User talk:Bogdan/Archive1

Buna ziua Bogdan

Buna ziua Bogdan, era foarte fine, daca pui pozele tale intr'o resolutie mai mare... Salutari soare 19 Aprilie 13:26

Pozele care le-am făcut deja le am doar în 1024x768. (mi se părea mai convenabil că încăpeau pe ecran ;-). O să fac pozele de acum la o rezoluţie mai mare. Bogdan 20:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your "not identified" picture

Hello Bogdan, I saw this picture and knew right away that it is Lathraea squamaria. I have added the picture to this page. --BerndH 19:52, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you. Bogdan 20:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Poze Bucureşti

Salut Bogdan! Vreau să îţi mulţumesc pentru pozele tale făcute în Bucureşti. Eu contribui la Wikinews multe ştiri despre România, şi mai ales despre Bucureşti, şi de multe ori îmi trebuie poze cu oraşul. Să ştii că m-ai ajutat mult cu pozele făcute, mai ales cea cu "blocul bizar" şi cea din centrul cu cele trei blocuri. Am folosit-o deja pe Wikinews. Dacă ai mai putea să faci poze cu Bucureştiul - orice, străzi frumoase, locuri cunoscute, etc, ar fi tare apreciat. Încăodată mulţumesc, Ronline 14:16, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:White_flower.jpg

Hello Bogdan,

This is a Alliaria petiolata:

• Google images>>Alliaria petiolata

- -Pixeltoo 18:37, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Merci. Bogdan 22:19, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Pine cone crop bgiu.jpg

Hello Bogdan - this is male cones of Pinus nigra, I have indexed it there - MPF 16:15, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you. Bogdan 20:28, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Unidentified flower bgiu 01.jpg

This photo shows Vicia grandiflora - compare [1]. An anonymous user before thought he could identify it as Tetragonolobus maritimus, but I am sure, he is wrong. --Franz Xaver 13:08, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you. Bogdan 18:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sonchus arvensis susai bgiu.jpg

Hello Bogdan! This photo shows Sonchus oleraceus. Sonchus arvensis should have glandular hairs on involucral bracts and upper part oft stem - see this one. Moreover, also colour of leaves is more glaucous in Sonchus oleraceus - as is your image.
I also found another photo Image:Sonchus arvensis bgiu.jpg which probably is some Hieracium species. This one will be difficult to determine to species. Generally it is easier to determine plants, if some information is given where the photo was taken - as you did in the latter photo. Such an information, however, is missing in some others of your photos. Are all of your photos from Romania? Best wishes --Franz Xaver 06:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes. Most of them are either in Bucharest or in the hills south of the Carpathians (in Dâmboviţa county). I'll try put information about them from now on. Bogdan 08:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Big yellow flower bgiu.jpg

Hi again! This plant is Tragopogon, probably Tragopogon pratensis. However, there are two species in Romania which I do not know well. The first one is Tragopogon brevirostris, which extends from Ukraine and southern Russia into eastern Romania, and probably is rare there. The second one is Tragopogon floccosus which according to "Flora Europaea" grows on river-sands in the Danube floodplain. Probably the photo was taken in a different region of Romania? Regards --Franz Xaver 07:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It was taken in Bucharest, which is about 60 km north of the Danube. Bogdan 08:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

OK, so neither Tragopogon floccosus nor T. brevirostris is very likely. And the plant actually looks like T. pratensis - so it is T. pratensis. Cheers --Franz Xaver 11:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Fabaceae vicia bgiu.jpg

Hi Bogdan! This images shows Lathyrus tuberosus --Franz Xaver 18:11, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Some plants

Hello Bogdan! You need not worry about Image:Vicia cracca bgiu.jpg - this really is Vicia cracca. Moreover, Image:Unknown plant 01 bgiu.jpg is Aristolochia clematitis. Did you take Image:Chrysanthemum yellow flower.jpg in spring? If yes, I think it is Senecio vernalis.

Yes, I took it in April. Bogdan 4 July 2005 16:13 (UTC)

I will check this. To some others of your "plante neidentificate" I have some ideas. I already have put these into the right family categories. You can read my comments if you look at file history. Cheers --Franz Xaver 4 July 2005 14:16 (UTC)

Now I saw your photos Image:Sambucus nigra flori bgiu.jpg and Image:Sambucus nigra flori 02 bgiu.jpg. These actually are Sambucus ebulus, not Sambucus nigra. Antheres of Sambucus nigra are yellow, not purple. Also shape of leaves is different and S. nigra always has a woody stem. Your first photo shows colour of antheres very well. In your second photo this colour is quite pale, rather pink than purple. However, this plant also clearly is Sambucus ebulus, because of leaf shape and plant habitus. Until now, photos of Sambucus ebulus were missing. So, we also have got this species. Regards --Franz Xaver 4 July 2005 14:38 (UTC)

Great. Thanks. Bogdan 4 July 2005 16:13 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan, I started from Bulgarian article on Sambucus ebulus having picture named Sambucus nigra. Luckily being persistent I've reached this explanation here but the name is still confusing. Could you either put these comments on the image pages, or even better re-upload the images under correct name. Cheers, Zlatko + ^(talk) 22:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Is it possible for you to check the plant on Image:Arctium lappa bgiu.jpg? To tell from the photo alone, also other species of Arctium are possible, i.e. Arctium nemorosum and A. minus. However, it is not difficult to distinguish A. lappa in the field: In A. lappa the petiole ("leaf stalk") is solid, whereas A. minus and A. nemorosum have a hollow petiole - see [2] and [3]. A photo of this detail would be nice. Cheers --Franz Xaver 4 July 2005 14:50 (UTC)

I checked and the petiole was solid. I have a photo with the petiole but it's not helpful as the details can't be distinguised.

However, I took another pic of the same plant which now has flowers: Image:Arctium lappa 02 bgiu.jpg, which look quite different from Nemorosum Bogdan

I did not see this message before. Yes, I agree now, this plant really is Arctium lappa. Thanks for checking the characters. Regards. --Franz Xaver 17:55, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Actually, A. lappa is the only member of the Arctium family that grows in Romania. Bogdan 4 July 2005 16:13 (UTC)

Sorry, that I have to oppose to this statement: According to "Flora Europaea", in Romania five species of Arctium can be found, i.e. Arctium lappa, A. minus, A. nemorosum, A. pubens, and A. tomentosum. If you check [4], searching for the genus name Arctium, you will receive a list of taxon names mentioned in "Flora Europaea" - accepted names as well as synonyms. For accepted names also a list of countries of occurrence is provided, where "Rm" means Romania.
It is very likely that your plant is A. lappa. Nevertheless, we should try to be on the safe side. Only A. lappa and A. tomentosum have solid petioles. Because of the size of the leaves I do not think that A. tomentosum is possible. However, A. nemorosum could be possible. So the petioles would bring about an unambiguous identification. Best wishes --Franz Xaver 4 July 2005 17:13 (UTC)

Thanks for the link to Flora Europaea. I'll check the petioles when I'll get back there (in a couple of weeks). Bogdan 5 July 2005 08:57 (UTC)

Image:Purple scented plant bgiu.jpg is Prunella vulgaris --Franz Xaver 4 July 2005 17:21 (UTC)

Hi, Bogdan! Meanwhile I checked Image:Chrysanthemum yellow flower.jpg. It really is Senecio vernalis. --Franz Xaver 6 July 2005 21:24 (UTC)
Just verified: Image:Planta prundul dambovitei.jpg is Tussilago farfara --Franz Xaver 7 July 2005 13:51 (UTC)
I determined also Image:Unknown pink flowers bgiu.jpg. It is Ononis arvensis. --Franz Xaver 7 July 2005 17:24 (UTC)
Image:Pale pink flower bgiu.jpg is Lavatera thuringiaca --Franz Xaver 7 July 2005 18:50 (UTC)

Hello Bogdan! It is possible that Image:Unknown yellow flower 02 bgiu.jpg shows Tragopogon hayekii. This is another species of Tragopogon I do not know very well. In "Flora Europaea" it is described to occur in Central Romania and Macedonia (and where else?) and to be distinguished from Tragopogon pratensis subsp. pratensis (your other Image:Big yellow flower bgiu.jpg) by having more strongly branched stems and golden yellow ligulate flowers. So this might be the correct ID of your plant. Alternatively also Tragopogon pratensis subsp. orientalis could be possible. A definite decision would be possible if I could see ripe fruits. I removed this image from Tragopogon pratensis and added it to Tragopogon as a plant of uncertain identity. Regards --Franz Xaver 9 July 2005 17:09 (UTC)

Hello Franz! I could go and take a picture of the plant when the fruits are ripen, but do you have any idea in how many weeks after the blossoming should that be ? Bogdan 9 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan! This would be great, to have a photo of fruits. It is possible that both flower heads on your photo, which were closed when you took the photo, in one or two weeks are ripe. Usually you have the first ripe fruits when still some heads are flowering on the same plant. In order to determine the species a closeup from the side of the fruits is necessary, to see the length relation of the body of the achene versus the beak, i.e. the thinner upper part of the achene. Probably you searched the internet for photos of Tragopogon hayekii: Your photo would not be the first one, but by far the best on internet, probably for quite a long time. --Franz Xaver 00:23, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi Franz! I went again there but I couldn't find that plant. :-( Bogdan 19:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan! Now I identified Image:Unknown star flower.jpg. It is a young plant of Centaurea calcitrapa. --Franz Xaver 21:48, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Hello! Image:Centaurea 02 bgiu.jpg is Centaurea nigrescens.
Image:Centaurea bgiu.jpg is difficult to determinate, probably it is Centaurea pseudophrygia. --Franz Xaver 16:39, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, Franz. Bogdan 17:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Hello Bogdan! Image:Acer platanoides leaves fruit bgiu.jpg is Platanus x hispanica (= P. x acerifolia), the hybrid of Platanus orientalis and P. occidentalis. This is the most commonly planted Platanus in Europe. --Franz Xaver 08:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hieracium flower bgiu.jpg: This time it is Sonchus arvensis --Franz Xaver 12:22, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan! Image:Yellow thorny flower bgiu.jpg is Carthamus lanatus --Franz Xaver 17:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Hello! I am sorry to say that Image:Campanula latifolia bgiu.jpg is not Campanula latifolia. Actually it is Campanula rapunculoides. You would find Campanula latifolia in mountain forests and meadows in the Carpathians. The color of flowers in C. latifolia usually is darker and the flowers are 40-55 mm long. I suppose the flowers of your plants were only 20-30 mm long, which are the dimensions for C. rapunculoides. And in C. rapunculoides the calyx teeth are recurved as in your plant, whereas in C. latifolia they are erect or patent. Regards --Franz Xaver 17:50, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan! Image:Vicia 01 bgiu.jpg has turned out to be Lathyrus hirsutus --Franz Xaver 07:25, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Image:Small white flowers bgiu.jpg

I think that is a Stellaria, but I'm not sure which species. At any rates, it's likely a caryophyllaceae. Circeus 14:20, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Confusing licensing

Could you please see my question at en:Image_talk:Romania_Graiuri.jpg#Confusing_licensing about the licensing on this? Thanks. -- en:Jmabel | talk 05:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Father Damien, 1889.jpeg

I've just recived an email from the helpdesk suggesting that the image may not be in the public domain. It appears that while the black and white version is public domain the coloured version was created more recently by the Granger Collection.Geni 18:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

So...

Where exactly IS Image:Lamppost bgiu.jpg and what's it trying to light up so badly? Is stuff like that normal? 68.39.174.238 06:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC) (PS. A reply to my page on the eN-WikipediA will get a better response, thanx again.)

Campanula

Hello Bogdan! Your Image:Campanula rotundifolia bgiu.jpg is not Campanula rotundifolia. Actually it is Campanula persicifolia --Franz Xaver 20:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Marthe Bibesco Boldini.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Marthe Bibesco Boldini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo 13:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

moved article

Hi Bogdan - i moved Euonymus europaea to Euonymus europaeus because the last one seems to be the right spelling. The redirect with the wrong spelling should be deleted here (i gave it a delete-tag). Greetings -- Schusch 15:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

invitation

Salut Bogdan!

You may be interested in Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 20:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Mape

Image:Arvanitic IE.png is wrong. Becose Gege+Tosk+Arvanitic+Arbërëresh makes Shqip see the kongres for unificetet Shqip.--Hipi Zhdripi 13:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

PIE
Commone Ilirien + Pellazg
-- (Roman E.) --
Gegë + Tosk
-- {Ottoman Empier after Skenderbeg} --
Gegë (Alb.+Jug.) + Arbërëresh (Ita.+Zara+Split, Kroatien) + Tosk (Alb.+ south FRMac.)+ Arvanitic (Jonina,Gr.+Rumelien)

-- {after Ottoman E. it was congres} --
Shqip

OR

Arbërëresh (west Church influec dialect) + Shqip + (east Church influenc dialect) Arvanitic

Arbërëresh and Arvanitic communicat together in Shqip (moustly in south Italy)

User:Pfctdayelise/Translations

Would you take a moment to contribute Romanian to this page? Two places, the two line message and the one line edit summary (at the bottom of page).

Thanks! Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 16:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bucium-Voroneţ.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bucium-Voroneţ.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 19:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Marthe Bibesco Boldini.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Marthe Bibesco Boldini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo 13:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gheorghiu-dej Ceausescu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gheorghiu-dej Ceausescu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ixitixel 12:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gara_de_nord_foto_veche.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Gara_de_nord_foto_veche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Matt314 16:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Administrator

Congratulations! You are administrator now. --EugeneZelenko 15:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Bogdan/Archive1, congratulations! You now have the the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other SYSOPS, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net.

Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 15:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! :-) Bogdan 20:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Octavian_Goga.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Octavian_Goga.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Bogdan, I just want to say thank you for your very nice shot Image:Floare galbena bgiu.jpg. We use it as a kind of symbolic welcome image on Search Wikia. You may find it also on some screenshots like [5] on the web therefore. Congrats to adminship, by the way :-) Greetings --rieke 01:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:ByzantineDromon.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ByzantineDromon.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 04:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories “Men of <country>” and “Women of <country>”

Hello,

I didn't notice these categories before. My policy is to categorize a person's picture according to his or her name. So, as Commons is a bank of media files for Wikipedia article writers, I think that categories Men of <country> and Women of <country> are not useful for this aim (an article writer don't need Commons categorization to know if his article subject is a man or a woman). --Juiced lemon 19:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ion Antonescu und Hermann Goering.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ion Antonescu und Hermann Goering.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Davepape 02:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bucovina Romania Ukraine.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Bucovina Romania Ukraine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 20:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Pagina principală

Hi. I update structure of Romanian main page. But I don't know Romanian. Please translate English text. Thanks.
I also asked User:Radufan to do so. ~ putnik 19:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Mulţumesc foarte mult

Salut Bogdan! Ce mai faci? Grazie tante per aver tradotto nella bella lingua romena il testo della mia foto A girl looking at herself in the mirror.jpg. Ho altre foto su Commons e mi piacerebbe che qualcuno potesse tradurle in romeno (dacă ai mai putea să faci traducţia pozele care am facut). I nomi delle foto sono: Image:A gipsy woman with her dog.JPG

Image:A gipsy woman with her child.JPG

Image:A gipsy woman outside of a church - Rome.JPG

Image:A child running.jpg

Image:A baby looking at his lollipop.jpg

Image:A child sleeping.jpg

Încăodată mulţumesc, --Alessandro Zangrilli 08:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Photos from the Italian Ministerio Della Diffesa

Hi, your Italian is better than my, could you then proof if this images are allowed by the Italian ministry of defense to use them in other projects like Wikimedia Commons ?

• image1
• image2
• image 3

Here is the source of the photos.

If yes, I would upload them into commons.

Best regards, Pimke 07:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Cannon_pic.jpg

I am terribly sorry to bother you, but I was just wondering if this image of a cannon that you took, if it was a replica of a cannon or if it once was a working cannon. And I know the picture is two years old, so you probably wouldn't know, but do you know what kind of cannon it is, as in when it was made and where? Thank you kindly JayKeaton 05:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ion_Antonescu_tinererete.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ion_Antonescu_tinererete.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 11:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Eminescu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eminescu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 01:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bdcantem.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Bdcantem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Alex:D 00:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Bot request

Greetings. I have requested to be approved to use a bot to add categories to images. The request for approval has turned into something of a debate. I wonder if you would like to comment? Commons:Bots/Requests for flags/Polbot Quadell (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Transylvania.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Transylvania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

(fixed an old request -- Deadstar 12:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC))

Image Tagging Image:Voronet1_secureroot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Voronet1_secureroot.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 13:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Voronet2_secureroot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Voronet2_secureroot.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 13:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Voronet3_secureroot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Voronet3_secureroot.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 13:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Revert because?

Please clarify why you reverted a deletion warning on a file source sxc.hu without comment and without notifying me as you did here and in two other places. Please see {{Sxc-warning}} and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Sxc-warning. Cheers! Siebrand 21:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Because it's a photo of a PD painting. Bogdan 12:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:C_Alba1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:C_Alba1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Eminescu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eminescu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 11:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Victor_Babes.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Victor_Babes.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 11:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Help needed

Dear Bogdan. I need your help with a very serious and annoying issue. I became a member of Wikimedia commons in order to contribute to Wikipedia as a whole. I've uploaded some very interesting and useful information connected with anthropology and history research. But the user User:ForeignerFromTheEast from Bulgaria is constantly vandalizing my contributions by deleting the license tags. By doing this he is disturbing my contribution process. Other users have warned him for vandalism on his talk page, but he keeps on deleting the licenses and the comments on his talk page. Please check his contributions and you will see that the only thing he does is deleting my contributions. Please act by the protocol and give him a warning. This kind of behavior is not allowed on Wikimedia. With respect. Revizionist 21:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Curtea_veche_bgiu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Curtea_veche_bgiu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Roch_codex_sample.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Roch_codex_sample.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Alexandru Xenopol.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandru Xenopol.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Patstuart 18:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:General Alex Averescu.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:General Alex Averescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Patstuart 22:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:General Averescu.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:General Averescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Patstuart 22:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Tristan Tzara.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tristan Tzara.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.34 18:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Piata Sf Gheorghe Bucuresti.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Piata Sf Gheorghe Bucuresti.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Patstuart 18:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocking?!

Who are you to block me?! Give me some examples please before threat me--OsamaK 17:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Misuse of No source since

Hi Bogdan, I see a lot of pictures being tagged by OsamaK with no source since. With most of the pictures nothing is wrong, but the uploader isnt even notified of this tagging so he or she will probably not even notice it! You already reverted a lot of edits but this looks like destroying a lot of perfectly fine pictures. How many pictures have already been deleted because of this tagging? You can of course see this at Special:DeletedContributions/OsamaK. Could you have another look at it? This looks like a way to circumvent the deletion debate and destroy content. Thank you, Multichill 16:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

I just checked a random file that was deleted and it had info like this:

DescriptionBogdan/Archive1	Retrato del Gobernador Gabriel Cano y Aponte
Date	Painting of the XVIII century
Source	Museo Historico Nacional
Author	anonimo
Permission (Reusing this file)	Public domain

It was definitely a misuse of the no source tag. Bogdan 20:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Petru Groza

Am completat la imaginea Image:Petru Groza joben.jpg licenta. Cand a imagine este de 70 de ani mai veche atunci pune {{PD-old}} asa, si nu "Source: Old public domain work" pentru ca careva il va pune la sters. Te rog sa completezi de unde provine imaginea lui Groza si cine este presupusul autor (daca nu sti atunci scrie ca nu este cunoscut).--Immanuel 11:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Information

Hi Bogdan, do you remember where you took this image? Could you add some information (country at least, if possible town/city too) to the description page? Many thanks :-) --Überraschungsbilder 22:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Simeon_de_Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Simeon_de_Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Administrative notice

Deutsch

Dear Bogdan/Archive1. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you,
abf /talk to me/ 18:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rongo-rongo_script.gif

Image:Rongo-rongo_script.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kwamikagami 08:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I put up a higher-res jpeg, so I doubt there's still a need for this. Kwamikagami 08:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Inactivity

Hi Bogdan/Archive1. Thanks for signing at this page. Please note that your sysop-rights will be removed the next time we run an inactivity-section without any new notice, if you do not do 5 admin-actions till then.
Thank you for your long and helpfull work on Commons! abf /talk to me/ 12:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ileana of Romania 1909.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ileana of Romania 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 21:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Gules_a_bend_or.svg

Qualcuno sta sostituendo alcuni stemmi (ad esempio Blason_ville_fr_Villespy_(Aude).svg e Blason_famille_Noailles.svg) con altro stemma (Gules_a_bend_or.svg) solo perché ha la stessa blasonatura e, quindi, lo stesso disegno (di rosso, alla banda d'oro). Tutto ciò può sembrare molto logico e funzionale ma, in realtà, servirà solo a rendere impossibile a chi ricerca l'immagine degli stemmi delle città di Villespy e di Noailles di trovarli. Non sarà infatti possibile fare una ricerca per nome di file e non sarà possibile nemmeno cercare per categoria (Coats of arms of cities in Aude e Coats of arms of cities in Corrèze rispettivamente) perché chi ha fatto la sostituzione ha linkato Gules_a_bend_or.svg con entrambe le categorie, ma ora non compare più il nome della città, ovviamente. A questo punto l'unico modo per trovare lo stemma di Noailles è quello di cominciare a girare per le varie wiki finché se ne trova una che riporti quello stemma. Tieni conto che per molto tempo la wiki francese non ha riportato gli stemmi civici negli articoli delle città, ma solo negli armoriali. Chi non conosce il sistema è bloccato. Avevo già cercato di far capire aun altro amministratore che in araldica il disegno è solo una parte del problema, il nome è altrettanto importante, ma mi pare che il concetto non sia stato acquisito. Ripeto: ciò che è ovvio e logico nella gestione dei dati e dei database (e lo dico come persona che ha utilizzato i database relazionali per gli oltre trent'anni della sua vita lavorativa) non lo è altrettanto in araldica (e probabilmente in altre 50 discipline che non conosco e su cui non mi pronuncio). Ti chiedo dunque di voler valutare il problema e portarlo all'attenzione degli amministratori di Commons prima che gran parte delle informazioni araldiche oggi presenti vada definitivamente perduto in nome di una presunta maggiore efficienza. Scusa per la lunghezza ma non mi è facile sintetizzare meglio il problema. Ciao e grazie. Massimop 21:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Carol_Lupescu_1940.jpeg

Image deletion warning

Image:Carol_Lupescu_1940.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sdrtirs 01:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you

Please change the name of

Image:תמונות מצלמה 7 (מכיל תמונות צמחים) 019.jpg

into:

File:Image-Acca sellowiana flower 1.jpg

thanks, Yelod 14:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I moved it to Image:Acca sellowiana flower 1.jpg Bogdan 15:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bancanationala_anii1920.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bancanationala_anii1920.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kelly 06:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Salut Bogdane,

Nu sunt acasa, sunt pe alt terminal, dar sunt Spiridon Manoliu. Credeam ca poza lui Zaharia (Romul cu aurul pe el) era eliberata in domaniul public de mult. Eu am prelucrat-o ca atare. Daca exista un autor identificat al fotografiei originale, fii bun si spue-mi numele sau, ca sa-i cer invoirea. Iti multumesc. Spiridon Manoliu, marti 24 iunie ora 11:55.

Evenimentul Zilei, care a publicat fotografia, spune că poza a fost făcută de un fotoreporter al Associated Press, o agenţie mare de presă, ceea ce înseamnă că nu e nicio şansă să se învoiască, pentru că ei câştigă bani tocmai din vânzarea drepturilor de copiere a unor astfel de poze. Bogdan (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Road park Zagreb.jpg

This picture of yours is lacking a source (judging by the name of the author and your username, I believe you made it). I'm also interested to know where did you exactly take this picture, as I'd like to include it in one of Wikipedia articles about Zagreb neighborhoods. Admiral Norton (talk) 22:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I added the coordinates. It's somewhere on the side of the river from the city center (toward Novi Zagreb) and quite close to the river. Bogdan (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That's under the Freedom Bridge, west of Lake Bundek in Novi Zagreb. Admiral Norton (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nicolae Titulescu.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Nicolae Titulescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Ricky81682 (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 20:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Alexandru Ioan Cuza.jpg

Hey Bogdan.
Whats up with Alexandru Ioan Cuza.jpg? There is no information about the source and you as an admin should know that such images get speedy deleted if there is no source added! You may also include and fill in the information in {{Information}}.
--D-Kuru (talk) 11:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

File: Tonpostkarte.jpg

Hello Bogdan, you have deleted my file Tonpostkarte.jpg what I do not understand.

• There was no discussion (with me)
• I have got no mail about this
• This photo is my own and a difficult work
• First its demonstrate the real existence of grammophone record on a postcard. The grove on the surface was by special light demonstrated! It is no simple copy of the postcard, no scanner work.
• Second its demonstrate the lanchíd is become famous and a subject everyone allways.
• If my photo is not free than all of the automobile photos in the WP are not free... There is no car photo older than 70 year here.--Wikipit (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
• Not but least the photo of gramophone record contains no sound what is its normal aim!--Wikipit (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Wikipit. The copyright is owned by the person who took the photograph of the bridge. A photograph of a photograph is a derived work and is against the rules of Commons. If you think I'm wrong, then you can try posting the issue at Commons:Undeletion requests. Bogdan (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bukovina_1910.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bukovina_1910.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bukovina_1910.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

ChristianBier (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Bezhnoznik u stanka 19-1929.jpeg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Swimming dog bgiu.jpg

Hi Bogdan, I really like this photo :) Could you please add the missing information (author/source), so that nobody deletes it because of "no source" or so? -- \mu/ 06:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! -- \mu/ 12:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

reuse of your image without full credits nor licence information

Hello, http://www.futura-sciences.com/fr/news/t/botanique-1/d/ogm-la-menace-des-super-mauvaises-herbes-samplifie_19036/

Reused some of your image without specifying the licence nor the author. (they just say 'Source: Commons' which seems insufisant to my eyes.) Just for your information.

Esby (talk) 14:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

OTRS invitation

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our Italian permissions queue. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider signing up at the volunteering page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 14:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Christian Tell.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Christian Tell.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Wknight94 ^talk 02:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Bogdan!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Corfu moraitika cats bgiu.jpg was uncategorized on 18 August 2009.
• Image:Euphorbia wulfenii - Foggy Bummer.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bucuresti pasaj.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Arthur Verona - În codrii Herţei.jpg was uncategorized on 6 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Inochenție of Balta.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Cladirea ASE Bucuresti.jpg was uncategorized on 6 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File:OTE_tower_Salonik_bgiu.jpg

File:OTE_tower_Salonik_bgiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 06:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

File:White flower 01 bgiu.jpg & File:Crocus heuffelianus bgiu.jpg

Dear Bogdan,

I confirm that these two files are correctly renamed. As you can see I had in the past put them already in Category:Ornithogalum pyramidale & Category:Crocus vernus, respectively, but since I am not an administator I could not rename them.

FYI: Ornithogalum pyramidale is widly distributed in Eastern Europe, wheaeras Ornithogalum narbonense is strictly mediterranean.

Best botanic regards, --Réginald (To reply) 08:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the identification of the two plants. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Albert al Prusiei

I know it's been a while, but at File:Reception at Palatul Domnesc, 1843.jpg, can you work out exactly who "Albert al Prusiei" would be? From what I can see, that name most commonly refers to someone not even alive at that time. - Jmabel ! talk 06:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.jpg
• File:Traian vuia flying machine.jpg
• File:ICBratianu.png
• File:Ion Antonescu during his trial.jpg
• File:Siege of Pleven map.jpg
• File:Nicolae Grigorescu - Pescarita la Grandville.jpg
• File:Constantin Argetoianu inchisoare.gif

BotMultichillT 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Picturi de la MMB

Mulţumesc pentru link. O să încerc să le preiau. Nu ştiam de site. :) Mvelam (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ion Antonescu during his trial.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ion Antonescu during his trial.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ion Antonescu during his trial.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--72.88.33.93 05:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Constantin Argetoianu inchisoare.gif

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Constantin Argetoianu inchisoare.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Constantin Argetoianu inchisoare.gif]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--72.88.33.93 05:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Casa Scanteii 02 bgiu.jpg

File:Casa Scanteii 02 bgiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Justass (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Misidentified Image:Veronica_chamaedrys_bgiu.jpg

Hello Bogdan/Archive1,

your image Image:Veronica_chamaedrys_bgiu.jpg is misplaced and misnamed, because it does not show Veronica chamaedrys. This image shows very likely Veronica persica. I have not got any information about possible lookalikes from Romania, though. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I am convinced now that this is Veronica persica. I renamed and reindexed the page. You could help by correcting the corresponding entry http://www.eol.org/pages/578495?image_id=4241848 as well (if you know how to do this). --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Delegates at Peace of Bucharest.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Delegates at Peace of Bucharest.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— ξ^xplicit 19:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

ID of File:Trifolium dubium bgiu.jpg

Dear Bogdan/Archive1,

I changed the image File:Trifolium dubium bgiu.jpg from Trifolium dubium to Trifolium campestre because of the number of flowers per flower head (more than 20) and because of the typical big standard with visible parallel nerves. See e.g. http://www.blumeninschwaben.de/Zweikeimblaettrige/Schmetterlingsbluetler/klee.htm (chapter 3.2). -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prince_Nicolas_of_Romania,_1923.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prince_Nicolas_of_Romania,_1923.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Prince_Nicolas_of_Romania,_1923.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hello Bogdan, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 18:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Linear_B.jpg

File:Linear_B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Mulţumesc

Mulţumesc că pe mine, care am lucrat mult mai mult la desen, m-ai văzut, dar pe acesta nu. Poţi face acelaşi lucru şi pentru File:Mother Teresa 1.jpg a cărei sursă este http://www.radioassistant.com/RA/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Mother_Teresa.jpg ? --Turbojet (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Bogdan/Archive1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Romania nu are FoP?!

Buna Bogdan, poti sa te uiti te rog la requestul asta pentru stergere: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:2009-DSC09986.JPG

Pozele par OK, sunt puse de cel care le-a facut.

Sunt of grama de requesturi aici: User_talk:A.Catalina

Turelio asta vrea sa stearga o gramada de poze cu Romania, spunand ca Romania nu are FoP. Mie mi se pare poarte suspect si incorect. Cu logica asta, o gramada de poze despre Romania vor fi sterse. Ce este acest FoP?

Numai bine --Codrin.B (talk) 03:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Bogdan, as you are no longer an admin, could you please remove the admin-box from your userpage. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Bogdan, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA and WP:DACIA to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Adunare Piaţa Palatului August 1968.jpg

And also:

• File:IICCR JA050 Dej Groza Festivalul Mondial al Tineretului.jpg
• File:IICCR LA502 Ceauşescu and Justin Moisescu.jpg

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:PD-RO-photo

Thanks for the work on Template:PD-RO-photo. Maybe you wish to clarify its specific usage at Commons:Copyright tags#Romania. Best regards. --Codrin.B (talk) 20:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from the Romanian Communism Online Photo Collection

Buna Bogdan, nu stiu daca ai vazut asta: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from the Romanian Communism Online Photo Collection. --Codrin.B (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Eroare

Salut! la File:Szathmary - Casa Procopoaiei.jpg ai pus explicaţia : Română: Carol Popp de Szathmary - Trăsura de campanie a lui Nicolae Grigorescu în timpul Războiului de Independenţă. Probabil că ai încurcat pozele cu explicaţiile. Sper că nu-ţi creez insomnii pe tema aceasta! Toate cele bune, --Miehs (talk) 19:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Mulțumesc, am modificat. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION

Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.

The photos which I would use are:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Red_flowers_bgiu.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clematis_vitalba_bgiu.jpg

Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com

Bye,

Edoardo

Sure, you can use them in your book. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barbu Catargiu.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Barbu Catargiu.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Barbu Catargiu.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 09:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Palatul Victoria bgiu.jpg

File:Palatul Victoria bgiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 07:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Sunset on the government.jpg

File:Sunset on the government.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 07:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Athenee Palace Hilton.JPG

File:Athenee Palace Hilton.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 07:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexander Beliaev scan.jpg

File:Alexander Beliaev scan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Bogdan - do you have a location for File:Vinca minor bgiu.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I took the photo at the en:Bucharest Botanical Garden. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Licenses

Oh, ok, thanks! -- George Miquilena (hablar) 15:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Batalia Pompierilor Dealul Spirei.jpg

Hi! Could you please add a source and author to File:Batalia Pompierilor Dealul Spirei.jpg? It is a great lithography and would hate to see it removed. I added more detail and cats to it. Best! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bogdan

Hello Bogdan,

I am writing to you regarding the pictures of Carol Popp de Szathmari. I am a student and I am trying to do a documentary about him. Do you think that I can use your pictures ? Thank you very much,

Multumesc mult ! (ti-am scris in engleza pentru ca nu stiu care sunt regulile pe wikipedia)

Salut,

Sigur că poți să folosești imaginile, ăsta e și scopul Wikipedia, să adune informații care să poată fi refolosite. Toate imaginile care sunt pe Wikimedia Commons sunt imagini care pot fi refolosite. La cele mai noi, de obicei trebuie respectată o licență (Commons:Licensing), dar pentru Szathmari, copyrightul a expirat de mult. :)

Toate cele bune, Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Wallachian and Moldavian noblemen, late sixteenth century.jpg

Salut! Foarte interesanta imagine. Ai putea te rog sa mai adaugi informatii legata de sursa, carte, autor, an, licenta. Este cumva o traducere a textului in germana, asociat? Multumesc! --Codrin.B (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Mersi de raspuns. L-ai cumparat de la Bridge Man art sau cum ai reusit sa-l obtii fara watermark? --Codrin.B (talk) 09:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Casa Scânteii.jpg

And also:

• File:Secera si ciocanul Casa Scanteii.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Unauthorized Bot

The user page of this account claims that it is your bot. Is that the case? If so, please note that according to our policy on bots, all bots running on Wikimedia Commons must have advance permission to do so. Please see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#User:Unauthorized Bot is editing. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I've also blocked User:Botul prietenos. If this was the only bot acct, I would've suggested going back and getting a bot flag, but in light of the abbove blocked bot acct, I decided to block this one. Please get a bot flag if you intend to use further bots. INeverCry 19:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

 Info I've also posted a question concerning some of the files uploaded by this acct: Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Category:Familia. INeverCry 21:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Could you comment on your bot request please, ore are you not interested in pursuing this further? --Dschwen (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Creator templates without home category

Bogdan you have created bunch of Creator templates (great!) but did not created matching categories. As a result you filled Category:Creator templates without home category maintenance category. Could you help with creating matching categories? --Jarekt (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I created and populated the Books by categories (Category:Books by Dimitrie R. Rosetti), but not the person category (Category:Dimitrie R. Rosetti) themselves. I'll fix it. Thanks for noticing. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks --Jarekt (talk) 21:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stefan cel Mare.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stefan cel Mare.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:A Moţ and His Cart in Bucharest.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:A Moţ and His Cart in Bucharest.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Decebalus b.jpg

File:Decebalus b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Balkan links.jpg

File:Balkan links.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Univ ro-am bgiu.jpg

File:Univ ro-am bgiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bucharest bizarre.jpg

File:Bucharest bizarre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bancorex building bgiu.jpg

File:Bancorex building bgiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Two files to check

Please check File:Bukarester Tagblatt 1884-07-27, nr. 168.pdf and File:Bukarester Tagblatt 1902-04-04, nr. 076.pdf, they are not what they supposed to be. --Denniss (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Creator templates without home category

Bogdan,

I was just working on fixing the templates in Category:Creator templates without home category when I run into a set of templates

• Creator:Ștefan Zeletin
• Creator:Ștefan Vasilie Episcopescul
• Creator:Ștefan Petică
• Creator:Ștefan Octavian Iosif
• Creator:Ștefan Laday
• Creator:Ștefan Dimitrie Grecianu
• Creator:Ștefan Călinescu
• Creator:Ștefan C. Michăilescu
• Creator:Ștefan C. Hepites
• Creator:Zacharia C. Panțu
• Creator:Zacharia Boiu
• Creator:Visarion Macri
• Creator:Vintilă I. C. Brătianu
• Creator:Vintilă Dongoroz
• Creator:Victor Crăsescu
• Creator:Victor Babeș
• Creator:Vicențiu Babeș
• Creator:Vasilie Popp
• Creator:Vasile G. Morțun
• Creator:Vasile Demetrius
• Creator:Vasile Cuțarida
• Creator:Theodor Dimitrie Speranția
• Creator:Theodor D. Speranția
• Creator:Teodor V. Ștefanelli
• Creator:Teodor V. Păcățian
• Creator:Teodor C. Văcărescu
• Creator:Teodor Bălășel
• Creator:Teodor Botiș
• Creator:Spătarul Nicolae Milescu
• Creator:Simion C. Mihălescu
• Creator:Simion Bărnuțiu
• Creator:Simeon Florea Marian
• Creator:Sabba Ștefănescu
• Creator:Petre Teulescu
• Creator:Petre Liciu
• Creator:Ovid Densușianu
• Creator:Nifon Bălășescu
• Creator:Nicolae Țincu
• Creator:Nicolae Șuțu
• Creator:Nicolae Văcărescu
• Creator:Nicolae T. Orășanu
• Creator:Nicolae Suțu
• Creator:Nicolae Michăilescu
• Creator:Nicolae Istrati
• Creator:Nicolae Drăganu
• Creator:Nicolae Brânzeu
• Creator:Nerva Hodoș
• Creator:Narcis Crețulescu
• Creator:Muzeul Municipal din Iași
• Creator:Mihail Zotta
• Creator:Mihail G. Boiagi
• Creator:Mihail Dragomirescu
• Creator:Mihail C. Șuțu
• Creator:Mihail C. Vlădescu
• Creator:Mihai C. Brăneanu
• Creator:Maria Cunțan
• Creator:Lazăr Șăineanu
• Creator:Ionică Tăutul
• Creator:Ion Sîrbu
• Creator:Ion Popovici-Bănățeanu
• Creator:Ion M. Rîureanu
• Creator:Ion Ionescu de la Brad
• Creator:Ion I. Heliade Rădulescu
• Creator:Ion C. Brătianu
• Creator:Ion Balași Athanasiad
• Creator:Ion A. Lăpedatu
• Creator:Ioan Văcărescu
• Creator:Ioan Tomici
• Creator:Ioan Teodorovici-Nica
• Creator:Ioan Sârbu
• Creator:Ioan S. Nenițescu
• Creator:Ioan Prale
• Creator:Ioan Piuariu-Molnar
• Creator:Ioan N. Șoimescu
• Creator:Ioan Molnar
• Creator:Ioan I. Mironescu
• Creator:Ioan C. Bacalbașa
• Creator:Ioan Barac
• Creator:Ienăchiță Văcărescu
• Creator:Henri H. Stahl
• Creator:Haralambie Fundățeanu
• Creator:Grigore Pleșoianu
• Creator:Grigore Mithridate Buiucliu
• Creator:Gregoriu Ștefănescu
• Creator:Gherasim Piteșteanu Timuș
• Creator:Gheorghe Tăutu
• Creator:Gheorghe Ionescu-Gion
• Creator:Gheorghe D. Mărdărescu
• Creator:Gheorghe Constantin Roja
• Creator:Gheorghe Bogdan-Duică
• Creator:Ghenadie Enăceanu
• Creator:George Vâlsan
• Creator:George Rădulescu
• Creator:George Radu Melidon
• Creator:George Ioan Lahovari
• Creator:George I. Gibescu
• Creator:George Brătianu
• Creator:George Barițiu
• Creator:George B. Știrbei
• Creator:Frederic Stork
• Creator:Eugen C. Decusară
• Creator:Emil Gârleanu
• Creator:Dumitru Brănescu
• Creator:Dimitrie Țichindeal
• Creator:Dimitrie S. Nenițescu
• Creator:Dimitrie R. Ioanițescu
• Creator:Dimitrie G. Brândza
• Creator:Dimitrie D. Pătrășcanu
• Creator:Dimitrie D. Dăscălescu
• Creator:Dimitrie Ciocârdia-Matila
• Creator:Dimitrie Brândza
• Creator:Damaschin Bojincă
• Creator:Costache Stamati
• Creator:Costache Bălăcescu
• Creator:Corneliu Chiseliță
• Creator:Constanța Hodoș
• Creator:Constantin Șăineanu
• Creator:Constantin V. Buțureanu
• Creator:Constantin N. Brăiloiu
• Creator:Constantin I. Brătianu
• Creator:Constantin G. Rătescu
• Creator:Constantin Dimitrescu-Iași
• Creator:Constantin Diaconovici-Loga
• Creator:Constantin C. Bacalbașa
• Creator:Constantin Alimăneștianu
• Creator:Christea N. Țapu
• Creator:Calistrat Hogaș
• Creator:Barbu Paris Mumuleanu
• Creator:Badea Cireșeanu
• Creator:Aurel Babeș
• Creator:Aron Densușianu
• Creator:Anton Bacalbașa
• Creator:Alexandru Ștefulescu
• Creator:Alexandru V. Gîdei
• Creator:Alexandru Sahia
• Creator:Alexandru Depărățeanu
• Creator:Alexandru Christian Tell
• Creator:Alexandru Babeș

which were created by you, unused and uncategorized. What are you planning on doing with those templates? Are you going to add them to files and categories? In the current state they are quite hard to find. --Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

It seems that there are more cases for these:

• some of them have a different spelling as category; for instance: Category:George I. Ionnescu-Gion for Creator:Gheorghe Ionescu-Gion.
• some categories use wrong diacritics (for instance, Category:Calistrat Hogaş for Creator:Calistrat Hogaș). The correct versions should be using ș and ț and this is a rather massive task to do (there are a lot of categories on Commons using the wrong diacritics).
• for some, there is simply no category or usage. I suppose I'll have to look why. The Creator were generated using entries from the Bucharest Library for which there were scanned PDF books (of which I uploaded a few thousands). Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

In my previous uploads I found out that the most time consuming part was matching authors of images to commons categories. I sometimes were using spreadsheets and matching them first by the birth and death years. I know it is a big task and if there are any tasks I can do with user:JarektBot I will be happy to help. --Jarekt (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I could use a bot to rename some categories and pages (related to the ș/ț issue). I could make the list of source and destination names, it's probably going to be around 10k pages. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Permisiunea de administrator

Bună ziua, sunt un steward de pe meta. O noua politică a fost creată, despre permisiunile avansate (administrator, birocrat etc.) a fost adoptată de comunitați mai recent. După politica aceasta stewards revizualizează activitatea administratorilor de pe Wikipedii care nu au deja o politică de inactivitate.

Dumneavoastră sunteți in criteriu de inactivitate (nici o editare sau acțiune în jurnal) pe rowikibooks, unde sunteți administator. Din cauza că wikipediaxx nu are proces de revizualizare se aplică cea globală.

Dacă doriți să mențineți drepturile, trebuie să notificați comunitatea că stewards v-au trimis această informație despre inactivitate ca să discutați. Dacă comunitatea dorește să păstrați drepturile, contactați stewards la m:Stewards' noticeboard, și dați un link la discuția din comunitate, unde declară că vor să mențineți drepturile.

Noi, stewarzii vom evalua răspunsurile. Dacă nu este primit nici un răspuns într-o lună, vă vom retrage permisiunile. În caz de îndoială, vom evalua răspunsurile și vom verifica răspunsurile şi vom înainta o discuţiei comunităţii locale pentru a disputa.Dacă aveți vreo întrebare, contactați-ne pe m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Cele mai bune, Rschen7754 05:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Unauthorized Bot

I mentioned you at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Uploads_by_Unauthorized_Bot_-_Out_of_scope.3F. Not sure if this was your bot since it was a couple years ago. INeverCry 09:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Arthur Verona - În codrii Herţei.jpg

File:Arthur Verona - În codrii Herţei.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Andrei S. _Talk 21:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Galley fresco

Hi Bogdan, May you inform me about the “galley fresco” image? I mean: place, church, … etc. As I am a fan of old Naval Architecture this information is very important to me. Thank you very much. Roger Liart (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bezbozhnik u stanka US 1930.jpg

File:Bezbozhnik u stanka US 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Altenmann (talk) 16:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Bezbozhnik - Forward to the complete collectivization, November 1, 1930.jpg

File:Bezbozhnik - Forward to the complete collectivization, November 1, 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Altenmann (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Bezbozhnik u stanka - 35 million unemployed in the capitalistic world, 1931, n.8.jpg

File:Bezbozhnik u stanka - 35 million unemployed in the capitalistic world, 1931, n.8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Altenmann (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Albanian language map.jpg

File:Albanian language map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Românul 1867-04-27.pdf

File:Românul 1867-04-27.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2601:586:4A03:4461:ED6E:D160:6B6:C923 04:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

File:King Mihai I of Romania postcard.jpg

File:King Mihai I of Romania postcard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Please import the history of a Romanian text from Old Wikisoource to Romanian Wikisource

oldwikisource:Balada basarabeană despre bătălia de la Lipnic -> s:ro:Balada basarabeană despre bătălia de la Lipnic, please.--Jusjih (talk) 02:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Troiță

Troiță has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Misidentified image File:Euphorbia amygdaloides bgiu.jpg

• 
  your photograph
• 
  Euphorbia amygdaloides, closeup
• 
  Euphorbia amygdaloides

Hi Bogdan/Archive1,
Your photograph above (lefmost photo in the gallery) cannot be Euphorbia amygdaloides because the bract-like leaves just below the flowers, which always occur in pairs, are not at all fused. Euphorbia amygdaloides has these connate (fused) pairs of special leaves just below the flowers. You can see in the closeup image how this is supposed to look. Unfortunately I am unable to find a correct ID for your photograph. So I moved it to Category:Unidentified Euphorbia and added Category:Misidentified plants.
Best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear author,

we would like to use the following picture for a biodiversity handout to train and inform farmers in the field of biodiversity:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Centaurea_nigrescens_subsp._nigrescens_bgiu.jpg

The question is whether you are the author of this picture (wikipedia says Bogdan assumed based on copyright claims) and if so, whether you are fine with using it.

Your name along with a link to the original file and the creative common license will be named in the picture index (sorted by page number and order of pictures).

I would be very grateful if you could give me a short answer.

Kind regards, Ulrike Harant

Black Sea Map 5000 BC

Hi, I came across your Black Sea map (Black-sea-hist.png). Can you please let me know which sources you used to create it? Thanks in advance! Skl1750 (talk) 08:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Iosif Berman - Copii cântând la vioară în centrul Bucureştiului în perioada interbelică.jpg

File:Iosif Berman - Copii cântând la vioară în centrul Bucureştiului în perioada interbelică.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Also File:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg De728631 (talk) 15:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected file:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg. Taivo (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Romanian National Library under construction, Northern façade.jpg

And also:

• File:Romanian National Library, under construction.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

People images

Hi when you upload photo of a person can you add category in which they fit on image page or create their own page with gallery and place that in category i.e. in Francis Ford Coppola in Category:Film directors so people can find the image easily. Thanks! en:User_talk:Arniep

Deletion

Hello! I tagged your image, for deletion, because it includes Botosani County in Bucovina, which is inaccurate. this image: is the correct one. Your image sparked a debate at [6]. If you have any reason for the inclusion of Botosani county in the historical region of Bucovina, please say it. Thank you.

Later edit. I am asking because here: [7] and here: [8] two other people also included Botosani county in bucovina, so I think something must be true about it. We at ro.wiki would really apreciate if you could clear this for us. Thank you again.

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español

Dear Bogdan/Archive1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you

TUSC token 3b496e1d6f458dce1a86030ea8497ebf

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Atlas of Serbia

A new conflict is starting here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atlas_of_Serbia&action=history

Copyright?

Dear author,

we would like to use the following picture for biodiversity handout to train and inform farmers in the field biodiversity. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Centaurea_nigrescens_subsp._nigrescens_bgiu.jpg I therefore would like to know, whether you are the author of this picture, and if so, whether you are fine if we use it in the described way?

Your user name along with the CC license and a link to the original data source will be provided in the picture index.

Many thanks in advance!

Kind regards, Ulrike Harant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uharant (talk • contribs) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Monitorul Oficial al României. Partea I 2004-11-12, nr. 1050.pdf

File:Monitorul Oficial al României. Partea I 2004-11-12, nr. 1050.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~riley (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nicolae Ionescu - Pretzel vendors in uniform in front of the Triumph Arch.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Stema Republicii Socialiste Romania.png

File:Stema Republicii Socialiste Romania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Mixing up of author in Category:Books by Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino etc.?

Could you have a look at the two books in Category:Books by Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino? To me it seems that you have mixed up Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino (Q5556347) and Gheorghe Cantacuzino-Grănicerul (Q2292131). If this is the case a renaming/moving of the files, the category, its parent category and Creator:Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino might be necessary. I can help with doing this, just, I'm not sure about the actual name of the author. Thanks in advance, --Marsupium (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

The first book seems to be a historical work by Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino (Q5556347) and the second one says it's by General Cantacuzino, so it must be Gheorghe Cantacuzino-Grănicerul (Q2292131). Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

You mean File:Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino - Legăturile între civilizațiile orientală și occidentală în lumea antică.pdf is by Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino (Q5556347)? But the edition seems to be from 1929 and Gheorghe I. Cantacuzino (Q5556347) was born in 1937 only? Where is the mistake? Could you have another look and maybe fix the file descriptions for the two files? Thanks a lot, --Marsupium (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)