User talk:Martin Kraft

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Martin Kraft!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Martin Kraft!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Martin Kraft,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Wegen Farbe[edit]

Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 IS II USM

Hallo, was meinst du hier mit "isolated version"? Falls es das ist, was ich vermute: habe in Photoshop über "Farbe ersetzen" schon versucht, den Hintergrund 100% weiß zu machen (im Moment ist er ein wenig dunkler als weiß). Ging leider nicht. RAW ist auch noch vorhanden. Kannst du verraten, wie man das am besten hinkriegt? - A.Savin 12:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich meinte eigentlich klassisches Freistellen, also den Hintergrund aus mit einer (z.B. mit dem Zauberstab oder dem automatisch Maskieren-Werkzeug erstellten) Maske auszuwählen und dann zu löschen bzw. durch weiß zu ersetzen. Manchmal bietet es sich danach an einen Schatten einzufügen.
Du kannst ja mal was rumprobieren. Wenn Du dann noch Probleme damit hast, kannst Du mir gerne das RAW schicken und ich schau mal, was sich machen läßt. -- Martin Kraft (talk) 12:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Habe rumprobiert. [1] Besser jetzt? - A.Savin 14:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Das Freistellen hat ja super geklappt.
Ich persönlich würde jetzt noch den Kontrast etwas anziehn und den kompletten Tonwertbereich nutzen. Am Einfachsten geht das, wenn Du Dir in Photoshop eine Gradationskurven-Einstellungsebene erstellst und die Enden der Kurve jeweils an den Rand des benutzten Histogrammsbereichs legst... -- Martin Kraft (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Wir habend as Bild mittlerweile zusammen überarbeitet. Das Ergebnis findet Ihr hier.

oval cut out[edit]

I used a closeup glass DCR250 while capturing very small subjects from a closer distance (just 4 inch). It is good but cause vignetting above 5MP because of the LA3 adapter that connects them. Here these 2 subjects require entire 10MP so I have to crop the corners.

[2]

Regards, Jkadavoor (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Original file after NR is uploaded at: [3] so that anyone interested can try some edits. I'm very weak in PP so somewhat managed to this oval crop. :) - Jkadavoor (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I prefer the original version to the oval one. I would rather retouch the black parts or leave it as it is. The blured Vinget could be seen as part of the background ;)
But I would suggest to lift the exposure a bit to strengthen the difference between the butterflies and the background. --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Could you do an edit in your idea and show me. Removing the black parts for a huge area is difficult to me. Some experiments on the vignetting may nice.
And on the exposure: The light was little due to the place where they perched, and spot metering due to the white color. May I increase the brightness?
Thanks for your suggestions. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I just tested the brand new Photoshop and CameraRAW Beta using your picture. You'll find the result of th retouching on the gallery at the top of this page. --Martin Kraft (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Like this; thanks. I have a few more pictures like this; will upload soon. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DieFaelscher-Premiere.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DieFaelscher-Premiere.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zur Kenntnisnahme[edit]

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Martin_Kraft_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs_.C2.B7_deleted_contribs_.C2.B7_logs_.C2.B7_edit_filter_log_.C2.B7_block_user_.C2.B7_block_log.29 --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome in the wonderful world of Taxiarchos/Wladyslaw :))))--Jebulon (talk) 17:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
This guy really ruined my weekend, and I am pretty sure, he's proud on that :( --Martin Kraft (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Don't worry about that, have a look all around in the history of Commons, you are not alone ! Try to decline a picture of him, and you will know what hell is ! Some of us call this: soft terror. But you will soon know all about the marvelous city of Lörrach ! Lol ! Anyway, alles gut, keep going.--Jebulon (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Need another help[edit]

Jamides bochus by kadavoor

Dear Martin, what is the possibilities on this? Could you make an attempt? Jkadavoor (talk) 09:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I simply haven't the time to provide you with retouches like this again. My last example was ment to show, what is possible. So I would suggest to you now, to familiarise yourself with retouching-techniques in Photoshop (or Gimp). -- Martin Kraft (talk) 09:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
OK, thanks and sorry for the disturbance. I will try myself or raise a request in the graphics lab. Thanks, Jkadavoor (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Psyche Leptosia nina mating retouched.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Psyche Leptosia nina mating retushed.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AmorgosEastCoast.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AmorgosEastCoast.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Harp.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harp.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Harfe.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harfe.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WappenLoewe Bad Bergzabern.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WappenLoewe Bad Bergzabern.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zum Engel Bad Bergzabern.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zum Engel Bad Bergzabern.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stadtkirche Annweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtkirche Annweiler.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ARD Karte[edit]

Lies mal bitte meinen Diskussionsbeitrag auf der Diskussionsseite der ARD Karte. --Radiohörer (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jeanne Balibar Berlinale 2007.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeanne Balibar Berlinale 2007.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fluchtwege Johannisnacht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fluchtwege Johannisnacht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Einrücken[edit]

Was soll das eigentlich immer? Ich rücke meine Beiträge richtig ein ! Warum musst du das eigentlich immer korrigieren? --Radiohörer (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

In der Wiki-Welt ist es üblich, seine Diskussionsbeiträge so einzurücken, dass sie sich vom vorherigen Diskussionsbeitrag abheben (i.d.R. einen Tab tiefer). Du rückst (im Gegensatz zu so ziemlich allen Anderen) Deine Posts aber immer genauso tief wie den vorherigen Beitrag ein und das macht es den Lesern der Diskussion unötig schwer, zu erkennen, wo welcher Beitrag beginnt bzw. endet. Schau Dir mal meine Korrekturen in der Versionsgeschichte an, dann siehst Du, was ich meine! --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Überschreibung von Bildbearbeitungen[edit]

Moin.

Wie schon in der Fotowerkstatt geschrieben: Überschreibe bitte nicht die Arbeit von anderen Usern! Du kannst jederzeit auch einen Upload einstellen, aber Du hast sicherlich nicht einfach so zu entscheiden, wessen Bearbeitung Du "duldest" und wessen nicht :-/ -- Mario Link (talk) 16:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Wie ich ebenfalls in der Fotowerkstatt geschrieben habe:
»Ich hätte meine Version ja wie gesagt als Alternative eingestellt, wenn Du nicht bereits selbst die Ursprungsversion überschrieben hättest. Ich habe diese daher wieder in den Ursprungszustand zurückversetzt, werde meinen Vorschlag nun bei Commons hochladen und würde Dich bitten das Gleiche zutun. Dann können wir hier wie üblich vergleichen.«
Und jetzt würde ich Dich bitten Deinen letzten Revert rückgängig zu machen, also das Photo wieder auf die Ursprungsversion zu setzen und Deine eigene Version stattdessen auch als Alternative einzustellen! Immerhin warst Du ja der erste, der hier »die Arbeit von anderen Usern« überschrieben hat. --Martin Kraft (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Ich habe keine andere Bearbeitung eines Users überschrieben, das ist der Punkt. Ich habe lediglich wunschgemäß und nach Anfrage in der Fotowerkstatt eine Bearbeitung eines eingestellten Fotos vorgenommen, das drüberladen der ersten Bearbeitung ist nichts ungewöhnliches, oft sogar Wunsch der Antragsteller. Selbstverständlich werden dann aber mit weiteren Bearbeitungen nicht vorherige Bearbeitungen anderer User obsolet gemacht, nur weil sie Dir zufällig nicht gefallen. Statt einfach wortlos drüber zu laden, hättest Du also (wie alle anderen es dort auch immer machen) eine zusätzliche Alternative Einstellen können. Ebenso hättest Du mich erst mal ansprechen können, wenn Du ein Problem mit einer Bearbeitung hast. Oder einfach eine Anmerkung im dortigen Abschnitt schreiben können. Einfach zu entscheiden, was genehm ist und was nicht steht Dir nicht zu. Zumal Du nicht derjenige bist, der die Bearbeitung angefragt hat und/oder das Original hochgeladen hat.
Ich betrachte Dein wiederholtes überschreiben/zurücksetzen/etc. inzwischen als Vandalismus und werde das dementsprechend auch so melden, solltest Du deine sture, bevormundende Handlungsweise so beibehalten. -- Mario Link (talk) 00:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Deine Vorstellungen von Fairness und Wikikette sind schon irgendwie skurril. Aber wenn Du mich wegen Vandalismus anschwärzen möchtest, nur zu: Es wird sicher spannend herauszufinden, was die Admins für gerechtfertigt halten:
  • Das mehrfache Einspielen einer eigenen verschlimmbesserten Version über das Original, trotz bestehender Alternativen und eines noch offenen Diskussionstandes?
  • Oder das mehrfache Zurücksetzen auf die Ursprungsversion, um eben diese offene Diskussion zu ermöglichen?
Ich habe übrigens jeden meiner Schritte in der Fotowerkstatt kommentiert und dort sollte diese Diskussion auch weitergehn. --Martin Kraft (talk) 08:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

File:Psyche Leptosia nina mating retushed.jpg that you retouched has been promoted as an FP. Congrats and thank you for your efforts. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that notice and congrats back to you --Martin Kraft (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CelebrityReflection.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CelebrityReflection.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirchberg am Wechsel Wolfgangskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg am Wechsel Wolfgangskirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FPC: Breisacher Munster Hochaltar[edit]

Hallo Martin Kraft,

kannst Du mir bitte erklären, welche Christusfigur ich herausgeschnitten haben soll? Der Altar hat nämlich keine. Ansonsten hilft vielleicht auch ein Blick in kultur- und kunstgeschichtliche Zusammenhänge. Die Krönungsszene ist ein im Mittelalter zentral behandeltes Thema und mit Verlaub: die Füße sind nicht das wesentliche Merkmale sondern die Krönung und der Gesichtsausdruck beider Figuren, welche diesen Altar zu einem der ausdrucksstärksten im Südwestdeutschen Raum machen. Und genau das thematisiert das Bild, meines Erachtens auch würdig genug, dass es bei FP kandidiert. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Auf der Aufnahme des gesamten Altars sieht man zu beiden Seiten Marias jeweils eine gekrönte männliche Person. Ich bin sicher kein Fachmann in mittelalterlicher Ikonografie, aber wenn der ältere Rauschebart rechts Gott-Vater ist, ist der Jünger links wohl sein Sohn, Jesus. Und den hast Du offensichtlich weggeschnitten, obwohl er ebenfalls die Krone hält und damit ein, wie ich finde, essentielle Bestandteil dieser Krönungsszene ist.
Was die Bildwirkung angeht, sind wir offensichtlich unterschiedlicher Meinung: Ich finde Ausschnitt und Perspektive jedenfalls nicht sonderlich exzellent. --Martin Kraft (talk) 19:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

BMW Vierzylinder.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Vierzylinder.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tempelhof Radarturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempelhof Radarturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kurhaus Wiesbaden Portikus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurhaus Wiesbaden Portikus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kurhaus(Wiesbaden).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurhaus(Wiesbaden).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

BowlingGreen(Wiesbaden).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BowlingGreen(Wiesbaden).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen![edit]

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Martin Kraft,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Martin Kraft,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Johann Christian Senckenberg-bust three-quarters.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann Christian Senckenberg-bust three-quarters.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

B49 Neuhäusel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B49 Neuhäusel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marktportal Mainzer Dom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktportal Mainzer Dom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blohm+Voss Dock11 frontal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blohm+Voss Dock11 frontal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Johann Christian Senckenberg-bust frontal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann Christian Senckenberg-bust frontal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blohm+Voss Dock11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blohm+Voss Dock11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 00:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Danke für das Vertrauen --Martin Kraft (talk) 00:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hessischer Landtag-Hof und Plenargebäude.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag-Hof und Plenargebäude.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stadtschloss Wiesbaden-Wintergarten.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtschloss Wiesbaden-Wintergarten.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hessischer Landtag-Plenum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag-Plenum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hessischer Landtag-Innenhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag-Innenhof.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hessischer Landtag - Plenarsaal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessicher Landtag-Plenarsaal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Volker Bouffier im Landtag 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volker Bouffier im Landtag 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Big Bertha Projectile.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Bertha Projectile.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

WGM Rastatt-Uniforms.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WGM Rastatt-Uniforms.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

WGM Rastatt-Armours.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WGM Rastatt-Armours.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WGM Rastatt-Gechütz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WGM Rastatt-Gechütz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

WGM Rastatt-Middle Ages.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WGM Rastatt-Middle Ages.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WGM Rastatt-Blankwaffen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WGM Rastatt-Blankwaffen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schloss Rastatt-Goldener Mann.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Rastatt-Goldener Mann.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg-Treppenhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg-Treppenhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kornmarkt Heidelberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornmarkt Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Muhammad Yunus-Schlachthof Wiesbaden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muhammad Yunus-Schlachthof Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mosburg-Biebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosburg-Biebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pfingstturnier-2013-Dressurplatz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfingstturnier-2013-Dressurplatz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oranier-Gedächtniskirche-Biebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranier-Gedächtniskirche-Biebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich von Thiersch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich von Thiersch.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich von Thiersch-framed.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich von Thiersch-framed.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mosburg-Biebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosburg-Biebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pfingstturnier-2013-Dressurplatz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfingstturnier-2013-Dressurplatz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oranier-Gedächtniskirche-Biebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranier-Gedächtniskirche-Biebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich von Thiersch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich von Thiersch.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich von Thiersch-framed.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich von Thiersch-framed.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cigogne et deux poussins[edit]

Hi,
Thanks for your edits, by the way if you want the raw file, it's here. Regards.--— D Y O L F 77Nuvola apps kmail.png[Talk] 10:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the RAW. Now I uploaded an directly processed version. --Martin Kraft (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Finde ich eine Frechheit[edit]

Kirche von Oberwirbach.JPG

Sehr geehrter Herr Kraft Wer gibt Ihnen das Recht an meinem Foto der Oberwirbacher Kirche herumzupfuschen. Sind Sie Mitglied eines "Wikipedia-Kartells" oder woher nehmen Sie diese Arroganz?

Hochachtungsvoll Heiko Reichenbächer -- nicht signierter Beitrag von IP 78.55.101.79 (09:14, 2. Jun. 2013‎)

Werter Herr Reichenbächer Auch wenn ich in dem, was sie da geschrieben haben, wenig „Hochachtung“ erkennen kann...
Es tut mir leid, wenn sie sich durch meinen Edit an diesem Photo so gestört fühlen. Ich kann jedoch in keinster Weise den Ton und die Verschörungstheorien nachvollziehen, die Sie hier anschlagen. Es gibt hier kein Wikipedia-Kartell, und wenn dann würden sie als jemand, der hier editiert und Bilder winstellt, wohl auch dazugehören.
Sie (ich vermute mal das Sie Franzjaeger39, der Urheber dieses Bildes sind?) haben Ihr Photo unter der folgenden Lizenz eingestellt und damit zugestimmt, dass andere Nutzer (aber auch völlig Unbeteiligte) dieses Bild unter Wahrung der Lizenzbedingungen weiterverwenden und auch editieren dürfen. Wenn sie das nicht wollen, hätten sie es nicht tun dürfen. Jetzt ist es für einen Rückzieher zu spät – eine einmal erteilte freie Lizenz kann man nicht mehr zurücknehmen:
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
  • share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

Ich für meinen Teil, habe nur auf eine Anfrage in der Fotowerkstatt reagiert und das Bild grade gestellt und farbkorrigiert. Streng genommen sollten sie mir eigentlich dankbar sein, dass ich Ihr Bild verbessert habe. Schließlich kann davon nicht nur der Arikel profitieren, in dem dieses Bild eingebunden wurde, sondern auch Sie, der Sie natürlich auch das verbesserte Bild weiterverwenden können.
Nichts für ungut... --Martin Kraft (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St.Marien-Biebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Marien-Biebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pfingstturnier-2013-Tribuene.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfingstturnier-2013-Tribuene.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bismarck-Denkmal Nerotal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bismarck-Denkmal Nerotal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal portrait.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal portrait.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marktkirche closeup.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktkirche closeup.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Ladenburg_in_HD.svg[edit]

Gefällt dir das? Bitte dort Stellungnahme- sonst mache ich die anderen Karten nich' :-) --TUBSMail-closed.svg 08:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Soweit ich das überblicken kann, sitzt jetzt alles richtig. Und die Gewässer sind auch viel detailierter geworden ;) Vielen Dank für die Mühen! --Martin Kraft (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal closeup.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal closeup.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal landscape.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Nerotal landscape.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus group.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus group.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus close.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus close.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus wide.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus wide.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus medium.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Kurhaus medium.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Marktkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willem-Alexander Wiesbaden Marktkirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Appropriately Licensed[edit]

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Robert-Werner-Haus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robert-Werner-Haus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schwesig[edit]

Ahoi Martin, ich habe jetzt alle meine Making of-Bilder fertig und müsste nochmal wissen, welche Fotos von dem Pressesprecher von Frau Schwesig abgesegnet wurden um sie weiterzuleiten. Danke und Gruß Jonas Rogowski (talk) 15:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wasserturm Schlachthof Wiesbaden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm Schlachthof Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI Candidates[edit]

I'm surprised that you propose to QI 26 images. Have you checked any? We must to see your images?, why?

Please, discuss at least one image for each proposal.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh, sorry for that. Usually I am always reviewing some images when I'm on QIC, but this time it was just a lack of time. This 26 are just the first crop of that WP-Landtagsprojekt. --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
No problem... Sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for hogging the thread. My only beef with nominating a whole batch of pics at the same time is that it gets difficult to comment or vote on one specific image. For instance I just voted for one of your pics of Egbert Liskow, but I had to check several times because you proposed three pics of Mr Liskow at 15:24. Perhaps you could number them or change your descriptions a bit, so we can know which is which? Thanks for the great job anyway. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The QInominator-Tool I use to nominate my images, automaticly takes the description from the images detail page. And it's not wise to use a numbering there.
But since the images have different file names, it should be easy to tell them appart, while checking them via QIVoter or on their detials-Page?! --Martin Kraft (talk) 08:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
You can edit the descriptions in the QI nominator tool; I do it all the time because my descriptions are quite lengthy. As for the file names, you have to check several files to notice how they differ from each other, or copy the whole file name and then search for it on the vote page. Of course it's not insurmontable; it's just a little inconvenient. I don't understand the QIVoter part; I'll look into it. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
I'vs just discovered the QIVoter feature. Never mind my remark, then. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Till Backhaus SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Till Backhaus SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Peter Ritter Linke.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Ritter Linke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Karen Stramm Linke crop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karen Stramm Linke crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Egbert Liskow CDU 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egbert Liskow CDU 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Burkhard Lenz CDU 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burkhard Lenz CDU 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thomas Krüger SPD crop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Krüger SPD crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maria Steinhagen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Steinhagen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fritz Tack Linke.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fritz Tack Linke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Georg Strätker.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georg Strätker.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Karen Stramm Linke.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karen Stramm Linke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Detlef Müller SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detlef Müller SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Egbert Liskow CDU 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egbert Liskow CDU 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Egbert Liskow CDU 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egbert Liskow CDU 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Johann-Georg Jaeger Grüne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann-Georg Jaeger Grüne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Johann-Georg Jaeger Grüne full.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann-Georg Jaeger Grüne full.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Burkhard Lenz CDU 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burkhard Lenz CDU 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Burkhard Lenz CDU 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burkhard Lenz CDU 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bernd Schubert CDU 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernd Schubert CDU 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heino Schütt 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heino Schütt 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heino Schütt 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heino Schütt 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Andreas Texter CDU.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andreas Texter CDU.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stefanie Drese SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stefanie Drese SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jochen Schulte SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jochen Schulte SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jörg Heydorn SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jörg Heydorn SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bernd Schubert CDU.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernd Schubert CDU.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bronzekruzifix-KlosterEberbach.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bronzekruzifix-KlosterEberbach.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

IngelheimerAue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IngelheimerAue.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wappen Stadtschloss Wiesbaden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappen Stadtschloss Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Biebricher Wasserturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebricher Wasserturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hikmat Al-Sabty Linke 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikmat Al-Sabty Linke 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hikmat Al-Sabty Linke 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikmat Al-Sabty Linke 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jörg Heydorn SPD 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jörg Heydorn SPD 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heike Polzin SPD 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heike Polzin SPD 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Norbert Nieszery SPD 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norbert Nieszery SPD 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helmut Holter Linke 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helmut Holter Linke 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI candidates[edit]

As noted 2 months ago, please do not mass-nominate images like that - it's really just spamming. I tend to figure 6 is a maximum per person per day. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:48, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for any inconvenience. But to my understanding QIC is a method to assess all images of a certain quality, not a contest like FPC?!
So there is no need to restrict nominations and no guideline recommending that. Given that all the images I nominated fit the QI-criteria, I don't understand the allegation of flooding. The more quality images, the better for Commons and the Wikipedia, right?!
If you, for whatever reason, consider this to be problematic, you should try to add an corresponding rule to the QIC-guidelines. Otherwise there will be ongoing missunderstandings like this. // Martin Kraft (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
It's common courtesy frankly. I have 3000 images I want to nominate for QI, but I don't doubt that if I dumped all 3000 in a single day you'd call it spamming. Commons runs more on established norms and courtesy than on strict rules like enwp - and an established norm is that nominating a lot of images for QI is being rude. However, I checked, and this is in the guideline: Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Now you quoted the exact phrase, I also found the guidelines myself and apologise for not acting upon it. I would suggest to highlight this guideline – not everybody is as patient as you are.
Do you suggest that I remove some of the nominations? // Martin Kraft (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
What's done is done, but don't be surprised if a fair few don't get reviewed. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Martina Tegtmeier SPD q.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martina Tegtmeier SPD q.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Beate Schlupp CDU.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beate Schlupp CDU.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Armin Jäger CDU 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armin Jäger CDU 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Beate Schlupp CDU 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beate Schlupp CDU 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jürgen Suhr Grüne 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jürgen Suhr Grüne 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Helmut Holter Linke 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helmut Holter Linke 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tilo Gundlack SPD 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilo Gundlack SPD 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Waldmüller CDU 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EOS70D 18-135STM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D 18-135STM.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Simone Oldenburg Linke 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simone Oldenburg Linke 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heinz Müller SPD 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinz Müller SPD 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Margret Seemann SPD 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margret Seemann SPD 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Margret Seemann SPD 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margret Seemann SPD 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EOS70D 18-135STM top.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D 18-135STM top.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EOS70D 18-135STM display.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D 18-135STM display.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EOS70D 18-135STM flash.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D 18-135STM flash.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EOS70D top.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D top.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EOS70D left.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D left.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EOS70D right.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D right.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EOS70D front.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D front.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EOS70D back.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EOS70D back.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Bühne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Bühne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Ziergitter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Ziergitter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Lampe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Lampe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Säulen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Säulen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Detail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Streckweiher-Herbst-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Streckweiher-Herbst-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Streckweiher-Herbst-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Streckweiher-Herbst-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Uschi-Obermaier Michael-Sahr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uschi-Obermaier Michael-Sahr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Westerwaldsteig-Plakette.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerwaldsteig-Plakette.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Michael Sahr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Sahr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uschi-Obermaier Buchmesse 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uschi-Obermaier Buchmesse 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Das-blaue-Sofa Uschi-Obermaier Michael-Sahr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Das-blaue-Sofa Uschi-Obermaier Michael-Sahr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uschi-Obermaier Buchmesse 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uschi-Obermaier Buchmesse 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Martin Kraft,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ChristianLindner-FDP-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChristianLindner-FDP-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ChristianLindner-FDP-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChristianLindner-FDP-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fraglich[edit]

Hallo Martin Kraft,

ich weiß nicht, was es hier nicht zu verstehen gibt bzw. was du hier als "Kritik am Bild" versuchst darzustellen. Im DR geht es um die Frage, ob die urheberrechtlich geschützte Fotografie Beiwerk i.S.d. UrhG ist oder nicht. Ich habe dort lediglich die Position des Anwalts wiedergegeben. Du glaubst es nicht, stattdessen versuchst Du mit irgendwelchen "Bauernregeln" deine Rechtsauffassung plastisch zu umschreiben. Du darfst ja glauben was du willst, ich brauche es nicht zu tun. Kein Grund, hier weiter im Kreis zu rühen. Zur "Kritikfähigkeit" gehört nach meiner Auffassung auch, zwei konträre Positionen auch mal stehen zu lassen, wenn es nichts weiteres zu sagen gibt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Das eine beleuchtet Stele, prominent in den goldenen Schnitt einer Nachtaufnahmen gesetzt, kein „unwesentliches Beiwerk“ im Sinn der Urheberrechts ist, müssen wir hier nicht wirklich noch ein drittes Mal diskutieren. Dass ist nicht nur ziemlich offensichtlich, sondern wurde auch auf Commons und in der de:WP von mehreren Nutzern festgestellt.
Was mich aber wirklich stört und was Diskussionen mit Dir anstrengend (vielleicht sogar sinnlos) macht, ist, dass Dir offensichtlich jede Kritikfähigkeit fehlt. Von unserem ersten Aufeinandertreffen bis heute, kann ich mich an keine einzige Situation erinnern, in der Du auf Kritik einfach mal mit Einsicht reagiert und Deine eigene Position hinterfragt bzw. angepasst hast. Stattdessen verteidigst Du jedes Deiner Bilder unnachgiebig und biegst Dir dabei eine „Wahrheit“ zurecht die mit der Realität häufig wenig zu tun hat (z.B. den angeblicht erdfarbenen Braunton auf der Fassade des Vitrahauses).--Martin Kraft (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Der juristische Sinn des Wortes "unwesentlich" und der gestalterische Sinn sind nicht zwingend deckungsgleich. Rechtssprechung funktioniert nicht nach Bauernregeln oder persönlichen Empfindungen (gerade das macht es auch so schwierig, bestimmte Sachverhalte manchmal auch richtig einzuordnen) sondern ist der Widerstreit zwischen verschiedenen Interessen/Regeln und Gesetzen. Ziel dieses Paragrafen ist es, urheberrechtlich geschütztes Material zu schützen und in diesem Fall gibt es klare Anhaltspunkte, dass dieser Schtutz, der ja völlig zu recht besteht, nicht verletzt wird. Wir müssen und werden hier nicht übereinkommen. Kein Grund, mir hier ein sinnloses Diskutieren vorzuwerfen. Ganz im Gegenteil: wenn du das wirklich denkst, frage ich mich, wieso du nicht nur einfach deine Meinung platzierst, sondern Diskussionen auch noch weiter ziehst.
Alle anderen von dir verlinkten Beispiele sind ebenso Beispiele, wo man unterschiedlicher Auffassung sein darf. Deine Farbthese fürs Vitrahaus wird auch dann nicht richtiger wenn man sich nach Wochen wiederholt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Siehst Du?! Genau das mein' ich! --Martin Kraft (talk) 09:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Es tut mir leid, dass ich mich weder deiner fragwürdigen Rechtsauffassung noch deine Farbauffassung teilen kann. Damit stehe ich übrigens auch nicht alleine da. Würde mal sagen, wir lassen es dabei bewenden. Im übrigen bin ich hier nicht in das Forum beigetreten, um es jedem Recht zu machen. Das war und wird nie mein Anspruch sein. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland[edit]

WLM-2012 Winner in Germany.jpg
Hallo Martin Kraft,

etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Die Preise werden durch das Team Communitys von Wikimedia Deutschland verschickt. Bei Fragen kannst du dich jederzeit per mail an community@wikimedia.de wenden.
Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?
Ein besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir,
Anika (talk) 14:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! Ich fühle mich geehrt und freu mich schon auf die Preise ;) Ich wünsch auch Euch einen schönen Advent und bin natürlich nächstes Jahr wieder dabei. --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch für den 5. Platz! --Atamari (talk) 18:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Martin, dem Glückwunsch zum internationalen Erfolg für ein großartiges Foto schließe ich mich an. --Wiegels (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
... und das trotz (oder gerade wegen?) des Kollegen hinter der Säule! Ich hoffe jetzt ärgerst du dich nicht mehr Face-wink.svg. Gratulation! Anika (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Falls du dich fragst, woher die Kollegen das wissen --> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org/and-the-winner-is-2/
Hey, danke für die Glückwünsche - freue mich riesig :) --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Martin Kraft,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Westen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Westen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Helena von Konstantinopel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Helena von Konstantinopel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schloss Bruchsal-Nebendienstdienerbau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Bruchsal-Nebendienstdienerbau.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Bruchsal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Bruchsal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Bruchsal-Kirchturm-Kavalierbau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Bruchsal-Kirchturm-Kavalierbau.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wiesbaden-Taunusstraße 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesbaden-Taunusstraße 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiesbaden-Gustav-Freytag-Straße 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesbaden-Gustav-Freytag-Straße 9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abtei Marienstatt Langhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Marienstatt Langhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zollhafen Mainz-Weinlagergebäude Südmole.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zollhafen Mainz-Weinlagergebäude Südmole.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Bruchsal-Hofapotheke-Kirchturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Bruchsal-Hofapotheke-Kirchturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schloss Bruchsal-Kavalierbau-Kirchturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Bruchsal-Kavalierbau-Kirchturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Schloss Bruchsal-Kavalierbau-Kirchturm.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schloss Bruchsal-Kavalierbau-Kirchturm.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ausstellungsgebäude Mathildenhöhe-Kuppel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ausstellungsgebäude Mathildenhöhe-Kuppel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hochzeitsturm frontal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochzeitsturm frontal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sonnenuhr Hochzeitsturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuhr Hochzeitsturm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hochzeitsturm Relief.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochzeitsturm Relief.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Neuer Hessicher Landtag[edit]

2009-2013
2014-2018

Erstellst du noch eine Fortschreibung dieser Datei für den 18. Januar? --SBT (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Ja, das hab ich vor. Leider gibt es von Seiten des Landtags immer noch keine Sitzverteilung, die man als Vorgabe nehmen könnte – ohne die ist ja nichtmal klar, wie jetzt die Fraktionen angeordnet werden. Ich hab gestern erst da angerufen, wurde aber auf Ende Januar vertröstet.
Bist Du eigentlich am 18. eigentlich vor Ort? Ich hab mich gestern bei der Gelegenheit mal als Photograph angemeldet und hoffe eine Akkreditierung zu bekommen. Falls Du Akkreditierungsunterlagen brauchst, kann ich Dir die gerne zuschicken. --Martin Kraft (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Ein kleine Ergänzung zu "Hessischer Landtag 2014–2018.svg": Der Hessische Landtag hat eine fünfjährige Legislaturperiode und ist von 2014-2019 gewählt. Genauso ist der 18. Landtag bis Anfang 2014 (17. Januar 2014) gewählt gewesen. --79.211.141.180 14:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Kuppel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Kuppel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Nordwesten.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griechische Kapelle Wiesbaden-Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Zollhafen Mainz-Weinlagergebäude Südmole.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zollhafen Mainz-Weinlagergebäude Südmole.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zollhafen Mainz-Weinlagergebäude Südmole.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Überschärft[edit]

Oversharped?

Guten Morgen Martin, wo siehst du auf dem Bild eine Überschärfung? Wenn ich mich nicht irre, habe ich es nicht einmal nachgeschärft – wenn, dann bloß leicht. Meinst du damit vielleicht die natürlich feinkörnige Oberfläche? Viele Grüße --Anıl Ö. (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

@Anıl Öztaş: Diese „Überschärfung“ ist mir weniger auf der Oberfläche des Steckers, als viel mehr an seinen und seines Schattens Kanten aufgefallen – da sind nämlich in der 100% Ansicht deutlich dunkle Ränder sichtbar. Wahrscheinlich ist das nicht mal allein auf ein bewusstes Nachschärfen zurückzuführen, sondern auf all die Bildbearbeitungsschritte (wie schärfen, Entrauschen, Gradation), die die Kamera auch automatisch durchgeführt haben könnte. Jedenfalls wirkt das Bild angesichts des zudem noch sehr hohen Kontrasts und der Freistellung irgendwie nachgezeichnet.
Hast Du noch ein RAW oder die wenigstens das Ausgangs-JPG, so dass man da noch etwas nachbessern kann? --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Lieber Martin, vielen Dank für deine Erklärung – ich denke ich weiß nun, was du gemeint hast. Bei diesen Bildern handelt es sich um meine ersten Versuche bezüglich solcher Aufnahmen mit weißem Hintergrund. Leider habe ich nicht in RAW fotografiert, die ursprüngliche JPG-Datei liegt jedoch noch vor. Sollte ich sie als neue Version des Bildes hochladen und anschließend zurücksetzen? Dann könnte man auf diese zurückgreifen, ohne sie als eigenständige Datei hochzuladen. Viele Grüße --Anıl Ö. (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
@Anıl Öztaş: Ja mach das - ich schau sie mir dann mal an. --Martin Kraft (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Danke, so habe ich es gemacht. Viele Grüße --Anıl Ö. (talk) 19:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Hab mich mal dran versucht. --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Danke sehr, habe es soeben gesehen und finde die Konturen jetzt auch ansehlicher. Den Hintergrund unmittelbar um den Klinkenstecker habe ich jetzt auch nochmal freigestellt und denke, jetzt passt es. :-) Viele Grüße --Anıl Ö. (talk) 22:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Gern geschehn. Setz das Bild auf QIC einfach nochmal auf Nominated und lösch meine Bewertung. Ich selbst bin ja jetzt befangen ;) --Martin Kraft (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alexander Vogt-SPD-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Vogt-SPD-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Alexander Vogt-SPD-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Vogt-SPD-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ina Spanier-Oppermann-SPD-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ina Spanier-Oppermann-SPD-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dietmar-Brockes-FDP.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dietmar-Brockes-FDP.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dietmar Brockes-FDP-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dietmar Brockes-FDP-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cagliari Kathedrale.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cagliari Kathedrale.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Playa de Ojos - Fuerteventura.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Playa de Ojos - Fuerteventura.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Playa de Ojos - Fuerteventura.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DelosPanorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DelosPanorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kabinett Bouffier II-Ernennung-Totale.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabinett Bouffier II-Ernennung-Totale.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kabinett Bouffier II-Ernennung.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabinett Bouffier II-Ernennung.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hessischer Landtag 2014–2018.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag 2014–2018.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hessischer Landtag 2009–2013.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag 2009–2013.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Idee[edit]

nur so gesponnen... Wir 4, die Frau van Kampen bekannt sind, fahren kurzfristig für 2 Tage nach Brüssel, um mit Tele all die Abgeordneten zu fotografieren, die wir nicht erwischt haben. Noch vor den Wahlen. Was meinst du? --Ralf Roleček 10:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

@Ralf Roletschek: Puh – grundsätzlich ja. Allerdings sind die doch in Brüssel garnicht im Plenum sondern nur in den Ausschüssen, oder?
Ob ich persönlich das überhaupt zeitlich einrichten kann, hängt ganz davon ab wann das genau wäre. Bis zur Wahl im Mai ist ja nochwas hin – lass uns also in Mainz nochmal drüberreden.
P.S.: Hast Du mitbekommen, was Leila mit ihrem Kurierbeitrag losgetreten hat? --Martin Kraft (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich hab da gestern noch als Pölkky geantwortet. Ausschüsse stimmt. Ich frag mal bei Frau van Kampen, ob und wann das sinnvoll wäre. --Ralf Roleček 11:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

VIS promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Canon EOS 70D.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Canon EOS 70D.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Krim 2014 de.svg[edit]

Hallo Martin Kraft! Danke für die tolle Karte, dadurch erhält man endlich mal einen vernünftigen Überblick welcher Ort wo liegt. :-) Was mMn noch fehlt ist eine Maßstabsleiste. Könntest du eine einbauen? Dass die Halbinsel nämlich weit über 200 km in Ost-West-Ausdehnung breit ist erkennt man auf deiner und auf allen anderen Karten die man in den Nachrichten gezeigt bekommt leider nicht. Ich musste selber erstmal bei Google Maps messen und hatte mir das Gebiet deutlich kleiner vorgestellt. Viele Grüße! --BauingBob (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Da mir die Karte auch sehr gut gefallen hat, habe ich sie für den Exzellenzstatus nominiert. Siehe hier. Viele Grüße --Excolis (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
@BauingBob: @Excolis: Danke für die Blumen ;)
Einen Maßstab habe ich gerade eingebaut. --Martin Kraft (talk) 19:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Perfekt, genau so hatte ich mir das vorgestellt. Danke :-) Grüße! --BauingBob (talk) 22:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Olympiazeltdach.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2014 Olympiazeltdach.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 14:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal[edit]

Hallo Martin.
Zunächst einmal möchte ich mich entschuldigen das ich mich erst jetzt und hier, und nicht auf der Kandidatenseite zu meiner dortigen Begründung äußere, aber ich war leider ziemlich beschäftigt im RL und habs letzte Woche echt nicht mehr geschafft.
Dein Bild hat es ja mittlerweile geschafft und wurde ausgezeichnet. Glückwunsch dazu! Und ich will auch nicht falsch verstanden worden sein, es ist wirklich ein schönes Bild, welches verdient ausgezeichnet wurde!
Meine Formulierung "better light" war wirklich sehr ungünstig gewählt! Allerdings hab ich irgendwie selbst im deutschen meine Probleme das in Worte zu fassen. Mir ging es eigentlich darum, dass mir das Licht gerade in den hellen Bereichen (Kronleuchter und Fenster) irgendwie "zu doll" erscheint. Ich kanns auch echt schlecht beschreiben, es ist ja, laut LR zumindest, nahezu "perfekt" entwickelt, LR zeigt mir jedenfalls nichts ausgefressenes oder abgesoffenes an. Irgendwie sagt es mir so wie es ist trotzdem nicht zu. Schwer zu beschreiben, sorry! Ist es eigentlich ein single shot oder eine Fusion o.ä.?
Zu der Auflösungssache, auch mit deiner 40D und dem UWW hättest du bei den Bedingungen ein Pano versuchen können, oder?! Oder nicht mal mit dem UWW sondern eventuell mit ner Festbrennweite mit noch besseren Abbildungseigenschaften?! Der Raum/Saal wäre es mMn wert gewesen! Die aufwendige Verzierung, das fantastische Deckengemälde... In solchen Details verliere ich mich gerne bei solchen Aufnahmen! Und dafür bietet sich eine höhere Auflösung einfach an.
Ich hoffe ich konnte dir meinen Standpunkt halbwegs erklären und entschuldige mich nochmals für die lange Verzögerung. bg mathias K 22:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

@Leviathan1983: Danke für Deine Rückmeldung.
  • Die Lichter habe ich beim Entwickeln schon gewaltig runterziehen müssen. Auf einem direkt von der Kamera kommenden JPG wärend a wohl nur ausgebrannt Kleckse zu sehen gewesen. Das sie immer noch so strahlen entspricht der Realität vor Ort und ist bei direkten Lichtquellen eigentlich auch nicht anders zu erwarten.
  • Was die Auflösung angeht hätte man natürlich ein Bild aus x 50mm-Aufnahmen stichen können statt es mit einer 10mm Aufnahme abzubilden. Ich war sogar mit einem Nodalpunktadapter vor Ort, den ich aber i.d.R. nicht zur Auflösungsmaximierung einsetze sondern um den Bildwinkel zu erweitern und z.B. ein Kugelpanorama zu erstellen. Ehrlich gesagt finde ich es auch etwas übertrieben bei solchen Motiven immer gleich ein Giga-Pixelpanorama zu erwarten. Da sich kaum einer der Nutzer in der WP bis zur 100% Ansicht durchklickt (und solche Riesenpanoramen dann auch häufig die Rechner überfordern), halte ich es sinnvoller Details auch als solche abzubilden. Auch auf FPC sind schließlich Einzelbilder die Regel und Megastichings eher die Ausnahme.
  • Und was SingleShot vs. HDR-Fusion angeht, denke ich das mit letzterem häufig ziemlich übertrieben wird – zumal man heutzutage beim RAW-Processing auch aus einem Single-Shot ziemlich viel Dynamic herausholen kann. MMn sollte insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Verwendung in der Wikipedia eine realistische Anmutung im Vordergrund stehen. Und da ist es natürlich toll, wenn man bei Bilder des Inneren einer Kirche auch auf den bunten Fenstern noch Zeichnung hat, aber Blödsinn, wenn alles zu einem kontrastvereinheitlichten aber farbübersättigtem Brei verschmilzt. HDR kann mal ein toller Effekt sein, aber es ist eben ein Effekt und nicht der neue Standard für die Bildwahrnehmung. Die menschliche Wahrnehmung benötigt Kontraste, hell und dunkel. Und deshalb ist es auch in Ordnung wenn auf einem Bild auch mal die Lichtquellen ausbrennen und schwarze Löcher auch schwarz sind. --Martin Kraft (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10679 Moritzstrasse 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10679 Moritzstrasse 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10680 Moritzstrasse 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10680 Moritzstrasse 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10682 Moritzstrasse 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10682 Moritzstrasse 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10352 Herz-Jesu-Kirche Wiesbaden-Sonnenberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10352 Herz-Jesu-Kirche Wiesbaden-Sonnenberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10673 Wiesbaden Wappen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10673 Wiesbaden Wappen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10612 Maulbronn Stauferstele.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10612 Maulbronn Stauferstele.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK4773-4774 Kurhaus Kuppel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK4773-4774 Kurhaus Kuppel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK4774 Kurhaus Kuppel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK4774 Kurhaus Kuppel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10734 Sender Bad Marienberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10734 Sender Bad Marienberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10727 Sender Bad Marienberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10727 Sender Bad Marienberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK5274 Poreč.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK5274 Poreč.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK5271 Euphrasius Basilika Poreč.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK5271 Euphrasius Basilika Poreč.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10699 Hachenburg Alter Markt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10699 Hachenburg Alter Markt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nikolaikirche Stralsund zur blauen Stunde.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolaikirche Stralsund zur blauen Stunde.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nikolaikirche (Stralsund) mittig.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolaikirche (Stralsund) mittig.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10713 Hachenburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10713 Hachenburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10712 Hachenburg Hotel zur Krone.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10712 Hachenburg Hotel zur Krone.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10709 Hachenburg Hotel zur Krone.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10709 Hachenburg Hotel zur Krone.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK6634 Bonifatiuskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK6634 Bonifatiuskirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10706 Hachenburg Schlosskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10706 Hachenburg Schlosskirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10696f Hachenburg Alter Markt Franziskanerkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10696f Hachenburg Alter Markt Franziskanerkirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK6624 Bonifatiuskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK6624 Bonifatiuskirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK11340 Höhn Bahnhofstraße 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11340 Höhn Bahnhofstraße 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK11342 Höhn Bahnhofstraße 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11342 Höhn Bahnhofstraße 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK11375 Herbertanlage Wiesbaden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11375 Herbertanlage Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK11373 Neubau Lahntalbrücke Limburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11373 Neubau Lahntalbrücke Limburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK12290 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK12290 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK12213 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK12213 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK12229 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK12229 BeyondTellerand Erik Spiekermann.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK11587 Hafenspitze Düsseldorf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11587 Hafenspitze Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK12875-79 Rüdesheim am Rhein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK12875-79 Rüdesheim am Rhein.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK11591 Hafenspitze Düsseldorf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK11591 Hafenspitze Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK1568 Staatistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden Pferd.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK1568 Staatistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden Pferd.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz[edit]

WLE-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Martin Kraft,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)

File:AVE Ostalpen.png[edit]

I've found some mistakes on this map. Firstly, there is 'double eighteen number'. 'The eastern 18' should be '19'. Secondly, in my opinion, it needs some correction of the Totes Gebirge borders (Oberösterreichische Voralpen as well). I have sent you, by E-mail, image with my sketches. Best regards, RRady (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch![edit]

Hallo Martin Kraft,

Du hast beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Deutschland teilgenommen, wofür wir Dir herzlich danken. Ohne jeden einzelnen Teilnehmer, ohne jedes einzelne Bild wäre Wiki Loves Earth nicht so erfolgreich. Mit den vielen neuen Bildern können jetzt einerseits zahlreiche Wikipedia-Artikel bebildert werden, andererseits schaffen sie Anreize, neue Inhalte zu erstellen, die sich mit ihnen illustrieren lassen.

Von den mehr als 14.000 eingesandten Bildern hat die Jury eines oder mehrere von Dir in die deutschen Top 100 gewählt.

Das Ergebnis mit den Top 100 ist hier einzusehen: Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014/Deutschland/Top100

Die ersten zehn wurden schon für den internationalen Ausscheid gemeldet: Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014_winners#Germany

Es war der erste Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Deutschland und wir als Jury sind vom Erfolg überwältigt. Daher würden wir uns sehr freuen, wenn Du dich nächstes Mal erneut beteiligen würdest!

Herzlichen Glückwunsch von der Jury und vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung! --Indeedous (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Martin Kraft,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

User / Benutzer[edit]

… bei File:MK19629 Bronisław Komorowski Joachim Gauck Norbert Lammert.jpg et. al. → Gutes Beispiel für Help:VisualFileChange.js. ireas (talk) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:MK19946 Franz-Josef Jung.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MK19946 Franz-Josef Jung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stepro (talk) 17:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Kraft (talk) 22:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Aha![edit]

Der feine Herr hat jetzt eine eigene Kategorie! :D Einsortieren in Category:Hidden categories bringt übrigens nichts. Wenn, dann müsstest du das magische Wort hinzufügen, die Kategorie kommt dann automatisch. Ist meiner Meinung nach hier aber gar nicht notwendig, da das ja keine Metakategorie ist. Grüße, ireas (talk) 08:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Das Magische Wort? Ist schon irgendwie eine Metakategorie, da ich mich (im Gegensatz zu anderen) nicht wirklich für relevant halte, sondern einfach nur gerne den Überblick hätte, wo ich überall drauf bin. ---Martin Kraft (talk) 08:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Germanismus für Magic words. „Schalter“ finde ich da noch schlimmer. ^^ ireas (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Puh, es gibt hier echt schon eine ganze Menge Photos von mir. //Martin Kraft (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
… und ein ganz klares Highlight!  ;-) ireas (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK29764 An der alten Synagoge 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29764 An der alten Synagoge 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29767 An der alten Synagoge 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29767 An der alten Synagoge 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10484 Maulbronner Paradies.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10484 Maulbronner Paradies.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK10421 Maulbronn Kameralamt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10421 Maulbronn Kameralamt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK10450 Maulbronn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK10450 Maulbronn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK29800 Kaiser-Friedrich-Denkmal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29800 Kaiser-Friedrich-Denkmal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK17998 Lincoln Cathedral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17998 Lincoln Cathedral.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK17622 Women of World War II.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17622 Women of World War II.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29812 Rheinstraße 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29812 Rheinstraße 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29842 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29842 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29841 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29841 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29844 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29844 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29835 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29835 Dotzheimer Straße 68.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

M. Krafft - is that you?[edit]

Hi Martin Kraft,

I was just going through the list of contributors on QIC the last week, and in the process I noticed a single entry of a user M. Krafft? Curiously enough just above your nominations. Are you the same user as M. Krafft? -- Slaunger (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Slaunger: No, I am not. That's just another user with a similar name. We are neither related nor do we know each other. The correct spelling of my familyname is Kraft with a single f - the german word for power, force or strength. // Martin Kraft (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK29809 Wilhelmstraße 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29809 Wilhelmstraße 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29834 Scharnhorststraße 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29834 Scharnhorststraße 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK29831 Scharnhorststraße 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29831 Scharnhorststraße 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK29779 An der alten Synagoge 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29779 An der alten Synagoge 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

indicate if changes were made[edit]

Hi, I was really surprised to see that "indicate if changes were made" is a part of the cc-by-sa license. All this time I just read past that. I must have been cropping I guess 2500 images released under this license during the years... Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@Jan Arkesteijn: Due to the version history and edit-comments you should be fine, if you just edited images who were on commons before. But you should be more carefull when editing and uploading images from external sources. I would suggest always to upload the orignal version first and than override it with the edited one.
In this respect the fact that you retouched the frame of the second painting is imho more important here than the crop itself. // Martin Kraft (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
I will take care in the future, but I will leave the past uploads as they are. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

Hallo Martin,

Ich habe gerade im zum hessischen Landtag deine Grafik ([4]) gesehen. Sieht sehr schön aus, vielen Dank dafür. :) Was mir bloß gerade aufgefallen ist: Im Artikel steht "18. Legislaturperiode (2009 bis 2014)", in deiner Grafik dagegen 2009 bis 2013. Was ist denn nun richtig?

Viele Grüße, --178.7.204.221 08:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

@178.7.204.221: Beides ;) Das hat was mit den etwas seltsamen hessichen Wahlfristen zu tun. Die Landtagswahl fand ja bereits im September 2013 statt. Da das daraus entstehende Parlament sich aber erst am 18. Januar 2014 konstituierte, war streng genommen auch erst an diesem Tag die vorangegange Legislaturperiode zu Ende. Da aber in den paar Tagen 2014 vor dieser Sitzung keinerlei parlamentarische Arbeit des alten Parlaments, geschweige denn eine Plenarsitzung stattgefunden hat, habe ich mich entschieden, für das Bestehen dieser Landtags-Zusammensetzung nur die Jahre anzugeben, in denen sie auch tatsächlich bestand. // Martin Kraft (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Alpengruppen-Karten[edit]

Grüß Gott,

Ihre Karte von den Bayerischen Voralpen ist ausgesprochen gut. Leider hat sich lange Zeit nichts mehr getan. Es gibt einige wenige Karten der gesamten Alpen mit kleiner roter Markierung, die ich heute zugeordnet habe. Ihre Darstellung ist aber in Bezug auf Ausschnitt und Farbgebung vorzuziehen. Es wäre schön, wenn Sie weitere zumindest für die Gruppen, die derzeit gar keine haben, fertigen könnten. Falls Sie Lageinformationen brauchen, helfe ich gern weiter.

--Friedo (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

@FkMohr: Wie schon auf der Diskussionsseite der Karte geschrieben, stehe ich vor dem Problem, dass die Orginaldatei zu dieser Karte irgendwie leider verloren gegangen ist. Ich müsste diese also wahrscheinlich nochmal nachbauen, bevor ich da irgendwelche Abformate machen kann (was ich natürlich gerne tun würde) - und das kann leider etwas dauern :( // Martin K. (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
@Martin Kraft: Welche "Original-Datei" Sie meinen und ob die nötig ist, weiß ich nicht. Obiger Link zur Ostalpen-Übersicht zeigt, dass diese auch nicht ganz richtig wäre. Die Grenzen zwischen den Gebirgsgruppen müssen immer den Wasserläufen folgen, die ja in den SAT-Karten zu erkennen sind. Zur Orientierung können Sie meine Scans aus KNAURS Lexikon für Bergfreunde verwenden: Westliche Ostalpen & Mittlere Ostalpen. Die dicken gelben Linien sind die Staatsgrenzen. Hier noch eine genauere Karte: Ötztaler Alpen als Beispiel, weitere könnte ich auf Wunsch scannen. Die roten Linien sind Straßen, doch die Gruppengrenze verläuft entlang der blauen (Wasser), bzw. über Pässe (Sattel).
--Friedo (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
@FkMohr: Mit "Original-Datei" meine ich die Illustator-Datei in der ich diese Karte zusammengebaut habe. Die besteht nämlich nicht nur aus einem flachen Bild (wie das hiesige PNG) sondern aus diversenen Ebenen, editierbaren Texten usw. so dass sie sich im Nachhinein einfach bearbeiten lässt. Und leider ist genau diese Datei verloren gegangen.
Das die Grenzen nicht 100% auf den Flüssen liegen, dürfte damit zutun haben, dass ich hier Elemente aus unterschiedlichen Quellen kombiniert habe und diese scheinbar nicht 100% deckungsgleich waren. Wenn ich Zeit finde, das Ganze nochmal neu aufzubauen, werde ich versuchen das etwas besser auszugleichen. Das kann aber noch dauern.
Danke für das Angebot mit dem Scannen. Aber wenn auf der aktuellen Karte keine ganz gravierenden Fehler (?) sondern nur Ungenauigkeiten sind, sollte ich eigentlich alles haben was ich brauche. Falls nicht meld' ich mich. // Martin K. (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK33556 Bonifatiuskirche Wiesbaden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK33556 Bonifatiuskirche Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK03217 University of Washington Suzzallo Library.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK03217 University of Washington Suzzallo Library.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK03214 University of Washington Suzzallo Library.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK03214 University of Washington Suzzallo Library.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK17849 Eton College Church Yard.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17849 Eton College Church Yard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK17839 Eton College Weston's Yard.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17839 Eton College Weston's Yard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK17834 Eton College.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17834 Eton College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK17840 Eton College.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17840 Eton College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK17792 Eton College Chapel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK17792 Eton College Chapel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK29864 Excelsior Hotel Ernst Köln.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK29864 Excelsior Hotel Ernst Köln.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK06522 SchlossBiebrich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK06522 SchlossBiebrich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK00630 Badlands Panorama Point.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK00630 Badlands Panorama Point.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK00531 Badlands.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK00531 Badlands.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK00609 Badlands.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK00609 Badlands.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK00667-75 Badlands Pinnacles overlook.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK00667-75 Badlands Pinnacles overlook.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK00658 Badlands Bighorn Sheep.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK00658 Badlands Bighorn Sheep.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK03330 Star Princess Seattle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK03330 Star Princess Seattle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK03345 CSAV Brasilia in Seattle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK03345 CSAV Brasilia in Seattle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

OTRS-Abarbeitung mit Entfernung von Wartungskategorien[edit]

Hallo, wenn Du unkategorisierte Dateien wie die hier bearbeitest, wäre es nützlich, wenn Du zumindest eine Kategorie zuweist. Neulinge machen das das selten, und rückwirkend so gut wie nie. Man kann hier also recht einfach eine chronisch verstopfte Wartungskategorie entlasten, denn "anfassen" musst Du die Datei ja ohnehin. Beste Grüße, --Emha (talk) 15:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC) PS: Du brauchst m.E. eine Archivierung Deiner Disk. :)

@Emha: Danke für den Hinweis. Das hatte ich wohl übersehen. War ein Nachläufer von einem ganzen Stoß von Freigaben und die meisten anderen waren kategorisiert. Bin sie jetzt nochmal alle durchgegangen, ich hoffe es stimmt jetzt alles?!
Ich versuch in Zukunft etwas mehr darauf zu achten - jetzt wo wir den Monsterrückstau in der Permission-Queue etwas im Griff haben. // Martin K. (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Martin , danke! Das war übrigens noch kein Monsterstau, da gab es leider schon viel schlimmeres... Auf gute Zusammenarbeit, mit besten Grüßen, --Emha (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Naja, wir waren (allein in permission-de) bei deutlich über 200 Tickets (davon viel doppelt und dreifach gesandten), jetzt sind wir bei unter 20 (was die Arbeit schon deshalb deutlich vereinfacht, weil nicht alles schon gelöscht, erneut hochgelade und wieder gelöscht wurde) – wäre daher toll, wenn wir das halten könnten. Aber vielleicht ist das ja nur der naive Wunsch eines Neulings ;) // Martin K. (talk) 10:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK 36878-82 Wiesbaden vom Neroberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK 36878-82 Wiesbaden vom Neroberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK33871 Limburger Dom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK33871 Limburger Dom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK33874 Limburger Dom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK33874 Limburger Dom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MK33873 Limburger Dom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK33873 Limburger Dom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MK33808 Docks Hamburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MK33808 Docks Hamburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Barbara Karlich[edit]

Hallo Martin, im IRC hat jemand zur Durchsicht deines OTRS-ticket:2015031110010238 gebeten, dabei ist mir aufgefallen dass in Artikel 10 zwei Fotos angehängt wurden, von denen ich eines nicht auf Commons finden kann (barbara_k_083.jpeg). Sollte das (nach ev. vorheriger Konkretisierung) noch hochgeladen werden? Liebe Grüße,    FDMS  4    19:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

@FDMS4: Danke fürs Nachhaken. Nein, ich denke, das kann so bleiben. Es ging ja damals in den Mails ein paar mal hin und her bis die Kundin wusste, was sie wollte und die dafür nötigen Freigaben zusammen hatte. Da würde ich jetzt nicht mehr dran ruckeln. Mehr als ein Bild braucht es für den Personenartikel eh nicht und so wie ich die Kundin einschätze kommt in ein, zwei Jahren eh ein Update.
P.S.: Ich kann mir übrigens gut vorstellen, wer das nochmal nachrecherchiert haben wollte und warum ;) Da scheint mal wieder wer eine Dissenz in Sachfragen zum Anlass zu nehmen, einem an anderer Stelle irgendwie ans Bein pinkeln zu wollen?! Na, wenn er meint... // Martin K. (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Stimmt[clarification needed]. Außerdem sind wir OTRS-Mitglieder ja bekanntlich die korruptesten und vertrauensunwürdigsten Benutzer :) .    FDMS  4    22:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)