User talk:Александр Мотин

Фотографии с kremlin.ru[edit]

К сожалению, условия их использования не соответствуют Commons:Licensing. Из условия никак не вытекает возможность создания любых производных работ. С просьбами о разъяснении надо обращаться к kremlin.ru. Смотрите также Commons:Deletion requests/License tags of russian websites. --EugeneZelenko 14:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Moscow-City 1.jpg[edit]

К сожалению, несмотря на свободный статус, такая фотография невозможна на коммонз - она является производной работой при отсутствии свободы панорамы. Alex Spade 17:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:USS IWO JIMA 01.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:USS IWO JIMA 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Brussels stock exchange is not La Bourse/De Beurs[edit]

Please don't move as they are not the same. --Foroa (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that most stock exhanges should be written with lower case as they are not proper names. --Foroa (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you rename all categories if have a bot?--Александр Мотин (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Day[edit]

Hello Alexander!

Do you live in Moscow? If yes: Are you in Moscow on May 9th, 2009. In that the Victory Day military parade takes place in Moscow. If you have time, could you please take some photos of the vehicles and upload them to Commons? After you have uploaded them, you can contact me, I help you to categorize the photos. Would be great, if it works! Best regards --High Contrast (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I`ll try ;)--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. As I stated: you can contact me on my talk page on Commons and I help out! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 07:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Lot Morrill, Brady-Handy photo portrait, ca1865-1880.jpg[edit]

Hello. It looks like the Library of Congress P&P catalog is down, so none of the images tagged with template:LOC-image will work. That happens occasionally, so try again in a few hours. --Tom (talk - email) 16:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Thanks for your reply--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porsche Cayenne taxi Moscow 5.JPG[edit]

File:Porsche Cayenne taxi Moscow 5.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Bilindustrien (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Александр Мотин!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Conveyor system of AvtoVAZ.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
Image:Kit body unknown 1.png was uncategorized on 13 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Spector102009.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuillermoFranco0410.JPG was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Emergency meeting following explosion at Domodedovo Airport.jpeg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj dubai 1.jpg[edit]

File:Burj dubai 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 04:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Flickr uploads[edit]

Hello Александр!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!

Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you upload images from flickr you must insert {{flickrreview}}. All flickr images must be checked by trusted users or administrators and this certain tag makes this possible. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. --High Contrast (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you forgot the {{flickrreview}}-tag in your uploads. This tag is essential! This tag must be put in all uploaded flockr images. Do not vandalize by not tagging your uploads! --High Contrast (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Александр Мотин (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj dubai 2.jpg[edit]

File:Burj dubai 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 06:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg[edit]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 06:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:East_4th_Ring_Road.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:East_4th_Ring_Road.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 94383d1730b465c1f6d2fe24ced545c2[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Темрюк 21.jpg[edit]

File:Темрюк 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nelson Rockefeller on TIME Magazine, May 22, 1939.jpg[edit]

File:Nelson Rockefeller on TIME Magazine, May 22, 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—RP88 14:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Категории[edit]

Приветствую! Заметил, что в ваших последних фотографиях Москвы вы проставляете только категорию улицы. По возможности, старайтесь ставить хотя бы две категории, которые бы отвечали на вопросы "Что?" и "Где?". То есть фото церкви на Саранской улице желательно как минимум поместить в категорию "Церкви в Москве" и "Саранская улица". Так же и с другими изображениями. --Stolbovsky (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо, постараюсь. Спасибо за замечание.--Александр Мотин (talk) 15:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

This file is missing the source link. lNeverCry 04:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ww2censor (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: These come from a Russian government website and are freely-licensed. See {{Mos.ru}}. lNeverCry 20:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the website but could not find any copyright statements of any find, but if you say so, I'm ok with that. Ww2censor (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: If you scroll to the bottom of https://www.mos.ru/ you'll see the CC license in light blue on the left. lNeverCry 20:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: "All materials are available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. If you use the materials please acknowledge the source and provide a link to the portal." https://www.mos.ru/en/ --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried several times and with different browsers to load this site but it does not load for me, except once before I nominated it for deletion. If this link https://www.mos.ru/en/ shows the CC license it would be preferable to have it in the permission fields of the {{Information}} template, so reviewers, who cannot find the license easily on the website, have a direct link to it in future. Thanks for the info. Ww2censor (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moskwa Metro Line 15.svg[edit]

Александр, здравствуйте! Скажите, пожалуйста, откуда вы брали цвет заливки для указанного файла? Просто в рувикипедийном модуле используется другой цвет, и хотелось бы привести их к единому виду. --Michgrig (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Привет, Michgrig! Цвет выбрал примерно. Конечно, его надо (было) привести к единому виду с тем, что в АИ. Спасибо.--Александр Мотин (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Переделаете? --Michgrig (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Схема метро с нанесённым на неё контуром Московской кольцевой железной дороги (2015).jpg[edit]

File:Схема метро с нанесённым на неё контуром Московской кольцевой железной дороги (2015).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A.Savin 01:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ciri Cosplay (The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt) • 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ciri Cosplay (The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt) • 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 06:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg[edit]

File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr2Commons[edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found at https://imgur.com/gallery/IL0LdPN BEFORE the post at Flickr. COM:LL.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found at https://imgur.com/gallery/IL0LdPN BEFORE the post at Flickr. COM:LL.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Прямая трансляция матча Перу - Дания в Московском метро.jpg[edit]

File:Прямая трансляция матча Перу - Дания в Московском метро.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2018 FIFA World Cup Russia Football Park on Moscow’s Red Square 1.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2018 FIFA World Cup Russia Football Park on Moscow’s Red Square 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2018 FIFA World Cup Russia Football Park on Moscow’s Red Square 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 22:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Hello, why all files are offered for deletion? Did you really check their attribution? TASS is a state unitary enterprise. "The assets of unitary enterprises belong to the federal government" (Per WP — Unitary enterprise). That means that exclusive copyright belongs to the federal government of Russia and not to the original author (photographer). So you mean that Russian President Office violated exclusive copyright of the Federal Government of Russia? It is funny because the website of the Russian President states "All content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International". --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Прошёлся по вашим правкам, из них следует, что вы немного понимаете по-русски, так что позволю себе ответить на великом и могучем. Во-первых, для иллюстраций с сайта Кремля используется шаблон {{Kremlin.ru}}, без него они удаляются. Во-вторых, автор вышеупомянутых изображений не пресс-служба Кремля, а ТАСС, а оно никогда и в жизни не распространяло свои материалы под CC-SA(-BY). Зайдите на COM:Форум, это сейчас там как раз обсуждается. Ну и в-третьих, вся эта история с Kremlin.ru есть ни что иное как большое отмывание лицензий, ибо авторами фотографий являются их фотографы, а не некая пресс-служба Кремля. Надеюсь дожить до того дня, когда весь этот кремлёвский фотохлам наконец-то снесут с викисклада. --A.Savin 13:34, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. Понял, но пока не согласен. Загляну туда.--Александр Мотин (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Посещение Национального центра управления обороной (В.В. Путин; 26 декабря 2018).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Посещение Национального центра управления обороной (В.В. Путин; 26 декабря 2018).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Посещение Национального центра управления обороной (В.В. Путин; 26 декабря 2018).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Геральт из Ривии (Скриншот из трейлера «A Night to Remember»).jpg

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg[edit]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Кассы автовокзала «Южные ворота».jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, GRuban (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	For getting stroi.mos.ru to release their files under a free license. GRuban (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dmitry Trapeznikov (2016).png[edit]

File:Dmitry Trapeznikov (2016).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ПашкаМушкин (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Совещание с членами Правительства (В. Путин; 11 августа 2020) – (03).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Совещание с членами Правительства (В. Путин; 11 августа 2020) – (03).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Совещание с членами Правительства (В. Путин; 11 августа 2020) – (03).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apteka 36 6.svg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Apteka 36 6.svg was recently deleted by Putnik for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8):

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Открытие станции «Электрозаводская» на БКЛ (01).jpeg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Brateevsky {talk} 09:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg[edit]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Video Game Screenshoot

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 17:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg[edit]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 18:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Открытие станции «Электрозаводская» на БКЛ (17).jpeg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Brateevsky {talk} 08:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Streets_in_Moscow_Oblast_by_name[edit]

Streets in Moscow Oblast by name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kaganer (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Я присоединил Category:Streets in Moscow Oblast by name (flat list) к тому же обсуждению. --Kaganer (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Переименования категорий[edit]

Переименования категорий осуществляются с помощью кнопки "переименовать", а не создания категории с нуля под новым именем. --A.Savin 10:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Могу ли я вас попросить удалить уменьшенные дубликаты по результатам обсуждения здесь: User talk:Roman Kubanskiy? Так долго получится для каждого файла искать дубликат, а вы наверное можете сразу удалить дубликаты с пометкой.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кремлёвская набережная (июнь 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove those spots in the sky --Michielverbeek 22:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 07:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Сосновая улица в Котельниках (июнь 2022) (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Сосновая улица в Котельниках (июнь 2022) (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Патриарший собор во имя Воскресения Христова (июнь 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Sharp and good exposure. PC needed to reduce the backward tilt. --Tagooty 02:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dmitrovskoye Highway (Moscow), Category:Varshavskoye Highway (Moscow)[edit]

Непонятные переименования категорий и непонятное добавление префикса "Moscow". Если ориентация на русскую Википедию - так вот, статье Варшавское шоссе (историческая дорога) соответствует категория Category:Warsaw highway, а по дороге в Подольске вообще статья не создана и категория на Викискладе не создана и надобность несозданного дизамбига Category:Varshavskoye Highway нулевая. Поэтому нет оснований переименовывать первоначальную категорию. Тоже самое по Дмитровскому шоссе, статья об автодороге "Дмитровское шоссе" называется А104 (автодорога)}. Соответственно, нет никакой надобности в переименовании первоначальной категории Category:Dmitrovskoye Highway Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от дальнейшего переименования дальнейших категорий. Также хочу добавить, что вашим правкам по категориям на Викискладе, мягко говоря, не рады. Brateevsky {talk} 07:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Я вроде бы указывал, что переименование сделано для разрешения неоднозначности. Странно, что вы не смогли самостоятельно разобраться. Например, "Варшавское шоссе" есть еще и в Рославле, и в Медыни. Кроме того, в карточке в русской Википедии и на Викиданных указано, что описываемое там "Варшавское шоссе" является адресообразующим объектом в Москве, а не где-то еще. Думаю вам следует более точно и тщательно сформулировать вашу аргументацию, чтобы ваша просьба ко мне была обоснованной и убедительной. Что касается последнего, то, пожалуйста, укажите ники этих участников Викисклада, чтобы ваше утверждение не было голословным. Буду рад ответить на дополнительные вопросы если таковые у вас остались.--Александр Мотин (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Например, "Варшавское шоссе" есть еще и в Рославле, и в Медыне." - допустим, есть, так и что? Пока категории нет, смысла в переименовании нет никакого. Категорию на Викискладе необходимо переименовывать при двух условиях: 1) есть две категории с одноимённым названием, 2) соответствующие объекты в Википедии (в данном случае - русскоязычной) имеют примерно схожий "вес" в узнаваемости. Что по Варшавскому шоссе, что по Дмитровскому ни 1 ни 2 условие не выполняются. В обоих случаях категория без префикса "Moscow" однозначно будет указывать на оба шоссе в Москве, и это правильно. Аргументация-то в общем, на поверхности, тут не нужно придумывать что-то сверхъестественное, тут обычный здравый смысл. Поэтому такие переименования, конечно, технически возможны, но с человеческой точки зрения - бесполезны. Даже если условные категории по Рославлю и Медыне будут, сначала они создаются, а потом происходит переименование. И то, без префикса даже в такой ситуации можно вполне обойтись, Варшавское шоссе в Москве на порядок более известнее, чем обычная дорога в населённом пункте вне Москвы. Полагаю, что тот же участник A.Savin, возможно, подтвердит мою версию (в любом случае его комментарий будет полезен, заодно, быть может, он скажет, что он вообще думает о данной системе переименований категорий по московским улицам и др.улицам в принципе). Brateevsky {talk} 09:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Проблема в том, что вы не ссылаетесь на какое-либо правило Commons. Было бы нагляднее если бы вы это сделали. Ну и, полагаю, вы можете обратиться еще и к Kaganer, чтобы узнать и его ответ касательно "бесполезных" переименований [1]. Предлагаю вам всё же воспользоваться функцией, о которой я вам напомнил ниже. В крайнем случае, можно продолжить тему по улицам на Форуме.--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Да, видимо данный участник собирается закладывать аналогичные категории для всех городов и деревень, где данное шоссе проходит. Это, безусловно, никак не помогает юзабилити категорий на Викискладе. Ещё следует обратить внимание на чрезмерную склонность участника к сутяжничеству, за что он, собственно, и получил бессрочку в русской википедии. Долго нянчиться с ним здесь я тоже не намерен. --A.Savin 10:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Вижу возразить тебе нечем. --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Братеевский уже достаточно ясно изложил, в чём проблемы с вашими массовыми правками, а у вас недавно уже был здесь эпический фейл с "by name (flat list)". Насколько я помню, на "ты" мы с вами не переходили. --A.Savin 10:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ничего ясного в изложении не увидел. Особенно с учетом приведенной правки Kaganer. Ведь в противном случае была бы приведена ссылка на правило Commons, а с этим, как видно, проблемы. Так хотя бы я, наконец, смог бы понять, что за "префикс" коллега имеет в виду. Ну а про "эпик-фейл" всё гиперболизировано от начала и до конца.--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: В контексте ваших непонятных и необоснованных претензий выше возник вопрос: с какой целью вы создали категорию Category:Volokolamskoye Highway (Moscow Oblast)? --Александр Мотин (talk) 08:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Это было давно ~~лет семнадцать назад~~. Возможно потому, что в русской вики две отдельные статьи, в отличие от Варшавского. Почему так -- спрашивайте тамошних авторов. --A.Savin 12:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ну так и вы спрашивайте у тамошних авторов почему Варшавское и Дмитровское шоссе указаны как улицы Москвы вместо необоснованных претензий и нелепых угроз блокировкой.--Александр Мотин (talk) 12:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Зачем мне их спрашивать, я и сам знаю, что часть Варшавского и часть Дмитровского шоссе расположены в Москве. --A.Savin 12:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Ну и от вас жду комментариев по созданной A.Savin категории Category:Volokolamskoye Highway (Moscow Oblast).--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

И все-таки укажите ники участников Викисклада, о которых вы говорили выше, либо дезавуируйте ваше агрессивное высказывание.--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

На всякий случай напомню вам о возможности выносить категории на обсуждение COM:CFD.--Александр Мотин (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tok Pisin ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

A.Savin 01:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё и в режиме войны правок, хотя консенсуса на форуме по этому поводу не было [2]. --A.Savin 01:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Good morning! :) Fabrication of the grounds for blocking is the reason for the removal of the administrator status.--Александр Мотин (talk) 05:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As well as an indefinite block on two active Wikimedia projects is a reason for global ban, by the way. Especially if the same trolling is being continued on an other project. Regards --A.Savin 11:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any diff with proof of vandalism, by the way. As soon as you present this proof we can continue the discussion. P.S. If the blockings you mentioned were not fabricated, then the discussion on Meta would have been started a long time ago :) I should remind you that for fabricating the grounds for indefinite blocking against me, one administrator of the Russian Wikipedia had already lost his status and still cannot return it in any way. I don't think you're tempted by that prospect, are you? That's why evidence is needed to take your threats seriously. --Александр Мотин (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Давайте всё же вернёмся на Викисклад, где мы, собственно, и находимся вроде бы. Я правильно понял, что вы и далее будете проталкивать вашу повестку с "Streets in ... by name (flat list)", по которой нет консенсуса? --A.Savin 11:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can I POV-push something if there is a discussion going on now and we are waiting for the outcome?--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

:)) --A.Savin 00:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Категории районов Москвы[edit]

Не нужно переименовывать категории и давать им глупые названия типа Category:Orekhovo-Borisovo Yuzhnoye District. Префикс District здесь не нужен совершенно от слова "совсем" - статья на русском называется Орехово-Борисово Южное, без всякого уточнения "район". В требованиях по наименованию совершенно нет пункта, что статья должна называться один в один с названием в английской Википедии. Пример: Москворечье-Сабурово -> Moskvorechye-Saburovo District -> Category:Moskvorechye-Saburovo. Я бы даже сказал наоборот, в Английской Википедии нужно убрать эти глупые префиксы. совершенно Пожалуйста, прекратите делать сомнительные правки по московской тематике на Викискладе. Вы реально мешаете всем русскоязычным участникам, в том числе и мне, заниматься ей. Категории я со временем переименую. Brateevsky {talk} 08:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

У меня как минимум с Kaganer другое мнение.[3] Направьте пожалуйста свои агрессивные нападки в сторону обсуждения на COM:CFD. Мое мнение совпадает с мнениями опытных участников касательно этих категорий. Инициируйте процедуру CFD для категории Category:Tverskoy District (Moscow), которую переименовал Павел, а там посмотрим насколько хватит ваших аргументов. P.S. А "все русскоязычные участники" это кто конкретно? Вы их официальный представитель? --Александр Мотин (talk) 08:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

По поводу «Тверской» ошибки нет, аргументировать этим примером не очень хорошо, потому что именно наименование «Тверской район» есть не только в Москве. Инициировать процедуру CFD я не буду — вы тоже сейчас переименовывали без неё, тут все равны, каждый может переименовать. Спасибо, конечно, что «подкинули» мне дофига работы. Знаете мы не в суде (а вы за все много лет в проектах Викимедиа вы ведёте себя, именно как будто вы находитесь там), давайте вы тоже вашу агрессию направите куда-нибудь, кроме Википедии и Викисклада. Я понял, что вы меня не услышали. Я предупредил. Ну что ж, в будущем я буду договариваться с другими русскоязычными администраторами, чтобы вы не мешали мне уже физически и технически править. В русской и английской Википедиях вы заблокированы, и я считаю это решение верным, и буду за него, если попробуете оспорить. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

А с какой работой вам нужно помочь? --Александр Мотин (talk) 08:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Как минимум - не мешать мне, а как максимум — убрать эти префиксы «District», где они не нужны. Ладно, начнём с минимума сначала. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Districts of the Czech Republic--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:12, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

А причём тут Чехия? Я про Москву говорю. Ладно, вы меня не понимаете, я всё сказал; мы не находим общий язык. Если что-то не поняли, — проблемы будут не у меня. Пока вернул категории, чтобы файлы не ссылались в пустоту. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ну это как минимум показывает, что чешскоговорящее сообщество Викисклада пока тоже не в курсе предложенных вами новаций в правилах и политиках касательно именования категорий, на которых вы настаиваете. Ну вот из Московской области пример — Category:Districts of Moscow Oblast.--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:18, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Я в целом понимаю, что вы имеете в виду. Например, если взять Category:Districts of Prague, то мы можем увидеть, что районы Праги не имеют слова District в своем названии. Этому может быть ряд причин. И английской Википедией это подтверждается (w:Category:Districts of Prague). Однако, мы с вами видим, что в отношении районов Москвы сложилась совершенно другая практика в английской Википедии (w:Category:Districts of Moscow). И для этого тоже есть веские причины. Таким образом, предложение: почему бы тогда вам не начать с английской Википедии и выяснить там этот вопрос для начала? Если будут озвучены и применены аргументы против слова District в названиях районов, то также сделаем и здесь. Идёт?--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Да, здорово, что поняли. Согласно правилам Викисклада, категории должны называться в целом на английском языке. Однако при этом они не должны ориентироваться на названия в Английской Википедии, и не должны копировать названия один в один. Это вредная практика по переименованию, и наводить какую-то систематизацию в этом случае бессмысленно. Английская Википедия - не авторитет для Викисклада. Уж скорее Русская Википедия - авторитет в плане названий в России, где русский язык ещё сто лет будет государственным. Я ещё могу понять переименование категорий а-ля Category:Orekhovo-Borisovo South -> Category:Orekhovo-Borisovo Yuzhnoye District, когда прежде всего идёт переименование South -> Yuzhnoye и также для районов в Москве с префиксами "Северное". "почему бы тогда вам не начать с английской Википедии и выяснить там этот вопрос для начала?" - ага, делать мне нечего. Мне проще убедить тех, кто пытается слепо следовать названиям в Английской Википедии. С другой стороны, надеюсь, может они сами в Английской Википедии до этого дойдут. Смысла же по категориям на Викискладе по районам Нагатино-Садовники, Москворечье-Сабурово, Дорогомилово и другим (у которых нет уточнений в Русской Википедии) искусственно добавлять префикс "District" - бессмысленно и глуповато. Brateevsky {talk} 11:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Ну а зачем вы тогда сами создавали "глуповатую и бессмысленную" категорию w:Category:Brateyevo District в английской Википедии? Что именно заставило вас сейчас изменить свое мнение по вопросу именования таких категорий? --Александр Мотин (talk) 12:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Да, это моя ошибка. Но это был далёкий 2012 год, когда я был на 10 лет моложе, так что посмотрел как названы другие статьи о районах Москвы, и назвал также по этому району. Brateevsky {talk} 10:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ответы что у вас, что у A.Savin как под копирку. Ну и исправьте тогда своё упущение. Потом и поговорим.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Касательно Дорогомилово и т.п. есть ещё и такая причина — Category:Things named after Dorogomilovo. Разве что надо подумать как все-таки правильно назвать родительскую категорию: оставить Dorogomilovo либо переименовать в Dorogomilovo Sloboda. Я, если честно, в контексте сказанного мной с трудом представляю корректность продвигаемой вами конструкции Category:Dorogomilovo (район Москвы) → Category:Things named after Dorogomilovo → Category:Dorogomilovo (Sloboda?). Да и в конце концов, вы реально считаете, что мы должны устраивать дебаты по каждой категории района нежели все переименовать с добавлением слова District? Такие дебаты будут, по моему мнению, контрпродуктивны, ведь все уже решено в английской Википедии, но туда вы не хотите идти со своими идеями, чтобы заняться оспариванием текущих названий статей о районах. Ну и ваше молчание по поводу заданного вам вопроса выше о созданной вами же w:Category:Brateyevo District, на мой взгляд, указывает на то, что это очередной вброс необоснованной претензии как и претензия A.Savin в соседнем обсуждении выше. Ему тоже стало резко неинтересно продолжать дискуссию, когда ему указали, что он создавал такие же категории, но которые почему-то ему сейчас резко перестали нравиться.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вы правы, Александр, мне действительно за последние месяцы сильно убавилась охота что-либо ещё делать для этой фашистской страны... Но таки да, ваша манера в определённые моменты начинать отвечать мне исключительно по-английски, действительно забавна и, безусловно, является одним из курьёзных проявлений именно того, за что вас, собственно, и ушли из русской википедии. И вы теперь срываете обиду на нас здесь, ой нехорошо. --A.Savin 11:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Ну так если вы не готовы что-то делать здесь, то вас никто и не держит. "Срываю обиду на вас здесь", бесцеремонно загружая многие тысячи свободных изображений, вероломно совершая тысячи конструктивных правок, вспоминая о вас только тогда, когда вы внезапно появляетесь со своими пустыми и надуманными претензиями ко мне за то, что сами и делали? :) Что касается английского языка: ну так если вы мне пишете "Vandalism warning" на английском, то почему же я должен с вами на другом языке общаться? В чем же курьезность? Ну а в целом это все, конечно, напоминает что-то вроде "я бежал за вами двадцать километров, чтобы сказать вам как вы мне безразличны" :)) --Александр Мотин (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Что касается того, с каким упорством вы и коллега A.Savin пишете мне про блокировки в русском и английском разделах, то начинает закрадываться мнение о том, что эти слишком частые пустые и необоснованные претензии в мой адрес на страницах проекта могут делаться с определенной целью. Вот вы сами сейчас сделали вброс какой-то необоснованной претензии и сами же пишете, что будете против разблокировки. Но я, мягко скажем, сомневаюсь, что вы сможете защитить позицию тех, кто сфабриковал эти блокировки :) --Александр Мотин (talk) 09:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Массовые изменения категоризации, проводимые одним участником - это гарантированная недоделка. Примеры уже есть - незавершенный перенос улиц из "районов" в "streets of район...", в результате которого всё вперемешку и кому это разгребать - неизвестно. Или перенос категорий здания в "buildings in такая-то улица". И не доделали, и назад не вернули. Нынешнее предприятие, положим, не столь затратно по времени, но поддерживать его силами одного участника - особо когда другие участники явно против - совершенно нереально. Тут максимум что необходимо - унификация "белых ворон" в существующих категория, не более. Retired electrician (talk) 20:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Retired electrician: По улицам районов Москвы, на мой взгляд, изначально вообще неправильно сделали — вручную переносить в "streets of район..." и следить за актуальностью будет слишком трудоемко. Надо ботом перенести данные улиц на Викиданные либо с ФИАС, либо с data.mos.ru, где указывается в каких районах улица расположена. С Викиданных нужные категории и подтягивать на страницу категории Викисклада. И потом также ботом раз там в год проверять на вандализм, расхождения в данных и обновлять. Что думаете? Пример подтягиваемых (автоматических) категорий с Викиданных если кто-то не понял — Category:Sergey Grishin (colonel).
- По районам Москвы. По моему мнению, нет никакой необходимости в срочном порядке переименовывать подкатегории в категориях районов Москвы и такой цели вроде бы никто и не ставит. Таким образом какое-никакое поле для творчества в названиях категорий у участников Викисклада остается.--Александр Мотин (talk) 21:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Церемония открытия участков автодорог М-12, М-5 и ЕКАД (сентябрь 2022) (01).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Церемония открытия участков автодорог М-12, М-5 и ЕКАД (сентябрь 2022) (01).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Церемония открытия участков автодорог М-12, М-5 и ЕКАД (сентябрь 2022) (01).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nizhegorodsky District[edit]

В сотый раз повторяю -- не удаление, а дисамбиг. При следующей такой правке будет блокировка. --A.Savin 11:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Так делай дизамбиги, я же не против. Их можно сделать и из красной ссылки, в чем проблема?--Александр Мотин (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

I blocked your account indefinitely since you accused another user in threats of physical harm [4] but refused to support the statement by the diffs [5]. In case an unblock request has been filed let me add for the reviewing administrator that (i) the user is wikilawyering all the time, and libel for which they were blocked was part of this wikilawyering - for example, he has three or four users in the same thread saying that what he is doing is against the policies but he is fully convinced that he is right and everybody else is wrong; and (ii) he has already been indeffed with TPA revoked in his home project - the Russian Wikipedia - and in his second home project - the English Wikipedia - for exactly same behavior, and of course he now says that the bans were illegal, that he is right and everybody else is wrong. If he is unblocked, this behavior will continue here. Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: The diff was presented above on that forum and I didn't say that there was threat of physical harm. I said exactly: "физическое" устранение. In English it translates as: "physically" suspend (from editorial work).--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the exact citation in Russian which you can see from the diff I presented on forum:

Я предупредил. Ну что ж, в будущем я буду договариваться с другими русскоязычными администраторами, чтобы вы не мешали мне уже физически и технически править. --Brateevsky 08:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I warned you. Well, in the future I will negotiate with other Russian-speaking administrators to stop you physically and technically. --Brateevsky 08:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

What exactly do you not like about my remark? And I did not refuse to provide a diff since I provided it there as well.--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid at this point your only option is an unblock request. I have enough experience to know that it is absolutely hopeless to convince you in anything, and even more hopeless to convince you that you have done anything wrong. Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Well you see the Russian text and you speak Russian as well. So what is the reason to leave me indef blocked? I didn't do what you're accusing me of.--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I should be grateful if you would review this blocking and unblock me since Ymblanter does not want to give an explanation for his aggressive actions. I came here to work which is quite clear from my total contribution. I would also like to add that when Ymblanter is saying here that I didn't provide diff and that's why he indef blocked me he is again not telling truth because I did provide diff [6] which supported my remark on the forum. This is clear abuse of administrator flag. P.S. I ask experienced administrators to also evaluate this blocking for signs of "harassing contributors to the Wikimedia projects". I ask you to study the facts, if necessary, about the fabrication of the ban in the English Wikipedia by Ymblanter who is therefore considered to be involved administrator here on Commons. All links available here: meta:Requests for comment/Global ban for Александр Мотин."

Decline reason: "I am native Russian language speaker and I know very well that "физическое устранение" means murder. Accusing a fellow user of planning this, that is really harassment and libel at the very least. Given all the recent conflicts you provoked, you are definitely wrong here. --A.Savin 07:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

@A.Savin and Ymblanter: Unfortunately, the statement that I allegedly accused my opponent of threatening to murder me does not correspond to the reality and this clearly indicates the fabricational nature of the blocking. And here's why. A word "устранение" according to the Russian wiktionary means "лишение возможности занимать какую-либо должность, заниматься чем-либо / deprivation of the opportunity to hold any position, to do anything". A word "устранение" according to the Russian wiktionary is also synonymous to a word отстранение "removal, discharge, suspending, ban". Do you confirm?--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[7] --A.Savin 11:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Do you confirm what I wrote with a link to the wiktionary? Please give an honest answer.--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some other remarks in the Russian Wikipedia regarding "устранить оппонента" ("suspend the opposing editor from something") [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Do they really say to "kill the opposing editor" since you stated that a word "устранить" means to murder someone? In order not to aggravate the situation you need to admit that you are wrong. This is a vivid case when someone really wants to suspend the user from editing who does not give a single reason for this. Completely unacceptable methods are being used. --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin and Ymblanter: Secondly. As I said above the opposing editor Brateevsky made the following remark about me: "Well, in the future I will negotiate with other Russian-speaking administrators to stop you physically and technically". Yesterday I informed my colleagues in a telegram chat "Wikimedia in Russia" about this fabricated blocking. An experienced editor Kaganer said that this Brateevsky's remark ("to stop you physically") is "extremely unethical" (direct quote). Paul also said that if a user once to be indefblocked for this extremely unethical remark then there is a little chance to be unblocked. And what about you? How do you evaluate Brateevsky's remark? --Александр Мотин (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Third. I would really not like my blocking to be considered by administrators who recently allow themselves the following statements on Commons:

Ymblanter [13] ("Russian government go and fuck yourself")

A.Savin [14] ("Indeed, in recent months, I have greatly decreased the desire to do anything else for this fascist country...")

And you indefblocked me for my inoffensive remark («to "physically" suspend») after Brateevsky said he was going "to stop me physically". Maybe we will try to find some solution after all? --Александр Мотин (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Нате вам всем дифф особенно Александру, и хватит уже меня упоминать. Значит так, жду извинений от Александра Мотин до 23:59 МСК воскресенья (2 октября) за такую вопиющую трактовку моих слов на русском. Я защищал себя и своё право на правки, чтобы не тратить лишнее время на разгребание «сломаннного» после сомнительных правок Александра. Никаких угроз от меня не было в помине. Мне кажется, даже за такую интерпретацию необходимо блокировать бессрочно. --Brateevsky {talk} 19:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
meta:Requests for comment/Blatant arbitrariness and abuse on the part of the Arbitration Committee of the Russian Wikipedia, harassment in Wikimedia projects. P.S. @EugeneZelenko: FYI.--Александр Мотин (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "On the RfC page for global ban proposals the blocking administrator Ymblanter and the reviewing administrator A.Savin disregarded my request and refused to provide translation of my sentence for which I was indefinitely blocked. This clearly indicates obviously fabricated grounds for indefinite blocking since if they translated my sentence for the English-speaking colleagues then everyone would see that there are no grounds at all for blocking my account. In addition, several colleagues directly pointed out that in my sentence there is no evidence that I allegedly accused the opposing editor of threats of physical harm or murder. In connection with the above, the blocking of my account should be overturned.--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Decline reason: "Русскоязычных администраторов здесь не много, так что я посмотрел вашу прозьбу. И должен сказать, что блокировка совершенно корректная. В последнее время в Викискладе были случаи, где участники сказали другим то, что по вашим словам Братеевский вам сказал, и их бессрочно блокировали. Так что ваши ложные обвинения являются грубейшей ошибкой и причиной бессрочной блокировки. Всё-таки я мог бы вас разблокировать, если вы признались бы в свою ошибку и принародно каялись бы, но ничего такого здесь нет и по-видимому не будет. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

@Taivo: Since you declined my unblock request, I ask you to translate my sentence into English, for which I was indefinitely blocked. Thus, other English-speaking colleagues would be able to see everything with their own eyes without anyone's interpretations.--Александр Мотин (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diff. "Недавно, угрожая мне на моей СО "физическим" устранением," and Google translation: "Recently, threatening me on my CO with "physical" elimination," Taivo (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: For some unknown reason, you are giving only a small part of my full statement avoiding the full context. Here is the full one [15]:

Удивительные дела, однако. Недавно, угрожая мне на моей СО "физическим" устранением, Brateevsky доказывал, что уточнения на Викискладе это плохо, а теперь рассказывает, что деревни обязательно должны иметь уточнения в своем названии. А почему только деревни? При этом следует обратить внимание, что сам же Brateevsky создавал категории вида Brateyevo District, но позднее от меня безосновательно требовал прекратить это делать под угрозой "физического" устранения. Наверное текущие потуги A.Savin и Brateevsky по фабрикации блокировки моей учётной записи в Commons — это и есть реализация этих угроз, я правильно понимаю, коллеги? --Александр Мотин 15:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Amazing things, however. Recently threatening to "physically" suspend me, Brateevsky argued that disambiguation for categories on Wikimedia Commons is bad, and now he says that villages must necessarily have a word "village" in their own category names. And why only villages then? At the same time, it should be noted that Brateevsky himself created categories like Brateyevo District but later he unreasonably demanded that I stop doing this threatening to "physically" suspend me. Colleagues, am I to understand it correctly that current attempts of A.Savin and Brateevsky to fabricate the blocking of my Commons account are certainly the realization of that threat? --Александр Мотин 15:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

If you insist on your version, there is nothing easier than to provide your own translation of my full statement. It is clear from the context that I never accused someone of threatening physical harm. But if you prefer to use a verb "to eliminate" instead of "to suspend" there is still nothing that proves your point, given the above context:

Everybody who is basically not a hard core controbuter should be eliminated from editing [16]
The proxies and AOL won't be immune but will probably be completely eliminated from editing [17]
He is banned and eliminated from editing [18]
If adopted, I'd be eliminated from contributing [19]
Their physical elimination from the plot is necessary [20]
The statement seems to infer that indeed two are eliminated [21] (from America's Next Top Model competition)

You can also clearly see that I used quotation marks for a word "physically" only:

I warned you. Well, in the future I will negotiate with other Russian-speaking administrators to stop you physically and technically. --Brateevsky 08:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC) [22]

And the most important thing is that if someone really threatened me, I would have informed the functionaries long ago.--Александр Мотин (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the user is continuing to misuse his talk page for trolling, and also, due to very likely to come Global ban, there is no point to discuss his block on Commons anyway, I would say let's revoke their talk page access too. --A.Savin 19:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Look, several weeks ago A.Savin, Brateevsky and Ymblanter had already attempted to fabricate the blocking of my account — COM:ANI: Category:Brateyevo and Category:Brateyevo District. A.Savin accused me that I was allegedly "adding a looping category (making "Brateyevo District" both paternal and a subcat of "Brateyevo")". But look at what really happened:

21:46 UTC: I added Category:Things named after Brateyevo to the Category:Brateyevo District since reliable source says that the district was named after Brateyevo and added the official site of the district confirming this fact to Wikidata [23].
21:46 UTC: I created Category:Things named after Brateyevo and added category Category:Brateyevo.
21:49 UTC: I removed Category:Brateyevo District from Category:Brateyevo to eliminate (!) looping.
At that time the category structure had the following form: Category:Brateyevo District → Category:Things named after Brateyevo → Category:Brateyevo. Do you see any categories looping? Now look what A.Savin had done:
00:13 UTC: A.Savin added Category:Brateyevo District to Category:Brateyevo.
00:16 UTC: A.Savin removed Category:Things named after Brateyevo from Category:Brateyevo District adding a commentary to his edit: it's not "named after". But RS added by me to Wikidata says exactly the opposite: "The name of this district comes from the village of Brateyevo". When I tried to restore the correct category structure A.Savin started edit warring causing the categories looping. When I saw that he was provoking a conflict, I avoided the edit war.
And now the current category structure is: Category:Things named after Brateyevo → Category:Brateyevo → Category:Brateyevo District. Is that right? Really?

Compare it to the existing consensus category system:
Category:Ford Taunus → Category:Things named after Taunus → Category:Taunus

Category:Taroko National Park → Category:Things named after Taroko → Category:Taroko (Place) etc.

And now look again why they demanded to block me falsifying the facts:

In both categories, an indefblocked long-term abuser from Russian Wikipedia is persistently editwarring: for Category:Brateyevo removal of the only one location category, and for Category:Brateyevo District adding a looping category (making "Brateyevo District" both paternal and a subcat of "Brateyevo"). I hereby request temporarily full-protection of both categories, or sanctions against the abuser. -- A.Savin 02:03, 17 September 2022

In principle, if I were A. Savin, I would apply sanctions to the user. Wikimedia Commons administrators have the right to block problem users from Wikimedia Commons. =) And the user, unfortunately, is problematic. --Brateevsky 14:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Now you clearly see that their idea was to fabricate the blocking of my account. I would like you to approach the issue objectively and impartially and unblock my account since this indefinite blocking is obviously fabricated, just as they tried to do it in the above case.--Александр Мотин (talk) 21:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All this can be true (I even did not read that thoroughly), but you were blocked due to diff. This is not fabricated. Now I reblocked you without talkpage access, because you seem to be unable to understand, that such accusations are not allowed in Wikimedia projects. Taivo (talk) 06:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Александр Мотин

Фотографии с kremlin.ru[edit]

Image:Moscow-City 1.jpg[edit]

Image:USS IWO JIMA 01.jpg[edit]

The Brussels stock exchange is not La Bourse/De Beurs[edit]

Victory Day[edit]

Re: File:Lot Morrill, Brady-Handy photo portrait, ca1865-1880.jpg[edit]

File:Porsche Cayenne taxi Moscow 5.JPG[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Burj dubai 1.jpg[edit]

Your Flickr uploads[edit]

File:Burj dubai 2.jpg[edit]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:East_4th_Ring_Road.jpg[edit]

TUSC token 94383d1730b465c1f6d2fe24ced545c2[edit]

File:Темрюк 21.jpg[edit]

File:Nelson Rockefeller on TIME Magazine, May 22, 1939.jpg[edit]

Категории[edit]

File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Информационный щит «Вы въезжаете в зону платной парковки» (Москва).jpg[edit]

File:Moskwa Metro Line 15.svg[edit]

File:Схема метро с нанесённым на неё контуром Московской кольцевой железной дороги (2015).jpg[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg[edit]

File:Знак «Парковка только для электромобилей» в Москве.jpg[edit]

Flickr2Commons[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4) • 2.png[edit]

File:Gloria cosplay (Devil May Cry 4).png[edit]

File:Прямая трансляция матча Перу - Дания в Московском метро.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:2018 FIFA World Cup Russia Football Park on Moscow’s Red Square 1.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Посещение Национального центра управления обороной (В.В. Путин; 26 декабря 2018).jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Burj dubai 3.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

File:Dmitry Trapeznikov (2016).png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Совещание с членами Правительства (В. Путин; 11 августа 2020) – (03).jpg[edit]

File:Apteka 36 6.svg was recently deleted[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg[edit]

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Category:Streets_in_Moscow_Oblast_by_name[edit]

Переименования категорий[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Category:Dmitrovskoye Highway (Moscow), Category:Varshavskoye Highway (Moscow)[edit]

Vandalism warning[edit]

Категории районов Москвы[edit]

Copyright status: File:Церемония открытия участков автодорог М-12, М-5 и ЕКАД (сентябрь 2022) (01).jpg[edit]

Category:Nizhegorodsky District[edit]

September 2022[edit]

Navigation menu

Search