User talk:Jbarta/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jbarta!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jbarta!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dwain_Lingenfelter.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dwain_Lingenfelter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dwain_Lingenfelter.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

File:25-zittara-carbine_(enlarged).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:25-zittara-carbine_(enlarged).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DustyComputer (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

hi there,

thank you for editing and improving on so many images in the workshop, you do great work. Gryffindor (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, my pleasure and thank-you. Jbarta (talk) 15:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Oktoberkinder.jpg

thank you for repairing little Lenin :-) An-d (talk)

You're welcome. Jbarta (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Ancona Italian synagogue destroy 1932.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

I simply edited the image to make it more presentable. If some detail regarding the image's documentation is missing, then please unhook yourself from a bot and resolve this problem yourself by adding whatever bit of information would put your universe back in proper order.
This message added automatically by BuzzoffBot, if you need help about it please read the text above again. If you still need help, just keep wandering around asking anyone who looks like they might actually care. --BuzzoffBot

Thank you

Thank you for the recent larger uploads you made of both Portledge Manor house in Devon, as well as the portrait of Lawrence Shackleford Holt. Much appreciated. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 20:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

My pleasure. Jbarta (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Old_picture_of_parents.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Old_picture_of_parents.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Boy_Scouts_of_America2.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boy_Scouts_of_America2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gadget850 (talk) 13:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Kalakauapainting.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Tell City Oddfellows' Lodge

Thanks very much for repairing the corruption; I never figured out what happened with it. Nyttend (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Interestingly, it wasn't simply a corrupted image. The top and bottom halves were different, as if they were two images snapped at the same time with slightly different exposure settings. At any rate, I'm glad we got it sorted out without too much trouble. Jbarta (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 3f1c10285e2a46e722643517f5ab3be8

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Timestamp removal

Out of interest, how do you remove timestamps? Eg this to this. Ultra7 (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Mostly using a "clone tool". It's an editing tool available in most graphic editing applications. Basically it copies a bit of an image from one area and pastes it to another. Very handy little tool ;-) Jbarta (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Cool. It looks very good at approximating, judging by the legal lettering at the bottom of the bus. Ultra7 (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes and no. The legal lettering was touched up using the clone tool, but maybe not how you're thinking. Once the timestamp was eliminated, the missing parts of the legal lettering had to be filled in and reconstructed by cloning bits of other lettering. Also keep in mind that such an effort does not have to be perfect. It just has to look ok on casual viewing. If you look carefully at most watermark removals, you can see what I mean. A very enlightening way to view editing differences is to open both images and paste one directly on top of another as a separate layer. Then switch back and forth between the layers and the telltale edits will pop out at you. Jbarta (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Oval cropping

Thanks much for your improvements to File:Edith Mahier Jambalaya 1916.jpg. I have no idea how you did that, but it looks good! Might you please consider doing similar work on File:L H Perez 1914 Jambalaya.jpg? Best wishes, -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Jbarta (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Happy 2012 to you. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

watermark removal

Hallo Jbarta, thanks for your work at File:Karin_Axelsson-Sonic_Syndicate-wrtn-2010.jpg#filehistory. However, one suggestion: please choose the highest jpeg quality your editing program can do if you do image edits. As the file got smaller here I suspect that you did not do so. That would help to preserve the best possible quality of our iamges. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The app I used is set to the lowest compression setting available. I've noticed that between apps, the effective minimum compression can vary somewhat. In this instance I think we'll be fine. Thanks for the tip though ;-) Jbarta (talk) 03:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Okay, fine that you are aware! :-) Even inside programs the compression can vary greatly. For example in GIMP: even if you set to quality 100 it still does color compression (subsampling) (that setting which is hidden per default). Recently I changed the standard setting in my GIMP therefore so I do not miss that. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Really should use a different file name

When cropping something like File:Nellie Cornish c. 1922.jpg, you should use a different filename and leave the original intact. This is a portrait from a 1922 document. Someone might well want the most accurate available representation of what was in that 1922 document, and the cropped version is not that. - Jmabel ! talk 01:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

It can go either way. To make a separate file for all such edits would leave images scattered all over. Further, I would argue that for our purposes, this image is a representation of the person, not a representation of the image as we found it. Even further, many older photos have extra around them that I'm sure the photographer figured would be trimmed to finished size. Here and here are perfect examples. And finally, the originals are still available in the history if anyone wants them or if it's felt the edit is truly inappropriate. Is that reasonable? – JBarta (talk) 01:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Good work

Good work at File:Batasia Loop of Darjeeling Himalayan Railway.jpg, especially the second one :) Too bad the contributor is not willing to remove those watermarks himself so we need to spend all this work ourselves. I tagged/am tagging the rest of their images he uploaded, and hopefully someone can clean them up, at least the ones which are used. --Muhandes (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Watermarks

Again, good job removing those watermarks. You missed a watermark on File:Salna Bari , Bhalukpong.jpg on the right middle. This editor usually has at least two of them... sneaky :) --Muhandes (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

A couple of his even had a third watermark. Oh well. – JBarta (talk) 15:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Klopsch.jpg

That's really a lot better! Thank you very much! --Ephraim33 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem Smile – JBarta (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Cleaning up flickr descriptions

Hi Jbarta, thanks for helping out -- but don't worry, I'll get to this when I take care of the categories and everything. --X-Weinzar (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok. It wasn't until I had done a few when I realized the comments had probably just been copied over from the flickr descriptions. I'm glad you've got it covered and I'll leave it alone. – JBarta (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Bourke-White portrait of Sarojini Naidu - Bombay 1946.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bourke-White portrait of Sarojini Naidu - Bombay 1946.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Neoplan N4016td Kielce.jpg

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Neoplan N4016td Kielce.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Quibik (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

M0tty (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Funeral at Rajghat1249.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jayantanth (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Provins - Eglise Saint-Ayoul - IMG 1180.jpg

Hi Jbarta

I see that you have downloaded a new version of my picture : Provins - Eglise Saint-Ayoul - IMG 1180.jpg

The size and dimension of my initial picture was : 2 592 × 3 888 (1,98 Mio)
The size and dimension of your picture modified is now 2 389 × 3 810 (4,56 Mio). Reduction of the dimension but significant increase of the size ! How can you explain that ?

Since the quality of the picture has been changed, I proceed to a revert of your modification. Then I will download a new version of the picture with your suggested dimension.

Best Regards. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Makes no sense to leave the image crooked as it was and nothing you wrote above makes much sense. Best just leave the image as I modified it and all will be well... I promise ;-) – JBarta (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I understand your point of view but the size of your new image is still incorrect : 4,56 Mio (increase of the initial size). Please check that. Which software do you use for this modification. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
May be I am not clear. My concern is only about the size of the picture, not the object of your modification (I agree that).
Normally, if you reduce the dimension : from 2592×3888 to 2389×3810 you should have a reduction of the size : something less than 1.98 Mio. It is not the case with your modification: new size : 4.56 Mio. That means we have a modification of the quality of the image. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The size is not "incorrect". The size (in Mb) is a reflection of the quality settings the image was saved at. I simply save JPGs at a higher quality (lower compression) than you. For our purposes here, saving at low compression is a good thing. For more information read about JPG compression. After you do that, if you still have questions, I'll be happy to try and answer them. – JBarta (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I always thought that if you increase the size of a picture (whatever the compression is), you add bits/pixels in the file. These new pixels are not the original pixels (as captured by the camera), they have been generated by the algorithm. In other words, if you reduce the compression (from a compressed picture), you add pixels, where they come from ? Where I am wrong ? --Poudou99 (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
In fact, this is not really important. Let's continue to add pictures in Commons ;-). It is more interesting, isn't it ? Regards, --Poudou99 (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
In a way you are correct, once an image has been saved at higher compression, detail is (or may be) lost. Re-saving at a lower compression does not bring that detail back and the jpg algorithm does use more bytes to save the file (even though it is lower quality). Is anything gained by saving a lower quality image at a lower jpg compression? In this instance, since the image was rotated and new gradients created, yes. In many cases however, no. Is there any harm to saving a lower quality image at a lower jpg compression? No. The only possible drawback is the bandwidth used to download the extra megabytes. When I edit images on Commons, I save everything at low jpg compression. That assures that (near) maximum possible quality is always retained. – JBarta (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

File:GEN Carns Michael Patrick Chamberlain.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GEN Carns Michael Patrick Chamberlain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

88.64.117.189 20:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Tram liberec f.jpg

Hi, you re-added the 'watermark' tag to this image. Where's the watermark? – JBarta (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry ! It was my template... I always saw the sign... Kevin .B [Let's talk about it!] 12:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Abel Xavier.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Richard Baer and Karl Höcker.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Richard Baer and Karl Höcker.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

removing watermarks

Please, don't remove my watermarks. This is protection from hackers, who want to stole my pictures without my agreement.

Szczecinolog (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I understand your concern, but Commons policy discourages watermarks. By uploading images with watermarks, you create extra work for other editors who must remove them. Besides, don't you think if a hacker want to stole your images they would just remove the watermark themselves? Place attribution/credit information on the image description page or EXIF metadata... not in the images themselves. – JBarta (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kunar Asadabad Square.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kunar Asadabad Square.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

とある白い猫 ちぃ? 14:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Jagatjit Palace - Kapurthala Sainik School.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 20:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Baku Nikolay with sister Anna.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Baku Nikolay with sister Anna.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Trex2001 (talk) 08:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Gurupi 5.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gurupi 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 3.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 4.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 4.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 5.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Parapente 6.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Parapente 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 12:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Prefeitura 1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Prefeitura 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 13:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Axixa Prefeitura 1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Axixa Prefeitura 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 13:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Gurupi 4.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gurupi 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 13:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Gurupi 3.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gurupi 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.134.93.93 13:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Αντρέι Αλεξέγιεβιτς Αμαλρίκ.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Αντρέι Αλεξέγιεβιτς Αμαλρίκ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SV1XV (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Ruyanagodruya.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ruyanagodruya.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Die Bilder sind aus einer Publikation von 1873

Servus,

die Bilder stammen aus einem alten Druck, zu dem es keinen Rechtsinhaber mehr gibt!

Johann Nepomuk von Heinrich: Der Wegweiser im Herrenbad des Römischen Bades am Praterstern in Wien, Verlag der Actien-Gesellschaft für Hotels und Bade-Anstalten, Wien, 1873 (mit 1 Plan). Johann Nepomuk von Heinrich: Der Wegweiser im Damen- und Herrenbad des Römischen Bades am Praterstern in Wien, Verlag der Actien-Gesellschaft für Hotels und Bade-Anstalten, Wien, 1874 (mit 5 Plänen und Pressedokumentation).

Schauen Sie doch einfach hier:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Römisches_Bad_(Wien)

Schöne Grüße

Praterstern

I understand. However, you should still add the correct information to the image description pages. Who is the author? Did you scan it? If so, you can write "scanned from old print" for source. You are not the author and it is not your own work. You can add the information in German if you wish. Also, you are not the copyright owner. It is public domain, so you should also change the license tag. – JBarta (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Request

Could you enhance the colours of the Higher Resolution Raja Ravi Varma Images I uploaded.They are yellowish.Thank you kindly. Linguisticgeek (talk) 05:35, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

I noticed. There are several, but I'll peck away at them a couple at a time. – JBarta (talk) 07:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Jbarta. You have new messages at File talk:Biographies of living persons.jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for enhancing colours of Ravi Varma images.Bhupinder Singh contrast ?.Zoom in and compare both the versions.new one looks looks patchy to me especially on the borders.Linguisticgeek (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I see what you mean. Reducing the contrast brought out a bunch of stuff in the background. I cleaned that up. Have a look at it now. Should be better. – JBarta (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Nygemätaren grädde.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nygemätaren grädde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Herby talk thyme 09:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Perspective control and cropping

Hi Jbarta. Thank you for correcting the perspective and cropping my photograph (my intermediate upload was due to an edit conflict). If you have time, it would be great if you could do the same for these three photographs of paintings by Alexandre Calame. --Leyo 18:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for having done two of them. May I ask which software you are using? --Leyo 10:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
All three are done now. My apologies for not getting to the third sooner. I have procrastination issues which I will need to do something about one of these days ;-) And I used GIMP for the straightening & cropping. – JBarta (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. There was certainly no hurry. --Leyo 11:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Victor Cruz

Nice improvement, thank you. --David Shankbone (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank-you and you're welcome. – JBarta (talk) 06:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me I am going to try my best to fix this

Yeah Jbarta I just wanted to let you know I am going to fix that problem right up. I just happened to put that picture up, for the main reason being that Frank Llaneza happened to be my grandfather, and I wanted to honor him by placing a picture on his wikipedia page. I simply just uploaded the picture that my grandmother gave to me I had no idea their was a problem with copyright issues.

Maybe I should have said "duplicate". – JBarta (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Frank Llaneza.jpeg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Frank Llaneza.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chesdovi (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

PD-ineligible

Hello Jbarta,

I have published a lot of self-made French departement route signs in the last weeks. I made them myself using the svg-program Inkscape and therefore those images are under my copyright. I published them using the normal license cc-by-sa-3.0, but you changed it to PD-ineligible. Like on the page File:Route départementale française 607.svg‎. What is the reason of this? Croonstad (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyfraud. --Leyo 01:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, in this instance it's more like copy-misunderstanding. A copyright cannot be claimed on just anything. Your sign images are simply letters and numbers. This is not considered an original and creative work subject to copyright protection. See Category:PD ineligible for typical examples. (It should be noted that there are probably images in that category that shouldn't be there, but you'll get the general idea.) I didn't tag all your road sign images, just some of them. I was hoping that in the interest of accuracy, you might re-tag the rest of them yourself. – JBarta (talk) 03:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I published them in the Netherlands and under Dutch Law (Auteurswet 1912, article 10.1) I'm allowed to claim copyright on all types of paintings, designs and sketches. So I won't change the license at all signs. I just made them for the Dutch wikipedia. Anybody else may use it, but I'm still the 'author' of this work. Croonstad (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
You're greatly misunderstanding copyright law. You cannot copyright a number... or a letter... in ANY country. For the sake of argument, let's suppose you could. Let's suppose you make a yellow square with the number 10 on it. Then legally, you could demand compensation if someone else makes a yellow square with the number 10 on it and tries to use it. And how do you know someone else hasn't already "copyrighted" a yellow square with the number 10 on it? You think you would be the first person to copyright the number 10? Anyhow, a copyright is a legally enforcable right granted to the author of original creative works. A yellow square with a few letters and numbers on it is neither original or creative. A copyright isn't something you can slap on any old thing just because you drew it. The work has to be copyrightable... and no matter what you wish, no matter what you think, a few letters and numbers on a yellow rectangle is simply, utterly and totally NOT copyrightable. Period. – JBarta (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm not claiming copyright on the square + number, but I'm claiming copyright on the image I made. Anybody can make an image which a yellow square and the text D607, but it will never be exactly the same. Croonstad (talk) 11:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
It's not a really big deal and I just made those images for pages like this. But I can't store images on the Dutch wikipedia, so you have to put them on Commons, with all types of copyright policies. I'm interested in roads, not in law. Croonstad (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Make the images and list yourself as the author. That's fine and you get all the credit in the world. But for the sake of accuracy, consider using the PD tag for such images. – JBarta (talk) 11:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Ctouche.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ctouche.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ctouche.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sorry, insufficient information. --Fin del comunicado - Luneta.png Zóram Hákān Comunicar 17:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

CC-BY 3.0 = PD?

(Forgive the orthography and grammar, Google Translator)

User Jbarta:

I noticed you changed the license of my files, from CC-BY 3.0 to PD. Sorry, but you're committing a violation of the 27th article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and a violation of the Federal Law of Copyright in Mexico (my country), which is the 28th article of the Constitution of the United Mexican States. The files:

are part of the package Íconos del Mago (“Icons of the Magus”), which is under the license CreativeCommons-Attribution 3.0 (legal text here).

The {{PD-shape}} template is for single images, without details. It even includes a sample from a heptagon no shadows or colors. My icon would be a candidate for this license if it were like this picture, but it is not. My icon include fill, shadows, brightness and borders —further metadata— representative of the Íconos del Mago.

The complete set of Íconos del Mago you can check here, in flickr.

I will reverse your changes to my files and return the license originally assigned by me, Arturo D. Castillo, representative and project manager of Industrias Helix ©. Remember to respect the laws and international agreements. I like the public domain, but also I want an attribution to my work when I think needed —for that reason they were created the Creative Commons—.

Good day, Jbarta.

End of statementLuneta.png Zóram Hákān Talk 18:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

You can, of course, credit yourself as the author on the image description page. However "copyright" is a legal protection granted to works that meet a certain level of creativity and originality. Those slightly stylized individual water droplets certainly do not rise to that level. If they did, then all these various droplet images are also copyrighted and your image probably violates someone else's copyright. Absurd if you think about it. This is why images must meet a threshold of originality to be copyrightable. At any rate, your droplet images (along with most of the others in that image search) are public domain and would lose in a copyright suit regardless of what copyright tag you (or anyone else) wishes to place on them. Again, by all means, list yourself as the author, but in the interests of accuracy, I would ask that you use the proper PD tags. – JBarta (talk) 19:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I would also suggest that most, if not ALL of those images you mention on flickr individually fail to pass the threshold of originality to qualify for legal copyright protection. Many people have a gross misunderstanding of copyright and are very eager to slap a copyright tag on just about anything... but that doesn't mean that the copyright is valid, accurate or enforcable. – JBarta (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussion moved to File talk:Gota01.svg.

File:Foto26y.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Foto26y.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Αντρέι Αλεξέγιεβιτς Αμαλρίκ.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Αντρέι Αλεξέγιεβιτς Αμαλρίκ.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SV1XV (talk) 17:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Red Dragon lander.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Red Dragon lander.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Craigboy (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:IMMANUVEL.JPEG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IMMANUVEL.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Art-top (talk) 04:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Joël Canapa.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Air India Boeing 747-437 d'Silva.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Congratulation

Smile I congratulate you for the image contributions on Commons recently. Keep up the good work. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC).

And to think that not so long ago you were hoping to see me hung up by my thumbs... – JBarta (talk) 18:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Some of the words you used for a file marked for DR offended me. Otherwise, remember, I am the first person to congratulate you on Commons. I've no ill-feeling and I wish you all the very best. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC).
I've been thanked quite a few times, but it is quite likely that you're the first to congratulate me... so you may indeed be correct. At any rate, thank you for the congratulations and all the best to you as well. – JBarta (talk) 19:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Steve King

What did you do to the Steve King photo to make it look clearer? Also, could you do that without cropping it? I'm going to be using it in a gallery and it's best if all of the photos are the same size. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

To be clear, I'm referring to File:Steve A. King - Official Portrait - 79th GA.jpg. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Un-cropped image uploaded. – JBarta (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks - and thanks for making a cropped version for the 80th GA gallery - I re-uploaded that one as File:Steve A. King - Official Portrait - 79th GA cropped.jpg (crediting you, of course). I'm still curious as to how you made the photo look clearer - It'll be a little bit before I upload the other images for the 79th GA gallery, but it'd be great to be able to lighten the others as they need it. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I just played with it for a while trying to get it lighter and more natural looking. No special technique. – JBarta (talk) 23:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

About Minimonos Copyright issue(s)

The website creators gave me permission to publish pictures of their work on Wikipedia as free content. Am I not allowed to post it still? -ZeldaZach

Discussion moved to User_talk:ZeldaZach#copyrighted_Minimonos_content. – JBarta (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


Hola

La otra vez hize lo mismo deje un mensaje en la discución pero la borrarón igual sin ni siquiera decirme nada.--DJMalik (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then please make your case on the image's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the image. – JBarta (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Elanoides forficatus Mpio Maués.jpg

Nice crop, but please hold fire on pic edits until after the Flickr reviewer bot has verified the license first, if it doesn't find the original it creates extra work for an admin reviewer ;-) Thanks! MPF (talk) 01:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

I knew it created an extra step, but didn't think it was a big deal. Will try to be more mindful of that in the future.– JBarta (talk) 01:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for correction

Thank you for fixing File:Spisska_Nova_Ves,_kosciol,_01.JPG!. dariusz woźniak (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

No problem ;-) – JBarta (talk) 22:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Why proposing to deletion "own work" ?

Hi,

You proposed for deletion a list of items there:Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_of_User:Ysa-Gudule

If the disk covers are likely copyringhted, I just wonder why you added their own photography too with no real justification "The few remaining are probably also copyrighted and/or lifted from somewhere ". What is this "probably" ? Can you show us from where?

I just had a look at the pictures exif, see File:François_Pierron.jpg, the exif says "Copyright holder YSABELLE MATHIEU alias GUDULE", and the exposure/ISO/time are compatible with a live picture (but not with a picture of a picture).

Moreover, a simple google search with that name links to the website of a photograph: http://www.lezard-de-gudule.com/

I really dont understand.

--YannickPatois (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

If you feel some of the images should not be deleted, feel free to add your comments to the deletion nomination page. You make a good point and it's very possble that a few of those images should not be in that list. – JBarta (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
And one more thing... regarding the proposed deletion of "own work". Some (many) uploaders have a very broad interpretation of the phrase "own work" and have expanded it to include anything they might wish to upload... "I copied it and uploaded it to Commons, therefore it is my own work". Given that generality, and given specifically an uploader who has claimed may copyrighted files as "own work", any other files that he claims as his "own work" are also under suspicion. – JBarta (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Robert shea.jpg

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert shea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 16:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Watermark

With a lot of patience:-). Simply, I correct the gradient (copied on a different layer, in Photoshop) a piece a time, and then correct the border, if necessary.
I had already rotated and dewatermarked this other file, so now I have uploaded it. --GianniG46 (talk) 08:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful, looks good :-) – JBarta (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Capture0 36 18.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Capture0 36 18.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Stop being rude and without respect!

Hallo Jbarta, stop being rude and without respect! → diff. COM:NOTCENSORED is not known to you, is it? --Saibo (Δ) 01:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

There was nothing rude or disrespectful about it. He has a history of uploading images of his wife and they continue to be deleted for the same reasons. And yes, I do know COM:NOTCENSORED. Perhaps it is you who might familiarize yourself with COM:PENIS and COM:PORN. This has nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with being a juvenile nuisance. – JBarta (talk) 01:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Sure, it is. You are treating his contributions like dirt. There are more respectful ways to approach a user if you think he should change his contributions. --Saibo (Δ) 02:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Madurai Airport Front view.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Madurai Airport Front view.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Nike-zoom-lebron-2-ii-shoes-white-navy-varsity-red-309378-441.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nike-zoom-lebron-2-ii-shoes-white-navy-varsity-red-309378-441.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.jpg

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Kam Solusar (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

AYUDA

Saudos desde España!!! Podrias ayudarme y recortar una foto k acabo de acerle de Isidre Esteve, con k busques Isidre Esteve aqui aparera, ya veras lo k tienes k recortar, gracias de antemano. --Campeones 2008 (talk) 21:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I need a link to the image. And when you write, be sure to use proper spelling and grammar so it translates completely and correctly. – JBarta (talk) 01:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Germi mosque-2012.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Germi mosque-2012.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MPF (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Khan kandi.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Khan kandi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MPF (talk) 16:36, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Germi Best Panorama.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Germi Best Panorama.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MPF (talk) 16:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Khan kandi1.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Khan kandi1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MPF (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Pagina: Fello Suberví

Buenas tardes a todos amigos de esta red de Wikipedia, Quiero expresar mi desagrado y la falta de consideración que han tenido con mi articulo sobre el político dominicano Fello Suberví. Hace ya semanas que cuando me empezaron a informar sobre las deficiencias que tenia el articulo se la corregimos, y ya esta totalmente acto para seguir en Wikipedia. Pero todavía persisten las plantillas de mantenimiento arriba del articulo y esto le quita credibilidad a mi articulo. Estoy sumamente molesto con Wikipedia y con todos los que han hecho imposible mi trabajo. Si tienen que revisarlo de nuevo, revísenlo pero solo quiero que mi articulo este libre de todo, y que los wikepdistas y usarios del Internet puedan encontrar en esta biblioteca virtual esta biografía de este político dominicano que le sobran los meritos. Muchos les han cambiado y eliminado cosas a mi articulo sin mi autorización y he permanecido en silencio porque solo quiero que mi articulo este en la red. Ademas me eliminan mis fotos y tengo licencias de todas. Por favor que alguien aquí me ayude para poder resolver este grave problema. De lo contrario estoy dispuesto a salirme de Wikipedia porque irrespetan mis derechos como articulista. Saludos, Politicon --Fellismo Histórico Unido (talk) 19:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Höcker Album.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Höcker Album.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 06:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Shovkat Alakbarova.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Shovkat Alakbarova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Arantz (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Some help here?

Hi, Jbarta! I wanted to add this picture to this article. The problem is that the colors aren't correct. They should be more alike this smaller version of the picture, which isn't that great since his skin color looks a little yellowish (he was white). So I remembered that you once did a great job turning this into this. I wonder if you could do it again? --Lecen (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Gave it a whirl. – JBarta (talk) 08:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
You improved the painting a lot. I wonder you could do something about his skin color and the white areas such as his gloves? They still look too dar. Please compare it with this picture and this other one. --Lecen (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Played with it a little more. Not sure if it's an improvement and I'm not sure if I can be of any more use here. (Truth be told, I'm not really liking my latest "improvement". I think the first edit I did is the superior one.) – JBarta (talk) 01:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very, very much, JBarta. The picture looks very good. I owe you another. Cheers! --Lecen (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Станція метро «Іподром» 01.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Станція метро «Іподром» 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Order of Culture(Japan).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Order of Culture(Japan).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

whym (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Grace Kim Wiki pic.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grace Kim Wiki pic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 14:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 00:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Romet Pony M3.jpeg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Romet Pony M3.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Romet Pony M3.jpeg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Question

What program do you use to reduce perspective distortion? Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

ShiftN is very useful. GIMP also has a handy perspective tool. – JBarta (talk) 03:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much! Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:38, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Portrait of Steven Cairney Artist Painter.jpg

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Steven Cairney Artist Painter.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 20:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Heidi Brühl (1942-1991).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Heidi Brühl (1942-1991).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 20:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Karatas IzmirTurkey 1900s.jpg

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karatas IzmirTurkey 1900s.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Ken Griffey, Jr. - Mike Harkey - Jack McDowell - Mike Remlinger.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ken Griffey, Jr. - Mike Harkey - Jack McDowell - Mike Remlinger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Victory at Sea - title card.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Victory at Sea - title card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Margarita Gralia.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Margarita Gralia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

UAwiki (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Old map of Ceuta

Hi Jbarta, it's really a pity the low quality of the image. As you can see in the source file, it comes from here. It could be possible to get partial screenshots, but I'd be unable to join them all. Would it be possible to do it provided that I send you the partial screenshots? Many thanks anyway --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 07:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

I saw that source and it's not very high resolution to start with. I think our copy was cropped from that, then blown up by a factor of three or so. Blowing it up doesn't increase the resolution, it just makes the image bigger. In other words, it doesn't do a whole lot. The source file from mcu.es is not very high resolution, but seems to be the highest available. I guess I was just engaging in wishful thinking in that maybe somewhere there actually is a very high resolution tif copy of that image lying around somewhere. – JBarta (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Don Cherry and Tony Daniels.jpg

With all due respect, your edit does not make much sense. Yes, it's arguably a watermark. However, given its size and location, the mark will undoubtedly be dealt with by cropping it out. By insisting on using what you subjectively believe to be the "correct" tag (very debatable, by the way), the image is now in an endless and growing queue of 52,000+ files with the watermark tag, and experience shows that it is unlikely to ever be revised to have the watermark removed. Moreover, given the fairly straightforward nature of the necessary revision, it is tremendously unhelpful to be clogging up the watermark backlog with simple crop requests. However, if we use the crop tag, there is a much smaller backlog, and a larger team of contributors who are capable of dealing with crops, and the image is actually likely to get the attention it needs. By insisting that we use the watermark tag for simple crops, on the debatable grounds that it is the "correct" tag, you're simply ensuring that the images in question are far less likely to get fixed, and also making it more likely that images that really need the watermark tag get lost in the growing backlog. Sorry if I come across as combative, but I get frustrated when form trumps substance. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I understand your reasoning, but a watermark is a watermark and should be tagged {{watermark}}... period. If you're in a hurry to get a watermark removed, post it to the Graphics Lab here or here instead of tagging it incorrectly. That said, I removed the watermark so at least as far as this image is concerned it's no longer an issue. – JBarta (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I would also comment that the image was not used in any articles... so watermark or not, it really doesn't matter. In addressing the backlog of watermarks, one of the methods of prioritization is that the watermarked images that are generally addressed first are the ones that appear in the most articles or get the most views. I would ALSO comment that a while back I attempted to address this whole watermarking business at the upload point by strengthening and clarifying the wording of guidelines, etc... but other editors seemed more interested in doing nothing rather than fixing the problem. So I have little sympathy for the huge backlog of watermarks because we have not done all we could to prevent it. – JBarta (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

First, "a watermark is a watermark and should be tagged {{watermark}}... period." isn't a rule, it isn't supported anywhere by policy or guidelines, and you adding "period" to the end of your claim does not make it any more true. I've explained in some detail why your edit was a problem, and your personal opinion that "a watermark is a watermark" does not address any of the issues I raised.

Second, your statement "the image was not used in any articles... so watermark or not, it really doesn't matter" is problematic on so many levels. The Commons does not exist solely to serve Wikipedia - it is a stand-alone repository used by countless types of users. This notion that we don't need to solve problems because an image isn't used on Wikipedia is inconsistent with the whole rationale for this project. And it also ignores the fact that uncropped images such as this one are less likely to be used by a Wikipedia project until they are fixed. This is not a good rationale for your edit.

Third, your statement "little sympathy for the huge backlog of watermarks because we have not done all we could to prevent it" is equally troubling. The fact that you are unconcerned with the backlog because nobody agreed with you in some past discussion is a really inappropriate reason for you to make an edit like this one.

Fourth, pointing to the Graphics Lab is not an excuse to toss something into an endless backlog. There is a difference between never getting something done, having it done in a reasonable amount of time, and needing it done as a rush. Just because this wasn't a case for the last category does not automatically means it should stew in the first category.

While I thank you for removing the watermark, please remember that it's your own personal opinion as to which tag is correct, and in this case had I not complained about your initial edit, this image would have been stuck in purgatory. That's not a good solution, and your rationale for it is unhelpful. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll respond to your third statement. It's not that "nobody agreed with (me)"... most agreed with me. The problem was that editors were more interested in arguing and debating and prattling on over minor issues than actually getting it done. So nothing got done and I walked away in disgust. Rather than making argument with me over this image and this issue, perhaps you can actually DO something to reduce the problem. Maybe you'll have better luck than I. – JBarta (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough. I still don't think it's a valid reason for switching a tag, but I sympathise and I agree with you that it is an important issue - and I have more insight into your frustration. Can you provide a link to the discussion? I'd like to look at that. In the meantime, thank you again for removing the watermark, which at the end of the day is all that matters. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't remember where or when and I really don't feel like trying to find it. The jist of the problem is that some uploaders feel entitled to include a watermark on their images because it's not made perfectly clear on upload that not only are watermarks an improper method of attribution, but they will be removed. Some uploaders feel watermarks are optional (I think the term Commons uses is that they are "discouraged"), or that they can wish for any sort of attribution they want... and they want a watermark. Commons needs an unambiguous policy of no watermarks that is made clear from the moment of upload and is consistent through the guidelines. This message should be aimed at those who deliberately upload watermarked images while not scaring away things like flickr transfers that already contain watermarks. Good luck. – JBarta (talk)
Perfect example of the problem. This dear sweet uploader has just created hours of work for other Wikipedia editors while almost certainly thinking he has done nothing wrong... because of OUR inability to be clear on the issue of watermarks. You really want to do something useful around here? Fix this. – JBarta (talk) 15:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I've invited the uploader to share his thoughts here so we might get his perspective. – JBarta (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I actually do seem to recall a fairly recent discussion at the VP or somewhere about watermarks, and I do remember it getting stuck in the quagmire of unnecessary details. It is unfair to uploaders, because we are effectively misleading them. I agree with you. Let me give this some thought. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Update: It seems the uploader in question has indeed uploaded watermarked images deliberately as advertising for his website... and intends to upload even more. Keep in mind I'm not in support of any punitive actions against this uploader. Many of his images are potentially useful and why single him out? I am in support of making Common's watermark policy firmer and more consistent. Once that's done we can take action against uploaders who run afoul of our newly unambiguous guidelines. Until then we would just be punishing others for our own shortcomings. – JBarta (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
One of the watermarked images has been nominated for deletion. – JBarta (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I pointed all deletion discussions regarding this uploader's files to one common request. – JBarta (talk) 23:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
That deletion discussion aside, isn't the first step trying to get Commons:Watermarks approved as policy? It's hard having these discussions about preventing uploads with watermarks without first having policy to back it up. Skeezix1000 (talk) 00:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm surprised you would ask such a question as I though it was perfectly clear. At any rate, yes, you are correct. That said, there is another point of view floating around that was expressed here in response to an even bigger problem here at Commons (misuse and overuse of "own work"). The view basically suggests we should place as few obstacles as possible in front of uploaders and concentrate more on fixing bad uploads rather than preventing them. – JBarta (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's not obvious or clear. It doesn't seem to be anybody's priority at the moment. I think two or three of us working together could get it done. And I would ignore that obnxious comment about our collective laziness. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

hi

I only just notice your question at the FX lab. I place it manually. There are some tools you could use, the image mapping tool I think it might be somewhere in preferences, but it is designed for something else. Penyulap 22:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Fellatio.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fellatio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Conti| 19:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Expo Pink Floyd - Organ.jpg

Unless there's some weird caching bug, File:Expo Pink Floyd - Organ.jpg still has a watermark. Please restore the template acoordingly. Andy Mabbett (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

You are correct, there's a "weird caching bug". It's an intermittant but longstanding issue with the Wikimedia software where images don't update imediately. The watermark has been removed, everything is as it should be and the software will catch up eventually.
Any image can be seen in its current version regardless of any thumbnail generation issues by appending ?action=purge to the filename...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Expo_Pink_Floyd_-_Organ.jpg?action=purge
– JBarta (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I had purged, but still se the watermark. Andy Mabbett (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
When the wiki software is acting up, you must purge the image file itself. Purging pages with the image on it (such as the image description page) doesn't normally work. – JBarta (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Images with watermarks

Howdy. Some of the images you are adding to Category:Uploads by Microtoerisme with watermarks don't actually have watermarks. I removed them prior to you adding the category. I don't think it is a big number, but I just figured I'd let you know.--Rockfang (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I knew a few didn't have watermarks. I just didn't bother to go through and pick out those few. – JBarta (talk) 21:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

File:John Grant.jpg

Hello! The flickr link has a higher resolution image (2663 x 2153) and we normally upload this highest resolution. I was gonna upload it now but noticed that you have taken some efforts in editing the image and removing the green light. Can you please upload the higher res image with your editing? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I normally do, but in this case I didn't upload it to Commons and I didn't check if it was the highest resolution available when I made further edits. If it's any consolation to you, the image is of reasonably high resolution as it is. – JBarta (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Also, if it's not immediately apparent, Nagualdesign made a few edits himself before uploading it from Flickr. So even if I did check for a higher resolution, I probably still would have left it. In other words, it's all Nagualdesign's fault... that old dirty bastard.... – JBarta (talk) 05:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I personally don't mind this resolution either. I was just worried if some bot comes and adds the higher res file. (There is such bot, isn't it? It also adds EXIF data from the source file.) Hence thought of informing you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
If there is such a bot I would think it's smart enough to NOT upload over an edited file. – JBarta (talk) 05:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
You know what? He did upload the highest resolution... he just cropped it a little before uploading. What a swell guy ;-) – JBarta (talk) 05:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Aahhh! That right! Anyways... we can always revert that bot if it does anything we don't like. Not to worry. Have a nice day! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Roosevelt20.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Roosevelt20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Khazar2Commons (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks !

Thanks for fixing templates on images I've fiddled with, I often don't have the time or patience for the paperwork, it is nice to see that you helped out there. Thank you. Penyulap 13:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

La lalalalalalalalalalala.... ;-) – JBarta (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

How to Remove Timestamp?

Hello! I recently found you removed the timestamp from a photo of Zifeng Plaza. I don't know know how to remove timestamp. Could you teach me? Thanks very much!--Jack No1 (中文/English) (talk) 09:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Posters covering a building near Lynchburg to advertise a Downie Bros. circus.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Posters covering a building near Lynchburg to advertise a Downie Bros. circus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 12:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Maxxl2/notes

Can you please come to my defence here? This is going beyond bullying. Fry1989 eh? 23:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I would advise you calm down and just stay out of that. Don't post another thing there. Quite honestly, I would hope you have more useful things to do than get fired up in such petty and childish bickering. I would also suggest that instead of looking to others to change their behavior (which they usually won't) you instead change your behavior (which you can). It seems to me you have plenty of room for change and improvement... which may actually help you in dealings with others, as opposed to endless petty bickering which will not. – JBarta (talk) 23:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quote of the day

Agreed 100% russavia (talk) 07:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Photo Edit

Hi. I was wondering if you can fix some of this issues in this photo. Some of those issues are the reflection in the sunglasses, re-cropping and noise reduction among others. Do you think you can help? -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 13:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I reduced the reflections in his glasses and made a nice crop suitable for an infobox. Unfortunately, once noise gets into an image the only way to remove it is by blurring... which makes things worse IMO. So, I gave it a very slight blur which made me feel like I was at least trying to do something about it. Even with a little noise, it's a fine picture. Hope that helps. – JBarta (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

AN/U

Please explain why you have collapsed this discussion without it being resolved. I want that IB and as I said I'm not going away until I get it, I'll start a new discussion if I have to. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I simply collapsed it so that the sections are easier to see and manage. You have to admit it was quite a long page. It has nothing to do with resolving anything or trying to make anyone go away (though it probably would be beneficial if a few people stopped posting so much). You can always add to any section if you feel the need. – JBarta (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, thank you. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
It should be undone. People might mistakenly believe that the discussions had been closed. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I suppose people can be mistaken about a lot of things. Normally when a discussion is "closed" it says this discussion is closed. What you see there is a simple collapse template as is often used (sometimes even in articles) to collapse large sections of whatever to make the page more managable. Nothing sinister here, I promise. – JBarta (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Franco1.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Franco1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Franco1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fassi.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fassi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fassi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zoubeida.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zoubeida.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zoubeida.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mokri.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mokri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mokri.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tores.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tores.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tores.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


Photo

Saludos compañero!!! Te pido un favor podrías recortarme esta foto para que se viera mejor y mas ampliada la aliniación del Real Zaragoza. Tomate tu tiempo y gracias!!! File:Aliniacion Real Zaragoza.JPG --Campeones 2008 (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Cropped. I hope that's what you were looking for. – JBarta (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

GRACIAS!!!! Cuidate. --Campeones 2008 (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Julian Carroll 2013.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Julian Carroll 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sihanaka, 1890-1910.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sihanaka, 1890-1910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Score Beethoven (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Famille royale et chefs de Rurutu.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Famille royale et chefs de Rurutu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Score Beethoven (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Gold coin with the image of Khosrau II.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gold coin with the image of Khosrau II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oyakmohsen (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1985-079-31, Verhaftung von Dönitz, Speer und Jodl.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1985-079-31, Verhaftung von Dönitz, Speer und Jodl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 14:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Ayuda

Saludos otra vez!!! Me podrías enviar un mensaje o algo asi para saber como recortar o ampliar imagenes??? No debe de ser muy dificil y asi ya no te molesto mas, gracias por todo!!! --Campeones 2008 (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Yishuguanquanjing.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yishuguanquanjing.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Yishuguanquanjing.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Mys 721tx (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:LDX 5350 副本.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:LDX 5350 副本.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:LDX 5350 副本.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Mys 721tx (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:GetAttachment VA Hospital, Shreveport.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GetAttachment VA Hospital, Shreveport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Courcelles 16:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Manthan Prakash Manur.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Manthan Prakash Manur.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 22:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


File:Simão.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Simão.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Moros y Cristianos 06:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Fanny Stevenson.jpg

Can you create your version as a derivative file like File:Fanny Stevenson (restored).jpg with the proper accreditation? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Done. – JBarta (talk) 07:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I commented here. – JBarta (talk) 07:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Caponer/JustinAWilcox

Hey Jbarta,

This is Caponer--I use my real name on Wikimedia Commons as I've uploaded a lot of my own photography on here. I continue to edit under Caponer on Wikipedia. Thanks again for uploading the photos--I'm still working on categorizing and writing text for each, and of course, placing them in Wikipedia articles. Kudos on a job well done! -- Justin.A.Wilcox (talk) 20:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Ah, ok... – JBarta (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Commons talk:Graphic Lab#Automatic archival of Graphic Lab requests

Hi Jabarta,

you recommended me to "just do it". This and that is what is happening when I'm trying to "just" implement automatic archiving Face-sad.svg.

I put work into it and set up automatic archiving in all COM:GL workshops, and Penyulap is rendering my work useless by prohibiting me to replace {{resolved}} with {{section resolved}} which has essentially the same meaning but is recognized by User:SpBot whereas the former is not. That was exactly what I was afraid of – Penyulap blocking my work. *sigh* --Patrick87 (talk) 04:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

It's good that you can/have set it up. Penyulap making mischief is a different problem that can be addressed later. That said, I personally would MUCH rather see a simple "resolved" tag as is used in the en Graphic Lab. It's simple, it works great and no one has an issue with it. Is there no way to set up archiving so that it will recognize "resolved" rather than "section resolved"? Recognizing both might even be best of all. – JBarta (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
You have to negotiate that with de:Benutzer:Euku. User:SpBot is his bot and is the only bot available for archiving resolved requests which is available across Wikipedias and also the only bot for the job available on Commons currently. For consistency Euku proposed to use {{section resolved}} instead of {{resolved}} as we do on German Wikipedia (see de:WP:GWS) and everywhere else SpBot is used and I'm basically with him. It works perfectly on German Wikipedia and I assume after the initial migration it will feel as natural as the {{resolved}} template does now in Commons GL. Additionally you might have noticed that the {{resolved}}/{{unresolved}} thing is currently a specialty which is only used on English graphics lab.
Anyway I'm afraid you're expressing your preferences a little late – exactly this was what I asked on Commons talk:GL were you recommended to "just implement it". So did I! --Patrick87 (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, we will try to allow it to work in the Photography workshop. Glad you got it done. – JBarta (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Few questions:
  • Does it also mark inactive sections "Stale" after a period of time? If yes, after how long?
  • Does it then archive those stale sections? If yes, after how long?
  • If I read it right, it archives "section resolved" sections after 30 days? If so, isn't that a bit long? I think 3 days is fine... up to 10 as a compromise... but 30?
– JBarta (talk) 06:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Feel free to discuss this on the GL's talk page. As soon as there is consent Face-wink.svg I'll be happy to change the time. Anyway, as currently resolved requests sit there forever unless someone archives them (and this was done approx. every three months at best), I think 30 days is already much of an improvement. --Patrick87 (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how I managed that but I somehow over-read that part about stale sections (e.g. the first two bullet points) and only answered the last one. To answer the first two bullet points: No, SpBot does no such "stale" tagging. As nobody showed interest in the implementation of DyceBot (who's doing the job on enwiki) on Commons Talk:GL#Automatic archival of Graphic Lab requests I didn't further follow this possibility and implemented the solution that was already available. --Patrick87 (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Dunham Iris LC-DIG-ppmsca-05800.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dunham Iris LC-DIG-ppmsca-05800.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

howcheng {chat} 02:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pedro II of Brazil by Rugendas 1846.jpg

Could you try to do what you did to File:Pedro II of Brazil by Rugendas 1846.jpg using the file I just uploaded? The very first file I took it from an old scanner I had. The last file has come from a better scanner. P.S.: Cropping the white borders, of course. --Lecen (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually, your old scanner took a better scan in my opinion. No better result (and probably a worse result) would be had by messing with that new scan. – JBarta (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok, then. Thanks a lot! --Lecen (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

--83.189.166.96 00:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)--83.189.166.96 00:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)== File:Nicky Barnes, NYC booking photo.jpg ==

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nicky Barnes, NYC booking photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:CHFST1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CHFST1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

heb [T C E] 09:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Request

Hi, Jbarta. How have you been? Once you made a few color adjustments into this picture which became this. I wonder if you could do the same to this picture? The file is located here. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Dear Jbarta,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ravana's virtuous daughter-in-law Sulochana receives the head of her husband Indrajit, who has been killed by Rama (bazaar art, 1910's) (edit).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ravana's virtuous daughter-in-law Sulochana receives the head of her husband Indrajit, who has been killed by Rama (bazaar art, 1910's) (edit).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ravana's virtuous daughter-in-law Sulochana receives the head of her husband Indrajit, who has been killed by Rama (bazaar art, 1910's) (edit).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paraninfo unl.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paraninfo unl.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paraninfo unl.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

File:María García Esperón.jpeg

Pay attention to copyright
File:María García Esperón.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 08:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:TvBlockKuzushi Box.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TvBlockKuzushi Box.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gazebo (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Hana Fischerova.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hana Fischerova.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flickrworker (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Al Piechota Davenport.JPG

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Al Piechota Davenport.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jaranda wat's sup 15:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Al Piechota Davenport.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Al Piechota Davenport.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Bony.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.64.241.13 06:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)



Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.