User talk:Cezarika1/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Cezarika1!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Display problem

Hello, some large pictures are not handled very well by some web browsers. For example, I use Firefox 3 and I can't see the image either, but generally they look fine once used in articles or if you click on them to see the full-size version. Cordially, Alchemica (talk) 11:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

It seems there are a few problems with the servers today, many images don't work as they should - so we just have to wait a bit, hoping it will get better in the next few hours. And you can sign by typing ~~~~. Cordially, Alchemica (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Err, I don't know, we certainly don't have the same keyboards. On my french keyboard it's [Alt GR] + [é]. Another tip. If you hit the following keys one after another, [t] [h] [a] [n] [k] [Space] [y] [o] [u], you'll say thank you to me for answering your questions. Alchemica (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not a machine. The basics when it comes to asking for help is to say "please" and "thank you". Try it with other human beings, sometimes. If my other answers didn't match your expectations, I'd still go away with the pleasure of having taught you something usefull today. Alchemica (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate that you took a bit of your time to leave me a message of explanation. No, I'm not angry and yes, I could have avoided being sarcastic, too. I didn't mean to be rude and if I was, I regret it. I didn't mean to compare you to an idiot, but only to point out somehting with a bit of humour. Anyway, I should know that we don't all have the same sense of humour - it really depends upon your country and culture, and what would be just fine with some people might hurt others. I should have thought about this before answering your last question, so, sorry again. Be sure that you still can ask me for informations if you need some - I'll answer if I can, for me this little incident is forgotten. Cordially, Alchemica (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


  • Now the images are ok, so they won't be deleted.
  • To understand how to sign, read this guideline.
  • For the duplicates, I've deleted them. Sorry but there aren't so many active administrators here, they don't pay us :-)

Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 09:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I was on holiday, do you still need the category-move? --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 10:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Usually the error is displayed but you can continue and overwrite it.. can't you? --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 16:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Comment

I didn't place a deletion request here I never even saw this request until today. I don't see any problem with the image. But if you have a question, you should ask Admin Abigor in Holland. He can answer your questions and maybe remove the incomplete DR template on that image. I am not an Admin here, only a trusted user who can mark flickr images. PS: If I order a deletion request, I always give a reason. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


Hello, Cezarika1. You have new messages at Abigor's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Seems that you have found out how to fix it on your own.. :) Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 13:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

File:IBiserica Sfântul Nicolae din Suceava12.jpg

Wrong name? Look here: Commons:FAQ, 3 Technical questions, # 3.4 How can I rename/move an image or other media file?
Good luck. --El-Bardo (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Portrait of Sofronie Miclescu.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted! Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 14:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, PD-old is the right one (since the artist died 102 years ago!) - MPF (talk) 15:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes, because the art is a two-dimensional image. If it had been a three-dimensional work (e.g. a sculpture), then who took the photograph is important, because there is creative work involved (choice of the best angle to take the photo from). But with a straight-on photo of a flat object, no significant creative effort has been used, so the only copyright that matters is that of the original artist. It is all explained (somewhere!) on the copyrights page. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
For things where the author is not known, it is safest to assume it is copyright and can't be uploaded, unless you know for certain that it is very old (anything done in the 19th century or earlier, the author is highly likely to have been dead more than 70 years) - MPF (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
As MPF worte you chose the best license, sorry but I was far from the screen for some minutes before reading your message :) --Vituzzu (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Photo

Hi. Tell me if the image of mortuary photo (on the cross) can be uploaded on Commons. The cemetery is a public place. Cezarika1 (talk) 10:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

What country was the photograph taken in, and how old is the building/structure depicted in the photo? Stifle (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
The photo is on the cross. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Partenie_Ciopron2.jpg The country is Romania amnt the year of death is 1980. Cezarika1 (talk) 10:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Sadly, we can't use that image at all because Romanian law (section 33 (1)(h) of the law of Copyright of 1996) requires us to have the permission of the person who created the headstone/monument as well as that of the photographer (see COM:FOP). The mortuary photograph itself is not a problem (see COM:DM). Stifle (talk) 10:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I was just about to add the same! - MPF (talk) 10:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the mortuary photo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Partenie_Ciopron.jpg. I am the photographer. What's the problem. I don't understand the reason of deletion. And the mortuary photo can be uploaded here, I understand from your answer. Cezarika1 (talk) 10:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Did you take the original mortuary photograph or just the copy at File:Partenie Ciopron.jpg? We can't use the image of the gravestone because it is a violation of Romanian law. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
File:HoreaGorunulTebea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Leoboudv (talk) 02:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Image deleted

Hi Cezarika. I'm sorry, I don't think you can see images that were deleted. Still, you might want to check this out with the admins - I am not one of them. Maybe if you try to contact the one that deleted the image? Cheers --Santosga (talk) 05:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphaea on the lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphaea on the lake2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Jafeluv 21:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pagina.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Justass (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biserica Mănăstirii Frumoasa5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statuia lui Dosoftei din Iaşi2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments okay, please add coordinates --Carschten 16:33, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

File renaming

I noticed you started a deletion request on File:Iosif Fazekas.jpg, which you uploaded yourself, telling that it had a wrong name. That system is for deleting files that may not be free or within the project's scope, renaming a file is a lot easier. Simply type {{rename|the new name you want for the file}} and an admin will rename it. But in this case, now that we are at it, simply tell me which name would you like, and will move the file. Belgrano (talk) 02:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Biserica de lemn din Radaseni9.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Biserica de lemn din Radaseni9.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Biserica de lemn din Radaseni9.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ferbr1 (talk) 05:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Your deletion nominations

Please review COM:FOP before nominating random images for deletion. There are countries where Buildings and/or statues located in public places are not protected by copyright, i.e Spain or Germany. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama

You nominated a lot of images for deletion from countries that have freedom of panorama, but freedom of panorama means that statues, buildings, monuments, and other things found in public places may be photographed freely, without violating any copyright. COM:FOP is a very useful resource for this, because it tells you what countries are worrisome. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Not for those countries in which its explicitly stated as such, which are the ones stated as good there. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mănăstirea Popăuţi4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 08:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


Please give images good descriptions

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Mănăstirea Popăuţi5.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mănăstirea Popăuţi5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please add a description and geocode to the image. --Iotatau 21:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 SupportSharp image of a building. Already has a description. --Nevit 09:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Birlic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ionutzmovie (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Cezarika1, Please elaborate here. A wrong name is not a valid deletion reason. If you want the file to be renamed put a {{Rename}} on it. if you manually re-uploaded it under the correct name use {{Bad name}}, or if you found a duplicate by someone else use {{Duplicate}}. –Krinkletalk 01:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Badeuti

Salut Cezar, Am vazut ca ai postat o imagine cu Biserica "Sf. Apostoli Petru şi Pavel" din Bădeuţi (1935), fostă biserică evanghelică. Eu lucrez in prezent la o harta etnica a Bucovinei pentru anul 1910 si am o problema in a identifica exact localizarea satului Badeuti german. Ai vreo informatie in acest sens sau macar poate stii sa-mi spui unde e biserica respectiva in Badeutii de azi caci ma gandesc ca ar trebui sa fie in centrul vechii comunitati germane? Multumesc.Colinspancev (talk) 11:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Multumesc foarte mult! Logica e impecabila! Eu nici nu mi-am dat seama de existenta acelui indicator care intr-adevar marcheza situarea bisericii in sat.Colinspancev (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Cezarika1,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Bistrița Aurie

Hi Cezarika, would it be possible for you to add a little bit more information about the location where you made pictures like e.g. File:Raul Bistrita Aurie.jpg? Thank you! Fransvannes (talk) 21:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Mulțumesc! Fransvannes (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Zaharesti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

184.65.54.121 13:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Hotel Select in Iaşi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Razvan Socol (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Nominating for deletion

Hello! Should I ask You why have you been nominating almost ten of my pictures for deletion? I don't really understand what are the problems with them. Yes, these are recent buildings, but I don't know about any convention which makes a picture about a recent building banned (yes of course there are exceptions, like the pictures about military objects). And what's the problem with the two grave? --Szabi237 (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Casa Berthelot din Iasi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlevente (talk) 11:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:DanubeLakes Sat1.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DanubeLakes Sat1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:DanubeLakes Sat1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 09:36, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Dărmăneşti.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mănăstirea Dobrovăț10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Files - photos by Донор

Hello. Today you put a mark (nominated for deletion) on my ten photos.

Here they are:

File:Екатерина вторая donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Памятник Ленину в городе Бендеры donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Д.Г.Дьяченко donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Памятник Матери - Мемориал Славы в Тирасполе donor.tiras.biz.jpg

[[:File:Памятник Юрию Гагарину в Тирасполе donor./span>]]) 10:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Памятная доска Старинов И.Г. donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Аронецкая Н.С. памятная табличка на театре donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Памятник защитникам Приднестровья donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Бочковский В.А. памятная доска на доме donor.tiras.biz.jpg

File:Памятник Суворову donor.tiras.biz.JPG

Reason for the nomination: "No FOP in Republic of Moldova."

What does it mean the abbreviation "FOP"?

I do not understand what is it "FOP".

Yours respectfully, Донор 16:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama

PortugalSpainFranceItalySwitzerlandBelgiumNetherlandsUnited_KingdomIrelandLuxembourgGermanyDenmarkNorwayIcelandSwedenFinlandGreeceTurkeyAustriaPolandRussiaRussiaCzech_RepublicSloveniaCroatiaAlbaniaBulgariaSerbiaMontenegroBosnia_and_HerzegovinaHungarySlovakiaRomaniaMoldovaUkraineBelarusLithuaniaLatviaEstoniaRepublic of Macedonia
Freedom of panorama in European countries
 
OK, including public interiors
 
OK
 
OK for buildings only
 
Not OK
 
Public interiors are OK, but schools, opera buildings, entrance halls of businesses, and museums are not public places for the purpose of Dutch law, while railway stations are.
 
Inconclusive or unknown

Hello. Thanks so much for that described in detail what is it "FOP".

I have a few questions for you:

1) what does the law of the Republic of Moldova has to Transnistria? Transnistria and Moldova are two different states. In Transnistria no laws of the Republic of Moldova, in the same way as in Moldova do not have laws Transnistria;

2) You have written: "The basis of Commons is the commercial uses of the images." Excuse me, as I thought Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are free and open source projects.

3) So you can mark brand is all my photos as well as photos of all the other users of Transnistria, Moldova, Ukraine, Russia and other countries. Color states that in the above map red! Now let's say that you can not take pictures: the Kremlin, the Eiffel Tower, the Colosseum, the Parthenon... After all, it's completely absurd. But these countries are also marked in red.

Yours respectfully, Донор 20:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Пам. камінь Айкі БЦ.jpg

Впмм немає чим зайнятись??? Фото памятної стелли належить до порушення панорамної зйомки???? Я автор фото, при чому це єдине фото цієї памятки. Що Ви пропонуєте робити? Тупо видалити і радіти з цього?--AlexusUkr (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for answer you in English. You cannot avoid the removal of that image. The laws in Ukraine are strictly and don't permit the commercial use of an image of a recent artistic work (unless the author died more than 70 years ago). I am sorry for removal, but it's the law of your country. Cezarika1 (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Свободная панорама в ПМР

Уважаемый, коллега! Приглашаю Вас принять участие в обсуждении вопроса свободной панорамы в Приднестровье Commons:Форум#Свободная панорама в ПМР. Потому что Вы удалили очень много фотографий с этой территории, которая не подчиняется законам Республики Молдова. Цитата из закона ПМР об авторском праве: "II. Свободное использование и воспроизведение произведения.Допускается без согласия автора и без выплаты авторского вознаграждения: воспроизведение, передача в эфир или сообщение для всеобщего сведения по кабелю произведений архитектуры, фотографии, изобразительного искусства, которые постоянно расположены в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, когда изображение произведения является основным объектом таких воспроизведений, передачи в эфир или сообщения для всеобщего сведения по кабелю или когда изображение произведения используется для коммерческих целей;"

Public domain According to Transnistrian Government regulation #289 about ratification of Temporary regulations of copyright and allied rights, legal safeguard of software, databases, and integrated circuit topology, dated November 18, 1994, Article 1.6: copyright does not apply to:
  • the objects of the folk art whose authors are unknown
  • laws, court rulings, other official documents
  • official symbols (flags, coats of arms, insignia etc.) that are approved by the state organs and organizations

Comment – The Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic is a self-proclaimed state. While de-facto independent, it is regarded as a part of Moldova by most countries. Nevertheless it is supposed that the author has agreed with the uncopyrightability of this work.


English  русский  +/−

С уважением,--Kodru (talk) 06:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Transnistria is not a country, it'a a territory occupied by a russian army. Cezarika1 (talk) 07:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
У Вас прямо националистические взгляды какие-то. Приднестровье это непризнанное государство, которое существует больше 20 лет. Территорией Молдовы не является и не находится в подчинении РМ.--Kodru (talk) 08:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
The existence de facto of Transnistria doesn't change the situation: no country recognize it. The transnistrian postition is one nationalist. I judge the situation according the laws and not emotionally. USA (on which territory is located Wikimedia Foundation) doesn't recognize the transnistrian laws, so the rules for Transnistria are the rules for the Republic of Moldova. Cezarika1 (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Может США и не признает, но тем не менее считаются с законами ПМР все делегации разных стран, которые приезжают на эту территорию. Также тот шаблон на закон не я делал, но его признает русская Википедия и другие. Пусть государство непризнанное, но живет по законам не Молдовы и не США. На счет того, что законы менять надо, это факт.--Kodru (talk) 09:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

...Dar nu contează, oricum cred că cel care a avut urechi a auzit. :) Apreciez inițiativa ta, poate într-adevăr punerea forțată în aplicare a unor legi stupide va ridica ceva colb, dacă nu în Moldova și România, măcar în statele care se cred mai civilizate (Rassia-matușka). Cu bine! --Gikü (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Dacă democraţia şi civilizaţia ca în Austria şi Germania nu pot fi obţinute prin memorii şi iniţiative către parlamentarii care ar trebui să ne reprezinte interesele ar trebui intervenit prin altfel de mijloace pentru a demonstra că totul e absurd. Dar pentru reuşita demersului este necesară coalizarea a cât mai multor persoane şi din mai multe state. Susţin egalizarea legislaţiei pentru a elimina tot ce este absurd şi poate constitui o frână în cale progresului. Ar trebui stârnită o revoluţie virtuală pentru a obţine ceea ce ar trebui să existe în ţările noastre. Ce spun poate părea utopic, dar nu văd o altă soluţie pentru a combate inerţia şi rigiditatea sistemelor birocratice din ţările noastre. Avem de ales între a trăi într-un sistem dictatorial ca în Rusia lui Putin (importat şi în majoritatea ţărilor din lagărul comunist - mai puţin în ţările baltice) sau într-un sistem civilizat ca în Germania. De noi depinde această schimbare a propriilor noastre ţări. Cezarika1 (talk) 09:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Retragere de pe Wikipedia în română

Noi (utilizatori) de pe Wikipedia în română ne mirăm că dumneavoastră v-ați retras de pe Wikipedia în română.Dacă vreți, puteți să îmi spuneți de ce v-ați retras, însă ați rămas la Wikimedia commons.--Receptie123 (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Corecție: nu noi, dar Receptie123 personal. Cu bine. Gikü (talk)
Și domnul Sîmbotin cu Sigma Phi.--Receptie123 (talk) 05:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

@Giku Nu cred că se va mai întroarce Cezarika1.Receptie123 (talk) 05:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 07:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Ciprian Porumbescu din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Simeon Florea Marian din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Costache Negri din Suceava1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Mihail Kogălniceanu din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Alecu Russo din Suceava1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Petru Rareş din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Mihai Eminescu din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bustul lui Traian Chelariu din Suceava1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Florea2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumentul eroilor din Burdujeni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumentul eroilor din 1917 din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumentul eroilor din Suceava1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumentul eroilor suceveni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Troiţa în memoria luptătorilor anticomunişti din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumentul Unirii din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Monument Zamca.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Oul uriaş din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pictura murală de pe clădirea Liceului Petru Rareş.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pictura murală "Mioriţa".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pictura murală "Primăvara".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pictura murală "Nunta".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pictura murală "Vânătoarea".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Suceava-center.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Grupul statuar Constructorul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Statuia ecvestră a lui Ştefan cel Mare din Suceava.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 12:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate //  Gikü  said  done  Sunday, 5 January 2014 22:59 (UTC) 22:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate russavia ([[User talk:Russavia|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Ping

Salut, când poți - scrie te rog pe giordachi[at]gmail.com. Am ceva să'ți spun ;) //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 22 January 2015 13:16 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 09:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 10:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate //  Gikü  said  done  Wednesday, 23 September 2015 13:47 (UTC) 13:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Repedea Hill

Sistemul a generat automat numele. Mersi, (Rgvis ([[User talk:Rgvis|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC))

Imi pare rau ca sistemul automat nu a generat textul pe care ti-l doreai in mod special. Pentru orice disfunctionalitate sesizata in ceea ce priveste unealta in cauza, rog a te adresa lui Magnus Manske. Multumesc pentru mesaj, Cezarika1. (Rgvis ([[User talk:Rgvis|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC))

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 106.68.123.120 13:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Dear colleague, what's the goal of uploading of 7 specimens of such? Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Simon04 ([[User talk:Simon04|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate Yuriy Kvach ([[User talk:Ykvach|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Template:Autotranslate Themightyquill ([[User talk:Themightyquill|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hungarikusz Firkász ([[User talk:Hungarikusz Firkász|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Kulmalukko ([[User talk:Kulmalukko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Discasto talk 23:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Castillo blanco ([[User talk:Castillo blanco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:49, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, VLu ([[User talk:VLu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Veverve ([[User talk:Veverve|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

TUSC token 0f64e8471b0e70424f51265fbc61e6b2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Talkback

Template:Talkback

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Mass uploading of images of extremely low quality and duplicates

Template:Autotranslate Микола Василечко ([[User talk:Микола Василечко|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)