implies you are/were the copyright holder of the image. Given its age, I'm assuming that's not correct, though I'd hate to see such a nice image of Gorky deleted, so I'm not going to list it anywhere - but please update the tag so that nobody else gets it into their head to try and delete it. Sherurcij 04:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, that is a corrected mistake from me. Best regards Kelson 09:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Attention...

Salut, fait attention à ne pas supprimer les interliens, c.f. ce diff. Kelson 07:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Salut, en fait, c'est presque normal :p
Je bosse actuellement sur les hommes politiques français (je refais les gallery et j'organise les cat) et j'avais viré l'interwiki (en fait, il y a 4...) pensant ajouter le sommaire après avec Sumitup mais hier le toolserver était (encore) cassé... donc j'ai reporté l'opération de quelques heures...
Je corrige tout de suite vu que le tool server est réparé... À plus--Bapti


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Tombeau_de_Bruckner.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tombeau_de_Bruckner.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 17:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Kiki Daire

Image deletion warning Kiki Daire has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--← Körnerbrötchen <✉> 13:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:LL_20021213.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LL_20021213.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. BLueFiSH 18:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:AndréChénier.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AndréChénier.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Anne_de_Montmorency.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_de_Montmorency.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Familistère-guise.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Familistère-guise.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Napoleon-3.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Napoleon-3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 16:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Alexandre_Dumas.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandre_Dumas.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jacques Barrot

Image deletion warning Jacques Barrot has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--86.94.202.45 11:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Muhammad_3.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Muhammad_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

193.188.115.248 17:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Parus ater cropped.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parus ater cropped.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 85.167.229.176 21:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Parus_ater_cropped.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parus_ater_cropped.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 13:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Baden-powell1.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Baden-powell1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Geraki TLG 11:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Raven-and-the-first-men.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Raven-and-the-first-men.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Falco columbarius

In september 2005 you uploaded Image:Falco columbarius.jpg. Ou avez-vous trouvé cet image? Je ne peux pas le retrouver dans "The birds of Europe" de John Gould. Si vous voulez me repondre, je vous remercie beaucoup! (...and I hope you understand my French...)

Regards, Maarten Sepp 11:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

e-mail: maarten.sepp@yahoo.com

Hi Marteen... I only trust the website oiseaux.net. The bibliographic note was added afterward by someone else [2]. So it seems to be a small mystery ! Kelson 08:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation! Maarten Sepp

Exusez moi!
I "bad-named" your image "Pernis apivorus by John Gould improved.jpg", my mistake, considered the two images identical as the source-image is the same. No, I shall not do it again!

Kind regards, Maarten Sepp 16:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Cecil 14:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Josef Pröll

Image deletion warning Josef Pröll has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

(Sorry, I do not see any use in such "gallery") --WeHaWoe 18:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Kindly stop removing the deletion notice from this gallery; doing so won't stop the deletion process, and will only make the gallery more likely to be deleted. Your "reason" for the latest removal, that the rest of us "are not allowed to ask for remove" of your files, is sheer wishful thinking; if it were true, there wouldn't be a deletion process (or the tags for it) in the first place.

It is you who are not allowed to remove the deletion tag (that will be done when the debate is closed), not us who are not allowed to apply it. -- Korax1214 00:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Once again you try to sabotage the deletion process for this gallery by removing the tag (what part of "Do not remove this tag until the deletion request is closed" are you having so much trouble understanding?), and since such a change is forbidden by Wikimedia policy, it is clearly not a "minor" change as you mislabel it every time you make it.

If you want this gallery not to be deleted, you need to go about this properly, the Wikimedia way, by joining in the debate and giving us good reason(s) why this gallery should not be deleted; "I will not accept the suppression[sic] of this gallery" (in more neutral language, "I don't want it deleted") isn't a reason, much less a good one. At least one other user disagrees with your assertion that "Currently, this gallery, is the best way to browse images of Josef Pröll" (hence the deletion debate); this assertion could I suppose be a good reason, but your behavior is undermining this stance by giving a bad impression.

And apart from your part of it, the deletion debate is proceeding in the proper Wikimedia manner (or "based on a rule elaborated by the community" to use your own phrase).

I think you should spend a bit of time studying Commons' policies, and the pages detailing what it is and is not. -- Korax1214 07:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, as long as your deletion request is not based on a concrete policy, I do not have to discuss anything. If your decision is based on one please give me a link to this policy and I will accept the fact that there is something to discuss, otherone I wont discuss, I have created hundreds of gallery based on the policies (it is allowed), I will not start to discuss the deletion of them only because someone, with an opinion based on nothing (no policy), ask for removing pages. I keep the your banner, but please give me on which policy your opinion is based. RegardsKelson 09:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:300px-Antonio_Meucci.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:300px-Antonio_Meucci.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 03:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted page

I have restored this. Please note that removal of any deletion tag is incorrect as I feel you must know - I believe you are an experienced Wikipedian. I trust you will not do that again --Herby talk thyme 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[3] c'est bien, merci.
Maintenant, exercice suivant: traduire en français la mention This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive qui figure en haut du cadre bleu. Rama 12:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Je sais pas si je suis le mieux placé pour cela, en tout cas, merci pour ton aide. Kelson 15:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Antoine_de_Jomini.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antoine_de_Jomini.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 07:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Coucou

Salut Kelson, j'ai vu que tu avais déjà importé 2 photo :) Juste n'oublies pas de me citer comme auteur de la photo, c'est tout ce que je demande... Si quelqu'un te demande si tu as le droit d'importer ces photos en mon nom, bien sûr que oui : "Me, Guérin Nicolas, allow Kelson to upload pictures that i took in the Zürich's Zoo on 26 june 2008 under free licences compatible Commons". Je ne sais pas si cela servira à quelque chose, mais comme je serais surement peu présent la semaine prochaine, on ne sait jamais. Bon week-end. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 09:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Salut Nico... oui, comme tu as vu je l'avais fait. Bonne vacances. Kelson (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Prionus_coriarius.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prionus_coriarius.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ahonc (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Wilhelm ostwald.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilhelm ostwald.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 09:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:AntonBruckner.jpeg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AntonBruckner.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 20:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


[edit] File:RichardFrancisBurton.jpeg

File deletion warning File:RichardFrancisBurton.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

NPG (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Hello Kelson!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Commons images are used by editors on many projects in many languages. Each image is put into categories. This helps other editors find them. Please add categories to each image you upload.

To add an image to a category, add the following code to the end of the page.

[[Category:Category Name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbit of comets, add the following to the image description page:

[[Category:Astronomy diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories: Astronomy diagrams, Comets.

For further information on categories read Commons:Categories.

The CommonSense Tool often helps you find the best category for your image.

Here is a gallery of your images. Please check that each image has a category. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the help desk. Thank you.

BotMultichillT 17:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kelson"