User talk:FieldMarine

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
English: Welcome to the Commons, FieldMarine!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 03:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Contents

Useful links & templates[edit]

Image:PPSh-41 Submachinegun (Fallujah, Iraq).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  Kanonkas(talk) 19:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Christ United Methodist Church (Chincoteague Island, Virginia) Obligue View 02.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:Christ United Methodist Church (Chincoteague Island, Virginia) Obligue View 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Redundant?[edit]

[1]. [2]: How is Category:Historical markers redundant? I don't see any category remaining that would imply this being a historical marker. - Jmabel ! talk 21:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

[3], [4] ditto. - Jmabel ! talk 21:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Greetings. When I started the project of diffusing files in Category:Historical markers, Category:Plaques, & Category:Plaques in the United States, the overwhelming majority of files categorized as “historical markers” where of the freestanding type like this Image:Chipley Falling Waters SP plaque01.jpg. The rest were simply labeled as plaques as you can see here Category:Plaques in Florida. My thought was to keeping the free standing historical markers as a separate group, because these seem to be of a similar type. I wrestled with what to do about the “wall mounted” historical plaques & I think they should probably be separated from the more general “plaques” category, such as creating Category:Historical plaques and signs in the United States. The current "Histroical markers" could be a subcat of these. Since there is the potential for thousands of these (historical plaques & markers), we do need a good taxonomy & your thoughts on this would be most appreciated. IMHO, they should be separated by county and/or state at a minimu. Also, your help in sorting them would also be appreciated. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not so concerned with what taxonomy you end up with: I'm more concerned that once you removed all relation to historical markers, it's going to be hard to find these again to get them into the new category. Of course, if you've moved them all into "plaques" categories, I guess you can find them there. - Jmabel ! talk 04:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Sergeant John Basilone by C. C. Beal.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Carlos Norris? Seriously?[edit]

FieldMarine, why did you redirect to ? Kelly (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Apologies if the "seriously" bothered you, no offense meant. I was just surprised to see the category labeled that way...I think I knew his real name was Carlos but never saw him referred to that way - it was kind of like seeing R. Lee Ermey referred to as "Ronald". :) I think "Chuck" is better because the common usage seems to be what is used here.
If you don't mind me asking, are you actually a Devil Dog? I'm Air Force, but I attended the Advanced Course at the Camp Pendleton SNCOA a couple years ago (on an exchange program) and got to know a lot of great gunnies. Kelly (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, FieldMarine!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

File:NASA SP-4301 Venture Into Space- Early Years of Goddard Space Flight Center.pdf[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 01:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

File:X-15- Extending the Frontiers of Flight (NASA SP-2007-562) 1.pdf[edit]

Hi there. Just a remark, for future uploads: if the new file is only an improved version of the existing one, you could have simply uploaded over the existing file (there is a link "Upload a new version" on the image pages). This way, no duplicate, no need to delete. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Marines_during_elections_in_Fallujah_001.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marines_during_elections_in_Fallujah_001.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 21:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello FieldMarine! In this case it is not sufficient to update the licence tag. If you have found images on official US-websites please state the URL where you have found this file in the "source"-field. United States Marine Corps is too vague. Please add this, otherwise the file can be deleted. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Again:
Your comment stated on the talk page of this file makes me realizing that unfortunately you haven't understood the problem. Here is the passage that you have demanded: COM:L#License_information. Please read this page carefully.

Have fun. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Demanded? Please continue this dialogue on the file disussion page. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 06:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Category talk:Badges of rank[edit]

Hallo, I would appreciate your military expertise (and helping hand) in Category talk:Badges of rank. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Marines during elections in Fallujah 001.jpg[edit]

Hi FieldMarine,
Please tell me where you have taken this image from (book, webside (if yes which one),...)
thanks --D-Kuru (talk) 22:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I got the picture directly from Marine cameramen serving with 1st Marine Regiment (United States) in Fallujah while on official duty. FieldMarine (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Do you may know his name? "United States Marine Corps" as source should maybe expanded, because usually there is a webside where you can find such images. I'm not sure if {{PD-USGov-Military-Marines}} is the correct licence, because such images usually get released with a PD note. I don't know the american law good enough to say that every image, taken by us soldiers, are immediately in the PD or they just became PD if they get released with the PD-release-note. Is there any possibility to contact the author so that we can be sure that this image is PD (and that the author has agreed that his image is in the PD if this image would be copyrighted)?
I know that it's a lot of trouble for just one image, but because there is no weblink (which would proof that this image is no copyvio) we need some kind of additional document that this is no copyviofile.
--D-Kuru (talk) 01:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


Category:Locator maps of cities in Virginia[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Locator maps of cities in Virginia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--Nyttend (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment; would you offer a response to my response? Nyttend (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Terrier-Orion_rocket_launched_from_Poker_Flat_Research_Range,_Alaska_001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Terrier-Orion_rocket_launched_from_Poker_Flat_Research_Range,_Alaska_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

132.199.211.30 15:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Image renaming[edit]

I saw that you tagged a image for rename but your not on the checkpage for the bot (Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage) Please go to the the talk page and put your name up for approval so that the bot can automatically rename your request instead of waiting for someone else on that list to confirm for you. Betacommand 01:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:2d MEB - Task Force Leatherneck insignia (transparent background) 02.png[edit]

Hello,

You don't need to upload several versions of the same file. The software takes care of that itself. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

It's actually different resolutions for different uses. FieldMarine (talk) 00:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Marines_during_elections_in_Fallujah_001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marines_during_elections_in_Fallujah_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

132.199.211.17 18:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Can I have you opinion[edit]

Hi FieldMarine can I ask you opinion on the move of Category:United States Marine Corps Silent Drill Platoon to Category:Silent Drill Platoon ceremonies of the United States Marine Corps, personally I think it verbose and ill judged, with no understanding of the subject and what is being depicted. However it may be me who is mistaken and this new name more properly reflects the topic and images. Thanks, I would really appreciate and value your opinion on this.KTo288 (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)edited to reflect changed circumstancesKTo288 (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, but I'm on deployment with infrequent access to the Internet. What you say makes sense to me. Semper Fi, FieldMarine (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 96aad3d2ef5a941ad14f20c16b1676bb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

MLAS change[edit]

Hi FieldMarine, would you please justify your change to Category:Max Launch Abort System? As I stated in my revert, MLAS is part of the Ares rocket system, not an intrinsic part of Orion. Huntster (t @ c) 01:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

The MLAS system is intrinisic to the Orion crew module & that is why it is included as a category. Thanks, FieldMarine (talk) 01:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Then would you say Category:Orion Launch Abort System should also be changed to Orion? Huntster (t @ c) 02:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm less familiar with that system. How about including both the Ares & the Orion cats? FieldMarine (talk) 02:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, the Orion Launch Abort System is basically the same thing as MLAS, just a different method (MLAS is somewhat more advanced in design, OLAS is just a modern version of what was used on Apollo). I think I would avoid putting them in both...use one or the other. The reason why I suggest placing them in the Ares category is because neither has any real bearing on the operation of the Orion module; both would be used only during ascent as part of the Ares rocket operation. Huntster (t @ c) 03:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Ignazio DeFrancisci 002.jpg[edit]

Excuse me, but this image looks way unusual on my monitor, and frankly it looks like it's corrupted. Is that right?? Tabercil (talk) 03:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

I've speedy-deleted both corrupted images so it's clear for you to reupload under the same name (unless you think that'll jinx it <G>). Tabercil (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

"RV UNNECESSARY & INCORRECT INFO"[edit]

We can debate the necessity of the information you removed, but it is NOT incorrect. Indeed, it comes direct from the official information provided by the US Army Institute of Heraldry, and is referenced in the manuals cited. SSG Cornelius Seon (US Army, Retired) (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

It is not just an Army award, it is for all services. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 05:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Actually, we are both right, but an explanation is required.
AR 600–8–22. dtd 11 December 2006; Chapter 3, Section 16 says the following:
a. The Air Medal was established by Executive Order 9158, 11 May 1942 as amended by Executive Order 9242–A, 11 September 1942.
b. The Air Medal is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the U.S. Army, will have distinguished himself or herself by meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight. Awards may be made to recognize single acts of merit or heroism, or for meritorious service as described below.
c. Awards may be made for acts of heroism in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party, which are of a lesser degree than required for award of the Distinguished Flying Cross.
d. Awards may be made for single acts of meritorious achievement, involving superior airmanship, which are of a lesser degree than required for award of the Distinguished Flying Cross, but nevertheless were accomplished with distinction beyond that normally expected.
e. Awards for meritorious service may be made for sustained distinction in the performance of duties involving regular and frequent participation in aerial flight for a period of at least 6 months. In this regard, accumulation of a specified number of hours and missions will not serve as the basis for award of the Air Medal. Criteria in paragraph c, above, concerning conditions of conflict are applicable to award of the Air Medal for meritorious service.
f. Award of the Air Medal is primarily intended to recognize those personnel who are on current crewmember or noncrewmember flying status which requires them to participate in aerial flight on a regular and frequent basis in the performance of their primary duties. However, it may also be awarded to certain other individuals whose combat duties require regular and frequent flying in other than a passenger status, or individuals who perform a particularly noteworthy act while performing the function of a crewmember, but who are not on flying status as prescribed in AR 600–106. These individuals must make a discernible contribution to the operational land combat mission or to the mission of the aircraft in flight. Examples of personnel whose combat duties require them to fly include those in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy and those directly involved in airborne command and control of combat operations. Involvement in such activities, normally at the brigade/group level and below, serves only to establish eligibility for award of the Air Medal; the degree of heroism, meritorious achievement or exemplary service determines who should receive the award. Awards will not be made to individuals who use air transportation solely for the purpose of moving from point to point in a combat zone.
g. Numerals, starting with 2 will be used to denote second and subsequent awards of the Air Medal.
To properly interpret Paragraph b, the medal was created by and for the Army, and was originally “…awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the U.S. Army, will have distinguished himself or herself by meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight. Awards may be made to recognize single acts of merit or heroism, or for meritorious service….” It was extended to the US Air Force in 1947 when the Air Corps was carved from the Army, and established as a separate service under the Department of Defense.
DOD Manual 1348.33-M, dtd September 12, 1996 w-Change 1 dtd September 18, 2006, Appendix 1, Paragraph 1.2.24 addresses the Air Medal, and says the following:
AP1.1.2.24.1. Authorized by Executive Order 9158, "Air Medal," May 11, 1942; as amended by Executive Order 9242-A, September 11, 1942.
AP1.1.2.24.2. Awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States, subsequent to September 8, 1939, distinguishes himself or herself by heroic or meritorious achievement while participating in an aerial flight.
AP1.1.2.24.3. Subsequent to April 1974, the letter "V" may be authorized by the Navy and Marine Corps.
So, you can see the issue. Prior to 1947, the Air Medal was authorized and awarded by the Army for the Army, with the provision that other service members [Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard] were eligible for the award IF they were on an Army flight. Award Authority was extend to the Air Force in 1947 when it was carved out of the Army Air Corps, and the DOD took over Policy Authority for the medal in 1996 when it added it to DOD Manual 1348.33-M. Under that authority, Award Authority was expanded to the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, with the provision that the Coast Guard’s authority does not attach when the flight is for the Department of Transportation.
Thus, the Air Medal belongs under the DOD Category I suggested, with a consolidated explanation based on what I posted above, and auxiliary categories for each of the other five services. SSG Cornelius Seon (US Army, Retired) (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Cat Redirect: People from Boston[edit]

I note that you just added a category redirect here. I think you have it backwards -- that the active category should be People of Boston.

My reasoning is that Wiki uses the city name without the state for a short list of cities (the Associated Press list) and Boston is one of them. If you look at Category:People of the United States by city you'll see that Chicago, Los Angeles, New Orleans, among others are treated that way. I also have recently spent a fair amount of time sorting out duplicate categories -- those with and without "Massachusetts" -- for Boston. As it stands after your change, People from Boston, Massachusetts is the only category in Category:Boston that has Massachusetts included. While I don't really care which way it goes, I think you'll agree that they all ought to be the same. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 16:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Makes no difference to me. I was just following this: Category:People from Boston, Massachusetts to ensure consistency & connectivity in the wikis. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Seems to be much the same problem between WP and Commons on a number of cities. Maybe one of us will someday find the strength to redo them all, but for now, I take it it's OK with you if we use Category:People from Boston as the active category on Commons? . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 16:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for the head's up. FieldMarine (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Corrupt files[edit]

Hi, I have removed speedy deletion tags from File:Marines' Hymn.tif and File:Regimental Combat Team 3 Afghanistan logo (transparent background) 01.tif. MediaWiki software cant render thumbnails from Tiff format, but still any user can download and use them for any purpose. Of course such format is not suitable for inclusion in to articles where small thumb images are needed. -Justass (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:People of Indianapolis, Indiana[edit]

"Why was this move request from the above cat to Category:People from Indianapolis, Indiana? This seems like redundant cats? Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)"
??? Do you mean user: Okki? Greetings. Orchi (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Please see revision history of User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I did'nt know what happened there. I reverted my change. Greetings.Orchi (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Plaques, memorials, etc.[edit]

I'm still quite confused what you are up to with category changes like [5], [6], and [7] (all related to old ferries). I wouldn't usually call this a "memorial" (which suggests to me something about a person who died; you will notice that almost everything else in the category is, indeed, just that). Maybe it could be called a "historical marker"; certainly it is a "plaque" (as it was previously classified). Are there any clear criteria for the "memorial" category that would include things like this that have nothing to do with deaths? (File:Seattle - Volunteer Park - naming plaque.jpg seems OK, because it has to do with soldiers from the Spanish American War). - Jmabel ! talk 23:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree that the plaques category should be better defined. IMHO, it should only be used when the focus of the picture is the plaque itself & you should be able to read the plaque. In the cases above, it is the structure with a plaque mounted to it that is the focus of the picture. The reason I thought memorials would be a good category is because the description states it “memorializes”, and a “memorial is an object which serves as a focus of memory of something”, usually, but not always, a person or event. The “Historical marker” cat has a description, see Category:Plaques in Florida. Bottomline, I don’t feel strongly about the reclassification, so if you think it is better classified in the category “Plaques,” no problem with me. It just seemed like a memorial (structure with a plaque) to me, so that's why I choose that category. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I'll create a small category specific to these markers along the river. - Jmabel ! talk 03:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Eau Gallie Yacht Club sign 03.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Ben T. Epps 001.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ben T. Epps 001.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Rlandmann (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi FieldMarine -- just to clarify the problem here: there are only a few scenarios in which this photo could possibly be in the public domain. In each case, it's completely irrelevant when the photo was taken, only when and where it was first published.

This photo would be in the public domain if:

  • it was first published (in a book, magazine, or newspaper) prior to 1923
  • it was first published between 1923 and 1977 in a publication that had no copyright notice on it
  • it was first published between 1923 and 1964 in a publication with a valid copyright notice, but the copyright was never renewed (and therefore expired no later than 1991).

(There are actually a few more possibilities, but they're more complicated, and still require us to know when and where the photo was first published.)

If you have details of the first publication of this photo, please add them to the image description. The New Georgia Encyclopedia that you give as the source where you found the image is "Copyright 2004-2009 by the Georgia Humanities Council and the University of Georgia Press." Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I have no additional info on the photo -- I got it from the New Georgia Encyclopedia. FieldMarine (talk) 19:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

People by name vs. Families[edit]

Hi. FYI, I've reverted your recent change to Category:David_Price (baseball). Those family history categories should be reserved for people that are known to actually be family - not just groups of people with the same last name. Is there some precedent for what you did there? Wknight94 talk 14:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The category is for any person with the surname Price as is all the categories that say ""XXX family". They don't necessarily have to be related. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
In Category:Family histories by surname, there is a mixup between surnames and families, such as category:Smith (surname) versus category:Kennedy family. --Foroa (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm taking this to the discussion page here. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

File:A Watchful Eye by David Price 1993.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:A Watchful Eye by David Price 1993.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


File:At The Airport by William King 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:At The Airport by William King 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- fetchcomms 02:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Alumni cats[edit]

Hi there. I have taken some time to convert alumni cats from "XXX alumni" to "Alumni of XXX" (the job is not finished for the US), because I have been asked to do so: apparently the simpler syntactic structure (without inversion, with "of") is preferred on this international project, because it is more easily understandable by non native speakers (and it's still correct English). I would be very grateful if you could stop reverting this job. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Why are we changing these cats when they match nicely to wikipedia as "XXX alumni"? If you feel the move is necessary, I recommend we take this to the discussion board first for community comment. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Commons is not an extension of the English Wikipedia, as you know. It is a multi-language project, mainly using English but maintained and used by people of various nationalities and languages, which has lead to some specific naming choices, as I told you. Currently, the naming of categories for US universities is an exception compared to the naming scheme used for all other universities in the world. This naming scheme is justified by the rationale I've explained to you. Please allow me to rephrase your own suggestion (without any kind of animosity): if you think the current rationale and naming scheme should be discussed/changed, please propose your counter-arguments to the community (there's COM:CFD) before making systematic changes. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 05:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
As an international project with many languages, we need to be more strict with the (few clear) naming rules. The basic commons category naming rule states "Topic [qualifier] [Qualifier]" and certainly not the topic at the end of the name as in "xxx alumni". --Foroa (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Please don't make any more changes to this category stucture until we have consensus within the community. Let's take it to the discussion board. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 09:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Please checkout Commons:Categories for discussion/2010/07/Category:Alumni of the University of Alabama & add comment. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 10:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I launche a couple of renames before I noticed you message. Anyway, the Commons rules are clear on that and "alumni of xxx" is the world wide standard, so I would be very much surprised if something changes. --Foroa (talk) 10:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Admin?[edit]

BTW, have you thought about becoming an Admin yourself? I'm actively recruiting people with deep and non-controversial records on Commons, as we badly need more help.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Jim, interesting question...no one has ever asked me that before. Perhaps in a few months. I'd still like to learn some more. Thanks for asking though. Semper Fi, FieldMarine (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Also, thanks for your service as an admin...I know that can be thankless at times. FieldMarine (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I wouldn't want to admit the last to a prospective member of the group, but yes, it can be thankless, and you're welcome. We disagree about USMC War Memorial, but I appreciate very much your courtesy -- that helps balance some of the difficult ones.
A lot of Admin work is just routine clerk-work, except that the clerk has to have a little judgment to tell the straightforward ones from the curve balls -- like the two texts in the War Memorial -- this clerk's judgment was a little off there, first time through. You also have to get to know the players -- whose DR nominations can be trusted and whose need to be checked. You might start going through the daily DR lists from time to time -- both because you will learn about the process and it will get your name out in front of the voters.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Mortar Section, Weapon Platoon, B Company, 1st Battalion, 3d Marines in the Gulf War, February 1991.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

It should be deleted...it's the wrong version. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Manatees (Whaling Wall 10) by Wyland 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Manatees (Whaling Wall 10) by Wyland 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Manatees (Whaling Wall 10) by Wyland 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Note that the copyright of paintings by a modern living artist is retained by the artist unless the artist has specifically sold or licensed the copyright. One does not become the copyright holder of someone else's work by photographing it; see Commons:Derivative works. Infrogmation (talk) 00:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Industrial spaghetti dryer built by Consolidated Macaroni Machine Corporation.jpg[edit]

Gday. The source of the photograph needs to be appropriately added. If you found it in a book, then you need to identify such, if it is a family photograph, then that would be the attribution. In most cases old photographs are not source {{own}}. Your attention to the work would be useful, thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


Category discussion notification[edit]

Category discussion notification A category has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--Powers (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:County_Road_509_(Brevard_County,_Florida)[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:County_Road_509_(Brevard_County,_Florida) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Imzadi 1979  19:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:County_Road_511_(Brevard_County,_Florida)[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:County_Road_511_(Brevard_County,_Florida) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Imzadi 1979  19:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Portillo's_Hot_Dogs_(Elk_Grove_Village,_Illinois)_sign_002.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Portillo's_Hot_Dogs_(Elk_Grove_Village,_Illinois)_sign_002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 04:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Portillo's_Hot_Dogs_(Elk_Grove_Village,_Illinois)_sign_002_crop.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Portillo's_Hot_Dogs_(Elk_Grove_Village,_Illinois)_sign_002_crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

M-554[edit]

You do realize that there's no "room for growth" when

  1. M-554 only existed on paper for seven years.
  2. It no longer exists as a state highway and hasn't in five years.
  3. Road maps are categorized in a different category, not by the highway's designation.

In short, that category isn't needed on that map image. Imzadi 1979  01:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Responded on the cat deletion request page. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Henderson_House_(Stafford,_Kansas)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Henderson_House_(Stafford,_Kansas) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Nyttend (talk) 04:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Leadership_principles[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Leadership_principles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Kramer Associates (talk) 03:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Vintage Hand Operated Pasta Machine 001.jpg[edit]

Hallo FieldMarine, pardon, what are you doing here? Three different names right after each other? File:Vintage Hand Operated Pasta Machine 001.jpg Please see COM:RENAME for help how to rename files. Do not upload them again, please. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Spring_Hill_Dinosaur_(Spring_Hill,_Florida)_01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Spring_Hill_Dinosaur_(Spring_Hill,_Florida)_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Spring_Hill_Dinosaur_(Spring_Hill,_Florida)_02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Spring_Hill_Dinosaur_(Spring_Hill,_Florida)_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Category redirect discussion[edit]

Has there been a category redirect discussion on the village pump yet? WhisperToMe (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Ships_by_name_by_type[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Ships_by_name_by_type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Badzil (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File:M 554 Road Sign.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M 554 Road Sign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Imzadi 1979  04:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:M 554 road sign.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M 554 road sign.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Imzadi 1979  04:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Leaving other templates intact ...[edit]

Gday. When you are in the process of requesting that a file be considered a duplicate or not, it would be appreciated if you would leave the {{information}} template and other data on the page intact rather than removing. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Will do, thanks for the feedback. Is there a specific file you are referring too? FieldMarine (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Apartments_in_Florida[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Apartments_in_Florida has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Governor's Award for Achievement in Export from New York State - DeFrancisci Machine Corporation 1984.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Governor's Award for Achievement in Export from New York State - DeFrancisci Machine Corporation 1984.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 00:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Commons barnstar.png The Commons Barnstar
For your many image uploads, and all the rest of the work you do here. INeverCry 02:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:NATO_Medal_(United_States)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:NATO_Medal_(United_States) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Leoguana Da Vinci by Edwards & Rudden 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leoguana Da Vinci by Edwards & Rudden 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Food_quality[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Food_quality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

FAEP (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Village_halls_in_the_United_States[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Village_halls_in_the_United_States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Nyttend (talk) 03:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Withlacoochee River (Central Florida)[edit]

I see you moved three of my images of Florida State Road 50 from the Rivers of Florida category to Withlacoochee River (Central Florida). That was actually of the Little Withlacoochee River, which is a tributary of the Withlacoochee River. Do you have any plans to split the correct river off into a new category? ----DanTD (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. Should we create a new cat, or just upmerge? FieldMarine (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Not sure. A new category would make sense, but there should probably be some more images for the Little Withlacoochee. It almost makes me think I should go to the US 301 bridge over the river to grab some. ----DanTD (talk) 00:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

File:New York State Emergency Medical Services Memorial 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New York State Emergency Medical Services Memorial 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Board_for_Production_Awards_(United_States)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Board_for_Production_Awards_(United_States) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Djembayz (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Peachoid water tower (Gaffney, South Carolina) 001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peachoid water tower (Gaffney, South Carolina) 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

TY for your service[edit]

If I can ever be of any help at WP, ping me. Cheers. Le Prof (and someone who knows what/where Mount MF is… )

Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 03:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fortunato Brothers Cafe (Brooklyn, New York) 001.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fortunato Brothers Cafe (Brooklyn, New York) 001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Request submitted for the file to be deleted as it is a duplicate with incorrect metadata. Thank you! FieldMarine (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Crenshaw Hotel (Melbourne, Florida) historical marker 001.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Crenshaw Hotel (Melbourne, Florida) historical marker 001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Request submitted for the file to be deleted as it is a duplicate with incorrect metadata. Thank you! FieldMarine (talk) 16:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


--  Gazebo (talk) 08:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Delta flight 1086 from Atlanta to New York LaGuardia on 05 March 2015.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Delta flight 1086 from Atlanta to New York LaGuardia on 05 March 2015.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

This is a duplicate - I have requested deletion. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Museo Lamborghini (Sant'Agata Bolognese, Bologna, Italy) 001.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Museo Lamborghini (Sant'Agata Bolognese, Bologna, Italy) 001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)